haha, best from this series, good stuf, i Llol'd from this and the frustration... hell im loling now. good stuff and keep em coming, Subd and ill pass it on. TY
i think most people are braindead and it really shows how stupid the population is really getting . I bet More the 85% of people who commented on this have no education .
@seangervais85 Education has nothing to do with intelligence..and one that would bet on something he has no informations on..well..let's just say he surely is not really bright himself.. neither is one spending his precious* time insulting other people..while he could put his time and ''intelligence'' to good use... but hey..it's free world..remember?or at least it should be if it weren't for so many people of your kind. Peace :)
we were learning a topic on consciousness in psychology this week, and I'm sad to say we didn't discuss anything that has to do with consciousness, what an abserd, I feel kinda bad about that
@thelister4910 it was a year ago, and now im studying maths instead of psychology... but i think they assume that consciousness is an illusion. all the science in the world you ever gonna learn today, you are gonna be told that the only thing in the whole universe that exists is the physical universe that we know. atoms, fabrick of space (thanks to Einstein), particles... but what about consciousness? they want you to assume that its an illusion, I ask how is it possible to have an illusion?
i think that reality is not what everyone thinks it is. because the fact that we exist is actualy stranger than saying that there is god out there. because imagine if you can, nothingness, how did we get from nothing to now? it might not even be possible, maybe we always existed because it is not possible to come from nothing. but u see, that is very stange to say that there was never a begining. it means we are infinately old. but there must be a begining, it had to come from somewhere
here is a thought experiment: lets say in the begining there was nothing at all, there was no time, no fabrick of space even, absolutely nothing. then universe came to existance. how long was there no universe? well, time didn't exist before universe came to existance, but if there was nothingness in the begining it had to be there for some time, right? I say nothingness lasted infinately small time which is the same as saying it lasted for 0 amount of time, which means there was no begining
the only reason we are here is because in the begining there was nothing, which actually is not true (because nothingness was there for 0 amount of time). ask urself how did we come to existance? maybe we didnt? see it actually makes more sense to say that you can't get something out of nothing then to say that you get the universe out of nothing. thats why I think that maybe we dont exist, but we are here, right? i find that strange.
I assume in the begining there was nothing, because I think it makes sense to say that everything must have a begining, and to say that in the begining there was nothing at all, i think it is logical. on the contrary we always existed which is illogical and very strange. these questions are being completely overlooked by scientists and the question of how is it possible to have an illusion or an experience is just as difficult. scientists want to think that they know everything about reality
and they say that consciousness is an illusion, as if that explains everything... well, I don't think it is an illusion, I think that is an idiotic assumption
@Zee96969696 Well you really didn't answer my question. As to what you said though, our perception of reality really is an illusion if you want to get technical about it. The things we see are not in the present, we don't experience things as they happen, but afterwords. It takes a bit of time for the light to bounce off something into your eye, and more time for your brain to process it. Our brain also filters out information, so we never truly experience reality exactly as it is.
@thelister4910 yea, we learned about that in physics, but how is it possible to be able to be conscious of something? science cannot answer that question, instead scientists wan't you to think that we are not conscious of anything at all. they want you to think our brains are computers, our brains are like robots. they think they can explain everything with their theories, but their theories can't explain everything
@Zee96969696 How is it possible to be able to stand there? Science and god cannot answer this question.
I feel the statement I made above is just as valid as yours. I don't know what you are trying to ask when you say how is it possible you can be conscious. How is it possible that there is a planet?
No scientist thinks they can explain everything with their theories, you are extremely wrong there. Scientists aren't know-it-alls, they have questions and thoroughly search for answers.
@thelister4910 well I think scientists want to think the world is round and the only thing that exists is particles that make up atoms, and thats all there is to it. i like to think there maybe more out there, maybe ghosts are real you know... but a scientist doesn't want to think that ghosts may be real, scientist want to think there are only atoms and nothing more
@Zee96969696 Again you are 100% wrong. Scientists don't want anything but the truth. Most of them are very open to anything, provided you have evidence. If all you have are your beliefs than that doesn't mean that much to others. If you can show consistently some evidence for ghosts etc. scientists would be fascinated by this phenomenon and start observing it and trying to figure it out. They don't want to believe all there are is atoms... it's just that is what is obviously there.
@Zee96969696 Ok well you're wrong lol. If you are talking to a scientist who won't look into something related to their field that is repeatable and not known to science, who would rather ignore it and believe in "atoms" then you aren't talking to a real scientist.
Many for some reason think scientists are out to prove the current views of science. They aren't, they objectively look for the truth.
@thelister4910 yes you're right about that. what i'm saying though is that alot of scientists think that what they have already provan is like all there is in the world. a scientist never admits that maybe we have souls, but theres no way to know if we have souls, but so many scientists want to beleive that we don't have souls. do you understand what i'm saying? it's hard to explain. what we learn in psychology is that consciousness must be an illusion, there's big emphasis on that, it's wrong
@thelister4910 do you know the history of how string theory was developed? or how any new idea at first gets just about every scientist to ridicule the person with the new idea. new ideas whould be imbrased, but instead scientists discourage thinking outside of the box... perhaps you just don't see that side of human nature. but its wrong to continue to discourage new crazy wacky ideas, such as aliens, big foot, ghosts, souls, etc. or string theory, parralel universes, extra dimensions
@thelister4910 just like you said. scientists are not interested in believes, scientists are interested in evidence, replecatable evidence... see thats what I'm saying, that's a good way to learn about reality, but as people we should never rely only on that, theres a bigger world out there than what we can prove and show evidence for, that's what I'm saying. alot, not all, but alot of scintists have too much of a grip on scientific view, they reject anything that is not scientific
@Zee96969696 Yes, what is wrong with rejecting everything besides reality? Instead of believing in orbs just because it's a nice idea for example, why not look for the evidence that orbs are some sort of energy in a different frequency vs that they are normal particles in the air? Why do we need anything but reality? What is the benefit of believing in things that are not real? If orbs ARE entity or energy, let the evidence show this. We don't need to "believe" in orbs if they are not real.
I will tell you why. because I believe that consciousness is real, it maybe made up of many consciousness moments that happen in our brains and maybe somewhere else in universe, or it maybe one thing, but I beleive that consciousness is real, we really are consciouss and it is not an illusion. But science cannot prove that consciousness is real, and therefore many scientists choose to believe that it is an illusion. I ask how is it possible to have an illusion if consciousness is an illusion?
also we must not forget that there are always more things out there to discover. things that are outside of any laws of nature. things that scientists today want to reject as having any possibility of existing. when Eistein came up with theory of relativity, he thought he discovered the theory of EVERYTHING, but atoms don;t behave the way his theory predicted, and he didn't want that to be the case. We want to know everything, we gotto know that reality is more complicated than what we know
@Zee96969696 This is where you are wrong, scientists don't "want to reject" things having "any possibility of existing". They just want the truth. If something exists, show them the evidence and they will update any relevant theory to integrate the new info into it. That is science. If you have no evidence and can't find any, there is no reason to believe in it.
@thelister4910 look, science is a really great system for discovering reality, and what your'e saying is good. what i'm saying though, you might never have come accross it. Most scientists ridicule other scientists who may beleive in UFOs, for example, u might not know about that, but that's true. But today believing in aliens is normal, but not beleiving in UFOs, in the past if you beleived that aliens exist and u are a scientist, u better not tell anyone, otherwise scientists wil discredit u
@thelister4910 science is great, and scientists as people who want to find the truth have evolved into 'great truth finders', but i'm just saying science could be better if scientists realised that anything is possible. you might not agree with me, but I think many (most) scientists don't beleive that truly anything is possible. Stop ridiculing people with wacky ideas, stop discrediting wacky ideas. I think that evolution is happening though already
I don't like to go to a psychology class and have all the teachers discredit the idea that consciousness is real. You tell me, do you beleive in consciousness? or do you think that it is an illusion, just like so many scienttific people think that it is an illusion for no good reason. You answer me that question. I don't see any way it could be an illusion. But the reason scintists think it is an illusion is because saying that it is real does not agree with any scientific thery, undersand?
By far my favorite trailer scene, for i ask those same questons almost on a daily basis. I cant remember the last time i was considering reality and consciousness and laughed my ass off at the same time. Well done and thank you
so i guess you can laugh at all the medicines, oil, plastics, chemicals, electricity, pretty much everytjhing that life depends on.......yeah. make fun of science and scientists.
