Una zampata del John più "drammatico" nel contesto di puro beat dei primi tempi gloriosi.Paul relegato al controcanto fornisce l'alter ego "sentimentale" del talento cristallino che possiede, l'equilibrio interno della genialità Beatle emerge anche in questa No Reply,davvero superba nella sua straordinaria semplicità.
anyway, cd transfers have been remixing stuff for years now. Sgt Pepper's been remixed. jagger has talked about exile on main street sounds terrible. Would love to hear all the beatles stuff remixed, cleaned up. Also Derek & the dominos LAYLA. So many things got buried in the master. Loved that Harrison remixed all things must pass. Always hated how so many parts were lost in the final mixes, especially horns & keyboards. Grandpa will stop talking now because UTUBE makes me decipher puzzles.
@bodywhomp98 I thought it was just me: a friend gave me a copy of the anniversary release of Exile on Main Street and it doesn't sound very good. The vocals seem buried for one thing. What's wrong with people releasing stuff like this?
so, what was enhanced? Was it remixed? remastered? stuff added? Wish someone would remix lots of classic albums. Always read that this LP was rushed between tours and suffered from the process of being pressed out. Still one of my favorites, especially words of love, but critics usually slam it for the too many covers. Well, don't pressure rock stars to put out lps when they've exhausted and burned out. Problem for us in the states was capitol's release screwing up the number of tracks.
Someone mentioned the addition of bongos, I seem to recall hearing them briefly on my old, original version. But bringing the snare up in the mix to sound "hip", or "today"- please!
The song has more punch. Lets face it, the Beatles did not have the technoligy that the America's had when it came to producing albums. The talent was there, yes but the technoligy wasn't.
Actually I like the concept. The Beatles did some of the drum parts on that album way too mellow. Can you please please please do the same to "What you're doing" on the same album? That song was really meant to rock harder than what Ringo did.
Yah can't leave well enough alone can ya? Your stupid snare that sounds so poor, and ya had to add congos to it also? Oh by the way, that crash sounds just great over Ringo's cymbal. NOT! Yah just can't leave the perfection of the original song alone...can you! Obviously , you think you could do a better job than the Beatles themselves, and this song wasn't good enough for you, like the others you workd with. Hang your heads in shame.
I mean"enhanced"just for the stereo and to give the 1964 sound a more modern sound but indeed nobody can do better than the Beatles! "congas"were not useful indeed and do know that i never meant to do better than the fab4,the most fabulous popband ever!
Chill, he's not trying to say he's better than The Beatles. He's just trying his talent with remixing. It's not too professional, but it's certainly very interesting. He's clearly a fan of the Beatles and just wanted to work with one of their songs.
I know - Lennon sang lead but the harmony parts, the really high parts, were McCartney. I loved all of the Beatles voices, even Ringo, but strength and range definitely was Paul's strength.
I agree that Paul had more range but I think john had much more charisma and quality to his voice that was penetrating. Paul's voicewas a bit more removed
Una zampata del John più "drammatico" nel contesto di puro beat dei primi tempi gloriosi.Paul relegato al controcanto fornisce l'alter ego "sentimentale" del talento cristallino che possiede, l'equilibrio interno della genialità Beatle emerge anche in questa No Reply,davvero superba nella sua straordinaria semplicità.
Perfidia4ever 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Time to stop crying try Naughty women benaughtyman.info
laksikakanchana 11 months ago
anyway, cd transfers have been remixing stuff for years now. Sgt Pepper's been remixed. jagger has talked about exile on main street sounds terrible. Would love to hear all the beatles stuff remixed, cleaned up. Also Derek & the dominos LAYLA. So many things got buried in the master. Loved that Harrison remixed all things must pass. Always hated how so many parts were lost in the final mixes, especially horns & keyboards. Grandpa will stop talking now because UTUBE makes me decipher puzzles.
bodywhomp98 11 months ago
@bodywhomp98 I thought it was just me: a friend gave me a copy of the anniversary release of Exile on Main Street and it doesn't sound very good. The vocals seem buried for one thing. What's wrong with people releasing stuff like this?
thelovesickdrifter 8 months ago
so, what was enhanced? Was it remixed? remastered? stuff added? Wish someone would remix lots of classic albums. Always read that this LP was rushed between tours and suffered from the process of being pressed out. Still one of my favorites, especially words of love, but critics usually slam it for the too many covers. Well, don't pressure rock stars to put out lps when they've exhausted and burned out. Problem for us in the states was capitol's release screwing up the number of tracks.
bodywhomp98 11 months ago
Sexy Asian women **busizz4me.info**
jhklgyui 1 year ago
@jhklgyui What the Hell sexy Asian women have to do with this song?...NO REPLY!!!!!
marchairodus 11 months ago
i like this remiX! beatles 4 EVER@
Gian04BeaTLes 1 year ago
Someone mentioned the addition of bongos, I seem to recall hearing them briefly on my old, original version. But bringing the snare up in the mix to sound "hip", or "today"- please!
