The guy with all the damn cows purchases the president, and then the presidential NDAA makes it so you get beat down & can't even complain that you have no cows & no way to get one, except to sell yourself into debt (slavery) … To Hopefully… one day save up & get taxed on the skinny assed cow you got burned on, Yo!
@mredstriumph Communism is a type of economy, not government. Therefore, saying communism forces people to do stuff under threat of violence is extremely incorrect. Communism has no position on how to enforce laws or what is the law.
Please watch my story"TIFFANY LEBOUEF SEEKS JUSTICE". I have documents to prove my innocence yet no one wants to even acknowledge it. My life has been destroyed.
Look up PRISON STOCKS....very lucrative....WHO ARE THE INVESTORS???
@mredstriumph btw, in capitalism there is no/little difference between private property and personal property, in socialism and communism there is. Personal property is like socialism's/communism's capotalist private property. In socialims and communism, private property is differen from the capitolist private property.If you go even just on Wikipedia for example, you'll find an article called "Private property", read it.
Under Capitalism or Communism, the prob of who gets the penthouse or beachfront property STILL needs to be solved. Physical limitations exist meaning everyone CANNOT have the best of everything
Under Capitalism, it's equitable in that IF you can earn or otherwise acquire the $, AND if you're willing to spend it (want it bad enough), then you can have it. Under Communism, these decisions are arbitrary. They are made by the party - w is led by greedy immoral pigs
Under Communism, the decisions are made BY FORCE, CONFINEMENT, OR THREAT OF VIOLENCE. It's mechanics are punitive. It's enforcement is human
& fickle. The decision of the majority or commisar is NEVER suggestive. It is a lawful order & those to who it pertains get no rights or appeal.
Capitalism, in contrast runs via incentive. Disputes r arbitrated via a established set of laws and rules, which are governed by due process, standing,& framework of personal rights
@mredstriumph Communism =/= Corrupt Totaltarian Dictatorship. Communism has no position on how law should be enforced. Neither does capitalism. You seem to believe in anti-communist propaganda that states communism = corruption and no rights and freedoms and no law, while capitalism = rights, freedom, and law, THAT IS NOT TRUE.
@mredstriumph (cont.) Laws, rights, freedoms, etc depend on what type of government you have. (Communism, generally, is not a type of governent. That's why I would consider a communist republic, having the aspects of both communism and a republic, the best type of government, rather than a (false) communist corrupt totaltarian dictatorship).
@mredstriumph I admit not everything can be 100% perfectly equal. If two people want a property, the one who pays more will get that house, and the one who didn't get it still has the same wealth as the person who brought it, one having the wealth in the house, the other in cash. It's still equal.
@mredstriumph (cont.) Those leaders who you describes as greedy immoral pigs (don't insult pigs like that) are just that. But, they (Stalin, Mao, etc.) are not real communists because they do not follow any true communist ideas. The PRC, North Korea, etc. are not communist countries. They only are on paper, which was so the leaders could get support and then become greedy. YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT, AS I SEE YOU DO NOT.
"The theory of the Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property." - Karl Marx
Christ clearly believed in capitalism, & often used the concept of private property in his parables. Socialist & Marxists in America (Barrack is great for this) love to quote the "Brother's keeper" "parable".
They're unbelievers & too Biblically illiterate 2 realize the quote is an act of hubris by Cain before God after his ENVY drove him to murder.
@mredstriumph People who put more effort into something will get more out of it. A doctor usually needs more effort to be a doctor. This is what Marx even said too. No, I don't think Christ was a communist because there is nothing about his political views in the Bible and I am not Christian. Also, There is a big difference between private property and personal property, that difference you can google yourself.
@mredstriumph And those who do more expensive work or work that requires more skill obviously get paid more than a person who has a non/little skill needed job. And the comment you posted on my channel is involved with another style of communism than the one(s) I support.
No, that's not obvious that different jobs would pay differently under communism. That kind of thinking promotes a society with classes. It creates inequality.
Aren't those the very "problems" communism is supposed to eliminate?
@mredstriumph Idk what interpretation of communism you think I support, but pure communism and primitive communism (kinda like Christian communism) is what I support. The only thing that those two ideas state are that people work equally and share with the community, but can still own stuff if they like
Christ was a communist?? No. Absolutely outrageous."Christian Communism" is an anathema to God. Jim Jones' "people's temple" tried "Christian Communism" but had 0 to do w either Scripture or Christ.
Idk what interpretation of communism u think "pure communism" is.. but it's clearly not what communism's inventor says it is..
Karl Marx. "The theory of the Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property." = I've no idea w u believe
@mredstriumph Pure communism doesn't mean that everything is equal. In a pure communist society, everyone would be required to work equally, and share within the community easily. If you didn't do that, you just cannot live within that society any longer. Btw, I cant understand 1 1/2 of your two posts.
No. Pure communism doesn't mean that everything is equal because the reality is one house, car, or plot of land isn't identical to another. Often one is FAR better, & another is FAR worse.
If 300,000 ppl want to live in the penthouse of the most expensive building in NYC - clearly they ALL cannot. Under capitalism, the person w the most $ spends that $ to buy the best. Maybe u think that's not fair, but what is? Its not like that decision doesn't get made.
Under capitalism, it's egalitarian. The best goes to anyone who can pay the price for what's in demand. If u invent silly bands or velcro, or invest in the right stock, or start the right company or career, any can move up.
Under communism, one person still gets the penthouse, but the decision isn't based on $, it's based on politics. Some no qualification shmuck picks, & if he doesn't pick u, eat dirt, There is absolutely no mechanism to become successful.
Under communism there are ONLY 2 classes. Those who make decisions, & those for whom it is decided. Look up a word.. Dekulakization. That's what communism is about.
Ok, u want to "work equally"? I will "work equally" hard making decisions FOR YOU & deciding what is fair. You will "work equally" for me 6 miles down in the bottom of a mine.
My needs & tastes are more refined than yours, naturally I have the best. U have only the needs of an animal. Enjoy your pen.
Well it's a decent video, but where is the Republic?? You know.. where government is forced by a Constitution not to take your cows and prevented from harming you provided you don't harm or steal from anyone else?
Where the govt functions ONLY as a soldier protecting you from invaders, a policeman defending you from theft, an impartial judge protecting u from fraud & peacefully handling disputes based on due process & equal protection.
