Added: 3 years ago
From: theenergyunderground
Views: 83,525
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (138)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Continued: To see video's of the GEET Fuel Processor here on you tube, Search Paul Pantone GEET. I also like that we don't have to use any electrolyte with the Stanley Meyer Fuel Cell, whereas now; all other HHO systems require Sodium Hydroxide(Lye) or Potasium Hydroxide or a number of other electrolytes. Stanley Meyers water fuel cell also remains ambient temperature(room temperature), rather than getting hot like all other HHO cells, which often operate at approximately 180 degrees Fahrenheit.

  • Continued: When mixed with gasoline which helps the engine to start. Once the GEET engine is warm, the primary fuel is water, which becomes what inventor Paul Pantone calls Plasma, after the orinary water has gone through the GEET reactor. If you could make a video of Paul Pantone's GEET Reactor and explain in the same detail and clear precise process, it would be fantastic. Keep in mind- that even when GEET is not built proper, it still runs on gasoline vapors alone, rather than liquid droplets

  • Thank you very much for making this video :) I've studied Stanley Meyer's "Water Powered Dune Buggy" for quite some time, and your video really explain the heart of the system. I look forward to watching all of your video's. Also- check out the GEET Fuel Processor at GEET International and GEET Friends home pages. When GEET is built proper, and the bubler remains under a vacuum(lowers the boiling point of water), rather than a positive pressure, The GEET will use water as a fuel, when mixed with

  • Learn some science people. This is garbage.

  • If people always used what is "accepted science" (ie. what is printed in the textbooks) we'd still be in caves huddled around campfires. People claiming that anything is BS simply because it is not written about in textbooks are not contributing anything to the discussion. They are only telling people to not look into things.

    Remember, Pasteur was ridiculed and called a quack for a long time by scientists when he proposed his "germ theory" of disease.

    Then there's Copernicus.

  • @SparkyMcBiff

    Do we have any other way than "accepted science" to prove that Stanley Meyers' invention actually works?

    How do we ever know if it works if we can't test it?

    We need accepted science for that.

    We can't run our cars just on people saying that it works...

  • well explained, where's lesson 2, looking forward to it, cheers.

  • What the video says about expanding the water is true, but neglects the energy required to electrolyze the water. Sure, this could work just like an electric powered steam engine. Electricity zaps the water to HHO, HHO changes back to water. Would work fine till the battery ran down. The battery is the energy source, not the water. Stan Meyer was a snake oil salesman. TANSTAAFL

  • @Miata822 Exactly!

  • where can i go to college to study this?

  • @Woody31494 High School physics will do. Go to Thermodynamics in your textbook. Bottom line: Snake Oil, Alchemy, Astrology... people like to believe in things. Some people make money from people too willing to believe.

  • Thanks so much for posting this. It seems a lot like Watchit Technologies fuel reformer. Watchit takes conventional fuel and further cracks it to make more hydrogen available for combustion.

  • Why do people keep trying to resurrect this charlatan's work? He was proven a fraud and died before going to prison, and NOBODY has ever built a water powered engine from his designs or anyone else's.

  • @2012jakjones cant check what you asking at moment but will let you know i would have to watch it again

  • "A water lasing device"....(Picture Dr Evils finger “quotes” when he says “laser”). This guy is just BARELY intelligent enough to be dangerous(to himself, that is). "The resulting detonation will have an implosive characteristic"... priceless drivel!!! I kept expecting him to say, Um, Xfiles is real. Seriously, I've been taken up into the mother ship. Dork!!!!!!

  • @bdetsc I totally agree. 90% of what he said in the video is completely wrong and makes no sense at all.

  • @theenergyunderground

    I am all for making Meyers buggy work, but I have not seen the one that ran on INJECTORS.

    TRUTH is defined by what you can prove, not by what you believe. Posting your beliefs is as useful for splitting water as videos of you walking your dog. The buggy I saw has a resonant chamber and 2 alternators, not counting the battery charging system.

