Its banned do to complaints and money. That plane probably cost anywhere around 25 million so imagine trying to find the same products and material needed then paying for it. The democrates or w/e wouldnt like that. So they forbid the high-tech stuff like that.
Did anyone hear the words "Using Sonic Boom Suppression technology"? I specifically remember researching that technology, what it is is that at the nose of the QSST there is a electro-dynamic field laser beam which is pulsed in front of the QSST at a distance of about 10 to 15 meters, which causes the air to become suppressed due to the electromagnetic field that is created. its the only way to actually suppress the sonic boom at 1.89 mach. :O
@dushyantx It wont be better, chances are it will never be put into production.....but there you go!....its a fantasy plane that will not be bulit......Concorde WAS built!
@snico I will BETTER than the Concorde and with 21st Century technology! Sometimes modernization and up-to-date change is good! Although the Concorde which was from the late sixties to early 80's was wonderful technology for the era.
This Vehicle has a shape that at certain angles is a reminder of the "sky fish" or "flying rods" that can also be seen on youtube. Also the squid shape is in there too. . Makes sense considering going through air is equal to going through water.....except the noise of this craft is pointed more down to have a better control of counter lift.
yea right, they're fighting against noise from aircrafts, at the same time allow f-ng motorcyclists making noice everywhere and thats ok..f-ng hypocrats
Why did our world's government not allow this plane to fly over land, I mean, come on, if it breaks the sound barrier at 60,000 feet like Concorde then no one would notice down on earth! Correct me if thats not why they banned it.
Because the american government didn't design this plane you dipshit. And the reason that lockheed doesn't make anything good for the american people is that most american people cannot afford $200 million dollars for a single jet aircraft, dumbass. If you wanted to buy this you could, you just need the money. We live in a capitalist society, not a Communist one.
why waste money just use one of the ufo s they have got hidden in area 51 they are free you fuckin morons i suppose you dont have a pilot good enough to fly them ? rambo is doing fuck all these days or maybe chuck norris ?
@lokman9800 Mach 1.6 makes sense for available engines we have at the moment. The F119 engine in the F-22 Raptor is optimized for supercruise at Mach 1.6 and therefore makes sense as an engine for business type QSSTs.
@lokman9800 the reason they DIDN'T make it go faster was because they wanted it be relatively quiet (in terms of sonic boom) going faster would make there VERY difficult to do.
@lokman9800 - Going faster also means more heating through atmospheric friction. The Boeing 2707 was to have been built almost completely of titanium to withstand the temperature generated by Mach 2.7 flight (around 300 degrees Celcius).
@JBofBrisbane It's actually the compression of the gas in front of the aircraft that causes the heating. If you've ever used a bicycle pump you'll know that compressing gas heats it, and supersonic flight compresses the air in front of the aircraft. Airliners that fly at high subsonic speeds are usually icy cold from the huge amount of air flowing over them, so friction is actually a tiny part of what causes the heating.
sonic boom suppression? skunk works? is the Blackbird II flying around up there somewhere silently, stealthily watching over the worlds hot spots? Dang Lockheed is seriously overpowered lol
Its a dinoseaur, and the boom is the least of its problems, stop this nonsense, how can you use the term enviromental with something like this other than disaster! Grow up.
Nice idea, but no go- forget all the Buck Rogers aviation dreams we used to believe in.
Look at the Boeing 787: cheaper for the airlines to fly, but slower & more crowded than a 707 was 50 years ago for the passengers... So long Sonic Cruiser, we loved you dearly!
It'll never happen.
32SQUID 3 weeks ago
Rubbish, It looks like one of those planes I used to make with paper! Bring back Concorde, its still a century ahead of its time!
yebadog 3 weeks ago
I want one!
DexterCornelius96 3 weeks ago
looks like concoard
harryc1998 1 month ago
ТУ-144
yurrri1978 1 month ago
What a shape and design!
I want to have it.