So, can I buy this movie? I will. I'll buy the DVD. I loved What The Bleep, and I get what you guys are doing here, (you haters - you defenders of "real" science you) but i still appreciate intellectual comedy - i wanna buy it. email me.
@ jonathanlippe- lol you are some kind of idiot. What the Bleep is the biggest load of bullshit ever.. the indians and the ship? lol what an idiot, yes you do appreciate intellectual comedy, that's pretty much what What the Bleep is, comedy, at least for me it was.
@dictator4rent - "no you are the ball-licker". Have you ever looked at a "Where's Waldo" book? You don't see Waldo until it's pointed out to you, and then you see him all the time. Or one of those optical illusion questions. Once you see it, you see it. I'm willing to fight to the death to defend What The Bleep, so you can throw anything you want and i'll explain. In the end all I ask is for you to admit you are a secret disinfo agent trying to discredit something that liberates mankind.
now, jonathanlippe, here's my own debunking of several of the more ridiculous points made by the movie: 1) that the Indians could not see Colombus' ship because they had never seen ships before... okay, first of all, is there ANY evidence for this??? if there is, please share. secondly, this is just bullshit from any perspective... your Waldo example is actually quite pathetic, since the whole point of Waldo is that he's supposed to be extremely hard to spot...
You terribly misunderstand (probably intentionally) the message. If you're focusing on the evidence, you must be a secret agent - because this is their technique. The idea is to conceive new perceptions, a new way of thinking, the power of new conceptual frameworks, paradigm shifting. People used to think the world was flat - if I said it was round you'd be demanding where is my evidence because you'd be supporting the old world view as you do now.
The point of Waldo is not only that he's supposed to be extremely hard to spot - that is the surface idea - the idea that stupid masses of people cling onto. The bigger idea of Waldo is to show conceptually the way your vision and mind works. Before you know where Waldo is, it is hard to find him. Once you know where he is, you're able to find him all the time - your mind changes and shifts. That is what WTB is all about. Providing you the ability to see more of what is out there.
...the ships were enormous and in plain sight. if you go by that logic, i hadn't seen an airplane until i was 5 or so, so that must mean that i was unable to see any airplanes the first time i went to the airport?... right. okay, secondly, the thing about how putting words on a bottle of water changes the water itself... do explain, what physical force causes the water molecules to change shape? (hint: it has to be a force that actally exists)...
There may be flying saucers all around you and because you've been constantly told that aliens don't exist you are unable to perceive their existence. (that's to be funny with you.) Perception Management is a real thing. Archimedes conceived the idea of displacement. Once an idea is conceived, then it is made visible and perceived.
As far as a force that actually exists - I know Over Unity (Perpetual Motion) exists but you'll never agree with me because you're mind is in a box.
As far as the water on the bottle - your intention causes the water molecules to change shape - you are the observer. Your observation changes the reality. (Shrodingers Cat experiment) You affect the planet! So if you realize that you can affect water molecules ... what else can you affect? If "they" already knew this, then THEY have been manipulating our minds to create THEIR reality. CREATE YOUR OWN - YOU ARE A CREATOR - not a vessel for the controllers to use to create their world.
anyways I thought the youtube video i showed you did a good enough job debunking the whole water thing. but now on to the single most ridiculous part of the whole movie, the claim that that blond woman with a bad accent CHANNELED THE SPIRIT OF THE 35,000-YEAR OLD ATLANTEAN GOD RAMTHA. okay, first understand that EVERYONE involved in the making of this movie belongs to the ramtha cult and supports the idea that JZ knight (the blond woman) is truly able to channel the spirit of Ramtha.
I'll agree. The Ramtha thing is of monumental ridiculousness. They weren't pushing Ramtha in the movie though. They had that blond woman with the fake accent discuss some interesting ideas. I don't let the cult member thing distract me from the idea in the movie that we all create reality. I only do that when its an obvious left wing agenda (or right wing agenda). As long as individual creation is the agenda being pushed I support it. Abundance and creation.
To make it clear, I do not support Ramtha or JZ Knight or am a member of their silly cult. When you present new information that is life changing and can disrupt society, you MUST put something ridiculous in the film so that the movie can be ridiculed - so that people who are scared have a back door to write the whole thing off as nonsense because it damages their limited perspective of reality. You will notice all conspiracy theorists all intentionally put 1 hole in their theories.
so that means that basically, in order to believe anything that WTB says, you have to believe the following two premises: 1) the ancient god ramtha exists, and 2)JZ Knight (the blond woman) has the ability to channel Ramtha's spirit. If you believe either of those premises, then I truly do not know why I am bothering to argue with you. If you see how ridiculous those premises really are, then you will accept that WTB is a load of tripe,
I don't need to believe anything that Ramtha or JZ Knight say in order to gain from WTB. To me, its all about Fred Alan Wolf. I blank out and ignore JZ Knight. If you let her ruin the entire film for you, again, you must be attempting to discredit WTB because you fear what would happen if people knew they could create their own reality and think for themselves instead of remaining society driven cows. I block out JZ Knight. I thoroughly take in Fred Alan Wolf. Fred Alan Wolf is king.
For someone to be protecting the scientific heritage - you sure utilize fallacies of logic (most likely intentionally) to discredit the discussion by pointing out things I care nothing about - - i dont care about Ramtha - i also don't care too much about the water molecule example. I do care about 4 billion bits of data entering your eyes and your mind rejecting the majority of it. I do care about superposition theory. I do care about our ability to manifest reality. Empower humans.
no--i don't think you understand. The movie was WRITTEN, DIRECTED, FILMED, and FUNDED BY students of Ramtha's School of Enlightment, ie JZ Knight's cult. Everything you took from WTB was conceived by worshipers of Ramtha. Nice. The water experiment- how come every time scientists attempt to duplicate the experiment, it doesn't work? Is it because they are too "closed-minded," they aren't "thinking outside the box?" - i see, therefore the water didn't respond to them. makes sense.
@dictator4rent The Indian story: Parable for Perception. Jedi Qui Gon Jinn said, "Your Focus Becomes Your Reality". Evidence? I don't believe any historical evidence. When you do that, you enable the conquerors to propagandize your mind with their version of reality. I question Dinosaur Bones and Egyptian escavations. How do I know the dinosaur bones weren't planted there or the Sphinx was buried in sand and then escavated to create the archeology industry to get onto foreign lands legally
I stand behind every single word Fred Alan Wolf says. So lets see if you can knock Fred Alan Wolf off of the "top greatest thinking people living" perch that I have him on.
@jonathanlippe- first i want to address the whole Ramtha thing. this is a direct quote from wikipedia (please don't give me some bs about how wikipedia is not a reliable source, if you really want me to find a more "reliable" source that says the same thing, i would be glad to): "Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente: all of these individuals are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment." enough said
now i'll address the whole indians thing, in my opinion it's almost as ridiculous as ramtha. anyways, you've given me quite a few examples as to why what they said makes sense, but none of them are really the same thing. i see you've now backed off the waldo thing a little, now you're claiming that its just a conceptualization. but i won't press the issue, since it was a bad example in the first place. i also notice you didn't attempt to refute my airplane example. please do.
I thought you were just trying to make ridicule me with the airplane example. I asked a 6 year old child as a plane flew over our head if he found it amazing to see a flying vehicle and how neat it is that it doesn't fall out of the sky. He said, no, its not amazing, it has an engine and he didn't question the idea that a big 757 was flying over our head. You've never been to space but believe we've been to space because of the evidence of photos. How do you the pictures aren't fake?
anyways, you also gave the flying saucer example. basically what you're saying is that if aliens come to earth in a flying saucer and i happen to be standing outside as it flies by 100 feet above me, i will be unable to see the flying saucer. i will look into the sky and see clouds. truly fascinating. that also begs the question, if that scenario happens, will i be able to hear the flying saucer? hmm good question.
