Everyone always bitches about quality... god damn... Most people in 2007 weren't carrying around HD cameras in their fucking pockets. If you don't like it, don't watch the video. Everyone just loves to have something to fucking bitch and moan about.
the point of the video is the comparison . who cares if its in black in whote with no audio . you stills aw who was fasterand by how much . it shows most of you are just missing the point and dont ride bikes or follow f1 . andboth are cool . just diff. 2 wheels and 4 . this was just to see the diff in speed.
If it wasnt a completly soaked track the bike would have won,of course te f1 car would have better traction in the rain over a bike any day but if it was dry the other way around
@kanterretnak Not really shit driver the F1 cars takes the acceleration, offcourse because of lot more traction. But Gp bikes today has lot more topspeeds than f1 cars, In corners an F1 car will also overtake bikes AGAIN due to traction and downforce. But in a drag race the bike will loose a bit in beginning then overtake F1car after a while....There are tracs where GPBikes reach 350+ km/h while F1 cars never in any tracks go past 330 km/h. FACT......
@jaguarxjrs15 Ive seen that video and they have a standing start... Numnuts thats what i said before. accelerationwise an f1 beats a bike anytime. What i said was and read carefully this time, a gpbike of today has greater topspeed, there are circuits where gpbikes reach speeds over 220 mph-350km/h where as a f1 car mostly only reach 205mph-325km/h DUE to so much downforce the rarely go past that. go figure huh...
@jaguarxjrs15 And again honda superbike aint even close to GP bikes.. and ofcourse if the rider cant ride the bike there u have it.... A proper superbike ON TRACK not a flying mile or so does as i said, 350 km/h Ive been fucking following the f1 series and gp series since the mid 80`s till today so i have a grewater clue than you do i think...
@jaguarxjrs15 a superbike is pretty slow compared to a MotoGP bike... So it´s not fair using an roadlegal bike vs and strict super-racing car-when they do A F1 vs a MotoGP bike the F1 will be destroyed topspeedwise.... as in acceleration i think it will be close but round a track F1 will win due to superior grip in corners, hope u grow up to recognize the difference in in topspeed acceleration and cornerhandling u noob..
Thing about it is , it wouldn't be fair. The bike would have the tendancy to wheelie , can't use full power while wheeliing for obvious reason. And the f1 car would have to hit high revs to use full power to keep from spinning out.
haha, who really gives a shit if the quality itsnt that great. why dont all of you people go outside for once! ur all like.. ehhh mah gawd there is like only 5 pixels in thiss!! who. cares! i race motorbikes, its damn good fun but the f1 cars have lots more tecnoligy in them.
I suppose the key for the man in the street is that the MotoGP bike is completely relevant. The average Joe can buy 90% of the experience for 10 grand. An F1 car on the other hand - well it is barely a car to be honest. Not in any sense that your average car driver can grasp. Only millionaires with hypercars can get close.
stupid bikers thinking bikes are better than cars watch most of car vs bike things on youtube and most are victory to cars also do you really honestly think a shiti bike could beat a 0-60 in about 2 secs 220mph car idiots
@chippyarcher You know why dumbass? Caus a car has 4 wheels to get the power on the track. A bike uses only one. Uhh what did you say again? Fuck off.....
@Master1906 I didnt say a f1 does but lots of cars do. its not even worth to discus a bike vs car becaus its not comparable....A bike just has 1 wheel drive so its not comparable at all my friend....
@aponcapone You said a car has 4 wheels to put its power down so you were implying it was 4 wheel drive. And comparing cars to bikes is like comparing apples to oranges, its still interesting to watch.
@Master1906 I agree with you, its intresting to watch but you can not compare a car and a bike....two different things but yes, very cool to watch it.....
some people actually dad a test and found that the only reason a gp bike couldn't beat a formula 1 car in a drag race was because they couldn't get the gp bike to have enough traction.
keep in mind this 1 pixel f1 car looks like it is one of the older turbo era cars which made just insane hp to the point they had to ban turbo's because the cars got too fast.
@slb785 So the car has a better chance, in the dry the bike would whip its ass. Notice the bike caught up in the latter part (when the car is supposed to have the advantage). Good vid
no not at all. the angle of the camera made it look that way a little but all in all the bike should have had better traction in the rain since the F1 has very wide tries that cause it to hydro plain much easier than a bikes thinner tire would (this is simple physics). face it, bikes may be fast but they are not as fast as an F1 car.
