interesting. if there supposedly is no bosons, then what initially gives protons their mass? is it some kind of information awareness in non locality, that observes waves and collapses them into particles that have mass?
Please search for "Speedy neutrino mystery likely solved, relativity safe after all" on dvice. I cite "Researchers at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands went and crunched the numbers on how much relativity should have effected the experiment, and found that the correct compensation should be about 32 additional nanoseconds on each end, which neatly takes care of the 60 nanosecond speed boost that the neutrinos originally seemed to have."
i wonder if hitler-y could move that fast out of office someday very soon ! hahahaha ! i know she "hops too" that fast when the cfr snaps fingers at her !
Rubbish where is the validity in this Einsteins light speed is in a vacuum all Cern tests are through solid matter. Sound travels 10x in water a logical conclusion would be sub atomic particles would travel faster through increased density . Lets find a new Einstein cos you dimwits are nowhere
Were you beat up as a child by football players? Cause really, that last comment was just unnecessary. Especially because one game of football has all the physics that you need to know.
Confusing dark matter and dark energy some one ? And saying that it doen't exist without explaining the gravitational effect we observed only confirms your total ignorance of a subject you so arrogantly talk about...
You'll explain us how we KNOWW earth is flat in a video soon to come.
@TheZenoEffect Secondly, the results at CERN have not been independently verified. If they are verified, they would not necessarily mean that special relativity is wrong. Neutrinos could be taking a shortcut through space via extra dimensions, and thus may not really be travelling above the speed of light. The Standard Model is not "going down in flames", rather it will need to be modified. The LHC is a success so long as it is collecting data.
@TheZenoEffect Of course you won't believe what I'm saying. As to your claims about the Higgs Boson not existing, you could be incidentally right. But being incidentally right is very different than being right with strong theoretical reasons. Without solid theoretical reasons behind a claim, you have nothing but a lucky guess. That you have confused dark matter with dark energy suggests that you have no training in physics, as does your rejection of well-founded theories.
There is tremendous evidence that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate due to dark energy. Dark energy is what is causing space to expand. Dark matter was postulated for entirely different reasons than to explain why the universe was expanding. The existence of dark matter was deduced in the 1930's when it was found that the rotational velocities of galaxies remained constant and didn't vary as a function of radial distance.
Warning this guy is full of shit it's not fit, post your credentials or atleast prove you understand the fundamentals, other than reading out of some cheap book.
@MikDonsen Yes, this guy is a total crackpot. He doesn't understand what he's talking about, and his videos are simply worthless. He doesn't understand the evidence for either Dark Matter or Dark Energy as well as he thinks he does.
@TheZenoEffect i believe it was far easier in the days when we had no internet. a time when we had to cross check things sitting in a library. gore and others like him seen a chance to make money as well as change laws to support what's now called agw. he had help from the globalists too. the media, and from other world leaders. gore kept it going even when his college professor recanted his study findings about co2. he lies about his meetings with ken lay in the 90's. gore, a major asshole !
@TheZenoEffect well, yes, like before, in canada. zbignew brzezinski said that the people of the world are politically awake like never before in world history, and are looking the elite in the eyes. this rings loud and true. gerald celente said before that the information is here. it's here on the web that tells the tail of what the globalists are up to. gore is a small time punk within the goal of global governance. but all this strays from the subject here in your vid. thanks for your time.
@TheZenoEffect hahaha ! excellent !! "hitler-y clinton" !!! i'll have to find ways to include this in my conversations with others ! hahaha ! i hope that more people will ask about the connections some of these republican "hopefuls" have with cfr, big pharma, ect. like how in the hell is romney linked with the tea party when he's clearly big government and a poster boy for the cfr. and perry being the same for big pharma and bilderberg, and the nafta highway ect. these blowjobs gotta go !!
@TheZenoEffect So, if I well understand, you propose that CERN is hidding the failure to discover Higg's boson by making some noise with an old theory. However, I'm not sure that suggesting that quantum decorrelation has a link with particle velocity theoretical limit. In one hand, we deal with one information, then we deal with phase velocity. In the other hand, we deal with matter, a packet of particles which then has a group behavior. I think OPERA really discovered something.