    If he had a working INJECTOR, I have yet to see the Buggy he ran them in.

  • @fsoiberg Look for the video of the buggy with the big VIC control setup mounted in the windscreen.

  • WARING be very BE CARE FULL with higher voltage get expert advice when muliplying batteries

  • sadly this video is counter intelligence

  • Nuclear, wind, sun and hydro plants can be used to charge an array of 12 volt batteries for example 10 small 40 amp hour batterys = 120 volts. at that voltage could use 10 amps to get 4 or 5 liters a minute no need for pwm (but should improve output) no need to remove 500,000,000. combustion engines ,

  • so whats the problem ? building or what ? deciphering ?

  • this is really interesting i haven't read myself into that yet

  • where can i find those images?

    thanks...

  • Piston run on fracturing water? It takes energy to fracture the water into Hyd & Ox. Where did that come from?

    You then say Hyd & Ox will implode ? Mix some in a balloon & see if it implodes.

    The explanation from this video is such nonsense it makes my head spin.

    No energy is gained from splitting water, then later burning it.

    The Meyers car never worked , thats why the courts ordered him to return investors money.

  • What remains of a man just a puzzle and a lot of those unsuccessfully trying to figure out something that one man managed to figure out which is born every 100 years and until 2111 when will be born by chance that it will crush the car on oil

  • If you all understand when will you make a car???

  • yeah stanley...I have respect for his invention but it is a shame he was obviously not bright enough to understand the implications of his invention. This is to every inventor stumbling upon any kind of overunity device: You either shut your mouth and keep it to yourself, OR you put simple to understand plans into torrent and promote it on yt. this is the only other way, dont even think about making money with it, you CANT make money with free energy, believe me or die finding out

  • It is a negatively charged cell, the objective is not HHO, it is an ion/plasma energy created from hole doping (electron removal.) small burst of positive excites the water molecules and ejects electrons from the atoms, the electrons are drawn out of the water by leaving the negative always hooked up,? the positive ions in the battery attract the electrons.

  • where the hell is the doon buggy?

  • The Hydrogen Fracturing Process: The basis of this process is the subjection of the water molecule to very high voltage (20,000+) pulses at a particular frequency and within positively and negatively charged voltage zones at a very low current of less than 1 milliamp.

  • Where normal Faraday type water electrolysis requires the passage of current measured in amps, Meyer's type water electrolysis achieves the same effect in milliamps. Furthermore, ordinary tap water requires the addition of an electrolyte such as sulphuric acid to aid current conduction; Meyer's cell functions at greatest efficiency with pure water.

  • Where normal water electrolysis requires the passage of current measured in amps, Meyer's cell achieves the same effect in milliamps. Furthermore, ordinary tap water requires the addition of an electrolyte such as sulphuric acid to aid current conduction; Meyer's cell functions at greatest efficiency with pure water.

  • In a demonstration made before Professor Michael Laughton, Dean of Engineering at Mary College, London, Admiral Sir Anthony Griffin, a former controller of the British Navy, and Dr Keith Hindley, a UK research chemist. Meyer's cell, developed at the inventor's home in Grove City, Ohio, produced far more hydrogen/oxygen mixture than could have been expected by simple electrolysis.

  • I need to sign & submit the P.O. to subcontract Air Force Amy to support me on this project

  • No offense, but I believe that the fuel that he was talking about was the fact that it could use water of any source: river, rain, fresh distilled, salt water... ect

    He was burning hydrogen and oxygen. The ionized particles could quite possibly be a result of impurities within the fuel source.

  • how or where did you find these drawings?

  • @Iseekoutthetruth Stanley Meyer wrote a book called:

    " The Birth Of New Technology Using Water As Fuel "

    Try searching the title, I found a PDF version on google:

    waterfuelcell. org/phpBB2/download. php?id=816

  • Comment removed

  • really nicely presented video, where's part 1.2?

  • YES< the frequency of the electricity that is "breaking" the water apart is crutial....