@bobbj77 In the dry, the F1 car would gain more surface contact patch for the tyre than the bike would, so would have an even bigger advantage than in this vid. Also, the bike only caught the F1 after the F1 had crossed the finish line and lifted off, plus, the F1 car wouldn't have been set up with low downforce which would've helped the F1 be even quicker in a straight line than it already was. These tests have been done since the 90's in all kinds of conditions and F1 always wins. ;)
I've got to say but you'll notice that the track's wet. Unlikely that the bike was going to win with it like that. I'd like to see it replayed in the dry.
**just a general order of STOCK vehicles; mods may change that, but generally thats how it goes; F1 cars are the kings of the road & 750cc/1000cc bikes are the very close runners-up.
power to weight they are pretty damn close.. but with MotoGP bikes, even tho they might have the traction on the rear on the take off, if they go full out, they will just wheel stand and throw the bike down the road.. also the car has a much larger contact patch with its rear tires aswell for the power to be transfered through
the tech in both the bikes and f1 cars nowadays are absolutely amazing.. i always thought that motorcycles take more skill to ride..but then again...it takes a pair of huge ones to go into a corner at 160+ mph lol
Comparing the 2 on Sepang Malaysia and Catalunya Spain this season. You see MotoGP bikes are faster on the straight. But the F1 cars have faster lap times. Sepang: F1 fastest racelap: 1:37.054 F1 top speed: 303.2 practice 2 MotoGP fastest racelap: 2:02.117 MotoGP top speed: 313.6 practice 2 Catalunya: F1 fastest racelap: 1:24.357 F1 top speed: 312.1 practice 3 MotoGP fastest racelap: 1:43.154 MotoGP top speed: 331.0 practice 2 Resources: formula1.com and motogp.com
did anyone see the track was wet? i have a 06 r1 and on a wet road theres no way you can smash the throttle. you have about 7000 rpms out of 13700 to use. just my 2 cents
@slothmizzy the track was NOT wet you little nerd. I guess you are blind right ? the F1 car did pull a smokey burnout right off the line which would not have happened on a wet track you "expert"
hello lesnar1234 sorry to bother you. i believe this track was not from singapore. the only track we humbly got for the F1 night race are normal road used on daily basis by our singaporean drivers around marina and city hall area which the the race organiser have planned which route or road to be closed for the F1 event usage. correct me if i'm wrong this track i believe came from japan..........do pls accept my humble apologies once again, your humble singaporean......................
@lonelykatana The bike can never show its potential on a track against the F! because it has to brake 150 yards sooner and can't aply full power out of the corners. Well the 990 could only use full power for 10% of track or even less. I've allways wondered what the top speed of a moto gp bike could be if they geared it for a top speed test and had a few miles straight. Having 260 hp and low weight plus aerodynamics, I reckon it could reach maybe 250 mph possibly. Love to see that done.
the restrictions kind of defeat the purpose of f1. it is supposed to be the fastest, the best. its just to to know that technology progress is coming to a stop
the car has a way bigger engine and better power to weight ratio than the bike by comparison
the car would probably be par with the bike on the track, and the bike would certainly win in the canyons. a drag race however is centered around HP and the biggest engine wins
im sure if you took all of the weight and other restrictions off of moto gp bikes then the bikes would outrun the f1 cars. but since they do have restrictions gp bikes havent even tapped their full potential
@fuckyeah009 LOL F1 cars have been mercilessly restricted over the years, especially after the '80s turbo craziness. Current F1 cars are down about 200-250 HP and 2000 rpm down from 5 years ago. If unrestricted, you couldn't even mention anything that is currently road circuit worthy against an F1 car....
F1 cars are only 750-850 HP these days thanks to an evil little troll named Bernie, down from near 1000 HP in the V10 era. But Bernie can't live forever...
@400SA I see, I wonder why they all started downsizing? I doubt it is in the cost because they spend a hell of a lot in develepment on the new engines and try to make as much power as possible.
F1 cars are better and faster, no doubt about it. But a Moto GP bike is frightenly good aswell.
To do 200 MPH must be crazy in a car and Bike. The car creates a lot og G force and on a bike, it really tests your balls when you have wind blowing in the air and the bike shakes and skids.
@400SA Don't get me wrong, I also watch F1, but I haven't followed the details, same with Moto GP.
