hey, uberti, pietta, how bout using better steel and improve quality control before you ship them. your prices are very high so should be your manufactor/quality control. if you do this i will improve my spelling in the future. is it a deal?
@hedgehoghunter007 They Have, in Publication Magizines. There are two levels of quality when it comes to remington reproductions. One is the Uberti Revolvers, which are the low end. The other however is made by Hartford Armory(If they still make it) and is a much better, but more expensive firearm. The Hartford though is an exxact copy, but much stronger than the original due to modern materials and can even handle magnum loads (44 mag or Heavy 45).
@CornFedArmen Yeah, all old American revolvers were SA...Americans have always been marksmen, while Europeans had empires to fight for. Distances were longer in the West, but a British officer fighting off colonial rebels needed rate-of-fire more than accuracy. That's the "official story", anyway. When the US was in the Phillipines, they found that their .36cals weren't cutting it, and a .45 Colt SAA was too slow...thus began the M1911, a .45 that was both SA AND fast-firing.
@justforever96 And when the US went to the 9mm in 1985, it was mostly for political reasons. Special ops have gone back to the tried and true 45 ACP for the same reason it was adopted in the first place, stopping power.
@snakemanmike Reminds me of how the British and Europeans were experimenting with small-bore military calibers like .280's (and smaller), with decent results, but the US insisted on a full power round as the standard NATO round. So they dropped all their .280 work and armed in 7.62x58mm to make the US happy...and then within a decade we came up with this "brilliant new idea" to go to 5.56mm instead. Funny, now we've gone the full circle back to 6.8mm, etc. Myself, I'd stick with the .30cal.
what si the lanyard ring used for
hellomynameisnipple 1 week ago
hey, uberti, pietta, how bout using better steel and improve quality control before you ship them. your prices are very high so should be your manufactor/quality control. if you do this i will improve my spelling in the future. is it a deal?
glynamus 1 month ago
very nice history of revolver guns, thanks for uploading.
beramz83 4 months ago
reminds me of the broken butterfly of res 4
thedarkpigeon1 8 months ago 2
@thedarkpigeon1
yeah but that was the S&W schofield model 3
dragonlancer1909 5 months ago
@StratConstatine It's just you.
snakemanmike 8 months ago
I would definitely take a pair of the 1875 remingtons.
TheJohnWilson2 8 months ago
I would like to see the butt ring put to use.
ntrudr800 11 months ago
wish somebody would do a review on one
hedgehoghunter007 1 year ago
@hedgehoghunter007 They Have, in Publication Magizines. There are two levels of quality when it comes to remington reproductions. One is the Uberti Revolvers, which are the low end. The other however is made by Hartford Armory(If they still make it) and is a much better, but more expensive firearm. The Hartford though is an exxact copy, but much stronger than the original due to modern materials and can even handle magnum loads (44 mag or Heavy 45).
TheFoundersWereRight 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my channel?
709slash 1 year ago
is this single action?
CornFedArmen 1 year ago
@CornFedArmen Yeah, all old American revolvers were SA...Americans have always been marksmen, while Europeans had empires to fight for. Distances were longer in the West, but a British officer fighting off colonial rebels needed rate-of-fire more than accuracy. That's the "official story", anyway. When the US was in the Phillipines, they found that their .36cals weren't cutting it, and a .45 Colt SAA was too slow...thus began the M1911, a .45 that was both SA AND fast-firing.
justforever96 1 year ago 6
@justforever96 And when the US went to the 9mm in 1985, it was mostly for political reasons. Special ops have gone back to the tried and true 45 ACP for the same reason it was adopted in the first place, stopping power.
snakemanmike 8 months ago
@snakemanmike Reminds me of how the British and Europeans were experimenting with small-bore military calibers like .280's (and smaller), with decent results, but the US insisted on a full power round as the standard NATO round. So they dropped all their .280 work and armed in 7.62x58mm to make the US happy...and then within a decade we came up with this "brilliant new idea" to go to 5.56mm instead. Funny, now we've gone the full circle back to 6.8mm, etc. Myself, I'd stick with the .30cal.
justforever96 8 months ago
The 1875 is the gun that I am about to buy !
CherokeeCharli 1 year ago
Beautiful. Love the 1875!
evel74 2 years ago