When you become aware of a concept, your perception is heightened and you begin to see it. Television is people's shaman. I'll discover something on my own and express it to people - people will tell me to shove it up my ass and call me weirdo or whatever - and then 5 years later its on television and suddenly everyone is acting like they knew it all along. Your premise with all of this evidence and science is that we have everything all figured out - we don't. Its naive to think we do.
when i asked for evidence for the claim about indians, you were unable to provide me with evidence. i ask you then, if there is no evidence whatsoever for their claim, then why on earth would you believe it??? don't tell me that evidence is useless, evidence IS THE REASON WE BELIEVE THE THINGS WE DO. evidence is the reason we know that they are not just making it up. without evidence, how are we to say that they did not simply make the whole thing up? hmmmm?
You Tube doesn't provide enough space to write the things I'd like to enlighten you with. First off, evidence matters in science. I have experienced a lifetime of paranormal events that I've had assholes like you try to convince me didn't happen - when they did in fact happen - and I am able to provide "evidence" for all of the events - for instance: I've had two out of body experiences that i fully recollect and can recreate the entire settings and have people verify it - but this disturbs
You haven't the least conception of what "evidence" means in science. Your personal recollections of what you experienced don't count for anything. Claims have to be reproducible and verifiable under rigorous standards of evidence by any other independent party who wants to test it. Hollering about how mean people are for not taking you at your word gets your nowhere. Except sometimes a shrink's office - have you considered that, actually?
Its a good example you used, and a good reason why we shouldnt just take someones word for it.
My question is why are all of you scientist / science evangelist missionary crusaders spending all of your time on a What The Bleep video comment section attacking the believers of Quantum Theory? I also know in science all new ideas go through rigorous debate -and there are many hoaxers out there (generally scientists creating disinfo to boost their cause)
@jonathanlippe Most of the people attacking this video do it not because it is a new idea, but because it misrepresents itself as science and has apparently cherry-picked from video interviews with scientists to support ideas and statements contrary to what the scientists believe. The movie seems to be about as accurate a representation of modern science as Bambi is of the North American forest ecosystem. It is a dumbed down fantasy version of science full of misrepresentations and outright lies
@thelister4910 I hear what you are saying. However, if it got the idea across that each of us individually control our own lives, and that we manifest reality, and that its possible that we are having our perception hijacked by a controlling group who understand these unpublished phenomenons, then regardless of the inaccuracies, did it not perform a public good by getting millions of people fascinated with Quantum Theory, and fringe science topics? Did it not empower people?
@jonathanlippe No it did not perform a public service, it pretended to be science to recruit for a dangerous cult. You do not manifest reality with your mind, but with actions, if people believe otherwise it promotes just sitting on your butt hoping and wishing things to happen, instead of going out and doing them the real way. Just like how JZ's husband died of AIDS What if he has sought medical treatment instead of trying to manifest his health? Maybe he wouldn't be dead now.
@jonathanlippe I might add that while the cult DOES say some good things that can help people, the blatant lies they tell and the money they take and lives they destroy do far more damage. They strip from people the ability to think rationally for themselves. I have had members buy expensive cameras to see "orbs" with, and when I show them that "orbs" are just particulate in the air reflecting flash, they literally have no ability to understand me, even though a 6 year old easily could.
@thelister4910 I didn't realize (not you) that people view documentaries at face value. I'm sorry that you've seen people attempt to buy cameras to see orbs. (even if they saw the orbs, then what?). And i didn't realize people (not you) didn't understand that you have to "get up, get out and get something" and that you can't sit around and wish it into existence. Doesn't James Arthur Ray promote "The Universe Loves Action" you have to DO, you can't just sit around?
@thelister4910 I also didn't realize that this became a cult. i don't support "wishing things into existence." I thought it challenged all of us to ask questions and dared us to think differently. I guess why i'm defending WTB is i'm going with the assumption that people who knock WTB believe the nightly news as accurate truth or what they learned in school was true. It's all propaganda. As long as we acknowledge both mainstream and WTB as propaganda, i'm ok. I only believe my own observat
now, i'm glad you brought up the world is flat example. in the 17th century, the predominating view was that the world was indeed flat. at that time, people thought it made sense that the world was flat. but then scientists started to think, and they realized that it was ridiculous to think that the world was flat- it mad no sense. but what made them conclude that the earth is indeed round, and how did they convince the general populace that the earth was round? EVIDENCE.
the point is that you can't convince anyone except the extremely gullible of wacko ideas unless you provide solid evidence - and WTB fails to do so. also, i just noticed what you said about archimedes and displacement, so i'll address that now. archimedes discovered the idea of displacement, and from then on it was used to find the volume of odd-shaped objects. but that notcomparable to LITERALLY not being able to see something like a boat. that's just not being able to understand an idea
People who demand evidence are hiding behind their "established" perspective. Your inability to grasp these concepts because your mind is wrapped in a world based upon rules and laws of nature prohibit you from appreciating the liberation this movie provides to our lives. If you work in established science however it poses a dire threat - because people are starting to realize it isn't WTB that is full of shit - but the scientists who publish based on funding sources.
sorry if you misunderstood, but when i asked you for a real force, i was asking you to name a force that physically causes the water molecules to change shape. you know, like how gravity causes water to seek the lowest point. well, overunity is not a force, it's a state. perpetual motion (not that this is really relevant) is a state in which a motion is continued forever, perpetually. not a force at all, and definitely doesn't explain how the water molecules change shape.
It surrounds us, binds us together, you me, this tree, that rock. You must feel the force. As for the water molecules changing shape .. the force may be a form of gravity that electromagnetically emanates from our mind, body or spirit - we dont know - "what the bleep do we know". So just because I can't name it - doesn't mean it is something that happens. Carl Sagan would refer to "star-stuff". Are you gonna call him out?
the fact of the matter is that in order for a physical change to occur, a force must be acting on an object. basketballs fall because of gravity. they roll to a stop because of friction. etc etc. what force causes water molecules to change shape (and i repeat, it has to be a force that actually exists)?
The movie is called "What The Bleep Do We Know" and the idea they are trying to get across is that both Science and Religion are trying to act as if they have it all figured out - but the implications of Quantum Theory throw everything out the window.
So i dont know the name of the force - it hasn't been named yet - like before Newton what did they call gravity? If we were in the year 1400 and i told you objects fall to the earth you'd demand to know the force. I wouldnt have the name.
I've lived a lifetime of people denying my own experiences. I remember choosing my life in the afterlife dimension - i remember choosing my life from a set of lives - people on Earth absolutely reject what I vividly remember - and THEY THEMSELVES HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF THEIR ORIGIN - YET WANT TO TELL ME THAT I DO NOT RECALL WHAT I ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY REMEMBER. They have no knowledge of their origin, what they're doing here, and where they go when they die - but they'll reject me.
Obviously having experienced what i experience gives me an alternate perspective on reality - they always ask for evidence - i can show pictures i drew as a 2 year old - they all then rationalize it as imagination or something. There is so much more going on than the limited perspective of reality humans have been presented via religion and science. I am living evidence. People fear what they don't know, reject what they don't understand. I recall where I was before I was on Earth - vividly.
" I recall where I was before I was on Earth - vividly."
The homeless guy on the subway last week vividly recalled Jesus coming down from Mars to implant candy corn in his brain. And I vividly recall the passionate three-way I had with Salma Hayek and Juliette Binoche the other night! Are you convinced by either one of us?
Do you remember where you were before you were born? Do you know what you're doing here on Earth? Do you know what happens to your soul when you die? You probably dont have any answers for these YET You have no problem attacking me. Science is important but cannot answer the 3 fundamental questions of existence so you have to go elsewhere to get this info. Now, if your holy science can answer those 3 FUNDAMENTAL questions of existence please enlighten me. Im all ears.
btw - i appreciate what science has done for mankind. i side with science and technology for the most part.. but i've spent a lifetime debating and im on earth to bring the concept of voluntary existence. im just not doing a good job of it. I appreciate the attacks believe it or not because it is helping me see why people arent receptive to the idea. generally i just have religious people attack me who like absolutes. generally scientists are"too important" to bother with theoretical physics.
also, schrodinger's cat is not at all the same thing as the water bottle "experiment." schrodinger's cat is basically just a paradox that states that the cat is simultaneously dead and alive, while we see it as either dead or alive. however, it's never been demonstrated or conclusively proven. also i suggest you watch a youtube video, somehow it won't let me post the link, but anyway its the only video by "williamdebunker", just search that in the search bar and watch the first video you see
It's good that you practice science. We need that - otherwise we'd all be burning witches at the stake. A film like WTB has gotten millions of people interested in science. Isn't that a good thing? OK, so they don't practice "real" science but they mainstreamed it. Now, you might be a total science nerd that wants to keep it a closed society where you control the rules, but sorry pal - WTB has opened the door for millions of quasi wannabe scientists to ruin your party.
