the stang was stock of course a honda is gunna smoke it if they dump money in it for a shitload of mods just to keep up a v8 if the mustang had the same amount of money to dump into it thiers no way the honda wins
@MrAlexdive dude. the honda won by 3/4 of a car.if the cars ran exactly the same you can win by 3/4 of a car just by getting off the line .010 sec quicker.and the stang is stock. go race a mustang with a 460 swap in it.
my friend has a chipped b16a with headers and a pulley,straight 3 inch exhaust and its way faser than this crx,aind its way faster than a stock 5.0,he keeps up with my 5.0 which has pulleys and 373 rear gears,and a intake so tht crx in this video is fairly slow if a 5.0 can keep up by half a car length,or maybe you lost traction because you shoulda smoked him
You guys kill me. Getting an old ass stock 5.0 and use it as a bench mark. Now go find one thats close to the same power to weight ratio and whip his ass. Everyone knows that a stock 5.0 is fairly slow so wouldnt that make your car a lil faster than a fairly slow car. That shit aint worth bragging about. Just saying.
@94z28derk He probably feels great, especially since the B16 is a 20+ year old motor. The 5.0 and the B16 are from the same era. Honda first put B16s in 1988 CRX Si-Rs in Japan. Simply put, that 4 banger can rock with V8s from the same era. Not Honda's fault that Ford put the 5.slow in the Fox body.
The heads on that stock 5.0 are frm the 70s.. So it isnt really the same. The heads were meant to be on a Truck.. Put a GT40 head and better gears and say goodbye...
@ThunderMonarch Then Honda can put the head from the B16b on the B16a's block, and we're right back where we started. We can play the what if game all day. Give the four banger credit for being in the same league of an American V8 which dominated the streets in the late 80s/early 90s. The USA could never have built an all motor four cylinder setup to run with a Japanese performance 8 cylinder. Since this CRX is a mock of the JDM CRX SiR (B16a), its pretty much stock VS stock.
People Rag about this shit all the time. Mustang will sound better than a 4 banger all day. I have a 89 si and a 95 mustang gt. Crx is great a car but not so much a pussy magnet.
The crx weighs approx 2300lb with 160hp vs 3300lb with 225hp (both stock pwr)
Crx power to weight =14.37
Muzzy power to weight = 14.66
So power to weight is slighly in favour of the crx - along with less drivetrain losses and a smaller frontal area hence a better drag coefficient. As a stock crx runs around mid 15s , The Mustang would run closer to a high 15.
also your forgetting a b16a is at mabey 118 ft. lbs to crank, that mustang is over 300 to crank so they are almost about even, but good info! Face it guys, the little crx with its smart weight and little dohc vtec wonder can do some damage, its just proper engineering from the factory
v8s, but they still have a reasonable power to weight ratio and thats the most important thing! Can't question the strength and reliabily of these engines either...
Import you obviously know your stuff as you seem to had the info above right. People always laugh at the torque of these motors, but thats just it, you dont need crazy amounts of torque in a sub 2000 lb. car thats when you get severe wheel hop, traction issues among other things, and no offense to the foxbody those old 5.0L really are something else, they are dangerous cars even with some simple high quality bolt ons. I considered one before buying my nissan, they are easy to work on (5.0L)
Those old Mustangs are very lucky to manage a high 15 with all 220hp of it's muscle. Typically a factory Crx runs mid to low 15's. Either way a crx is going to beat a stock mustang no question about it.
Not to be rude but get you're facts straight. 87-93 ran a mid 14's stock bone stock. With the crappy ass heads and intake Ford put on them really chokes them down.
@ThunderMonarch From what I've experienced, they are mid 14 to low 15 stock, so I agree with you there. I also agree the stock heads, intake, and the cam suck.. A good head/cam/intake on a 5.0 will net you over 300whp.
The 3rd gen mustangs( fox body) using the Ford 302 windsor engine produced 157hp in 1982 for the GT model , 175hp in 1983 , 200hp in 1986 ford first went to multiport fuel injection, 1987 power jumped to 225hp with the new E7 heads. In 1993 the Ford mustang SVT made 235hp and could manage a high 14.
The one in the race is a 1990 and if its stock will be making about 205hp which equates to a 15 sec car pretty much like the crx is stock. 14s would be with basic bolt ons.
After 20 seconds of full throttle, why does it look like they're only going 90 mph? A bolt-on 5.0 should be doing 115-120 mph by then, and probably the same for a B16A swapped CRX.
fuck mustangs jdm all the way put american muscles in the garbage honda rules my 4 door teg could beat that wit the new ingredients fuck muscle JDM for life
I hope your teg's "new ingredients" are a turbo B16. I easily beat an Integra Type R 200 hp from a stop light and from an 80 mph roll to 130 mph on the highway a while back when my Stang was running high 14s. Don't get cocky unless you're ready to beat a 347 or 351W powered fox. Stock 302s are daily drivers, not race cars. A stock 302 fox with 14 psi can hit 10s @ 125 mph with tires, so be careful what you say. I used to hang out at the illegals with the fox body guys and holllly shiiit.
lol it stock with bolt ons. my friend has a civic hathc with a non vtec integra motor 144 hp with bolt ons and my friend raced it in his v8 mustang and got spanked
lol obviously ur a mustang fan by ur name. and its funny how u mustang guys always think that just because its a 5l with only 215 hp that its the shit cause american muscle rules. this is the new age were weight to power ratio wins. its like saying just because the gt500 mustang has 500 hp doesnt mean it cant get beat by a 300 hp honda.
You have to have power first to benefit from your weight, which is something that your rice buckets doesn't have. American muscles have been and always be superior to your piece of crap imports. And another thing, the gt500 has 500 hp STOCK your honda shit doesn't.
the funny thing is that ur comparing a super car pretty much with a 3000 dollar car. lol trust me if i had a civic with a k20 with some engine mods it would put up a fight
@hellcat320 okaaay aaand?? your trying to say just cause its a smaller motor its suppose to lose??and its a great thing that it won against a 5.0?? n stfu cause i wasnt talking to u...there was no need for u to reply to my post...
well its no supprise it won, and its a smaller motor but waaay ahead of its time in engineering so no supprise it won, and fuck you ill defend any honda from haters like you.
My 1982 Mustang 5.0 with a carburetor and NO computer controls whatsoever gets 20 mpg in town (a town with three million people and stoplights every mile).