And where - IF - u want to be a communist, u go off and start a VOLUNTARY collective & leave everyone who DOESN'T want to be a communist the hell alone.
In TRUE communism, all 310 million Americans have an equal right to Oceanfront property. When there's not enough, Govt decides who gets to live there & who lives under a bridge based on party favors. If u want to be a doctor instead of raising cows - tough shit. Questions = fines, jails, prisons, & eventual execution
If you're talking about Anarchism in the traditional Libertarian-Socialist sense, it doesn't mean "no rules" or chaos. It means trade unions and the local community decides what the best method of distribution would be. An Anarchist society couldn't have money as its depicted here without some form State power to guarantee the value of the currency and legitimacy of the transaction.
I don't understand people's shouts for "real democracy" nowadays.
Democracy means the rule of a majority over a minority. Therefore it does not protect an individual's rights. Whereas in a republic you have a constitution which is guaranteeing your rights.
People should rather check the definition of "democracy" and "republic", so they know in which state they really want to live. We just need honest politicians, that's all. Even if they are hard to find.
Honest, dishonest..if his hands are tied by Enumerated Powers, Checks & Balances, Competing Branches of government, Due Process, a military sworn to defend the Constitution & an armed public with the ability to call him on his bullshit to say No! - who cares if the man tells stories
He'll be bounced out of office so hard his head w spin
I remember once hearing about a country with rules like that.. now all I keep hearing about is the 99% & some lipsink-er formerly known as 0
This video got a lot right, but in anarchism everything is shared communally. If the neighbor tries to steal your cows, you call the militia to deal with him or you kick his ass. That is pure anarchy!
No. Because somewhere people are suffering every bit as badly in North Korea slave labor prison camp at this very moment.
I get that the illustration is clever, but somehow 4 million slaughtered Cambodians (out of an initial population of 7.1 million 1975) isn't that good of a joke. Hitler killed 6 million Jews 67 years ago. I don't think anyone would be laughing if I started telling jokes about that now.
Nothing personal, but if we don't start understanding, we'll see it ourselvs
Yes pure communism is gr8 and all, but can we do that? I mean pure communism is discarding all the negative factors i.e cows dying, people getting lazy and not do their jobs.
Pure communism relies on the idiotic premise that all houses are equal - from Oprah's to Antoine Dodson's, + location means nothing in real estate. Fresh prime cut steak is equal to ramen noodles & my 1200 horsepower dodge viper is equal to your 30yr old Yugo.
Hey.. u got a car, I got a car righht??
I've got a gun 'cause I'm the "will of the people". You don't cause.. well.. you're not. You're the 1%
The "will of the ppl" CAN'T give u incentive just cause u work harder, Prison? Sure
U like it? What about the idiotic premise it relies on?
That all houses are equal - from Oprah's to Antoine Dodson's, That fresh prime cut steak is equal to ramen noodles & that a 1200 horsepower dodge viper is equal to a 30yr old Yugo.
Someone gets a gun & claims I'm the "will of the people". & U? U don't get one.You're the 1%
The "will of the ppl" CAN'T give u incentive just bc u work harder - that's unfair, Prison for questioning the collective or NOT working@100%? Sure.
And who are u to stand up to the 99% anyway? FU - If want your kidney. The 99% voted. U lost. Besides, u gave your right to it when u gave up control. Share share alike I always say
Now get in the cattle car & we'll see who has the numbers today - white or brown. White won yesterday, so they'll count the vote before deciding who has needs, & who has ability.
Just be glad you're not "the rich, the rich, the rich" (Jew Jew Jew) we are the 99
What makes even less sense than that is entrusting your government with the right to print your currency - and then having THEM give that right to a secretive, private, international bank that even your congressman can't audit
I guess if that secret private bank can lend them $ to expand the government till it's debts are the size of the entire private economy.. then that might be ok. But only if it lets them bail out Wall Street by devaluing my purchasing power.
Republic means if they're not your cows - leave 'em the F alone or I'll call the cops.
You want to be a hippy & live in a commune? No skin off my back. You want to occupy MY property & MY cows to start it - I have every right to use as much force as I need to STOP your force.
That's why you scumbags know your revolutions will always be bloody. The fact that in your heart u are a THIEF is why you never agree 2be a "communist" on your own. Commie=Slavemasters & pieces of shit.
Or Leninism. Or Bolshevism. Or barbarianism - murdering people for being middle class (The De-kulakization) and slaughtering 12 million unarmed Christians & Jews in the genocides of Latvia & Ukraine - aka - the Holomodor 15 years before Hitler even dreamed of his "final solution"
(which u never hear about since Stalin didn't lose the war)
This is an incredibly dogmatic video. This doesn't explain shit, the fact is I shouldn't have clicked on this video, because I know better then to think that all these COMPLEX forms of Government could be explained in 4 minutes.
pure socialism is not great,look at the israeli example,the kibbutzim,people lived in worse conditions than in capitalist countries,they couldn't buy cars or anything because they were so poor,now they changed the system and they are living much better,don't propagate a lie,in theory everything is wonderful,in practice it's not the same thing.
Wasn't bad, except for two points: under pure communism, no, you don't have any cows. the collective has cows. And under Anarchy, it doesn't matter whether the price for your cows and the milk is fair or not, all that matters is who has the most firepower. If you have the most, you can demand whatever price you want. If others do, your cows, milk, and labor are suddenly free...
According to this, a benevolent dictatorship would be: You have two cows. The government asks you if you need the cows, and if not asks you if they can have them. Then, they ask if you want to join the military.
and you left out unregulated capitalism - you have 2 cows you hire an impovershed child for slave wages to take care of them and then you sell the milk at an increased profit any milk that doesnt sell you pour down the drain - then you goto your local representative and donate to his reelection if hell pass a law preserving child labor - because its cheaper than school taxes
resource based economy you have 2 cows and you donate them to the local dairy which roboticaly cares for them and roboticaly distrutes the milk to various outlets via the milk mangement system and you put in an online request for milk and its sent to you via robotical controled delivery vehicles in recycalble containers and you put any old containers in the vehicle to be cleaned and reused - have to admit this is best!!
animal rights activist dictatorship - you have 2 cows and milk them then you are convicted of theft cownapping and cow slave trade and jailed - the cows are spray painted to prevent use of thier leather and set free - where a truck driver hits them and is convicted of and jailed for involuntary cow slaughter and the cows bodies are properly buried so as to prevent cannibalism - because cows are people too
Libertarian/anarchocaptalism, would be: You have 2 cows you want to sell 1 cow but the other guy don't want to sell you the cow or bull cause it will be "coercion"of his right to keep his bull or cow, but you feel "coerced" for not being able to sell the cow you have. So you complain to the Big "free enterprises" they like to call free market, and both "volunteer" to give all the power to the utopian almighty invisible hand of god aka"Free Market" to solve the problem so the elite still wins
You have two cows. You willingly give them away to the great Kim Jong-Il Because you sincerely believe he's the son of God on Earth and that he knows what's best for you. And the cows.
