911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov 25 of 26

[ed11561]

ALL FUCKING BULLSHIT.Those air monitors DO NOT MEASURE RADIOACTIVITY or

the amount of Radiation that a person absorbs at all.Not gamma radiation-NOTHING.

Mostly NO ONE wore any protection whatsoever.

LYING FUCKING IMPOSTER.

[amalek80]

There is one piece of footage that shows a remaining WTC column turning to dust. I didn't see it in your videos (although sometimes I was only listening and not watching) I can't post link here but search google images for wtc spire dust and it is there.

It supports your version of events.

[911thology]

@amalek80 - OK, I help you with this. Here is the link: /watch?v=goGGQhhTcDY

[amalek80]

@911thology Hi, yes, that's the one. I think there are better angles though. There are screen shots if you search google. (The image shows a water tower on the roof of a building in the foreground).

[ssnps]

This will put the melted cars preplexing evidence to rest.Another issue, why molten steel dripped on tower side above 80 floors, shown in many live video, if Thermate not used.

[annebeck58]

Thanks again for some amazing -- and highly educational- videos! I almost hate to finish up with the next one, partyly because I have more questions, but mainly due to your answering most of what I was not believing!

[TitusSviatoslav]

Thank you Dimitri for an informed and scientific analysis of the event with no political precepts. I will order your book tonight.

Since there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon or Shanksville, why assume that planes hit the towers, especially after WTC7!

[pedropicasso41]

Very interesting Dimitri. Thank you for sharing your information. Watched all 26

Is there more after 26? Who are the perpetrators in your view? And if no planes flew into WTC 1 and 2 . What took place there? The "no plane theory " seems to be the weakest link in your story. How fast can you edit a fake plane video and distribute that?

[911thology]

@pedropicasso41 - Thanks. I don't want to name here the one who did it, for even though I didn't name anyone yet, by now I am already marked on some chauvinistic web site as 'potentially harmful to Jews and/or Israel'. Regarding 'no-planes' argument - I know that this issue is very sensitive because it allegedly 'divides 9/11 truthers'. However I don't care about them.

[fake2]

@911thology of course you will be labeled as a madman. Please keep up the fight!

By the way.. I heard you like to kick puppies too! heheheh (joke)

[2JOHNNYT]

How nice for the govt to make sure clean up workers only got a safe dose of radiation, so thoughtful

[InfomaniacJack]

This interview has all the typical signs of a conspiracy theory, that is, presented fact findings that later we're confirmed by third party, when it might actually be taken directly from that third party and pasted into this context, an interviewer saying the very same thing has he who's interviewed but pretending to be critical, and repetitive music and clips of people saying things.... ...Nevertheless I find the theory of nuclear demolition itself to be very plausible.

[911thology]

Hmm. You know, the interviewer actually read my book I guess 15 or 16 times over and he totally agrees with all my points. So, it would be indeed difficult for him to be really 'critical' in this situation.

[annebeck58]

@911thology

Right, Dimitri, but he did ask the correct questions. which elicited responses that exposed truth- for US.

I felt the interviewer did a terrific job, as did you!