Study US History on people who behaved from good to evil.
Throughout history extremely few Emperors, Empresses, Kings, Queens, and similar others proved their nobility, compassion, and understanding of people's behavior, however, the majority today's are not close. The world still has leaders who are tyrants and with some worse than others.
Many rulers can be labeled as the unnecessary evil with their mindful supporters and associations.
what is life of being queen and a king.. if you are always inside your palace...without experiencing the life outside. with body guards.no private,lots of money but cannot eat athe food she/he likes...because strick doctor...if you were the king/queens daughter/son.... you always inside the palace..without experincing playing with some child outside.. Lots of money but unto Her/his last breathe..not even experiencing to eat many kinds of food.because it is strick.
Where's the part where she's dancing with Pres. Ford and the band strikes up Rodgers & Hart's "The Lady Is A Tramp"?! Now, THAT was genius. Better than those fawning, curtseying Reagans any day. RIP Mrs. Ford.
We don't have an empire. Pax Americana is just us trying to keep atrocities and bad trade to a minimum, and avoid more world conquerers who'd threaten us.
Regardless of personal relationships, the US civilization and govt and culture are descended from the UK. That will last until we adopt a new language and become communists. We gain a lot from it, and hiding inside our borders is cowardly.
Very annoying though how shes always reading from a piece of paper. Ever heard of memorization? Youd think she could memorize this short piece for the occasion. Guess not.
Also, i personally advocate for the U.S. to end all diplomatic relations, close all embassies around the world, and stop fighting all wars that we are involved in accordance with the wisihes of Washington, Adams, Franklin, and Jefferson. James Monroe reinforced this in his Doctrine in the early 1800s.
It is time for the U.S. to look inwards, focus on the domestic homeland, and become isolationist and insular as it was truly intended to be from the very beginning.
I didn't say it was the fault of the US, my point is that isolationism didn't protect the US in the 1940s and it wouldn't protect the US now or in the future.
Trade is irrevocably linked to diplomacy and without embassies throughout the world to aid business links trade would grind to a halt. Put simply, the US cannot feed itself and needs to trade with other countries.
Nations work in their own self-interest already, and it is often very damaging to neighbouring nations.
@Medeasbiggestfan A standing army and conscription should be called up only when another nation or enemy is waging war. A military should only be for defensive purposes and not to offend.
By that reasoning, America (like Japan) should be a pacifist country.
By engaging in the world, the US can stop wars and prevent attacks before they come to its shores.
Imagine if the US had focused on defence after Pearl Harbour and not helped the allies in Europe. Japan would have conquered Asia and the Nazis would have conquered the USSR and the British Empire, gaining access to British and Soviet nuclear research.
Could the US really have defeated a nuclear armed Hitler who had just conquered much of the world? If so, at what cost?
@Medeasbiggestfan The United States entering the European theatre of World War II was not necessary for the sime fact that Nazi Germany never attacked the U.S.
Howver, Japan did attack the U.S. so we had every justification to fight in the Pacific theatre of World War II. The war fought between Hitler, Churchill, and de Gaulle was none of Roosevelt's business.
The only thing Europe did was take America's money, and thought after it ended they wouldnt ever have to repay that debt back to us.
@Medeasbiggestfan "Could the US really have defeated a nuclear armed Hitler who had just conquered much of the world? If so, at what cost?"
You forget a very big obstacle. It is called the Atlantic Ocean and there is some 3,000 miles of it between North America and Europe. Even if Hitler nuked the USA, he never could have occupied the USA because of the geography and the sheer size and population of the USA.
If the US hadn't entered the war when they did, the Nazis would have conquered the USSR. They then would have moved to conquer the British Empire (which included Canada).
Do you really think the Nazis would have stopped at the US border? Even if the US could have resisted, the continental United States would have been devastated, and freedom and democracy would only be accessible to a very small minority of the world's population.
@Medeasbiggestfan As a matter of fact, no foreign power or country could ever occupy the USA die to its large geographical size and its very large population. 9/11 proved that the USA is not immune to attack, but to occupy, nobody could do that.
Britian could not occupy America in 1776, the Japs tried it in 1941. Impossible.
@Medeasbiggestfan As a matter of fact, no foreign power or country could ever occupy the USA die to its large geographical size and its very large population. 9/11 proved that the USA is not immune to attack, but to occupy, nobody could do that.
Britian could not occupy America in 1776, the Japs tried it in 1941. Impossible.
