I'v been able to ride in these thing's 3 times since I was a Marine back from Okinowa, and inot and out of Iraq . They might not look like it but they can move !
i dont know, i just dont like the design, it`t just not someting that i like. I admire it for its capabilities and rater large cargo hold, ive myself seen a AN-124 from Volga djenper. But of some reason i would prefer a C-17 or C-5 probearly becouse of the design :)
well its a larger plaine but i it does not fitt for the tasks the C-17 can preform, i would pick my transport plaine out from which task i wanted done, if a larg cargo to a safe airport , the AN-225. If a bitt smaler cargo to a area that is diffucult to exes or to stratigic/ tactical missions.
yeah, but still its to big which means that its a big target, with to littel of them in the air, is im not mistaking, its only 25 AN-124 and 1 AN-225. And i think (underline) that it has littel option of military manuvering. But the C-5 and C-17 is buildt for the military and their needs while the Antonovs were buildt originaly for transporting missils around in russia
Awesome vid
Sturmgewehr14 2 years ago
thx
krigertom 2 years ago
jeg synes det er et drit bra fly
kristo3003 2 years ago
jeg og, og heldige meg har vært så heldig å faktisk få se det, det er drit kult:)
krigertom 2 years ago
I'v been able to ride in these thing's 3 times since I was a Marine back from Okinowa, and inot and out of Iraq . They might not look like it but they can move !
Herbymac0811 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A super video for an awesome aircraft. good job
FxGunMetal 2 years ago
I love the Russian monster Antonov A22
Its the biggest -fastest and most beautiful transport aircraft
21StCenturyWarfare 2 years ago
i dont know, i just dont like the design, it`t just not someting that i like. I admire it for its capabilities and rater large cargo hold, ive myself seen a AN-124 from Volga djenper. But of some reason i would prefer a C-17 or C-5 probearly becouse of the design :)
krigertom 2 years ago
@krigertom
ye i understand=)
i dont care let it just be military with me inside it !
21StCenturyWarfare 2 years ago
hehe, yeah anyway it would be fun to be on it, its quit admirabul how it can fly, that would be great
krigertom 2 years ago
that's big fella :-)
petrwarry72 2 years ago
oh yeah, and its a hell of a lot bigger close up :)
krigertom 2 years ago
I prefer the Antonov AN-225
drumz20089 2 years ago
well its a larger plaine but i it does not fitt for the tasks the C-17 can preform, i would pick my transport plaine out from which task i wanted done, if a larg cargo to a safe airport , the AN-225. If a bitt smaler cargo to a area that is diffucult to exes or to stratigic/ tactical missions.
krigertom 2 years ago
@krigertom
agree but i still like russian and im not russian
but as far i know russian planes are quick maintenance cheap many hours of flight great engine thats what you need in a war
but the C-17 is also good if i had an army i woul do that C-17 like C-130 Spectre
21StCenturyWarfare 2 years ago
yeah, but still its to big which means that its a big target, with to littel of them in the air, is im not mistaking, its only 25 AN-124 and 1 AN-225. And i think (underline) that it has littel option of military manuvering. But the C-5 and C-17 is buildt for the military and their needs while the Antonovs were buildt originaly for transporting missils around in russia
krigertom 2 years ago
Vi burde hatt masse vis av sånne fly :D
Finni100 2 years ago
ja der sier du noe, vi brude hatt kanskje 12 herkules fly og kanskje 6 av disse:).
krigertom 2 years ago
I hver base ;)
Finni100 2 years ago
hehe, ja kanskje det, det hadde virkelig vært noe det:)
krigertom 2 years ago