Added: 4 years ago
From: artynz
Views: 14,841
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (57)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • so a wave is what something does, right? Like in your water waves, the nature of the waves only exists within the water medium. Am I to understand that the wave nature of matter exists in the ether medium? So the physical thing that is acting as a wave is the ether itself? I hope that makes sense.

  • This is great water on a speaker to show wave structures. The same or similar thing happens when you put salt on a drum skin the beat throws the salt into a pattern. Some Dutch geezer invented a contraption with a sound chamber & fine wires, small weights, then when a musical note is struck, the wires vibrate into a geometric pattern; ive always wanted to get hold of one but cant remember what they are called. I saw it on Adam Hart Davies` science series.

  • @TwoDigitz I think you are talking about Keely.

  • Ok. I'm a noob; what does it mean that matter is waves?

    That all particles like neutrons, electrons etc... are waves? What exactly are you referring to when you say matter? Thx!

  • @Pravesh7 It means that matter is not part particle and part wave. It is entirely a spherical standing wave and nothing else. Just like the standing waves in the cymatics experiment, all the "particle" properties arise from the wave nature.

  • If you know how to make a universe ... Why don't you manufacture them and market them ?

  • @zimtran007 How many more Universes do we need? ;-)

  • @zimtran007 Well according to 'science', yes 'science' Haha, there are an infinite number of other universes. Otherwise the anthropic principle doesn't work.

  • @zimtran007 IMO the anthropic principle is a cop out. By "Universe" I mean everything that exists. In that case there can only be one Universe. These infinite number of things should not be called Universes.

  • @artynz Yes, worse, they are an infinite number of forever unobservable things for which we can never hope to obtain observational evidence, yet some 'scientists' , actually put this idea forward as a 'scientific' explaination for the laws of physics being the way that they are. It's so funny that it makes you want to cry.

  • i have a thoery ,i think the universe began with 2

  • looks like an interference pattern, between the tray dimensions and the distribution of inertia of the water particles.

  • @daenumen you could say that, but I am not sure if you are meaning "just a .....".

    Of course in the universe there is no tray as far as we know. However there are potential wells that have a similar effect. Because atoms are often regularly spaced (e.g. in crystals) what leaks out from one is symmetrical with what leaks in from the next. The same applies at larger scales to galaxies stars and planets.

  • I get it now tone effects speed and consistency cool but still whats the medium oh it hurts my head I Iike the turtle theory better kidding.This ties in to buckminster fullers synergetics.Anyway some of us like to call the medium kia its black and it feels good.

  • my bad I cant put it that well I think I get it now the medium changes depending on the speed of the wave stretching the medium to the speed.

  • @hartejoseph When the waves are greater amplitude, the medium gets stretched more and it makes the waves travel faster. This is just the same as something like a guitar string.

  • so we are back too the constant universe

  • I see the four and the three does it repeat in different mediums or am I just thinking about it too much sorry dont mind me just thinking out loud its the celt in me.

  • Does it have to be high tensile or is it of different consistency in different areas we know the intensity of the sound changes but does the consistency of the medium change?Dont get too obsessed with the pattern because you are using different mediums!But I also could be wrong because it is tuned quite well!

  • I know it the answer to everything the earth is sitting on a turtle!But what is the turtle sitting on?Oh its sitting on another turtle!Yeah but what is that turtle sitting on?Ah thats easy theres turtles going all the way down!

  • II see you finally figured out that frequency was part of a wave, im glad you werent listening to Geoff

  • magic quad of multiplication

  • This theory is amazing. It unifies general relativity and quantum mechanics and solves all the problems of each at the same time!!!!! Why don't the scientists take this theory to the next level. Has anyone tried to publish a paper on this yet?

  • No. I have given talks about it around the world though.

    Publishing in peer review journals would be difficult because it would need about 10 papers in different disciplines all referencing each other.