600 hp crx would definately run with an 800 hp mustang. but fully built honda, i've seen no more than 700 hp for a street car. fully built mustang i've seen 1100 hp to the wheels that are street cars. no way in hell a 700 hp honda will run with an 1100 hp mustang or any other rwd car with that much power. with that much hp, weight isnt a very big issue. also the front wheel drive doesnt help with traction either.
Trust me, it doesn't make 900 hp. People love to throw around numbers. At the end of the day, about .01% of Hondas on the road today run faster than 13.5 w/o turbo, and about 20% of Mustangs on the road run 12s or faster. Mustangs are a way better route to go for a performance car, and people figure that out as they age and mature, which is why older wealthy guys drive GT500s and vintage stangs and wouldn't be caught dead in a CRX.
True. Stock for stock, it is no doubt way easier to turn a V8 into a 12-second car. 5.0 Mustang, 2500. Couple of mods over a weekend, and you have a 12 second car without even altering the engine itself.
dude. hondas are way cheaper to make fast, and they STILL get good gas mileage. making mustangs fast is for all the people that feel like wasting alot of money for parts and for gas, besides there is a much bigger honda scene then there is with mustangs. popularity rules.
Way cheaper to make fast? I tried looking for a Civic with a B16 swap on craigslist. Even the ones in bad condition with different colored body panels were listed for at least $4,000. I can pick up a 5.0 Stang for $1,500, do a cheap rebuild on the motor, throw a turbo kit and slicks on it and run 10s @ 130 mph lol. The Hondas scene is more popular for teenage kids. People over 20 especially closer to 30 don't bother with that stuff anymore.
dude im buying a civic on craigslist for 2500 that has a b16 with loads of engine mods. full suspension, rims, tires, sway bars and exaust. if you dont believe me i can post the craigslist address on here for you. the honda scene isnt popular with older people over 30 because they grew up with hondas. no one knew then about engine swaps and the possibilities you can have with a honda. the honda scene continues to grow MASSIVELY each year. dont kid yourself.
I won't kid myself. The vast majority of the Honda scene are fag-ass kids with 1988 Civics that they add a coffee can muffler to and race around town with. Very few actually have anything worthwhile. Even a turbo single cam EG hatch( in my videos) can't pull down as good of times as my low compression bolt-on 5.0. I beat my friend's '08 SI with I/H/E/Hondata and 8900 rpm, I beat my friend's '94 coupe B16 swap, i've beaten a Teg type R easily. No thanks, i'd rather keep my Mustang.
dude a single cam blows. you turbo a b series with vtec and all you need is 10 psi to get 300hp. what more could you want. a single cam with 10 psi makes a bit more than 200hp. 300hp in a honda beats just about anything you see goin down the road.
Maybe so. Too bad I never see any turbo Hondas lol. I live in Phoenix, AZ with a population of over 3,000,000 (three million) and if I come across a turbo Honda I am thoroughly shocked. Once in a blue moon there's one and even then it's never a Vtec, always single cam, so again, I don't have a problem squashing any Hondas I come across.
dude that is weird. i live in washington and everywhere you look there are hondas with turbos. i dont even live in that populated of an area and i see several every day. people in Arizona must not like hondas.....
And you're comparing 1960s technology to y2k technology. Honda has 3.2L engines that certainly don't produce 320 hp, so a Honda 5.0L engine would probably wind up being about the same as Ford's 400 hp 5.0L "Coyote" V8 that is currently under construction. How much power did a Honda 1.6 or 1.8 liter engine make in the 1980s? That's a more fair comparison.
well in 1988 you had 160 hp from the b16a and in 1989- 90 185 hp from b16 b so not that bad for a 4 pot, 96 98 jdm b18 200 hp oh and dont forget the 1990 2.9 nsx 278hp , 0 - 60 mph in 5.5 second, 170mph, and as you can see the technology was first put into road cars in 1988 after being in honda motorbikes since 1983 not that new
The B16B Type R motor making 185 hp was in the late '90s, not late '80s. Everything you mentioned is Japanese spec. Since there are no Japanese spec 5.0 liters, let's keep it American. By 1987 the 5.0 was already making 225 hp with wheezy heads and whimpy tuning. The American spec B16A didn't come around till '99 and was making 160 hp with high compression, 4 valves per cylinder, Vtec etc etc etc. I like Honda stuff but don't discredit the 5.0. It's extremely popular for a reason.
if american muscle is cheap to own and tune for a 10 sec pass then how come there's so many slow ones getting whipped by japanese shopping trolleys?
A 5.0 litre Stang is a heap of shit and fucken slow, who are you kidding??!! $1500 worth of performance car won't impress anyone at the drags. i'll just go get a hot dog while you run your 15 - 16 sec pass thanks.
15-16? Last time I was at the drags, a turbo single cam EG hatch was barely in the 14s, like 14.9 all night. The RSX-S that was there didn't even get a 15 second run, it was low 16s @ 90 all night for him. Call a 5.0 slow if you want but mine has done 13.60s for a whopping $3,000. I beat a stripped EG hatch with a LS non-Vtec, cams, intake, exhaust, and a 50 shot SPRAYING on a money race, and I continue to chomp up LS Vtecs, B20 Vtecs, B16s, etc even it DXs, so you can suck it.
I drive a Mustang and one of the things that pisses me off the most is other Mustang drivers. The reason Mustangs get chomped up by slow cars often is because they have high miles, are way out of tune, beat the hell out of, automatic or manual with a HORRIBLE idiot driver, etc. I beat other Mustangs by bus lengths all the time. Come up against someone like me who can drive well and whos car is in decent shape and has a decent tune and it's a different story.
lol if ur talking about the 88-94 mustang gt 5l there slow as fuk unless u did mods to the engine otherwise ull get stomped by any of those cars. hell my d16y8 civic full int and a/c and everything with i/h/e ecu keeps up with a 5l mustang
No, '94 - '98 fourth gen Mustangs with the late 5.0 or early 4.6 are slow. The fox bodie 5.0s are much quicker. And no, your D16 is slow. I have plenty of friends with Hondas, one of them has a '94 Civic coupe that had a Y8. He had the same mods as you and his car was partially stripped, and it was slow, not even close to a stock automatic 5.0. It's got an LS non-vtec now with I/H/E/ecu and still isn't quick. My other friend's '94 coupe with a B16A2 swap was a good race for a stock 5.0.