@Medeasbiggestfan It has been tried. During the American Revolutionary War, the colonial militia and the Continental Army alluded the British Army for years. The British had better trained infantry, but that still was not good enough because they didnt knpow the terrain nor did they win the hearts and minds of the colonists. Again, the British tried in 1812, but a total occupation failed the battles Americans lost in Canada, they more than well made up and won back in the U.S.
Firstly, the US was the aggressor in the War of 1812. Both in 1776 and 1812, the British didn't really care about America and didn't put its full forces into taking the continent. Also, the British Empire didn’t have nuclear weapons.
The Japanese government couldn't hold out when two of its cities were destroyed by atomic bombs, I doubt any government would. The American people would have risen up against a Nazi occupation, but it was far better to stop the Nazis in Europe.
@Medeasbiggestfan "the British didn't really care about America and didn't put its full forces into taking the continent."
Oh they cared a lot. Otherwise they wouldnt have moved the entire British Army across 3,000 miles of ocean to fight a war that lasted from 1775 to 1783--- eight years of fighting!
As for the War of 1812, both the USA and the UK were the losers as the winners of that war was Canada.
At the start of the American War of Independence, the British did care, but interests in India soon became more important.
The UK blocked Franco-American trade in 1812 because the US was supporting Napoleon (the French dictator) with whom the British Empire was at war.
While fighting the US, the UK defeated Napoleon, after which the British didn't care about blocking trade. If there had been no war in the Americas, the UK would have still stopped the blockade in 1814.
@Medeasbiggestfan "The UK blocked Franco-American trade in 1812 because the US was supporting Napoleon"
And what gave your nation the God given right to interfere in the trade and commerce of two other countries?
As I see it, the Brits today like to think that America bullies them to oblivion, but a very very very long time ago, it was your nation that did that to us. Since 1941, the roles between the US and UK have been reversed and it is a taste of your own medicine which you do not like.
The US was helping a dictator who was at war with the UK. Had trade continued, Napoleon may have conquered Europe. It is ironic that the self-proclaimed 'land of the free' should have supported Napoleon, who wanted to removed freedom and democracy from the people of Europe.
The US doesn't bully the UK today, although the UK in recent times has followed American policies, but that has changed with the new British government. The UK will no longer blindly follow the US.
@Medeasbiggestfan And why shouldn't we have supported France in the Napoleonic Wars? Afterall, it was France that assisted us in gaining our independence. France gave us freedom and democracy. By that token, the French and later Napoleon were the epitome of freedom and democracy, overthrowing the King, chopping his head off, and installing Napoleon as emperor.
Just because France was a perceived threat to the UK, didnt give you the right to dictate to us of who we can have good relations with.
The French replaced one dictator with another, that's not very democratic. They only helped the American colonists because they opposed the British, it had nothing to do with Americans wanting freedom and democracy - the French didn't care about that.
You’re the only who said that countries should act in their own self-interest. It was in the UK’s interest to stop Franco-American trade.
@Medeasbiggestfan And you forget, Hitler tried to invae and occupy the USSR. He failed because even though the Soviets had poorly trained soldiers compared to the Nazis, they had a larger military and could afford to lose tens of millions in terms of death.
Also, in World War II, the US economy was triple the size of Nazi Germany's that had much more industrial output. A nation that can build 150,000 Sherman tanks in four years is a well armed country. The Germans would have no chance.
@SnickleFritz79 I agree with you, I don't give a damn about the world and I don't care if they give a damn about us. I want America to be free of entangling alliances and beholden to all the protectorates in our empire.
Our republic will not survive if we hold onto the empire. And the "special" relationship with Britain ended in 1776. I have no interest in restarting it.
I find it sickening how we invite a Queen who heads a country that is our ancestral enemy.
How quickly Americans forget that it is France that was our first and has been our oldest alliance in our 234 years of existence.
I for one will never forget or forgive. Several British Redcoats raped female members of my family at Brandywine, and then burned the house and barns down amidst the ensuing battle.
The sins of the father should not be passed on to the children.
Do you think the US and Vietnam should never become friends because of what happened during the Vietnam War? Do you think Germany and Poland should forever be enemies for what happened during the Second World War?
Currently, British and American troops are serving together in Afghanistan, I think that is the true testament to the incredibly close relationship between the UK and US.
@Medeasbiggestfan A man by the name of George Washington warned the American people and insisted that the U.S. not enter into alliances with foreign countries, get mixed up in world affairs, or engage in foreign wars.
In fact. all of the Founding Fathers advocated for isolationism and insularity The alliance was necessitated due to fighting a common enemy. But that alliance was expected to end once independence was finalized.
No country should have a special relationship with another country.
No, he addressed HRH Prince Philip and basically invited him to toast the Queen. Obviously he was not going to invite her for her own toast...that would have been funny.