Government in what ever form requires participation even in an aristocratic dictatorship like the Hapsburg empire one could rise to power through participation and achievement. The cream always rises to the top. It's true in dictatorships and in democratic republics. Conservatives are quick to remind you. Human nature in their minds is to dominate over your neighbors. The Progressive view is one of survival in nature using the excess productivity to bolster the strength of the entire society.
You forgot to mention Republic. In which you have two cows, and have the option to either sell them or not get paid for the extra milk, and the government has to follow the law and respect your rights or they will go to court. This is the system of free economics and real money that our forefathers gave us and what Ron paul wants to restore. Please register republican, vote him in in the primaries and then vote him as president to end the FED, IRS DOE, DOA, and many more.!
Communism: You have two cows. The government seizes both and provides you with milk. You wait in line for you share of the milk, but it's so long that the milk is sour by the time you get it.
Dictatorship: You have two cows. The government takes both and shoots you.
Militarism: You have two cows. The government takes both and drafts you.
Cambodian communism was the most accurate. However, it should have said "and if you where glasses, know how to wipe your ass, or walk and chew bubble gum at the same time or were anything besides an illiterate peasant, they shoot you."
I prefer coconuts = Fascism: You have a lovely bunch of coconuts, there they are sitting in a row, big ones, small ones, some as big as your head, then Il Duce comes walking through the door and kills them because they're foreign. Anarchism: Somebody stole your coconuts. Zionism: Your coconuts are anti-semitic. lol random butt fuck it :P
@RareAnon It's not false. You live in a fucking dream world if you believe people will ever live in peace with one another. It's a pretty thought, but be realistic. As long as there are opposing political parties, different races, religions, and lifestyles, there won't ever be peace between mankind. And it's foolish to waste time hoping there will be, it's a waste of time.
@MarbReb Live in Peace? Just take away nationalism. That doesn't take Anarchy. I am being realistic. In most contexts being realistic. It will take a lot of work and formatting of our current system. But can happen. When all of those races and religions respect each other and do not force their believes on others there can be peace. I know its radical and unlikely. Liberalism isn't the solution either. If everyone grew up as me there wouldn't be a need for government. Discussing isn't wasteful.
@RareAnon Alright fair arguement. I believe it's against our primitive nature to accept people of different races, religions, or lifestyles. Not impossible though. It can be done, but without means of force, it's near impossible. Anybody can assimilate the world by taking will and freedom away and giving the only freedoms that government see fit. But then, that wouldn't be Anarchy, that'd be Communism.
@MarbReb And what if we learned that our 'primitive nature' to prefer our own race/religion/lifestyle, wasn't as natural as we've been endoctrined to believe? I'm white, but do you think that I prefer all the white people eat while everyone else starves? So, why should I trust that division is human, and that unity can only come with force? There is a mass illusion of scarcity, that is the core of our dividuous nature. We can overcome our survivalist nature, but it has to be within ourselves.
@MarbReb Yes of course, integration creates conflict, always has. I thought communism was no freedom for anybody, explain how communism grants rights and how they keep track of that, that is very interesting. I don't know much about communism myself.
turnbeutelvergesserB stupid dumb asshole.....do you have an idea how it really was in the russian communism??....i dont think so.....and for all dumbheads of you...russia haven t even reached communism.....they was on the way for it......but till 90ies it was officially still called SOCIALISM and not communism.......and people "all people" lived hundred time better than now with your fucking generous obamas democracy.........who ever you stupid unteached idiot are who made this video....
Sorry, Carsten. But your explanation of anarchy really sucks. Just like examples in the past showed, this would never be the case. What you ecplained as pure communism is pretty much anarchy.
@moinsimion Well, in a way pure communism is a form of Anarchy seeing as how Marx felt that the state would be unnecessary in the future. But yes, that wasn't a good example of Anarchy.
@moinsimion Maybe I'm missing something but let me correct you - the end goal of communism is to have the people in control with no government, just like in an anarchist society. There is a state in the socialist transition to communism, but not once it reaches its ultimate goal. As Kropotkin said, anarchy leads to communism and communism leads to anarchy.
@SebbeSucksBawlz For Communistic Anarchism, that is the case. You are right on that one. I was not complaining about the description of Communism, but on the one for Anarchy.
@moinsimion Well anarcho-communism is basically a more direct version of authoritarian communism. It's true that not all anarchists want communism, but ideologies such as anarcho-collectivism are generally seen as temporary systems used before moving onto true communism/anarchy. I'll say I didn't watch the video properly as I was more focused on the comments, so again, sorry if I missed something.
@AkiZivina344 History has shown that it is not a dream and it is possible to live like that. Also, I don't think that all humans are selfish, they are just raised to be.
Just so everyone is clear on one thing. THE EVOLUTION/CREATION DEBATE IS OVER. It was over a long time ago. scientists all agree that evolution happened. IT IS A FACT. stop trying to justify your ignorance by calling it faith. you lost. now tuck your tail between your legs and go home. lol
Title 42, Chapter 21, so-called "civil rights" act says that U.S. Citizens will be subject to punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind; the whole affair was a trick to get people to trade unalienable rights for privileges. Unfortunately, we've been cooperating with the deception voluntarily ever since. Check out my vids, Are You in Jail by Your Own Consent; also, U.S. Citizens and the NWO. peace, Ven, Musicians 4 Freedom.
this is economics and most of it is incorrect such as fascism witch dosent really effect what you do in farming except if your a different race than the original race of that country and anarchy means you can do what ever you want with your cows
@REVOLUTIONARYgs OOOH almost. It's which (witch's have pointy hats) Most of it was basically correct, just over simplified. Farming is very important to a Fascist, because today no one would trade with you and people need to eat, and under Anarchy you can try to do what you want with your cows, but most likely a local warlord will pretty much dictate what happens.