Let me have one!
kongcodebj 1 month ago
y cant any one bld this aircraft il buy it right away
svg571 1 month ago
yea sure!!!
shabtai143 1 month ago
Concorde!
THEMINDMASTER99 1 month ago
Sonic boom suppression? I don't think so.
cypresscoach 1 month ago
@cypresscoach anything is possible man, except curing herpes... that shit stays with you
Shazzamnwithoutus 1 month ago
+1 !
BLV
search : OMG UFO
SKYSURVEYOR 1 month ago
I hate this obsession with the archaic Concorde. It was a fuel-guzzling, noise-polluting, financially-draining disaster of an aircraft.
This is the future.
kramnodd9 1 month ago
@kramnodd9 Concorde is the most famous aircraft in the world, no one wants this junk.
SaveConcorde 1 month ago
@SaveConcorde
Concorde is nothing but a museum artifact. This aircraft is the future. It's technologically superior to the Concorde in every way.
kramnodd9 1 month ago
Comment removed
SaveConcorde 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kramnodd9 but if you ask anyone who if a fan of aviation they will say this is a piece of junk, they all want Concorde back.
SaveConcorde 1 month ago
@kramnodd9
Bugger off, your not a true Brit!
samosammo123 1 month ago
@SaveConcorde
Too right mate! I have subbed to you, i find that nothing can beat Concorde, not even the american Lockheed junk!
samosammo123 1 month ago
@kramnodd9
I admit it was costly but just for one Concorde to fly just once more, it would be fantastic!
samosammo123 1 month ago
lol yeah "half your time anywhere !" but burn fuel 5 times more :P
silverlalala 1 month ago
it looks likes a 10 y/o boy made that with Gmax!
VIctuszaphae 2 months ago
me = holy shit 60% faster than sound!!!!!!!!!
my bro='cough' concorde is faster
1lattibeaudiere 2 months ago
ok so 21 sentury, why is that not my private jet :)
monsterman48390 2 months ago
It cannot be the worlds fastest passenger jet because it doesn't / didn't / won't fly.
As someone said, when the Europeans were building Concorde, the US was building the 747. Concorde was a beautiful aircraft but fairly irrelevant.
smilo996 2 months ago
Wasn't it designed in conjunction with Sukoi?
EnigmaNZ1 2 months ago
Its banned do to complaints and money. That plane probably cost anywhere around 25 million so imagine trying to find the same products and material needed then paying for it. The democrates or w/e wouldnt like that. So they forbid the high-tech stuff like that.
trickster256s 2 months ago
What is the banned part of it about.
cohen200 2 months ago
"Mach 1.6" Considering that the concorde was mach 2 and some russian jet was like 2.2, this video is terribly titled...
LordFabs 2 months ago
its gonna be damn loud and noisy once it reaches mach 1
XxmcdxX 2 months ago
Comment removed
sonicflashful 2 months ago
NOW CRASH IT
AMERICANPILOT2 3 months ago
top of the comments....i could see my house from here
tenfiveracer 3 months ago
Did anyone hear the words "Using Sonic Boom Suppression technology"? I specifically remember researching that technology, what it is is that at the nose of the QSST there is a electro-dynamic field laser beam which is pulsed in front of the QSST at a distance of about 10 to 15 meters, which causes the air to become suppressed due to the electromagnetic field that is created. its the only way to actually suppress the sonic boom at 1.89 mach. :O
arshdeep125 3 months ago
eight windows? so that will mean 16 seats? it will never be a passenger jet! the embraer 120 is smaller than this airplane, and can take 30 persons!
123bendik123 4 months ago
@123bendik
perhaps you should watch the video before opening your stupid mouth
did you not hear 'business jet'
the number of windows has nothing to do with the number of passengers
consrignornt 2 weeks ago
Will NEVER be a Concorde!!!!
snico 4 months ago 45
@snico
It was never intended to be.
wstrong1711 2 months ago
@snico too true!
