How can I participate in any 'militia' activity if I am not allowed to own a gun and keep it in my home?
The english language is not that complicated.....in the main body of the Constitution it mandates that the government will be maintaining the professional armed forces
It also says that the people have a right to be armed....so that way it's not just the professional army/government.
I find it funny that the democrats this guy has endorsed in the past, has EXTENDED the patriot act, funded saudi arabia with BILLIONS of dollars of military equipment to blow up their neighbors, AND had a 30,000 troop surge in afghanistan. Yet they consider all this constitutional? Wake up America, Ron Paul 2012.
You do not need a gun to kill a lot of people. Do a search on youtube put this in search (Arrest in Tokyo Mass Stabbing). He stabbed 17 people in just a couple minuets if he knew where to stab all would have bleed to death in two minuets. A school hall between class think of how many he could have stabbed.
I would also like to point out that people such as public officials and diplomats will never have a need for firearms. They are running around in huge estates with a private security force who protect them. What do people think their security forces use? Marshmallow launchers? No, they use guns. If it's good enough for a president, or movie star, or even a police officer, it should be good enough for you. You are your last defense. If our gov. passes a law, you have a duty to be a criminal.
People need guns to protect themselves not only from criminals on the streets, but criminals in public service. All these idiots say whatever the public wants them to say to get elected and then never make good on any of it. All these idiots get a little power, and then want more. Everyone has seen it, whether you work at McDonald's or corporate america. Some little piss ant gets a taste of power and wants more. Power corrupts men. No man is immune to it. YOU NEED GUNS. PRACTICE GUN SAFETY.
if guns kill people, mattresses cause pregnancy. FROM MY COLD, GUNS SHOT RESIDUE COVERED HANDS. I obey the law. When it becomes illegal for me to defend myself, I will be a criminal.
you stupid moron, criminals love guys like you. you make sure that they dont get shot on the job. because the only people you control with gun control laws are law abiding citizens. criminals dont give a damn about laws they will get thier guns either way
you don't no anything you should kill your self you little fuck it is people like you that are destroying this country you need to pull your fat head out of your ass and see the truth about the second amendment and stop polluting the world with your lies.
HAHAHA cry all you want about saying 2nd amendment says guns are only for "Organized Militia" The supreme court say otherwise, and the supreme court holds more water then some fat fuck on the internet.
No it doesn't. The Second Amendment says ". . . the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." It starts talking about militias but then goes on to talk about the right of the People, not the militia. Every other time in the U.S. constitution and in Locke's philosophy and in the idea of popular sovereignty and all the other fundamentals of this government, the People refers to citizens. Why is it now suddenly different here? If they meant militia, they would have said it.
Well, what did I get wrong? I'm saying that the Supreme Court can be wrong. The Supreme Court has made a ton of idiotic decisions in the past and constantly overrules its own decisions. I'm saying that its interpretation on this issue seems arbitrary and stated my reasoning. You go and say that I'm wrong simply because the Supreme Court is the Supreme Court. That's clearly pretty retarded reasoning.
OK in my original post, I was saying no matter how you (as in the asshole who made this video) cry about guns are for militia only, the supreme court has said otherwise, as in the supreme court is saying guns are for the people/citizens. And judging from your first reply, I think you agree with me unless I read your first reply wrong.
But no, I have to have guns, because I'm the one who rakes in the cash by selling my guns to criminals and insane people and then to fearful citizens having to protect themselves against the former.
And then I buy politicians with that money I make who introduce legislation that will keep people extremely rich and extremely poor and lots of unstable people out on the streets and without a safety net, thus keeping the demand for my product up.
I don't think Cenk's point was for or against guns. He was merely pointing out how Giuliani had flip-flopped on the issue and how powerful the gun manufacturer lobby is through the NRA, whether that's for better or for worse...
This Cenk guy is obviously nothing more than a liberal internet attack dog. I also dont care much for Republicans either, but I WILL tell you this. He can talk all day long about gun control, it doesnt make any difference. The debate is a moot point. Reason: simple logic. Unless you intend to support a policy of KILLING all private citizens that own guns, how indeed do you intend to disarm them all. I know that they can have my guns when they pry them from my cold....dead....fingers.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Well, the problem is that the gun manufacturers over-saturate the market with guns and ammo of the most heinous kind, because that is how they make their money -- the same way that, say, the fast food industry kills people prematurely with the most delicious yet unhealthy food imaginable. Or the cigarette industry...