Cambodian Communism.
You have two cows.
The government takes them.
And shoots you.
Really?
CommanderFensom 3 days ago
Republic with a capitalistic state:
The guy with all the damn cows purchases the president, and then the presidential NDAA makes it so you get beat down & can't even complain that you have no cows & no way to get one, except to sell yourself into debt (slavery) … To Hopefully… one day save up & get taxed on the skinny assed cow you got burned on, Yo!
jatspageage 5 days ago
Comment removed
SnoweyMan111 5 days ago
this was fucking stupid and makes no sense. sounds to me like YOU'RE the dummy.
gprime85 5 days ago
Republic with a capitalistic state:
You have two cows
The government wants the cows
The LAW says that they can't take the cows
You sell one for a fair price
You buy two for a cheap price
They populate
You now have 4 cows.
<3 America
CantFearWontFear 1 week ago 2
FUCK CAPITALISM!!!!!!!
TheRadicalMinds 1 week ago
@mredstriumph Communism is a type of economy, not government. Therefore, saying communism forces people to do stuff under threat of violence is extremely incorrect. Communism has no position on how to enforce laws or what is the law.
Peaceeverbody 1 week ago 2
i'll take the harmonica lesson
Th1r1 1 week ago
Bureaucratic Socialism is a longer way to say Marxism
DjPyro2010 1 week ago in playlist Liked videos
This has been flagged as spam show
Please watch my story"TIFFANY LEBOUEF SEEKS JUSTICE". I have documents to prove my innocence yet no one wants to even acknowledge it. My life has been destroyed.
Look up PRISON STOCKS....very lucrative....WHO ARE THE INVESTORS???
I HOPE NOT THE JUDGES AND POLITICIANS.......
joanarc1111 1 week ago
i'll be honest, haha this is a really good explanation of the gov't systems. simplistic, but helpful
zulonz 2 weeks ago
I just graduated from being a dummy by watching this video.
k00LGuY671 2 weeks ago
@mredstriumph btw, in capitalism there is no/little difference between private property and personal property, in socialism and communism there is. Personal property is like socialism's/communism's capotalist private property. In socialims and communism, private property is differen from the capitolist private property.If you go even just on Wikipedia for example, you'll find an article called "Private property", read it.
Peaceeverbody 2 weeks ago
@Peaceeverbody
Under Capitalism or Communism, the prob of who gets the penthouse or beachfront property STILL needs to be solved. Physical limitations exist meaning everyone CANNOT have the best of everything
Under Capitalism, it's equitable in that IF you can earn or otherwise acquire the $, AND if you're willing to spend it (want it bad enough), then you can have it. Under Communism, these decisions are arbitrary. They are made by the party - w is led by greedy immoral pigs
mredstriumph 1 week ago
@mredstriumph
Under Communism, the decisions are made BY FORCE, CONFINEMENT, OR THREAT OF VIOLENCE. It's mechanics are punitive. It's enforcement is human
& fickle. The decision of the majority or commisar is NEVER suggestive. It is a lawful order & those to who it pertains get no rights or appeal.
Capitalism, in contrast runs via incentive. Disputes r arbitrated via a established set of laws and rules, which are governed by due process, standing,& framework of personal rights
mredstriumph 1 week ago
@mredstriumph Communism =/= Corrupt Totaltarian Dictatorship. Communism has no position on how law should be enforced. Neither does capitalism. You seem to believe in anti-communist propaganda that states communism = corruption and no rights and freedoms and no law, while capitalism = rights, freedom, and law, THAT IS NOT TRUE.
Peaceeverbody 1 week ago
@mredstriumph (cont.) Laws, rights, freedoms, etc depend on what type of government you have. (Communism, generally, is not a type of governent. That's why I would consider a communist republic, having the aspects of both communism and a republic, the best type of government, rather than a (false) communist corrupt totaltarian dictatorship).
Peaceeverbody 1 week ago
@mredstriumph I admit not everything can be 100% perfectly equal. If two people want a property, the one who pays more will get that house, and the one who didn't get it still has the same wealth as the person who brought it, one having the wealth in the house, the other in cash. It's still equal.
Peaceeverbody 1 week ago
@mredstriumph (cont.) Those leaders who you describes as greedy immoral pigs (don't insult pigs like that) are just that. But, they (Stalin, Mao, etc.) are not real communists because they do not follow any true communist ideas. The PRC, North Korea, etc. are not communist countries. They only are on paper, which was so the leaders could get support and then become greedy. YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT, AS I SEE YOU DO NOT.
Peaceeverbody 1 week ago
@mredstriumph And your comment on my channel actually goes against Marx's ideas. And don't post there, just post here. Ty
Peaceeverbody 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Peaceeverbody
"The theory of the Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property." - Karl Marx
Christ clearly believed in capitalism, & often used the concept of private property in his parables. Socialist & Marxists in America (Barrack is great for this) love to quote the "Brother's keeper" "parable".
They're unbelievers & too Biblically illiterate 2 realize the quote is an act of hubris by Cain before God after his ENVY drove him to murder.
mredstriumph 1 week ago
@mredstriumph People who put more effort into something will get more out of it. A doctor usually needs more effort to be a doctor. This is what Marx even said too. No, I don't think Christ was a communist because there is nothing about his political views in the Bible and I am not Christian. Also, There is a big difference between private property and personal property, that difference you can google yourself.
Peaceeverbody 2 weeks ago
@mredstriumph And those who do more expensive work or work that requires more skill obviously get paid more than a person who has a non/little skill needed job. And the comment you posted on my channel is involved with another style of communism than the one(s) I support.
Peaceeverbody 2 weeks ago
@Peaceeverbody
No, that's not obvious that different jobs would pay differently under communism. That kind of thinking promotes a society with classes. It creates inequality.
Aren't those the very "problems" communism is supposed to eliminate?
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
@mredstriumph Idk what interpretation of communism you think I support, but pure communism and primitive communism (kinda like Christian communism) is what I support. The only thing that those two ideas state are that people work equally and share with the community, but can still own stuff if they like
Peaceeverbody 2 weeks ago
@Peaceeverbody
Christ was a communist?? No. Absolutely outrageous."Christian Communism" is an anathema to God. Jim Jones' "people's temple" tried "Christian Communism" but had 0 to do w either Scripture or Christ.
