Added: 2 years ago
From: muckletoon
Views: 7,866
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (119)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I laughed so hard at the first argument of this vid. There is no explanation for this otherwise that it's an inside job.

  • i dont understand! that only 1 camra caught that first tower impact, im not an american but didnt CNN have the camra pointing to the wtc on the morning of 9/11 for a good amount of time, saying how much of a nice morning it was and then they didnt catch that snap, and a split second later they show it burning again! why no impact vid.. and i really disagree that only 1 person in lower manhatten had caught the disaster, a day like that, camras are everywhere in NY.. i maybe wrong but my opinion

  • Also the buildings should have never collapsed the heat from the explostion was not hot enough to bend the metal and abd the weight from the above floors were not enough weight to make the whole building collapse what is the government had c4 all in the building and at the rite moment boom

  • why the doomsday plane took off

    watch this,

    9/11 the third truth

  • funny the truthers are the ones who Dr. up the videos to prtray what they want...

  • @lojudah845

    the MSN broadcast these videos, go cry to CNN

  • I am gonna make a video called "1 reason you are not a New Yorker" if you were in the firehouse next to the world trade center when the jet flew just over head it sounded like a floating barrage of Mac Trucks, slamming into a building" You truthers should start using "pee wee hermans big adventure" as proof 9/11 was a conspiracy.you all know the part where Large Marge says " it sounded like a garbage truck dropped from the empire state building" well te govt planted it as a subtle hint about911

  • @911TenYears You do realize that you are making all of these nonsensical claims with all of the scientific data and facts all going against you and your theory right? There is no point in me even asking you if you have actually looked into this with any scientific basis or reasoning or scientific FACTS because quite clearly you haven’t or we would not be having this discussion and you wouldn’t have made such stupid comments proving your absolute stupidity and ignorance.

  • @boi187

    The videos depict fake physics, you're like a child who's just found out Santa Claus doesn't come do your chimney each Xmas.

  • @911TenYears See this is exactly what I am talking about when it comes to uneducated crazies like you. Why don’t you actually look into the mechanics, science, architecture, physics, and everything else technical, for yourself so then you can understand for yourself why your OPINION is wrong and flawed in too many ways to list. Because you clearly haven’t looked into it for yourself or you wouldn’t be making such ludicrous and ridiculous comments here on YouTube…

  • Comment removed

  • Has anyone here ever considered that the government's greatest power came from the idea that they might be behind it? How many people would want to mess with a group of people so crazy that they would bomb their own country? It gave them the power to do ANYTHING they wanted to do (get their oil from Iraq) Conspiracy or not the American government made the best of their situation.

  • at 1:06 (really one second after) where's the left wing to this plane, what else does one need to prove the vids were faked but one's own eyes?

  • Comment removed

  • No planes eh? Well what about the people on the planes then what happened to them? I smell big holes in this conspiracy theory

  • @nebula25x Yeah, I mean, you would still need to use some sort of explosive device to make the "plane holes" and you might want to have both thermate and use of directed energy- to make sure that those towers go down and there is absolutely no evidence left.

    So, I wouldn't be surprised if, yes, there was some thermate/ thermite at the site, while also another method was used to guarantee no screw ups.

  • @nebula25x I wouldn't be so certain that it was 100%$ controlled demolition.. Have you ever heard of Judy Wood and her hypothesis that directed energy was used? Some footage shows steel beams turning into powder, as in molecular disassociation taking place.

  • Plus all of this got debunked on Ronald Wieck's Harfire show right in front of the conspiracy theorists face: watch?v=vJDjb-qeOac It's a known fact that all truthers are disrespectful, weak minded idiots that never take the time to look at the debunking to see how stupid the theories really are.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • دروووج مو مصدقين

  • w..w..w.nexus-magazin.de/artik­el/lesen/11-september-die-drit­te-wahrheit

  • @S33ker0f7ruth

    it's difficult to believe they'd fly a fuel laden plane into a building that was rigged for demolition, there is also evidence of a white jet cruising the scene, no planes was a logical step when unravelling the hoax, shanksville and the pentagon are complete no-brainers. The first episode of September Clues is highly instructive.

  • but also, the planes never even followed the correct flight path. they should have flown NORTH to NH instead they flew SOUTH. this is according to the official story. somehow this doesn't raise bells in people's head that they just made up the entire story and didn't bother to double check details

    watch?v=3MHUi1DuwJU

  • 2.41 - 2.44 have a closer look !!!

    plane wing (left?) is missing ...

  • @muckletoon I saw then

  • @Amsterdam819

    what did you sea?

  • You love to say it shouldn't look like that but the thing is how is it supposed to look this has never happened before ! There was an incident in British Colombia of a small plane crashing into a building and the tail DIDN'T FALL OFF!! want the link ?

  • @muckletoon SHILL.

  • I can't tell if this is supposed to be serious or a joke.

    In the small chance it is serious, I'll just point out that millions people of people saw what happened on the ground.

    In the much larger chance it is a joke, I think it's a good spoof of the 9/11 truther movement as a whole. It points out the incongruity of their so-called "evidence" while not resorting to personal attacks, which they point to as 'evidence' that they are correct somehow. Kudos!