JoeSzilagy 1 year ago
you just put in some drums and other crap.
tedobrien98 1 year ago
this is great!!! Listen not to other mean mr. mustard beatle fans.
InstantMagic 1 year ago
Number 2 rule: Don't add to a song and say it's rare. YOU PISS PEOPLE OFFF
capitolemiproducer 1 year ago
@capitolemiproducer Who said"It's rare"?...I didn't!
beatles754ever 1 year ago 5
@capitolemiproducer Well, it's seems that YOU are the one who is pissed off !!
robin14669 1 year ago
@capitolemiproducer it doesnt say rare...it says remixed. ie the sound quality.
alansalt 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
loved it. can i ask u for the mp3?
loner0502 1 year ago
loved it.
can i ask you for the mp3 version?
loner0502 1 year ago
nice job
eslubin 1 year ago
This isn't "enhanced" it's remixed...or more honestly, butchered. Please remove this and don't ever do anything like this again.
LeCutter 1 year ago
@LeCutter Yes i agree with you, that's rather remixed than enhanced! Beatles754ever should've called it remix!
RichieT1967 1 year ago
Oh man, it's not too bad, but you know that there's a stereo version.
TheOneBeatleManiac 1 year ago
The song has more punch. Lets face it, the Beatles did not have the technoligy that the America's had when it came to producing albums. The talent was there, yes but the technoligy wasn't.
kubrick681 1 year ago
This sucks.
Becsabc 1 year ago
@BecsabcI'd rather say that the word"enhanced" sucks!
RichieT1967 1 year ago 2
@RichieT1967 so i've just erased"enhanced"that's wrong by"remixed", ok?...
beatles754ever 1 year ago
This song was perfect just as it was. Needed no enhancing.
0hNoNotHimAgain 1 year ago
gods of music, influenced mostly all genres of modern music, they changed the way to make music
LAUMAN777 1 year ago
whats the enhanced version never heard of it and the drums sounds terrible
Sgtbeatles13 1 year ago 2
how could you.......i mean.. how - i hope by now you already smashed and burned that peice of shit casio
Mshine2 1 year ago
Dude... The drums fucked up the song here...
mamoru86 1 year ago 2
Did you mess around with drumming? Cuz if you did, you made a big mistake, the drumming as recorded in 1964 is a major strength of this cut.
thishereguitar 1 year ago 2
my name is marguerite lusher. im a retard. its very sad actually... my own mother doesnt love me. because im rethardidoijef. (:
XxKakashi101 1 year ago
lovely song :)
nudgeheartleg 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i hate the drums
nightcrawler511 2 years ago
Falso!!!
soan1989 2 years ago
Why is it enhanced. It just has some fake drums on the backround.
artmonkid 2 years ago 2
I think he means that just the drums sound bigger, fatter nothing more but it's not quite a real remix, just added drums!
tobbytommy 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah to be blunt this sucks
WhiteRubberSoul 2 years ago
This is messed up, the additional percussion is overdone and not mixed right...sorry....
icm65 2 years ago
@icm65 maybe h just put it through an equilizer and taped i
workstrength 1 year ago
I miss you John... Please check my cover channel singing No Reply.... AshAlmond
AshAlmond 2 years ago
I really like this version, well done..!!
MrKimu 2 years ago 2
FANTASTIC!!!...thank you
crow812009 2 years ago 3
CONGRATULATIONS, I could repeat the process with the remastered 2009, be heard MUCH BETTER.
THANKS
MUSICAROCK101 2 years ago
Actually I like the concept. The Beatles did some of the drum parts on that album way too mellow. Can you please please please do the same to "What you're doing" on the same album? That song was really meant to rock harder than what Ringo did.
happenstanceman 2 years ago
Enhaced version is some silly cunt with a crap snare drum over the top.....sad cunt
noahwayne 2 years ago
sounds fake
wilhelm1974 2 years ago
No matter how much music I listen to, the Beatle have always remained my favorite.
WrexsouI 2 years ago 5
they are the ONLY band i listen to. 24/7
roadrunner29788 2 years ago 2
this is one of my favorite songsssss ever! :)
bph11224 2 years ago 3
Is this reissued verison?
Scorpian16 2 years ago
yea, congas did not help this song at all. and they took away from the rhythm guitar - ouch
cshargeit 2 years ago
It sounds much better if you are playing it on a vinyl record and your sound system has quality speakers. :)
zzzmac 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol this aint real
ak40kevn 2 years ago
God, the drums and percussion sounds amazing.
