ahha, We've got a mate at T.N.D thats got a Porsche 994 Non-turbo but with a super charger pumping 460hp to the wheels, no Internal Porting, or crank sharft work, all stock appart from Exhaught , for Porsche Cup.
Btw.... Turbo 944 would have smoked that Rice Burner, let alone 944 with a 968 3.0L non turbo engine in it. :D Porsche is probs one of the oldest faster cars on earth :) with a great History of winnings.
LOL you raced a 300 TT vs. an N/A 944? Bravo sir. But if it would have been a 951 you would have been seeing tail lights. Too many dumb videos like this on Youtube.
"HEY CHECK ME OUT, I TOTALLY DESTROYED THAT CAR WITH 150 LESS HORSEPOWER"
i beat a mustang cobra s/c 2003 and some other muscle car so .. im not proud of this race .. with a N/A porsche with only 160hp ...now r u happy !? ;) :P
Umm your way off on that. The sticker price on mine new was 38k with all the options. When I say "poor man's porsche", I am referring to the fact that porsche is not known for selling 26k cars. The Average porsche is over 80k new. Most people can not afford a car that price
either way, porsche 911's still went for over 80k even back then. Roughly 3 or more times the cost of the 944. Again, I am simply explaining that the 944 can in no way be compared to a 911 in quality and construction. The 944 is geared toward your average joe enthusiast with a beer pocketbook
A 1988 Porsche 911 Turbo sold for $50,000 brand new, the 1988 Porsche 944 Turbo sold for $48,000 and the 928 S4 sold for $75,000.
Your wrong about the 944 never comparing to the 911. The 944 turbo has a higher top speed than a 911 turbo, handles better and has similar acceleration. The 944 NA was a entry level sports car, the 944 Turbo, 911 Turbo and 928 S4 were the 3 flagships of Porsche at the time. The 944 Turbo was developed to replace the 911.
Porsche 911 isn't best in Porsche, 911 handles crap , Under steers, Pushes, loses rear Trackion, I know this because my old man has 7 of them, the best porsche that was ever created was probs the 968 , only 12,000 of them Made, why ? because they we're better, porsche didnt want the 911 look shit beside the 968 on the track. But by saying that its all up to the driver, but I completely Agree on what your saying about 944,
@OwGod2 Yeah, the 968 ts/rs is one of the greatest Porsche ever IMO. The only other Porsche Id rather have is a 959, or 556 spyder, or CGT. Ok maybe a GT1. For a car Id want to drive daily...968 ts hands down. No contest. I like a sleeper on the streets.
@JoeShmoeBlow The 951 may have been assembled at Neckarsulm, but the 968 was assembled at Zuffenhausen. Its not about the the quality, and construction(which was way ahead of the curve then anyway), Its about balance, and platform layout. 951 is a more raw sports car, I dont really see or feel the build difference in its contemporary 911's. 928 was for the luxury, GT car. It resembles the 951/68 much more so.
@JoeShmoeBlow Saying its geared toward a beer pocketbook, isnt really very accurate. Those guys were more inclined to buy 5.0 stang back then, or camaro. 951 was still not a cheap car then. Maybe geared more toward the VW crowd, but not avg joe.
ahha, We've got a mate at T.N.D thats got a Porsche 994 Non-turbo but with a super charger pumping 460hp to the wheels, no Internal Porting, or crank sharft work, all stock appart from Exhaught , for Porsche Cup.
Btw.... Turbo 944 would have smoked that Rice Burner, let alone 944 with a 968 3.0L non turbo engine in it. :D Porsche is probs one of the oldest faster cars on earth :) with a great History of winnings.
OwGod2 10 months ago
145 Ps gegen 286 Ps ???? thats a joke its a small old Porsche .
TheMarlboroman73 1 year ago
Ill race you next in my 951 :)
Piperporsche180944 2 years ago
LOL. 300hp vs 145hp.........
<<<<951 owner... NOT stock....bring that Ztt up this way and stop picking on 150hp cars.....LOL
toddk911 2 years ago
LOL you raced a 300 TT vs. an N/A 944? Bravo sir. But if it would have been a 951 you would have been seeing tail lights. Too many dumb videos like this on Youtube.