There's always someone who profits from the country being rife with crime, so they can sell their death to both criminals and fearful, law-abiding people in spades...
AT LEAST THEY HAVE THE FREEDOM OF CHOICE! Lawful citicens will give up arms... criminals will not, making their job of robbing, raping and murdering the people who just gave up their arms, a whole hell of a lot easier.
REALLY? So people who hunt, protect themselves from tyrany and responsible hobbyists will just stop buying and shooting at ranges because crime rate went down?
Well, you don't really need assault rifles or concealed handguns to hunt.
As for freedom fighters, they couldn't do anything with their M16s and AK47s anyway against Bradleys rolling down their cul-de-sacs. Domestic rebels use fertilizer bombs and IEDs these days.
And as for hobbyists, why should they be allowed to collect guns if I'm not allowed to collect deadly viruses in my basement, even though I promise never to use them against people either? It's just not fair...
Very very few crimes are committed with "assault rifles." And concealed handguns are just fine too.
And also, according to you, though I doubt the situation would ever come about, I should lie down and take it when the Government decides to break it off in my ass? Sorry, pacifism isn't for everyone.
And finally, your last point is stupid. What would kill more people, a single man with guns, or a deadly virus? Use your head for christ's sake.
An assault rifle is a rifle with a selective firing mechanism, these guns have been heavily regulated by the government, and production was banned on them in 1986. Concealed handguns have not one thing to do with hunting, nor does the second amendment. Fair? The Constitution, nor Bill of Rights guarantee you the right to keep a deadly virus in your basement. Not one time in history has gun control been proven to equal crime control. The exact opposite in fact. Conduct some research.
I think you're thinking of the machine gun ban of 1986. Assault rifles is a load of bull crap that Bill Clinton made up to take semi-automatic rifles out of the hands of honest people. It's just a semi-automatic rifle with a flash surpressor and a collapsable stock. Luckily the ban is gone, even if Obama is stupid enough to support a ban that didn't work, since assault weapons are involved in less than 1% of crimes.
The right to guns isn't about hunting. It's about protecting yourself as an individual and protecting society as a whole against the government. People don't need a reason to own a gun (such as hunting, or collecting) it's the 2nd freaking amendment in the bill of rights. Second only to the freedom of religion and speech. Guns are merely tools, but good people need the same tools that bad guys have to protect themselves and their family when they need to.
@OolTube02 Its not about hunting you fucking idiot, I don't know why you stupid fucks think guns are all about hunting... and Assault Rifles are select-fire fully automatic and have ceased production in 1986 and you have to fill out a lot of extra paperwork for them you dumbass. And concealed handguns aren't for hunting you stupid fucking retard, they are for protecting yourself incase someone tried to mug you when you were walking down the street or something. stupid fuck....
@Crow762 Don't argue with stupidity. They know what the value of firearm ownership to us. Else they wouldn't even care. Just look at what the North Koreans did to 100,000 Prespytarians in 1954. Marched them, their kids & wives into huge ditches. What the 3rd Reich did to Jews. Anyone who says that good people don't own guns have a plan for moral conservatives in America. It is repeated many times in history. Never play nice with this kind of evil. Support the NRA & ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND.
Weren't The Young Turks an elite group of progressives that were social Darwinist and aided in bringing about the genocide of almost a million Armenian christians...?
I share your frustration with Giuliani. Most republican constituents did, and that's why bombed so badly in the primaries. How we wound up with U-turn McCain I'll never know. I'm leaning toward Bob Barr this year.
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. xSEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS (sorry dont wanna die!)
