So many lives lost because of human idiocy. Wars and attacks unfortunately will always exist as long as selfishness and greed in this world. May God comfort the hearts of all Americans and those who lost loved ones in this attack.
10 years ago, oh btw pay real close attention to the one at the top of NBC, and CBS, you'll notice the second plane hitting the second WTC tower at 02:51. R.I.P to those who lost their lives, WTC, The Pentagon, and Pa.
don't you people realize what this means!!!!???!!!! This WAS done from one central control room and wired out to the networks to give illusion that this was just normal tragic event where all networks were doing their independent thing. WowWWW!!! This is HUGE!!!! The media was definitely complicate in this inside job. There was tv fakery!! Don't you get it?
@sssssjjjj1 I know you're being sarcastic, but I find it funny (in an odd way, of course) that there were five networks covering Tower One live (including CNN) and ABC was the only one to get a live shot of flight 175. CNN had even turned over its coverage to an NYC affiliate at that point! Thanks to the OP for the vid, it's interesting to see how it's much the same across the board until 9:03, then things get frantic and diverge. You can imagine the chaos for those who weren't miked.
@timeforbed Other TV news channels & networks who clearly showed the approach and impact of 175 live on the air include the NJ Fox affiliate, WB 11, NBC 4, and the Fox News Channel (showing live WABC video coverage at the time). What is labeled as Fox in this video is coverage from the local Fox 5 affiliate, not the Fox News Channel. Flight 175 is the most widely recorded and widely broadcast (live) plane crash there's ever been. Many networks were zoomed in on Bldg 1, where the story was.
@MrFLICKYOLI You do realize that some news companies arent as big as others and that they differ in how they report. This is within 10 minutes, usually news companies try to get confirmation of whats happening.
Its interesting how at some points at least two even three networks are using the same images. How is this possible? I thought each had their own coverage/cameras.
@laotianrose Laotianrose, I am sick of peoples theories, you did not witness it with you´re own eyes, therefore you have completely no idea of what went on inside of the tower: Sure you´ve seen so many videos, theories, and so on. But I do not doubt that it was a fireball that went down, I do not know. And neither do you.
As a Marine Corp Vet, I will say.....please think alot about what your doing and RESEARCH AS MUCH AS YOU CAN! youtube com/watch?v=v46xu-j3XMA&feature=related Most Americans are waking up to the Zionist Control!
Why , why did they do this , did they think the world was gunna stop and give them respect , no . instead the world all joined together to remember , remember what a terrible thing that happend,
I never realized how late NBC was in breaking the news of the first attack....they were really asleep at the wheel on one of the most important news stories ever.
They should have broken in regardless of the commercials.
ABC had the best live shot of the second plane. Possibly one of the most chilling live clips of all time. It makes you wonder how something like that could happen to us?
ALL LIVE SHOOTS WERE ON DELAYS AND NOT CONTROLLED BY ANYONE OF THE NEWS ORGANIZATIONS< NOR AFFLIATES(NEWS co. DONT SHARE LIVE FEEDS w/COMPETITORS SO FOR US TO SEE THE SAME IMAGE ON ALL FOUR SCREENS AT THE SAME TIME---ITS PROOF OF A SICK TV JOKE!!!!
2:52 proof of an explosion in tower 1 right before plane hit 2
@dasturdly40 There are two ways to spot the crazies. 1. They talk in all caps. 2. They think every conspiracy is true. I bet you believe every conspiracy don't you? JFK, The moon, 9/11, Roswell. You guys never believe in just one. And you have to ask yourself, given your tendency to like patterns and mysteries, what are the odds that every cool conspiracy story dreamed up is true? 9/11 is the worst consp theory ever. Frankly its insulting to the victims and to the human race in general.
@DRAT311 YOU SOUND LIKE FOX NEWS. CALL SOMEONE CRAZY AND SAY THEIR INSULTING THE VICTIMS...LIKE I KILLED THEM!!!! OFCOURSE THE FACTS DONT MATTER TO YOU AT ALL!!! SO ACCORDING TO YOU THE GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER LIED??? REALLY??? AND YOU CALL ME CRAZY??
YOU MISSED THE POINT NOONE SAID THEY BELIEVED IN ANY CONSPIRACY THEORIES...BUT YOU SOME HOW GOT THAT!!!! ITS CALLED TYPING IN CAPS NOT TALKING!!! HAVE SOMEONE PROOF READ YOUR COMPLAINT FIRST BECAUSE ITS NOT VALID. WHAT ABOUT THE VIDEO CLOWN!!
@dasturdly40 So either "The government has never lied," or "The government caused 9/11 and intentionally killed thousands of people." You don't think maybe there could be some middle ground there somewhere? I care about the facts, I don't care about the delusions you've declared to be "facts." You said the the tower blew up before the plane hit it and the media were all fed their footage ahead of time. Those are conspiracy theories. And yes, I'm officially calling you crazy.
@DRAT311 I wouldn't even respond to the Nutters. They are delusional people. To answer these guys lends credence that they even have some semblance of an arguement. What drives these people crazy the most is Ignoring them completely with silence.
Excellent job. 2:52 is fascinating to watch. Do you have an opinion on which network did the best overall job of covering the initial events that morning?
the people that watch this video, as bad as it looks, my brother, was on the plane that hit the north tower, i never saw him, we had an argument 2 years before 9/11, i would like to say to my brother, that no matter what i said, i still love you...
I Wonder If Actor M. C. (i don't know how to spell his name), saw this, as you all will remember, i think the sequal to the popular movie, "Home Alone", was tapped at new york and fl. so i'm wondering if he saw this?.
I watched that happen in my first period class my senior year of high school it was unreal... that day just wouldn't end i remember i couldn't sleep that night i just kept watching the news.
...it seems like an incredible risk to fake all this footage in NYC with millions of people potentially watching when it would be just as easy for people with those kinds of resources to just fly the planes into them as well.
c) I can believe that 9/11 was perpetrated by someone other than who we were told did it, but for someone to say that the actual footage was faked is mad frankly. There is NO reason to do that for the reasons I stated above. Don't waste time with this nonsense when...
...times the stations equipment puts in a slight delay depending on how the feed is processed. Therefore you have not synced the videos. The only way to do it would to try and find out if the stations themselves were synced to an atomic clock on that day at that time, and then calculate the offset. Again, syncing the speech proves nothing.
b) Why fake the reason for the destruction? Even if explosives were wired up, if you can do all that then why not fly planes into them too?...