  • Great video.. i think i will try some more cymatics experiments myself.. :-)

  • Yes, please do. And let us all know about your results. I do add other "wobbly universe" related videos to my channel.

  • Sacred geometry is geometry used in the design of sacred architecture and sacred art. The basic belief is that geometry and mathematical ratios, harmonics and proportion are also found in music, light, and cosmology.

  • Yes, sacred geometry is interesting in regard to cymatics and the wave structure of matter. However I want to point out that there is nothing mystical about it so that scientists can look with an open mind. It is simply the science of standing wave centres interacting.

  • i think i get it - you and i and everything in fact are made out of dancing jelly. can't help but wonder what flavour...

    right, part 3. bring it on!

  • All flavours are present :-)

  • dear sir i watched your vids and find them incredibly interesting. in order to better understand could you explain me in more detail what exactly aether is?

    what do you think about theory of "electric universe"?its propagators also reject big bang theory and truly what they say sounds convincing

  • I think that Alfven had some understanding which is relevant to galaxy formation, but that present ideas concerning electric universe in the solar system do not make sense as gravity explains motions to very high precision.

  • To me, aether is a tensile medium, like a block of steel or a bowl of jelly, but not made of anything smaller (in that case atoms) and so is continuous. It is everywhere in the universe. We do not see the aether, we see waves in the aether because we ourselves are composites of waves in the aether.

  • artynz,

    If I undertand it correctly, in the video you posit that the wave structure is not 100% stable due to non-linearity near the centre. That it is always "losing" a bit of energy, which is manifested as harmonics of the (out?) wave. I find that intriguing, since to my mind, it would be a mechanism for the origin of matter as well as explaining decay.

    My confusion is: does a bit of energy get transformed on each cycle of the standing wave? What would be the rate of conversion?

  • Yes, the non-linearity exists everywhere but is much more significant near centres. Typically the rate of conversion is 1 part in 10^40 of the energy passing through the centre in each wave. That is a very low rate and so impossible to directly measure.

    However it does mean that there is a residual force in a neutral atom which is that much smaller and which we observe as gravity.

    ...

  • ...

    Secondly, it means that nucleons gain mass at this rate of about 1 / 10^40 per oscillation or at a rate of 1 part per 14 billion years. This is what we observe as the cosmological red shift. No velocity is involved, no big bang.

  • Yes I agree.

  • good stuff but what causes the vibration ?

  • How can we find a beginning? We can always ask what caused that. God does not help as what caused God? I cannot say more than it behaves as if a big blob of stuff was given a whack with something. Perhaps Terry Pratchett's description of the universe being one drip from a might sneeze is quite accurate.

  • Dear Ray

    Have you written a book? I would like very much to have your fullest thesis on this subject as well as its history. If you have not published this or do not plan to do so do you have a guided bibliography (PDF?) for this theory? It is terribly compelling. But it would terrific if you got a book out. You could go straight to an e-publisher for us "occult" enthusiast (play on words intentional).

  • No, I have tried tom start a book about four times. There is quite a lot on my web pages or just do a search for "Ray Tomes" or "Harmonics Theory" and you will find lots of stuff.

  • Have you guys heard of Walter Russell? - he figured it out too, and he was not a physicist. Amazing book - "The Secret of Light". You will see that this is all true.

    These videos are phenomenal and explain it all very clearly, better than Russell, IMHO. Thank you, artynz, for opening our mind's eyes - our souls knew this already but can't get through to our brains, they don't speak the same language ;-)

  • I have heard of Walter Russell and read a little of him. A number of people have asked me that, so there is obviously some similarity of ideas.

    It is a funny thing, that although I come from the scientific camp originally, my stuff does seem to appeal to people in the feelings camp.

  • So does each material have it's own reaction and form to a given frequency/vibration. If so is it possible that the matter that our bodies are made up of are reacting to a vibrational field that is all around us holding the fabric of the physical realm in it's current forms?