Most of the 5.0s around are owned by idiots who can't take care of their car let alone drive well, the cars themselves have TONS of miles on them (people actually buy these cars used and start modding with 200,000 miles already on the clock). My old whimpy '82 5.0 eats so many 5.0s it's ridiculous, even ones that should blow my doors off (beat one with a '95 Cobra motor AND a cam, headers, etc by like 6 cars). You just haven't come across a good-running 5.0 with a competent driver.
The american cars are very nice and fast on the staight, yes but...
U only want bigger engine... check the hp/liter of the crx and check the mustang's!!xD And what about the corners? go to tsukuba with your mustang and make less of 1 minute at the track.(time made by 250hp J's Crx, and could mark a lower time).
You have more HP/Liter, the Mustang has more HP PERIOD. Check out "Mustang Drift" and tell me Mustang's can't hang. I love import and muscle, but get off Import's nuts!
I doubt you have ever owned one. I own one that gets me good gas mileage on the highway, the same as a 2000 v6 automatic toyota tacoma. And so far it has been more than reliable, but like I said what the fuck do you know, you don't own one.
thats good work.. my old crx dusted a 5.0 stang from a start and roll.. from a roll i took him by like 2.5 3 cars.. there fucking junk just like the rest of them.. muscle cars aren't bad its just the stupid fucking people who own them.. check my video of my old rex out.. i got a gsr hatch now fully built (NOW) with supertech shit now but still..
stupid ricers, there was a ricer recently that was driving "fast" and the he crashed into a McDonalds around the corner from my house lmao it was great...he had the body kit, the wing and the fart can muffler and all too....
the B16 has headers and CAI. just get a 300 $ set of gears like 3:73 and you will have a different story. HP/weight is what will determine how fast a car is, but in this case how about you compare stock for stock.
i have full exhaust and gears on my 88 ill take you on any day
My crx has a b16a swap with headers, 2.5 inch exhaust, p28 ecu,msd ignition, and intake and I kill 5.0's all day long. Big difference in power to weight ratio. A crx that weighs 1800lbs with 200 hp compared to a stang that weighs at least 2800lbs with 225 hp. do the math. If that crx is done right it'll run 12's easy.
mustangs dont weight 2800lbs i fucking wish...lol they most weight over 3100 lbs..
i smoke crx with mine and i have a system on the back..being 2-15 kickers...not am i only fast but loud 2...plus i can still ride 4 bitches in it...lol..turbo kit comming soon....your wortst knigthmare..a turbocharged v8..lol...i used to have a crx but it got stolen..it was fast but noting compare to the 5.0
you guys are so full of shit...that civic probably has no interior what so ever..and that GT is probably about as stock as you can get...with a terrible driver....In the first video...he clearly missed 3rd..and he was actually leading in this one....until the end...Put that stang in my hands and i would wax that civic's ass.
People whos hating on Imports and talking all there shit that Imports are weak, look at that MUSCLE CAR, can't even hang with the IMPORTS. Plus the top end on that Mustang isnt even pulling at all. Thats SO EMBRASSING!!! MUSCLE CARS SUCKS!
Common man that was a really good race, those are the lighter mustangs too, you have to give props to that crx. That stock b16 is only puttin out 170 hp max.... so..
i guess thats good then? not sure though. i ran with a crx on the highway and had him from 2nd until i maxed out at maybe 205km/hr bone fukking stock 5.0LX. Then he SLOWLY passed me while my friend was yelling at me to go faster and i was like "MY FUKKING FOOT IS ALL THE WAY DOWN!!!"
after we pulled over, he said he had b18, flywheel, clutch stage 2 and headers.
@mississauga5litre modded vs unmodded? lol that dont mean crap dude ones a 5 liter V8 the other is a non turbo 4 cylender. who won? exactly. Score one for Imports.
I have a Stock B16A in a CRX all Obd-1 and i kill mustangs all day everyday. Just cuz u got 8 cylinders doesnt mean ur quick. And sohc are quick too. Dont underestimate them.
Looks like a close race to me, why all the shit talkin? You have a stock Stang, vs a CRX with a swap, why not do a swap with the stang? then who'll be crying? either way, I give credit where it's due, I owned a 90 DX and I swapped a b16 into it, it was fast, i beat stangs, but put 2 grand into my civic or into a stang id put my money on the stang hands down in a 1/4 mile race
I own a 1990 Mustang GT and I have spent less than 1000 dollars on modifications and I run 13's. I personally have no problem with Hondas, and in this cause the Honda won. Credit where credit is due. Either way, both cars are good for speed on a budget. Just because the Honda won, I don't see why that makes the Mustang a "POS."
this movie is tainted that guy in the 5.0 must not know how to drive mainly that top end of the mustang would just keep going not suprised to see one more miss guiding video no offense american cars turn it just takes real men to drive them
if you built a honda motor and all you do is go straight, you belong in an american car as i respect american cars because this is what they are made for! TO GO STRAIGHT!!! if your tuning a honda to beat a v8, why? the honda is made for a different type of race and stay away from them v8s because all you do is give a bad name for hondas!
its not about hypin up the b16, its all about how you balance the motor out! b16 is made for the crx, it comes stock with the crx in japan and is just well balanced! take the crx on a straight, yeah its a little fast because of its power to weight ratio! but will get smoked by some high horsepower muscle cars! take the crx on some canyon runs, yeah, it still hits turns yet pulls out of them just as quick as it hits straights!
15.5 ....a stock CRX Si with 108hp does 15.5 so maybe you have no vtec...or you don t know how to drive :P check out my other videos...civic ef Ls/vtec vs 2004 wrx...you can hear the clutch is really used but the civic ran 14.2 a couple weeks ago!
maybe that one is slow but there are some outhrere that will make your piece of shit ricer look like a rc car...lol.....i have a 5.0 and i used to have a crx...you just got to love that torque for those hills being someting that those 4 bangers lack....im packing what your lacking....peace...
