Added: 3 years ago
From: CBS
Views: 19,650
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (413)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • liberals fail big time... it's almost laughable how they fail

  • I'm reading Ann's new book.

  • Kim Kardashian???? Hell No!!! ANNE COULTER !!!!!!

  • sucks to be coulter making millions while you call her stupid. better yet sucks to be palin,mayor governor and making 30 mil a year while you sit at your computer ike a lump and complain.people on the internet myself included should realise opinions only count if you in fact count in the world...go coulter go pain.

  • @ismite123

    I too, am just a lump.

  • I find it so hilarious when people complain about money wasted on the Iraq War. If you cannot accept that it protects us, why is it suddenly an issue to have pointless jobs? I mean, isn't that the whole point of propping up failing industries, to make work. Isn't that why all History students must accept FDR's New Deal ended the Depression, or become Revisionists? Why is it suddenly an issue to the left that Republicans have a make work project, which they believe to actually be useful?

  • @DopeDethrone

    what mess comrade??

    the democrats controlled congress after 2006 and forced banks to make bad "affirmative action" loans which led to the collapse

  • Hey Ann. A big government might work for a big country. Also, I hate the way you say your r's.

  • Still hasn't worked

  • "their voices are not going to be heard anyway". that is priceless!! I agree the wringer dems went through in last nov elections definitely prove conservative voices "are not going to be heard anyway".

    Stick to your guns lady and go down with the ship!

  • seriously? even Ann is giving financial advice now?

  • ann coulter is a cunted cunt

  • She was right. The Stimulus didn't work.

  • president palin...it sends chills down my spine.

  • out of the recession by the end of the year? unless major change occurs in the next month or so coulter is wrong again

  • Stupid conservatives have forgotten that the stimulus package was a republican idea, Sarah Palin promoted it hard in 08. Don't get me wrong the stimulus package was a bad idea but it was a bad republican idea

  • @Toroa28 Stupid Democrats have forgotten that Joe Biden wrote the patriot act they hate so much. They also forget that the stimulus package that Bush signed in was to help solve the problem the Left, more specifically Barney Frank, created in the housing market. You are right though all of the stimulus packages were bad ideas. But wrong about it being a republican idea.

  • an coulter is a cunted cunt

  • @joshw9444 Very original.. did you come up with that yourself? Oh wait, liberals don't think for themselves.... And you can't spell. Just throwin' that out there.

  • Poor little CBS. They posted this hoping to make Republicans look bad. It's after the elections. Fools.

  • What's with all the fucking commercials all of a sudden?

  • Whats wrong with that woman in the black?! DONT ENCOURAGE ANNE COULTER TO RUN FOR OFFICE! The President didnt attack rush limbour. Defending yourself from blatant, spiteful insults without responding in kind is not attacking. And everything Rush and Anne have said here disorts logic . Its was 8 years of republican rule that led to this economic crisis Rush is whining about. And theres nothing 'principled' about bailing out companies to make dividends and invading countries for oil

  • @1982mockingbird1982 "Its was 8 years of republican rule that led to this economic crisis"  That's just factually wrong. I agree with you about the bailouts but now that we've seen Obama poor the cash on them are you still of the same opinion?

  • @equsnarnd But I dont feel it was just the bailouts. I feel they didnt regulate the banks and other big businesses strenously enough so they were free to give loans to anyone and exploit them with high interest rates, executives and directors could take unreasonably high renumeration etc. I feel they did what was in the best interests of the executives and investors who vote for them at the expense of the middle class. I could be wrong tho and Obama hasnt gone in a radiccaly opposite direction

  • @1982mockingbird1982 It's not so much that you're wrong as there is a lot more to the picture in the form of gov't malfeasance. Going back to the Clinton admin the gov't started to put pressure on lending inst to give loans to people who did not qualify. This involved Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, some of the folks who are Obama's advisors, the Federal Reserve all threatening businesses to make these loans. Once the gov't creates a moral hazard all bets are off. Too little room to tell it all.

