Genital mutilation cannot be justified

[Chadolution]

Genital mutilation "circumcision" of boys and girls must come to a quick and complete end.

[TheTruthMustPrevail]

circumcision is the mark of Lucifer who is the sole authority over the jews. Nobody who displays the mark of Lucifer is allowed to enter Heaven.

[christyvanriper]

Anyone who supports this practice has a severe mental disorder!

[IbnNero]

its easier to achieve vaginal orgasm with no clit!

I support FGM and MGM

[dwynpiper]

@IbnNero Why/how is it easier without a clit? Just genuinely curious, can't speak for myself as I'm not in that position...not eager to be in that position either mind you, but I would feel a tiny bit of peace knowing these women might still have some pleasure.

[marcdaddy33]

As bad as this is...... what about MALE genital mutilation? called, CIRCUMCISION???

THAT is an accepted practice in nearly ALL societies for throughout history. So it's ok to mutilate little boys but not girls??

[BartvG88]

Circumcision is not a form of male mutilation. It does not inhibit sexual pleasure of the man, nor does it make the genitals look less eastheticly pleasing (many people say that it even looks better then uncircumsized ones) Plus, some studies show that a men who have had a circumsision and don't clean themselves often have less chance of diseases than uncircumsized men who don't clean themselves often.

[elaine02270]

All circumcision is mutilation.

[erin23kate]

@BartvG88 Yes, of course it inhibits sexual pleasure - the foreskin contains 20,000+nerve endings. If you asked in communities where FGM is practiced, proponents would say that it has no affect on sex and it "looks better". There have also been studies that show FGM reduces risks of UTIs and STDs when performed by a doctor. There is no good reason to cut healthy, functioning sexual tissue from a child's body. Period.

[BartvG88]

@erin23kate I haven't heard about those studies. But it can't be that bad because you don't hear the billions of men who have been circumsized that they barely feel any pleasure. But I do agree that it is a stupid tradition. Even if it had health benefits, The body still belongs to the child, and no-one has the right to cut anything off it. It should be the choice of the man when he is old enough to decide for himself. Same goes for religion , but that is another story.

[PungiFungi]

@BartvG88 , there are no health benefits to circumcision. Everyone uses this excuse but have yet to bring one convincing benefit that cannot be gain via proper hygiene and responsible sexual behavior.

[dwynpiper]

@marcdaddy33 A person could argue that both forms of circumcision are mutilation and therefore wrong...although I will say that at least boys are done when they are infants and not at an age where they are starting to develop and able to feel the shame and violation that comes with the physical pain. They also don't disable the boys for their future performance and sensation capacity. They don't sew the boys shut either.

[watchyourst3p]

oh man I cant even watch this makes me sick.

poor girls.

[slayerkendra]

there is NO excuse for hurting the female like this!!! Men only loose a peice of skin at circumsion women loose enjoying sex infection pain and possiable death

[archaedemos]

what a dumb f@ckin practice

[silversobe]

Ignorant self destructive traditions that claim feelings of pleasure are a "sin"

-.-