  • ACE BAKER-youtube user name collinalexander, and many sock accounts that advertise 9/11 ovies for sale-ACE BAKER IS A COINTELPRO AGENT, his operation is to spread BS theories and suck in weak minded people to discredit the truth movement.IT WAS NOT A HOLOGRAM.Something hit the buildings. IT WAS NOT A MISSLE.It looked like a plane. If you respect the dead in any capacity you will hear my words and please listen.DO NOT LISTEN TO ACE BAKER.9/11 truth wants a new investigation, not a no plane debate

  • What about the private videos that show a plane impacting?

  • @cassius969

    The money shots of 'F175' splatting the WTC defy the laws of physics.

  • @muckletoon

    No, they don't.

    Hope this clears up any misunderstandings you may have.

  • you just though you saw planes.. 160 ft wings span 737 ya right pal you ever been IN a plane kid

  • @CY0PS <---Yes I did, and so did 20 other people with me....then we watched the tape. So sorry to ruin your fantasy or your cointelpro operation. I will never say it was a plane exactly....but it had plane like features and hit the south tower. I no you guys hate me....you hate all of us who saw it. I feel sorry for you..

  • @FreedumbFighter28 exactly "plane LIKE features"...have you ever seen a missile that has been modified with holograms?? this isnt about denying 9/11 was an inside job.its about not taking backwards steps and only going for building 7 which was not hit by anything.No plane hit the pentagon but they said it was. ALL OF IT WAS A HOAX

  • @CY0PS <----OK.....Im just saying that "no planers"...IE holograms and tv fakery folks are liars, cointelpro, and sheep who will believe anything. Thats all.....

    I assure you, I am not the enemy. I also assure you, I know what I saw and it was a giant flying death machine. probably a boeing remote controlled plane made for military excersises. Im glad we could come to an agreement.:-)

  • @FreedumbFighter28

    Hate no, but I think you are flat out lying. Did you or anyone you know take a photograph or film the event?

  • @muckletoon <---As a matter of fact yes.....we went back to my neighbors house and watched it about 30x before I went home to be fed propaganda. Dont bother asking for the tape, it wasnt mine

    I was with about 20 people as well. Look man...Im not gonna go thru the whole story again if you dont mind ...All I can do is tell you I am not lying and the inventor of no planes is a goverment stooge. Watch the NIST evidence if you still think its a hologram or some other crazy cointelpro idea.

  • @FreedumbFighter28 at least you're not stupid like most people.

  • @lilblake90 ...Thanx? I think.....

  • @FreedumbFighter28 Herzanki, Fairbanks, Tina Cart, etc, all released films featuring the hideous fake flight 175 performing impossible physics as it melts into the WTC and out the otherside. You should try seek out your friend and his tape if it features the WTC being struck because there's a hundred thousald dollars to whoever can provide one, this sum of money has laid unclaimed for several years now.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Masterdebater747

    AMEN!! PREACH BROTHER!!

  • @Masterdebater747 <---I was in jersey city and saw the second plane hit. I watched it with 20 other people. Thats a day I will never forget....

  • @FreedumbFighter28 no you didnt

  • @Masterdebater747 Yea, I saw the 2nd plane hit from jersey city. Thats why I hate the hologram people. They are, IMO, just contelpro agents and gullible degenrates who will believe anything.They knew people were going to say that they were not regular planes. So they stuck the turd in the punch bowl before we had enough video to prove it wasnt what you thought it was. That was there blowback plan......Hologram, and energy weapons folks are just disinfo asses and ignorants

  • @Masterdebater747 <---Yup.I saw the plane too.I saw it had NO WINDOWS OR MARKINGS ON IT. IT WAS A GRAY PLANE. Probably a JASM made for TV live action false flag fun. Good thing FEMA was there running drills for an anthrax attack that actually came a month later....Whenever you want to get the inside track on this stuff kid....just give me a call

  • hey, nice blog.,, added it to mine, will translate your 115 reasons to german and post it in my blog! nice video also!

  • @metalfist616

    thanx

  • @muckletoon - whoops havent done yet ^^

    (im working on it :P )

  • @muckletoon i respect your theory but i think there was a plane but i liked it because its what you believe

  • Take a course on physics genius. Don't you realize that you are making yourself look like a total moron to anyone with half a brain. This obviously excludes Jason Bermas and crew.

  • @mdogpjm Did that physics course you took cover conservation of momentum? How does a plane hit a massive steel building and disappear inside? Where's the deceleration? Where's the deformation of the fuselage? You can even stop the video when the wing is 1/2 in/out and see there is no affect at all. By the time the tail hits how does it have enough latent energy to penetrate the facade? Because conservation of momentum is not observed in the video, the video does not represent reality.

  • no planes happened! 

  • Zombies are real - They elect our governments

    Most people are so deeply indoctrinated into obedience to the Totalitarian Mercantile System they will defend their right to beLIEve in the lies unto their death

    The government loves them, the police are on their side, the future looks bright, they love their jobs, the enjoy paying taxes, they live to shop to eat

    They would never ever suspect the tell lie vision of deception. It is their friend, idol, God

    Sorry, not a winner. Keep shopping

    2+2=5

  • The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects.

