Are you kidding? Have you seen the "Samaritan" demo?
I do like Cry Engine but they pissed me off with the cry engine 2 which totally suckeD! Cry Engine 1 was better in every aspecT!They could've done better...Cry Engine 3...i dunno...Have yet to see the character details...
@a55kika18 Uh what, I head the "Samaritan" demo is running on a Tri-Way SLI which is extremely exaggerated for a typical gamer computer. Unlike CryEngine it can run on so much more computers and still achieve more performance while keeping nice visuals.
I play crysis 2 with extreme setting and it's still not as good as this vid, that is a proof that crysis 2 are not using maksimum capability of cry engine 3, couse it has been compromise with console capability. so there is a great downgrade here all because console port. console port only make the game worst. suck it
Been playing Crysis 2. Cannot believe how beautiful the game looks and how amazingly well it's running at full settings on my machine that could barely run Crysis 1 on full settings. I know technically the graphics probably aren't as good as the first Crysis...but I think Crysis 2 is a prettier game. The use of light is so impressive and the atmosphere is palpable. Amazing work Crytek. Hats off.
@xAfroMetalHead1990x Cryengine 2 is heavily used in academics to teach game design, it was popular among indie designers as well ( though projects dont come to mind ) but since the release of Unreal Development Kit ( UDK ) which is basically a free Unreal engine with some restrictions, Cryengine's user-base had a severe hit.
@Medifro Ok thanks dude, and yeah every other game that comes out these days uses unreal tech, but now i know why. They're giving it away? No wonder everyone uses it hahahah
@xAfroMetalHead1990x there's actually a free version of Cryengine 2 released only for the modding community, which is the reason you'll see all kind of different mods on Crysis, not games like UDK. Just something i forgot to say lol
The demo runs smooth with two HD6870 running Crossfire, maxed out everything on 1920 x 1200. Which to me proves it is a lot better programmed than the original. The original is a great game, just very demanding to run smoothly which is partially because of bad programming.
@RadicalRaid yea I got on average 45 FPS on my GTX 470 on the demo on Hardcore setting. Crysis on Max I get around that so yea, its a lot better coded lol
@Danilko100 Actually from what I've heard Crysis 2 will be LESS resource-intensive than Crysis 1 and Warhead. This is excellent for me, as I can play Crysis 1 on medium settings on my AMD Athlon 2.5 GHz Dual-Core with 8 Gigs of RAM and an Nvidia Geforce GTS-250. If you've got comparable stats, or better, you should be good to go.
@CrimnlBT Well crysis 1 and warhead managed to look amazing even with dx9, and dx10 was only for advanced motionblur. But yea, that sucks fhow crysis 2 was "stripped"
@ZoldierrZzz Actually, yes, because console hardware is very limited, no where near as powerful as a pc, and not upgradeable. New graphics need to be patched, altered, and downgraded to work on consoles.
But there is no need to downgrade the games for PC. That is totally up to the game developers, it's not because of PS3 or 360 that PC games don't look that good. Most PC games do look more awesome than console games and you can change the graphic settings too. The question you must ask is why do game developers give you the option to change graphics on PC, but not as good as in this video? IMO because they want to save it to later and not give it away just like that, purely business.
@ZoldierrZzz But as there are more and more cross-platform games, the developers and publishers believe that to upgrade the graphics drastically for any one platform would result in a backlash of consumer interest and support. For example, if you and a friend had an XBOX 360 and a Mid/High-Range PC, you both payed for the same game, but the PC version had much higher quality graphics, the XBOX owner would maybe get a little angry. It also consumes more time and money programming for all consoles
I think what was overlooked in your conversation was the drastic difference in power even between the average PC, most people don't have a super gaming PC, so there might be limitations there. Making a game with these graphics, I don't think you could include enough adjustable settings to make it run on a lower end system.
This is very pretty and all but if Crytek insists on spreading development to consoles, that'll never be achieved in game. Cutting edge PC hardware kicks 5-year old console hardware up and down the street.
well crysis 3 will run on this improved engine but proly be more inprovments to look even nicer unreal engine just improved by useing direcx11 so both these engines are the best on the market so unreals catching up but cryengine 3.5 is lil bit more crystp
The girl walking through the forest almost made me fall outta my chair. Amazing hardly describes it. If Crytek can make games look like this, and make the story and gameplay just as amazing, then they have a truly incredible fascinating remarkable thing going on. Also it's really really neat.
