My car can get 110 MPG. It has an 850cc engine which puts 39bhp on the rear wheels, it weighs 350kg because the body is fibreglass and the car is smaller than a Fiat 500 AND I have to drive with fuel economy as my only goal. To get a high MPG put a efficient, small engine to a car which is light.
My Diesel Ram 3/4 ton truck already get 21 MPG not towing and 17.5 towing a 5000lb trailer around town. My Hemi truck got.....A LOT less. Diesel motors would certainly be the easiest way to get all cars to increase mileage. Just start putting diesel engines in them. Bus's, trucks and trains are all diesel for a reason.
@MrDarinWarren Diesel is nothing compared to gas. It gets half the horsepower and a lot less RPM range cause it has restrictions. The torque is the same when comparing same size bore and stroke diesel and gas engines. The only reason diesel gas good gas mileage is it has long stroke so the torque is lower RPM. Gas engines do that too, a mini version is the 1.9L escort engine. 23 city and 31 highway. sure it lacks today's technology to boost it even higher but it can be better.
@isomgmsghs Really? I find that it's best not to speak in on a subject you know nothing about. Do a little research junior. Diesel kicks gasoline's ass. Use your brain. If gasoline had higher HP AND is cheaper wouldn't all the 18 wheelers be using it? Diesel has higher HP and Torque as well as a higher flashpoint which makes it ideal for low ranged engines which last longer than high range.
Stupid fuck - I get 44mpg on the highway normally aspirated. No bull shit HHO hoax crap either. Bet you want to know how. Anyone who buys this shit should be using their money to start the fire in their BBQ.
lol. Oil companies are shitting themselves right about now. I met a guy whose chevy pick up got 10 miles to the gallon on the highway and did the same thing to his. He's now getting twenty + miles to the gallon.
Look up conservation of energy. These systems don't work because they are using petrol converted to electrical energy via the alternator to create HHO. The efficiency of an alternator decreases with increased amperage, in other words the more current that is drawn the harder it is to turn the alternator pulley resulting in more petrol being consumed. It would only work with an external power source like solar PV, but that is not practical and or cost effective.
There are couple things to realize when using HHO. The first law of Thermodynamics is correct. As far as an alternator goes, any alternator in its standard use it not in charge mode all the time, so it can be made to work more. Another apsect is this and its very simple, there is potential energy in water, in the form of 2 H and 1 O. Using HHO is converting the Potential energy into Kenetic Energy. HHO is not perpetual, there is a loss, be no one who uses HHO is MAKING H2O. It is being consumed.
and most of the debunkers out there have never even built a generator and experimented with the gas. The gas has some interesting properties and I have learned it can not only melt metals such as aluminum and steel, it "vaporizes" the metals into nothingness. HHO has so many other realms it could be used in. We can get rid of or vaporize all this junk we have made over the years.
I have been studying hho production for a couple of years now and if their is one thing I have learned is that the gas helps to produce a "complete and clean" burn.
The hho gas just helps the gasoline burn complete and clean, thus increasing how far you can stretch the gasoline. Another thing people don't really take note of is the reduced emissions out the tailpipe. This means that the injection is indeed working.
Just think of here in Europe, my 2001 Ford Mondeo Wagon (size like the American Ford Contour) Turbo Diesel has a 40 mpg. A gallon of Diesel is here 6,55 US$!
these are good cars we had one just like this it got 35mpg i think something like that we ran it till 305k miles and sold it good car drove it for 10 years with no problem they are a little slow going up hills i think we could go about 45mph up a hill it was a 5 speed with a overdrive they are made cheap but run forever wish we still had it would fix it up
The measurement is laughable, at best. As you drive, the fuel in the tank heats up and the volume (gallons) changes. The heat in the tank, and vehicle motion, also creates fuel vapour in the tank. The vapours resist the flow of fuel into the tank and will cause the nozzle to shut-off prematurely (simulating a filled tank). Also, fuel flow out of the nozzle (regulated by how hard you squeeze the handle) can cause the nozzle to shut-off before the tank is anywhere near full.
@ZWILD1 The only accurate way to measure fuel consumption is by weight. Drive to weigh scales, measure each axle separately and record the fuel temperature inside the tank and the true odometer reading . Drive a distance sufficient to use at least half a tank. Return to the same weigh scales and make the same measurements. Calculate the volume used by taking the start weights and tank temp - the end weights and tank temp. That will get you a good ballpark" figure.
@ZWILD1 Not saying the poster is dishonest but, how do we know that no fuel was added off-camera, the odometer wasn't manipulated or even that the 'before' and 'after' occurred on the same day? For such a fantastic claim, I'll need to see much better verification before I believe any of it.
@ZWILD1 Might I suggest that you build a unit similar to his and try it out in a similar car. If you think it's fraud then attempt to replicate. If you remember back in the 80s with the claim of cold fusion being solved, researchers were unable to replicate the results and declared the initial finding to be flawed. Test, don't be testy.
@GarrettKeetley $5,000.00 In parts? Divided by $3.00 per Gal. equals to aprox. 1,666 USG At 60 MPG equals aprox. 99,960 Miles VS. $5,000.00 / $3.00 per Gal. = aprox 1,666 USG at 65 mpg = to 108,290 miles
Are you telling me that you paying $5000 USD for just 8,330 miles difference?
Surelly not a good investment. I do own a TDI Beetle.
Why not disconnect the normal fuel system and just hook up a one gallon can of gas by hose to the fuel rail? Gravity can do the job of the fuel pump. There could be no doubt of the mpgs then.
@Thinkify1 Do you know what you are talking about? This car is fuel injected, it needs fuel preassure. Be sides If the car tank is filled to the very top; "i dont see why it shoud be a non accurate measure. Whatever the engine sucked from the tank and then refilled WILL give you the exact fuel comsumed.
@wertyh11 Actually I do know what I am talking about. I worked ten years in a dyno room at roush. An engine can function by a gravity fed system, no fuel pump required. I have no doubt that the HHO system works. It's not that big of a deal to pop a fuel line at the fuel rail. Get a 1L resevoir container and hang it from the rear coat hangers in the back seat. Connect the jug to the fuel rail with tubing (7ft). As long as you're not driving uphill, you should be ok. I just want the data.
We just were too cheap to put in a chip for the oxygen sensors. If the exhaust burns cleaner, the computer adds gas. The Hydrogen was not there for the engine to run on as an extra fuel. Instead it allows more of the gas to be combusted that is already being used. Gasoline engines are VERY inefficient and to burn wasted gasoline will help provide power. Just my opinions, Fancy energy equations or not, what works works. But it is hard to miscalculate 60 mpg for a year, come on.
