just to be honest bro..it really kinda slow..i used to my 89 gt with cobra intake..pullys-full exhuast system trans go shift kit w stock ignition and internals..it was running better than this,...still great car bro
gay as fuck.. worried about 24000 views who gives a fuck if the video was that gay if you gonna do a vid from the inside at least drive faster than my fucking grandma
bro your oil pressure was dropping if you notice in this video. i use to own one and my main issue with this car was the Oil Pressure and the Water Pump. Turns out i needed a high volume water pump and the oil pump kept snapping the oil pump shaft
yea it all depends on weight to hp ratio the lotus cars barely make 200 and some go over 200 but they don't weight too much so they are pretty quick cars.
it depends on the weight of the car, the gearing, and whos driving it.. the prelude is not really fast by any means but it could go toe to toe with the notorious 5.0. its all about power to weight ratio
omg can the fucking honda owners quit fucking talking about racing from a roll, every race in the worlds starts from a dead stop.....play along or get the fuck out.
ps. that mustang was actually slower than what it should be at.
they have no HP trq aint winnin races. if it did you should ebat alot of cars but we all know trq doesnt win races fact. id take 350HP and 275 lb of trw then vice versa. :) go import
Youve got to be able to know how to use the torque before you can say it doesnt win races. I raced a bolt on ls1 from a dig 3 times and won once. I have stock heads & make 280whp/360wtq. He makes about 340+whp/???wtq. I have a 3.73 gears and he has stock. I have the gears for tq multiplication and I can shift fast. btw the other times he didnt pass me until about 80+ mph and we ran to 110-115 on the street from a dig. he has slicks, LT's full exhaust, pullies, short throw, suspension, intake etc
excuse me I meant drag radials not slicks. but anyways I was surprised I even got 1, I should have gotten my ass handed to me hard all three times. Yeah he pulls like a train on top, but if it takes till 120 mph to pass me whats the point? neither of us are trapping that in the 1/4. hp is very important it accounts for a lot of top end, but you need the torque to be able to have it pull hard in every gear. Hence why I was able to get him. I also beat 2 lt1 vettes and a supercharged jag that nite
im not saying toriqw isnt important if you ar racing from 0-70 mph itll help alot. without a doubt. but im telling you after 70-75 its HP and gears not trq , it sa FACT that trq helps you off the line and HP and geasr win races. because if you say trq wins races i will tell you the s2000 "trqless wonder right"? beats a mustang GT with 260HP and 305lb og trq while the s2k has only 153. dont gimmie the bullshit its only 2880 lb while the stang is like 3k-3200. stop listening to shelby the moron
Dude, Im not saying hp isnt important. Obviously it is if the ls1 pulled on me up top like a train. Why? cause he had atleast 50 more hp at the wheels! Im not listening to anyone but myself and im speaking from experience. The stang is not 3k fuckin pounds either. my parents have a 2001 bullit and dry it weighed in at just under 3500lbs. The new ones are even heavier. The honda is 700lbs light with only 20hp less, yeah I think that weight makes up for the lack up power. The honda also revs 8k.
You and I both know, comparatively the honda is a dog vs the mustang in the low rpms, because of the torque. These two cars are set up to do totally opposite things. The honda is designed for the track, plain and simple = high revving, very light, and the power is all up top. You gonna drive around at 5k+ rpm just to be in the powerband on the street? dont think so. The stang makes torque off idle, aka stoplight warrior. I wouldnt argue the s2k being faster up top, but the stang wins on street.
that wasnt a 5.0 cobra engine. that was prolly just the intake plake or the intake itself from a cobra. the cobra 5.0 had a better intake, bigger injectors, GT40 heads and theres more and it all brung the 5.0 up to 235hp. some say that it was underrated though. the GT originally had 225hp but during the time of the 93 cobra it dropped to 205hp.
lets compare a 1989 tuned port injected 305 against a 302 h.o from a mustang! the 305 had 215hp/290ft-lbs (1989 iroc-z) a 1989 mustang 5.0 ho had 225/300ft-lbs! thats nearly the same thing... the camaro was a LITTLE slower cuz they weight more but they handles much more than a mustang!
i compare a 302 chevy against a 302 ford!!! that's a very fair comparaison! a 1969 chevy 302 could make 450+HP with a cross ram intake, headers,solid lifters. all that with stock heads,stock bottom end! at a screaming 8500-9000 rpm's...! those 302 chevy motors where true race motors from the factory that could run head to head with stock big block muscle cars.!