@MunchVids Have you ever considered that the presentation method that scientists have used in the past has been lame, boring and ineffectual to communicate to the masses? "oh, well Richard Feynman and Carl Sagan did a great job" but when I try to show them to the masses, they black out. They think Michio Kaku thinks he's cool but realize that he's not. Morgan Freeman seems to be reaching them with "Through the Wormhole". I roll with Giorgio Tsoukalos and Erich Von Daniken on Ancient Aliens.
I like the idea but i wished they had actually taken the time to come with some better material instead of all of them just saying where and what and why. It just wasnt funny and idea like this could have been much funnier if done by actual comedians..........Oh well where can i watch this movie??
dont discount that which is over your head. just because you dont understand the mechanics of quantum physics its realtionship to our "reality", doesnt mean you need to make a numerous series of videos with the same theme over, and over, and over again, pointing out these scientists' akwardness? is that the best you can do to disprove this? pretty sad if you ask me. do some fucking research on the subject, come up with a real counter-argument, and then post something worth our time. thanks
Honestly the monotheideric formula could consult thousands of eras without sandwiches cause h2o... a baby couldnt percieve what i could... plus how could your but do that? you know, wh wh wh what about how? where is it, RABBIT HOLE!
Ok thanks for your comments but it seems that the border between science and philosophy in quantum physic is very thin....Copenhagen int is a theory...an accepted one... but not a proven one .. it has is own critics as well I guess QF is the next level of understanding for humans so no one can be very sure in what he is saying because they all are opinions .. not proven facts It seems that everyone has the imprintig of what they read first... nice social experiment
Man really or u give some explanations to confute the movie theories or u better shut up ..Seriously from a population able to kill millions for books written a couple of thousand years ago debating who's God is the best, I kind of respect who's looking at things in different ways.I am sure somebody was laughing at Colombo when he left to India going in the wrong way in the name of the crazy idea that earth was round. They make money out of it ? hoo J so what about army industry?joke about em.
dude, What the bleep do we know is a bunch of psuedoscientific garbage. They claim that QM is operative in day to day life, and that psychic powers is our mind somehow is using QM in a bastardized version of Bell's theorem involving entanglement. That movie deserves to be ridiculed.
are you stupid? columbus knew the world was round, everybody knew the frickin world was round in his time, they just thought it was a stupid way to go to try to get to india. look it up
Ok thanks for your point, better clarify.. In 1492 it was known but not common knowledge the shape of the earth and the sailers (not exactly oxford graduates) were afraid of sailing with columbus because they were afraid of falling off the edge of the flat planet. My point is always the same in every age of human history there is the unknown that is rejected by the "official" institutions. look up to galileo story if u prefer. Please maintain yourself from insulting somebody u don't even know.
Awesome still false.. sailers of all knew the earth was round do to the sails rising from the horizon. Very very few people, most likely land locked, believed a flat earth. Its not fear of the unknown but contradiction to the political status quo that caused problems to science.
True, it's a modern myth that people in Columbus time believed the eath was flat. Columbus thought the earth was smaller than the leading minds of his day. They already had a pretty good estimation of the size of the planet even at that time.
the chart on the back is their way they see it, make your own version and try to understand it your way.. things are simple, life doesn't change, it simply goes on, it's we the humans who complicate things for ourselves.
phd in... ah... fiber rabbit hole mechanics. Brilliant. IT SHOULDN'T BE THIS COMPLICATED. aaahhh.... I'm still laughing. What if that M is a W now... wtf...
This is f kin brilliant.... WHERE DOES IT GO... IT SHOULDN'T BE THIS COMPLICATED.
This video is hilarious and the acting was spectacular.
jonathanlippe 5 months ago
funniest shit ever.
Metroid225 7 months ago
How can I audition for future episodes???? This is amazing
RawHumourTV 9 months ago
This is bleeping hilarious!!!
...even though I am on board with the stuff this is poking fun at.
The actors are genius, the writing is clever...ahhh.
VinceVetter 9 months ago
This is bleeping hilarious!!!
...even though I am on board with the stuff this is poking fun at.
VinceVetter 9 months ago
haha, best from this series, good stuf, i Llol'd from this and the frustration... hell im loling now. good stuff and keep em coming, Subd and ill pass it on. TY
nazaxprime 1 year ago
What is really funny is that people are using this video as a lauching pad for serious scientific discussion!! LOL
EscapeNewJersey 1 year ago
i think most people are braindead and it really shows how stupid the population is really getting . I bet More the 85% of people who commented on this have no education .
seangervais85 1 year ago
@seangervais85 Education has nothing to do with intelligence..and one that would bet on something he has no informations on..well..let's just say he surely is not really bright himself.. neither is one spending his precious* time insulting other people..while he could put his time and ''intelligence'' to good use... but hey..it's free world..remember?or at least it should be if it weren't for so many people of your kind. Peace :)
GoldenEraTVM 6 months ago
we were learning a topic on consciousness in psychology this week, and I'm sad to say we didn't discuss anything that has to do with consciousness, what an abserd, I feel kinda bad about that
Zee96969696 1 year ago
@Zee96969696 I'm curious, what did you learn about then?
thelister4910 6 months ago
@thelister4910 it was a year ago, and now im studying maths instead of psychology... but i think they assume that consciousness is an illusion. all the science in the world you ever gonna learn today, you are gonna be told that the only thing in the whole universe that exists is the physical universe that we know. atoms, fabrick of space (thanks to Einstein), particles... but what about consciousness? they want you to assume that its an illusion, I ask how is it possible to have an illusion?
Zee96969696 6 months ago
i think that reality is not what everyone thinks it is. because the fact that we exist is actualy stranger than saying that there is god out there. because imagine if you can, nothingness, how did we get from nothing to now? it might not even be possible, maybe we always existed because it is not possible to come from nothing. but u see, that is very stange to say that there was never a begining. it means we are infinately old. but there must be a begining, it had to come from somewhere
Zee96969696 6 months ago
here is a thought experiment: lets say in the begining there was nothing at all, there was no time, no fabrick of space even, absolutely nothing. then universe came to existance. how long was there no universe? well, time didn't exist before universe came to existance, but if there was nothingness in the begining it had to be there for some time, right? I say nothingness lasted infinately small time which is the same as saying it lasted for 0 amount of time, which means there was no begining
Zee96969696 6 months ago
the only reason we are here is because in the begining there was nothing, which actually is not true (because nothingness was there for 0 amount of time). ask urself how did we come to existance? maybe we didnt? see it actually makes more sense to say that you can't get something out of nothing then to say that you get the universe out of nothing. thats why I think that maybe we dont exist, but we are here, right? i find that strange.
Zee96969696 6 months ago
I assume in the begining there was nothing, because I think it makes sense to say that everything must have a begining, and to say that in the begining there was nothing at all, i think it is logical. on the contrary we always existed which is illogical and very strange. these questions are being completely overlooked by scientists and the question of how is it possible to have an illusion or an experience is just as difficult. scientists want to think that they know everything about reality
Zee96969696 6 months ago
and they say that consciousness is an illusion, as if that explains everything... well, I don't think it is an illusion, I think that is an idiotic assumption
Zee96969696 6 months ago
@Zee96969696 Well you really didn't answer my question. As to what you said though, our perception of reality really is an illusion if you want to get technical about it. The things we see are not in the present, we don't experience things as they happen, but afterwords. It takes a bit of time for the light to bounce off something into your eye, and more time for your brain to process it. Our brain also filters out information, so we never truly experience reality exactly as it is.
thelister4910 5 months ago
@thelister4910 yea, we learned about that in physics, but how is it possible to be able to be conscious of something? science cannot answer that question, instead scientists wan't you to think that we are not conscious of anything at all. they want you to think our brains are computers, our brains are like robots. they think they can explain everything with their theories, but their theories can't explain everything
Zee96969696 5 months ago
@Zee96969696 How is it possible to be able to stand there? Science and god cannot answer this question.
I feel the statement I made above is just as valid as yours. I don't know what you are trying to ask when you say how is it possible you can be conscious. How is it possible that there is a planet?