  • @equsnarnd Well thanx for enlightening me on that, this is stuff I did not no. Personally I dont mind the excessive lending so much bcoz that could have been intended to help needy ppl, but i agree that democrats have made poor fiscal decisions. But its mainly allowing banks to increase interest rates, and allowing executives to recieve high remunerations that I feel was unnessary and was an example of risking the countries future just to increase dividends and remuneration 4 the already rich

  • She rules! I'd cut off my left nut with rusty scissors if she would run for President just to see her debate a liberal.

  • Haha look who's right.. The stimulus failed and everything else Obama has forced down our throats have failed. Start taking note liberals, you guys fail.

  • Is this woman a comic or a commentator or a satirist? I mean, she cannot seriously mean that "liberals" and "liberalism" is the cause of everything that is wrong with the USA. Am I missing something here?

  • @reshie1000 I think she's smart enough to realize that hyperbole and polarizing language sell.

  • The stimulus did not fail its been stated by many ranking economists it did what it was intended to do.

  • @DoctrinaBytes If it was intended to fill the coffers of big corporations and keep unemployment high then it succeeded marvelously.

  • Go Ann you are smarter than that collective assortment of liberal nitwits.

  • Ann and three brain dead liberals

  • @boro66 Ann and three brain dead liberals

    Yah, it wasn't fair. They should have brought in about 3 more libs to make it a bit of a decent fight.

  • Time magazine says that non partisan economists say the stimulus plan was a good thing. I don't know about you, but I trust people who aren't insane.

  • @tjbena86 "Non-partisan economists" probably means Keynesian economists. It's an insane economic theory that demonstrably doesn't work.

  • Comment removed

  • @PissedFechtmeister : Keynesian economic principles are what FDR and Marriner Eccles based their so-called "new deal" which brought an end to the worst economic depression ever and it is no accident that the problems that bedevil America today coincide ever so neatly with the dismantling of those laws, one by one. Don't take my word for it. Look at "the federal companies holding Act", now defunct.The scale of the banking meltdown simply wouldn't have happened if it were still on the books

  • @reshie1000 FDR's policies prolonged and deepened the GD. The current crisis could not have happened without the FED and government creating the moral hazard.

  • How's that hope n' change working out for ya? MMM MMM MMM!!!

  • the stimulus failed

  • @TheArmy19D I wonder if the two women on this show will now eat humble pie and admit that stimulus failed.

  • and liberalism with the republican majority in the white house,senate and house gave us the banking crises,housing crises and unemployment?

  • 4:51 made me laugh my ass off.

  • I like Ann, but she is not an economist! About the stimulus five minute in she says, "There's no way it can work." It's hilarious. Almost spit my food out. The other week I saw her giving military advice!! She must be amazed that nobody is able to stop her.

  • The three mediaites are trying to fry Ann Coulter. This shows that it's all politics=all blithering lies.

    Pray for Our Beloved Country! We need at least three more political parties.

  • Ann Coulter is right. The Republicans cannot go any further to the left or else they might as well just join the other party at this point. That's why you are seeing a strong push to the right in the Republican Party.

  • what does this bitch know. Where is this cow when there is a big govt for eight years. She probably busy eating shit

    At least stimulus was spent in this country. Republicans threw money in desert.

  • Here it is mid 2010 and I think it is safe to say that the stimulas didn't work. Maybe the lady in red jacket should eat some "Humble Pie".

  • @JustFukOffNDie  what didn't work exactly?

  • Love Ann Coulter. She is so great.

  • Ann Coulter is a GREAT lady indeed! A++++++ Go Ann Coulter! A+++++

  • Look this would all be redundant if the government cut spending, ease the tax burden, allow us to increase industries that are languishing under big government and unions. Let private sector make money so we can pay out our debts to China and Japan. It's the only way out. War won't work (who would ally with us against China?) Diplomacy won't work (they don't care about our feelings.) We need to grow our economy so they cant possibly touch us. They are laughing at us right now.

