Andrea should have asked Kit what the role of the Office of special plans in the intel gathering and why such an office was created by Bush appointees when the WMD intel was so widely available.
Well I'm a happy subscriber. It's not really commentary (except for a little in the description) because heathr lets these guys hang themselves mostly.
Here Senator Bond makes the rhetorical argument that an intelligence summary reflects an entire set of available facts. It does not. Since the Executive controls intel, good luck on getting what you need Congress.
i love your channel heathr. don't change a thing. you aren't a journalist, but someone commenting on the news. editorializing is totally fine. it's when the person delivering the news itself starts editorializing (*cough* faux news* cough*) that it starts to stink.
fyi: trying to sell something is "peddling", trying to change a previous statement is back "pedaling".
I'm from Missouri, and this guy is a true blue idiot.. Of course Missouri is full of idiots, but this guy takes the cake. This guy is a weapon of mass destruction. He's a hill billy and a disgrace to america. There are more than a few like him around. They take big fat checks to make sure that the rich stay rich and the rednecks stay dumb. Nobody ever said we evolve quickly and Kit Bond shows why. I cannot fully express my disgust for this worthless soul.
For every Kit bond there's a Claire McCaskill, though. That's the good thing about being stuck in the middle: you get a good mix of idiotic and brilliant.
If there are always some officials who question the contents of the final reports, 1) it's patently false to characterize the contents of the NIE as being a consensus, 2) having just validated Panetta's statement himself, with what does Bond pretend to have a problem?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
heathr, you need to stop editorializing your videos. You don't even pretend to be objective, and through cognitive dissonance you rationalize away and distort (republican) statements which contradict your previously-held (liberal) beliefs. Whether you're right or wrong is irrelevant.
thanks for the upload as usual heathr
24LakerGirl 3 years ago
Keep it up Repubs and you will never win another election.
burntonion05 3 years ago
kit is a nutcase!
kargenlewis 3 years ago
Andrea should have asked Kit what the role of the Office of special plans in the intel gathering and why such an office was created by Bush appointees when the WMD intel was so widely available.
xdir 3 years ago
Peddling...please.
Pedaling is something one does on a bicycle.
Scoppertop 3 years ago
Thanks. Fixed.
heathr456 3 years ago
oh lord, more re-writing of history justifying bush's lies to go into iraq... what a liar!!!
bbbbmer 3 years ago
Well I'm a happy subscriber. It's not really commentary (except for a little in the description) because heathr lets these guys hang themselves mostly.
Here Senator Bond makes the rhetorical argument that an intelligence summary reflects an entire set of available facts. It does not. Since the Executive controls intel, good luck on getting what you need Congress.
Zakdayak 3 years ago
i love your channel heathr. don't change a thing. you aren't a journalist, but someone commenting on the news. editorializing is totally fine. it's when the person delivering the news itself starts editorializing (*cough* faux news* cough*) that it starts to stink.
fyi: trying to sell something is "peddling", trying to change a previous statement is back "pedaling".
nicknonsense303 3 years ago 3
I'm from Missouri, and this guy is a true blue idiot.. Of course Missouri is full of idiots, but this guy takes the cake. This guy is a weapon of mass destruction. He's a hill billy and a disgrace to america. There are more than a few like him around. They take big fat checks to make sure that the rich stay rich and the rednecks stay dumb. Nobody ever said we evolve quickly and Kit Bond shows why. I cannot fully express my disgust for this worthless soul.
cat00012000 3 years ago 6
For every Kit bond there's a Claire McCaskill, though. That's the good thing about being stuck in the middle: you get a good mix of idiotic and brilliant.
andid 3 years ago
If there are always some officials who question the contents of the final reports, 1) it's patently false to characterize the contents of the NIE as being a consensus, 2) having just validated Panetta's statement himself, with what does Bond pretend to have a problem?
Nutrino2179 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
heathr, you need to stop editorializing your videos. You don't even pretend to be objective, and through cognitive dissonance you rationalize away and distort (republican) statements which contradict your previously-held (liberal) beliefs. Whether you're right or wrong is irrelevant.
whistleo 3 years ago