I say it is possible. I have had two escorts of the same vintage with high miles and consistently got 37-39 mpg. If it actually WORKS for someone, why not try to find out how they do it, instead of telling them the world is flat? Personally, the hho did not work for me. I had a huge old Pontiac with a 5.0 liter engine, and nothing changed. But with that size car, I'm not surprised. Now on a 98 Jeep, it DID decrease the mileage. But, that is not proof that it didn't work.
Diesel is the way to go for economy and power. Forget these silly hydrogen generators, they take a huge amount of power and use more fuel for no effect. How did you adjust your ECU to accomodate the hydrogen input and reduce petrol injection in proportion? Unless you did that it's pointless. Your figures are wrong, that car will give you 30mpg. I agree about not buying hybrid, but don't be conned by companies selling hydrogen kits, they are really conning people - really silly people!
@urbex2007 Speaking about the economy, diesel isn't clean enough to even use a cat converter, they will burn it up as fast as a gas engine missing out. When they burn as completely as gasoline and omit no soot, they will then be good for the economy.
well what can i say i have been trying to get it to work on my car for 6 months and i have now come to it that it does not work and i am putting up a challenge to anyone who nos about it to get my car to do more than 35 mpg on hho so i would like to be proven wrong it may work on the bench but not in a car so prove me wrong
These skeptics crack me the hell up. Im in the process of an installation myself. I made a very crude hydrogen generator and Ill tell you, 1 small bulb will produce a pretty big bang. I was very impressed with the simplicity. Americans can be so naive. You guys can blow your money on gas tax. I'll be spend mine on something useful.
I had bought an 83 Ford truck many years ago with a small HO version. One cylinder had a hole in the piston. Not that it caused the problem, but it does make me think it had.
It was a small glass bottle like a mason jar and it had a spiral coil. While ignition on, it was ' as if ' boiling. It smelled, I disconnected it and took it off, the glass jar broke and I don't know where it went.
I had lived in Wisconsin back then and Red Forman now comes to mind saying; " dumbass! " :
"HHO" is a HHOax. These silly things take more energy from the crankshaft than they return. They will REDUCE fuel economy, but will NEVER increase it! Not unless you can find a 100% efficient alternator belt, 100% efficient alternator, 100% efficient electrolyser and a 100% efficient internal combustion engine, "HHO" systems won't do so much as break even. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says 'no free lunch!'
Why anyone would fight against these devices is beyond me. We obviously need better energy sources. This is obviously a viable fuel. Though it is incorrect, I will further debunk your claim. Use a solar panel to charge additional batteries. OR find any number of ways to produce the electricity. .......and you have no argument.
@revolxaohemwolb Very closed minded. Im using it in my car and have increased it from 40-45mpgs to 55-63 mpgs. It runs smoother and has more power. Try it on your car and tell me that it doesn't work
@revolxaohemwolb it doesnt work like that... a gas engine isnt 100% efficient either... they hydrogen just aids in burning the fuel in the engine, instead of burning that fuel in the cats.... and actually youre alternator is always creating un-needed energy and it is just wasted, and that is all that is required to run this...
@revolxaohemwolb Critics of HHO technology that invoke the first law of thermodynamics usually do so saying, that there is no such thing as a perpetual motion machine. What the critics fail to recognize however, is that HHO is a fuel additive, so no one is talking about a perpetual motion machine. Car owners are looking towards aftermarket HHO generators to supplement the fuel on their gasoline-powered cars (or diesel-powered). stfu
@revolxaohemwolb It isn't taking much from the crankshaft bud, its taking it from the battery, i realize the alternator is powered by the serpentine belt but it isn't working that hard. Plus you are introducing a secondary fuel source, Hydrogen, and an oxidizer, oxygen, thus oxidizing all the hydrogen AND gasoline creating a complete burn. Where you gain is burning fuel that would otherwise be unspent and burned in the catalytic converter.
@revolxaohemwolb u ignorant cocksucker! look at all the results on here!!! Go look it up. the alternator makes 20 amps of power whether your taking that power and using it or not!! HHO generator uses between 10 and 20, so ur not affecting the milage at all in a negative way! Now look at the 10-100 percent increase in gas milage that people are getting and tell me that they dont work!
@revolxaohemwolb Please explain how they take up more energy than they return. Because if you don't have a good enough explanation on why it wouldn't work, a lot of people will just think you work for an oil company.
@revolxaohemwolb its an oxidizer and helps the fuel burn more efficienty. its a catalyst, so it speeds up the combustion process, so therefore all fuel is burnt inside the engine... not spit out and burnt in the catalytic converters.... gasoline engines on average are about 20% efficient, and this just helps it burn that other few percent
Perhaps putting this "kit" on a easy to do list so others can prove this is true & real. Then spell out the costs and all the things to consider this.
60 Miles per gallon is a very big number to produce. It figures to about 33% increase in MPG.
Who would not want 33% fuel efficientcy increase no a days?
I wonder why its a multi billion dollar scientific research about fuel cells when people like you have already solved the problem!!! WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN HIDING???
My 98 Escort Sedan gets approx 34 in town and 39 on the highway. 60 miles per gallon is not double that. I would like to get this kit and install it on mine!
I'd like to see you run the car dry and then add precisely 10 gallons of gas into the tank (measured by weight). Then go on a trip at 60 mph on cruise control. Then you will know what mpg you really get.
@Umaxen Your comment lacks of logic. The tank was filled to the max. and was refilled to the MAX. after the milage. How in the world is this guy is going to know if the tank on the car is back filled to the TEN gallon mark after the milage run? Is it not smarter the way he did the test than what you are suggesting? Kind of stupid is it not?
@Umaxen Road conditions: I like to know what will this same test tells me if the U tuber fill the tank at the same gasoline station and go's back home.
@Umaxen Even easier fill the tank full, use the specs to find the capacity and drive till the light comes on, fill up to the brim calculate fuel spent vs distance traveled.
lol... your method of measuring fuel economy is flawed. 32 miles of driving cannot indicated overal driving situations. but even more important, you need to drive far enough to consume most of the fuel in the tank so that you minimize the error that occurs by not being able to top up the tank to the EXACT level of fullness that you did during the first fill. the error can skew the results in either direction. filling the tank more full would lower mpg: under filling would raise mpg.
I don't know how it works.. but I have one on my car too, and it's increased my mileage by 30% in the first 2 weeks of driving it... still waiting to see if it gets better :)
This is hardly scientific, there are many hyper miler techniques which would yield the same result. EPA economy tests would have the car run on a closed course at least one run several laps each direction and an average MPG based on actual fuel useage. You also are careful to not show if the car is manual or automatic. Way too much deception going on here.