MrMajidaxel 2 months ago
@snico No shit, it will be better.
TheWarPlanet 2 months ago
@TheWarPlanet wont even be in the same league as concorde.....it will never looked up to as a great engineering master piece
snico 1 month ago
@snico nobody can do that
BUSMAN6000 1 month ago
@snico that's right, it will be much better.
dushyantx 1 month ago
@dushyantx It wont be better, chances are it will never be put into production.....but there you go!....its a fantasy plane that will not be bulit......Concorde WAS built!
snico 1 month ago
@snico I will BETTER than the Concorde and with 21st Century technology! Sometimes modernization and up-to-date change is good! Although the Concorde which was from the late sixties to early 80's was wonderful technology for the era.
Underdog2020USA 1 month ago
@Underdog2020USA It wont be better because it is never going to built....it was project that did not take off!
snico 1 month ago
@snico The Future's Concorde (2020) Will Be The A2 Supersonic Jet
TefkrosAirliner 2 weeks ago
Good Luck. Catching up with Britain but still 40 years behind.
AVMamfortas 4 months ago
@AVMamfortas Uh, Concorde was an Anglo-Franco mutual endeavor, 50-50 development. "Concorde" is not exactly an Anglo spellling.
MuseDuCafe 3 months ago
only the billionairs get to ride it, smh
spitgiezer 4 months ago
@spitgiezer smh= ?
zookeeper2345 3 months ago
increased productivity? no one will buy that to "increase my productivity"... they'll buy it because it's freaking cool!
DiamondPilotDan 4 months ago
I would like to see a flying replica RC of this beautiful plane :)
leocaldasbr 4 months ago
This Vehicle has a shape that at certain angles is a reminder of the "sky fish" or "flying rods" that can also be seen on youtube. Also the squid shape is in there too. . Makes sense considering going through air is equal to going through water.....except the noise of this craft is pointed more down to have a better control of counter lift.
XRayCam 4 months ago
I'm not concerned :P
i just wasted my time
forhumanityman 4 months ago
...Pelosi will get the 1st one...
fatbowe 4 months ago
false christ comes first
bullenchris18 5 months ago
yeah well lokheed didnt make the revolutionary XB-70. north american aviation did
TheMsdos25 5 months ago
yea right, they're fighting against noise from aircrafts, at the same time allow f-ng motorcyclists making noice everywhere and thats ok..f-ng hypocrats
ikapelus 5 months ago
Even if it did come out it still wouldnt be as good as concorde.
totalnathan1997 5 months ago
Since this is just a concept portrait of a super sonic imaginary plane, I'd wager my dick is faster!
Truemoderate 5 months ago
Why did our world's government not allow this plane to fly over land, I mean, come on, if it breaks the sound barrier at 60,000 feet like Concorde then no one would notice down on earth! Correct me if thats not why they banned it.
kirenjohn 5 months ago
@kirenjohn
Sonic boom can easily travel from that height down to the ground with enough shock to be disturbing.
ImmortalSynn 5 months ago
@kirenjohn
Concorde was too expensive. That's why it got grounded. It was about money, nothing else.
kramnodd9 4 months ago
Why is everything for businessmen? Why can't the american goverment make anything good for its people?
platinum243125 6 months ago
@platinum243125
Because the american government didn't design this plane you dipshit. And the reason that lockheed doesn't make anything good for the american people is that most american people cannot afford $200 million dollars for a single jet aircraft, dumbass. If you wanted to buy this you could, you just need the money. We live in a capitalist society, not a Communist one.
TopHattedPerson 5 months ago
@TopHattedPerson
you had me before the stupid, uneducated, "communist" remark, which makes you a dipshit, also.
consrignornt 2 weeks ago
@platinum243125
Because the American government isn't making this, and because taxpayers would never stand for a project like that in this day and age.