  • People that think Elvis is still alive:7%

    People who think the stimulus package created jobs:6%. That says it all...

  • GO ANN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Give those liberals hell!

  • I agree - GO ANN GO!!!! WOO HOO!!!!

  • SHE IS ONE HOT MAMA

  • U a liberal? ;-)

  • the wsj-foxnews-rushie ECONOMIC FREEFALL neocons is the obstruction politico of NO .. the manson i mean murdoch family (bod & largest shareholder) are led by foreigners mostly from australia & rupert's wife's born in chicom Xuzhou ... meocons CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH so they lie & lie ... remember enron worth $5B one day, zero next day ... meocon ken lay stole the $5 billion ... 2008 another enron except for the country & for $10 trillion missing cash ... join the fox news sponsor boycott

  • the wsj-foxnews-rushie ECONOMIC FREEFALL neocons is the obstruction politico of NO .. the manson i mean murdoch family (bod & largest shareholder) are led by foreigners mostly from australia & rupert's wife's born in chicom Xuzhou ... meocons CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH so they lie & lie ... take business ... the stock market goes up 10% a year ... after 8 bushman reganomic years the market should have doubled but the ECONOMIC FREEFALL market -50% 8 year net ... join the fox news sponsor boycott

  • the wsj-foxnews-rushie ECONOMIC FREEFALL neocons is the obstruction politico of NO ... the manson i mean murdoch family (bod & largest shareholder) are led by foreigners mostly from australia & rupert's wife's born in chicom Xuzhou .. meocons CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH so they lie & lie ... take the bushman's economics ... classic reganomics ... lower & lower taxes ... less & less regulation ... economy going nowhere ... then wham ... it collapsed like 1929 ... join the fox news sponsor boycott

  • the wsj-foxnews-rushie ECONOMIC FREEFALL neocons is the obstruction politico of NO .. the manson i mean murdoch family (bod & largest shareholder) are led by foreigners mostly from australia & rupert's wife's born in chicom Xuzhou ... meocons CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH so they lie & lie ... take the stock market ... sure it soared +75% under obama since march 2009 .. but between 2000 & 2010, mostly meocon years, the market finished down -10%, while china soared ... join the fox news sponsor boycott

  • OBAMA HAD A GOOD REASON FOR THE STIMULUS PACKAGE!!!!!!

    bush never invested our tax dollars in anything... thats why obama is keeping the tax cut but spending the trillion dollars saved up... also bush invested NOTHING into science... FUCKING CONSERVATIVES... nasa hasent got any better since the 1960's!!!!!! when will we land on mars you jesus loving/human hateing fucks?

  • If I recall - Bush sent stimulus money back to the PEOPLE in 2008. What did Obama's so-called 'stimulus' do? He sent it to GOVERNMENT programs.

  • @wildboy789789 So let me get this correct...Obama is keeping the tax cut but spending $ 1 trillion we SAVED UP. ARE YOU SMOKING CRACK? Trillion dollars were borrowed from china, and we haven't had saved money since 1837 when President Andrew Jackson left office and the country debt free. Obama is not spending saved money...he's spending more that the tax revenue is bringing in....thats called deficit spending.

  • if america is in debt... and the african congo is debt free... then why do we drive cars? eat good food? go to good schools? have an all around better life?

    why... ill tell you why... because debt = illusion... if you give me a car and education and food, then ill gladly give my self the title of "debt ridden"... but you basically just made me richer than you... i owe you, but own more of your stuff

    its a trick... but considering the average person cant to algebra im not suprised

  • @wildboy789789 LOL! Well since you don't think we're in debt, Please tell President Obama too stop begging CHINA to buy our Bonds and debt. "If America is in debt" hilarious

  • answer my 2 1-paragraph comments before you spew your nonsensical oppinion

    i gave you 6 "?" in my comments... you gave me 0

  • @wildboy789789 Debt isn't an illusion or trick, it's very real. Eventually there becomes a point when China will own enough debt to make the United States do whatever they want. Max out your credit card bill and don't pay it back and then tell me how long it takes the bank to take everything back and let you keep your debt ridden title.