Idk what interpretation of communism u think "pure communism" is.. but it's clearly not what communism's inventor says it is..
Karl Marx. "The theory of the Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property." = I've no idea w u believe
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
@mredstriumph Pure communism doesn't mean that everything is equal. In a pure communist society, everyone would be required to work equally, and share within the community easily. If you didn't do that, you just cannot live within that society any longer. Btw, I cant understand 1 1/2 of your two posts.
Peaceeverbody 2 weeks ago
@Peaceeverbody
No. Pure communism doesn't mean that everything is equal because the reality is one house, car, or plot of land isn't identical to another. Often one is FAR better, & another is FAR worse.
If 300,000 ppl want to live in the penthouse of the most expensive building in NYC - clearly they ALL cannot. Under capitalism, the person w the most $ spends that $ to buy the best. Maybe u think that's not fair, but what is? Its not like that decision doesn't get made.
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
@Peaceeverbody
(cont)
Under capitalism, it's egalitarian. The best goes to anyone who can pay the price for what's in demand. If u invent silly bands or velcro, or invest in the right stock, or start the right company or career, any can move up.
Under communism, one person still gets the penthouse, but the decision isn't based on $, it's based on politics. Some no qualification shmuck picks, & if he doesn't pick u, eat dirt, There is absolutely no mechanism to become successful.
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
@mredstriumph
(cont2)
Under communism there are ONLY 2 classes. Those who make decisions, & those for whom it is decided. Look up a word.. Dekulakization. That's what communism is about.
Ok, u want to "work equally"? I will "work equally" hard making decisions FOR YOU & deciding what is fair. You will "work equally" for me 6 miles down in the bottom of a mine.
My needs & tastes are more refined than yours, naturally I have the best. U have only the needs of an animal. Enjoy your pen.
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
In soviet russia all of us belong to cow.
SuperMrBentley 2 weeks ago
Well it's a decent video, but where is the Republic?? You know.. where government is forced by a Constitution not to take your cows and prevented from harming you provided you don't harm or steal from anyone else?
Where the govt functions ONLY as a soldier protecting you from invaders, a policeman defending you from theft, an impartial judge protecting u from fraud & peacefully handling disputes based on due process & equal protection.
Where the product of your labor belongs to you.
(cont)
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
@mredstriumph
(cont)
And where - IF - u want to be a communist, u go off and start a VOLUNTARY collective & leave everyone who DOESN'T want to be a communist the hell alone.
In TRUE communism, all 310 million Americans have an equal right to Oceanfront property. When there's not enough, Govt decides who gets to live there & who lives under a bridge based on party favors. If u want to be a doctor instead of raising cows - tough shit. Questions = fines, jails, prisons, & eventual execution
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
If you're talking about Anarchism in the traditional Libertarian-Socialist sense, it doesn't mean "no rules" or chaos. It means trade unions and the local community decides what the best method of distribution would be. An Anarchist society couldn't have money as its depicted here without some form State power to guarantee the value of the currency and legitimacy of the transaction.
jasondelauro 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't understand people's shouts for "real democracy" nowadays.
Democracy means the rule of a majority over a minority. Therefore it does not protect an individual's rights. Whereas in a republic you have a constitution which is guaranteeing your rights.
People should rather check the definition of "democracy" and "republic", so they know in which state they really want to live. We just need honest politicians, that's all. Even if they are hard to find.
MadameBeaujolais 3 weeks ago
@MadameBeaujolais
Honest, dishonest..if his hands are tied by Enumerated Powers, Checks & Balances, Competing Branches of government, Due Process, a military sworn to defend the Constitution & an armed public with the ability to call him on his bullshit to say No! - who cares if the man tells stories
He'll be bounced out of office so hard his head w spin
I remember once hearing about a country with rules like that.. now all I keep hearing about is the 99% & some lipsink-er formerly known as 0
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
MadameBeaujolais 3 weeks ago
Im high. Now im really scared.
1105weareanonymous11 3 weeks ago
This video got a lot right, but in anarchism everything is shared communally. If the neighbor tries to steal your cows, you call the militia to deal with him or you kick his ass. That is pure anarchy!
1truemisfit 4 weeks ago
Did anybody else laugh at the Cambodian communism?
DjPyro2010 4 weeks ago 2
@DjPyro2010
No. Because somewhere people are suffering every bit as badly in North Korea slave labor prison camp at this very moment.
I get that the illustration is clever, but somehow 4 million slaughtered Cambodians (out of an initial population of 7.1 million 1975) isn't that good of a joke. Hitler killed 6 million Jews 67 years ago. I don't think anyone would be laughing if I started telling jokes about that now.
Nothing personal, but if we don't start understanding, we'll see it ourselvs
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
Bureaucratic Socialism can be easier defined as "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need"
DjPyro2010 4 weeks ago
I like pure communism, just don't let someone change it into Russian communism.
Peaceeverbody 1 month ago
@Peaceeverbody
Yes pure communism is gr8 and all, but can we do that? I mean pure communism is discarding all the negative factors i.e cows dying, people getting lazy and not do their jobs.
yf8216 3 weeks ago
@yf8216
Pure communism relies on the idiotic premise that all houses are equal - from Oprah's to Antoine Dodson's, + location means nothing in real estate. Fresh prime cut steak is equal to ramen noodles & my 1200 horsepower dodge viper is equal to your 30yr old Yugo.
Hey.. u got a car, I got a car righht??
I've got a gun 'cause I'm the "will of the people". You don't cause.. well.. you're not. You're the 1%
The "will of the ppl" CAN'T give u incentive just cause u work harder, Prison? Sure
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
@Peaceeverbody
U like it? What about the idiotic premise it relies on?
That all houses are equal - from Oprah's to Antoine Dodson's, That fresh prime cut steak is equal to ramen noodles & that a 1200 horsepower dodge viper is equal to a 30yr old Yugo.
Someone gets a gun & claims I'm the "will of the people". & U? U don't get one.You're the 1%
The "will of the ppl" CAN'T give u incentive just bc u work harder - that's unfair, Prison for questioning the collective or NOT working@100%? Sure.