There's a few things I wanted to comment on, but instead of leaving a bunch of different ones I'll just put them all together here:
a) Syncing with Bush's speech is not going to truly synchronize the times on the different videos because they wouldn't have been perfectly synced in the first place. Watch the next State of the Union on 2 different TVs set to 2 different channels next time and you'll see what I mean. The feed can be processed differently by different stations, and some...
a meme is an operating mechanism of engineered consent which, in turn, is a a mechanism of mind control a mindless droid does not mind his memes he merely SERVES his function as a membot sadly, those who would not be droids could be membots as well if they do not mind their memes
Right, not one drop of blood. Not 1 charred body, or body part out of 4 supposed plane crashes. Not even 1 crashed plane out of 4 crashes!
There is not one photo of one dead person from 9/11, except the priest at the towers who was hit by a jumper. The planes disintegrated into nothing,
but all the bodies were identified, and passports, drivers licenses, and proof of arabs on board were magically found undamaged.? They couldn't even find the black boxes for the 1st time in aviation history.
let's play KNOW YOUR PSYCHOPATHS! 1. could a socially adept psychopath could be elected president 2. what emotion would a socially adept psychopath feel upon learning that nearly 3,000 of his fellow American citizens were murdered 3. is the term socially adept psychopath an oxymoron 4. if you cannot get any of these questions right are you an oxymoron ?
a tale of two presidents: The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. John F. Kennedy "Immediately following the first attack, I implemented our government's emergency response plans." George W. Bush , 9-11-01 was this before, during, or after Bush sat down with the kiddies to read "The Pet Goat" ?
@bIZAROsPRMN11 What the hell was the response I wonder??? Nothing Happened that was good. Bush's so full of shit, he hit the alarm button, THEN WENT TO HANG OUT WITH THE CHILDREN!!!! Get the PHUCK OUTTA HERE!!!
i was 20 floors down from when the north tower was hit, i just remeber the elevator door cracked open and this stribe of fire went out of it, my friend was close to get hit, he didnt make it out unfortinatly. sorry for my misspell, but i wanted to let you know thanks for putting up this video.
@TheRStard Were you on the 77th floor? I remember from a documentary that that was one of the floors on which flaming jet fuel erupted out of an elevator shaft.
cbs, fox, nbc all zoomed in for a close up and missed the live impact, as did cnn (not shown in this vid), abc shows the "eclipse shot" also seen live by the rest of the world...
This video was a cool idea, but the music choice is oddly soothing as background for such a horrific event. I would have picked something much more somber or just omitted it.
thanks war....unfortuantly this vid did have a different audio, john lennon but Warner Bros took exception to this on his behalf so it was removed...it was replaced using you tube's audio swap function.
There's been tons of amateur corroborations of the events. As far as the color issues, who knows? I think the software tint thing is kind of far fetched, because there's also software available to correct that. So, uh, no.
thanks for your comment panic... re.the tint thing adding a tint is a simple process....putting colour back is something different entirely....and for that you need better software than ive got....editing each individual frame and replacing the colour ...thats no mean feet....but i agree is possible ...why do you think the broadcasts where such an array of colours??
Let me say first, this is a really cool video. The music is an interesting choice, but fits it respectfully enough. It's interesting to see the different video from the day. I was watching ABC.
The color thing. You can flip through channels and notice little color differences between stations. My hypothesis is these cameras were 1) exposed to the elements and mounted on top of buildings or 2) were shooting through tinted windows. The ones outside have better color on the sky.
Thank you panic and thanks for your thoughts...these were network cameras costing around 20k a peice...the sky was blue the towers white to grey...the pictures didnt inprove, in some cases got worse or 1hr 30mins period, amatures and tourists had no issues recording normal colour. Tthe tinted windows point is a good one and i will have to investage and let u know... the outside ones having better colour is incorrect....nbc's pink was a rooftop camera (rockefeller)
You can actually have TV Stations tap onto the same camera since it transmits freely. Each TV Network/Station has the ability to change image quality. Engineers always try to modify color, tint, contrast, brightness, and speed of the images that is broadcast to your TV because they want to give the "Best" image quality especially on SkyCams
ths mendota....what you say is correct...but re 911 footage....21 cameras where shown ..10 start and remain clear and are of the correct colour....11 begin coloured and remain coloured untill both towers fell... then only one camera (nbc's pink) stayed pink....all the other previously tinted camera now where magically fixed at 10:30...not one of the 11 coloured shots improved ....yet these cameras make up more than 3/4 of all archive footage across ALL the channels (exact times to follow)
If you belive the shot are like they are because cameraman where trying to get the "best" image possible....look at them...these where the best cameras money could buy....and filmed by pro's....all the helicopter footage is tinted....look at abc 7 chopper seven filmed a blue sky impact ....then by 9:18 its dark green....why was important we didnt have natural looking footage of towers....what is to gained by tinting....you tell me
Possible that the camera was exposed to elements. Do we know how long it was up there, last time it was cleaned, the condition of the lens? These would all be pertinent questions.
hi, chrysaor, excellent video. In my country (Venezuela), the TV Channels when broadcast some event synchronising and live, the pictures has a different colour and some channels are retarded some few seconds with respect to other.
Isn't it rather curious how the sky is a different colour in the four stations footage? Sometimes NY looked like industrial London at the turn of the 19-20 century...and it was a beautiful, sunny day! Simon Shack explains it all in September Clues.
contiuning answer to previous comment...the use such a small amount of strangly coloured shots for most of the broardcasts is hard to understand..for example....NBC showed at total of 5:14 secs of clear footage from 4 different cameras (2:25 from there holbokken camera...2.41 from foxes static camera...11 secs from another fox camera and a very intresting close perfect shot that only is shown for 2 secs...never show again)...
thks bongo....yes everyone should watch september clues...watch it and draw your own conclusions....re the colours....again we go to NBC (bottom right)....the camera that gave us the v.clear view of towers at the moment of impact within minutes its picture has gone a very strong yellow...the sky is yellow ...the towers are yellow...and they stay that way ...this was not filmed on a camcorder ..with is not a temperary refocusing or light issue ...imo these are applied software tints and filters
bongo...ive justed posted a vid looking at this very issue...it looks at just one camera but but it gives clues as to have the rest were done....its the first video response above
Breaks my heart every time I watch these videos yet I feel compelled to. I think ignoring it would be an insult to these poor people. May they rest in peace.