Your a moron. Shelby offer's a 725hp 5.4 in the Super Snake. I beleive thats factory endorsed. Seem's the ford's number outmatch any other stock chevy number.
LOL!!! you need a supercharger to compete with a naturally aspirated chevy?? lol! now everybody knows that ford needs forced induction to compete with chevys and mopars!!! all the recent mustangs (400+hp) needs a fucking supercharger.. that's a little silly!! chevy put a supercharger on a 6.2 liter and it makes 638 HP!!!!! YES 638 HP.. not 400...! ford?? bhahahahahhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
That's like saying real big screen TV's must be analog with a tube. I' just a better, lighter, more efficient way to get the same result. Your holding on to something that's not worth keeping man.
The 1985 Mustang GT's were sold as Mustang GT Cobra's in Canada. I own one, as did my dad who bought his in 85' FACTORY DIRECT from ford. Just remeber American = GT... Canada = GT Cobra. So as far as I care, or anyone else cares, they will be known as the Mustang GT Cobra. Id post pics, but youtube doesnt allow links.
I see that your oil pressure was on the low side of the gauge. My 89 5.0 is almost always on the low side except when It gets above 4,000 rpm. Are all of them like that?
It's funny how you say ricers...I've had three mustangs now, and one camaro. Also a cougar. I'm just not a close minded sob like you. Also all my mustangs would rape yours at half throttle. Just watch some of my cougar videos. At the same speed I'd beat you two gears higher...
just to be honest bro..it really kinda slow..i used to my 89 gt with cobra intake..pullys-full exhuast system trans go shift kit w stock ignition and internals..it was running better than this,...still great car bro
almeer93 2 months ago
gay as fuck.. worried about 24000 views who gives a fuck if the video was that gay if you gonna do a vid from the inside at least drive faster than my fucking grandma
1joemalone 1 year ago
For a 89 stock 5.0 it can go pretty fast imo. but is the intake after market or is it an actual Cobra...?
srrymonkey 1 year ago
LOL you must not get out that much if you think that your car is fast, That's pretty sad.
The05ZX10R 1 year ago
ahahha keep all the hater comments coming!! makes me look better!!! almost 24000 views
quetipp01 2 years ago
bro your oil pressure was dropping if you notice in this video. i use to own one and my main issue with this car was the Oil Pressure and the Water Pump. Turns out i needed a high volume water pump and the oil pump kept snapping the oil pump shaft
adiosk8r91 2 years ago
50+ at 2k is a lil to much for my likeing. 10lbs per 1000rpm is all u need.
1969pontiac406 2 years ago
kinda low oil pressure. my 5.0 runs about 50psi+ once its above about 2k rpm
MWSnow153 2 years ago
do your self a favor & get a new cam, and do alittle head work. . . . .
o56kid 2 years ago
dude...that was so fast..did you see my wifes Fusion come by? Yeah she was going around you like a school bus LMFAO!!! that was lame ....
dalemllns 2 years ago 7
@dalemllns hahahahhahaha!! I thought i saw a geo metro too!!