CERN a "failure?" If CERN results overturn the Standard Model that could hardly be considered a failure; it would be monumental. It's like saying the Hubble telescope would be a failure if it looked to the edge of the universe and instead of seeing what was expected we saw, say, a brick wall. that's not a failure, it's new and exciting information! Having said that, I'll bet a dollar to a donut CERN just got their clocks set wrong.
@TheZenoEffect I think you are being a little prematurely cynical here - if you bothered to watch their webcast it is clear that a massive effort was made to falsify their results over a significant period. I may not be as informed as you but I don't think this has anything to do with the anomalies of quantum physics - space time can expand faster than the speed of light as we have observed with velocities of distant galaxies but that does not violate Einstein? If anything ... continued
@TheZenoEffect - PART 2 - If it is not a measurement problem (most likely using GPS etc one would thing gives a higher margin of error than +/- 10 nanoseconds) then it has been feasably mooted that it is a consequence of neutrino's taking a short cut through a different dimension ... I have also heard that dark matter may be mass or gravity reaching us from a different dimension also thought to comprise WIMPS ... this may be an interesting line of enquiry given the lack of data on dark matter?
@TheZenoEffect Thanks for your response but not to belabor a point ... I think you are mixing up the repulsive Dark Energy force with Dark Matter, which has been posited as the extra invisible mass holding the galaxies together. Dark Energy is indeed an explanation for an expanding universe. The point that I was making is that I read (Michio Kaku) that Dark Matter may be gravity reaching us from another dimension, which struck me as coincidental given the extra dimension explanation for CERN.
So smart after the fact? BTW, instanteneous is not the same as particles MOVING faster than speed of light. Instantaneous is not same as MOVING throught space.
I think this video is some kind of vendeta. You are enemy, not ally of science.
I wouldn't want to be a physicist right now! I think they already did the testings multiple times to minimize the margin of error. Physics is so complicated but it just got more complicated now... However, the fact that it was neutrinos that traveled faster than light makes me feel skeptical about it. Specially because we know so little about them and they're pretty evasive too.
Yes it is true that instantaneous speed you are describing is proven to be true...it is overall useless since you cannot transfer any information faster than the speed of light. So it's not like physicists shrugged Aspect's findings under the rug, just that sending information with the speed of light is far more efficient than using the instantaneous speed.
so how is instantanious a speed? its not like infinite mps or at least more than 186,282 mps is it? because if its not, it actually is surpsising if something is actually moving at more than 186,282 mps, asuming e=mc² is right.. im not some kind of educated physics guy, im just wondering, because to me it sounds like thats something more or less completely different, and it sounds as well like you dont like CERN, because as they didnt proof higgs boson to exist yet, whos to say it doesn't ?
@TheZenoEffect ok, first off, nice explanation of instantaneous, but as you said, no distance is traveled, which, of course would in theory be faster than light, but the point of what they seem to have accomplished is that something actually moves a distance at more than the speed of light, which would be what i meant with "two completely different things" and i think thats something that hasent been done before, right?
All of you ignorant people, who know nothing about physics and think that you understand most complex theories which take many years at university to learn and understand, are jealous of those who understand it. So you are trying to make all sorts of argument to prove that scientists are wrong, because they don't have evidence for existence of higgs and some other theories yet. You people should shut up and let the scientists explore, because they are responisble for todays technology you use
Dark Matter is an assumption of this unknown yet matter that have mass but you can't detect it , the God Particle is this Unknown yet particle that gives matter it's mass ,also an assumption , and none of them haven't been discover and you assume there's nothing like that at all cause you're a fucken genius or something ?
just STFU bro you are just another looser that some physics professor somewhere fucked your grad. degree
Like the commentary.! .I just cant wait to hear the new (some resurrected) theories. I suspect that CERN is just trying to find out the truth . Theory is just theory..after all.
@TheZenoEffect The 'Big Bang' theory will fall, but it will take the discovery of matter older than the universe itself..Personaly I think the 'big bang' has happened before . We can all agree that the universe is expanding from a common source, but I dont think it was a single point. More like a critical mass of matter being squeezed
by gravity. I think the universe then expands ,accelerating at first ,untill the propelling energy runs out,or gets absorbed by receptive matter. ran out of sp..
