I play for fun, winning is just a nice bonus to add. But ofcourse you would like to win as much as you can on tournaments. I never complain when I lose (as long as I had my fun). At least these guys try to be creative, respect for that all the way !!!! Go Swedes !!!! By the way, freakin' awesome deck ! it's simply sick !
i dont kno the new ajani is pretty good, i like garruk and lilian and one elspeth and chandra is a great finisher ... liliana would be better against control while chandra better against creature decks, my opinion
Adding a removing counters to the 'walker are the cost to play the ability. Think of it as "Add 1 counter to Garruk: Untap up two target lands." When you play the ability, obviously the Rings never see the cost, only the ability itself when copying.
I guess you have to take into account the skill of the player, the tweaking of his build, and finally the skill and deck of the opponent. It looks like it could be good. If it were me, though, I'd probably be running Firespouts, since their just so good, and 1 mana less than Wrath.
with this deck i feel thought seize and vess make it good for a control match, also try a build with U in it too, tez can fetch all sorts of artifacts (and rings) and jace is never bad as a card drawing machine and a fog + card when your behind :)
Seems to me 3 of each planeswalker would be better rather than sarkhan and elspeth being single. although i wonder whether this was financial as elspeth and sarkhan are neither cheap nor easy to come by.
If i had these card i would probably play it once at fnm just to shake things up a bit.
But ye i think that if you can get any 3 planeswalkers out you stand a good chance to win seeing u buy so much time while your opponent tried to deal with it. Fun but a bit lame as well.
These guys are such hacks. Anybody can win with a midas deck, much less a PLANESWALKER based deck. Obviously the only way to get anywhere in a pro tourney is with a somewhat broken deck, but this demonstrates a lack of creativity and an overabundance of money. The swan deck that won the Australian nationals at least had a clever combo behind it. This is just total bull.
You'd actually be surprised how many options you have when you have a few planeswalkers out. There's definitely some skill involved when playing the deck, like every deck. Most people were playing Faeries and such, and if you don't think that requires "an overabundance of money" you're wrong. Bitterblossoms and Cryptic Commands are expensive. Props to these guys for choosing to play a deck which *isn't* obviously good (chosen because it's *fun*).
Good on these guys it's nice to see someone having fun and trying something new!
PapaPiccolo 2 months ago
I play for fun, winning is just a nice bonus to add. But ofcourse you would like to win as much as you can on tournaments. I never complain when I lose (as long as I had my fun). At least these guys try to be creative, respect for that all the way !!!! Go Swedes !!!! By the way, freakin' awesome deck ! it's simply sick !
:D
NuclearPony 1 year ago
would anyone know what the standard (2010) equivalent of this deck would be now?
HandOfQuaid 2 years ago
"...and then you win." Haha.
maximus2357 2 years ago
haha, this is like 'what if swissgaar from dethklok played magic' awesome
xandrewxjonesx 2 years ago
I like how it only runs 1 ofs the Mythic PWs, except the promo Ajani.
snarfoogle 3 years ago
lol i only have 6 different planeswalkers now, i dont think i want to trade in my tezzeret for an elspeth anyways
vickielynns 3 years ago
this deck is so sick
fourstatefav 3 years ago
its good man, really ... had to beilive but it is
fourstatefav 3 years ago
chandra nalaar's last effect + rings of brighthearth= dead opponent just because people don't use her doesn't mean she sucks that much
thetrigger41 3 years ago
does anyone know the rules to planewalkers
JuanofArk 3 years ago
yeah
fourstatefav 3 years ago
NO BITCH
sausebio 3 years ago
it'd be better with liliana+elspeth+Garruk
mightyturisas 3 years ago
i dont kno the new ajani is pretty good, i like garruk and lilian and one elspeth and chandra is a great finisher ... liliana would be better against control while chandra better against creature decks, my opinion
fourstatefav 3 years ago
ok when you use the ring of Brighthearth
on the planswalker do you just copy the abillty and get no counters or do you get to copy it and get more counters on the planswalkers...
spmandmtgr 3 years ago
Adding a removing counters to the 'walker are the cost to play the ability. Think of it as "Add 1 counter to Garruk: Untap up two target lands." When you play the ability, obviously the Rings never see the cost, only the ability itself when copying.
jvdthwip 3 years ago
most interesting deck ever
polkadotedfish 3 years ago
I saw somebody playing it this weekend, it was really bad.
bigblopper 3 years ago 2
bad as in it sucked or bad as in it took people by suprise.
komatos 3 years ago
sucked. although it was playing against what's probably it's toughest matchup, fairys.
bigblopper 3 years ago
I guess you have to take into account the skill of the player, the tweaking of his build, and finally the skill and deck of the opponent. It looks like it could be good. If it were me, though, I'd probably be running Firespouts, since their just so good, and 1 mana less than Wrath.
jvdthwip 3 years ago
with this deck i feel thought seize and vess make it good for a control match, also try a build with U in it too, tez can fetch all sorts of artifacts (and rings) and jace is never bad as a card drawing machine and a fog + card when your behind :)
NivMizzetFiremind 3 years ago
looks fun but at the same time looks pretty expensive, still loving the deck and that chandra is seeing some play
starwarsmaniac93 3 years ago
it is expensive. it looked at the cost for it. came out to almost $400
movieman423 3 years ago
Seems to me 3 of each planeswalker would be better rather than sarkhan and elspeth being single. although i wonder whether this was financial as elspeth and sarkhan are neither cheap nor easy to come by.
If i had these card i would probably play it once at fnm just to shake things up a bit.
But ye i think that if you can get any 3 planeswalkers out you stand a good chance to win seeing u buy so much time while your opponent tried to deal with it. Fun but a bit lame as well.
JashiNeXe 3 years ago
Fy fa an va töntigt!
WildRicochet 3 years ago
What are the three cards in the top right corner?
radonikolesko 3 years ago
At first I was like "wat"
But then I lol'd
FreshmanThesis 3 years ago
I wish I knew why they only played 1 of some and 4 of the harder to protect planeswalkers.
nathones 3 years ago
the one guy looks like his speech is dubbed
DariusKnightshade 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These guys are such hacks. Anybody can win with a midas deck, much less a PLANESWALKER based deck. Obviously the only way to get anywhere in a pro tourney is with a somewhat broken deck, but this demonstrates a lack of creativity and an overabundance of money. The swan deck that won the Australian nationals at least had a clever combo behind it. This is just total bull.
BobGoo289 3 years ago
Unfortunately, there aren't prizes for creativity in magic. Or building on a budget. Play to win or don't complain if you lose.
Eibb 3 years ago 17
Lack... of creativity? Because this deck was really obvious as long as you had the money?
ShogunCharlie 3 years ago 2
Shorter BobGoo289: "I'm a scrub."
XBlackFlagX 3 years ago
You'd actually be surprised how many options you have when you have a few planeswalkers out. There's definitely some skill involved when playing the deck, like every deck. Most people were playing Faeries and such, and if you don't think that requires "an overabundance of money" you're wrong. Bitterblossoms and Cryptic Commands are expensive. Props to these guys for choosing to play a deck which *isn't* obviously good (chosen because it's *fun*).
jvdthwip 3 years ago
Is it just me or is the sound off by a half a second?
shadowhunter483 3 years ago 5
Yep, it is off.
doomtomb3 3 years ago