For the people saying that Cry Engine 3 cannot run on consoles and stuff like that need to check their eyes. ITS SAYS "CRYENGINE 3 sandbox FOR CINEMA" in the beginning and then "CRYENGINE 3 FOR CINEMA" again in clear words at the end. If a company wants to show off the full potential of a freakin engine why do it in gameplay when you can just unleash it in CINEMA. For gameplay they have to worry about polygons, refreash rate, tesselation and shit like dat.
@Hergonan yes but games are always done in real time, this isnt for pre-rendered stuff it is for something that is interactive. and most CG movies take more like weeks and months to render out not days.
I'm in love!!! just amazing!!!! I've always dreamed of something like this since I was a kid and now is happening. Only need to get a pair of gtx 580 o a 6990
The current generation of consoles needs to get lost so the newer ones can MAYBE get a little more advanced.....graphical tech on final products has stagnated for too long.
haha do you really think Crytek did not take the PC version of it and didnt optimized it for PC hardware capabilities? check watch?v=FqCaEyItT7M and get over it already
Its only annoying that alot of games that where ported to pc aren't really nice to play. Sure they look ok but simulating a controller with the mouse just sucks. For example in first person shooters that got exported from console they often dont take the time to tweak the aiming, Glitchy aiming with pc is annoying as is, it's even more annoying when they dont even take out auto aiming. which actually makes you less accurate.
There are good games that got exported tho, but not many
Cant wait to play around with the Crysis 2 mission editor when I get this for PC, got a GTX 560 shipping to me tomorrow so hopefully its strong enough to let me create maps like that forest we saw. I will try and actually learn how to edit with the editor
@muiecopyright it's a known fact that macs are for smugs, and while some super expensive models maybe capable, they are inferior to a fully customizable pc.
most people will play free online games on the future. and the people don't play console game anymore. and after 1 years, diablo 3 and blade&soul guild wars 2 are released.
CRYTEK...!!!!! DON'T YOU DARE LET UP ONE IOTA FROM WHAT I'VE JUST SEEN.
If I find out that it's been toned down.... that my single HD6970 would be enough to max this game out in DX11 at 1080p at anything over an average of 30fps, I will be grossly disappointed....
CRYTEK....GIVE ME.....GIVE ME THE GRAND REASON TO PURSUE PERFORMANCE ONCE MORE...
*sobbing*..consoles...why..why do you do this to us...?
@cellphonelightsaber Because consoles have a broader base which means more money which means more resources for them to make new games for YOU. Jesus stop your constant whining about console this and PC that and enjoy the game without bitching about graphics.
@jayers2 What you don't get is the fustration that so many games for pc HAVE to look like it's developed for 5 year-old hardware that was already sub-par from the beginning. On top of that, you're asking me to enjoy Crysis 2 without bitching about graphics; the very reason why Crysis-- I give up.
FLOG THIS MAN, FOR HE HAS TAKEN LEAVE OF HIS SENSES.
@cellphonelightsaber I do agree with you to a point but its really not as bad as your making it out to be. Sure some of the textures suck but the overall art style of the game have vastly improved. Not to mention I have a 120hz screen and a GTX 580 meaning when its hitting around 115 fps all of those frames are actually displayed on my screen making it look buttery smooth.
It IS that bad when you open a game and you get a single HI MED LO for your options. (mebbe AF.. MEBBE.)
It IS that bad when you open a game and you get nothing but resolution and Vsync on/off. (Darksiders)....AND THEN THE VSYNC OPTION DOESN'T EVEN WORK. (not for me. CCC 10.2, 6970, Win7 Ultimate)
I have to show the boys at SEGA and SEGA Japan this. If we want to make a new game system, we'll have to have an engine that is capable of graphics BETTER than this. 1080p graphics, full 3d support at a constant 60 FPS (80 FPS theoretical if there was no 60Hz limit). Too bad the hardware for such a thing doesn't exist yet...But, only way for us to beat the big 3 at the moment. Even with Sony shooting themselves in the foot with their latest lawsuit.
Can't wait until they release this for free (like UDK\unity)... if they are still doing that hopefully... (saw it in an article online w/ interview from crytek)
@doomuk666 Crysis 2 Demo is just a crappy port over from the Consoles... , Supporting only DirectX 9 and such (since consoles only run DirectX 9 Hardware (as far as shaders and such go)...