  • if you dont pay your debt then the government forces you to pay it back... but who forces the usa to pay china?

    chinas only option to get its money back is war or to keep tradeing... and if there is a war and we win then there is no debt to pay back so thats what we are hopeing for

  • @wildboy789789 Who said it has to be a military action to get the money back? China could very easily block trade to the United States and we'd be the ones suffering, especially since they are the ones who have the money.

    Also, the United States probably wouldn't beat China in a war. They have more resources, produce a vast majority of the goods that we use in this country, and have higher IQs than us. You don't want to be in a war against them.

    You need to pay back debt.

  • we are giving china paper money for real resources... and we produce 3x more goods then them (we just consume them all)

    what makes you think china has a higher iq? the literacy rate of females in china is like 48%. in america its well above 70%

    (literacy = ability to take an iq test) in case you didnt know

    also america has lasers on planes that intercept missles... so china needs boats

    and usa spends more on our #1 navy than the next 13 navys COMBINED

    good luck china

  • I hope you know that that "paper money" you are giving them is a commodity that equals a fraction of our monetary standard (i.e., gold). Secondly, you can't use the IQ rate of females because in the world, females usually have less rights to education. Also, China manufacturers more than the US so check your facts.

    You really need to take a basic economics class. Money isn't just paper. The only reason we have paper is because its easier/faster to divide up and count.

  • YOU dont understand economics... think of governments as people with no one to tell them what to do

    if ted pays joe 5$ for an apple then ted gets an apple and joe gets to buy something from ted... but if ted kills joe then ted gets the apple for free

    thats economics when you introduce politics lol

    and why cant you take the iq of females? not educateing your women is a sign of ignorance and that should be accounted for

    the usa sucks... but its still the best... sorry

  • i sucked Ann Coulters dick last night...and i think I liked it.

  • If the U.S. defaults on its debts, its credit suffers. Too much damage to its credit, and It can't borrow money anymore - banks wont lend to countries that don't pay back their debts. The entire economy rests on the country's ability to borrow money. If it can't borrow money, it will whither up and die.

  • the usa has like 10,000,000,000,000$ in debt

    dont you think banks would have stopped loaning us money around 100,000,000,000$?

    we are the fucking usa... we arnt going anywhere fast... the world would be plungged into instant war without the threat of the usa, europe alliance to stop dictators... not to mention italy would be fascist within the year with bersculoni running the show

    the usa is rich and in debt... which is much better than being payed off and poor

  • No, the U.S.A. makes its interest payments. That's all that matters. The debt is allowed to increase by lending banks, because the interest will also increase. The lenders aren't interested in having the principle paid back. Debt is servitude - if you're in someone's debt, you're in their servitude. Wouldn't you like to have a nation as powerful as the U.S. in your servitude? And, as long as there's interest owed on that debt, there's also a steady stream of incoming cash.

  • thats one of the best points ive ever heard

    so we are in no danger... like ive been saying

    our debt doesnt devalue us... it makes us more valueable

  • Well, in some ways, yes. But in more important ways, no. The greater the debt, the greater the reduction in true sovereignty of a nation. No nation that is beholden to an outside power is truly sovereign, obviously. Plus, it's somewhat of a balancing act. Incur too much debt and the whole thing collapses. But, in the eyes of world economic powers, yes - a "healthy" amount of debt makes a country more valuable than a completely debt-free nation - at least, it makes the country more of an asset.

  • The thing to remember is, it's all just a game - it really is. And, like any game, it only works as long as everybody agrees to play along with the established rules. If someone stops playing the game by the rules, the game will likely stop. Except, with this game, if it stops like that, the world is plunged into turmoil and many, many people will die - and nobody wants that.