  • how can a read the full blue prints and lectures notes of this man's work?

  • John Keely thats all im gonna say... he did this back in the day.

  • seems like everyone is chasing their tails on this one. Too many people trying to change Stans original design. It's almost as if the powers that be are making these changes to throw everyone off. Watch the actual lecture, then visit any of the forums. You will see many changes. Much is missing also.

  • Thanks for your thoughts expressed in your video . Even more energy was extracted from the shear expansion of the water. Energy that was never the less available, and exploited by Stan Meyers. Your vocal abilities are great too.

  • Wonderful... It was simple enough for me to understand and I'm not a scientist or engineer. More please more!

  • i want to download the Stanley Meyers movies related to the fuel injector and i look for the place to do this.

    i use to download from youtube but this seems to be past time now.

    all advice and links are welcome, so are all ideas and visions that can help to replicate and improve this technology

  • the problem with Stan Meyers technology is that it has being fractured into small pieces what gives an unclear picture now, we all want this technology to come onto the marked world wide, so we should join our forces to develop this again and improve it, we can not make the mistake Stan has made, we need to spread this technology over the net so OPEC can not kill the technology again.

    if we do this that way, the politics on energy have to change in our favor.

  • Thanks for breaking this down

  • Test

  • aqui esta

  • Thanks for posting this information.

  • ...well, they've already got laser, maser...I suppose this would be a wazer O_o

    dare I further slow progress....WHAT(which?) ionized gases and non combustible gases exactly? and I thought the water was split in the cell which THEN goes to the engine O_o ok im just confusing myself now...back in the game though, I WILL build a working one of these things if it makes my brain explode. be it by bullet or stress O_o what? I thought you wanted clean fuel gore? no? just carbon tax oh i c...

  • Much obliged. this video really helped me.

  • stan reinvented the steam engine.

    he heats the water to steam almost instantly thus able to inject steam throughout the power stroke.

  • @juggernautxtr no this vid is totally wrong. he had shown how he had to mix impurities into the HHO (browns gas) so that it wouldnt melt the engine. the HHO was made way before the combustion chamber. It was actually made near the water fuel cell itself. There is a vid on here that shows his fuel cell making the gas before having impurities mixed with it.

  • watch?v=azeZgWuHARM&feature=re­lated

  • @slushomatic and what happens at the end of the nozzle?

    a spark ignites the hydrogen and heats water to create steam.

    read the statement idiot.

  • that is helpfull, however you can download all the drawings and scematics etc, but for me, its beyond my ability to try and replicate!

  • @joferg70 yes, same here...but it sure is interesting.

  • Nice video. Now we need to build one.

  • omg nodhear that was stupendous

    i hope i can remember to credit youwith it

    we are un worthy

  • the retarded accidemians and accredited portentious potentates , are just brainwased

    they like to assume they are the most important and most learned, it is a destablization to have some non insider best the scientific religon we know of open system physics like water cycles and nitrogen cycles that provide power for life .

    understanding the cyclic and dynamic frottier

    of green power is best left to amatures with open minds and sound judgement

  • You call it a WASER (water amplification by stimulated emission of radiation). ;)

  • Lol!! Is that from LASER?

    Rolf!!

  • hei! i just want to tell u what i think regarding Meyer, because i have been working on it for years.

    i believed in Meyer. i followed him. but i am pretty sure now that i was fooled.

    i was you years ago. so i know how its like to back up something that you believed in. so let me give you an advice:

    instead of posting videos about Meyer's document to convince people, why don't you replicate his work? if it works, people will believe you. i would believe you. but it has to work =)

  • I have studied this electrolysis for years, yet everyday I still learn something new that i didn't understand before. I am open minded but not gulible. Tom Ogle, charles pogue, Stanley meyer and others who are dead today, paved the  way for others to use energy more efficiantly, without waste without dependancy to have others produce it for them. Point is , anyway you can do that, without polluting, producing carbon or caustic chemicals, is admirable and responsible.