60mpg? That's not difficult at all. One example: european ford escort with the 1.8l diesel. That will give you a good 60mpg without installing any dubious scam devices.
1 Imperial gallon= 1.2 US gallon. Therefore 60mpg would equate to 50mpg in US gallons. This on a rather old engine. Modern diesels can be even more efficient
im curious as to where to plumb this into a turbo vehicle that has a maf sensor setup.. if it would be ok to inject it where the air filter is, it would be measured by the maf sensor, then run thru the hot turbo, the intercooler to the throttle body. Would the hot turbo be trouble to potentially ignite the hydrogen?
Use an inefficient alternator (80% efficient) to generate electricity using mechanical energy from the engine. Then use the electricity to generate hydrogen and oxygen (40% efficient). Then burn the hydrogen and oxygen in the engine (40% efficient). So the engine will make 12.8% what the alternator consumes.
This technology is effectively a 12.8% efficient battery.
you are wrong and you don't know why. why doesn't every car do this if it is so easy and cheap to more than double the efficiency of the car? do you think there is a conspiracy?
I think it is impractical to implement into production with the liability myself. It will be one more thing consumers have to worry about, plus I have seen videos of some exploding while in the car. But really am skeptical as well, but I have an open mind. I think if it can do something with the extra juice, then why not. Just dont know.
"I have seen videos of some exploding while in the car"
Really?
Can you list the titles of these vids cause I havent seen any.
BTW I am curious too, thats why I am testing out this hydroxy stuff - to see for myself whether it works or not. My first cell gave me a 14.63% increase in mpg. I am not 100% sold on hydroxy, but the test results are encouraging to say the least.
Anyway dont forget to list the titles of these 'exploding while in car' vids.
no conspiracy but if u owned a company would u make a product that takes away ur profits?
no
Big auto & big oil have been hand in hand for years. If they made a car that ran on water or partly on h2o, that would break both big auto & oil.
But what about pure hydrogen cars they make?
Easy, that is a product they can produce & sell - its a replacement for gasoline; just another profit stream. By focusing on pure hydrogen, big auto & oil will have profits for another 100+ yrs.
The bmw car runs on hydrogen that has already been produced at a plant that is the only way a car can run on hydrogen. These systems don't work simple physics tells us why and the electrolytes won't make a huge difference.
the bmw you are refering to has double the carbon footprint of conventionally fueled cars of similar size and performance. why? because the electricity used to product the hydrogen in that plant that you speak of is generated by burning COAL. this is a major drawback of hybrid and electric cars also. FYI
Our 95 escort wagon gets 35 mpg stock.We are working on adding an hho generator. I assume smaller cars don't need as much HHO. How many LPM of HHO is your output? What kind of set up are you using in your generator?
I have an escort wagon of the same vintage. I took it on a 302 mile trip in Michigan and got 39.5 MPG, all while hauling a 17' sea kayak on top and a whole bunch of camping gear. You don't need pvc pipes full of water under your hood to get good mileage, you just need a well maintained mid nineties 4 cyl. and good driving habits. I really mean the mid nineties stuff. I had a 2004 Focus and it could get 30-31 at the absolute best w/o the boat on top.
We need to start drilling for oil offshore now, because the sooner we do, the sooner we will have more domestic oil. There are more than 250,000,000 registered vehicles in the United States. These gas burners aren't going away overnight. They will have to be phased out over not years, but decades. Let's go for alternative fuels, but let's be realistic about the time frame! High fuel prices hit the poor, elderly and middle class the hardest! Cancel your vacation Congress and act now!
We need to start drilling for oil offshore now, because the sooner we do, the sooner we will have more domestic oil. There are more than 250,000,000 registered vehicles in the United States. These gas burners aren't going away overnight. They will have to be phased out over not years, but decades. Let's go for alternative fuels, but let's be realistic about the time frame! High fuel prices hit the poor, elderly and middle class the hardest! Cancel your vacation Congress and act now!
Not sure what you mean... "60 MPG Escort Wagon" is all I see. I'm not doubting your figures, I am just saying you should do more testing in a way that would show a more accurate count. This would entail running longer or metering the fuel accurately say perhaps by installing a one gallon tank to run from. Now I am not sure if you have a fuel pump in your tank or machanical on the engine. Of course the mechanical pump would be easier to do the test with.
Too short a trip to measure mileage. Gas expands as it warms up, and if your engine returns fuel to the gas tank, it will raise the temperature several degrees, so it will appear to have used less than it really did. Always! Drive it for 2-3 tankfulls before you can average the mpg.
Interesting.... I Can get 60MPG out my Peugeot 306 TD HDI (UK) as standard, cost where ever I can and can push it to 65. A 4 Litre Gallon costs about $10 though :( but compare that to most 15mpg US gas guzzlers and were well better off!
green96gt... geniuses are not amusing or outspoken people... just look at Einstein. If your looking for someone who is outspoken and entertaining then listen to the village idiot... AKA you.
I'm Canadian.....rescue me from what? paying higher than US gas prices? while we fight the real battle in Afganistan, while you have your thumb up your ass in Iraq. And don't get me started how your weak ass dollar is driving ours through the roof. Please we don't need your help, you've done enough already. LOL
whether or not we were a country at the time dosen't change the outcome. The same people lived here before and after confederation just weren't called Canadians yet :P
What? 32 miles? You've got to be kidding me! It took you more time to post this video than it did to perform your very 'scientific test.' I think you single handedly set the credibility of HHO gas powered vehicles back ten years. Dork!
You have got to be kidding me. A 32 mile test? Come on...how do you know you topped off the tank to the exact same level both times? On a short trip like that, a tenth of a gallon makes a big difference. That road test is absolutely meaningless. Get back to me when the trip odometer reads 200 plus miles.
Say what? Have you never put gas in a car before? You know how it shuts off...but then you can put in a little more and a little more? After the first shut off, you can get in another gallon of gas at most pumps.
when do you think youll be able to market a reliable product? or at least make a video of instructions for us to make our own? this is very good for the environment as well as all of our wallets.
also, i dont know if you saw them, the "power tubes" that another guy is showing on youtube, do you know if his model works and even compares to your steup? i feel that you know whats going om with all your modifications and things.
ok i have a question, after hho burns, it goes back to water, isn't that bad for the engine? what about the cat and exhaust? not trying to be a negative nelly, i just want to know b4 i put it on my car :-)
No not exaclty .thats like saying if you burn gas it turns back to gas in the exhaust. If your scared about water in the Intake just use a gas line dryer like on a air compressor> think its just called a water separater. I have had 0 problems and Steam doesnt hurt the engine it will help clean out carbon. My throttle body on my van looks brand new but i keep a eye on everything.
dude i dont think it gets 60 mpg but it diffently gets more than normal which is awsome i have a 97 escort (non wagon) and we have put in one of those HHo gens and it gets about 35 mpg now which is about 14 more than originaly and it has a new 180 something horse power engine replacement
Boy i wish gas was 3.08 per gallon right now...sad
smiley1612 4 months ago
ok what else do you add to the water electrolyte and what else
slickdickdafoola 5 months ago
where can the plans be found to replicate this system?