@TheZenoEffect I wish youtube would give us more characters..! A cyclical universe makes more sense to me,will google it later. Following on from my last comment ,after the energy is used up we are just left with cold matter very far appart. Then what. just a weak gravitational pull between all that matter, with no more energy pushing it appart, they will all then start to drift towards each other, accelerating over time untill enough of it clumps together to reach that critical mass again.
interesting. if there supposedly is no bosons, then what initially gives protons their mass? is it some kind of information awareness in non locality, that observes waves and collapses them into particles that have mass?
q7spiz 3 months ago
@q7spiz Check out 'Biocentrism', it' fairly fucking mind-blowing.
Consciousness, the role of the observer, plays a central, not passive, role
in our observation of the Universe, especially at the sub-atomic/quantum mechanical
level.
Check out the 'quantum Zeno Effect' where as constantly observed particles never
decay, so long as they're being observed. It's "The watched pot never boils" at the
sub-atomic level
TheZenoEffect 3 months ago
"it's not heresy"
it's science
the difference between science and religion is when someone breaks a rule they get the Nobel prize
piratecheese13 4 months ago
Please search for "Speedy neutrino mystery likely solved, relativity safe after all" on dvice. I cite "Researchers at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands went and crunched the numbers on how much relativity should have effected the experiment, and found that the correct compensation should be about 32 additional nanoseconds on each end, which neatly takes care of the 60 nanosecond speed boost that the neutrinos originally seemed to have."
cfloare 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence?
/watch?v=KUroYJ_stAs
Prove it!
joehardysr 4 months ago
i wonder if hitler-y could move that fast out of office someday very soon ! hahahaha ! i know she "hops too" that fast when the cfr snaps fingers at her !
napalmvoododaddy 4 months ago
Rubbish where is the validity in this Einsteins light speed is in a vacuum all Cern tests are through solid matter. Sound travels 10x in water a logical conclusion would be sub atomic particles would travel faster through increased density . Lets find a new Einstein cos you dimwits are nowhere
poohdog67 4 months ago
Were you beat up as a child by football players? Cause really, that last comment was just unnecessary. Especially because one game of football has all the physics that you need to know.
AnthonyHunter70 5 months ago
Confusing dark matter and dark energy some one ? And saying that it doen't exist without explaining the gravitational effect we observed only confirms your total ignorance of a subject you so arrogantly talk about...
You'll explain us how we KNOWW earth is flat in a video soon to come.
Acrimonator 5 months ago
@Acrimonator Dark Matter destroyed by Graviton Waves?
Google: "Gravitational Waves Can Explain Dark Energy And Axis of Evil, Says Cosmologist"
Our entire view of the cosmos is 'warped', bringing Inflation, DM & DE into question.
Also, I don't remember confusing DM & DE.... could you refresh my memory?
Dark Matter has been around as a 'theory' since the 1930's, Dark Energy,
another cosmological goose chase, is a now decades old concept.
What do they have in common? Both are Wrong!
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect Yaaaawn....
Acrimonator 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect Secondly, the results at CERN have not been independently verified. If they are verified, they would not necessarily mean that special relativity is wrong. Neutrinos could be taking a shortcut through space via extra dimensions, and thus may not really be travelling above the speed of light. The Standard Model is not "going down in flames", rather it will need to be modified. The LHC is a success so long as it is collecting data.
ClamCrunchy 5 months ago
@ClamCrunchy Considering that Fermilab near Chicago shot it's last
particle beam yesterday, I suppose there has to be an 'atom smasher'
somewhere on Earth. Gotta Smash Those Goddamn Atoms!
More smashing = More questions - Actual answers: That's my 'theory'.
I agree w/ur neutrino take, that's very possible that those little
bastards are 'leaping' inter-dimensionally.