  • I don't know if anyone has noticed but you can get all 3 said gasses from the the water. There is a video that shows Joe running one of his Joe cells an you can clearly see the 3 gasses 1 the noncombustible oxygen 2 unshure but it produces an implosive effect 3 an explosive effect with a yellow flame hydrogen. Find the video it is very long but well worth the time.

  • THANK U

  • This is one of the best videos on the net in regards to S.Meyers technology.

    Would like to add that his device was comparable to a laser in some respects but also looks like any typical welder by using the non-combustible gases to get the reaction he is looking for.

    Another thing to look at is where he is "pulling" electrons from. Which would be the water itself. Have to visualize where the electron flow is going, in direction, in the voltage fields themselves. Electron flow, extraction.

  • Wow...

    "Most of the energy used to drive the piston comes from the fracturing of water into the gas"

    When I heard that the hairs on the back of my neck stood up, and I was hooked on the rest of the video :D

    Thanks a lot for explaining Meyer's documents to those of us lacking the ability to udnerstand them!

  • Breaking water into hydrogen and oxygen consumes an enormous amount of energy (always at least slightly greater than what's produced when you recombine them during the burning process). Every reputable scientist and engineer is well aware of this fact. There is no "free energy" lunch from a chemical reaction.

  • actualy it takes less energy to split water than you recover with standard electrochemistery

    but the rate of gain is less than system losses \.003

    an astute scientist knows there are catylitic reaction that grant us a reprieve from thermodynamic laws by the use of sub atomic

    nuclear forces , our science is not a god its a plan to learn , you cant learn if you have a closed mind

  • That's ridiculous and untrue. Catalysts CAN be used to lower the energy requirements for a reaction, but not to thwart them. Enzymes in your body make reactions easier all the time. They don't reverse entropy, however, and they don't make more energy with each progressive cycle. Also, catalysts don't work at a subatomic level. They function on a molecular level. Thumb me down all you want, the truth isn't determined by a majority vote :p.

  • @NoAntecessor. "reputable scientist and engineer" Fortunatelly for us Nikola Tesla did not graduated. Thanks to god his mind was not slaved

  • The non-combustible gas is meant to slow the combustion speed of hydrogen to equal that of hydrocarbons and/or bring down the combustion temperature in order to retrofit internal combustion engines if I recall correctly from his videos

  • That and I believe the point of ionized gas (from the laser) was to keep the oxy and hydro from recombining, as well as having to use less energy to split the h2o, as the ionized gas would help the electrical field destabilize the h2o by trying to rob its electrons away.

  • don't see the use in inhibition the recombination, the laser was not applied in all the pipes leading to the combustion chamber. On account of applying the laser to the water, it's rather strange since water seems transparent (non-absorbing) to most of the visible wavelengths

  • As for the laser analogy - I don't see an "avalanche effect". Band structure is altered by ionization, and is sometimes conducive to lasing. But ionization and lasing are not the same effect! Also, free energy is theoretically impossible on so many levels. Even beyond conservation of energy...Thermo & statistical Mechanics & even quantum could be brought into this! Physicists do understand that PV work is done when you break up a molecule, and yet the conservation of energy is still true.

  • godamn oil comps

  • Comment removed

  • At the beginning, when you say piston, that is incorrect. you should be saying cylinder, or better yet, combustion chamber, which is the volume inside the engine(in the cyl. head actually) where combustion takes place, vice a hard part like a piston... im not sure if anyone else has already addressed this or not.

  • Much appreciated. I stand corrected. Little bloopers like that have sabotaged the greatest of theories. In the future I will absolutely say combustion chamber at all times. Thank you.

  • clow is just saying he invested to much into OIL, lol, which also isnt the only thing that makes gasoline, gasoline is being made from carbon based garbages now also which is bascially just like water when ya think about it, carbon is in almost anything, get outa oil fast, dump your stuck like hot potatoes, say good night to rockerfellors once and for all! =-)

  • not surprisingly, any opposition to the Meyer scam brings accusations of 'you must work for the gasoline companies'.

