That was around 18 tons (or around 40'000 pounds) TNT-equivalent. Shot in september 2001 in the former Nevada Test Site, at BEEF. Search for "watusi experiment" if you want to know more.
3000 kt = 6 billion pounds lol. So yeah as everyone has said and the original poster acknowledged, that's not correct. So, how much is it really? no idea
the bomb that was dropped on hiroshima was around 13 kilotons, so imagine a bomb 43 times as powerful as this one. A normal nuke now can be as much as 2-3 megatons (or 10000 times this one)
watch at the top of the screen as soon as the intro ends, you cansee something fallout of the sky before it explodes. I think that was a missle explosion.
... Obviously ... the point was that it was on a scale up there with small nuclear bombs : / that there was no fission is not the point; it's rare to see conventional explosives detonated on such a scale.
and tnt? maybe ammonium nitrate or emulsion of some type, but tnt it aint. nice shot though. And yep im a thinkin about 30. I have prepared and initiated my fair share of large production shots in an underground enviroment, and above ground, and it doesnt look like 300 ton. more like 30 of low grade explosive, as i said, ANFO or Emulsion. have a look at 100 tons of hi ex ordnace that was destroyed in Iraq.(100 ton explosion) if you want a pseudo mini nuke explosion, check that out. as i said 30.
This is nothing like a nuclear explosion. It's just a big explosion. A nuclear explosion has Hydrogen, Uranium or Plutonium in it? Atleast something that can be usedto creaTE FISSION.
mini-nuclear explosion? im sorry, but you can say that any explosion is technically a mini-nuclear explosion if your criteria doesnt include the actual NUCLEAR components of the bomb...lol
it almost formed a mushroom cloud lol.. but the russians tested one that was equivilant to 50 kilotons of tnt up on their northern island i forget what it was called
Mushroom cloud forming is a sign of inefficient explosives. That's a reason gasoline explosions make mushroom clouds. Nuclear bombs are however so big that the air surrounding the cloud can't cool the explosion down thus making it stay hot long enough to form a mushroom cloud.
I love how people use the word "nuclear blast" so much. Fact is this is either 300tons or 3000tons (both are stated) of tnt and a 1megaton nuke is 1,000,000 tons of tnt. Come on...your three 0's off even if you expect me to believe it's a 5kiloton blast. I guess you could argue that some nuclear weapon have been far less then a megaton but that was next to nothing compared to any good sized blast.
@alanaldasucks Yes, this is nowhere near even the weakest nuclear weapons (if it's really 300 tons and not 3000). 3000 would be an extremely weak "backpack type" nuclear weapon.
this is definately not 3000 KT of tnt. the largest tnt test was done in the south pacific to simulate the effect of a nuclear explosion on naval forces. the shockwave frome even 500 tons was astounding. 3000 kts of tnt would cost more than building a low 15kt hiroshima bomb! and the shockwave from a 3 kt bomb would have to be filmed from farther away.
That doesn't matter. Also the largest amount of TNT detonated is 500 metric tons. Actually this doesn't even look like TNT. I've seen a lot of these videos with the same red underlined writing, all of them are wrong in dofferent ways. One stated that what we saw was around a 100 megaton nuke ;)
3kt is HUGE today most of nukes are sub kiloton because they are the most beneficial weapons for modern warfare (insurgent). As well as a 3kt explosion is almost as powerful as the Little Boy (Due to the "10Mt does NOT produce 10 times more blast area than 1Mt, its more like 1.8-2.1 times more..." rule, in the Kt range its even less) Its still hard to believe that this is 3000T after all even the Trinity TNT experiment was made with 108T/0.1Kt and that was government sponsored.
You = Stupid. 3kt is not huge today. Most deployed warheads are in the multiple hundred-kt range. For example, the warheads used on the Minuteman III are the W78 (350kt yield) or the W78 (475 kt). Nuclear weapons aren't going to be used on "insurgents". They are used for strategic deterrence.