The bottom line is, if humans were actually honest w/ themselves ,
they'd admit that they (We) really don't know WTF is going on
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect Of course you won't believe what I'm saying. As to your claims about the Higgs Boson not existing, you could be incidentally right. But being incidentally right is very different than being right with strong theoretical reasons. Without solid theoretical reasons behind a claim, you have nothing but a lucky guess. That you have confused dark matter with dark energy suggests that you have no training in physics, as does your rejection of well-founded theories.
ClamCrunchy 5 months ago
There is tremendous evidence that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate due to dark energy. Dark energy is what is causing space to expand. Dark matter was postulated for entirely different reasons than to explain why the universe was expanding. The existence of dark matter was deduced in the 1930's when it was found that the rotational velocities of galaxies remained constant and didn't vary as a function of radial distance.
ClamCrunchy 5 months ago
@ClamCrunchy NOPE! (scientific terminology for 'negative')
The 'Big Bang' is going DOWN, only a matter of time....
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
Warning this guy is full of shit it's not fit, post your credentials or atleast prove you understand the fundamentals, other than reading out of some cheap book.
MikDonsen 5 months ago
@MikDonsen Yes, this guy is a total crackpot. He doesn't understand what he's talking about, and his videos are simply worthless. He doesn't understand the evidence for either Dark Matter or Dark Energy as well as he thinks he does.
ClamCrunchy 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Recent news on BBC regarding FTL:
bbc . co . uk/news/science-environment-15017484
1% faster using a billion dollar experiment, WOW.
How about an experiment showing million times faster propagation of a pulse
using experiment that costs US$10.00 and can be done on your table at home?
BBC would not dare to publish such experiment... you know why...
More news on this to come soon...
butinmyownopinion 5 months ago
Good points made in commentary although doused with some insecure and somewhat passive-aggressive undertones.
Scienterrifical 5 months ago
gore ! hahahaha ! he reminds me of a weak, soft, pink heeled half seal, half whale, and half bottom feeder ! hahahahaha !
napalmvoododaddy 5 months ago
@napalmvoododaddy Yeah, his "24 Hours of Lies" bombed.
Nobody buying it anymore... My question is: How in the hell did people
fall for it in the 1st place?
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect i believe it was far easier in the days when we had no internet. a time when we had to cross check things sitting in a library. gore and others like him seen a chance to make money as well as change laws to support what's now called agw. he had help from the globalists too. the media, and from other world leaders. gore kept it going even when his college professor recanted his study findings about co2. he lies about his meetings with ken lay in the 90's. gore, a major asshole !
napalmvoododaddy 5 months ago
@napalmvoododaddy Excellent point! Who could have predicted that the
very Internet that Al Gore 'invented' would be used to destroy him...?
How 'ironic' is that? :)
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect well, yes, like before, in canada. zbignew brzezinski said that the people of the world are politically awake like never before in world history, and are looking the elite in the eyes. this rings loud and true. gerald celente said before that the information is here. it's here on the web that tells the tail of what the globalists are up to. gore is a small time punk within the goal of global governance. but all this strays from the subject here in your vid. thanks for your time.
napalmvoododaddy 5 months ago
@napalmvoododaddy Even Hitler-y Clinton recently admitted
that they were "Losing the Info War". That cats are out of the bags,
the horses are out of the barn, the train has left the station...
We Know!
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect hahaha ! excellent !! "hitler-y clinton" !!! i'll have to find ways to include this in my conversations with others ! hahaha ! i hope that more people will ask about the connections some of these republican "hopefuls" have with cfr, big pharma, ect. like how in the hell is romney linked with the tea party when he's clearly big government and a poster boy for the cfr. and perry being the same for big pharma and bilderberg, and the nafta highway ect. these blowjobs gotta go !!
napalmvoododaddy 5 months ago
@napalmvoododaddy "hitler-y clinton" !!! Yeah, I came up with that myself,
feel free to use, royalty free! Perry & Romney are about as 'Conservative' as
Mao Tse Tung. Ron Paul is the only GOP candidate on that stage, no wonder
the MSM's stated policy is to ignore him...