    Google "Quadri-Track ZCT"

  • are u high?

    these are little pieces . u can t destroy landing gear

  • landing gear is INDESTRUCTIBLE . why was is not found?

  • @DSCW33 - It was. Google 911 wtc landing gear. Why are you lying?

  • i didnt see pictures of it

  • You want to tell that to the woman on the street the nose wheel fell on that the landing gear wasn't found.

  • epic lie

  • @DSCW33 they simply were not found because the building was made out if kriptonite.

  • excellent video 9/11 was a done by the bush administration ,

  • If it really were holograms, wouldn't the device generating the images be destroyed on impact, dissolving the hologram before it could fully enter the building?

    While the theory does seem to fit, I doubt that kind of technology is available to mankind yet. Also, why not just keep a missile inside the plane? Why can't it be planes hitting?

  • So by extension (from your assertions/opinions) if you cannot make sense of something, it must not be real. How foolish. You and I know so very little. Just because things happen in a way you do not understand, do not assume the opposite. That's even more foolish then blind believers.

  • i could say "2 hours, why im a no planer" check out "from an idiot" on my chanel if you like to :)

    best wishes from kanada

    mart-kos

  • The videos are all real, some have backgrounds edited out.. The planes are holograms, advanced military technology. In one of the videos it shows a missile hitting the second tower from the opposite side as the plane, they both hit the building at the same time.

  • If backgrounds have been edited out and planes photoshopped in, that makes them inauthentic.

  • 2:27 and 2:49

    The pixel rate in these videos are absolutely horrible. The picture of the wing got cut off between two pixels which is why you can't see it, but it was there.

  • 2:11

    Of course it looks bigger! Any dimwitt in the world will know that when something explodes, it becomes a billion little pieces that spread out in all directions. That wasn't the plane, that was the cloud of fire and smoke.

    3:29

    The nose was not intact when it exited the building. It's pieces spread out in all directions causing that huge hole that spread beyond the point of impact.

  • The planes were traveling at around 530 mph when they struck. That's how fast they usually go. Another good try.

  • Dude, please stop embarrassing yourself, commercial planes can't fly such speeds at the altitude featured in those phony 911 videos, more hard evidence what we see in them doesn't depict reality. Google 'G-Force'. You clearly have no idea about what you are trolling on about.

  • Uhh I think I do. I actually have a life and research both sides. I've almost every single one of your little conspiracy videos and have watch youtube videos and television stations on the official events and evidence and debunking films, I have a clear understanding about what I'm talking about, especially with the video pixels because I've had that happen plenty of times in videos I've made. I know what G-Forces and I'm telling you, they can do that. Stop embarrassing yourself.

  • Comment removed

  • @mcspam2006 your an idiot you should have been in the building and seen the plane yourselves you are morons!!!! and certainly not new yorkers.

  • @mcspam2006 I want to shoot you at 560 mph out of a cannon into a building you will go though, and we will say it was a conspiracy. Please move out of the USA! Dont come to NY with that Knock you out!!!!

  • 1:12

    That looks faker than the actual video! Nice Try!

    And not necessarily. The plane was traveling so fast that it overtook the explosion and pushed it into the tower. Then, as part of newtons law, fire shot out the front and THEN the back, which was pushed back by the explosion both ways.

  • Sure, tell me the crash videos are fake because you know.. Your always right. You don't even have to explain anything without given any legit proof.

  • 2:09 - Well the nose of the plane is smaller than it's body so it wouldn't make any sense If the nose was bigger than it's body.

    3:29: How did the nose come out here? WELL, lets refer back to video 2:09.

  • I believe that there were actual planes that crashed into the buildings because I have seen 43 different camera angles of the same plane crashing into the south tower. They all look the same.

    0:30 Um ya... because the plane already crashed into the building

    0:58 - When a plane is going that fast, the fuel tanks aren't going to explode right when it touches the wall. All of the videos I've seen, there was no instant explosion. Why? Because its real.

  • the two explosion at 0:55 are the engines exploding u stupid piece of shit

  • titanium wings?!

  • and the plane still was able to fly under that weight?

  • 0:55

    lol wow

  • this is so fuckin stupid i love video editing.

  • its comparing the original footages you idiot.

  • what does this suggest

  • Just what I needed Mucks, thanks, now my brain's back to Mush. MAN they had a lot of help with tv/video fakery; I wonder if Hawk's Cafe is going to get down to that in detail.

  • well done me old mucker

  • Top notch video, guy!

  • class vid mate.

  • if i remember rightly people started making crap mash ups with no meaning and bits of porn. that's when i kinda went off it.

  • Yep. Another one of their endless array of distraction tactics.

  • Those porn mash-ups reached an audience that wouldn't have even considered TV-fakery, had they not typed in keywords such as "nipples"

    It's called "Website Optimization" or "Search Engine Optimization" (SEO)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more