Added: 3 years ago
From: beatles754ever
Views: 89,994
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (98)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Una zampata del John più "drammatico" nel contesto di puro beat dei primi tempi gloriosi.Paul relegato al controcanto fornisce l'alter ego "sentimentale" del talento cristallino che possiede, l'equilibrio interno della genialità Beatle emerge anche in questa No Reply,davvero superba nella sua straordinaria semplicità.

  • anyway, cd transfers have been remixing stuff for years now. Sgt Pepper's been remixed. jagger has talked about exile on main street sounds terrible. Would love to hear all the beatles stuff remixed, cleaned up. Also Derek & the dominos LAYLA. So many things got buried in the master. Loved that Harrison remixed all things must pass. Always hated how so many parts were lost in the final mixes, especially horns & keyboards. Grandpa will stop talking now because UTUBE makes me decipher puzzles.

  • @bodywhomp98 I thought it was just me: a friend gave me a copy of the anniversary release of Exile on Main Street and it doesn't sound very good. The vocals seem buried for one thing. What's wrong with people releasing stuff like this?

  • so, what was enhanced? Was it remixed? remastered? stuff added? Wish someone would remix lots of classic albums. Always read that this LP was rushed between tours and suffered from the process of being pressed out. Still one of my favorites, especially words of love, but critics usually slam it for the too many covers. Well, don't pressure rock stars to put out lps when they've exhausted and burned out. Problem for us in the states was capitol's release screwing up the number of tracks.

  • Sexy Asian women **busizz4me.info**

  • @jhklgyui What the Hell sexy Asian women have to do with this song?...NO REPLY!!!!!

  • i like this remiX! beatles 4 EVER@

  • Someone mentioned the addition of bongos, I seem to recall hearing them briefly on my old, original version. But bringing the snare up in the mix to sound "hip", or "today"- please!

  • you just put in some drums and other crap. 

  • this is great!!! Listen not to other mean mr. mustard beatle fans.

  • Number 2 rule: Don't add to a song and say it's rare. YOU PISS PEOPLE OFFF

  • @capitolemiproducer Who said"It's rare"?...I didn't!

  • @capitolemiproducer Well, it's seems that YOU are the one who is pissed off !!

  • @capitolemiproducer it doesnt say rare...it says remixed. ie the sound quality.

  • loved it.

    can i ask you for the mp3 version?

  • nice job

  • This isn't "enhanced" it's remixed...or more honestly, butchered. Please remove this and don't ever do anything like this again.

  • @LeCutter Yes i agree with you, that's rather remixed than enhanced! Beatles754ever should've called it remix!

  • Oh man, it's not too bad, but you know that there's a stereo version.

  • The song has more punch. Lets face it, the Beatles did not have the technoligy that the America's had when it came to producing albums. The talent was there, yes but the technoligy wasn't.

  • This sucks.

  • @BecsabcI'd rather say that the word"enhanced" sucks!

  • @RichieT1967 so i've just erased"enhanced"that's wrong by"remixed", ok?...

  • This song was perfect just as it was. Needed no enhancing.

  • gods of music, influenced mostly all genres of modern music, they changed the way to make music

  • whats the enhanced version never heard of it and the drums sounds terrible

  • how could you.......i mean.. how - i hope by now you already smashed and burned that peice of shit casio

  • Dude... The drums fucked up the song here...

  • Did you mess around with drumming? Cuz if you did, you made a big mistake, the drumming as recorded in 1964 is a major strength of this cut.

  • my name is marguerite lusher. im a retard. its very sad actually... my own mother doesnt love me. because im rethardidoijef. (:

  • lovely song :)

  • Falso!!!

  • Why is it enhanced. It just has some fake drums on the backround.

  • I think he means that just the drums sound bigger, fatter nothing more but it's not quite a real remix, just added drums!

  • This is messed up, the additional percussion is overdone and not mixed right...sorry....

  • @icm65 maybe h just put it through an equilizer and taped i

  • I miss you John... Please check my cover channel singing No Reply.... AshAlmond

  • I really like this version, well done..!!

  • FANTASTIC!!!...thank you

  • CONGRATULATIONS, I could repeat the process with the remastered 2009, be heard MUCH BETTER.