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheZenoEffect If you are angry at the media, for ignoring Ron Paul and the American people let them know
FOX News room – 212-301-3344
FOX news radio 212-301-5800
CNN news desk 404-827-2751
CNN news desk fax: 404-827-3368
MSNBC – 212-664-3720
ABC News – 212-456-7777
CBS News – 212-975-4321
CBS News fax – 212-975-1893
i heard that too. i found a place that just happened to have these numbers in a persons comment. i hope others will call in favor of paul.
napalmvoododaddy 5 months ago
OPERA doesn't belong to LHC. Please watch out. It belongs to CERN. LHC is a different project.
cybertib 5 months ago
@cybertib I'm well aware of that. I was bringing up the LHC, which is located
at CERN to point out their recent failure to detect B-mesons, a way of detecting
Supersymmetry, & the fact that Higgs has been excluded to 95%, within the expected
range.
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect So, if I well understand, you propose that CERN is hidding the failure to discover Higg's boson by making some noise with an old theory. However, I'm not sure that suggesting that quantum decorrelation has a link with particle velocity theoretical limit. In one hand, we deal with one information, then we deal with phase velocity. In the other hand, we deal with matter, a packet of particles which then has a group behavior. I think OPERA really discovered something.
cybertib 5 months ago
CERN a "failure?" If CERN results overturn the Standard Model that could hardly be considered a failure; it would be monumental. It's like saying the Hubble telescope would be a failure if it looked to the edge of the universe and instead of seeing what was expected we saw, say, a brick wall. that's not a failure, it's new and exciting information! Having said that, I'll bet a dollar to a donut CERN just got their clocks set wrong.
adrienlorrain1 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect No one is trying to 'rule' anything,
only pointing out that the current scientific orthodoxy is, BY THEIR OWN ADMISSION, pushing 'Smoke'
If you inhale 'smoke'... that's YOUR problem..
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect I think you are being a little prematurely cynical here - if you bothered to watch their webcast it is clear that a massive effort was made to falsify their results over a significant period. I may not be as informed as you but I don't think this has anything to do with the anomalies of quantum physics - space time can expand faster than the speed of light as we have observed with velocities of distant galaxies but that does not violate Einstein? If anything ... continued
vohshkab 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect - PART 2 - If it is not a measurement problem (most likely using GPS etc one would thing gives a higher margin of error than +/- 10 nanoseconds) then it has been feasably mooted that it is a consequence of neutrino's taking a short cut through a different dimension ... I have also heard that dark matter may be mass or gravity reaching us from a different dimension also thought to comprise WIMPS ... this may be an interesting line of enquiry given the lack of data on dark matter?
vohshkab 5 months ago
@vohshkab I really don't think that Dark Matter is even necessary. DM is a
attempt to explain 'why' the Universe is expanding. But if it's not expanding,
DM is pointless. If there's some observation that shows that it is, I'd like
to see it. As far as this story goes, it does still have to be verified. This
was a 3yr experiment & the data must be immense.
Also, there's always the possibility of miss-calibration.
We'll have to wait and see...
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect Thanks for your response but not to belabor a point ... I think you are mixing up the repulsive Dark Energy force with Dark Matter, which has been posited as the extra invisible mass holding the galaxies together. Dark Energy is indeed an explanation for an expanding universe. The point that I was making is that I read (Michio Kaku) that Dark Matter may be gravity reaching us from another dimension, which struck me as coincidental given the extra dimension explanation for CERN.
vohshkab 5 months ago
@vohshkab I understand the difference between Dark Matter & Dark Energy.
Just pointing out that neither are necessary & both are based on the
assumption that inflation is occurring, which it's not. DM is supposedly
more of a 'halo' surrounding galaxies, where DE as you stated is a
repulsive force. My beef is that there's no observational evidence
whatsoever for expansion, only misinterpretation of redshift.
I'm no fan of Kaku as his 'super strings' & Higgs Bosons are
turning out to be illusions.
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect fair enough - good video albeit a little strident for my taste given the subject matter. Good video ...
vohshkab 5 months ago
I have to be smart enough to predict that such videos will appear. Junk "scienttsts" rule youtube.
rycka1983 5 months ago
So smart after the fact? BTW, instanteneous is not the same as particles MOVING faster than speed of light. Instantaneous is not same as MOVING throught space.