Well the Crysis 2 multi demo certainly didn't seem to take full advantage of all that Cryengine 3 has to offer. The demo looks great, but feels lacking the attention to detail that the first Crysis had.
@sKratch1337 PC graphics are far superior to console even when they are new. xbox uses ATI xenos (r500) which even when it was launched was way behind PC graphic card performace and the ps3 uses a nvidia chip based on the 7800 (NV47). I got a Geforce 7900GTX just sitting in a box thats faster than both of those that I bought way back then. So games developed now are "dumbed" down for console which unfortunately is the way of things now.
@Zelmanchuk You only have to upgrade every four years. With the amount of money you save on buying games, you're spending less money on PC gaming if you already have an upgradable rig.
@Zelmanchuk and for retards to pick up 5 games a month and trash them just as fast. The only MP game that has had any longetivity sadly enough is the Halo franchise ... im still playing CS1.6 over a decade later ... why? Because PC gamers dont throw 2000000$ a year on every new game they probably dont even want to play.
@Zelmanchuk LOL!!! Spoken like a true old person who knows nothing about computers. Way to fail, man. Way to fail. Also, learn English and THEN type stuff.
@hydzior Umm have you seen how well crysis 2 runs? i can run it as a solid 30-35 FPS with a 9800 GTX. And it still a new engine so no doubt they will do even more optimizing in the future.
did not anbody see cryengine 3 is cinema. thats it clear winner.
DghOstKnight 2 months ago
My god CryEngine 3 looks fantastic. It's amazing to see real-time rendering that looks better than things rendered by God.
gyro231995 2 months ago 3
I find this video easy to masturbate to.
mp9206 7 months ago 10
1:21 I KNOW APERTURE SCIENCE WAS BEHIND SOMETHING!! >:D
Eduardogd2 7 months ago
gimme that car
StaggnGuvnor 8 months ago 13
holy motherfucka
spiritlight9k 8 months ago
so much for all the hype over unreal 4
Barderoth 9 months ago
Well, anybody can tell me, why Alcatraz, or Prophet or who the hell why needs a car? "Maximum Speed" then he runs away... Easier than buy a car.
FirstPersonSlayer 10 months ago
cool but consoles are no were close to matching that. Hell alot of gaming pcs would need a upgrade just to run the engine.
eldon498 10 months ago
HOLY ! ....MY GOSH
Thorndepth 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AND GOD SAID LET THERE BE CRY ENGINE!
Fredinosaur 10 months ago
DAYUM this was well-optimized. Runs very well on my MacBook Pro, and I don't drop below 25FPS on my dual-5770 desktop either.
KeyAttendant 10 months ago
WHY IS THIS NOT IN 1080P!?
P0WN4G3X 11 months ago
i dont care about shit, said nothing about dx11 or tessellation so FUCK THEM
TheUnstoppablePlayer 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheUnstoppablePlayer What the shit are you talking about.
Superduperhog 11 months ago
Unreal Engine 3 > Cry Engine 3
Check it out...
a55kika18 11 months ago
@a55kika18 Obvious troll is obvious. LMFAO!
12bobsmith 11 months ago
@a55kika18 More like Cry Engine 3 > Unreal Engine 3. Cry Engine 3 had all of those before Unreal those.
Superduperhog 11 months ago
@Superduperhog
Are you kidding? Have you seen the "Samaritan" demo?
I do like Cry Engine but they pissed me off with the cry engine 2 which totally suckeD! Cry Engine 1 was better in every aspecT!They could've done better...Cry Engine 3...i dunno...Have yet to see the character details...
a55kika18 11 months ago
@a55kika18 Uh what, I head the "Samaritan" demo is running on a Tri-Way SLI which is extremely exaggerated for a typical gamer computer. Unlike CryEngine it can run on so much more computers and still achieve more performance while keeping nice visuals.
