Galloway is wrong, if Pakistan had no nukes, u s would have invaded them by now, but they know pak will nuke them if over pressured, so nukes as a deterrent is definitely right and a good shield.
This caller is such an idiot. All he seems to care about is the fact that Iran has 'nuclear capability'. He is a complete idiot and a typical red top reading xenophobe.
Slightly different line from what CND et al. argued in the 1970s and 1980s. Remember? Pressure the NATO nuclear powers to disarm, and at the same time, completely ignore the Soviet Union's stockpiles.
I think the caller has a point although isn't able to present it well. Clearly there hasn't been world peace since the invention of nuclear weapons but there hasn't been any mass invastions like there has been throughout history. I think its less likely that another Hitler will try to conquer the world. Without guns its far easier for gangs to pillage villages like they did in medievil times.
LOL, the caller got totally owned at the end when george said to him, "by your Logic, Iran should have nuclear weapons, so they can have peace with Israel"..LOL, then the caller started to waffle a load of poo.....LOL......Good video bro,5 stars, jazak Allah khir.
that was really ironic at the end, that bloke totally thought hed outsmarted him somehow whereas ol'galloway was pointing out a glaring inconsistency in the guy's argument
This has been flagged as spam show
what a dumbass
gg all da way!
KOZOG1 3 months ago
The caller is an idiot, how stupid must you be to think that the only purpose nuclear fission serves is too build nuclear wepons.
zubatzu 6 months ago
Galloway is wrong, if Pakistan had no nukes, u s would have invaded them by now, but they know pak will nuke them if over pressured, so nukes as a deterrent is definitely right and a good shield.
bagshitass 7 months ago
This caller is such an idiot. All he seems to care about is the fact that Iran has 'nuclear capability'. He is a complete idiot and a typical red top reading xenophobe.
AEF091 1 year ago
"If everyone got rid of nuclear weapons..."
Slightly different line from what CND et al. argued in the 1970s and 1980s. Remember? Pressure the NATO nuclear powers to disarm, and at the same time, completely ignore the Soviet Union's stockpiles.
DeepSixed300 1 year ago
thick people like dat guy should b lined up and shot.......thick motherfucker
lemtaraja 1 year ago
Galloway wins again.
This caller was a complete idiot.
7jem331 1 year ago
I think the caller has a point although isn't able to present it well. Clearly there hasn't been world peace since the invention of nuclear weapons but there hasn't been any mass invastions like there has been throughout history. I think its less likely that another Hitler will try to conquer the world. Without guns its far easier for gangs to pillage villages like they did in medievil times.
brianshan1 1 year ago
This is an extremely bizarre argument
irishtrotskyist 2 years ago
Big George doesn't tolerate any fucking nonsense from arseholes like this caller, well done George, yer still the man!
AlannahBabalon156 2 years ago
0:28 "No i'm SO not Hugh, being silly!" ahaha.....the added "SO" was excellent!.
DrTeinaz 2 years ago
The guy misunderstands GG completely and starts giggling like an idiot. What a moron.
S30iavash 2 years ago
LOL, the caller got totally owned at the end when george said to him, "by your Logic, Iran should have nuclear weapons, so they can have peace with Israel"..LOL, then the caller started to waffle a load of poo.....LOL......Good video bro,5 stars, jazak Allah khir.
muslim610 2 years ago
get em' georgy.
donkey69donkey69 2 years ago 2
A+++++++++++++++++
ms5er 2 years ago 2
another cocksucking caller
navijatt 2 years ago 3
"Then you'll cut me off" Cheeky git.
Politicratos 2 years ago
I think the caller had one beer too many
Ayrshirenutter 2 years ago 5
Wow. I am very proud of Galloway. Nice clip. Thank you.
ItzMeRon 2 years ago 8
that was really ironic at the end, that bloke totally thought hed outsmarted him somehow whereas ol'galloway was pointing out a glaring inconsistency in the guy's argument
nameshaveallbeenused 2 years ago 8