No scientist thinks they can explain everything with their theories, you are extremely wrong there. Scientists aren't know-it-alls, they have questions and thoroughly search for answers.
thelister4910 5 months ago
@thelister4910 well I think scientists want to think the world is round and the only thing that exists is particles that make up atoms, and thats all there is to it. i like to think there maybe more out there, maybe ghosts are real you know... but a scientist doesn't want to think that ghosts may be real, scientist want to think there are only atoms and nothing more
Zee96969696 5 months ago
@Zee96969696 Again you are 100% wrong. Scientists don't want anything but the truth. Most of them are very open to anything, provided you have evidence. If all you have are your beliefs than that doesn't mean that much to others. If you can show consistently some evidence for ghosts etc. scientists would be fascinated by this phenomenon and start observing it and trying to figure it out. They don't want to believe all there are is atoms... it's just that is what is obviously there.
thelister4910 5 months ago
@thelister4910 well I disagree with you on that
Zee96969696 5 months ago
@Zee96969696 Ok well you're wrong lol. If you are talking to a scientist who won't look into something related to their field that is repeatable and not known to science, who would rather ignore it and believe in "atoms" then you aren't talking to a real scientist.
Many for some reason think scientists are out to prove the current views of science. They aren't, they objectively look for the truth.
thelister4910 5 months ago
@thelister4910 yes you're right about that. what i'm saying though is that alot of scientists think that what they have already provan is like all there is in the world. a scientist never admits that maybe we have souls, but theres no way to know if we have souls, but so many scientists want to beleive that we don't have souls. do you understand what i'm saying? it's hard to explain. what we learn in psychology is that consciousness must be an illusion, there's big emphasis on that, it's wrong
Zee96969696 5 months ago
@thelister4910 do you know the history of how string theory was developed? or how any new idea at first gets just about every scientist to ridicule the person with the new idea. new ideas whould be imbrased, but instead scientists discourage thinking outside of the box... perhaps you just don't see that side of human nature. but its wrong to continue to discourage new crazy wacky ideas, such as aliens, big foot, ghosts, souls, etc. or string theory, parralel universes, extra dimensions
Zee96969696 5 months ago
@thelister4910 just like you said. scientists are not interested in believes, scientists are interested in evidence, replecatable evidence... see thats what I'm saying, that's a good way to learn about reality, but as people we should never rely only on that, theres a bigger world out there than what we can prove and show evidence for, that's what I'm saying. alot, not all, but alot of scintists have too much of a grip on scientific view, they reject anything that is not scientific
Zee96969696 5 months ago
@Zee96969696 Yes, what is wrong with rejecting everything besides reality? Instead of believing in orbs just because it's a nice idea for example, why not look for the evidence that orbs are some sort of energy in a different frequency vs that they are normal particles in the air? Why do we need anything but reality? What is the benefit of believing in things that are not real? If orbs ARE entity or energy, let the evidence show this. We don't need to "believe" in orbs if they are not real.
thelister4910 5 months ago
I will tell you why. because I believe that consciousness is real, it maybe made up of many consciousness moments that happen in our brains and maybe somewhere else in universe, or it maybe one thing, but I beleive that consciousness is real, we really are consciouss and it is not an illusion. But science cannot prove that consciousness is real, and therefore many scientists choose to believe that it is an illusion. I ask how is it possible to have an illusion if consciousness is an illusion?
Zee96969696 5 months ago
also we must not forget that there are always more things out there to discover. things that are outside of any laws of nature. things that scientists today want to reject as having any possibility of existing. when Eistein came up with theory of relativity, he thought he discovered the theory of EVERYTHING, but atoms don;t behave the way his theory predicted, and he didn't want that to be the case. We want to know everything, we gotto know that reality is more complicated than what we know
Zee96969696 5 months ago
@Zee96969696 This is where you are wrong, scientists don't "want to reject" things having "any possibility of existing". They just want the truth. If something exists, show them the evidence and they will update any relevant theory to integrate the new info into it. That is science. If you have no evidence and can't find any, there is no reason to believe in it.
thelister4910 5 months ago
@thelister4910 look, science is a really great system for discovering reality, and what your'e saying is good. what i'm saying though, you might never have come accross it. Most scientists ridicule other scientists who may beleive in UFOs, for example, u might not know about that, but that's true. But today believing in aliens is normal, but not beleiving in UFOs, in the past if you beleived that aliens exist and u are a scientist, u better not tell anyone, otherwise scientists wil discredit u
Zee96969696 5 months ago
@thelister4910 science is great, and scientists as people who want to find the truth have evolved into 'great truth finders', but i'm just saying science could be better if scientists realised that anything is possible. you might not agree with me, but I think many (most) scientists don't beleive that truly anything is possible. Stop ridiculing people with wacky ideas, stop discrediting wacky ideas. I think that evolution is happening though already
Zee96969696 5 months ago
I don't like to go to a psychology class and have all the teachers discredit the idea that consciousness is real. You tell me, do you beleive in consciousness? or do you think that it is an illusion, just like so many scienttific people think that it is an illusion for no good reason. You answer me that question. I don't see any way it could be an illusion. But the reason scintists think it is an illusion is because saying that it is real does not agree with any scientific thery, undersand?
Zee96969696 5 months ago
watched what the bleep and it makes sense to me, i guess you guys are just dumb
starseedfrompl 1 year ago 2
@starseedfrompl Do you thin the natives couldn't see the ships when Columbus came on them? Does that makes sense to you?
thelister4910 6 months ago
awesome! my fav so far...
ltleli 1 year ago
By far my favorite trailer scene, for i ask those same questons almost on a daily basis. I cant remember the last time i was considering reality and consciousness and laughed my ass off at the same time. Well done and thank you
josephbron 1 year ago
Pure waste of time and bandwidth :-(
Risenangelicaegis 1 year ago
so i guess you can laugh at all the medicines, oil, plastics, chemicals, electricity, pretty much everytjhing that life depends on.......yeah. make fun of science and scientists.
freespadersuggs 1 year ago
{8} /|\ ~|
h350black 1 year ago
lol
nunogonewild 1 year ago
thats fucking funny ,,,,, hahahahahahahahaha
batalvism 2 years ago
lol flamewar in the comment section.
can somebody throw in some tough insults to make it go hot?
1schwererziehbar1 2 years ago
i keep trying to catch a rabbit in my yard but I just cant do it, it is eating my veggies
Zee96969696 2 years ago 2
So, can I buy this movie? I will. I'll buy the DVD. I loved What The Bleep, and I get what you guys are doing here, (you haters - you defenders of "real" science you) but i still appreciate intellectual comedy - i wanna buy it. email me.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
@ jonathanlippe- lol you are some kind of idiot. What the Bleep is the biggest load of bullshit ever.. the indians and the ship? lol what an idiot, yes you do appreciate intellectual comedy, that's pretty much what What the Bleep is, comedy, at least for me it was.
dictator4rent 2 years ago
@dictator4rent - "no you are the ball-licker". Have you ever looked at a "Where's Waldo" book? You don't see Waldo until it's pointed out to you, and then you see him all the time. Or one of those optical illusion questions. Once you see it, you see it. I'm willing to fight to the death to defend What The Bleep, so you can throw anything you want and i'll explain. In the end all I ask is for you to admit you are a secret disinfo agent trying to discredit something that liberates mankind.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
now, jonathanlippe, here's my own debunking of several of the more ridiculous points made by the movie: 1) that the Indians could not see Colombus' ship because they had never seen ships before... okay, first of all, is there ANY evidence for this??? if there is, please share. secondly, this is just bullshit from any perspective... your Waldo example is actually quite pathetic, since the whole point of Waldo is that he's supposed to be extremely hard to spot...
dictator4rent 2 years ago
You terribly misunderstand (probably intentionally) the message. If you're focusing on the evidence, you must be a secret agent - because this is their technique. The idea is to conceive new perceptions, a new way of thinking, the power of new conceptual frameworks, paradigm shifting. People used to think the world was flat - if I said it was round you'd be demanding where is my evidence because you'd be supporting the old world view as you do now.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
The point of Waldo is not only that he's supposed to be extremely hard to spot - that is the surface idea - the idea that stupid masses of people cling onto. The bigger idea of Waldo is to show conceptually the way your vision and mind works. Before you know where Waldo is, it is hard to find him. Once you know where he is, you're able to find him all the time - your mind changes and shifts. That is what WTB is all about. Providing you the ability to see more of what is out there.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
...the ships were enormous and in plain sight. if you go by that logic, i hadn't seen an airplane until i was 5 or so, so that must mean that i was unable to see any airplanes the first time i went to the airport?... right. okay, secondly, the thing about how putting words on a bottle of water changes the water itself... do explain, what physical force causes the water molecules to change shape? (hint: it has to be a force that actally exists)...
dictator4rent 2 years ago
There may be flying saucers all around you and because you've been constantly told that aliens don't exist you are unable to perceive their existence. (that's to be funny with you.) Perception Management is a real thing. Archimedes conceived the idea of displacement. Once an idea is conceived, then it is made visible and perceived.