@ProvocatedHoax: It's nonsens what you're saying ! Or it's the fact that I'm a nobleman. It's wrong that today the power of reign countries lies with the citizen of countries. The power has to be in the hands of Kings, Queens en the Nobility ! Long live the Queen and Aristocracy !
Hey look! It's a descendant of that Island country whose ass we kicked out of ours.
Kings, Queens & other so-called nobility(ha ha) who think themselves worthy to rule over others are not worthy enough to even lick my dogs ass.
All "royalty" can go to hell and I thank the gods that my ancestors beat your asses 200+ years ago, and if you ever rear your pathetic, weak tyrannical heads up again then we'll be glad to kick your asses for a 3rd time. The war of 1812 in case you've forgotten.
@BloodTar: If you hate Monarchy and Nobility, why are you looking to this video's ? If you can't bare it, just don't look...
And futher, you are so republican... You're pathetic and stupid.
Royalty and Nobility are destined to rule (het gepeupel, as we say in Dutch) it means, the little people, normal stupid humans. We are superior to them en we have the capacity etc. to rule and dominated them !
Hey shit for brains! I'm not a Republican or Democrat. Why don't you try ruling over your toilet. You have no "capacity to dominate" anyone. You can give a badge, gun and authority and the title of police officer to any high school grad and I guarantee you that he/she will dominate and rule over your weak Dutch ass, but in no way does it make him/her superior just because they dominate you.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Britain is and will remain the ancestral enemy of the United States and this woman in the ugly yellow frock is the descendant of the tyrant and criminal George III. If I were a guest at that dinner I would have taken a gun to her head and blow her brains out.
YogaNate79 - "If I were a guest at that dinner I would have taken a gun to her head and blow her brains out". Dream on sonny, dream on. You'd be lucky to be invited to the local soup kitchen.
@werdnanivrag Me? Come on! What I meant is that I love the United Kingdom as much as I love the United States of America. We Americans and Britons share the same three colors of our respective national flags. I even studied there at Leeds College of Music back in 2007-2008 when I got accepted there and rejected from Western Washington University in Bellingham after a series of piano auditions.
1 star because I cannot rate this piece of shit suggestion any lower. The Video is FANTASTIC, the Queen is wonderful and seeing cooperation between America and the UK is amazing.
You infowars tards need to loosen those fuckin tin foil caps and live in the real world for a change.
@JohnnyH1982 queens and kings are a thing of the past, but some of us europeans have still to pay the price from the dark middle ages. Monarcy and democracy are uncompatible in my view. If we are all the same, then there should be no queen/king and all the expensive shit that goes with it paid for by the peasants.
@JohnnyH1982 What an idiot. You actually think these elitists care about you? Fool. Their attitudes havent changed nor will they ever change. The rhetoric and methods have changed over time to reflect the changes in society but at its core its still predatory.
@JohnnyH1982 Look at these disgusting bastards, swine!! They should be executed!! They need to be- f'ing little minions of the Rothschilds surpressing the English & world. This bastard Royal family is worth over $100 trillion!!! They keep it a secret & lead you to think B. Gates is the worlds richest man so the focus will be off them!!! Ah,ha,ha,ha! What bastards!! What CUNNING bastards!! They're plundering the U.K. & europe with their banking interest control! These maggots are Hitlers killem
No I'm not. The British system of government hasn't changed much in more than 300. In 1776, as now, it was the elected Prime Minister who had all the power. Poor old King George gets all the blame even though he was just a figurehead.
You live in the UK and are totally brainwashed like the rest of Europe.
Guess what? THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE RULE YOU! AND YOU ARE THEIR SLAVE AND THE GOVERNMENTS ARE JUST FRONTS!
Why is it that the "politicians" in the UK have to take an oath of allegiance to the queen, and not to the people? Because it is the queen's government! Not yours!!!
Haven't you ever heard the queen say, "my government, or my people, or my soldiers??"
The Queen only says "my government" when giving the Queen's speech, which is written by the democratically elected Prime Minister. If she does write them herself she's schizophrenic, sounding like Thatcher in the 80s and Blair in the 90s.
And if Europe is run by its royal families, how come most European countries are republics?
I really do wonder where do people get these nonsensical conspiracy theories?
your view of our nation its monarchy and government is quite wrong, we maybe here people but she is our queen she works in our interestes and if they step a foot wrong they get their head choped of like the last time.
I tend to view monarchy in much the same way Thomas Hobbes did.