Basically Moto GP bikes could have been so much faster with the rise in technolgy in recent years and the fact that the reduction in engine size affected the whole bike completely. Weight and the balance of a bike is very important. The power has slowly gone back up to how it was with the bigger engines, but it could have been even more.
people that say that the F1 own thats because it has 4 tires, and the more tires means the more ground surface the vehicle has to grip the ground. The motorcycle has 2 tires, and its still catching up to the car! People that are saying that F1 is better dont drive F1's they are too scared to ride motorcycles
@matman1813sdc wrong- besides from all that you need a headlight, brakelight, turn signals, one hell of a muffler, and probably more depending on your local laws. my point being it would take just as much work to turn a motogp bike street legal as it would an f1 car. cheers.
@pbpwn wrong- here in the uk you dont need a headlight brakelight or turn signals on a daylight mot but you do need a reflector, and yea a muffler like you said
@leieva The bike will never beat.The car has those wings for downforce and at speed can put more power to the tire.GP bikes have incredible power to weight, i think almost 2hp/kg but what good.It might get a better start but later downforce of car kicks in and goodbye.
@xXwarstuserXx well,you can,if you can sneak out of the Grand Prix circuit on to the streets,and no one will catch you,specially police in Vauxhall Vectras...
@jasonsitu Yes, but then a bike will be more efficient on the street than a F1 car. High agility, small, light and not to mention, can go over bumps. :)
Everyone always bitches about quality... god damn... Most people in 2007 weren't carrying around HD cameras in their fucking pockets. If you don't like it, don't watch the video. Everyone just loves to have something to fucking bitch and moan about.
Dexi 2 weeks ago
the point of the video is the comparison . who cares if its in black in whote with no audio . you stills aw who was fasterand by how much . it shows most of you are just missing the point and dont ride bikes or follow f1 . andboth are cool . just diff. 2 wheels and 4 . this was just to see the diff in speed.
mushrume 1 month ago
Jenson Button ?? ^^
MrMercuryMinecraft 1 month ago
no way man, it was recorded with a Granny Smith apple
porridge90210 1 month ago
If it wasnt a completly soaked track the bike would have won,of course te f1 car would have better traction in the rain over a bike any day but if it was dry the other way around
ITALIANGTRR34 1 month ago
this is fuji speedway in japan
borisinin 2 months ago
i just want to know which pixel is the car
markynhuz 2 months ago 6
@markynhuz seek for more moving pixels-that's the F1. The smaller group of moving pixels is the motogp.
zorandesign 1 month ago
what's the car, and who is the driver?
and where is the toaster?
cuepenage 3 months ago
Track is Suzuka .JAPAN
myxaa9458 3 months ago
lol F1 car should be more faster, shit video or very shit driver
kanterretnak 3 months ago
@kanterretnak Not really shit driver the F1 cars takes the acceleration, offcourse because of lot more traction. But Gp bikes today has lot more topspeeds than f1 cars, In corners an F1 car will also overtake bikes AGAIN due to traction and downforce. But in a drag race the bike will loose a bit in beginning then overtake F1car after a while....There are tracs where GPBikes reach 350+ km/h while F1 cars never in any tracks go past 330 km/h. FACT......
ghost500e 2 months ago
@ghost500e Check out the f1 honda vs honda superbike vs honda power boat, the f1 car anihalated the bike once up to speed, left it for dust!
jaguarxjrs15 1 month ago
@jaguarxjrs15 Ive seen that video and they have a standing start... Numnuts thats what i said before. accelerationwise an f1 beats a bike anytime. What i said was and read carefully this time, a gpbike of today has greater topspeed, there are circuits where gpbikes reach speeds over 220 mph-350km/h where as a f1 car mostly only reach 205mph-325km/h DUE to so much downforce the rarely go past that. go figure huh...
ghost500e 1 month ago
@jaguarxjrs15 And again honda superbike aint even close to GP bikes.. and ofcourse if the rider cant ride the bike there u have it.... A proper superbike ON TRACK not a flying mile or so does as i said, 350 km/h Ive been fucking following the f1 series and gp series since the mid 80`s till today so i have a grewater clue than you do i think...
ghost500e 1 month ago
@jaguarxjrs15 a superbike is pretty slow compared to a MotoGP bike... So it´s not fair using an roadlegal bike vs and strict super-racing car-when they do A F1 vs a MotoGP bike the F1 will be destroyed topspeedwise.... as in acceleration i think it will be close but round a track F1 will win due to superior grip in corners, hope u grow up to recognize the difference in in topspeed acceleration and cornerhandling u noob..
ghost500e 2 days ago
@jaguarxjrs15 Comparing a superbike to a motoGP bike is like comparing a F1car to a formula ford car u dum motherfakker.
ghost500e 2 days ago
joke singapore "track"
havfun56 3 months ago
what model toaster did you use to record this?