As far as a force that actually exists - I know Over Unity (Perpetual Motion) exists but you'll never agree with me because you're mind is in a box.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
As far as the water on the bottle - your intention causes the water molecules to change shape - you are the observer. Your observation changes the reality. (Shrodingers Cat experiment) You affect the planet! So if you realize that you can affect water molecules ... what else can you affect? If "they" already knew this, then THEY have been manipulating our minds to create THEIR reality. CREATE YOUR OWN - YOU ARE A CREATOR - not a vessel for the controllers to use to create their world.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
anyways I thought the youtube video i showed you did a good enough job debunking the whole water thing. but now on to the single most ridiculous part of the whole movie, the claim that that blond woman with a bad accent CHANNELED THE SPIRIT OF THE 35,000-YEAR OLD ATLANTEAN GOD RAMTHA. okay, first understand that EVERYONE involved in the making of this movie belongs to the ramtha cult and supports the idea that JZ knight (the blond woman) is truly able to channel the spirit of Ramtha.
dictator4rent 2 years ago
I'll agree. The Ramtha thing is of monumental ridiculousness. They weren't pushing Ramtha in the movie though. They had that blond woman with the fake accent discuss some interesting ideas. I don't let the cult member thing distract me from the idea in the movie that we all create reality. I only do that when its an obvious left wing agenda (or right wing agenda). As long as individual creation is the agenda being pushed I support it. Abundance and creation.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
To make it clear, I do not support Ramtha or JZ Knight or am a member of their silly cult. When you present new information that is life changing and can disrupt society, you MUST put something ridiculous in the film so that the movie can be ridiculed - so that people who are scared have a back door to write the whole thing off as nonsense because it damages their limited perspective of reality. You will notice all conspiracy theorists all intentionally put 1 hole in their theories.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
so that means that basically, in order to believe anything that WTB says, you have to believe the following two premises: 1) the ancient god ramtha exists, and 2)JZ Knight (the blond woman) has the ability to channel Ramtha's spirit. If you believe either of those premises, then I truly do not know why I am bothering to argue with you. If you see how ridiculous those premises really are, then you will accept that WTB is a load of tripe,
dictator4rent 2 years ago
I don't need to believe anything that Ramtha or JZ Knight say in order to gain from WTB. To me, its all about Fred Alan Wolf. I blank out and ignore JZ Knight. If you let her ruin the entire film for you, again, you must be attempting to discredit WTB because you fear what would happen if people knew they could create their own reality and think for themselves instead of remaining society driven cows. I block out JZ Knight. I thoroughly take in Fred Alan Wolf. Fred Alan Wolf is king.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
For someone to be protecting the scientific heritage - you sure utilize fallacies of logic (most likely intentionally) to discredit the discussion by pointing out things I care nothing about - - i dont care about Ramtha - i also don't care too much about the water molecule example. I do care about 4 billion bits of data entering your eyes and your mind rejecting the majority of it. I do care about superposition theory. I do care about our ability to manifest reality. Empower humans.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
no--i don't think you understand. The movie was WRITTEN, DIRECTED, FILMED, and FUNDED BY students of Ramtha's School of Enlightment, ie JZ Knight's cult. Everything you took from WTB was conceived by worshipers of Ramtha. Nice. The water experiment- how come every time scientists attempt to duplicate the experiment, it doesn't work? Is it because they are too "closed-minded," they aren't "thinking outside the box?" - i see, therefore the water didn't respond to them. makes sense.
dictator4rent 2 years ago
@dictator4rent The Indian story: Parable for Perception. Jedi Qui Gon Jinn said, "Your Focus Becomes Your Reality". Evidence? I don't believe any historical evidence. When you do that, you enable the conquerors to propagandize your mind with their version of reality. I question Dinosaur Bones and Egyptian escavations. How do I know the dinosaur bones weren't planted there or the Sphinx was buried in sand and then escavated to create the archeology industry to get onto foreign lands legally
jonathanlippe 5 months ago
I stand behind every single word Fred Alan Wolf says. So lets see if you can knock Fred Alan Wolf off of the "top greatest thinking people living" perch that I have him on.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
@jonathanlippe- first i want to address the whole Ramtha thing. this is a direct quote from wikipedia (please don't give me some bs about how wikipedia is not a reliable source, if you really want me to find a more "reliable" source that says the same thing, i would be glad to): "Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente: all of these individuals are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment." enough said
dictator4rent 2 years ago
now i'll address the whole indians thing, in my opinion it's almost as ridiculous as ramtha. anyways, you've given me quite a few examples as to why what they said makes sense, but none of them are really the same thing. i see you've now backed off the waldo thing a little, now you're claiming that its just a conceptualization. but i won't press the issue, since it was a bad example in the first place. i also notice you didn't attempt to refute my airplane example. please do.
dictator4rent 2 years ago
I thought you were just trying to make ridicule me with the airplane example. I asked a 6 year old child as a plane flew over our head if he found it amazing to see a flying vehicle and how neat it is that it doesn't fall out of the sky. He said, no, its not amazing, it has an engine and he didn't question the idea that a big 757 was flying over our head. You've never been to space but believe we've been to space because of the evidence of photos. How do you the pictures aren't fake?
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
anyways, you also gave the flying saucer example. basically what you're saying is that if aliens come to earth in a flying saucer and i happen to be standing outside as it flies by 100 feet above me, i will be unable to see the flying saucer. i will look into the sky and see clouds. truly fascinating. that also begs the question, if that scenario happens, will i be able to hear the flying saucer? hmm good question.
dictator4rent 2 years ago
When you become aware of a concept, your perception is heightened and you begin to see it. Television is people's shaman. I'll discover something on my own and express it to people - people will tell me to shove it up my ass and call me weirdo or whatever - and then 5 years later its on television and suddenly everyone is acting like they knew it all along. Your premise with all of this evidence and science is that we have everything all figured out - we don't. Its naive to think we do.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
when i asked for evidence for the claim about indians, you were unable to provide me with evidence. i ask you then, if there is no evidence whatsoever for their claim, then why on earth would you believe it??? don't tell me that evidence is useless, evidence IS THE REASON WE BELIEVE THE THINGS WE DO. evidence is the reason we know that they are not just making it up. without evidence, how are we to say that they did not simply make the whole thing up? hmmmm?
dictator4rent 2 years ago
You Tube doesn't provide enough space to write the things I'd like to enlighten you with. First off, evidence matters in science. I have experienced a lifetime of paranormal events that I've had assholes like you try to convince me didn't happen - when they did in fact happen - and I am able to provide "evidence" for all of the events - for instance: I've had two out of body experiences that i fully recollect and can recreate the entire settings and have people verify it - but this disturbs
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
"First off, evidence matters in science."
You haven't the least conception of what "evidence" means in science. Your personal recollections of what you experienced don't count for anything. Claims have to be reproducible and verifiable under rigorous standards of evidence by any other independent party who wants to test it. Hollering about how mean people are for not taking you at your word gets your nowhere. Except sometimes a shrink's office - have you considered that, actually?
yohei72 2 years ago
Its a good example you used, and a good reason why we shouldnt just take someones word for it.