Being the king or queen is a messy business... Elizabeth I had no problem getting rid of her enemies. William of Orange was greeted as a liberator. And William the Conqueror... well, let's just say I prefer a more traditional English, less civilized approach to the throne!
Not only that, but do you know the EU is effectively governing you?
About 80% of the laws in the UK are made in Brussels. And the lisbon treaty is the EU constitution(the same one France and Holland voted NO on in 05) and even though ireland voted no on that shit the EU is going to bring it in anyway somehow.
Be very careful about a staged attack so they can push it through.
Wait a minute! Are Europeans slaves of royalty or slaves of the EU?
The monarch hasn't had any executive power since 1689. MPs swear an oath to the Queen because she swore an oath to the people at her coronation.
France and Holland were against the EU constitution because of the constitutional parts, parts which were removed from the Lisbon treaty. Ireland objected because Sinn Fein and others who said it would legalise abortion. But the Lisbon treaty doesn't affect abortion laws at all.
The American revolution was against Parliament, not king George. You are correct.
The founders of the USA were ENGLISHMEN like me and they weren't afraid to use propaganda to their benefit, nor were they afraid to die for their "sacred honor" as ENGLISHMEN in rebellion.
The Stars and Bars, Old Glory and Union Jack are red, white and blue for a reason...
end the fed :)
werdnanivrag 1 month ago
Abolish the monarchy and sell all their stolen loot for the benefit of the people.
bogglerful 3 months ago
Always peacefully expose corruption and evil.
Study US History on people who behaved from good to evil.
Throughout history extremely few Emperors, Empresses, Kings, Queens, and similar others proved their nobility, compassion, and understanding of people's behavior, however, the majority today's are not close. The world still has leaders who are tyrants and with some worse than others.
Many rulers can be labeled as the unnecessary evil with their mindful supporters and associations.
lamourlupus 5 months ago
what is life of being queen and a king.. if you are always inside your palace...without experiencing the life outside. with body guards.no private,lots of money but cannot eat athe food she/he likes...because strick doctor...if you were the king/queens daughter/son.... you always inside the palace..without experincing playing with some child outside.. Lots of money but unto Her/his last breathe..not even experiencing to eat many kinds of food.because it is strick.
ericsantiago011 6 months ago
Was there another female member of the Royal Family there? If not, why did he refer to her as Her Royal Highness instead of Her Majesty???
politelypompous 6 months ago
@politelypompous he invited HRH (Prince Philip) and ladies and gentlemen to drink to the Queen s health
dimacosi 4 months ago
Where's the part where she's dancing with Pres. Ford and the band strikes up Rodgers & Hart's "The Lady Is A Tramp"?! Now, THAT was genius. Better than those fawning, curtseying Reagans any day. RIP Mrs. Ford.
nauort23 7 months ago
Good thing he didn't puke on her!
ecnalubma696969 8 months ago
We don't have an empire. Pax Americana is just us trying to keep atrocities and bad trade to a minimum, and avoid more world conquerers who'd threaten us.
Regardless of personal relationships, the US civilization and govt and culture are descended from the UK. That will last until we adopt a new language and become communists. We gain a lot from it, and hiding inside our borders is cowardly.
Also, sexy Brits. Those are nice too.
Lamashtar 1 year ago
Comment removed
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
Very annoying though how shes always reading from a piece of paper. Ever heard of memorization? Youd think she could memorize this short piece for the occasion. Guess not.
ColdCypher 1 year ago
She actually looks pretty attractive in this movie.
ColdCypher 1 year ago
Comment removed
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
Also, i personally advocate for the U.S. to end all diplomatic relations, close all embassies around the world, and stop fighting all wars that we are involved in accordance with the wisihes of Washington, Adams, Franklin, and Jefferson. James Monroe reinforced this in his Doctrine in the early 1800s.
It is time for the U.S. to look inwards, focus on the domestic homeland, and become isolationist and insular as it was truly intended to be from the very beginning.
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@SnickleFritz79
The US tried isolationism during the Second World War and it didn't work - the war came to the US.
The world is so interconnected now that isolationism is impossible and would destroy the US economy.
I didn't mention the special relationship, I was talking about friendship and cooperation on tackling global issues.
Also, surely if you reject any special relationship with another country, you should also reject being an eternal enemy of another country.
Medeasbiggestfan 1 year ago
@Medeasbiggestfan "The US tried isolationism during WW2 and it didn't work - the war came to the US."
That was Europe's and Japan's fault. Not ours-- a difference between being defensive and offensive.
"The world is so interconnected now that isolationism is impossible and would destroy the US economy."
We survived a Great Depression and can survive another meltdown.
