It's not SolidWorks 2009, lol. That's SPECviewperf 10 test sw-02, in real SolidWorks only difference is support for RealView on FireGL/Pro and Quadro cards, no performance issues on consumer cards whatsoever.
The comparison is irrelevant as the 4850 provides no acceleration to SW'09 by default. It's not a faster card, it's just got professional acceleration enabled in the BIOS. In the 4850 case the CPU is doing all the work and the GPU just puts it up on the screen(far as I know, an iGPU can do EXACTLY the same job at that)
you can get least 90% of the FirePro power with the correspondent Radeon card when you hack the firepro driver to run on radeons... not complicated, and the CAD systems loving it...
Yepp... One is for gaming, other is for workstations. But these cards will never render you down a scene at all. The only extra that you can get from these cards are faster viewport and not rendering... There is no card at the moment that supports real time rendering... :)
He is just saying that the comparison is unfair; both cards do support opengl but one is using it and the other is not. So it is not about the cards it is about the support/software for those cards. If you really wanted to compare the true power of those cards then use a benchmark program so it's fair, this is just marketing.
It's not SolidWorks 2009, lol. That's SPECviewperf 10 test sw-02, in real SolidWorks only difference is support for RealView on FireGL/Pro and Quadro cards, no performance issues on consumer cards whatsoever.
MrLestatto 7 months ago
The comparison is irrelevant as the 4850 provides no acceleration to SW'09 by default. It's not a faster card, it's just got professional acceleration enabled in the BIOS. In the 4850 case the CPU is doing all the work and the GPU just puts it up on the screen(far as I know, an iGPU can do EXACTLY the same job at that)
233kosta 10 months ago
What monitors are they?
okokewtf 1 year ago
@okokewtf
dell?
hateWinVista 1 year ago
@okokewtf LCD
Jacor74 3 months ago
performance difference? no... driver difference? sure :)
you can get least 90% of the FirePro power with the correspondent Radeon card when you hack the firepro driver to run on radeons... not complicated, and the CAD systems loving it...
magnificatorig 1 year ago 4
Yepp... One is for gaming, other is for workstations. But these cards will never render you down a scene at all. The only extra that you can get from these cards are faster viewport and not rendering... There is no card at the moment that supports real time rendering... :)
Pi3c3 2 years ago
this is the Most STUPIEST Vs EVER you cant compare these two at all one is for GAMING one is for RENDERING
TestVideo2SamsPimp 2 years ago
@TestVideo2SamsPimp uhh.... yeah that was the point of the post. so... STUPIDEST COMMENT EVER! haha
amerikanight 1 year ago 3
He is just saying that the comparison is unfair; both cards do support opengl but one is using it and the other is not. So it is not about the cards it is about the support/software for those cards. If you really wanted to compare the true power of those cards then use a benchmark program so it's fair, this is just marketing.
ForThereIsATomorrow 1 month ago
@TestVideo2SamsPimp lol even if 1 years old.. dude! thats the whole point.. you don't get it..
Balthasar00101 1 month ago
wow!!!!!!!
djtyper 2 years ago
Comment removed
ExtraPcForum 2 years ago