pseudotruth, Monbiot didn't "own" Plimer, he interrupted him and pestered him with cliches. Plimer should have, and could have put him in his place, but Monbiot was disrespectful and I think Plimer didn't want to give him an answer to acknowledge him whatsoever. Monbiot is an idiot who makes a good show but has nothing to back him up accept irrational cliched arguments and harking back to data from the IPCC known to be distorted. The history of this movement is sickening.
Yes his interests in mining could be call for concern, that however is beside the point. He brings sourced evidence that is being ignored by the few dictators that are running this cash cow. I would tend to uphold the words and citations of a geologist over a politician any day of the week.
The glaciers advance and retreat, except they are retreating. Sea levels rise and fall, except they are rising.
If you watch Plimer interviewed by Tony Jones you can see him run from science and go political when he's asked to back up his claim that the earth is cooling. By his reckoning that means he lost the argument.
glaciers are not retreating, they are calving. BIG difference, calfing is the breaking off of ice not from 'melting' but from creeping, due to the added mass from increased precipitation. NASA shows the overall mass of ice is increasing. also the sea level isn't shown to be rising, also from satellite data, which is much more reliable than terrestrial data.
Glaciers both calve & melt. All else being equal, an increase in precipitation (snowfall) will cause the glacier to grow. This may mean more calving but there will still be a net increase in volume.
The retreat of glaciers is a global phenomenon, and it reflects higher mean air temperatures.
If Plimer's arguments were as watertight as he claims, he would have submitted them to a premier peer-reviewed scientific journal like 'Nature' for publication.
The fact is that he hasn't, he put them in a book that has been slated by numerous scientists.
For a list of the errors and deceits in Plimer's Climate drivel,
google:
Ian Plimer Heaven Earth checking the claims Enting
The only 'missing science' is the science missing from Plimer's arguments!
Plimer was OWNED by Monbiot on ABC, the ever arrogant Plimer was shown to be a fraud. Plimer lies about CO2 from volcanoes, the lies again and gets repeatedly caught-out when tested against the science.
And these lies were in the list that you claimed were inadequate! Were you being dishonest, or just incompetent? Give an honest answer! [this time]
Any vestige of Plimer's credibility has been torn to shreds.
I urge you to follow the debate which is due to take place between George Monbiot and Ian Plimer regarding this book. Many scientists have stated that Plimer's book is full of errors (see link below). Let's wait and see how Plimer answers Monbiot's specific questions, and consider whether we then want to trust his book as being scientifically accurate.
pseudotruth, Monbiot didn't "own" Plimer, he interrupted him and pestered him with cliches. Plimer should have, and could have put him in his place, but Monbiot was disrespectful and I think Plimer didn't want to give him an answer to acknowledge him whatsoever. Monbiot is an idiot who makes a good show but has nothing to back him up accept irrational cliched arguments and harking back to data from the IPCC known to be distorted. The history of this movement is sickening.
lucentenor 1 year ago
Yes his interests in mining could be call for concern, that however is beside the point. He brings sourced evidence that is being ignored by the few dictators that are running this cash cow. I would tend to uphold the words and citations of a geologist over a politician any day of the week.
willowb22 2 years ago
The glaciers advance and retreat, except they are retreating. Sea levels rise and fall, except they are rising.
If you watch Plimer interviewed by Tony Jones you can see him run from science and go political when he's asked to back up his claim that the earth is cooling. By his reckoning that means he lost the argument.
cristop5 2 years ago
glaciers are not retreating, they are calving. BIG difference, calfing is the breaking off of ice not from 'melting' but from creeping, due to the added mass from increased precipitation. NASA shows the overall mass of ice is increasing. also the sea level isn't shown to be rising, also from satellite data, which is much more reliable than terrestrial data.
willowb22 2 years ago 3
@willowb22
Glaciers both calve & melt. All else being equal, an increase in precipitation (snowfall) will cause the glacier to grow. This may mean more calving but there will still be a net increase in volume.
The retreat of glaciers is a global phenomenon, and it reflects higher mean air temperatures.
ref: w ww.grid.unep.c h/glaciers/pdfs/glaciers.pdf
cristop5 2 years ago
@willowb22
The Arctic sea ice is thinning:
ww w.nasa.g o v/topics/earth/features/icesat-20090707r.h tml
Greenland & Antarctica are also losing ice:
ww w.agu.o r g/pubs/crossref/2009/2009GL040222.shtm l
cristop5 2 years ago
@willowb22
Satellite data show mean global sea levels have risen about 50mm since 1993.
ht tp:/ /sealevel.colorado.e du/results.php
or
ht tp://sealevel.colorado.e du/current/sl_ib_ns_global.jpg
cristop5 2 years ago
they don't work sorry - threads for forums...
willowb22 2 years ago
@willowb22
Youtube won't allow you to put in direct links (anti-spam measure), so I had to put some spaces in there.
If you paste a link then remove all the spaces you will see the article. I think one link has a space at the end of it.
cristop5 2 years ago
Post Climategate...PIlmer is vindicated. What a blast of fresh air...
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Plimer supporters
Since Plimer refuses to answer Monbiot's questions, do us all a favour and answer them for him!
I and many others [including Plimer] look forward to the answers. They can be found at:
google
Monbiot Let battle commence! Climate change denialist ready for the fight
pseudotruth 2 years ago
If Plimer's arguments were as watertight as he claims, he would have submitted them to a premier peer-reviewed scientific journal like 'Nature' for publication.
The fact is that he hasn't, he put them in a book that has been slated by numerous scientists.
For a list of the errors and deceits in Plimer's Climate drivel,
google:
Ian Plimer Heaven Earth checking the claims Enting
The only 'missing science' is the science missing from Plimer's arguments!
pseudotruth 2 years ago
I checked the errors and deceits. They are inadequate for any proper refutation. Sorry.
jmchristian63 2 years ago
jmchristian63
Plimer was OWNED by Monbiot on ABC, the ever arrogant Plimer was shown to be a fraud. Plimer lies about CO2 from volcanoes, the lies again and gets repeatedly caught-out when tested against the science.
And these lies were in the list that you claimed were inadequate! Were you being dishonest, or just incompetent? Give an honest answer! [this time]
Any vestige of Plimer's credibility has been torn to shreds.
Google
Plimer, Monbiot cross swords in climate debate
pseudotruth 2 years ago
Thank God a voice of sanity.
Sigifrith 2 years ago 8
Also the director of three mining companies. He claims there's no conflict of interest however.
rimian 2 years ago
Excellent interview, Thanks for posting!
ninjafreak9500 2 years ago 3
excellent interview, Thanks spoonman!
concerned1juan 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
mrtplottens 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I urge you to follow the debate which is due to take place between George Monbiot and Ian Plimer regarding this book. Many scientists have stated that Plimer's book is full of errors (see link below). Let's wait and see how Plimer answers Monbiot's specific questions, and consider whether we then want to trust his book as being scientifically accurate.
guardian(dot)co(dot)uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/aug/05 /climate-change-scepticism
mrtplottens 2 years ago