ImmortalSynn 5 months ago
why waste money just use one of the ufo s they have got hidden in area 51 they are free you fuckin morons i suppose you dont have a pilot good enough to fly them ? rambo is doing fuck all these days or maybe chuck norris ?
pierrelareux 6 months ago
QSST mach 1.6?? Concorde almost 30 years back.. concorde mach 2?? Come on guys.. Wake up!! We are now living in the 21st century..
lokman9800 6 months ago
@lokman9800 Mach 1.6 makes sense for available engines we have at the moment. The F119 engine in the F-22 Raptor is optimized for supercruise at Mach 1.6 and therefore makes sense as an engine for business type QSSTs.
mobius1aic 6 months ago
@lokman9800 the reason they DIDN'T make it go faster was because they wanted it be relatively quiet (in terms of sonic boom) going faster would make there VERY difficult to do.
MattB613 6 months ago
@MattB613 So is it going faster makes even louder sonic bomb??
lokman9800 6 months ago
@lokman9800 the sonic boom is the same i think it just makes it harder to disguise the sound if you go faster...
MattB613 6 months ago
@lokman9800 - Going faster also means more heating through atmospheric friction. The Boeing 2707 was to have been built almost completely of titanium to withstand the temperature generated by Mach 2.7 flight (around 300 degrees Celcius).
JBofBrisbane 5 months ago 10
@JBofBrisbane It's actually the compression of the gas in front of the aircraft that causes the heating. If you've ever used a bicycle pump you'll know that compressing gas heats it, and supersonic flight compresses the air in front of the aircraft. Airliners that fly at high subsonic speeds are usually icy cold from the huge amount of air flowing over them, so friction is actually a tiny part of what causes the heating.
PassiveSmoking 2 months ago
@JBofBrisbane would composite materials of today make this plane more plausible?
AFIsmailoglu 2 months ago
sonic boom suppression? skunk works? is the Blackbird II flying around up there somewhere silently, stealthily watching over the worlds hot spots? Dang Lockheed is seriously overpowered lol
kineticdeath 6 months ago
Its a dinoseaur, and the boom is the least of its problems, stop this nonsense, how can you use the term enviromental with something like this other than disaster! Grow up.
edwinstar100 6 months ago
i want concorde back D:
MultiShevchenko 6 months ago 2
1.6 mach, come on old.... sorry concorde hit 2mach.... catch up with time guys. concorde was just old before its time.
peteshean 6 months ago
SHIT SHIT SHIT...... there was only 1 ever supersonic passenger plane and lets be honest the design is not a beautiful like our swan.
peteshean 6 months ago
Yeah but, will it blend.
espido 6 months ago
If your important people will wait.
FlippyFloppyFAIL 7 months ago
Can china just steal the design and make it quicker? lol...
platinum243125 7 months ago
Would this plane be able to fly from Minneapolis to Tokyo???
Joe35983 8 months ago
QSST has been cancelled.
SEGANextGen2012 8 months ago
its speed is Mach 5 ?
darkgodnaar 9 months ago
Nice idea, but no go- forget all the Buck Rogers aviation dreams we used to believe in.
Look at the Boeing 787: cheaper for the airlines to fly, but slower & more crowded than a 707 was 50 years ago for the passengers... So long Sonic Cruiser, we loved you dearly!
MrNorthernRed 1 year ago
@MrNorthernRed .... not passenger jets.. its a business jet .787 is a commercial passenger jet QSST is a supersonic business jet
darkmaster24i1 10 months ago 2
I'm sorry, but the QSST project was cancelled nearly a year ago.
TheMarkOfTheBeast1 1 year ago
@TheMarkOfTheBeast1ARe yOu serious?
kenclyden 1 year ago
@TheMarkOfTheBeast1 would make no sense because then the video would have been put up afterwards
deccno 9 months ago
Don`t wait build it now, air travel is too slow, to go anywhere! at the moment!
Owendsexyman 1 year ago
thats a nice creation, but concorde had better looks.
dragonscape99 1 year ago