Added: 4 years ago
From: larsstolwijk
Views: 19,559
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (118)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Don't get Ubunu! you will regret it even if the specs are above minimum! My pentium 3 ran xp just fine until I installed Ubuntu, now it won't stop freezing :(

  • @MrTpengineer I don't like Ubuntu too, it usually works as slow as a snail. Ubuntu is a piece of cr*p IMO.

  • @ferencproject lol yup.

  • a samsung wave is faster!!!

  • I have the computer that boards out of! lol check out my p3 system @ jmdawson(dot)co(dot)uk

  • @GeforcerFX I think if you benchmarked them with cpu only benchmarks you would find a different story.

    Even the Core 2 line is only about 1GHz faster clock for clock, I.E. a 2GHz Core 2 about equals a 3GHz Pentium 4 on single core applications. Seeing how the Core architecture is faster than the P6 architecture of the Pentium 3 clock for clock I don't see how a 1.4GHz tutlian is faster than a 2GHz faster p4.

    Those tutlian p3's were great and were so fast the early Pentium 4's weren't needed!

  • @GeforcerFX Yes and that's great, too bad 2GHz P4's are considered slow. Try that Tualatin vs a 3.6GHz P4.

    The whole point of the P4 was very high clock speed to achieve performance.

    Also Conroe and Wolfdale processors whoop the Pentium 3, I know it's irrelevant but so was your post =)

  • my p 3 project is

    1.10 GHz

    512 mb ram

    64 mb videocard

    wi-fi

    im use it as a server pc

  • YAY!I made this comment with my old pentium iii running at 1ghz. I can still do some websurfing with this old machine.

    Specs:

    1ghz pentium iii

    512 mb ram(2 pc133 256 rams)

    on board 32 mb intel video ram

    40 gb seagate barracuda

  • Damn I love reading discussions about Athlon-era stuff. These new CPUs are all the same. Me, I went with a Tualatin til 2005.

  • Comment removed

  • @GeforcerFX The Willamette was rushed out because the Athlon was such a good chip. If people were 'wanting something new' they wouldn't have held on to their P3's like you already said.

    Intel have behaved in a disgusting manner time and time again, and thanks to the weak minded consumer, they will continue to get away with their monopolistic business practice for generations to come.

    So rest assured, you will have plenty more rushed out and poorly made Intel crap to go with your other garbage.

  • @GeforcerFX No we do not use BTX cases do we? Hmm *checks pc case* nope, no BTX here, maybe you should look at the spec sheet for your motherboard? Basically a chip which gobbled up so much power was totally unnecessary back then, and cpu's would have progressed on to bigger and larger coolers over time to what we have today without the red hot P4s. In fact my 'precious' Athlon was one of the first significant steps towards providing adequate cooling due to the lack of thermal protection.

  • Comment removed

  • @GeforcerFX The P4 wasn't better better then the P3, why do you think Intel had to revert back to P3 technology in conroe? when Prescott got brought out, it was slower clock for clock compared to Northwood. You clearly haven't looked at benchmarks, you don't know about characteristics concerning different core architecture, you think having a red hot inefficient and over priced cpu is a good thing, so I coclude your either a troll or an Intel fan boy.

  • @GeforcerFX Intel had to bring out a new socket to support the Northwood core, making all of those motherboards built around socket 423 complete garbage. A Duron could put pace the early P4's, thats how rubbish they were, so I don't understand how you conclude a P4 could perform with an Athlon. The jump to 2ghz was nothing special as the CPU would do less work per clock cycle, it was made to clock fast to look good on paper. If they 'learned from there mistake' it couldn't have been that good!

  • @GeforcerFX A little bigger heat sink? it was extremely inefficient due to the inherent problems of the architecture, hence why Intel wanted to bring out the BTX form factor to try and combat the thermal issues suffered from the P4. The reason why BTX didn't take off was because Intel stopped pursuing the P4. Netburst didn't work when it was brought out, the Willamette core was rushed out to try and combat the success of the Athlon..

  • @GeforcerFX The P4 especially ran far too hot compared to the Athlon 64, Hyper-threading was a sham as it ran single threaded applications slower on a lot of your highly loved benchmarks, Netburst is a joke hence why they haven't carried over to any new generations of processors. The way Intel have behaved as a company with regards to business ethics is a complete insult to the consumer. So yeah, I'd say based on the contributions of the two companies, the Athlon was far superior.

  • @GeforcerFX yeah your right, I am shouting words to deaf ears because you clearly seem unable to listen properly. Synthetic benchmarks are not the definitive proof as to whats better, and even if they were I'd still side with AMD. Every time AMD brought out a new line of cpus, I knew full well that I'd buy a product that would offer significant improvement over its predecessor. Intel couldn't offer that, and built its products around marketing gimics. Their platforms have a lower life span...

  • @GeforcerFX I never said anything about it being better cause of 5 points lol that's what I'm trying to get through here. I was talking about the Athlon being better from a wider perspective, rather then just focusing purely on benchmarks.

