Slavery and Abolitionism in Canada Part I

[dadecountyhustler305]

Why does Canada try and trick itself into believing that there slavery history is sooooo much different than America's. When its 100% exactly the same. Canada = British empire.

[canadarox14]

@dadecountyhustler305 I'd like to argue that it wasn't 100% the same. In Canada, slave owners were never a significant part of the population. In the States, especially in the south, slavery was so popular that it took much longer to remove than in Canada or England. I don't think Canadians try to cover up this history. Sadly, most Canadians aren't educated enough about Canadian history to even know there's a history of slavery to think about. So it's not some kind of scam, it's just ignorance.

[PatchesRips]

@dadecountyhustler305 Because it was nothing like the same. The number of slaves in Canada was comparatively insignificant. They were never a major source of agricultural or industrial labour. I'm not saying people here were angels; just that a slave economy never took root because it never made sense.

That said, it DID make sense in other parts of the Empire, and even so, it was abolished across the Empire over a generation before the US Civil War. So it wasn't the same.

[miles101457]

The first requisite of the happiness of the people is the abolition of religion. - Karl Marx

[kemetkush]

nice video

[SirFact]

Nice video. I like it.. i just find it odd when people from southern United States always call us more racist then them but thats just messed up.

[walkertexasranger33]

@SirFact ive never heard an american calling canadians racist let alone those from the south

[ultradumbass]

one interesting source i read, is that canadians for the most part were against slavery from the beginning. most that even had slaves, were british and french aristocrats, and that in many cases, wealthy canadian business men, would often times buy slaves at a market than soon legalize their release.

[VeryPalpableHit]

Yes, you're absolutely right. It was much easier for people to recognize the evil of slavery when their economy didn't depend on it.

[ultradumbass]

and the south could of probably had a better economy if they had let them be equal because it gets moreloyalty to your country, better morale and they will become healthier workers.

[VeryPalpableHit]

I agree. I think they just looked at the immediate benefits and not the bigger economic picture.

[walkertexasranger33]

@ultradumbass i dont quite understand one part. are you saying businessmen would buy slaves and let them free before they were bought by other people to be used as slaves?

[walkertexasranger33]

@ultradumbass nvm i just got confused cause you said than instead of then and soon instead of rather

[ultradumbass]

@walkertexasranger33 the thing is the history of slavery is much more complex than what liberals give. they give one part saying whites enslaved africans. in fact the way the african slave trade started in the first place was the african dictators and kings of the time were taking political prisoners and either killing them or selling them to europeans themselves in exchange for weaponry. also the term slave comes from slavs, because whites were being persecuted during the same period of time.

[walkertexasranger33]

@ultradumbass nvm=nevermind. thanks for telling me that stuff but I've known it all for quite a few years now

[Qilunik]

excellent research of this Slavery in Canada. did i say it right anyways good video

[VeryPalpableHit]

Thank you very much!

[SupportWeThePeopleKB]

This is excellent research. I would recommend both parts for history students of North America. You have described the complexities of slavery debates with remarkable clarity and let the moral issues emerge on their own. Bravo!

[VeryPalpableHit]

Thank you very much. I appreciate your feedback. I'm glad you enjoyed it.

[coolanim]

this sucks

[VeryPalpableHit]

Insightful. Thanks.

Now run along and watch your cartoons.

[ashburnhouse]

You're right. This is garbage.