I think this video is some kind of vendeta. You are enemy, not ally of science.
rycka1983 5 months ago
darkness is faster than light not light and darkness is already there
adiel34 5 months ago
@adiel34 Nice insight. Stars & galaxies are just tiny reminders
that there is still light, when darkness pervades everything.
Even moonlight is just a 'reflection' of sunlight o the Earth.
No light, no moon..
This goes back to an interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
If none were here to observe the Moon, would it even exist?
- Darkness is the absence of perception.
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
You sound so certain of yourself.
Should you not be contributing your knowledge to the CERN project?
jazzx251 5 months ago
I wouldn't want to be a physicist right now! I think they already did the testings multiple times to minimize the margin of error. Physics is so complicated but it just got more complicated now... However, the fact that it was neutrinos that traveled faster than light makes me feel skeptical about it. Specially because we know so little about them and they're pretty evasive too.
TRYCLOPS1 5 months ago
I loved your comment about watching football. I was a sports fan until several years ago I started playing rated tournament chess.
Now I am almost obsessed with science.
And this new ? discovery is something I/we are all alive to witness. Amazing!
AlbertHofmannJr 5 months ago
@AlbertHofmannJr LOL welcome to the club. Science is addicting!
TRYCLOPS1 5 months ago
its an amazing breakthrough but this narrator is an idiot
danidoj 5 months ago
Plancktime ... Plancklength ... everything changes ... oh me oh my!
johnsteerling 5 months ago
Yes it is true that instantaneous speed you are describing is proven to be true...it is overall useless since you cannot transfer any information faster than the speed of light. So it's not like physicists shrugged Aspect's findings under the rug, just that sending information with the speed of light is far more efficient than using the instantaneous speed.
richardoyu 5 months ago
I don't think it's called the Nobel PEACE prize of science...
winstono75 5 months ago
@winstono75 Yeah, I got that... after I posted it.
I was tired -_- when I made this vid early this morning.
Whatever you want to call it Aspect sure as hell deserves it
more than that fat piece of shit Al Gore
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect The discovery of ultimate interconnectedness might indeed warrant a peace prize.
winstono75 5 months ago
I was liking your video... until you took a hit at football... haha.
MinorCheese777 5 months ago
I have no idea if the guy is right or no but he's sure as hell very confident during the delivery of his speech :) Interesting stuff though.
ContainmentFailure 5 months ago
so how is instantanious a speed? its not like infinite mps or at least more than 186,282 mps is it? because if its not, it actually is surpsising if something is actually moving at more than 186,282 mps, asuming e=mc² is right.. im not some kind of educated physics guy, im just wondering, because to me it sounds like thats something more or less completely different, and it sounds as well like you dont like CERN, because as they didnt proof higgs boson to exist yet, whos to say it doesn't ?
NeonBirdy 5 months ago
@NeonBirdy Instantaneous is NOT a 'speed', but it's faster than the 'Speed of Light',
because no distance is traveled.
-The shortest distance between to points in space is a straight line. - No!
-The shortest distance' is "nowhere" - That's how non-locality works!
Yes, I have a 'grudge' against Higgs because I don't like 'junk science'
whether it's popular or not. Higgs is based on the 'Standard Model' being
correct, which it's not - & the speed of light is a prime example of
how flawed it is
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect ok, first off, nice explanation of instantaneous, but as you said, no distance is traveled, which, of course would in theory be faster than light, but the point of what they seem to have accomplished is that something actually moves a distance at more than the speed of light, which would be what i meant with "two completely different things" and i think thats something that hasent been done before, right?
NeonBirdy 5 months ago
@NeonBirdy I see your point, & you see mine. But light has traveled
300 times the 'Speed of Light' with the use of laser beams. What's
different here is that light travels at the same speed in a vacuum,
not through a medium. So the answer is 'Yes' & 'No'
'Yes' it has been done before, but 'No' not without of a medium
of travel.
So, this experiment data IS is groundbreaking, but not surprising...