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Peaceeverbody
Each according to his ability, right?
And who are u to stand up to the 99% anyway? FU - If want your kidney. The 99% voted. U lost. Besides, u gave your right to it when u gave up control. Share share alike I always say
Now get in the cattle car & we'll see who has the numbers today - white or brown. White won yesterday, so they'll count the vote before deciding who has needs, & who has ability.
Just be glad you're not "the rich, the rich, the rich" (Jew Jew Jew) we are the 99
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
Learn what actual political Anarchy is fuck wit
Laidleypunk12 1 month ago
your video is shit and is extremely incorrect.
Chandler312 1 month ago
It makes less sence when you involve real money in an example where cows are supposed to represent your money.
boondocks123o 1 month ago
@boondocks123o
What makes even less sense than that is entrusting your government with the right to print your currency - and then having THEM give that right to a secretive, private, international bank that even your congressman can't audit
I guess if that secret private bank can lend them $ to expand the government till it's debts are the size of the entire private economy.. then that might be ok. But only if it lets them bail out Wall Street by devaluing my purchasing power.
TY Woodrow W!
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
Since pure communism always becomes corrupted, Id go for libertarian-Capitalist
WorldMilitia 1 month ago
Pure communism sounds like the best option, but id say its more like pure anarchy. Anarchy means the monetary system has to be destroyed
smashauthoritea 1 month ago
@smashauthoritea
Republic means if they're not your cows - leave 'em the F alone or I'll call the cops.
You want to be a hippy & live in a commune? No skin off my back. You want to occupy MY property & MY cows to start it - I have every right to use as much force as I need to STOP your force.
That's why you scumbags know your revolutions will always be bloody. The fact that in your heart u are a THIEF is why you never agree 2be a "communist" on your own. Commie=Slavemasters & pieces of shit.
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mredstriumph
Let me amend that to say CONSTITUTIONAL Republic means if they're not you're cows, leave 'em the F alone or I'll call the cops.
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
Anarchy:
There are two cows
Regginyaga 1 month ago 20
@Regginyaga Which are then stolen or fought over as others will have no cows.
RandomNameName 2 weeks ago
LOL at the dramatic sound effect
E46BMWDRVR 1 month ago
No one dumb lots of new laws
leeleonor1 1 month ago
There are several types of communism that spread across the world. When you said Russian Comunism I think you mean Stalinism.
LordMacKarl 1 month ago
@LordMacKarl
Or Leninism. Or Bolshevism. Or barbarianism - murdering people for being middle class (The De-kulakization) and slaughtering 12 million unarmed Christians & Jews in the genocides of Latvia & Ukraine - aka - the Holomodor 15 years before Hitler even dreamed of his "final solution"
(which u never hear about since Stalin didn't lose the war)
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Like this discussion? Check out my channel at riverlife695 for more discussions of social issues prevalent in the minds of todays youth!
riverlife695 1 month ago
Political system EXPLAINED
leeleonor1 1 month ago
This is an incredibly dogmatic video. This doesn't explain shit, the fact is I shouldn't have clicked on this video, because I know better then to think that all these COMPLEX forms of Government could be explained in 4 minutes.
chris96kalonji 1 month ago 6
@chris96kalonji The details and specifics no, but it does give a basic understanding of how they generally run.
DjPyro2010 4 weeks ago
pure socialism is not great,look at the israeli example,the kibbutzim,people lived in worse conditions than in capitalist countries,they couldn't buy cars or anything because they were so poor,now they changed the system and they are living much better,don't propagate a lie,in theory everything is wonderful,in practice it's not the same thing.
hilletehnoob 1 month ago
socialism definition is wrong
hilletehnoob 1 month ago
Is it just me or are some of the words darker than the others.
deepfreeze202 1 month ago
They got Fascism pretty wrong there. Under Fascism you'd give up the milk for the good of the nation.
DonQuigleone 2 months ago
Yeah buddy. It is pretty much like that for sure.
freedomwv 2 months ago
Pure Socialism was the one i liked most from this video.
stasisnu18 2 months ago
@stasisnu18
The video is conspicuously incomplete:
Constitutional Republic means if they're not your cows, leave 'em the F alone or I'll call the cops.
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
in soviet russia, u worship the cows
SuperMrBentley 2 months ago
@SuperMrBentley
That's India. In Russia Cow worship you.
mredstriumph 2 weeks ago
Wasn't bad, except for two points: under pure communism, no, you don't have any cows. the collective has cows. And under Anarchy, it doesn't matter whether the price for your cows and the milk is fair or not, all that matters is who has the most firepower. If you have the most, you can demand whatever price you want. If others do, your cows, milk, and labor are suddenly free...
Hiraghm 2 months ago
@Hiraghm You're right about communism, the collective has cows and the collective democratically split up the milk.
Anarchism though only means that there is no judicial or governmental body that has the right to control you or your cows.
LiBlub1 2 months ago
@LiBlub1 - no judicial or governmental body has any *rights*. Only individuals have *rights*. Governments have delegated powers.
Hiraghm 2 months ago
i hope america gets a surrealist government
TheRachelaudrey 2 months ago 16
@TheRachelaudrey giraffe meat for every plate and harmonicas for every mouth!
BrendanIsCool 2012
BrendanIsCool 1 week ago
you will get a like from because its funny but politically completely wrong!
1987infowarrior 2 months ago 4
wrong.
velvetguitar95 2 months ago
republic ?
but like last one hhh
Rabattop 2 months ago
According to this, a benevolent dictatorship would be: You have two cows. The government asks you if you need the cows, and if not asks you if they can have them. Then, they ask if you want to join the military.
AuburnAttack21 2 months ago
No I don't know what a cow is. And what's with the trading those weird creatures for milk?
(sarcasm of-course)
Meresortsitar 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and you left out unregulated capitalism - you have 2 cows you hire an impovershed child for slave wages to take care of them and then you sell the milk at an increased profit any milk that doesnt sell you pour down the drain - then you goto your local representative and donate to his reelection if hell pass a law preserving child labor - because its cheaper than school taxes
MrIzzyDizzy 2 months ago
Comment removed
MrIzzyDizzy 2 months ago
Comment removed
MrIzzyDizzy 2 months ago
resource based economy you have 2 cows and you donate them to the local dairy which roboticaly cares for them and roboticaly distrutes the milk to various outlets via the milk mangement system and you put in an online request for milk and its sent to you via robotical controled delivery vehicles in recycalble containers and you put any old containers in the vehicle to be cleaned and reused - have to admit this is best!!