Jamez64 1 year ago
haha nice beginner pic. lol
mitch9521 2 years ago
Kinda Slow Bro
mongoose063 2 years ago 8
this things sucks lol slow POS
sinisterseven8 2 years ago
yea it all depends on weight to hp ratio the lotus cars barely make 200 and some go over 200 but they don't weight too much so they are pretty quick cars.
izai2 2 years ago
That car is slow as hell LMAO
fatracing20 2 years ago
5.0s suck
prosurfer2222 2 years ago
Comment removed
alanpvw 2 years ago
it depends on the weight of the car, the gearing, and whos driving it.. the prelude is not really fast by any means but it could go toe to toe with the notorious 5.0. its all about power to weight ratio
xxGriffonxx 2 years ago
most civics only have between 100-125hp unless its an si. prelude is pretty much the only other honda coupe that comes factory with 200hp
xxGriffonxx 2 years ago
more like 165 hp but if you put type r stickers and a giant wing you can get at least 500hp...maybe 600 hp if you have led,s.
watchforfinger 2 years ago 2
my honda will win stock for stock against a 5.0 from a roll but not from a dig because unfortunatly i have not so much torque
watchforfinger 2 years ago
omg can the fucking honda owners quit fucking talking about racing from a roll, every race in the worlds starts from a dead stop.....play along or get the fuck out.
ps. that mustang was actually slower than what it should be at.
ShkeeShkee 2 years ago 2
isnt it running kinda low oil pressure to be at full throttle?
R3DBULLX23 2 years ago
The presseure gages work half the time on these cars
orbitofdoom16 2 years ago
mine is the same way but once you get above 5,000 rpms then it climbs
mustang50dominates 2 years ago
...waste of time..
flamegs23 2 years ago
its faster than my geo
noxvet 2 years ago
Jeeze get some oil pressure.
christofurg 2 years ago
That's pretty slow dude. - 5.0 Mustang owner.
christofurg 2 years ago
they have no HP trq aint winnin races. if it did you should ebat alot of cars but we all know trq doesnt win races fact. id take 350HP and 275 lb of trw then vice versa. :) go import
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
jesus. Learn how to spell. Holy shit it was like reading ricer language or something oh wait
jts1991 2 years ago 3
pureadrenaline25 - that is the most ignorant and assinine comment I've ever read. Educate yourself, then end yourself. Kids these days, sheesh.
christofurg 2 years ago
Youve got to be able to know how to use the torque before you can say it doesnt win races. I raced a bolt on ls1 from a dig 3 times and won once. I have stock heads & make 280whp/360wtq. He makes about 340+whp/???wtq. I have a 3.73 gears and he has stock. I have the gears for tq multiplication and I can shift fast. btw the other times he didnt pass me until about 80+ mph and we ran to 110-115 on the street from a dig. he has slicks, LT's full exhaust, pullies, short throw, suspension, intake etc
jjsk8erkid 2 years ago
excuse me I meant drag radials not slicks. but anyways I was surprised I even got 1, I should have gotten my ass handed to me hard all three times. Yeah he pulls like a train on top, but if it takes till 120 mph to pass me whats the point? neither of us are trapping that in the 1/4. hp is very important it accounts for a lot of top end, but you need the torque to be able to have it pull hard in every gear. Hence why I was able to get him. I also beat 2 lt1 vettes and a supercharged jag that nite
jjsk8erkid 2 years ago
im not saying toriqw isnt important if you ar racing from 0-70 mph itll help alot. without a doubt. but im telling you after 70-75 its HP and gears not trq , it sa FACT that trq helps you off the line and HP and geasr win races. because if you say trq wins races i will tell you the s2000 "trqless wonder right"? beats a mustang GT with 260HP and 305lb og trq while the s2k has only 153. dont gimmie the bullshit its only 2880 lb while the stang is like 3k-3200. stop listening to shelby the moron
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
Dude, Im not saying hp isnt important. Obviously it is if the ls1 pulled on me up top like a train. Why? cause he had atleast 50 more hp at the wheels! Im not listening to anyone but myself and im speaking from experience. The stang is not 3k fuckin pounds either. my parents have a 2001 bullit and dry it weighed in at just under 3500lbs. The new ones are even heavier. The honda is 700lbs light with only 20hp less, yeah I think that weight makes up for the lack up power. The honda also revs 8k.
jjsk8erkid 2 years ago
You and I both know, comparatively the honda is a dog vs the mustang in the low rpms, because of the torque. These two cars are set up to do totally opposite things. The honda is designed for the track, plain and simple = high revving, very light, and the power is all up top. You gonna drive around at 5k+ rpm just to be in the powerband on the street? dont think so. The stang makes torque off idle, aka stoplight warrior. I wouldnt argue the s2k being faster up top, but the stang wins on street.