The supposed "liberals" who want to get rid of gun rights because of shootings aren't any better than 'conservatives' who want to suppress rights against unreasonable search and seizure/ surveillance, or due process in the face of terrorism.
you guys are not seeing the whole picture. the media does reports on gun violents so that people like you and i say Hey! WE NEED TO GET RID OF GUNS FOREVER! this is what the government wants us to think! when gun regulations are passed it will be the end, when they start taking guns away its over guys, just look at katrina! perfect reason to take guns away! any disaster will give a good reason to take guns away, the media is brainwashin you guys! do not be fooled!!! look at UK, controled country
I don't agree with your anti-gun stance, but you're right about Giuliani. He doesn't care about liberty in general, and he's probably only pretending to care about the 2nd amendment. We need a President who understands and supports the entire Bill of Rights, and Giuliani is about as far from that ideal as you can get.
I have been a law abiding gun owner in the State of New York for a long time. He treated us like crap. He is a fake with a capital F. He will never get my vote
That guy is a fucken moron, ALL males 17-54 ARE IN THE MILITA!!!
There is the orgainzed milita-the NG and navel milita which is a federal force.
The unorgainzed milita is is 17-about 54(varies by state). The milita men in the rev. were the unorgainzed milita. And the first major gun control law was in 1934, if the founding fathers did mean the right was for THE PEOPLE they would have banned guns then.
Look up Milita def on the gov's website dumbass before talking.
Ah great a guy from Air America, Ive been wanting to ask this SOOO long, Why on Air America which I thought was supposed to hold mostly Libertarian views, why dont any of the shows EVER talk about Ron Paul? on WTPRN every show there talks about RP because they see the importance of getting real change and helping a guy like him get in office, but you guys at AA just seem to have no passion about what your saying or dont care about a chance to effect it for real this time
if 100 million americans want RON PAUL we will get him... the powers that be will not have a choice.. this is why our founding fathers gave us the second amendment.. if the government gets out of hand and becomes a tyrant, the Amercan citizen can and should take up arms against it to get back to a constitutional government.. why else do you think that the government wants gun control.
This is like a side show. You make some funny faces and "ohh my God" and "Can you believe this?" but dude, "where's the beef"?You sound convincing but where are the quotes and verifiable facts? You might be making good points but without the basics it's just bitching.
This guy will have to mention 9/11 in every single sentence he utters in public if he wants a chance to be the Republican nominee. Frankly, I'd rather see John McCain representing the Republicans because he's awesome and has first hand war experience.
dont worry guys, Guiliani is gonna WIN. mainly because he's gona be the next puppet of American govt. and the 'powers at be'. what a better person to chose? This dumbnut Guiliani is gona worsen our situation!
We are now spending $3 billion a week in Iraq alone, occupying a country that had nothing to do with the tragedy that sparked this orgy of militarism. - Robert Scheer
There should be a law against using 9/11 for propoganda purposes or for your personal benefit! I'm not even joking...the more the politicians use 9/11 as a way to get elected or defeat political enemies, the more they cheapen this tragedy. September 11 should be day to remember and NOT a propoganda tool!
Is there anyone in the media more annoying than this guy? I think not...
wnyvideo 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FIREARM RELATED DEATHS IN THE US EVERY YEAR = 29,569(average)
TOBACCO RELATED DEATHS EACH YEAR IN THE US = 440,000(average)
ciggaretes kill more people in the US than guns, but you dont need to have a special permit and other back ground check to buy a ciggarete
angelodzn07 8 months ago
ban guns
gape2011 9 months ago
@gape2011 Ban your twinkies chubby
SouthSurreyMilitia 7 months ago
How can I participate in any 'militia' activity if I am not allowed to own a gun and keep it in my home?
The english language is not that complicated.....in the main body of the Constitution it mandates that the government will be maintaining the professional armed forces
It also says that the people have a right to be armed....so that way it's not just the professional army/government.
RebelGuy95 11 months ago
I find it funny that the democrats this guy has endorsed in the past, has EXTENDED the patriot act, funded saudi arabia with BILLIONS of dollars of military equipment to blow up their neighbors, AND had a 30,000 troop surge in afghanistan. Yet they consider all this constitutional? Wake up America, Ron Paul 2012.
PANT3RA 11 months ago
I wonder who funds this stupid show.....
Dmac11a666 1 year ago
fuck gun control!!!
fuck you stupid assholes that are anti gun.
