Really.. Smiling S2000 in front? Why am i not surprised lol.. Look at that thing corner, effing fast. Skyline did well though, too bad at cornering it started losing speed. Though i wonder why Rx-8 did so bad? Would Rx-7 do better? i dont know.
Ok MR cars have awesome handling, to a point, but once they get loose its really hard to bring them back with the lack of weight over the front wheels. And before anyone brings downforce into this remember if you're going sideways around a corner theres nine tenths of fuck all downforce acting on the car.
haha. generalspeed360 is stupid. i love you tube and the comment page, it enables noobs, wannabes, smartass, and the like feel like they know more than books and experts. hey, itd be better if u jus watch the vids and stop commenting, it's pointless that ur right and no one believes u, moreso when ur stupid and trying to act smart. -_-
Why don't you go fuck yourself asshole!! Learn some manners. I don't have why to put up with your shit...stupid ass and don't talk about people's moms you dumbass piece of shit...i guess you know me know huh...?? Fucking idiot. Think you're a big man cuz you can talk crap about people's moms you stupid fuck??
How is it not related to cars??? Ferraris, Lambos, the Corvette, Vipers, even 350z, S2000s, and other lower priced cars use an FR layout...i never said anything about F1s.
ALL SUBARU's are gay period. Doesn't matter STi or not. All you people backing up Subaru are just getting mad because they get beat by Hondas all the time. TOO BAD FOR YOU
hey chill with that man...them imprezas are fast and are way better then hondas on wet surface and they still beat hondas when there both stock...I know I got a 1999 DC K24 swap Acura Integra with many mods but when i test drived a STi it handled better then my FF car but it was still slower in tq and top speed..but it was stock too...hmmm
hey hung...supercharging isnt the answer for everything...you can only have one supercharger and they dont boost up the car that much but they do get it over 160mph...turbos are the answers for everything and you can put as many as you like plus they give great accel. and a bit less hp then superchargers...you see where im going with this
I'd normally agree, but the thing is, roadsters are meant to be quick, responsive little cars. This is why superchargers are generally preferred over turbos on the miata.
More stupid info. Plenty of cars have more then one supercharger and plenty of good superchargers run 40+PSI the same as a turbo. Again most of what you said was crap that made ppl dumber reading it.
This skyline is a FR but only for this model...and MR cars are fast on there HP but they suck when it comes to handling...and it gets beaten by FF and FR cars because they both have a steady center gravity from the engine being on the front but since the MRs have middle engines the center gravity is pushing down in the entire car and is keeping it from turning fast especially in the rain
MRs are mid engines so most of the weight are at the middle so when your turning most of the time you notice that the car comes out of the line and start to lose more traction then the FF and FR cars...F1 cars dont have this problem because the have so much downforce that they need the extra center gravity to turn faster thats why they are so fast...
This is faulty information. MR or Midship cars have the ability handle unlike FF and FR's. By moving the heaviest component to the center of the car it actually reduces the moment of inertia when the car is turning, thus giving it the ability to change directions quicker. In addition, having added weight on the back of the car helps acceleration.
??Thats most of what I said, but drive a MR-2 spyder on the track and you notice my facts...and the engine isnt at the back its in the middle,if the engine was at the back then it would understeer and the only rear mounted engine i know of is the Porshe cars
When I say back of the car, I am saying it in relation to the FF and FR cars that you were talking about. MRs actually have the motor located behind the driver seat usually. Under acceleration, weight transfers better in a MR than a FR or FF to the back of the car, thus aiding traction and acceleration. You are incorrect in saying that FF and FR cars have better handling charateristics than a MR
Well it depends, on low power applications FF cars sometimes do corner better than FRs (i.e. integra type-r vs 325i in SCCA races do very well) However, once you up the horsepower, FF cars tend to understeer or "push" into a turn. Its a good setup for road going cars to insure saftey, but more often than not a road racer would prefer to have oversteer tendecies such as with FRs.