FELiPES101 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what model toaster did you use to record this?
FELiPES101 4 months ago
what model toaster did you use to record this?
FELiPES101 4 months ago
Singapore? Haha. Since when do they have a "track" in Singapore.
JSCJL 4 months ago
Thing about it is , it wouldn't be fair. The bike would have the tendancy to wheelie , can't use full power while wheeliing for obvious reason. And the f1 car would have to hit high revs to use full power to keep from spinning out.
LurkerDanny 4 months ago
@jester34545 which is why he recorded it with a soda bottle with a fork in it
ZKillsTheRevived 4 months ago
the sound is too high pitch to be a gp bike
whatanerd1337 4 months ago
F1 is better but MotoGP is still good fun.
CdrJamesCool 4 months ago
lol i dindnt even see the bike :O
deutschessoftair 5 months ago
haha, who really gives a shit if the quality itsnt that great. why dont all of you people go outside for once! ur all like.. ehhh mah gawd there is like only 5 pixels in thiss!! who. cares! i race motorbikes, its damn good fun but the f1 cars have lots more tecnoligy in them.
Longboard414 5 months ago
@ollywetzig ahahahah me too XD
lusmanRally 5 months ago
fucking dickheads talking about how bad the video is.. DUDE only years ago all of our mobile / normale camcorders were crap... who cares
district37nl 6 months ago
...Filmed with a dookie...
sk84chickz 6 months ago
@sk84chickz gAY
VeryFunnyKid 5 months ago
@VeryFunnyKid
Suck on it... You know that was funny.
sk84chickz 5 months ago
lol that's not a motoGP bike, the sound is way to high pitched, nice try though
datnoticboi 7 months ago
@datnoticboi You heard the F1
petruz1993 7 months ago
@petruz1993 oops guess your right =p i thumbed up your comment haha
datnoticboi 7 months ago
@datnoticboi haha xDD np
petruz1993 6 months ago
This isnt a race, it is a rain tire test.
britishbikes12 7 months ago
Is there some rule that these drag races must occur in the rain?
britishbikes12 7 months ago
how won i cant see it
EAmaster123 7 months ago
lol don't know if anyone's pointed this out before but i think its on suzuka in japan
kinkyassholes 7 months ago
@kinkyassholes No it is not Suzuka
noskoff1 7 months ago
I suppose the key for the man in the street is that the MotoGP bike is completely relevant. The average Joe can buy 90% of the experience for 10 grand. An F1 car on the other hand - well it is barely a car to be honest. Not in any sense that your average car driver can grasp. Only millionaires with hypercars can get close.
Daz555Daz 7 months ago
the big difference with this video is the bike is a "bike" the car isnt even a "'car" more like a stupid go cart contraption
pdak005 7 months ago
stupid bikers thinking bikes are better than cars watch most of car vs bike things on youtube and most are victory to cars also do you really honestly think a shiti bike could beat a 0-60 in about 2 secs 220mph car idiots
chippyarcher 7 months ago
@chippyarcher You know why dumbass? Caus a car has 4 wheels to get the power on the track. A bike uses only one. Uhh what did you say again? Fuck off.....
aponcapone 7 months ago
@aponcapone Haha since when did f1 cars have 4 wheel drive?
Master1906 7 months ago
@Master1906 I didnt say a f1 does but lots of cars do. its not even worth to discus a bike vs car becaus its not comparable....A bike just has 1 wheel drive so its not comparable at all my friend....
aponcapone 7 months ago
@aponcapone You said a car has 4 wheels to put its power down so you were implying it was 4 wheel drive. And comparing cars to bikes is like comparing apples to oranges, its still interesting to watch.
Master1906 7 months ago
@Master1906 I agree with you, its intresting to watch but you can not compare a car and a bike....two different things but yes, very cool to watch it.....
aponcapone 7 months ago
the road was wet, how could u tell from the wooden camera this was taken with
Kosdaboss214 7 months ago
Um, the roadway is wet! Of course 4 wheels beat two!
MrMufn8r 8 months ago
@MrMufn8r a formula one car is faster than a bike anywhere!! stop crying
innocent64 7 months ago
@MrMufn8r MotoGP is gay
lsbgamer 5 months ago
@lsbgamer you're obv stupid, f1 is boring!!