  • @GeforcerFX It's good to see you've completely missed the point of what I said. I haven't even mentioned gaming performance and your harping on about fps and video cards, and giving it the big one about how your obviously the expert based on all of the shite that you've owned in the past - implying that my experience counts for less?

    Go back to your bedroom and fold your socks.

  • @GeforcerFX It basically took the size of Intel, along with their lack of business ethics to remain competitive against a tiny company like AMD. If company sizes were reversed, Intel would have gone bust before bringing out the Pentium D. So yeah, factor in the whole story of everything that was going on at the time, and the P3 and P4 sucked compared to the Athlon.

  • @GeforcerFX not that it made any difference considering they both sucked compared to the Athlon

  • I have an 80gb drive in my p3

  • wats the name of this song?

  • I remember this song from a shipping company commercial, i think UPS.

  • whats the song?

  • i got a pentium 3 ighz 480 mb ram 30 gb hdd and a screen for FREE and it rns xp realy good

  • @CrazyHighVoltage i have a pentinum 3 with only 1GHz, i can overclock right? i am going to buy a gaming-pc soon but i have this for internet only..

  • i dont know how to overclock a pc.

    if i did i would help you to do it.

  • Hey I have a spare 40 gb hdd layin around...if you want it ill give it to you for 10$....ps(i like p3s(:)

  • wow that machine would run windows vista lite well (windows vista lite is a cracked copy of vista that will run on a pentium 2

  • we only have 6 cores atm, 8 cores are coming tho!

  • lol no u dint go further down as i was going out with mates xD

    but now i know thanks for the info the other just replyed to me too! xD

  • i7 has 8 cores!! :O

    wow learn summin new every day! :D

    thats alot of cores... -_-

  • No! It's 4 cores but can run 8 threads.

  • Oooh! i get ya! ^_^

    Thanks for the info.

  • what does those Threads mean? :o

  • like fake core ...

  • lol which i7 got 4,2 ghz? xD

    and its still 4 cores, but because of hyperthreading, the cpu can do 2 things on 1 core, that's why the pc sees 8 cores

    noob

  • go lick your dads pussy you wanker....lol

    blocking time!!!!!!!!

  • hahaha are you aware that im only 13?

    leave me fucking alone!!!!

  • beat 4ghz dual core and i mght be getting a new prosessor a quad core =D LOL

  • My hardmodded 1.47 P3 project is almost done..Just installed Windows 98se with 512mb of the fastest ram i could find for the board.Iam using an ATI Rage Fury Maxx Dual GPU video card(DX7) so i can play Quake 2 and MCFS.Ill have a vid soon..Its a classic old school machine with all the good stuff from the period

  • If you have a 128MB graphics card, you can play Elder Scrolls Oblivion.

  • i am not sure what type of pentium 4 my computer is but it has 3.2GHZ and was made in 2004 if that helps

  • probly Hyper-Threaded

  • p3 can play COD4?

  • It's the video card that counts, not the processor.

  • They both play an important role...

  • True.

  • By the way...I like it too, get out what old hardware can run...I tested a year ago an old Notebook with an non MMX 1st-gen Pentium, 150MHz 48MB EDO-RAM 2GB HDD how Win2000 runs...what it brakes down is the low RAM but it works fine till the RAM runs out. :) Its like an Williamate 1st-gen Pentium4 Celeron 1,7GHz with Vista...you can use that CPU with a good GPU and fast HDD as game PC but don´t use MediaPlayer...it will be the only running prog when used and this with low speed vids, music run.

  • Yeah, totally agree, i got a Willamette P4 1,5ghz it's not bad, overclockable to 1,725mhz or something, but it lacks cache and media support build-in....

  • Hy, i have the same question as bluedawn249 9 months bevor...can you tell me wath the song is called?

  • The Postal Service - Such Great heights

  • A big THX! :)

  • pentium 3s are still good.

  • they have thair adavntages but compared to newer processors there slates of platic :/

  • I use them in my servers.

  • I remember when i used to wait for my Pentium 3 to load normal software programs like internet and windows media player. However when we got a pentium 4 the pentium 3 seems soooo much slower!

  • Iam building a abit vh- series mobo with a hardmodded 1.47 tulatin cpu/1.5 GB of ram for a windows2000/Ubuntu dual boot box

  • Nice,

    good choise for win2000, same power as winXP, but loads faster

  • 2000 was my favorite os..it ran so good and was way ahead of its time..I make a vid soon and post it..i have to make a few one for my game rig and one for teh backup/linux box..Nice build man..

  • I prefered 2000 over ME

  • whats the difference?

  • ME has more stuff and is VERY Unstable and is Built off of the windows 9x and DOS kernel.

    Windows 2000 dont have that much stuff but its VERY stable and is built of the NT Kernel (Like XP and Vista/7)

  • I HATE Windows ME, it froze like every 5 min.