  • Yes, different materials have different natural vibrations. These are known in physics as resonances of atoms and molecules and also the characteristic frequencies of light produced by and absorbed by various substances.

    Yes, the field all around us has all the vibrations issuing continually from all objects in the Universe and is constantly reconstructed every moment by the waves arrive back from rest of the Universe.

  • This is extremely interesting. Just curious for your view on this. I read some where that water molecules react to human emotion by forming patterns. Have you ever heard of this? If so why do think that mental or emotional feeling, which are supposed to be non material thing have an effect on the physical world? And if they do have an effect on the physical world could our percpectives or emotions be the driving force behind the vibrations that move the ether?

  • I have heard of this, but do not know whether it is true or not. However humans are mostly water and store a lot of stuff, so it may be right.

    Certainly emotions and thoughts have associated vibrations. Emotions are mostly due to various chemicals running around our body. Each chemical substance has a unique set of modes of vibration that are responsible for whatever that emotion does.

    Our thoughts and emotions are not fully contained within our bodies. We are like a radio transmitter.

  • ok,

    this is the first theory that fits - physics, mystic, it fits. it feels right, and adds up.

    so - what is the LHC going to do, throw a bomb into the aether?

    do we need a major natural disaster to permanently disable the armageddon device?

  • I don't think that they can find the ultimate starting point of the Universe by going to smaller and smaller scales. The Universe starts from the largest scales. I don't think that we need fear what it will make. There are far more powerful cosmic Rays hitting the Earth quite regularly.

  • Most westerners have difficulty with the concept of the physical universe being secondary to mind, steeped as they are in materialism. Yet all knowledge of the physical universe is through the senses which are the connection of mind to the physical world, so only through mind can physics be known.

  • When I awoke in this world as a conscious being I was already, in the highest sense, self. I identify that as my essence, not the properties that make up my physical existence. The physical is secondary to that Self, all the great mystics have experienced this. Can there be a better proof than that. That everything in the known universe arises from ether and vibration can also be true and resonates with the Self.

  • Thanks for your thoughts thankyouira. I think that true science and true spirituality meet, although we don't often do it that way. Sorry for being so long in replying.

  • So the ether is eternal? Do the properties of electromagnetism arise from the ether? You used an outside force to vibrate the water (ether). Where does that force originate in the universe? As I see it you've reduced the eternal principals to two: ether and vibration with vibration having a set of laws such as frequency and intensity. Thanks for your explanation.

  • Yes, eternal aether. Yes, properties of electromagnetism arise from aether. Magnetism is rotation of aether etc.

    I do not think that a beginning to the universe can be found. Having a creator does not help, as where did that creator come from?

  • well, you don't seem bothered by the same question about the aether. Where did the aether come from? Always was? why is that a better answer in regards to aether than about the Creator?

  • Because there is evidence that the aether model will explain the physics of the Universe that we observe.

  • could infinity not be distance but instead be infinite divisions of matter?

    If the universe is all connected and we are living in a holographic illusion were when 2 atoms are separated by what we think of as distance, can communicate instantly without a signal... Is this proof of a unified field theory? Is distance an illusion inside a 3d awareness structure? Is the infinite expanse we see really just division in a finite matrix we call GOD?

  • Well it is a type of infinity. But In our part of the Universe I think that we have actually reached the limit of size with nucleons. To have actual free quarks does require huge additional energy densities and such conditions might exist in the centres of galaxies.

    There is no instantaneous transmission over long distances, but the existence of standing waves may make separate parts be moving in a common way so that it looks like that.

    As to God, to me that is an unnecessary concept.

  • God is not necessary?

    Then who is going to flip on the switch?

    Don't forget that your water experiment was possible only because you were there to create it.

    Without you it couldn't have happened.

    You set it up just right and gave it energy.

    you were the god of those patterns in that little bucket of water.

    Consciousness.....Thats all it is and it lives in YOU.