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect huh, i see, interessting, didnt know that.. thx for the talk, really enjoyed it
NeonBirdy 5 months ago
All of you ignorant people, who know nothing about physics and think that you understand most complex theories which take many years at university to learn and understand, are jealous of those who understand it. So you are trying to make all sorts of argument to prove that scientists are wrong, because they don't have evidence for existence of higgs and some other theories yet. You people should shut up and let the scientists explore, because they are responisble for todays technology you use
Andranik45 5 months ago
@WW2medalsNpatchesME BINGO! It's about the domino collapse of
popularized 'Junk Science', ESPECIALLY Global Warming!
At least Quantum Mechanics actually has practical application
in our everyday lives. Global Warming is the opposite- 'control' our
entire lives to serve a 'theory'
'Credibility' is a commodity, and the scientific community
is bankrupt. You actually have these self-righteous idiots claiming
they know how the entire Universe began when they can't even predict
weather accurately!
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
Uhm, good fight A-Level physics to be honest...
TheGodZephuros 5 months ago
Why are SOME people saying that this would mean God or a God exists? How do they mean? Just curious. I think they're just trolling though.
johndoe7033 5 months ago
Have you written any good papers on the subject of the illusive higgs?
hellwitchify 5 months ago
@hellwitchify No, of course not. But you don't have to be a 'Scientist' to
know that the Big Bang, String Theory, Higgs Boson, & the Standard Model
are bunk! Do you want ME to travel to CERN to verify their findings? No!
The burden of proof is on them, not me, & thus far they
haven't been able to provide any...
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
Dark Matter is an assumption of this unknown yet matter that have mass but you can't detect it , the God Particle is this Unknown yet particle that gives matter it's mass ,also an assumption , and none of them haven't been discover and you assume there's nothing like that at all cause you're a fucken genius or something ?
just STFU bro you are just another looser that some physics professor somewhere fucked your grad. degree
almadaa11 5 months ago
@almadaa11 How come you clowns can never spell "loser" properly.
I'm no scientist, but at least I know how to use 'spell check'...
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
Like the commentary.! .I just cant wait to hear the new (some resurrected) theories. I suspect that CERN is just trying to find out the truth . Theory is just theory..after all.
Esurname 5 months ago
@Esurname Thanks, I tried not to cuss, which is very easy to do for me.
This IS big news, but more in context the the massive upheaval currently going on
in the scientific community. 100 yrs of presumption & ill-conceived concepts
are crumbling into dust, & We Are Alive to witness it! :)
The 'Big Bang' is the 'Big One' to fall, only a matter of time...
If this LHC discovery is verified, lets hope it helps to push the
'Big Bang' into the dustbins of scientific dogma right next to
Geocentrism
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect The 'Big Bang' theory will fall, but it will take the discovery of matter older than the universe itself..Personaly I think the 'big bang' has happened before . We can all agree that the universe is expanding from a common source, but I dont think it was a single point. More like a critical mass of matter being squeezed
by gravity. I think the universe then expands ,accelerating at first ,untill the propelling energy runs out,or gets absorbed by receptive matter. ran out of sp..
Esurname 5 months ago
@Esurname Sir Roger Penrose has recently backed off the
Big bang model in favor of 'Pulsating' or Cyclical Universe insisting
that the "low entropy, highly ordered state existed at the birth of our universe
unless things were set in order before the Big Bang occurred. doesn't
match the Standard Model"
Google: Was the Big Bang Preceded by Another Universe?
Great article.
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect How interesting, please tell me more...
thaandiesel 5 months ago
@TheZenoEffect I wish youtube would give us more characters..! A cyclical universe makes more sense to me,will google it later. Following on from my last comment ,after the energy is used up we are just left with cold matter very far appart. Then what. just a weak gravitational pull between all that matter, with no more energy pushing it appart, they will all then start to drift towards each other, accelerating over time untill enough of it clumps together to reach that critical mass again.
Esurname 5 months ago
dang i clicked on the wrong link, i thought this ws the SAINTS game highlights
HybridStoner 5 months ago
@HybridStoner My Bad... I guess I need to get my priorities in order...
TheZenoEffect 5 months ago