I don't think so. I mean, I could see the argument for the call, but I generally air on the side of 'letting kids be kids'. What's the official verdict?
Please tell me this was not called taunting. It was not directed at an opponent and did not draw undue attention to the player. Hopefully this was ruled a good no-call.
This was a "spontaneous" celebration. It was not directed at anyone, nor was it sustained for a period of time. In the spirit of the rule, this is a "no-call."
You are all incorrect... this 100% taunting, and yes, he called attention to himself.
gbounit 1 year ago
I don't think so. I mean, I could see the argument for the call, but I generally air on the side of 'letting kids be kids'. What's the official verdict?
cliedl 2 years ago
nothing there! that is NOT taunting or unsportsmanlike. Good NO call
domash 2 years ago
Please tell me this was not called taunting. It was not directed at an opponent and did not draw undue attention to the player. Hopefully this was ruled a good no-call.
Boonevol 3 years ago
This was a "spontaneous" celebration. It was not directed at anyone, nor was it sustained for a period of time. In the spirit of the rule, this is a "no-call."
nctheus58 3 years ago