You know this is really funny considering that all of the world's top performing cars have an FR layout...tell me then, why would so many car manufacturers choose a setup so their cars don't have good handling??? You know you make very little sense. I'd suggest you do some research to back up what you say....
an rx7 would won the race, the rx8 is trash compared to an rx7
astorbergonzoni 5 months ago
the skyline got in the way of the wrx, especially in the corners at the beginning.
modestmoose83 6 months ago
go s2000
pranavmukesh 8 months ago
0:52 damn amazing driver
MrGuibig 8 months ago
i hate when a dumbass gets in a rx8 and thinks they know hoe one i suppose to be drive like really
peanutrylance 9 months ago
S2K....!! Hoooooooooooooooooooooot :D
sebastianug 9 months ago
I was rooting for the WRX
unknownally 10 months ago 2
was suprised to see a big heavy car like the skyline in 2nd. Nissan power to the world!!!
sunnywrc 1 year ago
Alright thats it. time to turn off the annotations.
v10moped 1 year ago
Really.. Smiling S2000 in front? Why am i not surprised lol.. Look at that thing corner, effing fast. Skyline did well though, too bad at cornering it started losing speed. Though i wonder why Rx-8 did so bad? Would Rx-7 do better? i dont know.
countpuchi 1 year ago
Not sure but i think the commentator was saying the brakes on the Impreza was faiding? lol *of course in Japanese* =P
U know u watching too many Tuner vids when u can pick up some small things they say lol
OtakuJdm 2 years ago
impressive integra Type R :) and i;ve never expect a heavy skyline can get 2nd O.O
SteveKong93 2 years ago
Ok MR cars have awesome handling, to a point, but once they get loose its really hard to bring them back with the lack of weight over the front wheels. And before anyone brings downforce into this remember if you're going sideways around a corner theres nine tenths of fuck all downforce acting on the car.
xst3v3 3 years ago
pit an MRS against those cars and see them all get raped
Skurai477 2 years ago
The Integra did well for its power.
rehmant 3 years ago
lol i love how the commenter says "battle start" but its hear like "battlo stato" lol! i love how engrish sounds lol
jnr1989 4 years ago 2
boy, the mx5 is shit.i pitty the fools that drive them. honda all way
yourmum8000 4 years ago
i would like to see a honda other than th s2k beating an mx5 in cornering u assfuck shit talker
Skurai477 2 years ago
some body here knows the name of these asics boots they use to wear???????answer please!!
alejadroyos 4 years ago
haha. generalspeed360 is stupid. i love you tube and the comment page, it enables noobs, wannabes, smartass, and the like feel like they know more than books and experts. hey, itd be better if u jus watch the vids and stop commenting, it's pointless that ur right and no one believes u, moreso when ur stupid and trying to act smart. -_-
lmf868 4 years ago 2
do i know you dipshit...i read this coment of yours and it has nothin relating to cars dumbfuck go suck on your moms dick and make a living out of it
Generalspeed360 4 years ago
Why don't you go fuck yourself asshole!! Learn some manners. I don't have why to put up with your shit...stupid ass and don't talk about people's moms you dumbass piece of shit...i guess you know me know huh...?? Fucking idiot. Think you're a big man cuz you can talk crap about people's moms you stupid fuck??
peteyj88 4 years ago
How is it not related to cars??? Ferraris, Lambos, the Corvette, Vipers, even 350z, S2000s, and other lower priced cars use an FR layout...i never said anything about F1s.
peteyj88 4 years ago
wtf my bad their man i was ganna get imf868 instead got your name
Generalspeed360 4 years ago
oops sorry i meant the WRX is AWD!!! sorry
74dp013 4 years ago
ALL SUBARU's are gay period. Doesn't matter STi or not. All you people backing up Subaru are just getting mad because they get beat by Hondas all the time. TOO BAD FOR YOU
badboy0187 4 years ago
hey chill with that man...them imprezas are fast and are way better then hondas on wet surface and they still beat hondas when there both stock...I know I got a 1999 DC K24 swap Acura Integra with many mods but when i test drived a STi it handled better then my FF car but it was still slower in tq and top speed..but it was stock too...hmmm
Generalspeed360 4 years ago
the miata was the slowest of the group
ktpellas 4 years ago
man, i was thinking the Miata
t5e2 4 years ago
It's a WRX NOT an STI. An STI would have killed them!
spirost 4 years ago
yeap JDM WRX. and it's faster than a current JDM skyline.