  • lol

  • @kiotieiii Try Xubuntu instead of Windows ME in older PCs.

  • I just got an pci sata raid card and a few 60gb seagate sata1 laptop hd's for teh raid-0

  • thanks for this! it was cool! i did it with a slot 1 pentium 3, and a k6-2!

  • howd did u oc ur p3 1ghz to 1.4ghz? i cant even oc mine to 1.1 Ghz without it stuffing up.

  • must be either the board or PSU. I managed to OC 2 Pentium III 933MHz CPUs to almost 1.2GHz on an Abit VP6 (dual socket 370)

  • how? what did you use?

  • an Abit VP6 dual socket 370 SMP motherboard, it's a sweet board. Luckily, mine was refurbished, so the bad capacitors were replaced on it.

  • wow, i think that use like, slot 1 or something, haha the day befor zf-sockets. btw, p3 chip core is so tiny, wtf!

  • No not really. Today mobile pc CPU cores a very small. Today they just have a big cover. you can see it very tiny if you remove the cover

  • um, even still im sure only intels atom ore via's nano are THAT small.

  • now do an athlon xp.

  • how to overclock thanks

  • branded pc's aren't overclockable, like Compaq, Dell, etc. only non0branded pc's are overclockable

  • @larsstolwijk : Not entirely true... I pin-modded my Compaq Evo with a Pentium 4. 1.8ghz to 2.4ghz. Has been running stable for about a year now.

  • @larsstolwijk thats not true i overclocked my HP laptop from 2Ghz to 3Ghz

  • the Postal Service - Such Great Hights

    ;)

  • TESTIMONY...

    Still i can play Need For Speed Underground 2, NFS Carbon, NFS Pro Street, Command & Conquer Generals Zero Hour, C&C 3 Tiberium, Warcraft3 World of Warcraft, NBA Live07, Max Payne2, GTA San Andreas and more 3D games in full detail w/o stoping, hanging or restarting... Also i can play DVD, HDVD videos smoothly in full screen... BELIEVE IT OR NOT!!! Intel PentiumIII user from Philippines...!!!

  • Yes, Pentium III is a great processor. Some of them even beat the early Pentium 4 processors.

  • CONTINUED...

    22" Viewsonic VX2255WMB 5ms built-in cam LCD Monitor,

    Asus 52x32x52x16x COMBO DVD/CDRW,

    Asus DRW-1814BL 18X Dual Layer Ligthscribe DVDRW,

    Duke DUO8A 550W PSU,

    Leadtek WNFST TV USBII Deluxe,

    4Port USB2.0 Hub

    USB Optical Mouse and Keyboard

    Microsoft Windows XP Professional Media Center Edition 2005

  • Talking about Intel Pentium 3 System?

    I'm using right now a iP3 1.2GHz, 1GHz PC133 SDRAM 2pcs. Kingston SDR133 memory,

    ASUS CUV4X-VM Motherboard

    PowerColor HD 3850 PCS 512MB AGP 8x ATI RADEON HD3850 but only runs at 4x,

    Seagate Barracuda 80GB EIDE 7200rpm HDD (Master boot drive),

    Wester Digital 160GB IDE 7200rpm HDD (Slave Storage drive)

    Creative Sound Blaster LIVE! Platinum PCI 24Bit with LIVE! Drive II,

    Linksys EG1064 10/100/1000Mbps PCI Ethernet,

  • Im running a P3 800MhzEB; 512MB PC133 ram; HighPoint HPT3xx Ata Raid Controller; Asus CUV4X MOBO; GeForce2 MX; Creative Awesome 64 (ISA) an unknown brand BT tv card (for zoneminder); a Sony DVDRW; one 80GB maxtor HDD and two 120GB Ibm HDDs. All these inside of a Xubuntu 7.10 box. even with Compiz :-)

  • people are so caught up in dual core and shit they dont relize that a cool running p3 will get the job done. but hell i would take a newer proccess anyday.

  • i made my own p3 system a p3 1ghz 512mb 133mhz 80gb 133 umda hdd soundblaster live5.1 xfx 7600gt 580m i can run fear combat on it but not smoothly my cpu heatsink is replaced with a better one then the standard and there an 120mm fan above it cant read the cpu temps motherboard dusnt let me:( also from a compaq deskpro

  • i only get a warning from bios that the cpu hasnt got an compaq code in it but thats all

  • We also putted Windows XP Professional on it.

    Works perfectly now. But we have no antivirus, just because; when you won't go to those familiar sites where you'll be cought up by a virus, then why would you need a antivirus;).

    Maybe it would be good if you're gonna tweak Win XP, like close some start-up program's etc.

    If you want some info abaut it, PM me!

    Good Luck!

  • put firefox on it

  • I'm realy looking forward to the next update

  • and what an amzing powerpoint presentation

  • I really want to buy that PC,

    I think that's it realy fast :P

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more