The problem with socialism is,...you eventually will run out of other peoples money
In 2010 the Looney-Left will be voted out to stop the destruction of America,along with the "culture of corruption"=,Obama and his team of tax cheats,crooks and cronies
Clinton says 'The doers [read: government spenders] prevail, just as they did in the 90's'...
Well, the Socialists always want to be The Doers, The Big Spenders, The Big Government..... That can work for a while, especially when the economy is doing well... but as anyone who's got a mortgage loan, an American Express or a Visa card knows, you can't just keep spending if you can't repay it.
If you do, The Day of Reckoning INEVITABLY comes.
You call taking the American taxpayer to the cleaners 'giving a shit about the country'. What is 'giving a shit' about hocking the country to the international bankers?
Clinton's spending was well below that of Bush and he balanced the budget. Also, Clinton was to the right of Bush on many economic matters, including free trade, farm subsidies, and paying down the national debt. Clinton had a strong dollar policy, Bush chose to debase the dollar. Complain all you want, but things the economy was much better and less socialistic under Clinton.
Well, to be honest, I think both the Democratic and the Republican parties are just two sides of the same coin. Both parties are more interested in building a global government, a global order, at any cost, even if it means destroying the American free economy, rather than doing what's in the interests of the America and the American people.
"It's hard to keep runnin' a dog up the same track..." I love you Bill!
jamesrumsey 2 years ago
The problem with socialism is,...you eventually will run out of other peoples money
In 2010 the Looney-Left will be voted out to stop the destruction of America,along with the "culture of corruption"=,Obama and his team of tax cheats,crooks and cronies
mrjericho5701 2 years ago
What like President Bush run out of money. Under capitalism, Ooops
zzxzqwq 2 years ago
Bipartisan means both parties take turns kicking you in the ass
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
● republic-CONS & democ-RATS●
BabybooR33 2 years ago
lol,moar liek, republiCUNTs amirite?
AimiriZ 2 years ago
Clinton says 'The doers [read: government spenders] prevail, just as they did in the 90's'...
Well, the Socialists always want to be The Doers, The Big Spenders, The Big Government..... That can work for a while, especially when the economy is doing well... but as anyone who's got a mortgage loan, an American Express or a Visa card knows, you can't just keep spending if you can't repay it.
If you do, The Day of Reckoning INEVITABLY comes.
piesnalewizne 2 years ago
No, "do-ers" are people who give a shit about the country, whilst "can'ts" are those who are mentally inept and unable to progress a nation.
FixedNewsChannel 2 years ago 4
You call taking the American taxpayer to the cleaners 'giving a shit about the country'. What is 'giving a shit' about hocking the country to the international bankers?
piesnalewizne 2 years ago
Clinton's spending was well below that of Bush and he balanced the budget. Also, Clinton was to the right of Bush on many economic matters, including free trade, farm subsidies, and paying down the national debt. Clinton had a strong dollar policy, Bush chose to debase the dollar. Complain all you want, but things the economy was much better and less socialistic under Clinton.
Zeldovich 2 years ago 5
Well, to be honest, I think both the Democratic and the Republican parties are just two sides of the same coin. Both parties are more interested in building a global government, a global order, at any cost, even if it means destroying the American free economy, rather than doing what's in the interests of the America and the American people.
piesnalewizne 2 years ago
Yes he balanced it, by gutting the armed forces.
darrellmellissa 2 years ago
he didn't gut them nearly enough. People playng GI Joe need to get real jobs and stop sucking our tits.
Zeldovich 2 years ago 2