DavidJNowak 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My car can get 110 MPG. It has an 850cc engine which puts 39bhp on the rear wheels, it weighs 350kg because the body is fibreglass and the car is smaller than a Fiat 500 AND I have to drive with fuel economy as my only goal. To get a high MPG put a efficient, small engine to a car which is light.
Capitanvolume 5 months ago
how do you get the injectors to calibrate for the added HHO? is there a way to adjust the MAF or MAV? I would like to try a system on my Miata.
kenzo5716 5 months ago
My Diesel Ram 3/4 ton truck already get 21 MPG not towing and 17.5 towing a 5000lb trailer around town. My Hemi truck got.....A LOT less. Diesel motors would certainly be the easiest way to get all cars to increase mileage. Just start putting diesel engines in them. Bus's, trucks and trains are all diesel for a reason.
MrDarinWarren 6 months ago
@MrDarinWarren Diesel is nothing compared to gas. It gets half the horsepower and a lot less RPM range cause it has restrictions. The torque is the same when comparing same size bore and stroke diesel and gas engines. The only reason diesel gas good gas mileage is it has long stroke so the torque is lower RPM. Gas engines do that too, a mini version is the 1.9L escort engine. 23 city and 31 highway. sure it lacks today's technology to boost it even higher but it can be better.
isomgmsghs 2 months ago
@isomgmsghs Really? I find that it's best not to speak in on a subject you know nothing about. Do a little research junior. Diesel kicks gasoline's ass. Use your brain. If gasoline had higher HP AND is cheaper wouldn't all the 18 wheelers be using it? Diesel has higher HP and Torque as well as a higher flashpoint which makes it ideal for low ranged engines which last longer than high range.
mattdidit84 2 months ago
Are you still driving a car with HHO? Thanks for sharing ;-)
DirkME1022 7 months ago
Stupid fuck - I get 44mpg on the highway normally aspirated. No bull shit HHO hoax crap either. Bet you want to know how. Anyone who buys this shit should be using their money to start the fire in their BBQ.
isegoria1 7 months ago
OMG $3.08 PER GALLON!!!!
smiley1612 7 months ago
its true i know 2 dudes with this set up getting 25 mpg on full size v8 fords
andreavanpatten 8 months ago
its true i know 2 dudes with this set up getting 25 mpg on full size v8 fords
andreavanpatten 8 months ago
lol. Oil companies are shitting themselves right about now. I met a guy whose chevy pick up got 10 miles to the gallon on the highway and did the same thing to his. He's now getting twenty + miles to the gallon.
knrwingnut 8 months ago
@knrwingnut True, Same here. My old 89 ford with a EFI 351 got about 9-10 mpg and I doubled mine with my old electrolyzer.
Phantasm911 5 months ago
Look up conservation of energy. These systems don't work because they are using petrol converted to electrical energy via the alternator to create HHO. The efficiency of an alternator decreases with increased amperage, in other words the more current that is drawn the harder it is to turn the alternator pulley resulting in more petrol being consumed. It would only work with an external power source like solar PV, but that is not practical and or cost effective.
TheDemoclesSword 9 months ago
Well I like the set up. If you made a bolt on kit I would buy it from you and put it on my escort. Thanks.
mikebtte 9 months ago
There are couple things to realize when using HHO. The first law of Thermodynamics is correct. As far as an alternator goes, any alternator in its standard use it not in charge mode all the time, so it can be made to work more. Another apsect is this and its very simple, there is potential energy in water, in the form of 2 H and 1 O. Using HHO is converting the Potential energy into Kenetic Energy. HHO is not perpetual, there is a loss, be no one who uses HHO is MAKING H2O. It is being consumed.
micahlt1 9 months ago
and most of the debunkers out there have never even built a generator and experimented with the gas. The gas has some interesting properties and I have learned it can not only melt metals such as aluminum and steel, it "vaporizes" the metals into nothingness. HHO has so many other realms it could be used in. We can get rid of or vaporize all this junk we have made over the years.
jdcproducts 9 months ago
I have been studying hho production for a couple of years now and if their is one thing I have learned is that the gas helps to produce a "complete and clean" burn.
The hho gas just helps the gasoline burn complete and clean, thus increasing how far you can stretch the gasoline. Another thing people don't really take note of is the reduced emissions out the tailpipe. This means that the injection is indeed working.
jdcproducts 9 months ago
Good clip :)
stobor4 9 months ago
no where in this video does it actually prove you drove to michigan and got 60mpg
so my question is what the hell did you do to your car and why does everyone believe you?
ttpmvo 10 months ago
the law of thermodynamics? The theory of evolution violates that law yet lots of people still believe in evolution.
catshazam 10 months ago
@catshazam I was thinking the exact same thing when I read your comment. Well said.
7zarc7 9 months ago
wow 4.39 a pack for marlboros. around here they're like $11 lol
KrankieV2 11 months ago
@KrankieV2 $11? around here they're $5.19 lol
CountyFarm1 9 months ago
@CountyFarm1 yep... all taxes here
KrankieV2 9 months ago
I want to make my Escort like yours. Do you have instructions and a parts list for this set up?
turbobuick33 11 months ago
i get 15 mpg with my race car is300 =c
smallblocksupercharg 1 year ago
Just think of here in Europe, my 2001 Ford Mondeo Wagon (size like the American Ford Contour) Turbo Diesel has a 40 mpg. A gallon of Diesel is here 6,55 US$!
1,30€ per litre.
Regular Gas/Petrol is at 1,48€ per litre.
Thats 7,50 US$ per gallon!