"I was talking about friendship and cooperation on tackling global issues."
Nations should work in their own self-interest.
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@SnickleFritz79
I didn't say it was the fault of the US, my point is that isolationism didn't protect the US in the 1940s and it wouldn't protect the US now or in the future.
Trade is irrevocably linked to diplomacy and without embassies throughout the world to aid business links trade would grind to a halt. Put simply, the US cannot feed itself and needs to trade with other countries.
Nations work in their own self-interest already, and it is often very damaging to neighbouring nations.
Medeasbiggestfan 1 year ago
@Medeasbiggestfan A standing army and conscription should be called up only when another nation or enemy is waging war. A military should only be for defensive purposes and not to offend.
By that reasoning, America (like Japan) should be a pacifist country.
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@SnickleFritz79
By engaging in the world, the US can stop wars and prevent attacks before they come to its shores.
Imagine if the US had focused on defence after Pearl Harbour and not helped the allies in Europe. Japan would have conquered Asia and the Nazis would have conquered the USSR and the British Empire, gaining access to British and Soviet nuclear research.
Could the US really have defeated a nuclear armed Hitler who had just conquered much of the world? If so, at what cost?
Medeasbiggestfan 1 year ago
@Medeasbiggestfan The United States entering the European theatre of World War II was not necessary for the sime fact that Nazi Germany never attacked the U.S.
Howver, Japan did attack the U.S. so we had every justification to fight in the Pacific theatre of World War II. The war fought between Hitler, Churchill, and de Gaulle was none of Roosevelt's business.
The only thing Europe did was take America's money, and thought after it ended they wouldnt ever have to repay that debt back to us.
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@Medeasbiggestfan "Could the US really have defeated a nuclear armed Hitler who had just conquered much of the world? If so, at what cost?"
You forget a very big obstacle. It is called the Atlantic Ocean and there is some 3,000 miles of it between North America and Europe. Even if Hitler nuked the USA, he never could have occupied the USA because of the geography and the sheer size and population of the USA.
Hitler couldnt even conquer or occupy the USSR
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@SnickleFritz79
If the US hadn't entered the war when they did, the Nazis would have conquered the USSR. They then would have moved to conquer the British Empire (which included Canada).
Do you really think the Nazis would have stopped at the US border? Even if the US could have resisted, the continental United States would have been devastated, and freedom and democracy would only be accessible to a very small minority of the world's population.
Medeasbiggestfan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Medeasbiggestfan As a matter of fact, no foreign power or country could ever occupy the USA die to its large geographical size and its very large population. 9/11 proved that the USA is not immune to attack, but to occupy, nobody could do that.
Britian could not occupy America in 1776, the Japs tried it in 1941. Impossible.
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Medeasbiggestfan As a matter of fact, no foreign power or country could ever occupy the USA die to its large geographical size and its very large population. 9/11 proved that the USA is not immune to attack, but to occupy, nobody could do that.
Britian could not occupy America in 1776, the Japs tried it in 1941. Impossible.
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@Medeasbiggestfan It has been tried. During the American Revolutionary War, the colonial militia and the Continental Army alluded the British Army for years. The British had better trained infantry, but that still was not good enough because they didnt knpow the terrain nor did they win the hearts and minds of the colonists. Again, the British tried in 1812, but a total occupation failed the battles Americans lost in Canada, they more than well made up and won back in the U.S.
It cant be done
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@SnickleFritz79
Firstly, the US was the aggressor in the War of 1812. Both in 1776 and 1812, the British didn't really care about America and didn't put its full forces into taking the continent. Also, the British Empire didn’t have nuclear weapons.
The Japanese government couldn't hold out when two of its cities were destroyed by atomic bombs, I doubt any government would. The American people would have risen up against a Nazi occupation, but it was far better to stop the Nazis in Europe.
Medeasbiggestfan 1 year ago
@Medeasbiggestfan "Firstly, the US was the aggressor in the War of 1812. Both in 1776 and 1812,"
Taxation without represntation in parliament and denying human rights of its citizens does make the British the agressor
In 1812, the British illegally boarded American ships and took civilians, and cut off Franco-American trade. That hardly makes the UK innocent.
"Japanese gov couldn't hold out when two of its cities were destroyed by atomic bombed."
They were already losing before being bombed
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@Medeasbiggestfan "the British didn't really care about America and didn't put its full forces into taking the continent."
Oh they cared a lot. Otherwise they wouldnt have moved the entire British Army across 3,000 miles of ocean to fight a war that lasted from 1775 to 1783--- eight years of fighting!
As for the War of 1812, both the USA and the UK were the losers as the winners of that war was Canada.