Thankfully I was only 9 when this all happened and did not fully understand what was going on. I was in class (UK) and the teachers didn't even tell us what happened. For all of you that had to sit there and watch it stream live on your TVs, knowing you could do nothing to help those poor people, I also feel so sorry for you.
I cant imagine hell being worse than it is here on earth right now. At least in hell you know what your in for, but here its allways something else. Im not going out quietly.
sorry murder...just clicked remove insted of reply on your last comment....but in answer to it...that was the impact as shown on abc...in the slower footage it appears to be a large plane however you are correct ....that is the only channel in the archives that filmed the big plane (fox's version is not in the archives)....cnn was showing abc's feed which they swiched too a couple of minutes before the impact....all those camera and everyone missed it but ABC
I was watching ABC that day. I watched the 2nd plane impact live, as it happened. I didn't know how the other channels showed it until now. I am shocked that NBC chimed in so late, while the others were tuning us in to what was happening NBC was airing a McDonalds ad.
thks ak...yes all the networks where showing each others pictures....how that was arranged within minutes was impressive....re: nbc...previous to the ad break they almost went to it @ 08:51 but the anchor was told thney werent ready...so they broke for the ad's
And thank you very much Bush/Cheney for having done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about this afterward. I hope you two die of a very painful death, with all my heart, you deserve it.
3 out of 4 major networks show the exact same image.
Now, we are talking about the MAJOR US NETWORKS all in competition between each other, during one of the most newsworthy events of modern history... Why would they swap images with each other ? But more importantly, WHY would these billion dollar news networks only show for 40 minutes - almost obsessively - ONLY the burning towers and barely any other scenes ?
Hi simon...thanks for your comments and of course its correct...the thought of all the networks showing such a limited number of shots is intersting...how a single cameras pictures can be in differing colours is also hard to understand. Re the 1:59 Jackpot and nbc. . .during the dragging together of my latest vid (which has been 3 months in the making and counting) im tackling the confusion of the cameras. . it appears nbc's chopper 7 shots, of which there are two short segments are.....
repeats from slightly after abc started tramitting the chopper seven feed ( can give the timing if need) but before any other network had shown any of its shots. Im not sure as if this is commen knowledge but I thought id mention it. . .from what i can work out . . the only the only chopper seven shots shown on nbc are a repeats of a sinlge clip. . (both clips show the same frames but one clip is longer) that is why the nbc shot seems different. . .its not live.
intresting nbc shows a replay when it doesnt show any live shots.....there is maybe 1 sec after the impact but im still checking its not a replay too.....regardless it implys someone at nbc was recording the abc live feed....and also abc was making it available too them prior to adding onscreen titles etc. as it did with the other channels ... and nbc decided to only use it for replays....v.odd
I was watching NBC live when the second plane hit, and the reason they used a different feed is because their shot was blocked by the other tower. And yes feeds are transmitted unencrypted from local cameras so anyone with the right receiver could have done the same thing. Nothing odd there.
on one of the other videos i was watchin on youtube of the live feed one of the reporters said that most news networks couldnt get their feeds becuase their anttenas were at the top of the world trade centers. this could be maybe why there is not many different angles or anything
thanks sea.....and your point is vaild one....we where told that the antenas where out off ...as a result all smalll local networks went off air ,mobile video ground feeds where lost as too was communication with all helicopers...however their cameras still transmitted there pictures and apparently there where 4 helicopers and no less than six static cameras..a good number...see how at first theres many angles but after the impact theres fewer and at the time of collapse there is only two
From 2001, even before 9/11 ... TV Stations can actually tap into another tv helicopter's feed and use it on their network feed. The helicopter is kind of a satellite truck so other stations can tap signal with immediate permission
absolutly correct...this was and is possible...i think it is still impressive it happened with 5mins of going to air...as the agreement to open the channels wasnt reported untill after the second impact....but the broadcasting of the same feed across different networks, in its self, doesnt mean alot....but when linked with the other issues....such as the amount of cameras available, tthere where pictures from 13 shown by the time of impact and some 21 by the time of the second collapse
Excellent work chrysaor911. YouTube no longer has a 10-minute rule. Can you redo, to capture those first important seconds? Also, can you do a video using Bush's speech again, but as a starting off point, synchronizing the subsequent coverage from the Washington affiliates of FOX, ABC,CBS, and NBC? Proof of collaboration between the networks in sharing the same video in real time. Yours is such an elegant simple proof---too bad you have gotten so few viewers!
thanks alot, this will help me show my mom and neighbor that they nor nobody saw the 1st plane strike on tv until the Naudet brothers clip came out. its just too bad the ABC clip starts with the towers smoking, and not the transition from the anchors or commercials to the live shot, but again, this helps!
thanks v.much for your comment...i was limited to 10 mins and the film had a fixed end time which fixed the start time..if you want that part drop me an email an ill post you the missing section but you are correct. . .no one saw the first plane impact on tv until Naudet (however Pres. Bush did say he thought it was an accident when he saw on tv the first plane hit the towers... but this explain as just a error on his part)
Brilliantly composited and a very very vital clue.
Can everyone see how the same camera shots were colour filtered by various colours even when the same shot was replayed simultaneously on 4 different networks?
These people are now exposed for all the manipulation that occurred on our TV's on Sept 11. This is no doubt the most vital clue in Sept 11 research well Done!
All four feeds were running from the one single mixing desk. This is proof positive. VITAL EVIDENCE.
ty for your comments ... it is very hard to understand how replays can be shown on diffrent networks at the same time...theres 2 good examples on the third video i posted....have a look ...let me know what u think
ty steven...It all about ABC .. the only network to show both collapses live. . Im thinking ABC was the sort of the hub (if thats the right word) . . .90% seems like it originated from shots first shown by them... might not be the case but that how it feels . . .this might also account for courtesy of ABC logos on most other channels even when abc wasnt or had never shown that shot.
Superbly brilliant genius at work here : By simply lining up 4TV networks at 4X speed we can see how the fake 9/11 broadcasts were handled in one, centralized TV studio.
This also explains why synched audio cues were heard on ALL networks 17secs before the 2nd 'plane' impact: they all came from one and the same mixing console.
