Response to Natural Law Arguments in Gays and Church Blogversation

[guilhermesazonov]

"vastly sinful place" instead of "vastly complex"

"just because"?! aristotle? or in other videos "human rights"?! :P who is this guy? the false prophet? so now sin is a matter of semantics? "other types of long term love"??! Clearly this guy either:

1- is one of those nuts who come out of seminar...

2- a frustrated philosopher which brain couldn't handle and had a psychotic breakdown

3- a wolf on sheep clothes....an instrument of the enemy (like so many others in history)

...

[guilhermesazonov]

..so, this guy above states that is "relative"? so who said so? you? are you sure? your statement is na absolute.

as long asthis apparently twist or damaged by drugs (maybe) brain, or intrument of the enemycontinue his intelectual ejaculation, he will be on this endless process, applying sinful, mankind standards to the Holy: "human rights", "semantics", "relative", "your experience of been born again is sth kind of biological rush"....Tony, you are not the first one and neither will be the last

[tulip1619]

An honest postmodern. 1:30 "I've moved away from that...because MY EXPERIENCE of the world is...". So, if Scripture (Rom. 1 et al.) clearly reveals that there is a basic moral law written on all hearts and Christian Tradition says the same thing (even though Aquinas imported Aristotelianism to do it), but "my experience" of a messy, complex world says something different, then Revelation and Tradition get trumped by Experience.

I appreciate the honesty. Just couldn't disagree more.

[cowardm]

I want porn to be ok. Can that be relative too?

[PistisIasis]

I think slaughtering puppies and  small children should be okay...

[lepointe]

So everything is relative? Sounds like uniformatarianism? Bible preaches against that (ROMANS 1) "THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTES" says tony, and I ask "ARE YOU ABSOLUTELY SURE?"