Both cars are good for making cheap horsepower, I don't own either so I won't say which is better. I feel they are evenly matched when the crx has the dohc vtec b/c of weight. And don't be so quick to comment that mustangs are not reliable...those v8's can take a beating. don't be like whiteyonewelfare spewing comments w/o thinking...lol.
yeah!I have the b16a since 3 years...made it rev 9200RPM with stock springs valves and retainers...and it will last many more years...i raced a '96 trans AM LT1 285hp automatic...and i was in front of him from 0 to 125mph!
the mustang has ben here since the 60's so what the fuck are you talking about...plus when your timing belt goes, there goes your fucking valves..lol.....and those cars will run faster with less...you win some you loose some but a fully modded stang with all the right parts will always smoke that 4 banger.if b16 are so bad ass how come you dont put one on a truck .lol.thers no replacemnt for displacement....peace...
the crx has only a 1.6L DOHC VTEC(160hp)...no supercharger!!...A mustang gt with 100hp of NOS will go high 12s....not 11s...i did 14.62@97mph with a tank full of gaz and no good tires...2.4 of 60 feet!
wow thats pretty fast for a stock b16 in a crx...i have a 98 jdm ITR motor in an EG and i only hit a 14.3@ 99mph with a 2.4 60foot time also lol. crx is much lighter also tho
is that low 14s with slicks? cuz ive done 13.2 with slicks also...but street tires... youre not gonna get much traction...when my vtec kicks the tires break loose...and thats with falken azenis tires
It might have just been a very sticky strip, it was quite late on in the day afer a lot of runs... Still, I would have expected it to be a but quicker, but hey!
...exactly how much juice are we talking about?? and with a ford...are you only gonna hit 11's one time...before its to the junk yard?? hehe.. i doubt you can hit 11s with 100 shot and nos...hitting 11s is harder then that...trust me..i know from experience.
this is some ol bullshit, in real life no one will spend 10+grand to make a fucking 106hp car run worth a damn. Give a 5.0 the juice bottle(about 200bucks all together) and you have a 11.5s (1/4 mile) street car. Imma call uncle ben and tell him stop making that supercharged rice.
that honda is not that much faster.... pretty sad >.> the 5.0L were wicked slow unless u did an engine swap
xmodrock 6 months ago
the stang was stock of course a honda is gunna smoke it if they dump money in it for a shitload of mods just to keep up a v8 if the mustang had the same amount of money to dump into it thiers no way the honda wins
01manuelcasas 6 months ago
crx for ever (part 2)!!!!!!!!!!!
MrAlexdive 9 months ago
@MrAlexdive dude. the honda won by 3/4 of a car.if the cars ran exactly the same you can win by 3/4 of a car just by getting off the line .010 sec quicker.and the stang is stock. go race a mustang with a 460 swap in it.
MegaRussell12 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck a mustang hondas allways win
ba84mustang 10 months ago
fuck a mustang hondas allways win
ba84mustang 10 months ago
my friend has a chipped b16a with headers and a pulley,straight 3 inch exhaust and its way faser than this crx,aind its way faster than a stock 5.0,he keeps up with my 5.0 which has pulleys and 373 rear gears,and a intake so tht crx in this video is fairly slow if a 5.0 can keep up by half a car length,or maybe you lost traction because you shoulda smoked him
MIGHTYSAMINYOURFACE 1 year ago
You guys kill me. Getting an old ass stock 5.0 and use it as a bench mark. Now go find one thats close to the same power to weight ratio and whip his ass. Everyone knows that a stock 5.0 is fairly slow so wouldnt that make your car a lil faster than a fairly slow car. That shit aint worth bragging about. Just saying.
getyourballzup 1 year ago
congratulations! you beat a tired 5.0 v8 from 1980 by half a car length. how do you feel?
94z28derk 1 year ago
@94z28derk He probably feels great, especially since the B16 is a 20+ year old motor. The 5.0 and the B16 are from the same era. Honda first put B16s in 1988 CRX Si-Rs in Japan. Simply put, that 4 banger can rock with V8s from the same era. Not Honda's fault that Ford put the 5.slow in the Fox body.
vsmith3rd 1 year ago
@vsmith3rd
The heads on that stock 5.0 are frm the 70s.. So it isnt really the same. The heads were meant to be on a Truck.. Put a GT40 head and better gears and say goodbye...
ThunderMonarch 1 year ago
@ThunderMonarch Then Honda can put the head from the B16b on the B16a's block, and we're right back where we started. We can play the what if game all day. Give the four banger credit for being in the same league of an American V8 which dominated the streets in the late 80s/early 90s. The USA could never have built an all motor four cylinder setup to run with a Japanese performance 8 cylinder. Since this CRX is a mock of the JDM CRX SiR (B16a), its pretty much stock VS stock.
vsmith3rd 1 year ago
can someone help me out im deciding wat engine to swap should i get a b16, b18, or h22a
fifafan1 1 year ago
People Rag about this shit all the time. Mustang will sound better than a 4 banger all day. I have a 89 si and a 95 mustang gt. Crx is great a car but not so much a pussy magnet.
halo2extremist 1 year ago
cant wait till my crx del sol ,is eating up v8s too
350zgeo 1 year ago
Honda is much better he still won stock with a engine a 1/3 of the size, i want this in my crx
Brendon00000 1 year ago
lol except the CRX will get 30+ mpg the Mustang lucky to pull 15 mpg both with conservative driving habits :)
angelofdeth80 2 years ago
The crx weighs approx 2300lb with 160hp vs 3300lb with 225hp (both stock pwr)
Crx power to weight =14.37
Muzzy power to weight = 14.66
So power to weight is slighly in favour of the crx - along with less drivetrain losses and a smaller frontal area hence a better drag coefficient. As a stock crx runs around mid 15s , The Mustang would run closer to a high 15.
IMPORTMUSCLECAR 2 years ago
How'd you get the 1/4 mile et? That's interesting. I like it.
CarefullySleek 2 years ago
also your forgetting a b16a is at mabey 118 ft. lbs to crank, that mustang is over 300 to crank so they are almost about even, but good info! Face it guys, the little crx with its smart weight and little dohc vtec wonder can do some damage, its just proper engineering from the factory
longboardguy 2 years ago
@longboardguy
I agree. They may lack in torque against
v8s, but they still have a reasonable power to weight ratio and thats the most important thing! Can't question the strength and reliabily of these engines either...
IMPORTMUSCLECAR 2 years ago
Import you obviously know your stuff as you seem to had the info above right. People always laugh at the torque of these motors, but thats just it, you dont need crazy amounts of torque in a sub 2000 lb. car thats when you get severe wheel hop, traction issues among other things, and no offense to the foxbody those old 5.0L really are something else, they are dangerous cars even with some simple high quality bolt ons. I considered one before buying my nissan, they are easy to work on (5.0L)
longboardguy 2 years ago
nice tech talk. props dude.
wasian538 2 years ago
@IMPORTMUSCLECAR my stock 88 gt ran 14.9. try again.