Superduperhog 11 months ago
Why do you need real-time for cinema?
tornato7 11 months ago
64 antialiasing in this demo
Anton1987RU 11 months ago
@Anton1987RU O GOD MAH VRAM
cellphonelightsaber 11 months ago
I play crysis 2 with extreme setting and it's still not as good as this vid, that is a proof that crysis 2 are not using maksimum capability of cry engine 3, couse it has been compromise with console capability. so there is a great downgrade here all because console port. console port only make the game worst. suck it
TheCadazt 11 months ago
It will be a console game.
heyyyyyynow 11 months ago
Been playing Crysis 2. Cannot believe how beautiful the game looks and how amazingly well it's running at full settings on my machine that could barely run Crysis 1 on full settings. I know technically the graphics probably aren't as good as the first Crysis...but I think Crysis 2 is a prettier game. The use of light is so impressive and the atmosphere is palpable. Amazing work Crytek. Hats off.
milhuisen 11 months ago
Sandbox 3 wasnt included in the full release..but it WAS included in the leaked "BETA"...
Take from that what you want..
KINGKENNYTHEHOLY 11 months ago
Question. Has anyone outside of Crytek itself ever used Cryengine for their game? And that's not me being sarcastic. I actually want to know.
xAfroMetalHead1990x 11 months ago
@xAfroMetalHead1990x Cryengine 2 is heavily used in academics to teach game design, it was popular among indie designers as well ( though projects dont come to mind ) but since the release of Unreal Development Kit ( UDK ) which is basically a free Unreal engine with some restrictions, Cryengine's user-base had a severe hit.
Medifro 11 months ago
@Medifro Ok thanks dude, and yeah every other game that comes out these days uses unreal tech, but now i know why. They're giving it away? No wonder everyone uses it hahahah
xAfroMetalHead1990x 11 months ago
@xAfroMetalHead1990x there's actually a free version of Cryengine 2 released only for the modding community, which is the reason you'll see all kind of different mods on Crysis, not games like UDK. Just something i forgot to say lol
Medifro 11 months ago
@xAfroMetalHead1990x NCsoft made an MMO called aion with the engine but thats really all i can think of.
xxslayer66xx 11 months ago
Freaking amazing you can link straight to maya and get real time results without any model compiling?
cjhatesu 11 months ago
Wait so are the graphics in Crysis 2 going to be like this?
knockdoun 11 months ago
IRON MAN QUALITY visuals here....
except i have a problem with the look of mocap animations--no subtlety, in any of these engines' animations!?
facecheek 11 months ago
Does that mean we can get a super cool car in crysis 2?
Tinfoilpain 11 months ago
Is this going to be a separate tool from the standard development kit?
P4INKiller 11 months ago
The demo runs smooth with two HD6870 running Crossfire, maxed out everything on 1920 x 1200. Which to me proves it is a lot better programmed than the original. The original is a great game, just very demanding to run smoothly which is partially because of bad programming.
RadicalRaid 11 months ago
@RadicalRaid
The original Crysis ran much faster for me than the demo did.
P4INKiller 11 months ago
@RadicalRaid yea I got on average 45 FPS on my GTX 470 on the demo on Hardcore setting. Crysis on Max I get around that so yea, its a lot better coded lol
knockdoun 11 months ago
Comment removed
RadicalRaid 11 months ago
ive actually tried running this game on a oced 5670 and it runs maxed out in dx9 at 22fps stable so its way less demanding than crysis 1
sparta436 11 months ago
ive actually tried crysis 2 demo at max settings and i get 22fps so this is much less demanding crysis and better than warhead
sparta436 11 months ago
lolzor that buggy ''realtime'' demo won't be done by a household pc for at least another 2-4 years. Maybe a ps5 will run it rofl.
Crysis2 demo is fun though
goodflo911 11 months ago
love the music that starts at 1.29
bissetl 11 months ago
now that the Radeon HD 6990 is out I would like to see how it will handle this game
drftme 1 year ago
I'm gonna install Crysis 2 and my PC will say "Why do you want to torture me ?!"
Danilko100 1 year ago
@Danilko100 Actually from what I've heard Crysis 2 will be LESS resource-intensive than Crysis 1 and Warhead. This is excellent for me, as I can play Crysis 1 on medium settings on my AMD Athlon 2.5 GHz Dual-Core with 8 Gigs of RAM and an Nvidia Geforce GTS-250. If you've got comparable stats, or better, you should be good to go.
HZJMee 1 year ago
Please make a sandbox game with the cry engine 3
ep010 1 year ago
great. now i needa buy 4 GTX560's. my shithouse 9800gt will get fried on this game in minimum settings.
Quarker99 1 year ago
I love @ 1:35 the character on screen is looking all badass and the guy doing the mocap is grinning and stuff.