MrIzzyDizzy 2 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
animal rights activist dictatorship - you have 2 cows and milk them then you are convicted of theft cownapping and cow slave trade and jailed - the cows are spray painted to prevent use of thier leather and set free - where a truck driver hits them and is convicted of and jailed for involuntary cow slaughter and the cows bodies are properly buried so as to prevent cannibalism - because cows are people too
MrIzzyDizzy 2 months ago
Comment removed
MrIzzyDizzy 2 months ago
Comment removed
MrIzzyDizzy 2 months ago
Libertarian/anarchocaptalism, would be: You have 2 cows you want to sell 1 cow but the other guy don't want to sell you the cow or bull cause it will be "coercion"of his right to keep his bull or cow, but you feel "coerced" for not being able to sell the cow you have. So you complain to the Big "free enterprises" they like to call free market, and both "volunteer" to give all the power to the utopian almighty invisible hand of god aka"Free Market" to solve the problem so the elite still wins
soyfern 2 months ago
anarcho-capitalism aka free markets
the banks hire assassin's to kill you and take your cows, citing a breach of contract
sikok93453 2 months ago
The definition of fascism, is essentially feudalism.
The king owns the cows, has his friends watch over the land and hires you to milk them.
This is before your birth, so there is no "taking" away from you.
sikok93453 2 months ago
anarchy? wtf! anarchy means no governmet! as @moinsimion said, "What you explained as pure communism is pretty much anarchy"
karolagreen 2 months ago
Totally FAKE!!! The man in the video has NO FACE! REAL PEOPLE DO!!!
solowenz 2 months ago
this is fake, everyone knows cows arent real
HomerJEDL 2 months ago
you have 2 cows: your wife and your daughter
ghiurfalau 3 months ago
Cambodian Communism sounds lovely. Hooray for governmental genocide!
1337wafflezz 3 months ago 2
имаш крава , пиеш мляко ! :D
you have a cow , you drink a milk! :D
TheFugees7 3 months ago
People are taking this video too seriously! Its obviously a joke lol (btw SURREALIST REVOLUTION!)
madamatv 3 months ago
surrealism! XD
SpidermanX1 3 months ago
North Korean Communism:
You have two cows. You willingly give them away to the great Kim Jong-Il Because you sincerely believe he's the son of God on Earth and that he knows what's best for you. And the cows.
luizcadu 3 months ago 33
haha I love the cambodian communism one LMAO!
thatkindofguy234 3 months ago
Government in what ever form requires participation even in an aristocratic dictatorship like the Hapsburg empire one could rise to power through participation and achievement. The cream always rises to the top. It's true in dictatorships and in democratic republics. Conservatives are quick to remind you. Human nature in their minds is to dominate over your neighbors. The Progressive view is one of survival in nature using the excess productivity to bolster the strength of the entire society.
geezerdombroadcast 3 months ago
Communisum is best
EASYE1996 3 months ago
Dumb way to show bureaucracy and capitalism isnt even there, neither is monarchy.
burns83 3 months ago
I think I read this "two cows" tale as a joke once. it's great for simplistic explanation, but this video can use an upgrade.
superdiza 3 months ago
Libertarian/Anarcho-Capitalism is the one I like the most for that very reason. It makes it so You can expand production as much as You like.
Nightshift10000 3 months ago
You forgot to mention Republic. In which you have two cows, and have the option to either sell them or not get paid for the extra milk, and the government has to follow the law and respect your rights or they will go to court. This is the system of free economics and real money that our forefathers gave us and what Ron paul wants to restore. Please register republican, vote him in in the primaries and then vote him as president to end the FED, IRS DOE, DOA, and many more.!
auditorization 3 months ago
Not to bad. I get it.
IMA60SKID 3 months ago
The sound in this video makes me wish for Russian Communists to take it away
GalactiCacti 3 months ago
lol. its not meant to be accurate, just funny.
debook454 3 months ago
Chuck Norris: You have two cows. One milks itself and the other flips burgers if it knows what is good for her.
siralucard19 3 months ago 42
almost all of these are wrong. lol.
pastafarianprophet 3 months ago
What about state capitalism?
marcuspotter4564 3 months ago
3:25 Introduce a little anarchy
siralucard19 3 months ago
Communism: You have two cows. The government seizes both and provides you with milk. You wait in line for you share of the milk, but it's so long that the milk is sour by the time you get it.
Dictatorship: You have two cows. The government takes both and shoots you.
Militarism: You have two cows. The government takes both and drafts you.
siralucard19 3 months ago
Very good
YouDolo 3 months ago
Fascism looks like a good idea
TheMarksmenCat 3 months ago
Cambodian communism was the most accurate. However, it should have said "and if you where glasses, know how to wipe your ass, or walk and chew bubble gum at the same time or were anything besides an illiterate peasant, they shoot you."
GiveMeLiberty3 3 months ago
I prefer coconuts = Fascism: You have a lovely bunch of coconuts, there they are sitting in a row, big ones, small ones, some as big as your head, then Il Duce comes walking through the door and kills them because they're foreign. Anarchism: Somebody stole your coconuts. Zionism: Your coconuts are anti-semitic. lol random butt fuck it :P
ComradeFolski 3 months ago
Surealism looks freakin awesome!!!!!!!!1
NoOneGreaterThanHe 3 months ago
That you called Pure Democracy, could also be called real anarchy. Anarchy is actually democracy at the extreme, with the people being the goverment.
Farvai0 3 months ago
pure anarchy is the best :DD
RareAnon 3 months ago
@RareAnon You'll say just about anything to make yourself look hardcore won't you?
MarbReb 3 months ago
@MarbReb i'm not hardcore. if everyone were respectful and civilized we wouldn't need goverment
RareAnon 3 months ago
@RareAnon Well no one will ever be respectful and civilized enough to be without a central government.
MarbReb 3 months ago
@MarbReb that is simply false, however people today cannot handle Anarchy, is true.
RareAnon 3 months ago
@RareAnon It's not false. You live in a fucking dream world if you believe people will ever live in peace with one another. It's a pretty thought, but be realistic. As long as there are opposing political parties, different races, religions, and lifestyles, there won't ever be peace between mankind. And it's foolish to waste time hoping there will be, it's a waste of time.