MegaRussell12 7 months ago
if the crx beat the 5.0 then it must be running 13's or low 14's... cause i could swear these 5.0 can run atleast mid 14's stock.
AlphaOmega503 2 years ago
@ AlphaOmega503
Those old Mustangs are very lucky to manage a high 15 with all 220hp of it's muscle. Typically a factory Crx runs mid to low 15's. Either way a crx is going to beat a stock mustang no question about it.
IMPORTMUSCLECAR 2 years ago
Not to be rude but get you're facts straight. 87-93 ran a mid 14's stock bone stock. With the crappy ass heads and intake Ford put on them really chokes them down.
ThunderMonarch 2 years ago
@ThunderMonarch From what I've experienced, they are mid 14 to low 15 stock, so I agree with you there. I also agree the stock heads, intake, and the cam suck.. A good head/cam/intake on a 5.0 will net you over 300whp.
jjsk8erkid 2 years ago
AlphaOmega503
The 3rd gen mustangs( fox body) using the Ford 302 windsor engine produced 157hp in 1982 for the GT model , 175hp in 1983 , 200hp in 1986 ford first went to multiport fuel injection, 1987 power jumped to 225hp with the new E7 heads. In 1993 the Ford mustang SVT made 235hp and could manage a high 14.
The one in the race is a 1990 and if its stock will be making about 205hp which equates to a 15 sec car pretty much like the crx is stock. 14s would be with basic bolt ons.
IMPORTMUSCLECAR 2 years ago
After 20 seconds of full throttle, why does it look like they're only going 90 mph? A bolt-on 5.0 should be doing 115-120 mph by then, and probably the same for a B16A swapped CRX.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
fuck mustangs jdm all the way put american muscles in the garbage honda rules my 4 door teg could beat that wit the new ingredients fuck muscle JDM for life
22jdmteggy 2 years ago
I hope your teg's "new ingredients" are a turbo B16. I easily beat an Integra Type R 200 hp from a stop light and from an 80 mph roll to 130 mph on the highway a while back when my Stang was running high 14s. Don't get cocky unless you're ready to beat a 347 or 351W powered fox. Stock 302s are daily drivers, not race cars. A stock 302 fox with 14 psi can hit 10s @ 125 mph with tires, so be careful what you say. I used to hang out at the illegals with the fox body guys and holllly shiiit.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
I think that was a pretty good race between muscle and rice.
Isaac3432 2 years ago
i luv my b16 even more lmfao...
94civiccolumbus 2 years ago
Bullshit thats not a stock b16a. no need to fucking lie.
MDC33147 2 years ago
headers,exhaust,SRI,chipped vtec 5200 redline: 9200...engine internals stock!... power/weight ratio 170hp/1950pounds==> 225hp/3300pounds
ElmoCRX 2 years ago 4
That's not stock, you fucking ricer!!!
nustangchristian 2 years ago
lol it stock with bolt ons. my friend has a civic hathc with a non vtec integra motor 144 hp with bolt ons and my friend raced it in his v8 mustang and got spanked
tragusaur 2 years ago
Your full of bullshit!!!
nustangchristian 2 years ago
ok fine dont believe me. i have no reason to lie. what i saw is what i saw.
tragusaur 2 years ago
YOU SAW SHIT, THAT'S WHAT YOU SAW.
nustangchristian 2 years ago
lol obviously ur a mustang fan by ur name. and its funny how u mustang guys always think that just because its a 5l with only 215 hp that its the shit cause american muscle rules. this is the new age were weight to power ratio wins. its like saying just because the gt500 mustang has 500 hp doesnt mean it cant get beat by a 300 hp honda.
tragusaur 2 years ago
You have to have power first to benefit from your weight, which is something that your rice buckets doesn't have. American muscles have been and always be superior to your piece of crap imports. And another thing, the gt500 has 500 hp STOCK your honda shit doesn't.
nustangchristian 2 years ago
the funny thing is that ur comparing a super car pretty much with a 3000 dollar car. lol trust me if i had a civic with a k20 with some engine mods it would put up a fight
tragusaur 2 years ago
a 2000 dollar 5.0L is a super car? i hope im reading this wrong.
StopTheMelting 2 years ago 2
@ElmoCRX i assume you ment 8200 red line right?
driverdriver1 1 year ago
@ElmoCRX ppl just cant face the fact that a lil 4 cylinder B16A will eat a V8 in a crx any day
Cancer2707 1 year ago
@Cancer2707 never dude its all about power to weight ratio,
dbl0ck13 1 year ago
@ElmoCRX ta oublier les lbs de torque mon vieux
Gauthier808 8 months ago
quit crying its a b16a
hellcat320 1 year ago
@hellcat320 okaaay aaand?? your trying to say just cause its a smaller motor its suppose to lose??and its a great thing that it won against a 5.0?? n stfu cause i wasnt talking to u...there was no need for u to reply to my post...
MDC33147 1 year ago
well its no supprise it won, and its a smaller motor but waaay ahead of its time in engineering so no supprise it won, and fuck you ill defend any honda from haters like you.
hellcat320 1 year ago
Comment removed
3O2MuStAnG 2 years ago
ive never heard of a muscle guy caring about gas mileage in an old stang lol...
Wojoray 3 years ago 2
My 1982 Mustang 5.0 with a carburetor and NO computer controls whatsoever gets 20 mpg in town (a town with three million people and stoplights every mile).
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
I have no clue what my mileage is. Driving to school and back is too short to really worry about it.
Wojoray 2 years ago
stock for stock the hondas gonna be faster 'cause of the weight. built up though, thats a different story.
RGiggi86Mustang50 3 years ago
Built for built would yield the same results "cause of the weight." 600 hp in the crx would keep up with a 800+ hp rustang. Trust me, i have seen it.
ITRlover1 3 years ago
600 hp crx would definately run with an 800 hp mustang. but fully built honda, i've seen no more than 700 hp for a street car. fully built mustang i've seen 1100 hp to the wheels that are street cars. no way in hell a 700 hp honda will run with an 1100 hp mustang or any other rwd car with that much power. with that much hp, weight isnt a very big issue. also the front wheel drive doesnt help with traction either.
RGiggi86Mustang50 3 years ago
Look up CFT's civic SI.. Its streetable and has 900+ horsepower from what i read. It breaks into the 9's
ITRlover1 3 years ago
are my comments goin thu?