Vaughnlesterinoz 1 year ago
Crysis 2 looked like shit, this on the other hand
Praylv 1 year ago
@Praylv crysis 2 til now is only dx9 on "middle-high" even if you choose "hardcore"
CrimnlBT 1 year ago
@CrimnlBT Well crysis 1 and warhead managed to look amazing even with dx9, and dx10 was only for advanced motionblur. But yea, that sucks fhow crysis 2 was "stripped"
Praylv 1 year ago
@Praylv No one has seen the dx10 or 11 versions of crysis 2 yet for pc. The demo was only 9
jeremywkx 1 year ago
@jeremywkx Well, directx 10 or 11 possibly cant change anything much, unless they'll include higher quality settings for those rendering modes
Praylv 1 year ago
shut the fuck up you cunt crappers.
CowHoofOnAHotPlate 1 year ago
soundtrack is very similar to one from the Unreal Tournament 99
gouseinov 1 year ago
HOLY FLAMING DICKS
PvPisMyDrug 1 year ago
Achieved with power of the PC :P
squwewe 1 year ago
OMG !!!! for cinema
namhaitac 1 year ago
In 40 years when I get a PC that can run this, I will have fun
JuniorProducer1996 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
peek into fure console gaming is what PC does now
0SoulxReaper0 1 year ago
peek into fure console gaming is what PC does now
0SoulxReaper0 1 year ago
Why MAC OS always nothing.... i mean the advance stuff about DX....
superdogggy 1 year ago
cant wait for crysis2!!
but what 'for cinema' means in this cryengine3?
SulfurousReview 1 year ago
@SulfurousReview What you see is what you play. This was all real time. Meaning that you you could go in-game and actually do that.
VincentHadden 1 year ago
@SulfurousReview It means it can be used to render 3D animated films.
sunset261 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now go back to making PC exclusives so we can actually see this shit in a game.
Colethecon 1 year ago 74
@Colethecon AMEN!
musiclover1350 1 year ago
@Colethecon
You mean they don't use these graphics in games because of consoles? Lol, come on.
ZoldierrZzz 9 months ago
@ZoldierrZzz Actually, yes, because console hardware is very limited, no where near as powerful as a pc, and not upgradeable. New graphics need to be patched, altered, and downgraded to work on consoles.
Colethecon 9 months ago
@Colethecon
But there is no need to downgrade the games for PC. That is totally up to the game developers, it's not because of PS3 or 360 that PC games don't look that good. Most PC games do look more awesome than console games and you can change the graphic settings too. The question you must ask is why do game developers give you the option to change graphics on PC, but not as good as in this video? IMO because they want to save it to later and not give it away just like that, purely business.
ZoldierrZzz 9 months ago
@ZoldierrZzz But as there are more and more cross-platform games, the developers and publishers believe that to upgrade the graphics drastically for any one platform would result in a backlash of consumer interest and support. For example, if you and a friend had an XBOX 360 and a Mid/High-Range PC, you both payed for the same game, but the PC version had much higher quality graphics, the XBOX owner would maybe get a little angry. It also consumes more time and money programming for all consoles
Colethecon 9 months ago
@Colethecon
It's not like that.
ZoldierrZzz 9 months ago
@ZoldierrZzz It is exactly like that, my friend.
Colethecon 9 months ago
@Colethecon
No dude, it is also hardware related.
ZoldierrZzz 9 months ago
@ZoldierrZzz I already said that.
Colethecon 9 months ago
@ZoldierrZzz exatly lol.
XpEAnUTBuTtERsUckSX 7 months ago
@ZoldierrZzz
I think what was overlooked in your conversation was the drastic difference in power even between the average PC, most people don't have a super gaming PC, so there might be limitations there. Making a game with these graphics, I don't think you could include enough adjustable settings to make it run on a lower end system.
AppleGurl192 5 months ago
@AppleGurl192 Your name says it all. You're an ignorant hipster female.
FapioLopez 4 months ago
@Colethecon
Moneyz Brought them there.
The only way to get them back is more MONEYZ.
keshaz12 7 months ago
Looks like a good movie..
toavama1 1 year ago
frostbite 2 kicks this in the nuts.
SatanKreator 1 year ago
nope
VALVEGAMER20 1 year ago
This is very pretty and all but if Crytek insists on spreading development to consoles, that'll never be achieved in game. Cutting edge PC hardware kicks 5-year old console hardware up and down the street.