  • @BloatedSensations The US won't default on its debts because it can always just print up more money. The leads to a devaluation of the dollar, but the banks don't mind because they get the lion's share of the new money. So while the common man is most hurt by inflation, the bankers are relatively better off.

  • @PissedFechtmeister The US doesn't print its own money. It purchases it from a private institution - the Federal Reserve. The Fed is governed by representatives of private member banks who have an interest in not allowing runaway inflation. So, it's not really as easy as just up and printing more money - unless the banking industry happens to think that's a good idea, of course.

  • @BloatedSensations The FED is only semi-private. The US government is responsible for choosing the chairman of the FED. So all it needs to do is choose someone willing to print up money whenever it wants. Someone like Bernanke will do just fine. And why wouldn't the FED want to print up money. The inflation benefits them.

  • @PissedFechtmeister Inflation does not benefit the FED. That's one of the main reasons it was created - to remove from government the ability to print money whenever the need arises. The more money the government prints, the more inflation rises. The higher inflation gets, the less people borrow and the less debt is created. Without a steady creation of new and ever increasing debt, the economy collapses. We operate on a fiat money system - our entire economy is backed by debt.

  • @BloatedSensations The FED stimulates loans by lowering interest rates. The US dollar is worth about 4 cents compared to its value in 1913. If the FED hates inflation then it has a funny way of showing it. By inflating the money supply and giving the bulk of the new money to banks the banks are enriched relative to the rest of us.

  • @PissedFechtmeister The job of the FED is to make sure that the national debt-load continues to steadily increase. Of course, they must ensure that it doesn't increase so quickly that people become spooked, stop borrowing and thus ceasing to incur more debt. But, at their core, their main job is to make sure that the amount of debt in the country continues to climb at a steady pace. They can't achieve that if they allow the printing of money at will.

  • @BloatedSensations Well in that case, oh grand vizir, credit isn't real, nor justice, nor truth, nor honesty, nor intelligence, nor.... I think you are very confused.

  • @equsnarnd Well, credit isn't "real" in the sense I was talking about. Everything else you mention, however, exists independent of humans. Sure, they are conceptual in nature, but they are not human constructs - they are universal constants. If you can't tell the difference, then it doesn't seem that I'm the one that's "very confused".

  • @BloatedSensations Ok, I'll bite. Tell me how justice and honesty exist independently of humans. Explain your metaphysics where justice and honesty are universal constants. BTW, if you say '...isn't "real" in the sense I was talking about."' it implies there is a sense in which it is real. Could you tell me the difference?

  • @equsnarnd Justice is the state of equitableness. Honesty is the state of thruthfullnes. Neither state requires a human awareness of its existence. If we had never discovered either concept, unjust acts would still be unjust. Dishonest acts would still be dishonest - whether we understood them as such or not. If we had never developed the economic system, however, it would be entirely non-existent in any capacity. It is, in its entirety, a human construct. It does not exist independent of us.

  • @BloatedSensations If you believe that I have bridge I'd like to sell you. Justice and Honesty are human constructs. Where would I look for Justice and Honesty on the Moon or in Alpha Centauri? These are conceptual constructs brought about by our relations with one another. Ever heard of Reification of the Concept?

  • @equsnarnd "Justice and Honesty are human constructs" - So, you're saying that if humans had never developed the concept of honesty, it would be an impossibility for me to knowingly relate incorrect information to you? If humans had never developed either concept, would unjust acts still be possible? Would dishonest acts still be possible? If you answer yes, then you must agree that such concepts exist independent of humans. If you answer no, then I'd like you to explain why.

  • @equsnarnd "Where would I look for Justice and Honesty on the Moon or in Alpha Centauri" -- I've never been to Alpha Centauri. It might be teeming with justice and honesty. Do you know that it isn't?