I know...its not the type or characteristics of the blast, its the magnitude...15Kt (Hiroshima) was 15,000 Tonnes of TNT (equal)...this was only 3000 Tonnes. Still very photogenic!
More like "ka-boink!"
StevenShields29 3 months ago
That was around 18 tons (or around 40'000 pounds) TNT-equivalent. Shot in september 2001 in the former Nevada Test Site, at BEEF. Search for "watusi experiment" if you want to know more.
fuzgi 9 months ago
Comment removed
fuzgi 9 months ago
3000 kt = 6 billion pounds lol. So yeah as everyone has said and the original poster acknowledged, that's not correct. So, how much is it really? no idea
billiondollardan 9 months ago
was this in area 51 ?
DJ3G3T5 9 months ago
300 tons is 0.3 kilotons not 3
riceicles123 1 year ago
300 tons is not a 3 kiloton's. You need to look up the definition of kilo you fucking idiot. KILO=1000!!!!!!!!!!
superskullmaster 1 year ago
Did you get hit by the shockwave in the heli? (might be an obvious question, I'm just curious)
oXFalconXo 1 year ago
300 tons is NOT 3 KILO (1000) tons...
calgaryfox 1 year ago
ZOMGWTFSPLOSION... Thats what happens if you put a PC disk in a MAC...
Spartan117JMC 1 year ago
I am trying to find footage of the Minor Scale test. Over 4000 tons of ANFO blown on the white sands missile range.
SvenTviking 1 year ago
Comment removed
fuzgi 10 months ago
That, almost certainly, is less than 3 kilotons.
HadeanAgent 1 year ago
on vois bien l'onde de choque!! c styler!!^^
cassetteman1 1 year ago
ok, where is the mini nuke explosion ? behind the smoke ?
TheTvRadioDude 2 years ago
@TheTvRadioDude don't you see the shockwave dude?
darkdjo 1 year ago
@darkdjo yes so what ? is it special or something ?
TheTvRadioDude 1 year ago
that true there is a lot of vids like it but I think it's cool :) No?
darkdjo 1 year ago
yeah, i think its fine, not very special but still impressive
TheTvRadioDude 1 year ago
Technically speaking it's not a "mini-nuclear" explosion as there's no fission reaction. Hell of a blast, though.
Hritzness 2 years ago
I am sure that was heard for miles away
garyhstorms09 2 years ago
Dude thats not in any remote desert thats out over by Area 51, near one of the launch pads..
eevyion 2 years ago
The Tsar Bomb is better. Its a 50Mega TOn explosion, absolutely huge. look it up on youtube :)
sebby1235 2 years ago
the bomb that was dropped on hiroshima was around 13 kilotons, so imagine a bomb 43 times as powerful as this one. A normal nuke now can be as much as 2-3 megatons (or 10000 times this one)
ceejaybro 2 years ago
300 tons = 0,3 kilo tons
Daaab89 2 years ago
lol youre right! lol
DwarfVaderRus 2 years ago
watch at the top of the screen as soon as the intro ends, you cansee something fallout of the sky before it explodes. I think that was a missle explosion.
1DecayingPlatapus 2 years ago
Thats not a missile thats light from the blast.
420hih 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i took a shit this morning that was more impressive
BinaryComa 2 years ago
How can it be 'mini-nuclear' when there isn't even a smidge of nuclear fission going on in that explosion?
HelmutVillam 2 years ago
... Obviously ... the point was that it was on a scale up there with small nuclear bombs : / that there was no fission is not the point; it's rare to see conventional explosives detonated on such a scale.
EvaUpfold 2 years ago
I've seen better
betrekwoman 2 years ago
hes saying that the blast yeild was equivilent to a small nuke
chrisy909 2 years ago
Comment removed
Mynameisnotooo 2 years ago
That would be trinitrotoluene more commonly known as TNT......
iceman21yrs 2 years ago
lol its tnt
RomanianUser 2 years ago
bill damn ....