Please watch this first as a spicy 'appetizer' then have September Clues (on my channel) as a main course to understand how 9/11 was pulled off.
Ive seen many efforts but all seem to be flawed . . september clues is accurate in the detail of the day and raises many issues and provides properly the best explaination for most of what occured... thus debunking is diffcult for those who find it nescessary to do so...but im sure they will contiue to try
I try to approach 9/11 from a balanced point of view. I have seen some sites that take on the issue of structure size and depth and have seen some say it has to do with focal length aperture and camera technology, etc - fair enough - im no film expert. But they dont debunk everything and dont even disucss the issue of all of Sept Clues and there is no massive debunking movement as there was with loose change.
No BBC D: ?
TheUnreaI 3 months ago
I would love to see the normal speed version, with original sounds
landship92 4 months ago
All of these feeds were taken from the local TV signals in Washington, D.C.
denelson83 4 months ago
So many lives lost because of human idiocy. Wars and attacks unfortunately will always exist as long as selfishness and greed in this world. May God comfort the hearts of all Americans and those who lost loved ones in this attack.
Brasil!!
herikbbra 4 months ago 2
I didn't even knew the word "terrorist" before this day
icarothomas 4 months ago
Wow. Way too much time on your hands.
TheodorePike 4 months ago
Can somebody tell me what the point of this video was ?
KILLBILDERBURG 4 months ago
10 years ago, oh btw pay real close attention to the one at the top of NBC, and CBS, you'll notice the second plane hitting the second WTC tower at 02:51. R.I.P to those who lost their lives, WTC, The Pentagon, and Pa.
DimeraFan28 4 months ago
Why is Fox 5's footage courtesy of WABC? Shouldn't they have cameras of their own looking that way?
bWildcat1 6 months ago
6:34 CBS screen, big white orb in the sky 2 seconds before explosion
7:48 the orb is there again, both are replays
godwill66 7 months ago
6:34 CBS screen, big white orb in the sky 2 seconds before explosion
godwill66 7 months ago
Paused at exactly 4:50 I see a plane on the right ... and what appears to be a missile on the right.
blugreen17 8 months ago
@blugreen17 You have a vivid imagination. Not even our ICBMs are that big! And they don't have blurry wings either.
dcs002 7 months ago
man. the networks got the replay fast.
chillinur36 9 months ago
don't you people realize what this means!!!!???!!!! This WAS done from one central control room and wired out to the networks to give illusion that this was just normal tragic event where all networks were doing their independent thing. WowWWW!!! This is HUGE!!!! The media was definitely complicate in this inside job. There was tv fakery!! Don't you get it?
sssssjjjj1 11 months ago
@sssssjjjj1 I know you're being sarcastic, but I find it funny (in an odd way, of course) that there were five networks covering Tower One live (including CNN) and ABC was the only one to get a live shot of flight 175. CNN had even turned over its coverage to an NYC affiliate at that point! Thanks to the OP for the vid, it's interesting to see how it's much the same across the board until 9:03, then things get frantic and diverge. You can imagine the chaos for those who weren't miked.
timeforbed 10 months ago
@timeforbed Other TV news channels & networks who clearly showed the approach and impact of 175 live on the air include the NJ Fox affiliate, WB 11, NBC 4, and the Fox News Channel (showing live WABC video coverage at the time). What is labeled as Fox in this video is coverage from the local Fox 5 affiliate, not the Fox News Channel. Flight 175 is the most widely recorded and widely broadcast (live) plane crash there's ever been. Many networks were zoomed in on Bldg 1, where the story was.
dcs002 7 months ago
Comment removed
masternoob1911 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We have thousands of profiles about girls naneedj.info
rasikanihani 1 year ago
Nice to see that NBC thought a McDonald's commercial was more important than covering 9/11.
MrFLICKYOLI 1 year ago
@MrFLICKYOLI You do realize that some news companies arent as big as others and that they differ in how they report. This is within 10 minutes, usually news companies try to get confirmation of whats happening.
asre2001 1 year ago
@asre2001
So?
Ronald McDonald can piss off while real news happens.
MrFLICKYOLI 1 year ago
Its interesting how at some points at least two even three networks are using the same images. How is this possible? I thought each had their own coverage/cameras.
djrage70 1 year ago
@laotianrose Laotianrose, I am sick of peoples theories, you did not witness it with you´re own eyes, therefore you have completely no idea of what went on inside of the tower: Sure you´ve seen so many videos, theories, and so on. But I do not doubt that it was a fireball that went down, I do not know. And neither do you.
TheRStard 1 year ago
TV Fakery and media complicity is proven BEYOND ANY DOUBTS with these images.
They SHARED their images, colors are ALL altered and there's SO MUCH glitches in them. It was a Command Center in WTC7 who controlled ALL the images.
FringeReality 1 year ago
As a Marine Corp Vet, I will say.....please think alot about what your doing and RESEARCH AS MUCH AS YOU CAN! youtube com/watch?v=v46xu-j3XMA&feature=related Most Americans are waking up to the Zionist Control!
911Truthseekers3 1 year ago
Why , why did they do this , did they think the world was gunna stop and give them respect , no . instead the world all joined together to remember , remember what a terrible thing that happend,
kinghazza890 1 year ago
I never realized how late NBC was in breaking the news of the first attack....they were really asleep at the wheel on one of the most important news stories ever.
They should have broken in regardless of the commercials.
gootenslog 1 year ago
Remembering that your subconcious is triggering 4000 times faster than this, imagine the effect of this event in your dreams.
TheTTBT 1 year ago
Боже храни не только АМЕРИКУ, но и весь наш хрупкий мир и дай нам сил бороться со злом .
MrTaipan25 1 year ago
These are images and moments in time where History took a major twist and turn. Its amazing to see surreal Images like these creating History.
boscoesarmy 1 year ago
ABC had the best live shot of the second plane. Possibly one of the most chilling live clips of all time. It makes you wonder how something like that could happen to us?
spxmet 1 year ago
I'm glad all those people died.
grayziehobbes 1 year ago
@grayziehobbes Then you'll probably go to hell.
KEMPF95 1 year ago
@KEMPF95 What hell?
grayziehobbes 1 year ago
@grayziehobbes
Well, I guess you're a true demon from hell.
