Added: 2 years ago
From: PoliticsNewsPolitics
Views: 2,133
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "It's hard to keep runnin' a dog up the same track..." I love you Bill!

  • The problem with socialism is,...you eventually will run out of other peoples money

    In 2010 the Looney-Left will be voted out to stop the destruction of America,along with the "culture of corruption"=,Obama and his team of tax cheats,crooks and cronies

  • What like President Bush run out of money. Under capitalism, Ooops

  • Bipartisan means both parties take turns kicking you in the ass

  • ● republic-CONS & democ-RATS●

  • lol,moar liek, republiCUNTs amirite?

  • Clinton says 'The doers [read: government spenders] prevail, just as they did in the 90's'...

    Well, the Socialists always want to be The Doers, The Big Spenders, The Big Government..... That can work for a while, especially when the economy is doing well... but as anyone who's got a mortgage loan, an American Express or a Visa card knows, you can't just keep spending if you can't repay it.

    If you do, The Day of Reckoning INEVITABLY comes.

  • No, "do-ers" are people who give a shit about the country, whilst "can'ts" are those who are mentally inept and unable to progress a nation.

  • You call taking the American taxpayer to the cleaners 'giving a shit about the country'. What is 'giving a shit' about hocking the country to the international bankers?

  • Clinton's spending was well below that of Bush and he balanced the budget. Also, Clinton was to the right of Bush on many economic matters, including free trade, farm subsidies, and paying down the national debt. Clinton had a strong dollar policy, Bush chose to debase the dollar. Complain all you want, but things the economy was much better and less socialistic under Clinton.

  • Well, to be honest, I think both the Democratic and the Republican parties are just two sides of the same coin. Both parties are more interested in building a global government, a global order, at any cost, even if it means destroying the American free economy, rather than doing what's in the interests of the America and the American people.

  • Yes he balanced it, by gutting the armed forces.

  • he didn't gut them nearly enough. People playng GI Joe need to get real jobs and stop sucking our tits.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more