But i must say, that we have got 82% Tax on Fuel.
skydog885 1 year ago
these are good cars we had one just like this it got 35mpg i think something like that we ran it till 305k miles and sold it good car drove it for 10 years with no problem they are a little slow going up hills i think we could go about 45mph up a hill it was a 5 speed with a overdrive they are made cheap but run forever wish we still had it would fix it up
brian93ist 1 year ago
mythbusters tested all these and none of them work, its all driving style and condtions
beachbummm69 1 year ago
What kind of generator are you using? Do you have a video of the construction of the video?
bobpickettsr1 1 year ago
Comment removed
frogvillage 1 year ago
The measurement is laughable, at best. As you drive, the fuel in the tank heats up and the volume (gallons) changes. The heat in the tank, and vehicle motion, also creates fuel vapour in the tank. The vapours resist the flow of fuel into the tank and will cause the nozzle to shut-off prematurely (simulating a filled tank). Also, fuel flow out of the nozzle (regulated by how hard you squeeze the handle) can cause the nozzle to shut-off before the tank is anywhere near full.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@ZWILD1 The only accurate way to measure fuel consumption is by weight. Drive to weigh scales, measure each axle separately and record the fuel temperature inside the tank and the true odometer reading . Drive a distance sufficient to use at least half a tank. Return to the same weigh scales and make the same measurements. Calculate the volume used by taking the start weights and tank temp - the end weights and tank temp. That will get you a good ballpark" figure.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@ZWILD1 Not saying the poster is dishonest but, how do we know that no fuel was added off-camera, the odometer wasn't manipulated or even that the 'before' and 'after' occurred on the same day? For such a fantastic claim, I'll need to see much better verification before I believe any of it.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@ZWILD1 Might I suggest that you build a unit similar to his and try it out in a similar car. If you think it's fraud then attempt to replicate. If you remember back in the 80s with the claim of cold fusion being solved, researchers were unable to replicate the results and declared the initial finding to be flawed. Test, don't be testy.
bobpickettsr1 1 year ago
@GarrettKeetley I think you are paying like One Dollar sixty six cents PER MILE.
That is really Incredible, you have the most ineficient VW TDI in the world.
wertyh11 1 year ago
@GarrettKeetley $5,000.00 In parts? Divided by $3.00 per Gal. equals to aprox. 1,666 USG At 60 MPG equals aprox. 99,960 Miles VS. $5,000.00 / $3.00 per Gal. = aprox 1,666 USG at 65 mpg = to 108,290 miles
Are you telling me that you paying $5000 USD for just 8,330 miles difference?
Surelly not a good investment. I do own a TDI Beetle.
wertyh11 1 year ago
@GarrettKeetley Must be a really long down hill in India i bet.
wertyh11 1 year ago
Why not disconnect the normal fuel system and just hook up a one gallon can of gas by hose to the fuel rail? Gravity can do the job of the fuel pump. There could be no doubt of the mpgs then.
Thinkify1 1 year ago
@Thinkify1 Do you know what you are talking about? This car is fuel injected, it needs fuel preassure. Be sides If the car tank is filled to the very top; "i dont see why it shoud be a non accurate measure. Whatever the engine sucked from the tank and then refilled WILL give you the exact fuel comsumed.
wertyh11 1 year ago
@wertyh11 Actually I do know what I am talking about. I worked ten years in a dyno room at roush. An engine can function by a gravity fed system, no fuel pump required. I have no doubt that the HHO system works. It's not that big of a deal to pop a fuel line at the fuel rail. Get a 1L resevoir container and hang it from the rear coat hangers in the back seat. Connect the jug to the fuel rail with tubing (7ft). As long as you're not driving uphill, you should be ok. I just want the data.
Thinkify1 1 year ago
But I agree, 32 miles is not a test run. There is entrance onto the highway and all that.
bertharogan 1 year ago
We just were too cheap to put in a chip for the oxygen sensors. If the exhaust burns cleaner, the computer adds gas. The Hydrogen was not there for the engine to run on as an extra fuel. Instead it allows more of the gas to be combusted that is already being used. Gasoline engines are VERY inefficient and to burn wasted gasoline will help provide power. Just my opinions, Fancy energy equations or not, what works works. But it is hard to miscalculate 60 mpg for a year, come on.
bertharogan 1 year ago
I say it is possible. I have had two escorts of the same vintage with high miles and consistently got 37-39 mpg. If it actually WORKS for someone, why not try to find out how they do it, instead of telling them the world is flat? Personally, the hho did not work for me. I had a huge old Pontiac with a 5.0 liter engine, and nothing changed. But with that size car, I'm not surprised. Now on a 98 Jeep, it DID decrease the mileage. But, that is not proof that it didn't work.
bertharogan 1 year ago
Diesel is the way to go for economy and power. Forget these silly hydrogen generators, they take a huge amount of power and use more fuel for no effect. How did you adjust your ECU to accomodate the hydrogen input and reduce petrol injection in proportion? Unless you did that it's pointless. Your figures are wrong, that car will give you 30mpg. I agree about not buying hybrid, but don't be conned by companies selling hydrogen kits, they are really conning people - really silly people!
urbex2007 1 year ago
@urbex2007 Speaking about the economy, diesel isn't clean enough to even use a cat converter, they will burn it up as fast as a gas engine missing out. When they burn as completely as gasoline and omit no soot, they will then be good for the economy.
isomgmsghs 2 months ago
@isomgmsghs economy and environment are two different things.
punkmonkey123 1 month ago 2
well what can i say i have been trying to get it to work on my car for 6 months and i have now come to it that it does not work and i am putting up a challenge to anyone who nos about it to get my car to do more than 35 mpg on hho so i would like to be proven wrong it may work on the bench but not in a car so prove me wrong
1812simon 1 year ago
0:53 tell me what you hear
johntrebec 1 year ago
@johntrebec a little before 0:53
johntrebec 1 year ago
thanks for your videos. I also have a ford escort, but the water is heated when it is producing HHO q normal to warm the water.
elpeochasdos 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
freemicrosoftpoint[DOT]com is the best!
h0rrrsssyy 1 year ago
These skeptics crack me the hell up. Im in the process of an installation myself. I made a very crude hydrogen generator and Ill tell you, 1 small bulb will produce a pretty big bang. I was very impressed with the simplicity. Americans can be so naive. You guys can blow your money on gas tax. I'll be spend mine on something useful.
grock1980 2 years ago
I had bought an 83 Ford truck many years ago with a small HO version. One cylinder had a hole in the piston. Not that it caused the problem, but it does make me think it had.
It was a small glass bottle like a mason jar and it had a spiral coil. While ignition on, it was ' as if ' boiling. It smelled, I disconnected it and took it off, the glass jar broke and I don't know where it went.
I had lived in Wisconsin back then and Red Forman now comes to mind saying; " dumbass! " :
aleon1018 2 years ago
"HHO" is a HHOax. These silly things take more energy from the crankshaft than they return. They will REDUCE fuel economy, but will NEVER increase it! Not unless you can find a 100% efficient alternator belt, 100% efficient alternator, 100% efficient electrolyser and a 100% efficient internal combustion engine, "HHO" systems won't do so much as break even. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says 'no free lunch!'
revolxaohemwolb 2 years ago 2
@revolxaohemwolb 1) 4cil 2ltr engine uses 2,000 ltrs of air per minuteat 2000rpm
2ltrs x 2000rpms / 2 = 2000ltrs of air per min
3 or 6 ltrs per min of hho wont do s...