RGiggi86Mustang50 3 years ago
Trust me, it doesn't make 900 hp. People love to throw around numbers. At the end of the day, about .01% of Hondas on the road today run faster than 13.5 w/o turbo, and about 20% of Mustangs on the road run 12s or faster. Mustangs are a way better route to go for a performance car, and people figure that out as they age and mature, which is why older wealthy guys drive GT500s and vintage stangs and wouldn't be caught dead in a CRX.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
True. Stock for stock, it is no doubt way easier to turn a V8 into a 12-second car. 5.0 Mustang, 2500. Couple of mods over a weekend, and you have a 12 second car without even altering the engine itself.
MassiveLemon 2 years ago 3
dude. hondas are way cheaper to make fast, and they STILL get good gas mileage. making mustangs fast is for all the people that feel like wasting alot of money for parts and for gas, besides there is a much bigger honda scene then there is with mustangs. popularity rules.
DestroyerOnHalo 2 years ago
Way cheaper to make fast? I tried looking for a Civic with a B16 swap on craigslist. Even the ones in bad condition with different colored body panels were listed for at least $4,000. I can pick up a 5.0 Stang for $1,500, do a cheap rebuild on the motor, throw a turbo kit and slicks on it and run 10s @ 130 mph lol. The Hondas scene is more popular for teenage kids. People over 20 especially closer to 30 don't bother with that stuff anymore.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
dude im buying a civic on craigslist for 2500 that has a b16 with loads of engine mods. full suspension, rims, tires, sway bars and exaust. if you dont believe me i can post the craigslist address on here for you. the honda scene isnt popular with older people over 30 because they grew up with hondas. no one knew then about engine swaps and the possibilities you can have with a honda. the honda scene continues to grow MASSIVELY each year. dont kid yourself.
DestroyerOnHalo 2 years ago
I won't kid myself. The vast majority of the Honda scene are fag-ass kids with 1988 Civics that they add a coffee can muffler to and race around town with. Very few actually have anything worthwhile. Even a turbo single cam EG hatch( in my videos) can't pull down as good of times as my low compression bolt-on 5.0. I beat my friend's '08 SI with I/H/E/Hondata and 8900 rpm, I beat my friend's '94 coupe B16 swap, i've beaten a Teg type R easily. No thanks, i'd rather keep my Mustang.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
dude a single cam blows. you turbo a b series with vtec and all you need is 10 psi to get 300hp. what more could you want. a single cam with 10 psi makes a bit more than 200hp. 300hp in a honda beats just about anything you see goin down the road.
DestroyerOnHalo 2 years ago
Maybe so. Too bad I never see any turbo Hondas lol. I live in Phoenix, AZ with a population of over 3,000,000 (three million) and if I come across a turbo Honda I am thoroughly shocked. Once in a blue moon there's one and even then it's never a Vtec, always single cam, so again, I don't have a problem squashing any Hondas I come across.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
dude that is weird. i live in washington and everywhere you look there are hondas with turbos. i dont even live in that populated of an area and i see several every day. people in Arizona must not like hondas.....
DestroyerOnHalo 2 years ago
all i can say is you are all comparing s 5 litre against 1.6 litres if honda ever make a 5 litre car we will see what happens
madmangazza 2 years ago
And you're comparing 1960s technology to y2k technology. Honda has 3.2L engines that certainly don't produce 320 hp, so a Honda 5.0L engine would probably wind up being about the same as Ford's 400 hp 5.0L "Coyote" V8 that is currently under construction. How much power did a Honda 1.6 or 1.8 liter engine make in the 1980s? That's a more fair comparison.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
well in 1988 you had 160 hp from the b16a and in 1989- 90 185 hp from b16 b so not that bad for a 4 pot, 96 98 jdm b18 200 hp oh and dont forget the 1990 2.9 nsx 278hp , 0 - 60 mph in 5.5 second, 170mph, and as you can see the technology was first put into road cars in 1988 after being in honda motorbikes since 1983 not that new
madmangazza 2 years ago
The B16B Type R motor making 185 hp was in the late '90s, not late '80s. Everything you mentioned is Japanese spec. Since there are no Japanese spec 5.0 liters, let's keep it American. By 1987 the 5.0 was already making 225 hp with wheezy heads and whimpy tuning. The American spec B16A didn't come around till '99 and was making 160 hp with high compression, 4 valves per cylinder, Vtec etc etc etc. I like Honda stuff but don't discredit the 5.0. It's extremely popular for a reason.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
Fail. The B16 was available in the 1994 del Sol when 5.0s were still in the slowstang GT.
vsmith3rd 2 years ago
Too bad even a 1994 pig GT was faster than a 1994 Del Sol lol.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
Haha, that was your nanna driving that crx!
if american muscle is cheap to own and tune for a 10 sec pass then how come there's so many slow ones getting whipped by japanese shopping trolleys?
A 5.0 litre Stang is a heap of shit and fucken slow, who are you kidding??!! $1500 worth of performance car won't impress anyone at the drags. i'll just go get a hot dog while you run your 15 - 16 sec pass thanks.
kyledagg 2 years ago
15-16? Last time I was at the drags, a turbo single cam EG hatch was barely in the 14s, like 14.9 all night. The RSX-S that was there didn't even get a 15 second run, it was low 16s @ 90 all night for him. Call a 5.0 slow if you want but mine has done 13.60s for a whopping $3,000. I beat a stripped EG hatch with a LS non-Vtec, cams, intake, exhaust, and a 50 shot SPRAYING on a money race, and I continue to chomp up LS Vtecs, B20 Vtecs, B16s, etc even it DXs, so you can suck it.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
I drive a Mustang and one of the things that pisses me off the most is other Mustang drivers. The reason Mustangs get chomped up by slow cars often is because they have high miles, are way out of tune, beat the hell out of, automatic or manual with a HORRIBLE idiot driver, etc. I beat other Mustangs by bus lengths all the time. Come up against someone like me who can drive well and whos car is in decent shape and has a decent tune and it's a different story.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
lol if ur talking about the 88-94 mustang gt 5l there slow as fuk unless u did mods to the engine otherwise ull get stomped by any of those cars. hell my d16y8 civic full int and a/c and everything with i/h/e ecu keeps up with a 5l mustang
tragusaur 2 years ago
No, '94 - '98 fourth gen Mustangs with the late 5.0 or early 4.6 are slow. The fox bodie 5.0s are much quicker. And no, your D16 is slow. I have plenty of friends with Hondas, one of them has a '94 Civic coupe that had a Y8. He had the same mods as you and his car was partially stripped, and it was slow, not even close to a stock automatic 5.0. It's got an LS non-vtec now with I/H/E/ecu and still isn't quick. My other friend's '94 coupe with a B16A2 swap was a good race for a stock 5.0.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
Most of the 5.0s around are owned by idiots who can't take care of their car let alone drive well, the cars themselves have TONS of miles on them (people actually buy these cars used and start modding with 200,000 miles already on the clock). My old whimpy '82 5.0 eats so many 5.0s it's ridiculous, even ones that should blow my doors off (beat one with a '95 Cobra motor AND a cam, headers, etc by like 6 cars). You just haven't come across a good-running 5.0 with a competent driver.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
thats a nice stretch to race....
xcworrior 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
piece of shit mustang
uzaqq 3 years ago
piece of shit CRX
nustangchristian 2 years ago
indestructible 306... looool what a jerkk!