    No, but it's the cheapest and easiest form of transportable energy on this earth today.

    Nope, I'm not invested in oil. Even if I was I doubt that convincing people that Meyers was a fraud would make a pennies difference. But I might convince one person to save their life savings and don't be suckered into this scam.

  • LOL, scam.... Not! The problem is the lack of logical deduction of persons investigating the technologies without working with them... In most cases people like you would even find it quite hard to believe that you can get "free" energy from solar panels. Yet Solar panels was worked on initially by Tesla himself although admittedly quite basic. The larger problem involves the fact that most persons lack the imagination to think outside the box itself AKA the already excepted theories.

  • Further still the Law of thermal dynamics that most people concern themselves with does not fully explain the amount of energy that can be released from Water. If you look at the hydrogen bomb what other factors apply.. Also, to further expand this DO you even now how many different states there are of Hydrogen there are... Doubtful. Because if you did you would end your decent and investigate how to make use of it. This goes beyond high school "elementary" science which the uninformed site.

  • UV light ranges are known to dissociate water by themselves, and other compounds as well. In fact they are known to elevate the energy levels in a simple spark of electricity. Combining the input of Light, Sound, and Electricity, and Magnetism is the sum of Meyers and Puharich's work in the water fuel cell uses. Meyer shed the light onto Puharich's work. Pun intended.

  • Yep, you are living in a dream world. Keep wasting time, effort and money on this scam. Some day you will get a V8 moment which involves slapping yourself on the forehead and saying: 'duhhhhh'.

  • @clownjms Some may get a V8 moment; others will get a Nirvarna Moment -- a loaded shotgun barrel placed in mouth, a whacked-out mindset, and an itchy trigger finger

    snif-snif Smells like Teen Spirit

  • @DancingSpiderman,. yes, this is so successful that auto manufacturers not 'held by oil companies' are ignoring it completely. Good luck with that P.O. keep us updated.

  • this 'bs'r' doesn't tell you water in liquid form does not compress.

  • clown, you should listen to robmonty. Tell me, exactly where in my video do I say liquid water compresses?.. and, Thank you so much for regurgitating a science fast-fact from elementary school that has NOTHING to do with this video, because the water in question exists suspended within a mixture of VAPOROUS hydrogen, air, and steam - which absolutely DOES compress! and is NOT liquid water sitting idle within a hydraulic jack. Watch the video again, and this time pay attention.

  • Seeing this again, it makes so much sense and is so simple compared to simply having a proper gasoline/air mixture with proper compression and using intake/outflow valves....

    This takes ordinary water and putting it through a combined mixture of complex voltage waveforms, lasers not yet invented and mixing more elements than a METH lab in an engine that probably is bigger than my house.... (you forgot the most important step "then God appears and a miracle happens")... this might work.

    Not.

  • What a bunch of whooey.... the only seperation Meyer did was to seperate money from sucker investors.

    If you hear someone trying to sell you hho run.

  • what do you think about using the plantone (keet) vortex in conjuntion with the cell? any sugestions? im planning on building a unit to try. oh is this sir hoax? if so thanks for all your videos. great stuff. if not, still great stuff here.

  • I just found a new video on the tube " New Energy-Colorado 1993 ",divided into 10 sections,in which Stan Meyer explained it himself. How in the world there are people calling him a hoax? He has logical thinking.If I understand it, the energy comes from the laser photons, translated into particle energy, and released as thermo energy. The other implication Meyer mentioned in that video is the political problem. Looks like he's been through it.

  • very well put.

  • geet tech is a supearlitive idea

    also there is a adiabatic engine from smokey unik

  • i think you hit it on the head. the question that remains is how do we dulplicate it. i beleive he was using his cell with the spark-injector. i aslo think he used a spark similar to tommy lee's. thats just my thought. i built the cell and spark plug and i am now playing with injectors to introduce hydrogen and water vapors to the combustion chamber just before ijnition. i must say you did a great job.

