Added: 7 months ago
From: Rob260259
Views: 711
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (61)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Conspiracy theories are cooked up to make money for someone. Scratch a conspiracy theory and there is a fraud underneath.

  • Well many people disagree. I encourage you to lose the word "fact" from your argument. None of us know the "facts." Without a physical reproduction, all of what we've heard is "theory". And our opinions shouldn't bother you so much. Our intentions are to increase speculation of a government and its secret entities who have clearly been irresponsible with their power. You are here because you feel a personal duty to challenge those who don't think like you, and this is weak thinking.

  • @cmadodge

    Fact is that the highly directional telemetry signals came from the Moon and were picked up by several receiving stations.

    Fact is that the Soviet DSN monitored these signals at Simferopol. They even acknowledged them.

    Fact is that the scientific experiments (60) left on the Moon were transmitting data to Earth. No unmanned probe could have simulated that.

    Fact is that the missions were tracked for redundancy purposes, by multiple sites.

    Fact is that there are many more facts.

  • @Rob260259 Rob, my bad. I think we are talking about two different things... I'm not interested in the moon landing. I mean, whether or not we won the race doesn't influence my opinion of our current condition. More important things are happening... like ohhhhh the elimination of the middle-class for starters. My interests are in current events. Current evidence and testimony that contradict the official story on multiple issues. Not the moon landing...

  • @cmadodge

    Ah, my bad as well.

    "The central belief of every moron is that he is the victim of a mysterious conspiracy against his common rights and true deserts. He ascribes all his failure to get on in the world, all of his congenital incapacity and damfoolishness, to the machinations of werewolves assembled in Wall Street, or some other such den of infamy."

    - Henry L. Mencken, American journalist

  • @Rob260259 ^^"American Journalist".... you mean a reporter? He said that?! Brilliant. Now I know what I'm dealing with. No matter what immature string of words you plan on throwing at me, I'm done responding. You are simply rude, like the rest of you self-righteous types.

  • @cmadodge

    It's not about the journalist, it's about his words. Which you don't (want to) understand, of course. No, he didn't said that, he wrote it. LOL

    "I'm done responding".

    - Your best comment the past few days! Good luck with your conspiracy theories and delusional paranoia.

  • Comment removed

  • You forgot about the "conspiracy theory" that HIV does not cause AIDS. Watch "House of Numbers" and hear the inventor of HIV tell you that a healthy immune system will prevent you from getting infected when exposed to HIV. All hail the scientific method!

  • @NASAsPETE

    "more information please"

    - I sure hope you don't hold your breath Pete.

    I studied all sides of the hoax arguments and found all hoax conspiracies to be sadly lacking in any real substance.

  • @NASAsPETE Exactly! Whoever believes 19 Muslims were able to secretly prepare the twin towers and the CIA HQ in NYC with incendiaries or explosives must be a lunatic and should be appointed a legal guardian!

  • @RummelsdorfLabs

    Whoever believes that a federal administration can cover up a conspiracy with thousands involved, like that is a delusional hoax headed twoofer. At best.

  • @RummelsdorfLabs

    The JFK assassination: watch?v=DSBXW1-VGmM&feature=ch­annel_video_title

    Watch and learn.

  • @Rob260259 I cannot believe how easily a seemingly educated man like you will fall for this slick propaganda. The video didn't even address the head shot!!! Jackie grabbed Johns brain from the BACK of the car! But it was completely omitted.

  • @RummelsdorfLabs

    Have you ever seen dead bodies after a shooting? Have you ever seen what a human head looks like after a hit by a bullet? Have you ever photographed the details at a crime scene? Have you ever been present at an autopsy?

    I have.

  • @Rob260259 Have you ever studied physics?

    I have.

  • @RummelsdorfLabs

    "Have you ever studied physics?"

    How about answering my questions about orbital mechanics? Imagine a vehicle is launched with an inclined trajectory (I hope you know what that means). Can you try to explain how to calculate this vehicle's distance from Earth in the equatorial plane?

  • @Rob260259 You willingly surrender your own credibility when you suggest that the ideas of those who don't think like you are "...based on the premise that every scientist and engineer in the world is either stupid or lying."

    What a strange thing to say when trying to squash conspiracy theories.

    Are you suggesting that those who don't think like you personally visited and interviewed every scientist and engineer in the world?

    You sound terribly misinformed...

    ...and terribly opinionated.

