I think JRM was rather mis-cast as Steerpike. The BBC went for eye-candy whereas in the book, Steerpike was ugly to the point of being slightly deformed. However, on the plus side, Neve McIntosh really nails the part of Fuschia.
I've always admired the production values of the BBC and while I'm not complaining, I think the props dept. ran to the nearest African Art store for the 'bright carvings' and simply painted them.Oh well, I might have done the same myself.
Fuchsia's character is very different in the books than in the show. In the novels, she's a very bright, intelligent character--but she's been so neglected that she is uneducated in a lot of things. She's inquisitive and has a very sharp wit; not some silly little girl like this. She dies by contemplating suicide brought on by the revelation that she loved a murder, and, climbing to her windowsill--slips, hits her head and is knocked unconscious before the flood waters receive her, drowning her.
@zombiesbass As far as I remember it is quite fairly accurate, but I mean to re read them again soon after seeing the series... the books have perhaps a deeper philosophical aspect
@Morgana0x no she is different in the books, still wild, but not manic and darker, much much darker, like everything else was in the book, I loved this series but they totally missed the point of alot of the book.
@xxtiaan Yes, they did. But no series could do full justice to the books. How can a tv series recreate a feeling? When reading the books you get so drawn in, so immersed in the atmosphere. It's totally different.
I don't think Steerpike is very good looking. I mean, Jonathan Rhys Meyers can be absolutely gorgeous sometimes, but he isn't in this.
KayaOfAyalia 2 weeks ago
I think JRM was rather mis-cast as Steerpike. The BBC went for eye-candy whereas in the book, Steerpike was ugly to the point of being slightly deformed. However, on the plus side, Neve McIntosh really nails the part of Fuschia.
MrAlohashirt 2 months ago
He is so devilishly brilliant!
hethenia 4 months ago
00:45 I love this character. He's great.
Atheneastro 5 months ago
@evieriley hahaha, not the actor, just the character. He's so... idk, I'm just not fond of him lol
agreatguy6 9 months ago
Am I the only one that despises Steerpike?
agreatguy6 11 months ago
it just now occured to me that chistopher lee (mr flay) played saruman in lord of the rings...i fail
NorthstarXXXI 1 year ago
I've always admired the production values of the BBC and while I'm not complaining, I think the props dept. ran to the nearest African Art store for the 'bright carvings' and simply painted them.Oh well, I might have done the same myself.
stayjit1 1 year ago
1.How could this happened to a "Young Lord"?
2.How could a princess like Fuchsia had only one pursuer?
BlueLarkFly 1 year ago
Fuchsia's character is very different in the books than in the show. In the novels, she's a very bright, intelligent character--but she's been so neglected that she is uneducated in a lot of things. She's inquisitive and has a very sharp wit; not some silly little girl like this. She dies by contemplating suicide brought on by the revelation that she loved a murder, and, climbing to her windowsill--slips, hits her head and is knocked unconscious before the flood waters receive her, drowning her.
xdarkwingsofdesire6 1 year ago
@xdarkwingsofdesire6 Your description of Fuchsia is right on the mark. Though I liked the series I didn't like the way they changed her so much.
Morgana0x 1 year ago
I can't remember, but did he kill her in the novel? Or did she die naturally?
MoonPhase94 2 years ago
*SPOILER*
she was thinkin about commitin suicide n slipd in2 the warter by accident i think
pacbizkit 2 years ago
I meant Nanny Slagg (lol, what a name!)
MoonPhase94 2 years ago
@MoonPhase94 These books have the most wonderfully inventive and apt names. Not to mention funny.
Morgana0x 1 year ago
Steerpike...the ultimate bad boy, dream boy. Soooo delicious.
motive440 2 years ago
fuchsia is the best!
TeneaRhiannon 2 years ago
Its hard to distinguish the real line between good and evil in the series, I wonder how accurate this is to the book.
zombiesbass 2 years ago 11
not very accurate.
TheNudibranch1 2 years ago
@zombiesbass As far as I remember it is quite fairly accurate, but I mean to re read them again soon after seeing the series... the books have perhaps a deeper philosophical aspect
anisete46 1 year ago
Oh, how can you say that! i love Fuchsia character! (is the reason why I use this nickname, of course...)
fucsia89 2 years ago 2
exactly, I confess I have a crush on her.
shes beautiful and a bit mad, whats not to love
xxtiaan 2 years ago 2
@xxtiaan I agree, Fuschia is very lovely :)
WeaselKing1000 2 years ago
she reminds me of a wuthering heights era kate bush whos hit the crack pipe once to often, sheer brilliance
xxtiaan 1 year ago
@xxtiaan LOL...good description. I don't remember her being this bad in the books though....was she?
Morgana0x 1 year ago
@Morgana0x no she is different in the books, still wild, but not manic and darker, much much darker, like everything else was in the book, I loved this series but they totally missed the point of alot of the book.
xxtiaan 1 year ago
@xxtiaan Yes, they did. But no series could do full justice to the books. How can a tv series recreate a feeling? When reading the books you get so drawn in, so immersed in the atmosphere. It's totally different.
Morgana0x 1 year ago
Christ, Fuschia is so fucking annoying, I just want to garotte her >.>
phytoalexa 2 years ago 5
@phytoalexa I like her.
TeneaRhiannon 1 year ago