Perky0101 5 months ago
@Perky0101 so a Monaco GP on a day with heavy rain is boring. ok
lsbgamer 5 months ago
Idk that's y I asked. If I had to guess I would say 84% toluene and 16% heptane.
tonlocsvids 8 months ago
What kind of fuel was the f1 car useing?
tonlocsvids 8 months ago
@tonlocsvids Your guess?
OveragedUser 8 months ago
thats fugi mate
AlexSaloyedoff 8 months ago
wet track :/
AdamNeisler 8 months ago
Four wheels = more traction.
thehistorywatcher 8 months ago
@thehistorywatcher shut your mouth whore!
villauptop 8 months ago
@thehistorywatcher
rear wheel drive not four wheel drive, but yea
BluntToy 8 months ago
FUCKING FUJI YOU STUPID UPLOADER
Tomasch 8 months ago
Japan you numb skulls !
erikinhawaii 8 months ago
ICHIE KNEE
OldMateAU 8 months ago
Its a Toyota F1 car :D
mhajsz 8 months ago
Not Singapore for sure. We do not have a race track.
clintonpuah 8 months ago
that looks like fuji, japan
Zvenmighster 8 months ago
some people actually dad a test and found that the only reason a gp bike couldn't beat a formula 1 car in a drag race was because they couldn't get the gp bike to have enough traction.
cquackaz 8 months ago
was this video taken with a fucking calculator?
jimmyohdez 8 months ago 157
@jimmyohdez AHahaha! best comment in the uourld! I'm going to steal that one!
Samisven 8 months ago
@jimmyohdez No, i think it was a potato :)
MrSubjectNo1 7 months ago
@jimmyohdez
No, they recorded it with a potato.
jshaw6600 6 months ago 35
@jshaw6600 Dude don't be stupid. Toaster oven.
Hankola 3 months ago
@jimmyohdez lmfao hahahahahahahaha too funny dude!
tedrocksu 6 months ago
@jimmyohdez hahaha lmfao!
bluemotion1905 4 months ago
F1 ROCK
Tribunales 9 months ago
F1 ROCK
Tribunales 9 months ago
what is the resoultion here?? was this video taken on a motorola razr??
AlternativeUses 9 months ago
Proving that on the top end of things bikes ARE not as fast as cars and NEVER will be. a F1 will destroy ANY bike in ANY type of race period.
jamesjdm 9 months ago 2
BUT this...and BUT that...pffft
MohammadKhanzeer 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
F1 cars brutal
Find ,title on google "2010 Malaysian Grand Prix" thats F1 results and fasest lap of f1 2010 GP on Sepang circuits wikipedia
Than title "2010 Malaysian motorcycle Grand Prix wikipedia"
Thats moto GP race results,Sepang circuits and fasest lap.
((F1 2010 Malaysian GP.Sepang circuit.Fasest lap, M.Webber 1:37.054 ))
((Moto GP 2010,Malaysian GP.Sepang circuit..Fasest lap,V Rossi- 2:02.117)
Formula is aaaa- 25 sec per lap faster than Moto GP racing bike.Light year
toniiii9 9 months ago
keep in mind this 1 pixel f1 car looks like it is one of the older turbo era cars which made just insane hp to the point they had to ban turbo's because the cars got too fast.
bakerking31 9 months ago
more pixels vs less pixels
generalhans1 9 months ago
It is in Fuji!
The F1 car is a Toyota and the track in Fuji is owned by Toyota. Does anybody spot something? it fits together! :D
rhoenrocker 9 months ago
Why do this kinda shit in the rain?
slb785 9 months ago
@slb785 So the car has a better chance, in the dry the bike would whip its ass. Notice the bike caught up in the latter part (when the car is supposed to have the advantage). Good vid
bobbj77 9 months ago
@bobbj77
no not at all. the angle of the camera made it look that way a little but all in all the bike should have had better traction in the rain since the F1 has very wide tries that cause it to hydro plain much easier than a bikes thinner tire would (this is simple physics). face it, bikes may be fast but they are not as fast as an F1 car.
jamesjdm 9 months ago
@bobbj77 NO. Not in wet or dry. Physics. Four tires have more grip and friction that two.