  • @BloatedSensations Another concept for you to consider is what might be termed 'emergent' qualities. That is, they are qualities that emerge from something else. They don't exist in and of themselves, only as a part of another (as in defining characteristic) thing. This would be the state of justice and honesty. They are qualities tied to the characteristics of being humans (possibly animals as well) and don't exist without them. If humans disappear so do these qualities.

  • @equsnarnd Bull. Justice and honesty are universal phenomena existing independent of humans. Only our particular understanding of the concepts are dependent on us. Look - if you say I owe you money, then one of two states must be true in order my indebtedness to you to be true. (1) We both must agree that I owe you money, or (2) you must have some means of imposing your belief that I owe you money upon me. If neither of those two things true, then I don't owe you any money.

  • @BloatedSensations That wasn't the question. It was whether or not these things existed as universal constants quiet apart from being humans ( or sentient creatures) . They emerge as part of what characterizes humans. No humans no,,,

  • Why? Because monetary debt is an entirely fabricated concept that only gains any potency whatsoever when humans agree that it has potency. A concept like honesty is completely and fundamentally different. If you lie to me, then you've engaged in dishonesty. Whether or not you or I understand that you have lied, doesn't matter one iota. You've been dishonest in an entirely objective sense. Humans didn't fabricate the concept of honesty - it's a universal quality that we discovered.

  • @equsnarnd Other animals also have justice and honesty. Social animals thrive because each member of society contributes to the well being of society (through hunting together, grooming each other, etc.). Animals that try to game the system by taking but not contributing are shunned, assaulted, or killed by the rest of society. Liberals are the only animals that think that it's a-okay for certain members of society to take but not contribute. Liberals think they should be financially rewarded.

  • also... if your neighbor doesnt pay you what your owed then the police make him... who is gonna "make" america pay off its debt? NO ONE... we are the world police... so we are basically stealing without causeing a war (till china gets mad) then we kill off china/debt and tell the whole world that china attacked us

    you dont think outside the box too much do you?

  • @wildboy789789 I don't see 6 questions. But I do think outside the box, but I do look at reality. When the current budget say we're $12 trillion in the hold. China holds our debt, but killing off china is a fantasy of yours, thats what you mean about thinking out the box? Police can't make no one pay if they don't have the money they owe you....another LIE.

  • @wildboy789789 American people can hold our elected officials accountable by voting them out if they continue to spend without having a plan to implement a balance budget.

  • then how did bush get off scott free with an illegal war and a 30% approval but stayed in office for 2 terms?

  • @wildboy789789 For your info he won a second term with 52%. Second, his approval ratings went down the last year and half of his presidency.

  • @wildboy789789 The illegal war that Clinton, Biden, Dogan, and many other democrats voted for?.......

  • WELL THEN WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE RUNNING!!!! IS EVERYONE NUTS!?!?!?!

    im moving to paraguay to start my own militia with 300$... then ill become friends with china and let all their spies into my country in return for protection while i create my perfect society by setting up a real democratic socialist state then retireing (letting votes rule) and enjoying my life

    dont critisize me on that... americas founders were a militia too (today called terrorists)

  • @wildboy789789 Ok....lol! You are in your right!

  • @wildboy789789 I won't be critical of your decision

  • It suks

  • Exactly what is a 'legal' war?!?! Give me an example of a legal war. Hussein was not complying with the United Nations that you liberals like to think is so effective. HE was breaking a 'law,' not Bush...Let's face facts, Obama is a worse President than Bush, so far at least.

  • obama is better at funding science than bush was... without science you die

    bush=die

    obama=dont die

    dont die > die

    and therefor

    obama > bush

  • Anne Coulter is right on this point by pure coincidence. she is still an idiot

  • Oh, my God, Ann Coulter is for Palin! Yeah, she's gone off the dep end with Palin!

  • Sure do bitch about the bailouts but first in line in sending your kids to Iraq.