deweywrx 5 years ago
um if u guys havent noticed that is a wrx not a sti the even says it in the video
unrealhit88 5 years ago
wow the roadster was so slow :(
Someone supercharge that shit
hunglikehuang 5 years ago
hey hung...supercharging isnt the answer for everything...you can only have one supercharger and they dont boost up the car that much but they do get it over 160mph...turbos are the answers for everything and you can put as many as you like plus they give great accel. and a bit less hp then superchargers...you see where im going with this
Generalspeed360 4 years ago
I'd normally agree, but the thing is, roadsters are meant to be quick, responsive little cars. This is why superchargers are generally preferred over turbos on the miata.
hunglikehuang 4 years ago
More stupid info. Plenty of cars have more then one supercharger and plenty of good superchargers run 40+PSI the same as a turbo. Again most of what you said was crap that made ppl dumber reading it.
chrisdef15 3 years ago
i was like wat in the hell,,,
untill i read again and see "more stupid info" lol
shocxy 3 years ago
The V35 Skyline is slower because of it being an AWD. On dry tracks FRs and MRs are generally faster.
74dp013 5 years ago
This skyline is a FR but only for this model...and MR cars are fast on there HP but they suck when it comes to handling...and it gets beaten by FF and FR cars because they both have a steady center gravity from the engine being on the front but since the MRs have middle engines the center gravity is pushing down in the entire car and is keeping it from turning fast especially in the rain
Generalspeed360 4 years ago
if that is true about MR why are f1 cars ALL MR? riddle me that batman go back to physics class.
leadfootmf 4 years ago
MRs are mid engines so most of the weight are at the middle so when your turning most of the time you notice that the car comes out of the line and start to lose more traction then the FF and FR cars...F1 cars dont have this problem because the have so much downforce that they need the extra center gravity to turn faster thats why they are so fast...
Generalspeed360 4 years ago
This is faulty information. MR or Midship cars have the ability handle unlike FF and FR's. By moving the heaviest component to the center of the car it actually reduces the moment of inertia when the car is turning, thus giving it the ability to change directions quicker. In addition, having added weight on the back of the car helps acceleration.
leonathanwayne 4 years ago
??Thats most of what I said, but drive a MR-2 spyder on the track and you notice my facts...and the engine isnt at the back its in the middle,if the engine was at the back then it would understeer and the only rear mounted engine i know of is the Porshe cars
Generalspeed360 4 years ago
When I say back of the car, I am saying it in relation to the FF and FR cars that you were talking about. MRs actually have the motor located behind the driver seat usually. Under acceleration, weight transfers better in a MR than a FR or FF to the back of the car, thus aiding traction and acceleration. You are incorrect in saying that FF and FR cars have better handling charateristics than a MR
leonathanwayne 4 years ago
FR cars dont have good handling but FF cars corner faster..whatever at least the crowd is learning
Generalspeed360 4 years ago
Well it depends, on low power applications FF cars sometimes do corner better than FRs (i.e. integra type-r vs 325i in SCCA races do very well) However, once you up the horsepower, FF cars tend to understeer or "push" into a turn. Its a good setup for road going cars to insure saftey, but more often than not a road racer would prefer to have oversteer tendecies such as with FRs.
leonathanwayne 4 years ago
You know this is really funny considering that all of the world's top performing cars have an FR layout...tell me then, why would so many car manufacturers choose a setup so their cars don't have good handling??? You know you make very little sense. I'd suggest you do some research to back up what you say....
peteyj88 4 years ago
F1s use MR layouts and some lemans are MRs and FRs...whats up with you people writing a book full of comments, dam
Generalspeed360 4 years ago
LOL "FF cars corner faster"????? Maybe go check your facts before talking shit. In general terms FF is by far the slowest.
chrisdef15 3 years ago
x 2
3ngram5aicou 2 years ago
Faster than a Sti for sure...
it has more power under the hood.
But it seems that the S2000 lighter structure has beaten 'em all.
But i believe that a Lancer Evo would have won.
Dyghaun 5 years ago
new skyline quicker than a sti?
SCHM15 5 years ago
thats a WRX not an STi
phobiarg 4 years ago