cliffcox66 9 months ago
@bobbj77 In the dry, the F1 car would gain more surface contact patch for the tyre than the bike would, so would have an even bigger advantage than in this vid. Also, the bike only caught the F1 after the F1 had crossed the finish line and lifted off, plus, the F1 car wouldn't have been set up with low downforce which would've helped the F1 be even quicker in a straight line than it already was. These tests have been done since the 90's in all kinds of conditions and F1 always wins. ;)
tobybushby 8 months ago
this is not in singapore
in Japan
taiyakiuser 9 months ago
i love the part where its in hd :)
Ashs3906 9 months ago
this is not singapore, it is in japan. they are counting down in japan.
khairino 10 months ago
looks like Fuji to me
danb1990 10 months ago
if i could have a penny for each pixal in this vid i would have one cent
indianaperry1 10 months ago
korea maybe?
bkblitzed 10 months ago
Looks like the track is Fuji Speedway in Japan
AznBoiiBTW 11 months ago 2
acceleration its something to compare... but brakes and turns... F1 ftw
d5j4vu 11 months ago
this is obviously not singapore.
KyleMAD 11 months ago
Wow it was closer then i expected it to be.
dfa10000 11 months ago
its not singapore.... its fuji international in japan.
antonyaiken 11 months ago
an amazing video, all one pixel of it
JKPele 11 months ago 246
@JKPele LOL!!!!
johnniewalker39 8 months ago
@JKPele looool
lusmanRally 5 months ago
Actually, it was a Xerox Ducati from WSBK
coolracer46 11 months ago
put wheelie bar on bike and that would help, but F1 does kick major ass though.
Dreadzedan 1 year ago
it´s the track in fuji
hoadinga 1 year ago
This is about what you'd expect.
The bike is let down because of it's tendency to wheelie at the start line.
Although, in general (in terms of road legal) bikes are quicker than cars because of their amazing acceleration.
Search for "Jenson Button Vs TheSuper Bike" it has a much better race
19JP87 1 year ago
the bike actually did pretty good
cquackaz 1 year ago
I've got to say but you'll notice that the track's wet. Unlikely that the bike was going to win with it like that. I'd like to see it replayed in the dry.
Nosteratees 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i love bikes, but i love F1 cars too. the honest truth is as follows;
regular cars < 250cc bikes < muscle cars < sport cars < 500cc/600cc/650cc bikes < super cars < 750cc/1000cc bikes < F1 cars.
**just a general order of STOCK vehicles; mods may change that, but generally thats how it goes; F1 cars are the kings of the road & 750cc/1000cc bikes are the very close runners-up.
szocspeti 1 year ago
WTF 3mil bike you mean 100k they cant cost 3mil?: D: D: D
kakkukaala 1 year ago
@kakkukaala Do some homework, 3 million u$ dollars is about right
GussetMonkey 1 year ago
power to weight they are pretty damn close.. but with MotoGP bikes, even tho they might have the traction on the rear on the take off, if they go full out, they will just wheel stand and throw the bike down the road.. also the car has a much larger contact patch with its rear tires aswell for the power to be transfered through
shimmikins 1 year ago
Yes the F1 car murdered it which was'nt supprising.
NANOFORGE 1 year ago
Waste of time,the track was WET !!!
sandstau 1 year ago
the tech in both the bikes and f1 cars nowadays are absolutely amazing.. i always thought that motorcycles take more skill to ride..but then again...it takes a pair of huge ones to go into a corner at 160+ mph lol
jamesnotnev 1 year ago
dats not in singapore..
elhamimpresario 1 year ago
Dumb comparison. 10k dollar bike, 1million dollar car. Hmm. What's wrong here. Should have beat the bike by a lot more than that. lol
rrhynes 1 year ago
@rrhynes more like 100k dollar bike ATLEAST and 10 million dollar car (possibly more)
TheLyingBitch 1 year ago
@TheLyingBitch lol dude they bikes cost more like 3-4mil each and the car 4-5mil never a 100k lol
CelticFan1988 1 year ago
@rrhynes
You mean 3 million dollar bike and 5 million dollar car.
Most of the people posting no nothing about either sport.
EJ25RUN 1 year ago
@EJ25RUN 3 million bike? LOL clueless retard
derecksandyoffical 1 year ago
@derecksandyoffical
I've followed GP since the Schwantz Rainey and Doohan days.
Before you spite me for something you choose not to believe because your all mighty f1 car has to be best, check what Honda did for the RC211V.
