@cbooth2004 I think you mean 'Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.' Essentially the fine tuning, or the anthropic arguement is that if the universe was different then.....er........it would be different.
I wasn't paying too much attention to this horseshit, but I did notice two obvious errors. Firstly the oxygen cycle and that we have always been male and female.
Write for your FREE subscription of the ‘Good News’ …a magazine of wisdom & understanding: ‘Good News’ Magazine, GPO Box 535, Brisbane, Qld 4001 Australia …OR read the ‘Good News’ online at: h t t p://ucg[dot]org[dot]au/?good-news
Yeah, all this is true just because a book written by people says so and because you echo it. You didn't disprove evolution in any way whatsoever. You just stated a bunch of stuff you believe.
The most amazing thing about God's "design" is a set of laws for physics and chemistry that makes evolution work as it does. The "mind of God" is far beyond that of the "Creationist" who can't fathom the methods God actually used to create the Earth and the Universe. Shame that it took others to understand how it was actually done. Because of Creationists' failure, many threw out God himself because of their refusal to give God credit for evolution.
After reading Richard Dawkins 437 pages of "The Greatest Show on Earth the Evidence for Evolution", I was struck by the number of times the subjunctive mood, of suppositions about the Theory are used.
There are 800 uses of 'if', 'maybe', 'perhaps', 'possibly', 'might', 'suppose', 'could', 'suggests', in Darwins 429 page Origin of the Species.
But, Richard surpasses his high priest of Materialism, with 1,079 such suggestions he admits, is "seduction" to have us accept guesswork as "fact"??
@KenEdMurray No, you don't have to accept subjunctive language as fact. That's why he uses subjunctive mood. He doesn't want to misrepresent speculation as fact--unlike creationists.
FREE booklet: Creation or Evolution Does it Really Matter What You Believe? at: w w w[dot]gnmagazine[dot]org/booklets/EV/
This free booklet explains why the theory of evolution is a hoax. It explains Who created the universe and all non-living things and living creatures. Without this basic knowledge, humans are unable to begin to understand the purpose of why we are here, and the incredible opportunity available to us, now.
Post hoc, ergo proctor hoc.
cbooth2004 8 months ago
@cbooth2004 I think you mean 'Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.' Essentially the fine tuning, or the anthropic arguement is that if the universe was different then.....er........it would be different.
I wasn't paying too much attention to this horseshit, but I did notice two obvious errors. Firstly the oxygen cycle and that we have always been male and female.
gamesbok 8 months ago
Write for your FREE subscription of the ‘Good News’ …a magazine of wisdom & understanding: ‘Good News’ Magazine, GPO Box 535, Brisbane, Qld 4001 Australia …OR read the ‘Good News’ online at: h t t p://ucg[dot]org[dot]au/?good-news
KenEdMurray 1 year ago
Yeah, all this is true just because a book written by people says so and because you echo it. You didn't disprove evolution in any way whatsoever. You just stated a bunch of stuff you believe.
psyclistic 1 year ago
The most amazing thing about God's "design" is a set of laws for physics and chemistry that makes evolution work as it does. The "mind of God" is far beyond that of the "Creationist" who can't fathom the methods God actually used to create the Earth and the Universe. Shame that it took others to understand how it was actually done. Because of Creationists' failure, many threw out God himself because of their refusal to give God credit for evolution.
Tapajara 1 year ago
For answers to life's big questions, check out the latest FREE Good News magazine at:
h t t p ://w w w[dot]ucg[dot]org[dot]au/?gn/good-news-88
KenEdMurray 1 year ago
After reading Richard Dawkins 437 pages of "The Greatest Show on Earth the Evidence for Evolution", I was struck by the number of times the subjunctive mood, of suppositions about the Theory are used.
There are 800 uses of 'if', 'maybe', 'perhaps', 'possibly', 'might', 'suppose', 'could', 'suggests', in Darwins 429 page Origin of the Species.
But, Richard surpasses his high priest of Materialism, with 1,079 such suggestions he admits, is "seduction" to have us accept guesswork as "fact"??
KenEdMurray 2 years ago
@KenEdMurray No, you don't have to accept subjunctive language as fact. That's why he uses subjunctive mood. He doesn't want to misrepresent speculation as fact--unlike creationists.
psyclistic 1 year ago
Is this life all there is, and then oblivion?? ...or is there something more? Why are we here?
Is there a purpose for our lives?
What is our destiny, and is that destiny inextricably linked with the existence of God?
Check out the answers at: h t t p://ucg[dot]org[dot]au/?library/booklets/does-god-exist
KenEdMurray 2 years ago
FREE booklet: Creation or Evolution Does it Really Matter What You Believe? at: w w w[dot]gnmagazine[dot]org/booklets/EV/
This free booklet explains why the theory of evolution is a hoax. It explains Who created the universe and all non-living things and living creatures. Without this basic knowledge, humans are unable to begin to understand the purpose of why we are here, and the incredible opportunity available to us, now.
KenEdMurray 2 years ago