Yes, that is where the Df shines. The excalibur false alot with the amp on it when in saltwater.but still deeper then a stocker but far short of the Dual Field. I did several side by sides this past summer with other hunters on the wet sand..One called the Amped Headphones..HP's on steroids, one thing..these results can be so different on another beach..like Boca Roton Fl, think the improvement over stock was around 2 inch's ..
Yes, that is where the Df shines. The excalibur false alot with the amp on it when in saltwater.but still deeper then a stocker but far short of the Dual Field. I did several side by sides this past summer with other hunters on the wet sand..One called the Amped Headphones..HP's on steroids, one thing..these results can be so different on another beach..like Boca Roton Fl, think the improvement over stock was around 2 inch's ..so location and the Matrix of the sand can adversely affect depth.
Very informative comparison, tough decision which would be the best 'All Round' beach detector. Appears the Excalibur has fewer mineralization issues, hard to beat Minelab technology.
Yes, that is where the Df shines. The excalibur false alot with the amp on it when in saltwater.but still deeper then a stocker but far short of the Dual Field. I did several side by sides this past summer with other hunters on the wet sand..One called the Amped Headphones..HP's on steroids, one thing..these results can be so different on another beach..like Boca Roton Fl, think the improvement over stock was around 2 inch's ..
oldbeechnut 5 months ago
Yes, that is where the Df shines. The excalibur false alot with the amp on it when in saltwater.but still deeper then a stocker but far short of the Dual Field. I did several side by sides this past summer with other hunters on the wet sand..One called the Amped Headphones..HP's on steroids, one thing..these results can be so different on another beach..like Boca Roton Fl, think the improvement over stock was around 2 inch's ..so location and the Matrix of the sand can adversely affect depth.
oldbeechnut 5 months ago
I'm really confused. PI's by nature aren't affected by mineralization. Maybe pulse delay or pulse power caused the poor performance.
Great video though! Thanks for the comparison.
TheSilverFiend 6 months ago
White's DF is a king in the salt water. I can go up to 40".
ON the beach it SUCKS!!!
Do not even come close to Excalibur 2.
It's a fact...
dmatuse 9 months ago
@dmatuse
Is the DF better than the Excalibur IN salt water?
Nightlight35 5 months ago
Very informative comparison, tough decision which would be the best 'All Round' beach detector. Appears the Excalibur has fewer mineralization issues, hard to beat Minelab technology.
LostRingFinders 1 year ago