7x7x7 help

[gravitar96]

you have a rare but deadly case of virtual parody

[Speedcuber99]

I suggest starting over. But since you have over 3000 moves on it you should probably just pop out the pieces and switch them.

[IPwnAllAndLeaveNone]

parity sucks, yeah.

[yit2525]

i cant believe you: the master of rubiks cubes and mods" couldnt figure that out :( but i still am going to sub to you :D

[esquimalt1]

do you still need help? :P

[TotallyRandomVideoz]

this is SHIT!

[beaulolp]

WTF? LOL

[Khoaster]

well this kinda isn't parity at all this is actually because the guy did his edge pairing wrong.

[RubiksAddict95]

white on top, red on front.

F' l' U2 l' U2 F2 l' F2 r U2 r' U2 l2 F

[JMayzler]

bingo. who uses this shit anymore with the new v-7s out

[clockwise3559]

well this was made in 2008...............

[daniel0731ex]

first, you turn the slice 45 DEGREE

then, you place your thumb onto the cube piece

and stick it in there.

then you'll find that the piece poped off the cube.

do the same to the other piece, and then switch them to the right place.

and ur done!

please don't throw rocks at me

[teddyv7]

*throws rock*

[RedRoost80]

disassembling a 7x7 is quite different then a 3x3 l0l

[veikko95]

*throws another rock*

[DarthWong47]

*throws boulder*

[BuckKnowhow]

it's not even a real cube, its a gabbasoft online cube so you couldn't take it apart anyway lol...

[daniel0731ex]

*throws rock*

[elementsk8rbillly911]

you do the parity for switching the wing pieces and solve like 3x3.the alg is (Ll)' U2 (Ll)' U2 F2 (Rr) U2 (Rr)' U2 (Ll)2

[zekellion]

what game is this???

[iTheft]

gabbasoft

[barrymorrissey]

I'm sure by now You've figured it out, but I posted a video anyway cuz the other two I saw just didn't make sense to me. I don't know why they chose to do it the way they did. I'm assuming you got to this point cuz when solving the edges you had a problem and just moved on without fixing it. If it happens again just line up the unpaired edges and follow the algorithm in the video. Its slightly easier to fix if you catch it when pairing the edges. Hope this helps!

[xMapleThiefx]

I peel the stickers off and repaste them

[olympicworldrecord]

I can help you, go to "5x5 Edge Parity EASY" on youtube, they have the parity case you have, the parity you want is at 2:34 in the video!

[camcuber]

i knwo how to do it...

[jakeypwnz]

hahah that sucks so much.

virtually break it apart and put it back together :D

[ratedrsuperstar89]

do the edge parity like u uwld for the 4x4

[skateflip132]

wrong, that will not work. its the parity for a 5x5

[ratedrsuperstar89]

right my bad XD i dont like gabba nemore

[joshuaat7]

WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY PARITY ?

[ratedrsuperstar89]

on the 4x4 and so on and so forth, you have parities that dont occur on a regular 3x3. so you have certian algorithms to fix those parities. watch the tutorial video for the 4x4 and 5x5 that thrwast made

[joshuaat7]

never mind i found out bye a video thanks i thought you ment party i did not read it right

[Gopheur]

Then why did you also write "parity?"

[spotofblack]

yeah, you had parity when getting the edges correct, you do the same parity solution thingy mabob as is is on a 5x5 and then BAM! lyme disease.

[usamaki10]

get a real one and take it apart and hope that never happens again :P

[skateflip132]

thats just paridy. look up 5x5 paridy

[cubedrummer67]

pariTy. Parity has a t. At least you know what parity is, though.

[skateflip132]

im sorry?

[jonymush]

wth wen i solved mine i didnt get that? ooooh i know wat u didt do wat u do is put them in 1 layer like ur top with the unsolved piece on ur left then do R* 2u 5 times and then u have 3 messed up. 1 like right in front of u 1 next to that and 1 next to that move the last one to the front as the one u will be replacing as the messed up piece and boom uve got that done :) hope that helped

[Borgocity]

Ahahahah sorry !!!

[skankfaceman]

i duno how to get the last two centers =(

[Kawiezel]

facing blue (f) and having red on top (u) (same pieces wrong)

do f' l u*(directly under u)f2 u* f2 u* f2 u* f2 u*. now just solve the last 4 wrong edges and you should end up with complete edges

[razberyz]

woops, could you remove my gummy bear vid, I pressed the wrong button

also check out my real response

[dannyr900]

hahaha this is funny to me

[jsreed5]

I would switch one wing into where a solved wing already is, flip the edge, ans slice back, moving the other edge back. With the way the edges are paired up now, there would be a non-central parity... but that shouldn't be much of a problem.

[MotoCrossCanada]

yes do the edges again

[AcEoFhEarTS1991]

i would just do the edges again but this time piar them all up istead of putting them in 1 by 1

[DesiCuber]

r U2 r U2 F2 r F2 l' U2 l U2 r2

Little letters are INNER SLICES, not double layers. Just saying because some places have inner layers as double layers. Do this algorithm on a 4x4 or 5x5 to see how to position the 2 edges, because I can't really explain it.

[Kickflip1993]

thank you so much, i solved it

[DesiCuber]

No prob :)

[fanwuq]

what method is that? I don't think that happens in reduction.

[DesiCuber]

It's just a commutator. COuld be used in K4 and in Cage. Dunno.

[fanwuq]

what method you use?

[DesiCuber]

Reduction.

[fanwuq]

then how do you know that alg?

[DesiCuber]

I use it for edge pairing.

[fanwuq]

ok, I just do the first 8 intuitionally and the last four with the wing swap.

[DesiCuber]

That is a wing swap alg. I do them all intutivley until the very last one.

[fanwuq]

i guess I should try it when I get the chance.

[esquimalt1]

It happpends in ruduction on the last 2 edges.

[BloodChuckNorris]

Pwned.

[pwn202]

rofl