Only Satin and his followers would say such a thing.
giopatrol67 1 year ago
EXCELLENT VIDEO---PROVES TWO THINGS
ALL LIVE SHOOTS WERE ON DELAYS AND NOT CONTROLLED BY ANYONE OF THE NEWS ORGANIZATIONS< NOR AFFLIATES(NEWS co. DONT SHARE LIVE FEEDS w/COMPETITORS SO FOR US TO SEE THE SAME IMAGE ON ALL FOUR SCREENS AT THE SAME TIME---ITS PROOF OF A SICK TV JOKE!!!!
2:52 proof of an explosion in tower 1 right before plane hit 2
dasturdly40 1 year ago
@dasturdly40 There are two ways to spot the crazies. 1. They talk in all caps. 2. They think every conspiracy is true. I bet you believe every conspiracy don't you? JFK, The moon, 9/11, Roswell. You guys never believe in just one. And you have to ask yourself, given your tendency to like patterns and mysteries, what are the odds that every cool conspiracy story dreamed up is true? 9/11 is the worst consp theory ever. Frankly its insulting to the victims and to the human race in general.
DRAT311 1 year ago
@DRAT311 YOU SOUND LIKE FOX NEWS. CALL SOMEONE CRAZY AND SAY THEIR INSULTING THE VICTIMS...LIKE I KILLED THEM!!!! OFCOURSE THE FACTS DONT MATTER TO YOU AT ALL!!! SO ACCORDING TO YOU THE GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER LIED??? REALLY??? AND YOU CALL ME CRAZY??
YOU MISSED THE POINT NOONE SAID THEY BELIEVED IN ANY CONSPIRACY THEORIES...BUT YOU SOME HOW GOT THAT!!!! ITS CALLED TYPING IN CAPS NOT TALKING!!! HAVE SOMEONE PROOF READ YOUR COMPLAINT FIRST BECAUSE ITS NOT VALID. WHAT ABOUT THE VIDEO CLOWN!!
dasturdly40 1 year ago
@dasturdly40 So either "The government has never lied," or "The government caused 9/11 and intentionally killed thousands of people." You don't think maybe there could be some middle ground there somewhere? I care about the facts, I don't care about the delusions you've declared to be "facts." You said the the tower blew up before the plane hit it and the media were all fed their footage ahead of time. Those are conspiracy theories. And yes, I'm officially calling you crazy.
DRAT311 1 year ago
@DRAT311 I wouldn't even respond to the Nutters. They are delusional people. To answer these guys lends credence that they even have some semblance of an arguement. What drives these people crazy the most is Ignoring them completely with silence.
boscoesarmy 1 year ago
@dasturdly40 I think your CAPS LOCK may be on. Just a hunch.
burns1210 1 year ago
Excellent job. 2:52 is fascinating to watch. Do you have an opinion on which network did the best overall job of covering the initial events that morning?
notverycrucial 1 year ago
still makes me cry
itsurfriendjoel 1 year ago
the people that watch this video, as bad as it looks, my brother, was on the plane that hit the north tower, i never saw him, we had an argument 2 years before 9/11, i would like to say to my brother, that no matter what i said, i still love you...
R.I.P - John McGuinness. :(
spursfan0712 1 year ago
I Wonder If Actor M. C. (i don't know how to spell his name), saw this, as you all will remember, i think the sequal to the popular movie, "Home Alone", was tapped at new york and fl. so i'm wondering if he saw this?.
StefanoFan27 1 year ago
ALl 4 Shannels were controlled by the ONE same Mixing desk that day.
This video is proof they used various "color filters" and gamma settings to make it appear like different footage from different channels.
OzBoyFiles 1 year ago
this day is stuck in my head. the whole week is. i think the red sox-yankees game was delayed or cancelled or something the night before.
fight779 1 year ago
wow i like cried when i saw this all
yeimi1218 1 year ago
2:52... did you see that??? if not, play it in slow-motion!!! I know who did it, it was TERRORISTS... you "truthers" can go screw yourselves
h2opolodan11 1 year ago
watch 'september clues'.
daviduk40 1 year ago
stuiped osama
JuNiA4ReAl 2 years ago
I watched that happen in my first period class my senior year of high school it was unreal... that day just wouldn't end i remember i couldn't sleep that night i just kept watching the news.
Longhornzmatt 2 years ago
All cameras stationed in prime locations, by the look of it.
Hmmmm......
faketelevision1 2 years ago
...you could spend it trying to find out the actual motivations behind what happened.
icemachine79 2 years ago
...it seems like an incredible risk to fake all this footage in NYC with millions of people potentially watching when it would be just as easy for people with those kinds of resources to just fly the planes into them as well.
c) I can believe that 9/11 was perpetrated by someone other than who we were told did it, but for someone to say that the actual footage was faked is mad frankly. There is NO reason to do that for the reasons I stated above. Don't waste time with this nonsense when...
icemachine79 2 years ago
...times the stations equipment puts in a slight delay depending on how the feed is processed. Therefore you have not synced the videos. The only way to do it would to try and find out if the stations themselves were synced to an atomic clock on that day at that time, and then calculate the offset. Again, syncing the speech proves nothing.
b) Why fake the reason for the destruction? Even if explosives were wired up, if you can do all that then why not fly planes into them too?...
icemachine79 2 years ago
There's a few things I wanted to comment on, but instead of leaving a bunch of different ones I'll just put them all together here:
a) Syncing with Bush's speech is not going to truly synchronize the times on the different videos because they wouldn't have been perfectly synced in the first place. Watch the next State of the Union on 2 different TVs set to 2 different channels next time and you'll see what I mean. The feed can be processed differently by different stations, and some...
icemachine79 2 years ago
stupid
hallnoats4ever 2 years ago
Satan's little helpers / the invasion of the mind snatchers
"they collapsed"
is a successful , though highly
auto-toxic
meme
which can turn unmembots into
membots and membots into
memoids
mind your memes
bIZAROsPRMN11 2 years ago
bIZAROsPRMN11 2 years ago
Was ist los ?
hat die amerikanische Volksempfänger
Control Your Mind ?
let's play test your knowledge of
MIND CONTROL :
which is a more powerful
MIND CONTROL apparatus
Hitler's Volksempfänger or American television ?
bIZAROsPRMN11 2 years ago
... "The interesting thing about this particular case
is that I haven't, to this day, 11 months later,
seen any single drop of blood. Not a drop. ...."