Djenbazoff 2 years ago
"Mini- Nuclear explosion" the text says even though its not nuclear
atom2009 2 years ago
The credits were longer than the video
cag3171a 2 years ago
wheres the sound of the boom (a few miles away)
Jackpot807 3 years ago
i dont understand why all of these amazing videos arnt all 5 stars solid
BensCrazyVideos 3 years ago
reminds me of Fallout 3
Snowboarder3195 3 years ago
KA-BLAMMO
clappyslapper 3 years ago
haha REALLY big boom
silentquartet 3 years ago
holy-terrorist:> mm col for explosing the vehicle, and im the progression explosif, and pub the info explosif *=*
Agentoxedo07 3 years ago
thats no way 3000 tonnes of TNT
c2c2p1 3 years ago 12
and tnt? maybe ammonium nitrate or emulsion of some type, but tnt it aint. nice shot though. And yep im a thinkin about 30. I have prepared and initiated my fair share of large production shots in an underground enviroment, and above ground, and it doesnt look like 300 ton. more like 30 of low grade explosive, as i said, ANFO or Emulsion. have a look at 100 tons of hi ex ordnace that was destroyed in Iraq.(100 ton explosion) if you want a pseudo mini nuke explosion, check that out. as i said 30.
shotfirer1972 3 years ago
it looks like ants are having nuclear war .
ROKR77 3 years ago 7
lmfao
420tenke420 3 years ago
no flash
Billete37 3 years ago
This is nothing like a nuclear explosion. It's just a big explosion. A nuclear explosion has Hydrogen, Uranium or Plutonium in it? Atleast something that can be usedto creaTE FISSION.
tHIS IS JUST A BIG @SS BANG....
highwireman 3 years ago 2
read the description, it says: over 300 tonnes of TNT.
in the video stands "mini nuclear explosion" because of the mushroom cloud and maybe the shockwave.
Gazzy1500 3 years ago
still nothing nucleair
koevis 2 years ago
this is really cool
mini-nuclear explosion? im sorry, but you can say that any explosion is technically a mini-nuclear explosion if your criteria doesnt include the actual NUCLEAR components of the bomb...lol
ClintLock1 3 years ago
it almost formed a mushroom cloud lol.. but the russians tested one that was equivilant to 50 kilotons of tnt up on their northern island i forget what it was called
thad209sk 3 years ago
Mushroom cloud forming is a sign of inefficient explosives. That's a reason gasoline explosions make mushroom clouds. Nuclear bombs are however so big that the air surrounding the cloud can't cool the explosion down thus making it stay hot long enough to form a mushroom cloud.
Nuker1337 3 years ago
50 kilotons? then it's ok that u forget it's name ,we all can forget it's name :P
jlasud 3 years ago
50 Megatons. referring to the Tsar Bomba
deadheadkid92 3 years ago
srry thats cool but thats definetatly not a nuke sim
Yomommalinkmugen 3 years ago
well maybe
Fakie85 4 years ago
sry but this doesnt looks like 3000 tons at all
maybe 300
Fakie85 4 years ago
I love how people use the word "nuclear blast" so much. Fact is this is either 300tons or 3000tons (both are stated) of tnt and a 1megaton nuke is 1,000,000 tons of tnt. Come on...your three 0's off even if you expect me to believe it's a 5kiloton blast. I guess you could argue that some nuclear weapon have been far less then a megaton but that was next to nothing compared to any good sized blast.
AngerPersonified 4 years ago
i had an m80 that looked like that
alanaldasucks 4 years ago 4
lol cool.
segregator236 4 years ago
@alanaldasucks Yes, this is nowhere near even the weakest nuclear weapons.
MagicJigPipe 10 months ago
@alanaldasucks Yes, this is nowhere near even the weakest nuclear weapons (if it's really 300 tons and not 3000). 3000 would be an extremely weak "backpack type" nuclear weapon.