    :) -Namaste

  • Well if everything requires a switch to be flipped on, who is going to flip God's switch on? There will always be something inexplicable at the beginning. You can call it God, I call it the Universe.

  • Thats the million dollar question.

    But the fact that we can even ask it must mean that it has an answer.

    I know that sounds vague but I I cant image a universe without a creator of some kind.

    I don't think god is a figure but more like a consciousness...and that consciousness experiences itself through living beings like you and me.

    but for the rest of it all I think your bang on.

    Have you tried to give lectures about your studies?

    I bet you could gather quite a following with this.

  • Yes, I have given lectures around the world on the Harmonics Theory and related stuff.

    I have also tried to write a book, but find I am not very good at that, but (as my wife will affirm) I am good at talking. :-)

  • can your wife write?

  • Not about this stuff. But she has done video recording at some conferences in the past.

  • I like how the pattern is more complex in the center.

    It almost stands next to the idea of source energy in the new age philosophy.

    the source of creation radiates duplications of itself into the matrix...and the farther the duplicate travels from the source the less dense and complex it gets.its less holy like in the 3d world we are in now compared to the higher dimensions.

    does the matrix have a finite structure? would we bounce back to the source and recycle the moment we reach the center?

  • Yes, more detail always develops near a centre because the non-linearity is greater there. But then new centres are created as a result also. And so on ...

    I assume that by "bounce back to the source" you mean something like the Mandelbrot set where the pattern is repeated with only slight distortions.

    However in the harmonics there is never a repetition, only somewhat similar. That is because the higher prime numbers come in to the ratios making things always different at smaller scales.

  • so there is center of universe in every particle? nah, nuthing... just thinking outloud.

  • thanks for these vids ray, I always suspected that it seemed like modern physics was mistaken by maintaining unverifiable assumptions just to maintain previous assumptions, I hope in the information age people will began to question this appraoch.

  • Thanks for a good comment. Yes, the information age is a great blessing to people who think. We can find many others like us where without the internet we would be lucky to ever find one or two.

  • "It clearly explains why light and matter only exist at discrete energy states as quantum physics discovered (i.e. Schrodinger's wave equations)."

    Yes. The solution with standing wave modes was self-inferring. It's strange why they didn't figured it out.

    "It is a shame they ignored this obvious solution of the wave structure of matter, and instead worked with the probability wave interpretation (Born)."

    It's not shame - it's an insult against reason! :D

  • Yes, it is, but it seems that from time to time scientists take a wrong turn and then accumulate errors because they can't find the main error. That is because they "know" certain things that are not right.

  • Electromagnetic waves are transverse waves, suggesting a structure in the ether. What needs to be answered is what is the structure of the ether? Waves do indeed make matter but what makes the ether in which the waves propagate? How did the ether come into existence? These are important questions which have to be addressed at some point in the future. Have you made any speculations as to what the current size of the universe is? And if mass=energy does the ether have mass and energy of itself?

  • "Electromagnetic waves are transverse waves, suggesting a structure in the ether. What needs to be answered is what is the structure of the ether?"

    The space itself ;)

    "Waves do indeed make matter but what makes the ether in which the waves propagate?"

    As above. We observe that waves in Nature are vibrating fragments of something [particles], so we think that every wave is made of particles. But those particles are made of waves itself, so we end up in waves again. There's nothing more.

  • "And if mass=energy does the ether have mass and energy of itself?"

    No. Because the mass itself is only an "appearance" ["schaumkommen" as Schroedinger called it]. Mass cannot be made of mass ;) The mass and the energy are one of observable properties of underlying quantum waves [waves in empty space].

  • Hi Ray,

    Nice video / diagrams.

    It clearly explains why light and matter only exist at discrete energy states as quantum physics discovered (i.e. Schrodinger's wave equations).

    It is a shame they ignored this obvious solution of the wave structure of matter, and instead worked with the probability wave interpretation (Born). Just shows the influence the 'particle' concept has on human thinking!

    Geoff Haselhurst

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more