"HEY CHECK ME OUT, I TOTALLY DESTROYED THAT CAR WITH 150 LESS HORSEPOWER"
dumb
mayamanign 2 years ago
i beat a mustang cobra s/c 2003 and some other muscle car so .. im not proud of this race .. with a N/A porsche with only 160hp ...now r u happy !? ;) :P
j3tta3 2 years ago
Good job, you beat a n/a 944 in a drag race, with its whole ~160hp. 944's are built to haul ass around curvy roads, not go drag racing.
luek944 2 years ago 2
thats not a turbo 944 so this is dumb
the turbo would be a good ass race i no cause i got one
MurKinSeason423 2 years ago 2
thats a poor man's porsche
JoeShmoeBlow 3 years ago
300zx is not a poor mans porsche it was quite expensive then around 44,000
kushpushk 2 years ago
the porsche 944 is a poor man's porsche, not the z
JoeShmoeBlow 2 years ago
im not talking about the 300zx, im talking about the 944 porsche
JoeShmoeBlow 2 years ago
yet it is still underestimated... not to mention what you can do to them...
darkeyce02 2 years ago
What do you drive?
Piperporsche180944 2 years ago
G35 infiniti 2005
JoeShmoeBlow 2 years ago
My old Porsche 944 NA was bought for $26,900 in 1985, thats nearly what your car costs here in 2005! Poor mans Porsche? I think not.
Piperporsche180944 2 years ago
Umm your way off on that. The sticker price on mine new was 38k with all the options. When I say "poor man's porsche", I am referring to the fact that porsche is not known for selling 26k cars. The Average porsche is over 80k new. Most people can not afford a car that price
JoeShmoeBlow 2 years ago
Forgive me, I was looking at 2005 Infiniti G35 used car prices and added $10,000 to that amount.
The average family income per year in 1985 was $31,000, $27,000 spent on that car would be 87% of the household income.
$55,000/year is the current individual average income, $38,000 is also a hefty price, 69% of the individuals income.
Piperporsche180944 2 years ago
either way, porsche 911's still went for over 80k even back then. Roughly 3 or more times the cost of the 944. Again, I am simply explaining that the 944 can in no way be compared to a 911 in quality and construction. The 944 is geared toward your average joe enthusiast with a beer pocketbook
JoeShmoeBlow 2 years ago
A 1988 Porsche 911 Turbo sold for $50,000 brand new, the 1988 Porsche 944 Turbo sold for $48,000 and the 928 S4 sold for $75,000.
Your wrong about the 944 never comparing to the 911. The 944 turbo has a higher top speed than a 911 turbo, handles better and has similar acceleration. The 944 NA was a entry level sports car, the 944 Turbo, 911 Turbo and 928 S4 were the 3 flagships of Porsche at the time. The 944 Turbo was developed to replace the 911.
Piperporsche180944 2 years ago
@Piperporsche180944
Porsche 911 isn't best in Porsche, 911 handles crap , Under steers, Pushes, loses rear Trackion, I know this because my old man has 7 of them, the best porsche that was ever created was probs the 968 , only 12,000 of them Made, why ? because they we're better, porsche didnt want the 911 look shit beside the 968 on the track. But by saying that its all up to the driver, but I completely Agree on what your saying about 944,
Where about to race 944 :)
OwGod2 10 months ago
@OwGod2 Yeah, the 968 ts/rs is one of the greatest Porsche ever IMO. The only other Porsche Id rather have is a 959, or 556 spyder, or CGT. Ok maybe a GT1. For a car Id want to drive daily...968 ts hands down. No contest. I like a sleeper on the streets.
threezerol944t 6 months ago
@JoeShmoeBlow The 951 may have been assembled at Neckarsulm, but the 968 was assembled at Zuffenhausen. Its not about the the quality, and construction(which was way ahead of the curve then anyway), Its about balance, and platform layout. 951 is a more raw sports car, I dont really see or feel the build difference in its contemporary 911's. 928 was for the luxury, GT car. It resembles the 951/68 much more so.
threezerol944t 6 months ago
@JoeShmoeBlow Saying its geared toward a beer pocketbook, isnt really very accurate. Those guys were more inclined to buy 5.0 stang back then, or camaro. 951 was still not a cheap car then. Maybe geared more toward the VW crowd, but not avg joe.
threezerol944t 6 months ago
how do u launch? any mods?
xmagic99 3 years ago
porsche scam shit use japan engine
asusddr 3 years ago
no turbo its true ..
j3tta3 3 years ago
The Porsche 944 wasn't even turbo. It would have been a bit closer if it was. You can tell by the outjut on the 944's front bumper.
AmrenAcree 3 years ago