  • @RummelsdorfLabs

    "a seemingly educated man like you will fall for this slick propaganda"

    - Thank you. I'm not the only person however. Thousands of specialists in aeronautics, aerospace, dynamics, radiology, astronomy, geology, mechanics, engineering, communications, physics, chemistry, electronics and astrophysics acknowledged the facts of the Moon landings.

    Only some self absorbed fools calling themselves 'truthers' think they are smarter than these people.

  • @Rob260259 I was clearly talking about the JFK assassination conspiracy.

    About the peer-pressure argument: I am not impressed by that. When Galilei realized that there were no crystal spheres, he had the WHOLE establishment against him. So 99% of experts CAN actually be in error. It should remind us to always question established dogmas.

    So is there any real hard evidence of the moonwalk, that could not have been forged or done by unmanned crafts?

  • @RummelsdorfLabs

    Well, I was clearly talking about conspiracies in general. They are utter nonsense. Are you seriously comparing the time of Galilei with todays world? Todays digital exchanging knowledge world? You are too funny. Today there is absolute NO way that 99% of all the experts and credentialed people in the world can be in error. You, as a conspiracist, would like to believe that. But it's only YOUR 'truth'.

    Yes, there really is hard evidence of the moonwalk. But not for hoaxheads.

  • @RummelsdorfLabs

    You know, that 'truth' movement is a laugh. The internet has not changed history. It has just given idiots a bigger soapbox to stand on. I have to laugh at YT users who think of themselves as some sort of "truth patriots" yet they lack the knowledge to understand the science behind the Apollo program. Real patriots are the astronauts. People who would slander them are just ass clowns.

  • @RummelsdorfLabs

    The internet. LOL. It kind of sucks to say, but I blame the internet for conspiracy bullshit. It used to be that you had to publish something, so you had to convince a company that your information was right so they would print it. Now, any asshole with a cable modem can put his non-peer reviewed, ridiculously illogical bullshit on the internet, and thousands of other assholes can collectively circle-jerk over it.

  • @Rob260259 "conspiracy bullshit", "asshole", "ridiculously illogical bullshit", "other assholes can collectively circle-jerk over it", " 'truth' movement is a laugh", "idiots", "ass clowns", "utter nonsense", " hoaxheads", "self absorbed fools"

    ... Quotes by you, that all describe you. Try learning some respect and then perhaps your ego will give your brain a chance to operate with less distractions....

  • @cmadodge

    I have ZERO respect for people saying "fake" because they don't understand the science & engineering behind things.

    Are you one of those 'twoofers' or conspiracy nuts?

  • @Rob260259 You'll be amazed how much you can learn when your mind isn't blocked by your ego.

    Like I said...

    Terribly misinformed...

    Terribly opinionated.

  • @cmadodge

    Yes, sometimes I am amazed by these socalled 'truthers' and conspiracy theorists. I think it is not the need for truth that drives these people, it is colossal ignorance, lazyness, arrogance and conceit.

    But that is my opinion of course... LOL

    "Terribly misinformed"

    - That is your opinion.

    "Terribly opinionated"

    -That is your information.

    In the mean time; try providing one (1) ounce of proof that the Moon landings were faked.

  • @Rob260259 Would you mind telling us why you're here? I'm watching our country be destroyed. I'm angry about that. I see us being screwed from every angle. Or food and water poisoned, TSA injecting themselves into our children's lives (ads on school busses), strange weather and weird bugs everywhere... We believe that the people should question things... but why are you here? Are you here just to prove me wrong? I'm here to help wake people up. Why are you here?

  • @cmadodge

    I long ago gave up hope of ever persuading a conspiracy nutcase to change his position, so why am I still here and debate them? Well, a big reason is to ensure that any silent bystanders know that there's another side to the story. Hoax believers' claims can be so patently absurd and counter to demonstrable facts and logic that I often find it impossible to accept that they really do believe what they're saying. Moon landing hoax, 9/11byBush, Chemtrails, NWO, Freemasons, etc. etc.

  • @Rob260259 Ok... you understand that we aren't causing any harm right?

    We are constitutionalists.

    What you are doing seems to be self-satisfying, not useful to the greater good... (we annoy you, and you can't let this nonsense happen.) Is that it?

    But what we are doing is for the future of our country.

    Demanding proof indicates your desire to remain stable in your position.

    Did you demand the same proof for the story that you believe in? Because their "proof" is all theory.

    That's all

  • @cmadodge

    "Because their "proof" is all theory".

    - Nope. The story has been proven by physical facts.

    That's all.

  • @cmadodge

    "Would you mind telling us why you're here?"

    - I visited your channel. It's very obvious why you are here.