2) hho alone inside an engine contracts (implodes) into h2o (water) doesnt explode like gas therefore 4 stroke engines will not work on hho alone
SPREAD THE WORD!!
if you want to know more just let me know
forfunmx 1 year ago
Why anyone would fight against these devices is beyond me. We obviously need better energy sources. This is obviously a viable fuel. Though it is incorrect, I will further debunk your claim. Use a solar panel to charge additional batteries. OR find any number of ways to produce the electricity. .......and you have no argument.
Hydrogen>Oil
everythingeco 1 year ago
@revolxaohemwolb Very closed minded. Im using it in my car and have increased it from 40-45mpgs to 55-63 mpgs. It runs smoother and has more power. Try it on your car and tell me that it doesn't work
derikk123 1 year ago
@derikk123 what kinda of car do u have ???
i've heard HHO would make ur car air intake backfired, did u have any problem with it ???
lquangbinh1 1 year ago
Comment removed
LightCyrus 1 year ago
@revolxaohemwolb Tell that to the Japanese
LightCyrus 1 year ago
@revolxaohemwolb Actually, both the first and second law say "no free lunch."
Not even a cheap lunch.
p3snooper 1 year ago
@revolxaohemwolb it doesnt work like that... a gas engine isnt 100% efficient either... they hydrogen just aids in burning the fuel in the engine, instead of burning that fuel in the cats.... and actually youre alternator is always creating un-needed energy and it is just wasted, and that is all that is required to run this...
paladain55 1 year ago
@revolxaohemwolb Critics of HHO technology that invoke the first law of thermodynamics usually do so saying, that there is no such thing as a perpetual motion machine. What the critics fail to recognize however, is that HHO is a fuel additive, so no one is talking about a perpetual motion machine. Car owners are looking towards aftermarket HHO generators to supplement the fuel on their gasoline-powered cars (or diesel-powered). stfu
japimportssuck 10 months ago
@japimportssuck Thank you very much...i was thinking the same thing.
bigdaddy0522 9 months ago
@revolxaohemwolb It isn't taking much from the crankshaft bud, its taking it from the battery, i realize the alternator is powered by the serpentine belt but it isn't working that hard. Plus you are introducing a secondary fuel source, Hydrogen, and an oxidizer, oxygen, thus oxidizing all the hydrogen AND gasoline creating a complete burn. Where you gain is burning fuel that would otherwise be unspent and burned in the catalytic converter.
bigdaddy0522 9 months ago
@revolxaohemwolb u ignorant cocksucker! look at all the results on here!!! Go look it up. the alternator makes 20 amps of power whether your taking that power and using it or not!! HHO generator uses between 10 and 20, so ur not affecting the milage at all in a negative way! Now look at the 10-100 percent increase in gas milage that people are getting and tell me that they dont work!
mikelwhitlock 9 months ago
@revolxaohemwolb Please explain how they take up more energy than they return. Because if you don't have a good enough explanation on why it wouldn't work, a lot of people will just think you work for an oil company.
knrwingnut 8 months ago
@revolxaohemwolb ....still some pretty good gas mileage, nobody said the gas was free...you're an idiot
Thorax232 8 months ago
@revolxaohemwolb its an oxidizer and helps the fuel burn more efficienty. its a catalyst, so it speeds up the combustion process, so therefore all fuel is burnt inside the engine... not spit out and burnt in the catalytic converters.... gasoline engines on average are about 20% efficient, and this just helps it burn that other few percent
paladain55 5 months ago
Perhaps putting this "kit" on a easy to do list so others can prove this is true & real. Then spell out the costs and all the things to consider this.
60 Miles per gallon is a very big number to produce. It figures to about 33% increase in MPG.
Who would not want 33% fuel efficientcy increase no a days?
Let this be proven out.......
zobcity01 2 years ago
If it ran THAT good on hydrogen, you wouldn't even BE at the gas station, since you would be driving on the hydrogen.
ScubaSteveM45 2 years ago
@ScubaSteveM45
escorts works whith gasoline no HHO, HHO only Boosts the Mileage
harckez 2 years ago
its a hybrid
bensbargains 2 years ago
Well whatever, don't hold your breath waiting for me to do this on my car.
ScubaSteveM45 2 years ago
What do you think about the new Ford Taurus with the Ecoboost engine?
buckle823 2 years ago
I wonder why its a multi billion dollar scientific research about fuel cells when people like you have already solved the problem!!! WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN HIDING???
iraqifreak 2 years ago
I think its just hype, there is no legal requirement anything in a Youtube video has to be 100% truthful
ScubaSteveM45 2 years ago
My 98 Escort Sedan gets approx 34 in town and 39 on the highway. 60 miles per gallon is not double that. I would like to get this kit and install it on mine!
minivan442 2 years ago
I'd like to see you run the car dry and then add precisely 10 gallons of gas into the tank (measured by weight). Then go on a trip at 60 mph on cruise control. Then you will know what mpg you really get.
Umaxen 2 years ago 10
@Umaxen gasoline is measured by weight now?
agvulpine 1 year ago
@Umaxen Your comment lacks of logic. The tank was filled to the max. and was refilled to the MAX. after the milage. How in the world is this guy is going to know if the tank on the car is back filled to the TEN gallon mark after the milage run? Is it not smarter the way he did the test than what you are suggesting? Kind of stupid is it not?
wertyh11 1 year ago
@Umaxen Road conditions: I like to know what will this same test tells me if the U tuber fill the tank at the same gasoline station and go's back home.
wertyh11 1 year ago
@Umaxen Even easier fill the tank full, use the specs to find the capacity and drive till the light comes on, fill up to the brim calculate fuel spent vs distance traveled.
Capitanvolume 5 months ago
lol... your method of measuring fuel economy is flawed. 32 miles of driving cannot indicated overal driving situations. but even more important, you need to drive far enough to consume most of the fuel in the tank so that you minimize the error that occurs by not being able to top up the tank to the EXACT level of fullness that you did during the first fill. the error can skew the results in either direction. filling the tank more full would lower mpg: under filling would raise mpg.
randolphmarshall 2 years ago
I don't know how it works.. but I have one on my car too, and it's increased my mileage by 30% in the first 2 weeks of driving it... still waiting to see if it gets better :)
LifeDesign09 2 years ago
60 mpg? bullshit. a little hydrogen isn't gonna double your mileage
creamyfilling102 2 years ago
AWESOME :)
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Trashy nurse ass fcked by doctor! - TUBEANALPORN[.]COM
FRASERFoster4948 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
Trina shows a few her top assets to get the job - TEENBOOBSTUBE[.]COM
qokofaqikoge 2 years ago 5
How much HHO per minute was the cell producing?
enyawod 2 years ago
was an EFIE installed? were you able to duplicate the results since? i'm only asking for my own edification, not to challenge your results...
pgpeachess 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Passionate h0t couple lovemaking in bed! - REAL*PORN*ONLINE*.*NET
zo6ez3go 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Super h0t blonde gets a facial after anal - 1ANALTUBE(.)COM
quw4uueo 2 years ago 3
can you put it on a 1996 cavy
needforWoW 2 years ago
HOW MUCH TO CONVERT MY ESCORT?
pill707clinton 2 years ago
Well done Guys??