The american cars are very nice and fast on the staight, yes but...
U only want bigger engine... check the hp/liter of the crx and check the mustang's!!xD And what about the corners? go to tsukuba with your mustang and make less of 1 minute at the track.(time made by 250hp J's Crx, and could mark a lower time).
belmont125 3 years ago
You have more HP/Liter, the Mustang has more HP PERIOD. Check out "Mustang Drift" and tell me Mustang's can't hang. I love import and muscle, but get off Import's nuts!
MassiveLemon 2 years ago
Power to weight ratio my friend. Lighter car, bigger engine. Doesn't make sense putting the opposite now does it?
RanCRX 3 years ago 4
I doubt you have ever owned one. I own one that gets me good gas mileage on the highway, the same as a 2000 v6 automatic toyota tacoma. And so far it has been more than reliable, but like I said what the fuck do you know, you don't own one.
bbpKidd13 4 years ago
my rex was bone stock too.. only had a b16 motor thats it
malibubarbiie1111 4 years ago
this is my girls name but she post my videos up
malibubarbiie1111 4 years ago
thats good work.. my old crx dusted a 5.0 stang from a start and roll.. from a roll i took him by like 2.5 3 cars.. there fucking junk just like the rest of them.. muscle cars aren't bad its just the stupid fucking people who own them.. check my video of my old rex out.. i got a gsr hatch now fully built (NOW) with supertech shit now but still..
malibubarbiie1111 4 years ago
tHatS hOw we CRX owNerS rOll!! beatiN mUstaNgS like nOtHinG
aGtHefResHCRXbOy 4 years ago
wow that was a tight race
mccloudyd 4 years ago
Nice run!
TurboStang351 4 years ago
sweet run bro i love doing that in my ef9 b16 built
ef9hatchy 4 years ago
honda power
dxtosirex 4 years ago
Wow!! how fuking ignorant these ricers are. No wonder most people hate ricers.
willnav 4 years ago
stupid ricers, there was a ricer recently that was driving "fast" and the he crashed into a McDonalds around the corner from my house lmao it was great...he had the body kit, the wing and the fart can muffler and all too....
JimmyBoyGT 4 years ago
just you dont have 1... dont be an ass...
tsjkj 4 years ago 2
i don't have what? a car? i do i have 92 Mustang GT 5.0 HO that would dust u rice burners...
JimmyBoyGT 4 years ago
the B16 has headers and CAI. just get a 300 $ set of gears like 3:73 and you will have a different story. HP/weight is what will determine how fast a car is, but in this case how about you compare stock for stock.
i have full exhaust and gears on my 88 ill take you on any day
crocop427 4 years ago
My crx has a b16a swap with headers, 2.5 inch exhaust, p28 ecu,msd ignition, and intake and I kill 5.0's all day long. Big difference in power to weight ratio. A crx that weighs 1800lbs with 200 hp compared to a stang that weighs at least 2800lbs with 225 hp. do the math. If that crx is done right it'll run 12's easy.
Lefort6 4 years ago
mustangs dont weight 2800lbs i fucking wish...lol they most weight over 3100 lbs..
i smoke crx with mine and i have a system on the back..being 2-15 kickers...not am i only fast but loud 2...plus i can still ride 4 bitches in it...lol..turbo kit comming soon....your wortst knigthmare..a turbocharged v8..lol...i used to have a crx but it got stolen..it was fast but noting compare to the 5.0
indestructible306 4 years ago
you guys are so full of shit...that civic probably has no interior what so ever..and that GT is probably about as stock as you can get...with a terrible driver....In the first video...he clearly missed 3rd..and he was actually leading in this one....until the end...Put that stang in my hands and i would wax that civic's ass.
steeda1984 4 years ago
wah wah wah the mustang lost so fuc off with your bullshit to some mustang video
longboardguy 4 years ago
you're all retarded. A CRX with a B16 may have less power than a mustang but it weighs lighter. you guys need to understand power to weight ratio.
analogueorange 4 years ago 2
People whos hating on Imports and talking all there shit that Imports are weak, look at that MUSCLE CAR, can't even hang with the IMPORTS. Plus the top end on that Mustang isnt even pulling at all. Thats SO EMBRASSING!!! MUSCLE CARS SUCKS!
iLOVEmySOHC 5 years ago
Your comparing stock to modded pal
TurboStang351 4 years ago 2
Common man that was a really good race, those are the lighter mustangs too, you have to give props to that crx. That stock b16 is only puttin out 170 hp max.... so..
Mikew995 4 years ago
HAHAHAH everyone here applauding the CRX forgets one fukking simple thing:
THE STANG IS STOCK! DUH
lets do some mods to it and have a rematch. i mean it wasnt like the CRX just removed his air intake... it has a fukking B16!!!
And he didnt RAPE the stang... he won by a fukking pube
LMAO waste of my time
mississauga5litre 5 years ago
The stang also has 3.125 times the displacement...
phobiarg 5 years ago
your point?
modded vs un-modded... simple
mississauga5litre 5 years ago
the b16a motor is stock...only headers and CAI,as the mustang!
ElmoCRX 5 years ago
i guess thats good then? not sure though. i ran with a crx on the highway and had him from 2nd until i maxed out at maybe 205km/hr bone fukking stock 5.0LX. Then he SLOWLY passed me while my friend was yelling at me to go faster and i was like "MY FUKKING FOOT IS ALL THE WAY DOWN!!!"
after we pulled over, he said he had b18, flywheel, clutch stage 2 and headers.
mississauga5litre 5 years ago
@mississauga5litre modded vs unmodded? lol that dont mean crap dude ones a 5 liter V8 the other is a non turbo 4 cylender. who won? exactly. Score one for Imports.