jjsk8erkid 2 years ago
the s2000 has 250... weights 2850, while the mustang weighs 3400
random fact
also did you know the ls7 7.0 makes nearly twice as much power per pound that the fc20 does...
what really matters in performance hp/pound not hp/ displacement
mageac 2 years ago
well what kind of mustang because i know 5.0s are like 2900 or somthing like that
98camaro1 2 years ago
the new ones weigh more then the 5.0s
mageac 2 years ago
o i thought u meant 3400 for the 5.0s
98camaro1 2 years ago
um ur fuckin retarded da s2000 has 236 hp n its a f22c
prosurfer2222 2 years ago
um u fuckin retard 236 250... who cares its 14 hp....
in that case Honda is retarded as well, because the f20c is a 1.997L and the f22c is a 2.157, those idiots
btw f20c is the 1st s2000 engine, the f22 is the same with a longer stroke , less rpm more torque
mageac 2 years ago
if yo0u care to realize its a 200mph gauge. if you actually count the 80-100 and the 80-100 comapred to yours, its quik.
randumbuller 2 years ago
yeah when they reintroduced the 302
262Blazer 2 years ago
Yawn
IndyRamMan 3 years ago
BBK Intake is junk, Performer RPM II is twice the intake that BBK junk is.
sleak112 3 years ago
thats not that fast
stangin209 3 years ago
LMAO Thats slower than dogshit!
fatracing20 3 years ago
might want to find the nearest gas station the 5.0 is a gas hog
adiosk8r91 3 years ago
nice foxbody =) ...
is there a big difference between the
"5.0 Cobra" engine(like in this vid)
and a "5.0 H.O." ???
(Hp,acceleration,torque) btw
3O2MuStAnG 3 years ago
that wasnt a 5.0 cobra engine. that was prolly just the intake plake or the intake itself from a cobra. the cobra 5.0 had a better intake, bigger injectors, GT40 heads and theres more and it all brung the 5.0 up to 235hp. some say that it was underrated though. the GT originally had 225hp but during the time of the 93 cobra it dropped to 205hp.
1SirCarlton 3 years ago
they didnt drop it to 205 in 93 the lowest the modern 5.0 has ever been rated at is 215
262Blazer 3 years ago
sure thats fast?
IndyRamMan 3 years ago
you don have a lot of oil pressure do you?
fordman500 3 years ago
never trust the factory Oil PSI gauge.
gokuren 3 years ago
geez my stock foxbody is as fast as that.
you gotta do a 0-60 vid.
after 60 they are pretty slow.
its still cool though.
Shaun589 3 years ago
best motor in the world right there...
got1320 3 years ago
ive got to say, my modded '95 3.8L hits 120 within the time of whatever you just showed lol..
thesargster4 3 years ago
my dick make 1000+ horsepower...
Grow up... 1992... Were in 2008... Find me a 1992 Chevy still with the original engine still banging and racing..
Tools..
MiMiK1985 3 years ago
lol that was weak bro
Bhrnandez 3 years ago
that was a slow 89 5.0
FREEFLESHNBONE 3 years ago
lets compare a 1989 tuned port injected 305 against a 302 h.o from a mustang! the 305 had 215hp/290ft-lbs (1989 iroc-z) a 1989 mustang 5.0 ho had 225/300ft-lbs! thats nearly the same thing... the camaro was a LITTLE slower cuz they weight more but they handles much more than a mustang!
peter355camaro 3 years ago
i compare a 302 chevy against a 302 ford!!! that's a very fair comparaison! a 1969 chevy 302 could make 450+HP with a cross ram intake, headers,solid lifters. all that with stock heads,stock bottom end! at a screaming 8500-9000 rpm's...! those 302 chevy motors where true race motors from the factory that could run head to head with stock big block muscle cars.!
peter355camaro 3 years ago
Your a moron. Shelby offer's a 725hp 5.4 in the Super Snake. I beleive thats factory endorsed. Seem's the ford's number outmatch any other stock chevy number.