My question is why are all of you scientist / science evangelist missionary crusaders spending all of your time on a What The Bleep video comment section attacking the believers of Quantum Theory? I also know in science all new ideas go through rigorous debate -and there are many hoaxers out there (generally scientists creating disinfo to boost their cause)
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
@jonathanlippe Most of the people attacking this video do it not because it is a new idea, but because it misrepresents itself as science and has apparently cherry-picked from video interviews with scientists to support ideas and statements contrary to what the scientists believe. The movie seems to be about as accurate a representation of modern science as Bambi is of the North American forest ecosystem. It is a dumbed down fantasy version of science full of misrepresentations and outright lies
thelister4910 6 months ago
@thelister4910 I hear what you are saying. However, if it got the idea across that each of us individually control our own lives, and that we manifest reality, and that its possible that we are having our perception hijacked by a controlling group who understand these unpublished phenomenons, then regardless of the inaccuracies, did it not perform a public good by getting millions of people fascinated with Quantum Theory, and fringe science topics? Did it not empower people?
jonathanlippe 5 months ago
@jonathanlippe No it did not perform a public service, it pretended to be science to recruit for a dangerous cult. You do not manifest reality with your mind, but with actions, if people believe otherwise it promotes just sitting on your butt hoping and wishing things to happen, instead of going out and doing them the real way. Just like how JZ's husband died of AIDS What if he has sought medical treatment instead of trying to manifest his health? Maybe he wouldn't be dead now.
thelister4910 5 months ago
@jonathanlippe I might add that while the cult DOES say some good things that can help people, the blatant lies they tell and the money they take and lives they destroy do far more damage. They strip from people the ability to think rationally for themselves. I have had members buy expensive cameras to see "orbs" with, and when I show them that "orbs" are just particulate in the air reflecting flash, they literally have no ability to understand me, even though a 6 year old easily could.
thelister4910 5 months ago
@thelister4910 I didn't realize (not you) that people view documentaries at face value. I'm sorry that you've seen people attempt to buy cameras to see orbs. (even if they saw the orbs, then what?). And i didn't realize people (not you) didn't understand that you have to "get up, get out and get something" and that you can't sit around and wish it into existence. Doesn't James Arthur Ray promote "The Universe Loves Action" you have to DO, you can't just sit around?
jonathanlippe 5 months ago
@thelister4910 I also didn't realize that this became a cult. i don't support "wishing things into existence." I thought it challenged all of us to ask questions and dared us to think differently. I guess why i'm defending WTB is i'm going with the assumption that people who knock WTB believe the nightly news as accurate truth or what they learned in school was true. It's all propaganda. As long as we acknowledge both mainstream and WTB as propaganda, i'm ok. I only believe my own observat
jonathanlippe 5 months ago
now, i'm glad you brought up the world is flat example. in the 17th century, the predominating view was that the world was indeed flat. at that time, people thought it made sense that the world was flat. but then scientists started to think, and they realized that it was ridiculous to think that the world was flat- it mad no sense. but what made them conclude that the earth is indeed round, and how did they convince the general populace that the earth was round? EVIDENCE.
dictator4rent 2 years ago
Comment removed
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
the point is that you can't convince anyone except the extremely gullible of wacko ideas unless you provide solid evidence - and WTB fails to do so. also, i just noticed what you said about archimedes and displacement, so i'll address that now. archimedes discovered the idea of displacement, and from then on it was used to find the volume of odd-shaped objects. but that notcomparable to LITERALLY not being able to see something like a boat. that's just not being able to understand an idea
dictator4rent 2 years ago
People who demand evidence are hiding behind their "established" perspective. Your inability to grasp these concepts because your mind is wrapped in a world based upon rules and laws of nature prohibit you from appreciating the liberation this movie provides to our lives. If you work in established science however it poses a dire threat - because people are starting to realize it isn't WTB that is full of shit - but the scientists who publish based on funding sources.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
sorry if you misunderstood, but when i asked you for a real force, i was asking you to name a force that physically causes the water molecules to change shape. you know, like how gravity causes water to seek the lowest point. well, overunity is not a force, it's a state. perpetual motion (not that this is really relevant) is a state in which a motion is continued forever, perpetually. not a force at all, and definitely doesn't explain how the water molecules change shape.
dictator4rent 2 years ago
The force is ..... THE FORCE .... from Star Wars.
It surrounds us, binds us together, you me, this tree, that rock. You must feel the force. As for the water molecules changing shape .. the force may be a form of gravity that electromagnetically emanates from our mind, body or spirit - we dont know - "what the bleep do we know". So just because I can't name it - doesn't mean it is something that happens. Carl Sagan would refer to "star-stuff". Are you gonna call him out?
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
the fact of the matter is that in order for a physical change to occur, a force must be acting on an object. basketballs fall because of gravity. they roll to a stop because of friction. etc etc. what force causes water molecules to change shape (and i repeat, it has to be a force that actually exists)?
dictator4rent 2 years ago
The movie is called "What The Bleep Do We Know" and the idea they are trying to get across is that both Science and Religion are trying to act as if they have it all figured out - but the implications of Quantum Theory throw everything out the window.
So i dont know the name of the force - it hasn't been named yet - like before Newton what did they call gravity? If we were in the year 1400 and i told you objects fall to the earth you'd demand to know the force. I wouldnt have the name.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
I've lived a lifetime of people denying my own experiences. I remember choosing my life in the afterlife dimension - i remember choosing my life from a set of lives - people on Earth absolutely reject what I vividly remember - and THEY THEMSELVES HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF THEIR ORIGIN - YET WANT TO TELL ME THAT I DO NOT RECALL WHAT I ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY REMEMBER. They have no knowledge of their origin, what they're doing here, and where they go when they die - but they'll reject me.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
Obviously having experienced what i experience gives me an alternate perspective on reality - they always ask for evidence - i can show pictures i drew as a 2 year old - they all then rationalize it as imagination or something. There is so much more going on than the limited perspective of reality humans have been presented via religion and science. I am living evidence. People fear what they don't know, reject what they don't understand. I recall where I was before I was on Earth - vividly.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
" I recall where I was before I was on Earth - vividly."
The homeless guy on the subway last week vividly recalled Jesus coming down from Mars to implant candy corn in his brain. And I vividly recall the passionate three-way I had with Salma Hayek and Juliette Binoche the other night! Are you convinced by either one of us?
yohei72 2 years ago
Do you remember where you were before you were born? Do you know what you're doing here on Earth? Do you know what happens to your soul when you die? You probably dont have any answers for these YET You have no problem attacking me. Science is important but cannot answer the 3 fundamental questions of existence so you have to go elsewhere to get this info. Now, if your holy science can answer those 3 FUNDAMENTAL questions of existence please enlighten me. Im all ears.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
btw - i appreciate what science has done for mankind. i side with science and technology for the most part.. but i've spent a lifetime debating and im on earth to bring the concept of voluntary existence. im just not doing a good job of it. I appreciate the attacks believe it or not because it is helping me see why people arent receptive to the idea. generally i just have religious people attack me who like absolutes. generally scientists are"too important" to bother with theoretical physics.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
@jonathanlippe So ummmm, why didn't I get to pick my life?
321lawc 2 years ago
maybe you did. what is your first memory of existing?
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
also, schrodinger's cat is not at all the same thing as the water bottle "experiment." schrodinger's cat is basically just a paradox that states that the cat is simultaneously dead and alive, while we see it as either dead or alive. however, it's never been demonstrated or conclusively proven. also i suggest you watch a youtube video, somehow it won't let me post the link, but anyway its the only video by "williamdebunker", just search that in the search bar and watch the first video you see
dictator4rent 2 years ago
It's good that you practice science. We need that - otherwise we'd all be burning witches at the stake. A film like WTB has gotten millions of people interested in science. Isn't that a good thing? OK, so they don't practice "real" science but they mainstreamed it. Now, you might be a total science nerd that wants to keep it a closed society where you control the rules, but sorry pal - WTB has opened the door for millions of quasi wannabe scientists to ruin your party.
jonathanlippe 2 years ago
I am a science nerd and yes quite frankly WTB has ruined science for the general population.
MunchVids 2 years ago 5
@MunchVids Thats how you know its valid
starseedfrompl 1 year ago
@MunchVids Please enlighten me on how ??
seangervais85 1 year ago
@MunchVids that's awesome.
worldofkris 7 months ago
@MunchVids Have you ever considered that the presentation method that scientists have used in the past has been lame, boring and ineffectual to communicate to the masses? "oh, well Richard Feynman and Carl Sagan did a great job" but when I try to show them to the masses, they black out. They think Michio Kaku thinks he's cool but realize that he's not. Morgan Freeman seems to be reaching them with "Through the Wormhole". I roll with Giorgio Tsoukalos and Erich Von Daniken on Ancient Aliens.
jonathanlippe 5 months ago
It's callled a rabbit hole because of Alice in wonderland and the matrix
1990ricky1990 2 years ago
Paul needs to stop chasing rabbits and switch to dragons.