SpartanCarver 1 year ago
this looks better than battelfield 3 has showed
jiggy55jiggy 1 year ago
well crysis 3 will run on this improved engine but proly be more inprovments to look even nicer unreal engine just improved by useing direcx11 so both these engines are the best on the market so unreals catching up but cryengine 3.5 is lil bit more crystp
dstyles1810 1 year ago
I would like to see specs on that com
Awia00 1 year ago
this is the potentiall of pc gaming,but thx to consoles and pirate nobody gonna take the risk of making an ambitious game using those graphics
DJBV 1 year ago
All this and there Crysis 2 PC currently only runs on Directx 9. When do we get to fully unleash the beast?
Ruination46 1 year ago
The girl walking through the forest almost made me fall outta my chair. Amazing hardly describes it. If Crytek can make games look like this, and make the story and gameplay just as amazing, then they have a truly incredible fascinating remarkable thing going on. Also it's really really neat.
TheScatsbury 1 year ago
I think pc gamers want graphics to be as realistic as possible because they dont want go outside
Bubbiea 1 year ago
@Bubbiea And yet most PC gamers still have an IQ above 10.
ZetaMan117 1 year ago
For the people saying that Cry Engine 3 cannot run on consoles and stuff like that need to check their eyes. ITS SAYS "CRYENGINE 3 sandbox FOR CINEMA" in the beginning and then "CRYENGINE 3 FOR CINEMA" again in clear words at the end. If a company wants to show off the full potential of a freakin engine why do it in gameplay when you can just unleash it in CINEMA. For gameplay they have to worry about polygons, refreash rate, tesselation and shit like dat.
Goliath25 1 year ago
@Goliath25 why would they say "in realtime" then?
cinema is almost never realtime.
pixar's things take days to render with a supercomputer for exampe.
Hergonan 1 year ago
@Hergonan yes but games are always done in real time, this isnt for pre-rendered stuff it is for something that is interactive. and most CG movies take more like weeks and months to render out not days.
passerby500 1 year ago
@Hergonan Thanks for clearing it for me. I was thinking of something else and misfired the "in realtime" part
Goliath25 1 year ago
I'm in love!!! just amazing!!!! I've always dreamed of something like this since I was a kid and now is happening. Only need to get a pair of gtx 580 o a 6990
martinzopetazo 1 year ago
The current generation of consoles needs to get lost so the newer ones can MAYBE get a little more advanced.....graphical tech on final products has stagnated for too long.
LumpyChiPmunk 1 year ago
Achieved with CryEngine 3 on PC
riniks112 1 year ago
wtf it looks better than real life. lol
Li0nSword 1 year ago 8
@Li0nSword Of course. Crysis' graphical prowess is based only on general shininess.
OnlyLifeMatters 11 months ago
13 people who are pouty that they cant run crysis 2.
SquallRinoa89 1 year ago
haha do you really think Crytek did not take the PC version of it and didnt optimized it for PC hardware capabilities? check watch?v=FqCaEyItT7M and get over it already
sofukingwhat 1 year ago
@sofukingwhat
Its only annoying that alot of games that where ported to pc aren't really nice to play. Sure they look ok but simulating a controller with the mouse just sucks. For example in first person shooters that got exported from console they often dont take the time to tweak the aiming, Glitchy aiming with pc is annoying as is, it's even more annoying when they dont even take out auto aiming. which actually makes you less accurate.
There are good games that got exported tho, but not many
RoelorD 1 year ago
only thing lacking is depth of field! like the new UE!
megacomrade 1 year ago
i clicked to watch this video on my other computer and it exploded.
BillyChaka 1 year ago
Cant wait to play around with the Crysis 2 mission editor when I get this for PC, got a GTX 560 shipping to me tomorrow so hopefully its strong enough to let me create maps like that forest we saw. I will try and actually learn how to edit with the editor
COLDICEPro 1 year ago
Long lives the PC!!!!
Thumbs up or you are a console whore!!
MartinKification 1 year ago 97
This has been flagged as spam show
thumbs up if u JIZZED!
TheNorwegianBadBoy97 1 year ago
normaly i can watch videos in 720p but not this!!!
TheNorwegianBadBoy97 1 year ago
OMG this looks so could i could cry, oohh now i know why its called the cry engine... hmmmm....
Vladflame 1 year ago
this is awesome, what is the name of the song?
georgbernier 1 year ago
Create a game with it!!! MMORPG StarCraft!!!