Shanksville eye witness - Somerset County coroner Wallace Miller
? that is bizarre
bIZAROsPRMN11 2 years ago
Right, not one drop of blood. Not 1 charred body, or body part out of 4 supposed plane crashes. Not even 1 crashed plane out of 4 crashes!
There is not one photo of one dead person from 9/11, except the priest at the towers who was hit by a jumper. The planes disintegrated into nothing,
but all the bodies were identified, and passports, drivers licenses, and proof of arabs on board were magically found undamaged.? They couldn't even find the black boxes for the 1st time in aviation history.
iconoclast911 2 years ago
on 9-11-01
why did
Mayor Guiliani
NOT USE his very special
Crisis Command Center on the 23rd floor of World Trade Center Seven ?
a. Guiliani did not think there was a crisis going on
b. Guiliani knew that they were going to "pull it"
c. somebody else was busy using it
bIZAROsPRMN11 2 years ago
bIZAROsPRMN11 2 years ago
bIZAROsPRMN11 2 years ago
@bIZAROsPRMN11 What the hell was the response I wonder??? Nothing Happened that was good. Bush's so full of shit, he hit the alarm button, THEN WENT TO HANG OUT WITH THE CHILDREN!!!! Get the PHUCK OUTTA HERE!!!
Their day is coming, and FAST!!!!
dasturdly40 1 year ago
nice song
miarowson 2 years ago
i was 20 floors down from when the north tower was hit, i just remeber the elevator door cracked open and this stribe of fire went out of it, my friend was close to get hit, he didnt make it out unfortinatly. sorry for my misspell, but i wanted to let you know thanks for putting up this video.
and may My friends and coworkers rest in peace.
John marlegno 37 years old.
Jessy andersono 25 years old.
Craig dan 41 years old.
my nephew, James Hartfield.
Rest in peace, i will never forget u:(
TheRStard 2 years ago 29
@TheRStard Were you on the 77th floor? I remember from a documentary that that was one of the floors on which flaming jet fuel erupted out of an elevator shaft.
denelson83 1 week ago
cbs, fox, nbc all zoomed in for a close up and missed the live impact, as did cnn (not shown in this vid), abc shows the "eclipse shot" also seen live by the rest of the world...
COMMANDERPLOP 2 years ago
is it just me or were abc and fox using the same camras?
spsailorgirl 2 years ago
Seems to me there was limited air space use at that time and probably some of them would be using the same feed... but that's just a guess
brainwashedmasses 2 years ago
the top right and bottom left are not sychronised. the top right is ahead of the bottom left. watch the time carefully instead of watching the plane
TheReggieMac 2 years ago
2:51
tennispro3782 2 years ago
nice job on the video but i just gatta know what is this wonderiss song called ?
codysellers44 2 years ago
Tks cody....re : the music....details are:-
Artist :Medwyn Goodall
Song: Temple Journey Part 2
Album: Medicine Woman III - The Rising
Time:1 0:10
Genre:Easy Listening
chrysaor911 2 years ago
thx man got it on my i pod thx man god bless america
codysellers44 2 years ago 4
no worries cody....our thoughts are with the familys and friends of all those lost
chrysaor911 2 years ago
@chrysaor911 thats nice.......
Terror187D 1 year ago
This video was a cool idea, but the music choice is oddly soothing as background for such a horrific event. I would have picked something much more somber or just omitted it.
warchildnyc 2 years ago 7
I think the music makes the video even more compelling.
kingj2038 2 years ago 3
thanks war....unfortuantly this vid did have a different audio, john lennon but Warner Bros took exception to this on his behalf so it was removed...it was replaced using you tube's audio swap function.
chrysaor911 2 years ago
There's been tons of amateur corroborations of the events. As far as the color issues, who knows? I think the software tint thing is kind of far fetched, because there's also software available to correct that. So, uh, no.
diskpanic 2 years ago
thanks for your comment panic... re.the tint thing adding a tint is a simple process....putting colour back is something different entirely....and for that you need better software than ive got....editing each individual frame and replacing the colour ...thats no mean feet....but i agree is possible ...why do you think the broadcasts where such an array of colours??
chrysaor911 2 years ago
Let me say first, this is a really cool video. The music is an interesting choice, but fits it respectfully enough. It's interesting to see the different video from the day. I was watching ABC.
The color thing. You can flip through channels and notice little color differences between stations. My hypothesis is these cameras were 1) exposed to the elements and mounted on top of buildings or 2) were shooting through tinted windows. The ones outside have better color on the sky.
diskpanic 2 years ago
One thing that's funny is... NBC is the last to break commercial to go to WTC1.
diskpanic 2 years ago
Thank you panic and thanks for your thoughts...these were network cameras costing around 20k a peice...the sky was blue the towers white to grey...the pictures didnt inprove, in some cases got worse or 1hr 30mins period, amatures and tourists had no issues recording normal colour. Tthe tinted windows point is a good one and i will have to investage and let u know... the outside ones having better colour is incorrect....nbc's pink was a rooftop camera (rockefeller)
chrysaor911 2 years ago
You can actually have TV Stations tap onto the same camera since it transmits freely. Each TV Network/Station has the ability to change image quality. Engineers always try to modify color, tint, contrast, brightness, and speed of the images that is broadcast to your TV because they want to give the "Best" image quality especially on SkyCams
MendotaTech 2 years ago
ths mendota....what you say is correct...but re 911 footage....21 cameras where shown ..10 start and remain clear and are of the correct colour....11 begin coloured and remain coloured untill both towers fell... then only one camera (nbc's pink) stayed pink....all the other previously tinted camera now where magically fixed at 10:30...not one of the 11 coloured shots improved ....yet these cameras make up more than 3/4 of all archive footage across ALL the channels (exact times to follow)
chrysaor911 2 years ago
If you belive the shot are like they are because cameraman where trying to get the "best" image possible....look at them...these where the best cameras money could buy....and filmed by pro's....all the helicopter footage is tinted....look at abc 7 chopper seven filmed a blue sky impact ....then by 9:18 its dark green....why was important we didnt have natural looking footage of towers....what is to gained by tinting....you tell me
chrysaor911 2 years ago
CBS's camera was clearly being shot through a tinted window.
diskpanic 2 years ago
thanks panic but CBS clearly tinted windows was rooftop north of penn plaza...ill find and post the exact location and footage to demonstrate
chrysaor911 2 years ago
ps....appoligies for my terrible spelling and typing...i need sleep
chrysaor911 2 years ago
Happens. YouTube can be addictive. I hate to admit it, but I've been up until 5 am watching YouTube videos about cats before.
diskpanic 2 years ago
lol....yup it can get us all disk :)
chrysaor911 2 years ago
Possible that the camera was exposed to elements. Do we know how long it was up there, last time it was cleaned, the condition of the lens? These would all be pertinent questions.