  • Pause it at 1:05....That fucking dumbass smile just pisses me off. Kinda like that scene in "Planes,Traines and Automobiles"..."You can start by wiping that fucking dumbass smile off your rosy fucking cheeks"....God i hate this racist,hate spewing, lying bitch. I just wanna unload 2months worth of load right to her fuckin forehead!!

  • @beaumiller81

    lol

  • Thanks dookie....it took me a while to write that poetry and all i get is a thumbs down by some dumbshit....Seriously though, how evil and hateful is this woman? She should not have a public voice! Its embrassing to say your from the same country as this thing

  • Right, because in your simple and minuscule brain capacity, "racist, hate spewing, lying bitch" is not hate spewing or lying (Ann is racist, how?), but it's poetry (it's cheap). Bravo dummy.

  • sentry000... then we had a depression by the end of the decade.

  • sigh, here's a question.

    I give you a credit card, and you spend 1$.

    how are you gonna decrease that debt?

    Obama solution: SPEND MORE!!!

    now your debt is 10 trillion... what to do hmm...

    Bush Solution: SPEND MORE!!!

    so how are we as americans gonna get rid of this debt if we can't even understand it in terms of a basic credit card with a bank. The federal reserve is just a bank afterall.

  • I wasn't saying that Obama's plan was good I was just stating the obvious. A depression came.

    Yosoydame Micro-economic problems,such as your example of the credit card aren't representative of our Macro-economic problem. There are way more things to consider when you look at a large economy and when done correctly spending can get you out of a recession or a depression. Case-in-point: The Great Depression.

  • whats not to understand about spending less?

    Macro economics and micro economics both won't save you if you're government is constantly spending money it doesn't have.

    Example? Jefferson time, when we were in debt after one of them early revolutionary wars.

    letsee what happened hmm... some guy named Alexander Hamilton knew that debt would be a problem. So he got a 10-15 year plan to solve it.

  • ok your using the great depression which i don't know much about except the meals from the great depression. [ok i know more but i won't go into it]

    Is Obama investing in anything?

    Bush's investments:

    War, green stuff, nice suits for himself [XD]

    Obama's investments:

    war, Green "jobs" that cost 2 jobs for every job it creates, a doggy... and 57 states to show for it.

  • Sir, you must be trolling me. I never said Macro or micro economics would save anything. They can't. They're basically just labels for the different economic models.

    And on Hamilton, he actually was one of the main influences on the American School of economics that believes in investing in infrastructure or government spending for internal improvements. That was actually part of the restoration of America's economy during the great depression.

  • hamilton's first plan of action was getting rid of the american debt though!!!

    lol macro economics micro economics...

    gotta love the

  • oops pressed post accidentally XD

    macro//micro economics.

    i was about to say something about a supply and demand but i forgot now xD...

    better one. Jesus loves you :D

  • Obama Invested in GM, an American car company. And, despite the criticism, saved about 244,500 American jobs.

    While it may seem I'm an advocate of gov't spending I'm not, necessarily. I'm just presenting the facts.

    I don't know what plan of action is the best for America as I am not an economist, but spending and not spending money have, historically, both worked. However, the current situation is so convoluted that you could be gambling when choosing either.

  • 3 gm plants went out of business here in tennessee just this year >.>

    your right though the current situation is like 11trillion dollars of debt? all i gotta say is...

    i didn't sign for it XD

  • Well this is great. We saved teaching jobs! Who pays taxes to support these teaching jobs? Think maybe we could stimulate them as well? This is like getting a loan to pay your mortgage. Fucking frauds.

  • Ann has one good point.

    A stimulus plan will extend the recession into 2012 while doing nothing will end the recession quicker.

    Proof: 1921 there was a massive recession and the government did nothing and it ended quickly, that is why it isn't mentioned like the great depression.

  • big government doesn't work in Cuba thus it won't work in America thus the economic stimulus plan will fail...