Terskov 1 year ago
Wow, I was amazed by Unreal's new engine update for a few days... I'm pleasantly reminded that it's not the only one doing cool things.
krayvis 1 year ago
Amazing
SEBAVENGER 1 year ago
CRYTEK FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!! THUMBS UP PEOPLEEEEE!!!!
stefbcrich 1 year ago
Can you do this shit with a mac NOOOOO.
muiecopyright 1 year ago 108
@muiecopyright it's a known fact that macs are for smugs, and while some super expensive models maybe capable, they are inferior to a fully customizable pc.
ALPHAHXCORE 1 year ago
@muiecopyright HAHA LOOL. Poor Macfags
Dzdosv42 1 year ago
I can see myself living in this video.
logface101 1 year ago
looks great!
ikkeennigij121 1 year ago
I wanna try that live motion capture thing
d00msdaydan 1 year ago
most people will play free online games on the future. and the people don't play console game anymore. and after 1 years, diablo 3 and blade&soul guild wars 2 are released.
i8hy6e3 1 year ago
and this is the engine they used for Crysis 2! 80
rebone 1 year ago
On another note...
O FUCK, THE HD6990 IS HERE. 450 WATTS MAX POWER DRAW.
cellphonelightsaber 1 year ago
CRYTEK...!!!!! DON'T YOU DARE LET UP ONE IOTA FROM WHAT I'VE JUST SEEN.
If I find out that it's been toned down.... that my single HD6970 would be enough to max this game out in DX11 at 1080p at anything over an average of 30fps, I will be grossly disappointed....
CRYTEK....GIVE ME.....GIVE ME THE GRAND REASON TO PURSUE PERFORMANCE ONCE MORE...
*sobbing*..consoles...why..why do you do this to us...?
cellphonelightsaber 1 year ago
@cellphonelightsaber
lol
1986wumpscut 1 year ago
@cellphonelightsaber Because consoles have a broader base which means more money which means more resources for them to make new games for YOU. Jesus stop your constant whining about console this and PC that and enjoy the game without bitching about graphics.
jayers2 1 year ago
@jayers2 What you don't get is the fustration that so many games for pc HAVE to look like it's developed for 5 year-old hardware that was already sub-par from the beginning. On top of that, you're asking me to enjoy Crysis 2 without bitching about graphics; the very reason why Crysis-- I give up.
FLOG THIS MAN, FOR HE HAS TAKEN LEAVE OF HIS SENSES.
cellphonelightsaber 1 year ago 18
@cellphonelightsaber I do agree with you to a point but its really not as bad as your making it out to be. Sure some of the textures suck but the overall art style of the game have vastly improved. Not to mention I have a 120hz screen and a GTX 580 meaning when its hitting around 115 fps all of those frames are actually displayed on my screen making it look buttery smooth.
xxslayer66xx 11 months ago
@xxslayer66xx first off, nice card.
It IS that bad when you open a game and you get a single HI MED LO for your options. (mebbe AF.. MEBBE.)
It IS that bad when you open a game and you get nothing but resolution and Vsync on/off. (Darksiders)....AND THEN THE VSYNC OPTION DOESN'T EVEN WORK. (not for me. CCC 10.2, 6970, Win7 Ultimate)
cellphonelightsaber 11 months ago
AWESOME SHIT MAN.
smlwong 1 year ago
O boy if i run this on my computer. my computer won't even last a min
HANEHANE08 1 year ago
be right back, need a change of pants
gamerx9191 1 year ago
I have to show the boys at SEGA and SEGA Japan this. If we want to make a new game system, we'll have to have an engine that is capable of graphics BETTER than this. 1080p graphics, full 3d support at a constant 60 FPS (80 FPS theoretical if there was no 60Hz limit). Too bad the hardware for such a thing doesn't exist yet...But, only way for us to beat the big 3 at the moment. Even with Sony shooting themselves in the foot with their latest lawsuit.
SEGAAwakens 1 year ago
@SEGAAwakens Ok troll, you got me. It's called an i7 2600k, 12GB of 2000MHz DDR3 and 4 GTX 580's in SLI.