Cantormatis 2 years ago
Innit! The drums really have a thump
kosmad 2 years ago
Always will love the beatles. This song as so many touch my heart and help make me whole.
msmomo2u 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the beatles are in our DNA
trust me friend you will never see anything like it again
and to those who missed out or don
t think so say...
i say FUCK YOU! just listen you dumb mother fucking music morons!
instantonewest 2 years ago
luv it and the song!!
collcoll13 2 years ago
God I love John's expressive voice in this one.
westfield90 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
287750km 2 years ago
Reminds me of our lounge at Stableway in the 60's and my family -(smiley face).
Butterfly1Blue 2 years ago
Ahead of its time for '64.
youtubbs67 2 years ago
Excellent, wouldn't expect anything less
from these guys..Thanks Dean...
Thanks for posting beatles4ever75 5*****!
Ghostorchid2 2 years ago 2
Yah can't leave well enough alone can ya? Your stupid snare that sounds so poor, and ya had to add congos to it also? Oh by the way, that crash sounds just great over Ringo's cymbal. NOT! Yah just can't leave the perfection of the original song alone...can you! Obviously , you think you could do a better job than the Beatles themselves, and this song wasn't good enough for you, like the others you workd with. Hang your heads in shame.
theringoone 2 years ago 4
I mean"enhanced"just for the stereo and to give the 1964 sound a more modern sound but indeed nobody can do better than the Beatles! "congas"were not useful indeed and do know that i never meant to do better than the fab4,the most fabulous popband ever!
beatles754ever 2 years ago 6
They are NOT congas..they are BONGOS
pirrung123 2 years ago 3
@beatles754ever The most fabulous Rock band you mean.
SamMurrayVideos 1 year ago
Whats your problem man. honestly. Take a chill pill.
010293haziq 2 years ago
@theringoone
Chill, he's not trying to say he's better than The Beatles. He's just trying his talent with remixing. It's not too professional, but it's certainly very interesting. He's clearly a fan of the Beatles and just wanted to work with one of their songs.
Tobunshi 1 year ago 2
@theringoone I don't like the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. It needs more vivid color. Hey, let's RE-PAINT it!
StvMcQueen1 1 year ago
never heard this mix b4
flibideegibbit 2 years ago
John's voice is amazing in this song.
ColdMountainWater 2 years ago 11
1:57 gives us a glimpse of what Mt. Rushmore should really be.
130166wsjr 2 years ago 20
Second that!!
TheOriginalJoeFriday 2 years ago
GREATEST TALENT EVER
jba2323 2 years ago 12
i love you more than any other guy... what a bunch of liers! thats why all chics loved them... je je
azulalivia 2 years ago
i really love them
mariandy09 2 years ago 3
well, i never hear the beatles, but in december 2008 i hear "let it be" and the beatles mix and since 2008 to day i love the beatles
2008 my best song was "let it be" and the beatles mix
also another than
please please me, we can work it out, ana and anothers............
mlorosem 2 years ago
the anthology version is fantastic...but i cant find it anymore...darn it...
marijanie333 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JOHN LENNON GENIUS @@
benemuzik 2 years ago 2
Nice complex percussion there. I always knew it was there lurking WAY in the background. It's nice to hear it better
kirbygene 2 years ago
esta version es original o de donde sale por favor expliquenme..
lujansalas 3 years ago
No! esta version es una remix con beat aumentado pero la primera version era ya stereophonica en"Beatles For Sale",album de que esta version viene!
tobbytommy 2 years ago
love your stereo version!
mayday1937 3 years ago 11
How exactly did you do this? Like how did you re-eq and remix the separate tracks?
secretagntman242 3 years ago
version un peu + nerveuse que l'originale!...pas mal!
theo2537 3 years ago 5
This is interesting,I can hear the percussion better,I know it's on the original,but you've done well,nice job!
plasticsoulman66 3 years ago 27
Man that McCartney sure could sing in his younger days.
LEROTHECAT 3 years ago 8
that was lennon singing not mccartney
kangalic 3 years ago 5
I know - Lennon sang lead but the harmony parts, the really high parts, were McCartney. I loved all of the Beatles voices, even Ringo, but strength and range definitely was Paul's strength.
LEROTHECAT 3 years ago 11
I agree that Paul had more range but I think john had much more charisma and quality to his voice that was penetrating. Paul's voicewas a bit more removed
kangalic 3 years ago 7
But McCartney still sure could sing in his younger days :).
rule914 2 years ago
it sounds better than the original sound indeed! good job!
tobbytommy 3 years ago 2
thx!
beatles754ever 3 years ago
u should do more beatles songs like this, especially there early stuff
westernrebel89 3 years ago 3
sounds good. What did you do?
frstcutt 3 years ago 11
i added drum just upon original one & final sound effects to increase volume & stereo!
beatles754ever 3 years ago
So you just kinda dubbed the same song drum line perfectly on top of the existing ones which multiplied their presence? Thats cool!
crabbigail2007 3 years ago