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@SnickleFritz79
At the start of the American War of Independence, the British did care, but interests in India soon became more important.
The UK blocked Franco-American trade in 1812 because the US was supporting Napoleon (the French dictator) with whom the British Empire was at war.
While fighting the US, the UK defeated Napoleon, after which the British didn't care about blocking trade. If there had been no war in the Americas, the UK would have still stopped the blockade in 1814.
Medeasbiggestfan 1 year ago
@Medeasbiggestfan "The UK blocked Franco-American trade in 1812 because the US was supporting Napoleon"
And what gave your nation the God given right to interfere in the trade and commerce of two other countries?
As I see it, the Brits today like to think that America bullies them to oblivion, but a very very very long time ago, it was your nation that did that to us. Since 1941, the roles between the US and UK have been reversed and it is a taste of your own medicine which you do not like.
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@SnickleFritz79
The US was helping a dictator who was at war with the UK. Had trade continued, Napoleon may have conquered Europe. It is ironic that the self-proclaimed 'land of the free' should have supported Napoleon, who wanted to removed freedom and democracy from the people of Europe.
The US doesn't bully the UK today, although the UK in recent times has followed American policies, but that has changed with the new British government. The UK will no longer blindly follow the US.
Medeasbiggestfan 1 year ago
@Medeasbiggestfan And why shouldn't we have supported France in the Napoleonic Wars? Afterall, it was France that assisted us in gaining our independence. France gave us freedom and democracy. By that token, the French and later Napoleon were the epitome of freedom and democracy, overthrowing the King, chopping his head off, and installing Napoleon as emperor.
Just because France was a perceived threat to the UK, didnt give you the right to dictate to us of who we can have good relations with.
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago 2
@SnickleFritz79
The French replaced one dictator with another, that's not very democratic. They only helped the American colonists because they opposed the British, it had nothing to do with Americans wanting freedom and democracy - the French didn't care about that.
You’re the only who said that countries should act in their own self-interest. It was in the UK’s interest to stop Franco-American trade.
Medeasbiggestfan 1 year ago
@Medeasbiggestfan And you forget, Hitler tried to invae and occupy the USSR. He failed because even though the Soviets had poorly trained soldiers compared to the Nazis, they had a larger military and could afford to lose tens of millions in terms of death.
Also, in World War II, the US economy was triple the size of Nazi Germany's that had much more industrial output. A nation that can build 150,000 Sherman tanks in four years is a well armed country. The Germans would have no chance.
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@SnickleFritz79 I agree with you, I don't give a damn about the world and I don't care if they give a damn about us. I want America to be free of entangling alliances and beholden to all the protectorates in our empire.
Our republic will not survive if we hold onto the empire. And the "special" relationship with Britain ended in 1776. I have no interest in restarting it.
ImaginedWriter 1 year ago
I find it sickening how we invite a Queen who heads a country that is our ancestral enemy.
How quickly Americans forget that it is France that was our first and has been our oldest alliance in our 234 years of existence.
I for one will never forget or forgive. Several British Redcoats raped female members of my family at Brandywine, and then burned the house and barns down amidst the ensuing battle.
Fuck the UK
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@SnickleFritz79
The sins of the father should not be passed on to the children.
Do you think the US and Vietnam should never become friends because of what happened during the Vietnam War? Do you think Germany and Poland should forever be enemies for what happened during the Second World War?
Currently, British and American troops are serving together in Afghanistan, I think that is the true testament to the incredibly close relationship between the UK and US.
Medeasbiggestfan 1 year ago
Comment removed
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
@Medeasbiggestfan A man by the name of George Washington warned the American people and insisted that the U.S. not enter into alliances with foreign countries, get mixed up in world affairs, or engage in foreign wars.
In fact. all of the Founding Fathers advocated for isolationism and insularity The alliance was necessitated due to fighting a common enemy. But that alliance was expected to end once independence was finalized.
No country should have a special relationship with another country.
SnickleFritz79 1 year ago
"I know that the United... Kingdom will be on our side"
Lol, he almost said States :P can't blame him though :) just an automatic brain thing.
theguymjp 1 year ago
It wasn't for the British empire, America would never have existed the way it did.
ocean3da 1 year ago 4
Comment removed
taytaystrk 2 years ago
No, he addressed HRH Prince Philip and basically invited him to toast the Queen. Obviously he was not going to invite her for her own toast...that would have been funny.
jgh37 2 years ago
@ProvocatedHoax: It's nonsens what you're saying ! Or it's the fact that I'm a nobleman. It's wrong that today the power of reign countries lies with the citizen of countries. The power has to be in the hands of Kings, Queens en the Nobility ! Long live the Queen and Aristocracy !