Oh yeah, and a plasma tv that has a refresh rate of 600hz. Bye-bye framecap.
cellphonelightsaber 1 year ago
Can't wait until they release this for free (like UDK\unity)... if they are still doing that hopefully... (saw it in an article online w/ interview from crytek)
speewave 1 year ago
couldnt see that in crysis 2,which graphic is bad,
doomuk666 1 year ago
@doomuk666 Crysis 2 Demo is just a crappy port over from the Consoles... , Supporting only DirectX 9 and such (since consoles only run DirectX 9 Hardware (as far as shaders and such go)...
CryEngine 3 on Computer is going to be awesome...
speewave 1 year ago
@ice1cc dont worry we will then the next consoles comes out :)
RauLOneLife 1 year ago
Music? :D
brainj3 1 year ago
I will buy the game right now if i can drive that thing!!!
ravensharpless 1 year ago
Well the Crysis 2 multi demo certainly didn't seem to take full advantage of all that Cryengine 3 has to offer. The demo looks great, but feels lacking the attention to detail that the first Crysis had.
FrPSh 1 year ago
simply amazing. Video games have come a long way
vicente321 1 year ago
I want to see someone actually make something cool with this. Like, even a shortfilm. Use the mocap , and act out a scene.
atarimon 1 year ago
Why does it keep saying "real time" if its just for movies anyways?
ac1th 1 year ago
@ac1th To tell the viewers that this is what it would look like if you were playing..?
sKratch1337 1 year ago
So what is the song?
KarzafalHimself 1 year ago
no description available
cuz nothing can describe this ,, OMG
Hemo0o89 1 year ago 5
Be careful because it still crashes a lot as said by students who tested it at universities and colleges...
somebodychileno 1 year ago
too bad more and more of the new games are being designed to run in console crap which could never handle what we are seeing here.
woojyee 1 year ago 83
@woojyee I believe that the Xbox 360 and the Playstation 3 is... 5 years old now? They were good, but it's time for an upgrade...
sKratch1337 1 year ago
@sKratch1337 PC graphics are far superior to console even when they are new. xbox uses ATI xenos (r500) which even when it was launched was way behind PC graphic card performace and the ps3 uses a nvidia chip based on the 7800 (NV47). I got a Geforce 7900GTX just sitting in a box thats faster than both of those that I bought way back then. So games developed now are "dumbed" down for console which unfortunately is the way of things now.
woojyee 1 year ago
Comment removed
bboytrigger123 1 year ago
@woojyee Consoles originaly for games, PC for work and for sucking out money for such called "upgrades".
Zelmanchuk 1 year ago
@Zelmanchuk You only have to upgrade every four years. With the amount of money you save on buying games, you're spending less money on PC gaming if you already have an upgradable rig.
Freak2121GTAF 1 year ago
@Zelmanchuk and for retards to pick up 5 games a month and trash them just as fast. The only MP game that has had any longetivity sadly enough is the Halo franchise ... im still playing CS1.6 over a decade later ... why? Because PC gamers dont throw 2000000$ a year on every new game they probably dont even want to play.
ColdfireTrilogy 1 year ago
@Zelmanchuk LOL!!! Spoken like a true old person who knows nothing about computers. Way to fail, man. Way to fail. Also, learn English and THEN type stuff.
AmericaSays 1 year ago 2
@woojyee Say thanks to torrent users.
Thunderbourne 1 year ago
@woojyee
I can't even imagine how awesome Crysis 2 would have looked if it didn't come out for consols but nooooooooooooooo.
Nightmare78hAlo 1 year ago
@woojyee Say thanks to torrent users.
Thunderbourne 1 year ago
@woojyee you do know this engine is for the consoles too and they are design to be cross platform
keiluko 1 year ago
@keiluko yup you are right but partially! cz consoles can't utilize dx10 and dx11 which pc can.
oroop055 1 year ago
@keiluko But still not good looking enough.
FastFlyerJr 1 year ago
@keiluko they're but if you want a good performance you need to forget about this kind of visuals :] .
hydzior 1 year ago
@hydzior Umm have you seen how well crysis 2 runs? i can run it as a solid 30-35 FPS with a 9800 GTX. And it still a new engine so no doubt they will do even more optimizing in the future.
sunset261 1 year ago
@woojyee
The PS4 and XBOX 720 will.
The way I see it, this is a peek into the future of console gaming.
Sposchy 1 year ago
@Sposchy Dont be so sure ;] .
hydzior 1 year ago
@Sposchy though consoles will always be slower than pc xP
CrimnlBT 1 year ago
@CrimnlBT
Of course. Consoles don't update as technology advances.
Sposchy 1 year ago