Was it analog or digital, too?
diskpanic 2 years ago
hi, chrysaor, excellent video. In my country (Venezuela), the TV Channels when broadcast some event synchronising and live, the pictures has a different colour and some channels are retarded some few seconds with respect to other.
abeleguadarramag 2 years ago
thanks very much for for your comments abel....and thanks for watching
chrysaor911 2 years ago
Isn't it rather curious how the sky is a different colour in the four stations footage? Sometimes NY looked like industrial London at the turn of the 19-20 century...and it was a beautiful, sunny day! Simon Shack explains it all in September Clues.
Bongofury361 2 years ago 3
contiuning answer to previous comment...the use such a small amount of strangly coloured shots for most of the broardcasts is hard to understand..for example....NBC showed at total of 5:14 secs of clear footage from 4 different cameras (2:25 from there holbokken camera...2.41 from foxes static camera...11 secs from another fox camera and a very intresting close perfect shot that only is shown for 2 secs...never show again)...
chrysaor911 2 years ago
in contrast they show 43:01 mins of their yellow chopper 4 fottage and 21:22 mins of their pink rockerfella shot....v.strange
chrysaor911 2 years ago
that should be 5:14 mins of clear footage
chrysaor911 2 years ago
thks bongo....yes everyone should watch september clues...watch it and draw your own conclusions....re the colours....again we go to NBC (bottom right)....the camera that gave us the v.clear view of towers at the moment of impact within minutes its picture has gone a very strong yellow...the sky is yellow ...the towers are yellow...and they stay that way ...this was not filmed on a camcorder ..with is not a temperary refocusing or light issue ...imo these are applied software tints and filters
chrysaor911 2 years ago
bongo...ive justed posted a vid looking at this very issue...it looks at just one camera but but it gives clues as to have the rest were done....its the first video response above
chrysaor911 2 years ago
Breaks my heart every time I watch these videos yet I feel compelled to. I think ignoring it would be an insult to these poor people. May they rest in peace.
Thankfully I was only 9 when this all happened and did not fully understand what was going on. I was in class (UK) and the teachers didn't even tell us what happened. For all of you that had to sit there and watch it stream live on your TVs, knowing you could do nothing to help those poor people, I also feel so sorry for you.
elmtree 2 years ago 3
thks for your comment elmtree
chrysaor911 2 years ago
JFK-the truth will be suppresed,911 is this generations JFK!
degargoyle1972 2 years ago 2
this will never end,just like JFK
degargoyle1972 2 years ago 2
I cant imagine hell being worse than it is here on earth right now. At least in hell you know what your in for, but here its allways something else. Im not going out quietly.
murderface74 2 years ago
sorry murder...just clicked remove insted of reply on your last comment....but in answer to it...that was the impact as shown on abc...in the slower footage it appears to be a large plane however you are correct ....that is the only channel in the archives that filmed the big plane (fox's version is not in the archives)....cnn was showing abc's feed which they swiched too a couple of minutes before the impact....all those camera and everyone missed it but ABC
chrysaor911 2 years ago
I was watching ABC that day. I watched the 2nd plane impact live, as it happened. I didn't know how the other channels showed it until now. I am shocked that NBC chimed in so late, while the others were tuning us in to what was happening NBC was airing a McDonalds ad.
akhenatten 2 years ago 2
thks ak...yes all the networks where showing each others pictures....how that was arranged within minutes was impressive....re: nbc...previous to the ad break they almost went to it @ 08:51 but the anchor was told thney werent ready...so they broke for the ad's
chrysaor911 2 years ago
remember what the world was like before 9/11? Before the Iraq war, before Hurricane Katrina, before the financial crisis?
We never knew how good we had it. I wish we could go back to that time.
veej309 2 years ago 2
And thank you very much Bush/Cheney for having done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about this afterward. I hope you two die of a very painful death, with all my heart, you deserve it.
onixya1969 2 years ago 2
Go to, for instance, 5:55
3 out of 4 major networks show the exact same image.
Now, we are talking about the MAJOR US NETWORKS all in competition between each other, during one of the most newsworthy events of modern history... Why would they swap images with each other ? But more importantly, WHY would these billion dollar news networks only show for 40 minutes - almost obsessively - ONLY the burning towers and barely any other scenes ?
Responses to my thoughts very welcome !
simonshack 2 years ago
Of course, I meant to say :
"Why would they SHARE images with each other?"
Just look at "the JACKPOT" at 1:59
simonshack 2 years ago
Hi simon...thanks for your comments and of course its correct...the thought of all the networks showing such a limited number of shots is intersting...how a single cameras pictures can be in differing colours is also hard to understand. Re the 1:59 Jackpot and nbc. . .during the dragging together of my latest vid (which has been 3 months in the making and counting) im tackling the confusion of the cameras. . it appears nbc's chopper 7 shots, of which there are two short segments are.....
chrysaor911 2 years ago
repeats from slightly after abc started tramitting the chopper seven feed ( can give the timing if need) but before any other network had shown any of its shots. Im not sure as if this is commen knowledge but I thought id mention it. . .from what i can work out . . the only the only chopper seven shots shown on nbc are a repeats of a sinlge clip. . (both clips show the same frames but one clip is longer) that is why the nbc shot seems different. . .its not live.
chrysaor911 2 years ago
Yes, brilliant catch Chrysaor. Thumbs up to you !
simonshack 2 years ago
intresting nbc shows a replay when it doesnt show any live shots.....there is maybe 1 sec after the impact but im still checking its not a replay too.....regardless it implys someone at nbc was recording the abc live feed....and also abc was making it available too them prior to adding onscreen titles etc. as it did with the other channels ... and nbc decided to only use it for replays....v.odd
chrysaor911 2 years ago
I was watching NBC live when the second plane hit, and the reason they used a different feed is because their shot was blocked by the other tower. And yes feeds are transmitted unencrypted from local cameras so anyone with the right receiver could have done the same thing. Nothing odd there.