    THANKS

  • Actually I like the concept. The Beatles did some of the drum parts on that album way too mellow. Can you please please please do the same to "What you're doing" on the same album? That song was really meant to rock harder than what Ringo did.

  • Enhaced version is some silly cunt with a crap snare drum over the top.....sad cunt

  • sounds fake

  • No matter how much music I listen to, the Beatle have always remained my favorite.

  • they are the ONLY band i listen to. 24/7

  • this is one of my favorite songsssss ever! :)

  • Is this reissued verison?

  • yea, congas did not help this song at all. and they took away from the rhythm guitar - ouch

  • It sounds much better if you are playing it on a vinyl record and your sound system has quality speakers. :)

  • God, the drums and percussion sounds amazing.

  • Innit! The drums really have a thump

  • Always will love the beatles. This song as so many touch my heart and help make me whole.

  • luv it and the song!!

  • God I love John's expressive voice in this one.

  • Comment removed

  • Reminds me of our lounge at Stableway in the 60's and my family -(smiley face).

  • Ahead of its time for '64.

  • Excellent, wouldn't expect anything less

    from these guys..Thanks Dean...

    Thanks for posting beatles4ever75 5*****!

  • Yah can't leave well enough alone can ya? Your stupid snare that sounds so poor, and ya had to add congos to it also? Oh by the way, that crash sounds just great over Ringo's cymbal. NOT! Yah just can't leave the perfection of the original song alone...can you! Obviously , you think you could do a better job than the Beatles themselves, and this song wasn't good enough for you, like the others you workd with. Hang your heads in shame.

  • I mean"enhanced"just for the stereo and to give the 1964 sound a more modern sound but indeed nobody can do better than the Beatles! "congas"were not useful indeed and do know that i never meant to do better than the fab4,the most fabulous popband ever!

  • They are NOT congas..they are BONGOS

  • @beatles754ever The most fabulous Rock band you mean.

  • Whats your problem man. honestly. Take a chill pill.

  • @theringoone

    Chill, he's not trying to say he's better than The Beatles. He's just trying his talent with remixing. It's not too professional, but it's certainly very interesting. He's clearly a fan of the Beatles and just wanted to work with one of their songs.

  • @theringoone I don't like the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. It needs more vivid color. Hey, let's RE-PAINT it!

  • never heard this mix b4

  • John's voice is amazing in this song.

  • 1:57 gives us a glimpse of what Mt. Rushmore should really be.

  • Second that!!

  • GREATEST TALENT EVER

  • i love you more than any other guy... what a bunch of liers! thats why all chics loved them... je je

  • i really love them

  • well, i never hear the beatles, but in december 2008 i hear "let it be" and the beatles mix and since 2008 to day i love the beatles

    2008 my best song was "let it be" and the beatles mix

    also another than

    please please me, we can work it out, ana and anothers............

  • the anthology version is fantastic...but i cant find it anymore...darn it...

  • Nice complex percussion there. I always knew it was there lurking WAY in the background. It's nice to hear it better

  • esta version es original o de donde sale por favor expliquenme..

  • No! esta version es una remix con beat aumentado pero la primera version era ya stereophonica en"Beatles For Sale",album de que esta version viene!

  • love your stereo version!

  • How exactly did you do this? Like how did you re-eq and remix the separate tracks?

  • version un peu + nerveuse que l'originale!...pas mal!

  • This is interesting,I can hear the percussion better,I know it's on the original,but you've done well,nice job!

  • Man that McCartney sure could sing in his younger days.

  • that was lennon singing not mccartney

  • I know - Lennon sang lead but the harmony parts, the really high parts, were McCartney. I loved all of the Beatles voices, even Ringo, but strength and range definitely was Paul's strength.

  • I agree that Paul had more range but I think john had much more charisma and quality to his voice that was penetrating. Paul's voicewas a bit more removed

  • But McCartney still sure could sing in his younger days :).

  • it sounds better than the original sound indeed! good job!

  • thx!

  • u should do more beatles songs like this, especially there early stuff

  • sounds good. What did you do?

  • i added drum just upon original one & final sound effects to increase volume & stereo!

  • So you just kinda dubbed the same song drum line perfectly on top of the existing ones which multiplied their presence? Thats cool!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more