  • Still not a complete explanation I believe.I agree that it is gas which drives piston, but that gas cannot be a pure mix of hydrogen and oxygen.I think that hydroxy is in minimal value here.HHO maybe ?

  • It's makes sense.I was sure not only the hydrogen explosion moves the piston but with this brilliant and well explained conception this is unbelievable.The missing piece was the water expansion...

    Thank you very much

  • I am waiting for the prototypes and the videos from that as well. Keep his dream alive. It does work but when you got big oil and all the others who were taught the old way, before we started to really understand what science is evolving in to today, you couldn't possibly win and unfortunately Stanley paid the ultimate price. The only way we are gonna see this everywhere is with people like you who take that idea and expand on it.

  • The funny thing is I think you have gotten what stanley was trying to do. Stanley initially produced the tube style electrolyzer to see if his theories on water seperation were correct and to trick the patent office into granting him the patent on such technologies that came about of it. The patents office did in fact give him the patents on such technology and then came the real patent of the spark plug style. Which was his ultimate goal. Keep going you are getting close.

  • Just wanna comment that the drawing of the cylinder/piston/valves are a bit... uncorrect ^^

    Such a wide/short piston would not last long, and there lacks a pin in it for the piston rod, plus (and more important even for a simplified drawing) is the direction of the valves - they simply doesn't go that way but 180° the other way with the camshafts (operating the valves) OUTSIDE of the cylinder ^^ Just my 2 cents again

  • I wonder what the role the laser(prime) plays.You know the laser is created when electrons move from a higher stable energy state(excited) to a lower stable state,releasing energy in the form of photons. Are those laser diodes in the drawings? Do you have a explaination for the laser used? Very interesting explanation.

  • Any info on when you'll be posting part 2?

    thanks for the explanation.

  • man had brains but they killed him. dead in a restaurant and now no one can be as smart. if he was a hoax then he sure did have a good line of bs. this kind of science means the guy was either a genius or a zoid.

  • Thank you so much for sharing that. you should forward this to 526 liters per minute who thinks stan was a fake. I am a firm believer in stans work and hope that one day one of us will achieve what he was able to do

  • It almost makes sense to me.

  • I have my new set up well under construction and soon I will give a video of the different parts. I am working on the plasma system at the moment, which s proving more difficult when I have to use off the shelf parts or make them myself.

  • Mixing air with the hydrogen and oxygen creats an inbalance in the perfect ratios for reforming water and so the resulting explosion does not form an implosion and the temperature rises to create super heated steam forming an ongoing reaction.

  • you got it my friend.

    it is that simple!

  • what I understood is that the power liberated equals E=mc^2, m = mass of missing electrons at ignition.

  • When the gas explodes the water spray also splits and explodes and so you have a continuing on going reaction. Compresed air is fed into the burner tube at an angle to form a helix flow and so mix the water spray, gases and air together so as when the gases explode they do not totally recombine to form water. The burner tube was preheated by injecting propane gas to start the system from cold, once the burner tube was hot the propane was turned off and the burn self sustained on water only.

  • exactly. the trick is getting enough heat out of the gas explosion to split the remaining water. remember HHO burns at about 275F. but normal H2 burns at 4600F. the key is in the ionized and "non-comubustibles", also the compression ratio.

  • You are onto the right track, if you look at my diagram it will show the basic system. I am at present building the second of my engines, all be it on a budget, not as before. I will be changing some of the system due to the cost of especially made parts but I am sure that the end result will be the same. The fuel is a rich gaseos water, the gases are hydrogen and oxygen, when injected in a spray form into a high voltage plasma field the gas explodes.

  • Why did´t anybody try to replicate this thing?

  • Herman Anderson who worked for NASA invented a very similar water fuel system.

  • Wow! Looking forward to part 2.