icemachine79 2 years ago
on one of the other videos i was watchin on youtube of the live feed one of the reporters said that most news networks couldnt get their feeds becuase their anttenas were at the top of the world trade centers. this could be maybe why there is not many different angles or anything
seangunter 2 years ago
thanks sea.....and your point is vaild one....we where told that the antenas where out off ...as a result all smalll local networks went off air ,mobile video ground feeds where lost as too was communication with all helicopers...however their cameras still transmitted there pictures and apparently there where 4 helicopers and no less than six static cameras..a good number...see how at first theres many angles but after the impact theres fewer and at the time of collapse there is only two
chrysaor911 2 years ago
From 2001, even before 9/11 ... TV Stations can actually tap into another tv helicopter's feed and use it on their network feed. The helicopter is kind of a satellite truck so other stations can tap signal with immediate permission
MendotaTech 2 years ago
absolutly correct...this was and is possible...i think it is still impressive it happened with 5mins of going to air...as the agreement to open the channels wasnt reported untill after the second impact....but the broadcasting of the same feed across different networks, in its self, doesnt mean alot....but when linked with the other issues....such as the amount of cameras available, tthere where pictures from 13 shown by the time of impact and some 21 by the time of the second collapse
chrysaor911 2 years ago
simply the best 9/11 video ever
killcs 3 years ago 5
Excellent work chrysaor911. YouTube no longer has a 10-minute rule. Can you redo, to capture those first important seconds? Also, can you do a video using Bush's speech again, but as a starting off point, synchronizing the subsequent coverage from the Washington affiliates of FOX, ABC,CBS, and NBC? Proof of collaboration between the networks in sharing the same video in real time. Yours is such an elegant simple proof---too bad you have gotten so few viewers!
stevenwarran 3 years ago 2
these lying bastards...
lnrdshelby 3 years ago 2
I couldnt of put it better myself
chrysaor911 3 years ago
thanks alot, this will help me show my mom and neighbor that they nor nobody saw the 1st plane strike on tv until the Naudet brothers clip came out. its just too bad the ABC clip starts with the towers smoking, and not the transition from the anchors or commercials to the live shot, but again, this helps!
paindrain 3 years ago
thanks v.much for your comment...i was limited to 10 mins and the film had a fixed end time which fixed the start time..if you want that part drop me an email an ill post you the missing section but you are correct. . .no one saw the first plane impact on tv until Naudet (however Pres. Bush did say he thought it was an accident when he saw on tv the first plane hit the towers... but this explain as just a error on his part)
chrysaor911 3 years ago
what is the name of the song when the 2nd plane crashes?
AGPLC 3 years ago
sorry for the delay .... Mind Games off the Mind Games Album
chrysaor911 3 years ago
wow! it's a brilliant work!
a masterpiece!
pretty important to any kind of research!
thank you so much for posting this!
(and the other videos as well)
we must keep doing this kind of things
...and someday...
the truth will out
yohrdzayr 3 years ago 2
Thanks for your support yohr... and we live in hope and will never let it go
chrysaor911 3 years ago
fabulous
stevenwarran 3 years ago 3
ty steven
chrysaor911 3 years ago
Brilliantly composited and a very very vital clue.
Can everyone see how the same camera shots were colour filtered by various colours even when the same shot was replayed simultaneously on 4 different networks?
These people are now exposed for all the manipulation that occurred on our TV's on Sept 11. This is no doubt the most vital clue in Sept 11 research well Done!
All four feeds were running from the one single mixing desk. This is proof positive. VITAL EVIDENCE.
Nephilim70 3 years ago 5
ty for your comments ... it is very hard to understand how replays can be shown on diffrent networks at the same time...theres 2 good examples on the third video i posted....have a look ...let me know what u think
chrysaor911 3 years ago
I love the music, it's pure win!
persona19 3 years ago
cheers pers
chrysaor911 3 years ago
Awesome!!!!!!
You just came out with an extraordinary tool for counter debunking the NPT!
Cool!
curbina 3 years ago
did you notice at about 1:17 in there appears to be a plane that flys by but only in the abc footage... weird
ihatemyjobmore 3 years ago 4
yes ur right...good spot...maybe abc has special cameras...you think?
chrysaor911 3 years ago
That 1:17 thing was flying! Faster than a hologram! Speedier than a X4 frame rate! Invisible to the nuded eye!
Also, please note: ABC had first impact footage, and more impact footage than all the rest combined.
stevenwarran 3 years ago
ty steven...It all about ABC .. the only network to show both collapses live. . Im thinking ABC was the sort of the hub (if thats the right word) . . .90% seems like it originated from shots first shown by them... might not be the case but that how it feels . . .this might also account for courtesy of ABC logos on most other channels even when abc wasnt or had never shown that shot.
chrysaor911 3 years ago
Awesome!
Fight0Tyranny 3 years ago 4
Superbly brilliant genius at work here : By simply lining up 4TV networks at 4X speed we can see how the fake 9/11 broadcasts were handled in one, centralized TV studio.
This also explains why synched audio cues were heard on ALL networks 17secs before the 2nd 'plane' impact: they all came from one and the same mixing console.
Please watch this first as a spicy 'appetizer' then have September Clues (on my channel) as a main course to understand how 9/11 was pulled off.
5000000stars
simonshack 3 years ago 5
thanks simon.....and i agree ..everyone should watch september clues
chrysaor911 3 years ago
To the best of your knowledge has anyone debunked September Clues?
I keep hearing from bush 9/11 CT guys that Clues was debunked yet they dont have a source or a website.
tovarco 2 years ago
To the best of my knowledge... :O) .....No.
simonshack 2 years ago
Ive seen many efforts but all seem to be flawed . . september clues is accurate in the detail of the day and raises many issues and provides properly the best explaination for most of what occured... thus debunking is diffcult for those who find it nescessary to do so...but im sure they will contiue to try
chrysaor911 2 years ago
I try to approach 9/11 from a balanced point of view. I have seen some sites that take on the issue of structure size and depth and have seen some say it has to do with focal length aperture and camera technology, etc - fair enough - im no film expert. But they dont debunk everything and dont even disucss the issue of all of Sept Clues and there is no massive debunking movement as there was with loose change.
tovarco 2 years ago 4