He's just hiding from radiation 27 and magnetism 28. If the universe gets to the end of its lifespan, the dillusion will break down and we will move into pure logic realm. The rays of true and false will become so weak, that we will be in real truth. So, you have this little table that says why, wow. So, all boses buy bannana's all employee's slip on bannannas...tables and tables, its the same answer, but what about higgs? Don't assume that its just all math and extrapolation, brain power.
I must be an idiot: They said massless particles move at speed of light. But for the spaceship to fly at speed of light it will be infinitely dense as the result. What am i missing here? please explain
Thanks for this lecture. This is one of the best I've viewed on the topic. He has the ability to take difficult concepts and explain them in a clear, easy to understand way for the layperson. I look forward to whatever they discover with the Hadron Collider, and would like to see more interest in it in the United States. We get very little news coverage of it.
all these may be interesting yes, but it has no baring on us and the higgs field will never be discovered cuz it doesnt exist, the whole thinking origin of the higgs flied is based on fallacy, oh we can calculate sub atomic particle weight and form but not accurately, this is because there is some force acting on it oh lets call it the higgs field after the dumbass who discovered this ridiculous idea. plainly people this a thinking of someone who had a thought experiment when clearly high
Once they prove the higgs exits...then its going to have to be determined if it's a constant? Is the effect lesser or greater in special areas of space?
@viktorvaldemar It turns out most mathematical models are born like this (ad-hoc), and some turn out to prove extraordinary well in other areas than that of the specific problem they were design for.
On another note, yet Kim sounds and looks very excited to convey this information. At times he looks as if he is about to burst.
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
I have long believed that this universe is comprised of more than we can see or measure by physical means. Virtual particles don't just pop out of nowhere they always exist. At a dimensional level we also exist in, but can't see.
(consider) The Higgs field, and the Dark energy field may equal the Ether, Ironic?
(also consider) Universe=more than physical ergo Man=more than physical. Inevitably... Life=more than physical. It's all in the math, as they are finding now.
If you see: one theory that doesn´t match needs another new theory to match the result, and this theory brings another new enigma, and a new theory is needed to make it work, and so, and so, until you arrive to a theory with 10 dimensions which is imposible to prove experimentally ....Stop all this weird theories and go back to a simple model of the universe without all this rubbish. Keep It Simple Stupid, KISS. Maybe it is time to go back to the ether filling all the space, as Tesla stated.
@hanon1492 The ether does not exist because of relativity. Special relativity can be easily proven and demonstrated daily at large particle accelerators. Why bother with the ether? It's a dead concept as far as we know.
This guy is a idiot. You don't say things is if it can't be proven. All he said was, they don't do their job or are to stupid to do their jobs. He should be a pollitition they talk chrap that they don't know about.
I have an idea, take the average mass (of known matter) of one cubic centimeter of the universe and then divide the missing trillions of expected tons by it. Perhaps that number would be the number of parallel universes.
He says the Higgs Field is empty space. But it's not is it, because before the Higgs Field turned on there were particles so there must have been empty space for those particles to exist?
@itsonelouder1 I believe what he was saying is that the vacuum existed without vacuum energy at that time, and when the universe became cool enough, the energy switched on.
So I take it the Higg's field is a property of empty space. In other words, you can have empty space without the Higg's field, given the right temperature. What is space though? That's the key question. Solve that one and you'll know everything lol.
When you listen to lectures like this, you realize that there are fewer and fewer holes for God to hid in. At one time, nothing could be explained without resorting to "God". Now, there is less and less reason to invoke God as an explanation. A major Christian argument is well, 'HOW did the Big Bang happen, Hmmmm?" as if that is the magic question that can never be answered without invoking God. What happens to religion when we are able to answer that question without resorting to "God did it?"
@87nicoh "God is not a God of explanations or answers, He's just the God of love. And He is just the origin of all things." Good--then people should stop using "God" as the explanation for anything. And if we are going to use God as a synonym of the emotion "love", why not just call "love", "love"--why create a new name for this emotion? And how does love/god create everything? Should we study how things really originate?
When I listen to lectures like these I am always astonished by God's intelligence. The complex mathematics and behavior of atoms and forces like gravity is a testament to God's power. My friend all of this could not of happened by pure chance. If only one thing, like higgs field, were even slightly different than life won't be possible. These videos should make you believe in god not disbelief in him.
@arabjin666 It is quite possible that within our lifetimes, scientists will discover how abiogenesis occurred on Earth, and demonstrate it in the lab. It will be a natural process, without the need to invoke magic and gods. Scientists may also, maybe even in our lifetimes, determine exactly how the Big Bang happened, and maybe what was before. It will be a natural process also. Wherefor God then? God would be unemployed. As Stephen Hawking put it recently, "God is unnecessary". (cont)
@arabjin666 (cont). So when someone invokes God, they are making an extraordinary claim. I would argue the most extraordinary claim that humans have ever made. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, not mere assertions, appeals to wishful thinking, ancient texts and the like. So far, theists have not provided even ordinary evidence. In light of the advancements in knowledge and the lack of a need to invoke a God to explain things, I think the God claim must be dismissed.