sabbathofcolorblack 3 years ago
LOL!!! you need a supercharger to compete with a naturally aspirated chevy?? lol! now everybody knows that ford needs forced induction to compete with chevys and mopars!!! all the recent mustangs (400+hp) needs a fucking supercharger.. that's a little silly!! chevy put a supercharger on a 6.2 liter and it makes 638 HP!!!!! YES 638 HP.. not 400...! ford?? bhahahahahhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
peter355camaro 3 years ago
I'm going to have to agree... i really hope your oil gage isn't working.
big411daddy 3 years ago
i thought that you were being serious when you said fast 5.0. but now that i know it was a joke i understand!
dragracer70 3 years ago
love the warning sticker at the beginning! you should show the top speed next time! nice car though
gofast001 4 years ago
i know!!!! 300ft-lbs too...
peter355camaro 4 years ago
my 98 lincoln continental with the 4.6 could almost walk that,
but dont get me wrong good vid
gearhead291 4 years ago
my foxbody is almost stock, and it's a bit quicker then that.
terribleone393 4 years ago
i love how my 4.6L gt mustang would eat that 5.0 lol
phsjr 4 years ago
at least that mustang is much more muscle car than your tiny modular powered stang!! real v8 muscle uses PUSHRODS !!!!!
peter355camaro 4 years ago
That's like saying real big screen TV's must be analog with a tube. I' just a better, lighter, more efficient way to get the same result. Your holding on to something that's not worth keeping man.
CarlosElPeruacho 4 years ago 2
DONT FORGET!!!! the LS1 is 350hp soo....
peter355camaro 4 years ago
this thing is pretty slow man. honestly, im tryin to be nice about it. i mean i have a v6 mustang and youre making that seem fast.
DeGO6 4 years ago
thats thing is slow as shit my ls1 will walk that thing to the moon
kvbsmhisback 4 years ago
love the beginning. -- who said Fords don't last? 146k + miles!
myrage17 4 years ago
The 1985 Mustang GT's were sold as Mustang GT Cobra's in Canada. I own one, as did my dad who bought his in 85' FACTORY DIRECT from ford. Just remeber American = GT... Canada = GT Cobra. So as far as I care, or anyone else cares, they will be known as the Mustang GT Cobra. Id post pics, but youtube doesnt allow links.
Nymbler 4 years ago
it was a bad switch... replaced it with an autometer gauge and was running 50-60 psi
quetipp01 4 years ago
I see that your oil pressure was on the low side of the gauge. My 89 5.0 is almost always on the low side except when It gets above 4,000 rpm. Are all of them like that?
mustang50dominates 3 years ago
My 85' GT Cobra can do 120km/h in 2nd gear... stock. lol
Nymbler 4 years ago
Whats the song in the beginning?
NewfZ 4 years ago
colors
quetipp01 4 years ago
my ada had a 1989 ford mustang gt 5.0 had 450 hp
we hit 114 in 3rd gear it was insane
slipknot565 4 years ago
My integra was my slowest car so far and it would still rape that thing.
rb26dett32 4 years ago
DAYUM. I was looking to buy a 5.0 for $600 today but I think I'll keep my 70HP AE86 because its not much slower. lol j/k
TKDWolf 4 years ago
that isn't fast, so please don't say it is. And the oil pressure gauge is most likely broken. They never actually work.
rb26dett32 4 years ago
ok i bet your integra is so flipping fast.... i will eat that thing for breakfast... i hate ricers
quetipp01 4 years ago
It's funny how you say ricers...I've had three mustangs now, and one camaro. Also a cougar. I'm just not a close minded sob like you. Also all my mustangs would rape yours at half throttle. Just watch some of my cougar videos. At the same speed I'd beat you two gears higher...
rb26dett32 4 years ago
hahah! love the sigh in the begining. Sounds beautiful....whats you exhaust setup?
freeloader700 5 years ago
whats with no oil pressure
sandcobra 5 years ago
i dont kno why but it was low that day?
quetipp01 5 years ago