MarbReb 3 months ago
@MarbReb Live in Peace? Just take away nationalism. That doesn't take Anarchy. I am being realistic. In most contexts being realistic. It will take a lot of work and formatting of our current system. But can happen. When all of those races and religions respect each other and do not force their believes on others there can be peace. I know its radical and unlikely. Liberalism isn't the solution either. If everyone grew up as me there wouldn't be a need for government. Discussing isn't wasteful.
RareAnon 3 months ago
@RareAnon Alright fair arguement. I believe it's against our primitive nature to accept people of different races, religions, or lifestyles. Not impossible though. It can be done, but without means of force, it's near impossible. Anybody can assimilate the world by taking will and freedom away and giving the only freedoms that government see fit. But then, that wouldn't be Anarchy, that'd be Communism.
MarbReb 3 months ago
@MarbReb And what if we learned that our 'primitive nature' to prefer our own race/religion/lifestyle, wasn't as natural as we've been endoctrined to believe? I'm white, but do you think that I prefer all the white people eat while everyone else starves? So, why should I trust that division is human, and that unity can only come with force? There is a mass illusion of scarcity, that is the core of our dividuous nature. We can overcome our survivalist nature, but it has to be within ourselves.
Tzara86 3 months ago
@MarbReb Yes of course, integration creates conflict, always has. I thought communism was no freedom for anybody, explain how communism grants rights and how they keep track of that, that is very interesting. I don't know much about communism myself.
RareAnon 3 months ago
This is not for dummies, this is by dummies
teenangel69 3 months ago 91
You just made me a Surrealist.
owen82100 3 months ago
How did I end up here?
salx101 3 months ago
Comment removed
marcuspotter4564 3 months ago
Comment removed
marcuspotter4564 3 months ago
@marcuspotter4564 its not a political system
theonlydkdreng 3 months ago in playlist Foretrukne for theonlydkdreng
turnbeutelvergesserB stupid dumb asshole.....do you have an idea how it really was in the russian communism??....i dont think so.....and for all dumbheads of you...russia haven t even reached communism.....they was on the way for it......but till 90ies it was officially still called SOCIALISM and not communism.......and people "all people" lived hundred time better than now with your fucking generous obamas democracy.........who ever you stupid unteached idiot are who made this video....
yassinalter 3 months ago
ha russian communism was funny
jackinthebox96 3 months ago
Libertarianism sounds best!
semperFi4ever100 3 months ago
Sorry, Carsten. But your explanation of anarchy really sucks. Just like examples in the past showed, this would never be the case. What you ecplained as pure communism is pretty much anarchy.
moinsimion 3 months ago 18
@moinsimion Well, in a way pure communism is a form of Anarchy seeing as how Marx felt that the state would be unnecessary in the future. But yes, that wasn't a good example of Anarchy.
Jamez773 3 months ago
@Jamez773 I have to admit though, that the other explanations where really good!
moinsimion 3 months ago
@moinsimion Maybe I'm missing something but let me correct you - the end goal of communism is to have the people in control with no government, just like in an anarchist society. There is a state in the socialist transition to communism, but not once it reaches its ultimate goal. As Kropotkin said, anarchy leads to communism and communism leads to anarchy.
SebbeSucksBawlz 3 months ago
@SebbeSucksBawlz For Communistic Anarchism, that is the case. You are right on that one. I was not complaining about the description of Communism, but on the one for Anarchy.
moinsimion 3 months ago 2
@moinsimion Well anarcho-communism is basically a more direct version of authoritarian communism. It's true that not all anarchists want communism, but ideologies such as anarcho-collectivism are generally seen as temporary systems used before moving onto true communism/anarchy. I'll say I didn't watch the video properly as I was more focused on the comments, so again, sorry if I missed something.
SebbeSucksBawlz 3 months ago
@moinsimion I just watched the video (finally) and I see what you meant now.
SebbeSucksBawlz 3 months ago
@moinsimion Pure communism is anarchy. Anarcho-communism is the purest form of communism.
It is,however sweet dreams because people are one big moronic mass.
AkiZivina344 3 months ago
@AkiZivina344 History has shown that it is not a dream and it is possible to live like that. Also, I don't think that all humans are selfish, they are just raised to be.
moinsimion 3 months ago
absurd, but funny
I detect a slight bias in favor or libettarian anarcho-capitalism
aldenbuzz 4 months ago
this is really well made and informational.
CratersAndCream 4 months ago
Just so everyone is clear on one thing. THE EVOLUTION/CREATION DEBATE IS OVER. It was over a long time ago. scientists all agree that evolution happened. IT IS A FACT. stop trying to justify your ignorance by calling it faith. you lost. now tuck your tail between your legs and go home. lol
chuckwagon1645 4 months ago
hmm fairly accurate.
TheCommunistAvenger 4 months ago
Loved it. And it does have some educational value. :)
Yue2305 4 months ago
AGREED
taliban939 4 months ago
Nice, fairly accurate and amusing.
TheOilczar 4 months ago
I hate when i take a shit and the water splatters all over my ass
tenseman08 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Title 42, Chapter 21, so-called "civil rights" act says that U.S. Citizens will be subject to punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind; the whole affair was a trick to get people to trade unalienable rights for privileges. Unfortunately, we've been cooperating with the deception voluntarily ever since. Check out my vids, Are You in Jail by Your Own Consent; also, U.S. Citizens and the NWO. peace, Ven, Musicians 4 Freedom.
sharlenemusiclover 4 months ago
At this point, surrealism sounds lovely.
The1stPorliate 4 months ago 3
this is economics and most of it is incorrect such as fascism witch dosent really effect what you do in farming except if your a different race than the original race of that country and anarchy means you can do what ever you want with your cows
REVOLUTIONARYgs 4 months ago
@REVOLUTIONARYgs OOOH almost. It's which (witch's have pointy hats) Most of it was basically correct, just over simplified. Farming is very important to a Fascist, because today no one would trade with you and people need to eat, and under Anarchy you can try to do what you want with your cows, but most likely a local warlord will pretty much dictate what happens.
elephant37020 4 months ago
Hilarious, Bureacraucy is very well done.
pablobiteme 4 months ago