EJ25RUN 1 year ago
@EJ25RUN not 3 million.
derecksandyoffical 1 year ago
@derecksandyoffical Easy tiger, your mother was.
Look it up, to lease one would cost 3 million a year, and the actual cost of manufacture is about the same
GussetMonkey 1 year ago
correct
yvisa67 1 year ago
f1 respect, but you can newer compare a bike and a car. and anyway its 10 times more fun to be riding bikes =)
1984abcdef1984 1 year ago
Car is faster but F1 racing is soooo fucking boring compared to Moto GP....
schwantz037 1 year ago
@schwantz037 only comment that has spoke the truth! bikes so much more intresting.
sidd463 1 year ago
GearsOfWar2Online 1 year ago
I'm surprised that bike was keeping up, MotoGP bikes are fast as hell but nothing goes like an F1 car does.
In other words, the future of F1 looks like shit, smaller design teams, smaller engines (they're talking about V6's)...
sookster54 1 year ago
la salida es mas fuerte con 4 ruedas, jaja, aunque un vehículo con cuatro veces menos potencia da guerrita eh?
multivesa 1 year ago
a rocket agaist a f1 car would be a interesting comparison to *sarcasm*
Bertlhuaba 1 year ago
did anyone see the track was wet? i have a 06 r1 and on a wet road theres no way you can smash the throttle. you have about 7000 rpms out of 13700 to use. just my 2 cents
slothmizzy 1 year ago
@slothmizzy the track was NOT wet you little nerd. I guess you are blind right ? the F1 car did pull a smokey burnout right off the line which would not have happened on a wet track you "expert"
there is no excuse - bikes are slower, period.
3O2MuStAnG 1 year ago
@3O2MuStAnG
laptimes of f1 are better. MotoGP has the top speed. Point out.
GearsOfWar2Online 1 year ago
@GearsOfWar2Online F1 has the top speed, corner speed and lap time.
stig781 1 year ago
@stig781 Haha not. Compare the top speeds at Sepang. You will see. Hope you don't cry.
GearsOfWar2Online 1 year ago
@3O2MuStAnG bikes are deffinately slower on tracks but on roads, bikes will always beat cars
matman1813sdc 1 year ago
hello lesnar1234 sorry to bother you. i believe this track was not from singapore. the only track we humbly got for the F1 night race are normal road used on daily basis by our singaporean drivers around marina and city hall area which the the race organiser have planned which route or road to be closed for the F1 event usage. correct me if i'm wrong this track i believe came from japan..........do pls accept my humble apologies once again, your humble singaporean......................
DRIFTZSPORT 1 year ago
@lonelykatana The bike can never show its potential on a track against the F! because it has to brake 150 yards sooner and can't aply full power out of the corners. Well the 990 could only use full power for 10% of track or even less. I've allways wondered what the top speed of a moto gp bike could be if they geared it for a top speed test and had a few miles straight. Having 260 hp and low weight plus aerodynamics, I reckon it could reach maybe 250 mph possibly. Love to see that done.
benjyboba 1 year ago
the restrictions kind of defeat the purpose of f1. it is supposed to be the fastest, the best. its just to to know that technology progress is coming to a stop
an50331 1 year ago
LoL even F1 cars have trouble dealing with bikes. Sportbikes FTW
turbomoore 1 year ago
@fuckyeah0009 yeah, since FIA doesn't put restrictions on F1 cars to lower speeds. 'A' for effort, bud
akramer0005 1 year ago
Dirty nigger
Doo0ne 1 year ago
the car has a way bigger engine and better power to weight ratio than the bike by comparison
the car would probably be par with the bike on the track, and the bike would certainly win in the canyons. a drag race however is centered around HP and the biggest engine wins
SoldierCyfix 1 year ago
@SoldierCyfix
the canyons? the car would smoke the bike on track.
mjdillaha 1 year ago
@mjdillaha probably
SoldierCyfix 1 year ago
its like in japan
necromorphs 1 year ago
doesn't count in the rain.
nictycaram 1 year ago
im sure if you took all of the weight and other restrictions off of moto gp bikes then the bikes would outrun the f1 cars. but since they do have restrictions gp bikes havent even tapped their full potential
fuckyeah009 1 year ago
@fuckyeah009 LOL F1 cars have been mercilessly restricted over the years, especially after the '80s turbo craziness. Current F1 cars are down about 200-250 HP and 2000 rpm down from 5 years ago. If unrestricted, you couldn't even mention anything that is currently road circuit worthy against an F1 car....