AMERICANS CAN OWN GUNS BECAUSE IT IS OUR RIGHT YOU FUCKING COMMIES!!
churchofruss 1 year ago 9
@churchofruss hey commies hate gun control too
TheZeonMovement1 3 months ago
Air America failed because of DUMBASSES like this. Good!
evolutionist101 2 years ago 4
@evolutionist101
True enough LOL
Antiworld23 1 year ago
This anchor is really obnoxious.
imanidiot911truther 2 years ago 3
You do not need a gun to kill a lot of people. Do a search on youtube put this in search (Arrest in Tokyo Mass Stabbing). He stabbed 17 people in just a couple minuets if he knew where to stab all would have bleed to death in two minuets. A school hall between class think of how many he could have stabbed.
samatention 2 years ago 2
I would also like to point out that people such as public officials and diplomats will never have a need for firearms. They are running around in huge estates with a private security force who protect them. What do people think their security forces use? Marshmallow launchers? No, they use guns. If it's good enough for a president, or movie star, or even a police officer, it should be good enough for you. You are your last defense. If our gov. passes a law, you have a duty to be a criminal.
stabbyronnie 2 years ago
People need guns to protect themselves not only from criminals on the streets, but criminals in public service. All these idiots say whatever the public wants them to say to get elected and then never make good on any of it. All these idiots get a little power, and then want more. Everyone has seen it, whether you work at McDonald's or corporate america. Some little piss ant gets a taste of power and wants more. Power corrupts men. No man is immune to it. YOU NEED GUNS. PRACTICE GUN SAFETY.
stabbyronnie 2 years ago
if guns kill people, mattresses cause pregnancy. FROM MY COLD, GUNS SHOT RESIDUE COVERED HANDS. I obey the law. When it becomes illegal for me to defend myself, I will be a criminal.
stabbyronnie 2 years ago
Politicians are SOOOOOO full of shit, and will say anything they need to win, period.
Scrap5000 2 years ago
you stupid moron, criminals love guys like you. you make sure that they dont get shot on the job. because the only people you control with gun control laws are law abiding citizens. criminals dont give a damn about laws they will get thier guns either way
avrahamsemail 2 years ago 4
You know they won't show the clip of him saying anything.
dshct 2 years ago
you don't no anything you should kill your self you little fuck it is people like you that are destroying this country you need to pull your fat head out of your ass and see the truth about the second amendment and stop polluting the world with your lies.
12816 2 years ago
Perhaps Guliani is suffering from menopause.
TruthFan 3 years ago
If the pilot of the plane on 9/11 had a gun it probably would have changed the outcome of that day for the better.
ab1tchslap 3 years ago 2
HAHAHA cry all you want about saying 2nd amendment says guns are only for "Organized Militia" The supreme court say otherwise, and the supreme court holds more water then some fat fuck on the internet.
GuyBelowFails 3 years ago
No it doesn't. The Second Amendment says ". . . the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." It starts talking about militias but then goes on to talk about the right of the People, not the militia. Every other time in the U.S. constitution and in Locke's philosophy and in the idea of popular sovereignty and all the other fundamentals of this government, the People refers to citizens. Why is it now suddenly different here? If they meant militia, they would have said it.
efletch91 3 years ago
I'm going to go out on a limb and assume you didn't read my post too carefully.
GuyBelowFails 3 years ago
Well, what did I get wrong? I'm saying that the Supreme Court can be wrong. The Supreme Court has made a ton of idiotic decisions in the past and constantly overrules its own decisions. I'm saying that its interpretation on this issue seems arbitrary and stated my reasoning. You go and say that I'm wrong simply because the Supreme Court is the Supreme Court. That's clearly pretty retarded reasoning.
efletch91 3 years ago
OK in my original post, I was saying no matter how you (as in the asshole who made this video) cry about guns are for militia only, the supreme court has said otherwise, as in the supreme court is saying guns are for the people/citizens. And judging from your first reply, I think you agree with me unless I read your first reply wrong.
GuyBelowFails 3 years ago
I am firmly pro-gun, if that is what you are trying to say.
efletch91 3 years ago 2
Pro-gun, as in we the people should be allowed to own guns, and are against gun control right? Yes if that's the case we are on the same side.