He's the Rick Santelli of physicists.
FunkhouserMemorial 2 years ago
I like the idea but i wished they had actually taken the time to come with some better material instead of all of them just saying where and what and why. It just wasnt funny and idea like this could have been much funnier if done by actual comedians..........Oh well where can i watch this movie??
ZeeL4J8C2 2 years ago
PPPPParticle Pit!!! LOL
clriggs 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dont discount that which is over your head. just because you dont understand the mechanics of quantum physics its realtionship to our "reality", doesnt mean you need to make a numerous series of videos with the same theme over, and over, and over again, pointing out these scientists' akwardness? is that the best you can do to disprove this? pretty sad if you ask me. do some fucking research on the subject, come up with a real counter-argument, and then post something worth our time. thanks
hughes837 2 years ago
hahaha, its all made up!. A load of bullshit, just to satisfy your curiosity.
janekbaranek 2 years ago
@janekbaranek ..... or is it?
jonathanlippe 5 months ago
Honestly the monotheideric formula could consult thousands of eras without sandwiches cause h2o... a baby couldnt percieve what i could... plus how could your but do that? you know, wh wh wh what about how? where is it, RABBIT HOLE!
SiddhiSlickers 2 years ago
Ok thanks for your comments but it seems that the border between science and philosophy in quantum physic is very thin....Copenhagen int is a theory...an accepted one... but not a proven one .. it has is own critics as well I guess QF is the next level of understanding for humans so no one can be very sure in what he is saying because they all are opinions .. not proven facts It seems that everyone has the imprintig of what they read first... nice social experiment
Marcomxx 2 years ago
"where is it??!!"
Jlaker12 2 years ago
Man really or u give some explanations to confute the movie theories or u better shut up ..Seriously from a population able to kill millions for books written a couple of thousand years ago debating who's God is the best, I kind of respect who's looking at things in different ways.I am sure somebody was laughing at Colombo when he left to India going in the wrong way in the name of the crazy idea that earth was round. They make money out of it ? hoo J so what about army industry?joke about em.
Marcomxx 2 years ago
huh?
matahah 2 years ago
dude, What the bleep do we know is a bunch of psuedoscientific garbage. They claim that QM is operative in day to day life, and that psychic powers is our mind somehow is using QM in a bastardized version of Bell's theorem involving entanglement. That movie deserves to be ridiculed.
blackmetalqueer 2 years ago 2
Okay, I can do that.
TWO WORDS for you:
Copenhagen Interpretation
BaileysBeads 2 years ago
are you stupid? columbus knew the world was round, everybody knew the frickin world was round in his time, they just thought it was a stupid way to go to try to get to india. look it up
toferdelachris 2 years ago
Ok thanks for your point, better clarify.. In 1492 it was known but not common knowledge the shape of the earth and the sailers (not exactly oxford graduates) were afraid of sailing with columbus because they were afraid of falling off the edge of the flat planet. My point is always the same in every age of human history there is the unknown that is rejected by the "official" institutions. look up to galileo story if u prefer. Please maintain yourself from insulting somebody u don't even know.
Marcomxx 2 years ago
Awesome still false.. sailers of all knew the earth was round do to the sails rising from the horizon. Very very few people, most likely land locked, believed a flat earth. Its not fear of the unknown but contradiction to the political status quo that caused problems to science.
justinpaoli 2 years ago 2
all this going on what you and I and everybody else was told by somebody else.
nsm2 2 years ago
fuck you
ILoveMakingTutorials 2 years ago
Thank you
I love you !
A big big hug
Marcomxx 2 years ago
True, it's a modern myth that people in Columbus time believed the eath was flat. Columbus thought the earth was smaller than the leading minds of his day. They already had a pretty good estimation of the size of the planet even at that time.
bigsky780 2 years ago
particle pit (2)
rotflmao
and i know the feeling (2)
ashwalk85 2 years ago
lol "i'm the rabbit falling into the hole"......lmao
singerzluv 2 years ago
hilarious
RamoneTalarico 2 years ago
keep working, good so far
dlpariah01 2 years ago
HA! I love it. Very funny.
ivanmikhailov 2 years ago
this is exactly what the COSMIC TRICKSTER used to do in ancient times...... SMASH peoples and societies concepts when they became obsolete.......
mysticradio 2 years ago
the chart on the back is their way they see it, make your own version and try to understand it your way.. things are simple, life doesn't change, it simply goes on, it's we the humans who complicate things for ourselves.
cazzo53 2 years ago
WHERE AND WHERE? AND WHY AN WHY???
:DDDD
What is THIS??? ' M ' ???
: DDDDDD
I'm a RABBIT HOLE!!!! XDD áááááááá
Thatscooool!!
lab22johnny 2 years ago 2
Very nicely cut. Someone knows his thing. :D
tommyLefroy 2 years ago
hes right you cant get any footing...
particle pit.
funkmastafle 2 years ago 7
Dumb as a bunny.
Rexicano 2 years ago
where and what and why and why and how and...
kEvInNaT412 2 years ago
woook wabbit twacks!
ralphisgutz 2 years ago 2
he's a rabbit?
in a hole?
rabbit hole?
rabbits looks different.
i know it.
Speedless73 2 years ago
What the bleep.............?
smileyrox4lyf 2 years ago
good movie go to hmv they usually have it
cucheran666 2 years ago
this 1 and number 4 had me dieing
josh955iracer 2 years ago
rofl. this guy is a crackhead.
kgcgabi 3 years ago 2
lol funny shit
garyweber07 3 years ago 2
what??????
christinemaisie 3 years ago
This is the best one. lol..."particle pit"
gamecube215 3 years ago
Comment removed
byrzaovca 3 years ago
partical tit ROFL
MrCaxus 3 years ago
pit
havok4 3 years ago
these vids are so brilliant
amirtalai 3 years ago
and then?
blesspeacemaker 3 years ago
lmfaoo!
hahaha i starting cracking up at that random laughing he did at the beginning.
this is freakin hilarious.
xChECKeReDx 3 years ago 2
I cried
etypo 3 years ago 8
lol sry for thumbs down
RomanianUser 3 years ago
haha, i saw that stupid movie. funny, funny stuff.
the321321 3 years ago
"where and what and why and why and how!?" haha!
Jesse872 3 years ago
"science is changing, that could be a 'w' now" omg when he said that I actually choked on my pizza!!! LMFAO!.
MoonFaeries 3 years ago
the funniest thing to me is that I thought this was real at first. I thought aww poor guy...lol
teach1982 3 years ago 3
Easy, Buzz Lightyear! To Infinity, and...
the past, the present, the Future, WonderLand, RED GiAnt SEcTOr A, CYGNUS X-1, XANADU, CASSIOPEIA!!! But WHY IS IT SO COMPLICATEEEEEEDDDD!!!!!
eyesandmind 3 years ago
Ladies and gentlemen...Tom Cruise
ismellicecream6 3 years ago 3
OMG, aaaaah hahahahahaha!!!
MoonFaeries 3 years ago
Great, M, Sience is changing that could be W now
Just Great
David1AAA 3 years ago 3
phd in... ah... fiber rabbit hole mechanics. Brilliant. IT SHOULDN'T BE THIS COMPLICATED. aaahhh.... I'm still laughing. What if that M is a W now... wtf...
This is f kin brilliant.... WHERE DOES IT GO... IT SHOULDN'T BE THIS COMPLICATED.
willmprise 3 years ago 2
He should have Yelled "FUCK" at the end, lol
1981z28camaro 3 years ago
He hasn't. Ever.
eyesandmind 3 years ago
but he should have
1981z28camaro 3 years ago
if u watch it all the way through and then watch it again, u compare him at the beginning to him at the end and its sooo funny
fishingfreek105 3 years ago
Lmfao@this dude's nervous breakdown! PARTICLE PIT OF DOOM!!
xxshoelacexx 3 years ago
lol take it easy man
ILoveMakingTutorials 3 years ago