Tropicous 2 years ago
This is hardly scientific, there are many hyper miler techniques which would yield the same result. EPA economy tests would have the car run on a closed course at least one run several laps each direction and an average MPG based on actual fuel useage. You also are careful to not show if the car is manual or automatic. Way too much deception going on here.
PUREAAMERICAN 2 years ago 2
You'll have to calculate after using a few tanks of gas before I'll believe 60MPG ! Topping up after a short trip is complete bullS.
borrowedcarbon14 2 years ago
60mpg? That's not difficult at all. One example: european ford escort with the 1.8l diesel. That will give you a good 60mpg without installing any dubious scam devices.
petem1989 2 years ago
That's UK MPG.
borrowedcarbon14 2 years ago
1 Imperial gallon= 1.2 US gallon. Therefore 60mpg would equate to 50mpg in US gallons. This on a rather old engine. Modern diesels can be even more efficient
petem1989 2 years ago
How wide is the trunk on an Escort Wagon? How long is it until it hits a front seat back? Can a single mattress bed fit in?
thiswasatest 2 years ago 2
what's up with all these "We're sorry, this video is no longer available." WTF is up with youtube.
lilguyboi03 2 years ago
how do i convert my car to that ?
renell 2 years ago
Go check out greenchektech you will be please like i did!
007Dendo 3 years ago
go to thegas4free,blogspot,com if you want to learn how to make your car run on water. It is a way better system.
jedwhelchel 3 years ago
Why not run it till the tank was close to empty, so that we get some higher resolution on those numbers?!
norwegian75 3 years ago 2
It's call a eletrolysis, not a hydrogen generator.
TommeyLeeReed 3 years ago
do you use top oil
5154952 3 years ago
Any thoughts, ideas or suggestions as to how to keep the water from freezing in the winter in the cell?
partwerks 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
22/f/single/cam! ne1 want to see? F
PAiiGEANDCOURTNEY 3 years ago
im curious as to where to plumb this into a turbo vehicle that has a maf sensor setup.. if it would be ok to inject it where the air filter is, it would be measured by the maf sensor, then run thru the hot turbo, the intercooler to the throttle body. Would the hot turbo be trouble to potentially ignite the hydrogen?
streetphase 3 years ago
Use an inefficient alternator (80% efficient) to generate electricity using mechanical energy from the engine. Then use the electricity to generate hydrogen and oxygen (40% efficient). Then burn the hydrogen and oxygen in the engine (40% efficient). So the engine will make 12.8% what the alternator consumes.
This technology is effectively a 12.8% efficient battery.
masteropie001 3 years ago
is that engine diesel?
alienarnold 3 years ago
I developed a intercooler spray that helps with MPG, HP, and tq on turbo vehicles. Check it out on my channel!
eautocad 3 years ago
Does this work on all cars and trucks? How did you make it and hook it up to?
finemofok 3 years ago
are you joking, this is fake...
moneyman10k 3 years ago
Do some research Einstein, this has been around for a very long time. BMW even has a vehicle running off a similar concept.
LBpDC 3 years ago
you are wrong and you don't know why. why doesn't every car do this if it is so easy and cheap to more than double the efficiency of the car? do you think there is a conspiracy?
moneyman10k 3 years ago
I think it is impractical to implement into production with the liability myself. It will be one more thing consumers have to worry about, plus I have seen videos of some exploding while in the car. But really am skeptical as well, but I have an open mind. I think if it can do something with the extra juice, then why not. Just dont know.
dbui72 3 years ago
"I have seen videos of some exploding while in the car"
Really?
Can you list the titles of these vids cause I havent seen any.
BTW I am curious too, thats why I am testing out this hydroxy stuff - to see for myself whether it works or not. My first cell gave me a 14.63% increase in mpg. I am not 100% sold on hydroxy, but the test results are encouraging to say the least.
Anyway dont forget to list the titles of these 'exploding while in car' vids.
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
people are stupid, like you.
Ergock 3 years ago
one reason is if you dont check water level the metal can create a spark and ignite hydrogen and this would hurt oil companys bad
whatup061 3 years ago
no conspiracy but if u owned a company would u make a product that takes away ur profits?
no
Big auto & big oil have been hand in hand for years. If they made a car that ran on water or partly on h2o, that would break both big auto & oil.
But what about pure hydrogen cars they make?
Easy, that is a product they can produce & sell - its a replacement for gasoline; just another profit stream. By focusing on pure hydrogen, big auto & oil will have profits for another 100+ yrs.
go figure
;)
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
The bmw car runs on hydrogen that has already been produced at a plant that is the only way a car can run on hydrogen. These systems don't work simple physics tells us why and the electrolytes won't make a huge difference.
024reredrum 2 years ago
the bmw you are refering to has double the carbon footprint of conventionally fueled cars of similar size and performance. why? because the electricity used to product the hydrogen in that plant that you speak of is generated by burning COAL. this is a major drawback of hybrid and electric cars also. FYI
randolphmarshall 2 years ago
you are such a faggot
kustomcougar 3 years ago
Our 95 escort wagon gets 35 mpg stock.We are working on adding an hho generator. I assume smaller cars don't need as much HHO. How many LPM of HHO is your output? What kind of set up are you using in your generator?
Thanks
kayakdad325 3 years ago
Ours gets about 40 with no mods, but 60 isn't bad.
tubeofyou12xz0 3 years ago
I got a 1995 ford escort wagon with SEFI fuel injection, if someone wants to purchase it.
Allthebestvideos 3 years ago
I have an escort wagon of the same vintage. I took it on a 302 mile trip in Michigan and got 39.5 MPG, all while hauling a 17' sea kayak on top and a whole bunch of camping gear. You don't need pvc pipes full of water under your hood to get good mileage, you just need a well maintained mid nineties 4 cyl. and good driving habits. I really mean the mid nineties stuff. I had a 2004 Focus and it could get 30-31 at the absolute best w/o the boat on top.
mikesova 3 years ago
In case you missed the point. 60 mpg is much better than 40 mpg
beatfreakish 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We need to start drilling for oil offshore now, because the sooner we do, the sooner we will have more domestic oil. There are more than 250,000,000 registered vehicles in the United States. These gas burners aren't going away overnight. They will have to be phased out over not years, but decades. Let's go for alternative fuels, but let's be realistic about the time frame! High fuel prices hit the poor, elderly and middle class the hardest! Cancel your vacation Congress and act now!