GuyBelowFails 3 years ago
Then we are on the same side.
efletch91 3 years ago
No, you're really opposed!
Go ahead, duel each other on the town square, please...
OolTube02 2 years ago
OolTube02, I think hat you're a bit over aggressive, it's people like you who shouldn't have guns.
But people like me, elfetch91 and guybelowfails, are smart, caring citizens, who have a right to defend themselfs against pople like you.
1lovesoni 2 years ago
You can call me Ool.
But no, I have to have guns, because I'm the one who rakes in the cash by selling my guns to criminals and insane people and then to fearful citizens having to protect themselves against the former.
And then I buy politicians with that money I make who introduce legislation that will keep people extremely rich and extremely poor and lots of unstable people out on the streets and without a safety net, thus keeping the demand for my product up.
Life is good for me...!
OolTube02 2 years ago
I don't think Cenk's point was for or against guns. He was merely pointing out how Giuliani had flip-flopped on the issue and how powerful the gun manufacturer lobby is through the NRA, whether that's for better or for worse...
OolTube02 2 years ago
This Cenk guy is obviously nothing more than a liberal internet attack dog. I also dont care much for Republicans either, but I WILL tell you this. He can talk all day long about gun control, it doesnt make any difference. The debate is a moot point. Reason: simple logic. Unless you intend to support a policy of KILLING all private citizens that own guns, how indeed do you intend to disarm them all. I know that they can have my guns when they pry them from my cold....dead....fingers.
Chains99 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well, the problem is that the gun manufacturers over-saturate the market with guns and ammo of the most heinous kind, because that is how they make their money -- the same way that, say, the fast food industry kills people prematurely with the most delicious yet unhealthy food imaginable. Or the cigarette industry...
There's always someone who profits from the country being rife with crime, so they can sell their death to both criminals and fearful, law-abiding people in spades...
OolTube02 2 years ago
AT LEAST THEY HAVE THE FREEDOM OF CHOICE! Lawful citicens will give up arms... criminals will not, making their job of robbing, raping and murdering the people who just gave up their arms, a whole hell of a lot easier.
neemguy81 2 years ago
But the question is, why do you have so many criminals in the first place and why is acquiring firearms such an easy endeavor for them?
It's because selling guns to both criminals and to people requiring protection from criminals is such a lucrative business.
If I were a gun merchant I'd never want the crime rate to go down ever...
OolTube02 2 years ago
REALLY? So people who hunt, protect themselves from tyrany and responsible hobbyists will just stop buying and shooting at ranges because crime rate went down?
neemguy81 2 years ago
Well, you don't really need assault rifles or concealed handguns to hunt.
As for freedom fighters, they couldn't do anything with their M16s and AK47s anyway against Bradleys rolling down their cul-de-sacs. Domestic rebels use fertilizer bombs and IEDs these days.
And as for hobbyists, why should they be allowed to collect guns if I'm not allowed to collect deadly viruses in my basement, even though I promise never to use them against people either? It's just not fair...
OolTube02 2 years ago
Very very few crimes are committed with "assault rifles." And concealed handguns are just fine too.
And also, according to you, though I doubt the situation would ever come about, I should lie down and take it when the Government decides to break it off in my ass? Sorry, pacifism isn't for everyone.
And finally, your last point is stupid. What would kill more people, a single man with guns, or a deadly virus? Use your head for christ's sake.
Rilkir 2 years ago
An assault rifle is a rifle with a selective firing mechanism, these guns have been heavily regulated by the government, and production was banned on them in 1986. Concealed handguns have not one thing to do with hunting, nor does the second amendment. Fair? The Constitution, nor Bill of Rights guarantee you the right to keep a deadly virus in your basement. Not one time in history has gun control been proven to equal crime control. The exact opposite in fact. Conduct some research.
icecoldbeerr 2 years ago
I think you're thinking of the machine gun ban of 1986. Assault rifles is a load of bull crap that Bill Clinton made up to take semi-automatic rifles out of the hands of honest people. It's just a semi-automatic rifle with a flash surpressor and a collapsable stock. Luckily the ban is gone, even if Obama is stupid enough to support a ban that didn't work, since assault weapons are involved in less than 1% of crimes.