    That Ann Coulter is quite the political economist

  • My oh my u are slanted. You fail to mention that her argument included the phrase, "it hasnt worked anywhere else." Her argument is sound, You conveniently left out that key sentence.

  • Hasn't worked anywhere else? You mean Keynesian economic policy? oh yea, you're right... thats never worked in America or anywhere else before... Thank God for Hoover or we may never have gotten out of that depression!

  • Dipshit. We have the strongest economy with one of the smaller governments. #2 Are you trying to fucking say Roosevelt got us out of the depression? Or was it he sacrificed 2500 men at pearl harbor to justify getting us in, AND THATS HOW WE GOT OUT OF THYE DEPRESSION!!

  • the rushie herbert hoover neocons is the obstruction party of NO ... manson i mean meocon family flew a passenger jet into the pentagon on 911 ... check youtube 'mineta 911' ... to darth vader cheney, air force guy - aircraft at 100, 50, 30, 10 miles .. order still stand? .. vader - 'have you heard otherwise' .. airman - 'aircraft has hit the pentagon' ... missiles on the pentagon roof also for stopping other 767's from regan national airport 1 mile away ... support the fox news sponsor boycott

  • the rushie herbert hoover neocons is the obstruction party of NO ... manson family i mean meocon family blew up the wtc towers on 911 ... google 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe' .. mansons say the 500,000 1bs of plastic explosives was installed during wtc construction ... a LIE ... they're not explosives experts ... explosives are inherently unstable & change over time .. dripping pure nitroglycerin .. support the Donny Deutsch boycott

  • You shouldn't huff exhaust fumes before writing in public.

  • Obama is not going to destroy America. America will destroy America if they continue to accuse others of evil and the truth behind the agenda........ Shut up.... cause your just adding to the promblems

  • the rushie Great Depression neocons is the obstruction party of NO .. the neocons are mind controlled mega ditto heads ... the manson family i mean meocon family lie about nearly everything ... death panels ... hehe ... the presidential school speech will be marxist ... hehe ... forget about 911, no way ... people died leaping from the 100th floor while on fire ... the secretary burned alive on the phone screaming ... hard to forget ... & the mansons did it ... support the Donny Deutsch boycott

  • the rushie Great Depression neocons is the obstruction party of NO .. the neocons are mind controlled mega ditto heads ... the manson family i mean meocon family continue to talk the economy down ... while the stock market continues to soar ... already passing the highs of november of last year ... & climbing faster that it was falling when the manson family ran the economy ... which was a fall comparable to the one it 1929 ... the mansons tell you over and over again the stimulus isn't working

  • I agree the Republicans are the party of NO. Kind of like the evil, right-wing founding fathers who based the entire bill of rights on the word NO. It is time to realize that what we need is a bigger and more instrusive government that says "YES." That will tell us what to do and make decisions for us. Thank God the Democrats control things.

  • I am glad the republicans have the intelligence to say NO to Obama's lunacy. Obama is promoting a dangerous, evil agenda that will only destroy America. Obama has not one positive idea. Everything Obama believes, supports, and proposes is wrong. So blocking Obama's damage to America is the highest form of public service. Praise God the republicans are protecting America when the democrats won't.

  • oh god i would never follow this coultergiest demon anywhere let alone to the bathroom. all she is a media attention starved assclown!

  • i wish i rememberd what i wrote. but one side can never because we'll either be pussy or assholes. but why does our economy tank when republicans are in office.

  • Democrats plans do not take immediate effect. Its a perfect way to set the competition up for failure by sticking your foot out before they line up to the political table.

  • competition?

    i thought we all are americans?

  • Liberalism and government is the problem. Case in point: Our housing crisis can be traced back to FNMA, a government sponsored loan agency. Controlled by a few; Franklin James, Gorelick and Johnson, all that power and money was too much to resist. All made millions in bonuses at the expense of the economy. Of course NBC won't connect the dots, They wouldn't dare.