Tuned4speed08 1 year ago
stangs are very overated very! but there not all pos's but im not impressed by ne means.
bigpopaj369 5 years ago
but still, that's a 4.7 or somthing rounded it out to 5.0 to look nice... it's still 3 point something liters more that that 1.6 vtec!!!
proud of what! u got more but STILL CAN'T BEAT less!!! people deez days (reffering to me to)
theredejvtec 5 years ago
I have a Stock B16A in a CRX all Obd-1 and i kill mustangs all day everyday. Just cuz u got 8 cylinders doesnt mean ur quick. And sohc are quick too. Dont underestimate them.
syndicateimage 5 years ago
roushe+shelby=good all other stangs=pos
tegpower589 5 years ago
Looks like a close race to me, why all the shit talkin? You have a stock Stang, vs a CRX with a swap, why not do a swap with the stang? then who'll be crying? either way, I give credit where it's due, I owned a 90 DX and I swapped a b16 into it, it was fast, i beat stangs, but put 2 grand into my civic or into a stang id put my money on the stang hands down in a 1/4 mile race
frank77dk 5 years ago
I own a 1990 Mustang GT and I have spent less than 1000 dollars on modifications and I run 13's. I personally have no problem with Hondas, and in this cause the Honda won. Credit where credit is due. Either way, both cars are good for speed on a budget. Just because the Honda won, I don't see why that makes the Mustang a "POS."
wildhourses 5 years ago 3
this movie is tainted that guy in the 5.0 must not know how to drive mainly that top end of the mustang would just keep going not suprised to see one more miss guiding video no offense american cars turn it just takes real men to drive them
jsmoyer 5 years ago
if you built a honda motor and all you do is go straight, you belong in an american car as i respect american cars because this is what they are made for! TO GO STRAIGHT!!! if your tuning a honda to beat a v8, why? the honda is made for a different type of race and stay away from them v8s because all you do is give a bad name for hondas!
9720680 5 years ago
its not about hypin up the b16, its all about how you balance the motor out! b16 is made for the crx, it comes stock with the crx in japan and is just well balanced! take the crx on a straight, yeah its a little fast because of its power to weight ratio! but will get smoked by some high horsepower muscle cars! take the crx on some canyon runs, yeah, it still hits turns yet pulls out of them just as quick as it hits straights!
9720680 5 years ago
b16's are so overated...my sohc v will wax b16's all day!
chadivaj 5 years ago
b16 owns you all
cns4ever 5 years ago
Civics are gay.
Ricers favourite choice.
adm7007 5 years ago
Good vid, and i have always like both cars, but a crx b16 on a 100shot i believe hits mid to low 13's.
Contender25 5 years ago
15.5 ....a stock CRX Si with 108hp does 15.5 so maybe you have no vtec...or you don t know how to drive :P check out my other videos...civic ef Ls/vtec vs 2004 wrx...you can hear the clutch is really used but the civic ran 14.2 a couple weeks ago!
ElmoCRX 5 years ago
my b16a crx is quite fast also, but i only ran a 15.5 with it!!!
mahman 5 years ago
5.SLOW ! lol ,pos ford !
derrickddp 5 years ago
maybe that one is slow but there are some outhrere that will make your piece of shit ricer look like a rc car...lol.....i have a 5.0 and i used to have a crx...you just got to love that torque for those hills being someting that those 4 bangers lack....im packing what your lacking....peace...
indestructible306 4 years ago 3
Both cars are good for making cheap horsepower, I don't own either so I won't say which is better. I feel they are evenly matched when the crx has the dohc vtec b/c of weight. And don't be so quick to comment that mustangs are not reliable...those v8's can take a beating. don't be like whiteyonewelfare spewing comments w/o thinking...lol.
stopcrazypp 5 years ago
yeah!I have the b16a since 3 years...made it rev 9200RPM with stock springs valves and retainers...and it will last many more years...i raced a '96 trans AM LT1 285hp automatic...and i was in front of him from 0 to 125mph!
ElmoCRX 5 years ago
hell yeah i gotta b16a sir2 crx and that thing will woop stangs all day and outlive it by like 10 years
cyberjef2000 5 years ago
the mustang has ben here since the 60's so what the fuck are you talking about...plus when your timing belt goes, there goes your fucking valves..lol.....and those cars will run faster with less...you win some you loose some but a fully modded stang with all the right parts will always smoke that 4 banger.if b16 are so bad ass how come you dont put one on a truck .lol.thers no replacemnt for displacement....peace...
indestructible306 4 years ago
i have a jdm b16a crx and it don't cost 10grand to fix. u need only 1grand. i smoke mustang all day long.
dacrxboi 5 years ago
the crx has only a 1.6L DOHC VTEC(160hp)...no supercharger!!...A mustang gt with 100hp of NOS will go high 12s....not 11s...i did 14.62@97mph with a tank full of gaz and no good tires...2.4 of 60 feet!
ElmoCRX 5 years ago
wow thats pretty fast for a stock b16 in a crx...i have a 98 jdm ITR motor in an EG and i only hit a 14.3@ 99mph with a 2.4 60foot time also lol. crx is much lighter also tho
and i have 50 more horses then you
tommieboi707 5 years ago
You sure you've got n integra TYPE R motor, and not just one of the shitty integra 1.8's? I've done low 14's in my near stock eg b16...
PunterCam 5 years ago
is that low 14s with slicks? cuz ive done 13.2 with slicks also...but street tires... youre not gonna get much traction...when my vtec kicks the tires break loose...and thats with falken azenis tires
tommieboi707 5 years ago
It might have just been a very sticky strip, it was quite late on in the day afer a lot of runs... Still, I would have expected it to be a but quicker, but hey!
PunterCam 5 years ago
...exactly how much juice are we talking about?? and with a ford...are you only gonna hit 11's one time...before its to the junk yard?? hehe.. i doubt you can hit 11s with 100 shot and nos...hitting 11s is harder then that...trust me..i know from experience.
tommieboi707 5 years ago
this is some ol bullshit, in real life no one will spend 10+grand to make a fucking 106hp car run worth a damn. Give a 5.0 the juice bottle(about 200bucks all together) and you have a 11.5s (1/4 mile) street car. Imma call uncle ben and tell him stop making that supercharged rice.
whiteyonwelfare 5 years ago