400SA 1 year ago
@400SA
Moto GP bikes are reduced to 800 CC. They use to be 950. That's nearly 20% down.
Then the power is only 220 BHP VS the F1's 950 BHP.
The cost of the F1 car is a hell of a lot more to design. Better technology aswell.
UnseenSpirit 1 year ago
@UnseenSpirit
F1 cars are only 750-850 HP these days thanks to an evil little troll named Bernie, down from near 1000 HP in the V10 era. But Bernie can't live forever...
400SA 1 year ago
@400SA I see, I wonder why they all started downsizing? I doubt it is in the cost because they spend a hell of a lot in develepment on the new engines and try to make as much power as possible.
F1 cars are better and faster, no doubt about it. But a Moto GP bike is frightenly good aswell.
To do 200 MPH must be crazy in a car and Bike. The car creates a lot og G force and on a bike, it really tests your balls when you have wind blowing in the air and the bike shakes and skids.
UnseenSpirit 1 year ago
@UnseenSpirit well F1 cars have been reduced from 1400 BHP per ton to the 950 per ton so thats also a great reduce of power
armsman919 1 year ago
@400SA Don't get me wrong, I also watch F1, but I haven't followed the details, same with Moto GP.
Basically Moto GP bikes could have been so much faster with the rise in technolgy in recent years and the fact that the reduction in engine size affected the whole bike completely. Weight and the balance of a bike is very important. The power has slowly gone back up to how it was with the bigger engines, but it could have been even more.
UnseenSpirit 1 year ago
too bad the car probably didn't have traction until the finish line...
18kRPM 1 year ago
people that say that the F1 own thats because it has 4 tires, and the more tires means the more ground surface the vehicle has to grip the ground. The motorcycle has 2 tires, and its still catching up to the car! People that are saying that F1 is better dont drive F1's they are too scared to ride motorcycles
954haha 1 year ago
f1 owns bikes in every single respect no comparison
amiger421 1 year ago 27
@amiger421 So-So true, but most bikers can't seem to accept this " FACT"
LEBONSKIFINARM 1 year ago
@amiger421 dude u cant compare those two as u can seee the legend norick abe couldnt beat it noone can :) its dum to compare formula 1 and gp bike
CograCA 1 year ago
@amiger421 dude it´s incomparable but... you cant drive a f1 on the street :)
xXwarstuserXx 1 year ago 36
@xXwarstuserXx and you cant ride a motogp bike on the street either!
pbpwn 1 year ago
@pbpwn umm, yea you can, put some road legal tyres on, number plate, daylight mot and your away
matman1813sdc 1 year ago
@matman1813sdc wrong- besides from all that you need a headlight, brakelight, turn signals, one hell of a muffler, and probably more depending on your local laws. my point being it would take just as much work to turn a motogp bike street legal as it would an f1 car. cheers.
pbpwn 1 year ago
@pbpwn wrong- here in the uk you dont need a headlight brakelight or turn signals on a daylight mot but you do need a reflector, and yea a muffler like you said
matman1813sdc 1 year ago
@matman1813sdc ahh we are talking about two different places. <3 uk
pbpwn 1 year ago
@pbpwn lol we dont seem to be very strict on things like that here. i mean, you can drive tanks on the road :D
matman1813sdc 1 year ago
@xXwarstuserXx Sure you can lol. Put headlamps tail lights and turn signals then it's legal they can't stop you :D
getalife04 1 year ago
@xXwarstuserXx not? I saw one yesterday...
Espere312 1 year ago
@xXwarstuserXx yes you can Monaco and Singapore.
McFcHD 1 year ago
@xXwarstuserXx Its a wet track, you have obviously never ridden a motorcycle in the wet.
leieva 1 year ago
@leieva The bike will never beat.The car has those wings for downforce and at speed can put more power to the tire.GP bikes have incredible power to weight, i think almost 2hp/kg but what good.It might get a better start but later downforce of car kicks in and goodbye.
Olengher 1 year ago
@xXwarstuserXx well,you can,if you can sneak out of the Grand Prix circuit on to the streets,and no one will catch you,specially police in Vauxhall Vectras...
Volodeas 11 months ago
@xXwarstuserXx just for the record, you cant ride a motogp bike out on the street
jasonsitu 11 months ago
@jasonsitu Yes, but then a bike will be more efficient on the street than a F1 car. High agility, small, light and not to mention, can go over bumps. :)
92397658 11 months ago