Gandalf4568 2 years ago
Hey look! It's a descendant of that Island country whose ass we kicked out of ours.
Kings, Queens & other so-called nobility(ha ha) who think themselves worthy to rule over others are not worthy enough to even lick my dogs ass.
All "royalty" can go to hell and I thank the gods that my ancestors beat your asses 200+ years ago, and if you ever rear your pathetic, weak tyrannical heads up again then we'll be glad to kick your asses for a 3rd time. The war of 1812 in case you've forgotten.
BloodTar 2 years ago
@BloodTar: If you hate Monarchy and Nobility, why are you looking to this video's ? If you can't bare it, just don't look...
And futher, you are so republican... You're pathetic and stupid.
Royalty and Nobility are destined to rule (het gepeupel, as we say in Dutch) it means, the little people, normal stupid humans. We are superior to them en we have the capacity etc. to rule and dominated them !
Gandalf4568 2 years ago
Hey shit for brains! I'm not a Republican or Democrat. Why don't you try ruling over your toilet. You have no "capacity to dominate" anyone. You can give a badge, gun and authority and the title of police officer to any high school grad and I guarantee you that he/she will dominate and rule over your weak Dutch ass, but in no way does it make him/her superior just because they dominate you.
BloodTar 2 years ago
Comment removed
jgh37 2 years ago
Puke.FTQ.
WolfArden44 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck the crown
LTBL88 2 years ago
Who is that appalling sychophant who keeps starting the applause?
fendweller 3 years ago
haha, that's 41st Vice President Nelson Rockefeller. He was a great Governor of New York, not a great clapper.
14691 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Britain is and will remain the ancestral enemy of the United States and this woman in the ugly yellow frock is the descendant of the tyrant and criminal George III. If I were a guest at that dinner I would have taken a gun to her head and blow her brains out.
YogaNate79 3 years ago
George III was indeed a tyrant. I'm not sure about the rest of what you typed...
14691 3 years ago
YogaNate79 - "If I were a guest at that dinner I would have taken a gun to her head and blow her brains out". Dream on sonny, dream on. You'd be lucky to be invited to the local soup kitchen.
adamswampy 2 years ago 2
Hey Yank, I'd just love for you to say that when I'm in earshot...
SAS: Who Dares Wins
Rentaghost76 2 years ago
I wish you were in earshot. Because I would definitely dare and I would definitely win.
BloodTar 2 years ago
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!
allends612 3 years ago 3
Fascinating. God bless the UK and the USA!
dondonp12004 3 years ago 20
@dondonp12004 and you sir missed the point
werdnanivrag 1 month ago
@werdnanivrag Me? Come on! What I meant is that I love the United Kingdom as much as I love the United States of America. We Americans and Britons share the same three colors of our respective national flags. I even studied there at Leeds College of Music back in 2007-2008 when I got accepted there and rejected from Western Washington University in Bellingham after a series of piano auditions.
dondonp12004 1 month ago
GODS SAVE HER MAJ AND THE ROYAL FAMILY!
beowulfsword08 3 years ago 4
1 star because I cannot rate this piece of shit suggestion any lower. The Video is FANTASTIC, the Queen is wonderful and seeing cooperation between America and the UK is amazing.
You infowars tards need to loosen those fuckin tin foil caps and live in the real world for a change.
God Save the Queen!
May she rule forever.
JohnnyH1982 3 years ago 9
@JohnnyH1982 queens and kings are a thing of the past, but some of us europeans have still to pay the price from the dark middle ages. Monarcy and democracy are uncompatible in my view. If we are all the same, then there should be no queen/king and all the expensive shit that goes with it paid for by the peasants.
pakkinen 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JohnnyH1982 What an idiot. You actually think these elitists care about you? Fool. Their attitudes havent changed nor will they ever change. The rhetoric and methods have changed over time to reflect the changes in society but at its core its still predatory.
ColdCypher 1 year ago
@JohnnyH1982 Look at these disgusting bastards, swine!! They should be executed!! They need to be- f'ing little minions of the Rothschilds surpressing the English & world. This bastard Royal family is worth over $100 trillion!!! They keep it a secret & lead you to think B. Gates is the worlds richest man so the focus will be off them!!! Ah,ha,ha,ha! What bastards!! What CUNNING bastards!! They're plundering the U.K. & europe with their banking interest control! These maggots are Hitlers killem
bombcaryah 11 months ago
@bombcaryah LOL...100 trillion eh? That's some serious cash, too bad there isn't that much money in the entire world let alone held by a family.