MagicJigPipe 10 months ago
Wooooow!
You can hear the shockwave even on the helicopter!
csengeri 4 years ago
Yeah. The explosion must have been loud.
segregator236 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HOW WEAK..!!! ALL NUKES & WEAPONS OF HUMANS CANNOT EVEN DESTROY EARTH.. very very weak weapons..!!!
earth must be planted of super bomb also the universe must be destroyed...!!!
no one can escape now for sure!!! specially galaxy and universe.!!!
zudunow 4 years ago
It was actualy a 36,000 pound explosion to simulate a small underground nuclear blast.
brendonmilligan07 4 years ago
the explosion is too small to be 3kt..
Ilrond 4 years ago
it was UNDERGROUND!... for not knowing that, ur an idiot
tornadomad 4 years ago
Thanks, but please stop spamming people.
segregator236 4 years ago
this is definately not 3000 KT of tnt. the largest tnt test was done in the south pacific to simulate the effect of a nuclear explosion on naval forces. the shockwave frome even 500 tons was astounding. 3000 kts of tnt would cost more than building a low 15kt hiroshima bomb! and the shockwave from a 3 kt bomb would have to be filmed from farther away.
tewkewl 4 years ago
It was probably a 300-ton bomb, I'm sorry...
segregator236 4 years ago
@tewkewl No my friend, you need to do more research. Look up "Minor Scale" and "Misty Picture."
r0ck3tsm0k3 11 months ago
look up minor scale, that's an awesome looking simulation
corruptcrew 4 years ago
Yeah, lol
segregator236 4 years ago
Ehh... This does not look like anything near 3000 tons. More like a couple hundred at best
Uberownager 4 years ago
This was shot from far away...
segregator236 4 years ago
That doesn't matter. Also the largest amount of TNT detonated is 500 metric tons. Actually this doesn't even look like TNT. I've seen a lot of these videos with the same red underlined writing, all of them are wrong in dofferent ways. One stated that what we saw was around a 100 megaton nuke ;)
Uberownager 4 years ago
Or maybe it was 300 tonnes...
segregator236 4 years ago
3kt is HUGE today most of nukes are sub kiloton because they are the most beneficial weapons for modern warfare (insurgent). As well as a 3kt explosion is almost as powerful as the Little Boy (Due to the "10Mt does NOT produce 10 times more blast area than 1Mt, its more like 1.8-2.1 times more..." rule, in the Kt range its even less) Its still hard to believe that this is 3000T after all even the Trinity TNT experiment was made with 108T/0.1Kt and that was government sponsored.
whaib87 4 years ago
The world's largest man-made explosion was a Russian hydrogen bomb at the yield of 50 megatonnes. That equalled 50 million tonnes of TNT!
segregator236 4 years ago
For the sake of accuracy, it was 57 MT. And yes very amazing. Shockwave went around the world 3 times. Too bad I wasn't around to notice that
Shifts 4 years ago
Yeah same here...
segregator236 4 years ago
You = Stupid. 3kt is not huge today. Most deployed warheads are in the multiple hundred-kt range. For example, the warheads used on the Minuteman III are the W78 (350kt yield) or the W78 (475 kt). Nuclear weapons aren't going to be used on "insurgents". They are used for strategic deterrence.
goingbust 4 years ago
A great explosion...but sorry to burst your bubble...the hiroshima bomb 'little boy' was 15 Kilotons, this (as described) was only 3 Kilotons.
flyboy172r 4 years ago
Yes. I didn't say this explosion was larger than a normal nuclear blast.
segregator236 4 years ago
I know...its not the type or characteristics of the blast, its the magnitude...15Kt (Hiroshima) was 15,000 Tonnes of TNT (equal)...this was only 3000 Tonnes. Still very photogenic!
flyboy172r 4 years ago
I'm not exactly sure, but this was done several years ago...more than 5 years ago...
segregator236 4 years ago