Joelduffy 3 years ago 3
dhgmust: A repost because some enviromentalist jackass didn't think his opinion was important.
Joelduffy 3 years ago
Go work for BMW man, they could use brilliant engineers like yourself!!!
drew999999999 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We need to start drilling for oil offshore now, because the sooner we do, the sooner we will have more domestic oil. There are more than 250,000,000 registered vehicles in the United States. These gas burners aren't going away overnight. They will have to be phased out over not years, but decades. Let's go for alternative fuels, but let's be realistic about the time frame! High fuel prices hit the poor, elderly and middle class the hardest! Cancel your vacation Congress and act now!
dhgmust 3 years ago 2
Not a very accurate test (ime). Run the tank out and fill it up - or - meter a gallon directly and drive the car till it stops.
clecollins 3 years ago
read the description to this video.
sm0ky40 3 years ago
Not sure what you mean... "60 MPG Escort Wagon" is all I see. I'm not doubting your figures, I am just saying you should do more testing in a way that would show a more accurate count. This would entail running longer or metering the fuel accurately say perhaps by installing a one gallon tank to run from. Now I am not sure if you have a fuel pump in your tank or machanical on the engine. Of course the mechanical pump would be easier to do the test with.
clecollins 3 years ago
it's got electrolytes!
GamerGuy51 3 years ago
Too short a trip to measure mileage. Gas expands as it warms up, and if your engine returns fuel to the gas tank, it will raise the temperature several degrees, so it will appear to have used less than it really did. Always! Drive it for 2-3 tankfulls before you can average the mpg.
light4darkness 3 years ago 2
do you ever go to muskegon, mi ? You sound VERY familiar :)
unkn0wnhacka 3 years ago
Interesting.... I Can get 60MPG out my Peugeot 306 TD HDI (UK) as standard, cost where ever I can and can push it to 65. A 4 Litre Gallon costs about $10 though :( but compare that to most 15mpg US gas guzzlers and were well better off!
sismithin 3 years ago
dude...your narration is so f'ing boring.
green95gt 3 years ago
green96gt... geniuses are not amusing or outspoken people... just look at Einstein. If your looking for someone who is outspoken and entertaining then listen to the village idiot... AKA you.
mrhozer 3 years ago
Einstein was both amusing and outspoken...dumbass. Motha' f'in hozer.
green95gt 3 years ago
Americans complaining about their cheap gas again. They 'want it all' but they just don't want to pay for it. LOL
debaucheryBotched 3 years ago
Don't worry your lil head about us Americans. We will do just fine. Go save the planet. and wait for us to rescue your ass again....LOL
free4danny 3 years ago 2
I'm Canadian.....rescue me from what? paying higher than US gas prices? while we fight the real battle in Afganistan, while you have your thumb up your ass in Iraq. And don't get me started how your weak ass dollar is driving ours through the roof. Please we don't need your help, you've done enough already. LOL
debaucheryBotched 3 years ago
Canada has an army?
p9009p 3 years ago 2
canada has an army that defeated the usa in the war of 1812 thank you very much.
Polly514 3 years ago
The truth hurts, just that much more, when one poses an ignorant question.
Chrispolowater 3 years ago
The war of 1812 was fought between Britain and the U.S. Canada was a British colony. I don't think Canada can take credit for that victory.
NUKE442 3 years ago
whether or not we were a country at the time dosen't change the outcome. The same people lived here before and after confederation just weren't called Canadians yet :P
T33o 2 years ago
good, you guys need a better dollar...
else youd be starving AND freezing...
SUPER LOL!
Zephippz 3 years ago
These americans pay US$1 per litre of petrol, yet us Australians pay US$1.50 per litre. Despite their poor dollar they still have cheap gas.
raulitech 3 years ago
As for you raulitech, I don't get it either.
I say a low amount of taxes and supply/demand. 300 million heavy consumers=guaranteed high supply.
Zephippz 3 years ago
that's why they prefer to spend tax dollars killing/getting killed in wars for more cheap oil
vacuum 3 years ago
I cannot believe something that idiotic came out of your mouth. Prove it, or get lost.
Zephippz 3 years ago
Well said.
thelaceman 3 years ago
What? 32 miles? You've got to be kidding me! It took you more time to post this video than it did to perform your very 'scientific test.' I think you single handedly set the credibility of HHO gas powered vehicles back ten years. Dork!
kmac1959 3 years ago
You have got to be kidding me. A 32 mile test? Come on...how do you know you topped off the tank to the exact same level both times? On a short trip like that, a tenth of a gallon makes a big difference. That road test is absolutely meaningless. Get back to me when the trip odometer reads 200 plus miles.
burns1210 3 years ago
read the description on this vid.
sm0ky40 3 years ago
i thought the gas pump stops when the tank is full.
adi1096 3 years ago
Say what? Have you never put gas in a car before? You know how it shuts off...but then you can put in a little more and a little more? After the first shut off, you can get in another gallon of gas at most pumps.
burns1210 3 years ago
oh sorry i didnt know im only twelve so no i havent put gas in a car
adi1096 3 years ago
Thanks Smoky40. Are you using any electronics?
happyvalley808 3 years ago
sm0ky40,
when do you think youll be able to market a reliable product? or at least make a video of instructions for us to make our own? this is very good for the environment as well as all of our wallets.
also, i dont know if you saw them, the "power tubes" that another guy is showing on youtube, do you know if his model works and even compares to your steup? i feel that you know whats going om with all your modifications and things.
treylem 3 years ago
Crap.
buggar4466 3 years ago
ok i have a question, after hho burns, it goes back to water, isn't that bad for the engine? what about the cat and exhaust? not trying to be a negative nelly, i just want to know b4 i put it on my car :-)
Smeddog1 3 years ago
No not exaclty .thats like saying if you burn gas it turns back to gas in the exhaust. If your scared about water in the Intake just use a gas line dryer like on a air compressor> think its just called a water separater. I have had 0 problems and Steam doesnt hurt the engine it will help clean out carbon. My throttle body on my van looks brand new but i keep a eye on everything.
Vistal1 3 years ago
dude i dont think it gets 60 mpg but it diffently gets more than normal which is awsome i have a 97 escort (non wagon) and we have put in one of those HHo gens and it gets about 35 mpg now which is about 14 more than originaly and it has a new 180 something horse power engine replacement
vizard91 3 years ago