chaosofhumanity 2 years ago
The right to guns isn't about hunting. It's about protecting yourself as an individual and protecting society as a whole against the government. People don't need a reason to own a gun (such as hunting, or collecting) it's the 2nd freaking amendment in the bill of rights. Second only to the freedom of religion and speech. Guns are merely tools, but good people need the same tools that bad guys have to protect themselves and their family when they need to.
chaosofhumanity 2 years ago
@OolTube02 Its not about hunting you fucking idiot, I don't know why you stupid fucks think guns are all about hunting... and Assault Rifles are select-fire fully automatic and have ceased production in 1986 and you have to fill out a lot of extra paperwork for them you dumbass. And concealed handguns aren't for hunting you stupid fucking retard, they are for protecting yourself incase someone tried to mug you when you were walking down the street or something. stupid fuck....
Crow762 11 months ago
@Crow762 Don't argue with stupidity. They know what the value of firearm ownership to us. Else they wouldn't even care. Just look at what the North Koreans did to 100,000 Prespytarians in 1954. Marched them, their kids & wives into huge ditches. What the 3rd Reich did to Jews. Anyone who says that good people don't own guns have a plan for moral conservatives in America. It is repeated many times in history. Never play nice with this kind of evil. Support the NRA & ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND.
theprimemeridians 1 month ago
i'm feeling naughty at the moment k
coolguy11897 3 years ago
Weren't The Young Turks an elite group of progressives that were social Darwinist and aided in bringing about the genocide of almost a million Armenian christians...?
likeitiz 3 years ago
I share your frustration with Giuliani. Most republican constituents did, and that's why bombed so badly in the primaries. How we wound up with U-turn McCain I'll never know. I'm leaning toward Bob Barr this year.
SOAHCSOAHCSOAHC 3 years ago
ur a fucking dumb ass liberal stfu 2nd ammendment is great and helps countries
zhman93 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. xSEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS (sorry dont wanna die!)
blaklabel13 3 years ago
The supposed "liberals" who want to get rid of gun rights because of shootings aren't any better than 'conservatives' who want to suppress rights against unreasonable search and seizure/ surveillance, or due process in the face of terrorism.
(liberalswithguns dot com)
(progunprogressive dot com/?p=3)
jotunobsidianeyes 3 years ago
Guliani is a F#*cking deushe! first he is a stupid anti gun liberal prick, then he lies through his teeth about it!
TAVOR7 3 years ago 3
you guys are not seeing the whole picture. the media does reports on gun violents so that people like you and i say Hey! WE NEED TO GET RID OF GUNS FOREVER! this is what the government wants us to think! when gun regulations are passed it will be the end, when they start taking guns away its over guys, just look at katrina! perfect reason to take guns away! any disaster will give a good reason to take guns away, the media is brainwashin you guys! do not be fooled!!! look at UK, controled country
JUKIO01 4 years ago 5
The guns will get buried in the backyard just like the guns in Australia.
PJThatOthersMayLive 3 years ago
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
bigangelsfan1234 4 years ago 2
"Taking my gun away because I might shoot someone is like cutting my tongue out because I might yell `Fire!' in a crowded theater." Peter Venetoklis
bigangelsfan1234 4 years ago 2
as fare as i know giuliani is a big bull shiter and fake as republican fuck giuliani
noeld08 4 years ago
I don't agree with your anti-gun stance, but you're right about Giuliani. He doesn't care about liberty in general, and he's probably only pretending to care about the 2nd amendment. We need a President who understands and supports the entire Bill of Rights, and Giuliani is about as far from that ideal as you can get.
joel7687 4 years ago 2
I have been a law abiding gun owner in the State of New York for a long time. He treated us like crap. He is a fake with a capital F. He will never get my vote
3meninaroom 4 years ago 3
That guy is a fucken moron, ALL males 17-54 ARE IN THE MILITA!!!
There is the orgainzed milita-the NG and navel milita which is a federal force.
The unorgainzed milita is is 17-about 54(varies by state). The milita men in the rev. were the unorgainzed milita. And the first major gun control law was in 1934, if the founding fathers did mean the right was for THE PEOPLE they would have banned guns then.