  • @RummelsdorfLabs

    "that could not have been forged or done by unmanned crafts?"

    - Have you really got any (physical) clue what it means to launch an unmanned craft into lunar orbit?

    - Consider all the astronauts that went there, the scientific experiments left on the Moon and the data received from them, the 840 pounds of rocks and 6 foot long intact core tube samples brought back, Lunar reflectors left, the satellites launched from the SIM bays etc. etc.

    Try that with an unmanned craft... LOL

  • @RummelsdorfLabs Galileo presented EVIDENCE to support his claims, the establishment was guided by religious belief and threats of being a heritic with dire consequences if you opposed this belief ( earth centred solar system, ect) Galileo was arrested by the church and exiled by the then pope, he was later forced to retract his claims, it took the church some 400 years to admit he was right, give us hard evidence of a fake moon landing! I have yet to see a single plausible claim of any fakery.

  • Can't you see in your video that JFK is shot at from the front? Good example for a government cover-up. And yes Lady Di was not only murdered but also illegally embalmed!!! The free fall of the three WTC skyscrapers also gives it away.

    If someone makes the extraordinary claim that he went to the moon, i need some extraordinary evidence in order to accept it as truth, not material produced in a studio. The moon rocks also turned out to be fake.

  • @RummelsdorfLabs

    No, I really can not see that.

    Moon rocks fake? Tell me some examples. Mention some credential sources please.

  • @Rob260259 Just enter "moonrocks fake" into google and you will find the Telegraph, BBC etc.

    Did you watch?v=yo5w0pm24ic and watch?v=MalYSn_qIU4

    Some claims are easily debunkable, but many are not. Maybe you can debunk them all?

  • @RummelsdorfLabs

    "moonrocks"

    - There has been only one (1). And it was not coming from NASA. It was coming from a the family of a former Dutch PM who donated it to a museum. It was very obvious that it was not genuine.

    watch?v=mHALUGcEEiQ&feature=ch­annel_video_title

    - Yes, all the claims on that hoax footage are debunkable. And have been debunked a thousand times by REAL scientists, astronomers and people who are credentialed and DO know what they talk about.

  • @NASAsPETE

    My next video will be done in a week or two ;)

  • Elvis @0:29 as a faith based religion? It actually makes sense to me.

    This comp brings to mind the movie "Sneakers" with Robert Redford. I don't remember any of the music from that movie, but this belongs somewhere in the sound track.

  • @philwebb59

    Yep. Elvis Lives is one of those stories. I remember a Dutch guy (tought it was 78) having a whole pile of 'evidence' that Elvis was alive and kicking.

    Sneakers..? Don't know the movie, but I'm going to check it out. And please Phil, stop making these compliments. It was really nothing. The synthesizer and the sequencers do the work. I'm just pushing the buttons.

    As a matter of fact; I'm going to make a music video, with this score.

  • @philwebb59

    Hey Phil, just found out about Sneakers. Watch the trailer (the beginning of it):

    w w w . imdb . com/video/screenplay/vi9317255­93/

    This is something for Awe130!

  • Conspiracy theories are a faith-based religion for the paranoid delusionals who want to think they're a real-life Moulder or Scully and have cleverly discovered some amazing top secret plot that will change the world!

  • @astrophonix

    Yep. That's a real solid definition.

  • I love the 9/11 theory that points to inside job. ...because....nobody would notice an entire team ripping away at the walls to get rig the building for demolition

  • @destin325 And of course having the foresight to place them exactly where the planes hit (different positions on the two towers) and naturally not igniting explosives, dislodging detonators, wires etc when the planes smashed through the towers at however hundreds of miles an hour. Also they completely ignore the fact it doesn't look at all like controlled demolition in the first place.

  • @ModerateMartian

    And ignoring the fact that putting together a controlled detonation on a building that size would not fo unnoticed by the people using the builidng.

  • @lukequixotesanjose Absolutely.

  • Conspiracy theorists can't "get real" since virtually all of them are delusional. Getting real would require lots of psychiatric treatment as a first step.

  • @GoneToPlaid From what I've seen most conspiracy theorists are delusional, which comes way before any sort of reasoning.

  • Bullshit...!!!!

  • @lukequixotesanjose

    Any chance of being more substantive? Bulldog displays of primitive emotion will only make you look exactly like Rob says you are.

  • @SpreadingtheMuse

    Sorry. I don't understand. I'm just repeating the line in Rob's video since it made me laugh.

  • @lukequixotesanjose

    K. With all the people around here its real hard to remember who is on who's side ;)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more