i dont mean to be a ass or anything, but i think you should put this in HQ cuz looking at it in this quality doesn't show its fully beauty but nice work !!
Now all you need is to put a texture ambi-organic mesh over this with a floating point texture like Crysis to make the water look real and refract light correctly.
@FunnyMcBunny It all depends. Many rendering situations (like in games) just need very parallel GPUs, scientific visualization typically uses large data sets, so RAM is most important; but physical simulation done before rendering requires lots of CPU power (speed and parallelization).
@FunnyMcBunny Depends on what you're doing and what you're looking for. CPU will increase the speed of the rendering and simulations, but generally you need ridiculous amounts of RAM for complex simulations. Each part of the simulation is generally stored in the RAM, depending on the size. If it's a large simulation, each part will be written to the hard disk, but in large simulations, a single frame can take up many many GBs meaning it will fill the RAM before it can be written to the hdd.
realflow is a 3d animation program (like c4d) which lets you simulate realistic water (and smoke) effects. But it's complicated and if you're PC is slow the letting one drop fall will take a veeerry long time
It exists (1080p30). It's at a show in Tampa until March 24. I'm also collaborating on an HD version for live performance. Will Youtube show my uploaded HD content, or do I need to pay?
I've never used Processing before---I mainly work on Linux. Oh, I see they have a Linux version, finally.
I'll look into it, but I somehow doubt it is able to handle the everything-affects-everything type of computations that I did for both the modeling and rendering of the clip.
I used a whole pile of C code: some from my research, some from a great renderer called Radiance.
It is a lot of things. At one level, it is a fluid simulation from my graduate school research. At another, it is my first experiment in radiosity raytracing for animation. Finally, it is a new media art piece that looks at the essence of fluid (its motion) by stripping away all of its context. Is it smoke, or water, or fire, or none of those, or all of those?
i think you may have just fucked up my shit
soaringwalrus 6 months ago
i dont mean to be a ass or anything, but i think you should put this in HQ cuz looking at it in this quality doesn't show its fully beauty but nice work !!
SHQIPTARSOULJA 6 months ago
the first part look like some sort of austin powers intro, rofll ;P
k4y0tick1ller 8 months ago
I didn't see any water or fire this was retarded.
ProperSauce 1 year ago
@ProperSauce kid gtfo, we don't need your immaturity here. Just leave.
nameno1elsehas 1 year ago
@nameno1elsehas i'm still here
ProperSauce 1 year ago
Now all you need is to put a texture ambi-organic mesh over this with a floating point texture like Crysis to make the water look real and refract light correctly.
illmagnified 2 years ago
you definately need to put a trance track to this
morell999 2 years ago
Perhaps speed it up to make it look smoother?
Randomnessnocity 2 years ago
nice, looks like a wireframe mesh vis of smoke in realflow 4
Precognist 2 years ago
no clue what this is but it looks cool... 5/5
paimail21 2 years ago
art or not . its incredibly interesting. It took you 3 weeks to animate this? definitely the most complicated animation I've ever seen,
FreonRose 2 years ago
@ 1dt I was like big whoop he can use meta, but this came out nice. Render time? And what system specs?
hazonku 2 years ago
I don't know what "meta" is, but this animation took about 3 weeks on a quad-core Phenom at 2.5 GHz.
technolope 2 years ago
@technolope Isn't RAM more important when it comes to rendering?
FunnyMcBunny 1 year ago
@FunnyMcBunny It all depends. Many rendering situations (like in games) just need very parallel GPUs, scientific visualization typically uses large data sets, so RAM is most important; but physical simulation done before rendering requires lots of CPU power (speed and parallelization).
technolope 1 year ago 3
@technolope
I believe he's talking about metaballs (basically spheres that "gloop" together and only the outside layer is rendered)
DKM101 1 year ago
@FunnyMcBunny Depends on what you're doing and what you're looking for. CPU will increase the speed of the rendering and simulations, but generally you need ridiculous amounts of RAM for complex simulations. Each part of the simulation is generally stored in the RAM, depending on the size. If it's a large simulation, each part will be written to the hard disk, but in large simulations, a single frame can take up many many GBs meaning it will fill the RAM before it can be written to the hdd.
EXCESSENTERTAINMENT 1 year ago
Nice effect!!
hamiltonafjr 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Its cool & he has talent but I honestly wouldn't call it Art
chris512 2 years ago
This is art u dumbasses...
Not a fucking animation to show what he can do.
Retards.
kittyburger000 2 years ago
Art is an institution and not anything what YOU call art it is.
MORON.
insanedb 2 years ago
vale verga tu weaaa
jrgb10 2 years ago
very cool, but would be better with some colors and maybe a differente texture , but it's really nice!
FireplayerStas 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
heyyyy ,i have c4d but the serial expired can enywone help meeeeeeeeeeeee
Ashnellamt 2 years ago
buy another!!!
666SOURCE666 2 years ago 6
what is real flow anyways? yea i am pretty retarded lol but it looks cool
polor02 3 years ago 3
realflow is a 3d animation program (like c4d) which lets you simulate realistic water (and smoke) effects. But it's complicated and if you're PC is slow the letting one drop fall will take a veeerry long time
darklightchaser 3 years ago
woah cewl o.o
polor02 3 years ago
real flow is not like c4d at all
insanedb 2 years ago
living snake skin anybody? very nice haha. I like it
what did you use?
sacul109498 3 years ago
I made the geometry using a big program that I wrote for my thesis. For rendering, I used Radiance.
technolope 3 years ago
U are so pro OMG
good lies
siedlikmasterek 2 years ago
I'd absolutely love to see this in HD!
OlisTheSecond 3 years ago
It exists (1080p30). It's at a show in Tampa until March 24. I'm also collaborating on an HD version for live performance. Will Youtube show my uploaded HD content, or do I need to pay?
technolope 3 years ago
No payment is required.
OlisTheSecond 3 years ago
looks trippy
car000333 3 years ago
I don't know what you'd be able to use this for besides a nightmare or alternate reality where reality is pulled into a "web" of elusive dreams.
agentnightfusion 3 years ago
A large rock striking gas giant?
masterpiraka 3 years ago
Looks like some kind of alternate dementia liquid spider web.
agentnightfusion 3 years ago
pretty
zck20200 3 years ago
looks a bit like a planet getting crashed by ring meteors xD
ecreif 3 years ago
Good, but i needs a diff texture IMHO it needs to look softer and whiter in complexion and also more partical breakup
gooseroos2 3 years ago
it´s totally amazing - I was sitting in front of this tv on siggraph slow art exhibition for 30 minutes just to see it again! congratulations!
aenjota 3 years ago
how did you do this? processing?
aenjota 3 years ago
I've never used Processing before---I mainly work on Linux. Oh, I see they have a Linux version, finally.
I'll look into it, but I somehow doubt it is able to handle the everything-affects-everything type of computations that I did for both the modeling and rendering of the clip.
I used a whole pile of C code: some from my research, some from a great renderer called Radiance.
technolope 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i love this video. Awesome
itsteebo 3 years ago
wow...what is this?
martha0816 3 years ago
It is a lot of things. At one level, it is a fluid simulation from my graduate school research. At another, it is my first experiment in radiosity raytracing for animation. Finally, it is a new media art piece that looks at the essence of fluid (its motion) by stripping away all of its context. Is it smoke, or water, or fire, or none of those, or all of those?
technolope 3 years ago
Nice, but Toooo slow
pand0ras 4 years ago 2