  • I believe you are correct in all you say....however, I believe a crucial part is missing in your understanding. Stan made hydrogen prior to the water injector plug...in fact he had many series cells. I would encourage you to look up "Atomic Hydrogen Welding"....it is an old method of arc welding...where molecular hydrogen (H2) is passed through a 300v arc...this splits it into atomic hydrogen (2H) when the atomic hydrogen re-associates to molecular hydrogen it releases over 3500 degrees..OU!

  • Zer0PointUnlimited, "Stan made hydrogen prior to the water injector plug..." He did make it in another way before using his injector but after he made the injector, the injector is all that was used for the conversion. He was able to replace spark plugs on any motor and install the injector in their place and then use water to fuel the engine with out using another electrolyzer. I do believe he used pre-energized water but I am not 100% sure as of yet.

  • Nice vid.

    I do have to say, what interested me about Meyer is how very much came from rocketry. electric ISP systems, even special coatings systems.

    Look into MagnetoPlasmaDynamics, Lorentz thrusters.

    This is what Meyers has described here, with net+ water and his resultant ionized oxyhydrogen (from the other hybridized system). Behaving as his conductive fuel.

    I believe 1800 is the calc for steam not fracture?

  • I think the ratio of water to steam is actually 1:2700 !!!!!! But I'm absolutely sure the water:gas ratio is correct.

  • Excellent! The best approach Yet! But please.. post the document or at least a link to it so we can read along with you :-)... And now.. How to put the theory to work.. Any First Steps???

  • I'll have to search for that link. I save so much info it's not easy to keep track of it all!

  • you can try googling for

    Stan_Meyer_Full_Data.pdf

    youll get to the aero2012 site

    i couldn't post the url in here eventhough i tried to give spaces and commas..

  • Very nice work.

  • THIS IS AWSOME. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I have been trying to convince people that Stanley Meyer's was on to something but they have the law of conservation so deeply embedded into their head that they refuse to belive it. This video should change some minds. THANKS agian so muc!!! and keep it up!!! =)

  • Thanks. Your explanation was excellent.

  • i was just getting good at electrolisis(54 aluminum plates) and now i c this. this is so much better. dont change my f!@#$Z% t.v. bradcast methods and give away billions of dollars in cupons. change the way i drive oh mgreat govornment make that digital( who needs cold fusion now?)

  • so your saying he had a egr valve .exhaust gas return valve ? funny these are now in most turbo cars in england.

  • oh this is probably the best explanation on the systen so far! .. super nice of you to do this thanx!

  • Thank you!

    more to come..

  • when, please?

  • very soon

  • @theenergyunderground

    Its been a year. Anything yet?

  • Thans for the uplaod grate work thanks!!!

    pleas keep uplaeding your work. I myself am working may way through his plans and working on a system myself. He explains this in his vidoe and his plans a grate vidoe that i recomend is his water fuel cell international symposium on new enenergy colorado 1993. thanks keep uplaeding plaes its grate stuff!

  • Thanks!

    ...

    The Switzerland video is AWESOME too!

  • I'll tell you the secret. Water does not combust, water is a product of combustion. Two hydrogen and one oxygen molecule happen to form a quite stable molecule that resists further oxidation, requires more energy to 'crack' than the re-combustion or re-oxidation would provide.

    Stan Meyer ran this con for decades. And many others have kept it going. One would think that by now someone would have produced something that actually worked on a large scale.

  • No where in my video do I say that water combusts (further oxidation?) I said that the EXCESS water is fractured via thermal-decomposition, from the heat of the initial hydrogen "detonation". And the whole purpose of the circuit was the destabilization of the water molecule through stimulated emission and ionization. The ionized gas atoms form a high temp plasma which splits the EXCESS H2O providing a second volume increase.

    Keep watching my videos my friend, you'll become a true believer.

  • yeah,stable molecule...but why it is a liquid ? check all other hydrides from this group.

  • why not?

  • newtonian physics and i thought everything was straight then came quantum physics!!!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more