HereinLasVegas 9 months ago
@JohnnyH1982 you sir need to understand what a crime the federal reserve is.
werdnanivrag 1 month ago
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!!!!!!
konstantinop 3 years ago 5
what a great video. Go President Ford!!!
jaroland110 3 years ago
Britain isn't a tyrannical, it never was.
Medeasbiggestfan 3 years ago
are you fucking joking
scientistwriter 3 years ago
No I'm not. The British system of government hasn't changed much in more than 300. In 1776, as now, it was the elected Prime Minister who had all the power. Poor old King George gets all the blame even though he was just a figurehead.
Medeasbiggestfan 3 years ago
OH REALLY????
You live in the UK and are totally brainwashed like the rest of Europe.
Guess what? THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE RULE YOU! AND YOU ARE THEIR SLAVE AND THE GOVERNMENTS ARE JUST FRONTS!
Why is it that the "politicians" in the UK have to take an oath of allegiance to the queen, and not to the people? Because it is the queen's government! Not yours!!!
Haven't you ever heard the queen say, "my government, or my people, or my soldiers??"
You are a slave in the economy my friend.
scientistwriter 3 years ago
What load of rubbish.
The Queen only says "my government" when giving the Queen's speech, which is written by the democratically elected Prime Minister. If she does write them herself she's schizophrenic, sounding like Thatcher in the 80s and Blair in the 90s.
And if Europe is run by its royal families, how come most European countries are republics?
I really do wonder where do people get these nonsensical conspiracy theories?
SuperTrekNerd 3 years ago
your view of our nation its monarchy and government is quite wrong, we maybe here people but she is our queen she works in our interestes and if they step a foot wrong they get their head choped of like the last time.
rulebritannia1 3 years ago 3
I actually hope for a young, nationalistic king who will ruthlessly seize power by force and kill the traitors by hanging them from London bridge.
SirWinstonChurchill 3 years ago 5
i dont, it goes against what the monarchy and this nation is realy about, even for traitors
rulebritannia1 3 years ago
I tend to view monarchy in much the same way Thomas Hobbes did.
Being the king or queen is a messy business... Elizabeth I had no problem getting rid of her enemies. William of Orange was greeted as a liberator. And William the Conqueror... well, let's just say I prefer a more traditional English, less civilized approach to the throne!
SirWinstonChurchill 3 years ago
Not only that, but do you know the EU is effectively governing you?
About 80% of the laws in the UK are made in Brussels. And the lisbon treaty is the EU constitution(the same one France and Holland voted NO on in 05) and even though ireland voted no on that shit the EU is going to bring it in anyway somehow.
Be very careful about a staged attack so they can push it through.
scientistwriter 3 years ago
Wait a minute! Are Europeans slaves of royalty or slaves of the EU?
The monarch hasn't had any executive power since 1689. MPs swear an oath to the Queen because she swore an oath to the people at her coronation.
France and Holland were against the EU constitution because of the constitutional parts, parts which were removed from the Lisbon treaty. Ireland objected because Sinn Fein and others who said it would legalise abortion. But the Lisbon treaty doesn't affect abortion laws at all.
Medeasbiggestfan 3 years ago
The American revolution was against Parliament, not king George. You are correct.
The founders of the USA were ENGLISHMEN like me and they weren't afraid to use propaganda to their benefit, nor were they afraid to die for their "sacred honor" as ENGLISHMEN in rebellion.
The Stars and Bars, Old Glory and Union Jack are red, white and blue for a reason...
SirWinstonChurchill 3 years ago 5
The word is "honour".
TremcladClock 3 years ago 2
Leaders who have no emotion and do not understand love or compassion. Congratulations on such an achievment.
kingrexrex666 3 years ago
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!!!!
konstantinop 3 years ago 4
evil on tv.. really bad to see how fast people forget which enemy their families defeaded once..
fumanshu888 3 years ago
So why does the date say 07/07/1976? Huh? DID ANYBODY ELSE NOTICE THAT THIS ISN'T A FOURTH OF JULY TOAST???????????????????????????/
pennilesshippo 3 years ago
The 4th July. I remember all the victims of so many decades and centuries of American Imperialism!
SerbianSOCIALIST 3 years ago
socialist hahaha,,commie light..
pipesmoker76 3 years ago
what a ass kisser ford was... how about a toast to jon adams, george washington,thomas jefferson.. ?
pipesmoker76 3 years ago
Sorry, they weren't there!
felumanyc 3 years ago 2
Thank you for sharing this...
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!!!
324wilson 3 years ago