Look up Milita def on the gov's website dumbass before talking.
GotIt123 4 years ago 2
Ah great a guy from Air America, Ive been wanting to ask this SOOO long, Why on Air America which I thought was supposed to hold mostly Libertarian views, why dont any of the shows EVER talk about Ron Paul? on WTPRN every show there talks about RP because they see the importance of getting real change and helping a guy like him get in office, but you guys at AA just seem to have no passion about what your saying or dont care about a chance to effect it for real this time
Wolfsheim23 4 years ago
Guliani, if you are reading this, fuck you!
Fuck you in the ass with no lube, ya gimp!
T850CSM101a1676 4 years ago 4
if 100 million americans want RON PAUL we will get him... the powers that be will not have a choice.. this is why our founding fathers gave us the second amendment.. if the government gets out of hand and becomes a tyrant, the Amercan citizen can and should take up arms against it to get back to a constitutional government.. why else do you think that the government wants gun control.
SPACE3200 4 years ago 3
We were just curious if you had any fully auto weapons?
MotherLandSecurity 4 years ago
Go back to your pen sheeple, with your trough and nice warm hay. We don't need people like you when we are trying to change this country.
"Those who say it cannot be done shouldn't interrupt those already doing it."
Mark72188 4 years ago
Sen. Coburn Standing Alone In Holding Up The Veterans Disarmament Act
-- Coburn needs your help right away!
go to Gun Owners of America right now to help.
Hetzer250 4 years ago
I thought air america filed for bankrupcy. Is this guy for real?
sebdsouza 4 years ago
If you think the Second Amendment is about arming the government, take a look at the videos from Burma.
JiveDadson 4 years ago
This is like a side show. You make some funny faces and "ohh my God" and "Can you believe this?" but dude, "where's the beef"?You sound convincing but where are the quotes and verifiable facts? You might be making good points but without the basics it's just bitching.
coldgyn 4 years ago
Well said. We need to uphold all of the amemdments. Please view searchword wilburjr-thanks.
wilburjr 4 years ago
This guy will have to mention 9/11 in every single sentence he utters in public if he wants a chance to be the Republican nominee. Frankly, I'd rather see John McCain representing the Republicans because he's awesome and has first hand war experience.
Korolev61 4 years ago
dont worry guys, Guiliani is gonna WIN. mainly because he's gona be the next puppet of American govt. and the 'powers at be'. what a better person to chose? This dumbnut Guiliani is gona worsen our situation!
faithnallah 4 years ago 2
We are now spending $3 billion a week in Iraq alone, occupying a country that had nothing to do with the tragedy that sparked this orgy of militarism. - Robert Scheer
generatrix999 4 years ago
Rudy is so full of it. This was a great piece!
The truth of the matter is ... we need ALL 10 amendments ... not just ones that one party finds convenient for their cause.
AgentGrn 4 years ago 5
Thanks for showing the Ghoulie as the perverse and selfish piece of shit that it is,and for losing your Turkish accent.
Highly articulate and commendable.Keep up the good work.
krugar67 4 years ago
"these guys are an absolute joke" AMEN TO THAT CENK !!
RustyCyler 4 years ago
There should be a law against using 9/11 for propoganda purposes or for your personal benefit! I'm not even joking...the more the politicians use 9/11 as a way to get elected or defeat political enemies, the more they cheapen this tragedy. September 11 should be day to remember and NOT a propoganda tool!
lebaneseameer 4 years ago 13
"Joo-lie-oni" has much bigger issues that he's been tied to - more criminal acts than you'd believe.
Forget gun control - he allowed the 9/11 Firefighters who died to be used as ASPHALT!
What a damned crook. 9/11 didn't change his view of people - they are roadfill to him!
antiklaus 4 years ago 2
omg this this guy has lied and tricked his way into hell by now....
shadwhearts 4 years ago
EXCELLENT VIDEO! Thank you for pointing out this hypo!
Lungyao1 4 years ago 3
you nailed it. "President of 9/11" is a good one.
DonkeyofHeaven 4 years ago 9
Obviously, obviously. Of coooooourse. You're 100% right, 0% wrong
lowerself 4 years ago