@DandAinTac I'd rather start reclaiming the word "God" for the descriptive role it plays in human lives. I agree believing in magic is unjustifiable, but I really appreciate the verbal simplicity of using "God" as a catch all term for the mystery of everything we can't understand. I want to reclaim "God" for Einstein.
@thinkahol When someone says "God"--it carries with it certain established meanings. True, there's a great deal of flexibility, but at the very least, we mean a god--a being with supernatural powers, i.e., magic. So why use it as a metaphor for mystery? Why not just say "mystery" or "the unknown". There's already perfectly good words for this concept--why replace them with a word that has certain baggage and may lead to confusion about what you mean?
@DandAinTac For the same reason that proverbs are always true, because they change meaning. Although I would argue that "God" has been used to say what I describe below more than we realize. In the fight against rigid ideology and mutually exclusive and potentially violent dogma, all avenues of change should be utilized. Direct confrontation from without, and arguing for healthier understandings from within.
Similarly, when someone claims that God doesn't exists they're making an extraordinary claim. Please provide me with extraordinary evidence that God doesn't exists. Scientist will never be able to answer the most important question regarding mankind, which is our purpose. Religion provides a very beautiful answer which is to worship god. And please don't tell me our purpose in life is to merely survive.
@arabjin666 First of all--I (as well as most atheists) do not actually claim that God does not exist. We say we do not believe he does. Most of us would say we don't believe, because there is no evidence for his existence. Now with regards to this notion that "no God" is an extraordinary claim. It is never an extraordinary claim to say that something doesn't exist when there is no evidence for it. If it were, you would be making an extraordinary claim if you said unicorns don't exist. (cont)
@arabjin666 (cont)--so if you tell me you don't believe in unicorns, would it be right for me to demand extraordinary evidence from you to back up your non-belief? Of course not. If someone presents something--without evidence, it's totally reasonable for you to dismiss it--without evidence. With regards to purpose, religion provides a HIDEOUS purpose for us--for eternity, we are supposed to worship a celestial dictator whether we wish it or not. Punishment for not doing so is eternal torture.
@DandAinTac you are describng a very simplistic and obviously wrong look at A CERTAIN religion ^_._^ You are bashing a childish view on the topic while failing to understand the purpouse of ALL religions... The purpouse was to lay out moral principles but throught the years the real consepts faded out and now are mostly forgotten now and religion is used as a tool of control for the most part which it wasnt intended to be in the first place, sad really!
@arabjin666 Finally, I would say that science does not necessarily claim to provide answers to EVERYTHING. But this is no excuse to fall back on superstitious beliefs. No offense intended, but there's something infantile about needing a "Heavenly Father" to tell you what is right and wrong, and what your purpose is. We can be adults, and decide our own purpose, and figure out for ourselves what is right and wrong. It's called freedom. Cast off your chains.
@DandAinTac sience never claimed to provide answers to everything. Even the so called TOE (theory of everything) is/would be a theory explaining EVERYTHING FROM the point of Creation (The Big Bada Bang) on. Best way for religion is exepting that The Universe IS in fact God itself!
@KopaleKopale I agree with what you are saying in your post, except for the last sentence. If we are just going to call the universe "God"--why not just keep calling it "the Universe?" The label "God" carries certain implications with it. Just for starters, "God" is supposed to be all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-good, and the Universe cannot accurately be described with any of these attributes. So why try to define too very big terms which millions understand to mean something different?
@DandAinTac people believe what they want to and I think there could be a great understanding between religion and science! You cant make everybody believe in sience because many people just dont care about facts scientific methods etc. etc.
@KopaleKopale You can't make everyone believe in religion either. So should we pander to those who prefer to believe in superstition? I think that would be a big mistake. You wind up reinforcing nonsense, give it credibility by "respecting" a dogmatic ideology that does not deserve respect. Would you give the same respect to a belief system that holds that invisible elves are among us and run everything?
@DandAinTac you are completely missing the point... Im not encouraging dogmatic ideology at all! Im encouraging people to think and stop supporting a tool of manupulation that was burning people not so long ago for even suggesting a different view, for example! Im supporting the moral principles that were created by early religions and are hypocritically thought nowadays in many places. Scientifically one SHOULD kill another human being for personal gain! And I dont like that. ^_._^
@KopaleKopale No you are using a 'straw vulcan'. What is really logical has to have a goal in mind. Without goals what 'should' happen is you just sit there and then you starve and die. You alluded to personal gain, thats one goal. But it's based in human feelings, desires like wealth safety mating etc. However that's a narrow view of only short term desires. I have other desires like safety for my kids, we call them values.
So what's actually logical is how to get your goals including values.
@KopaleKopale And if you discuss something logically with someone you can argue for instance 'you shouldn't kill that person' 'why?' why did you kill him? 'I wanted his wallet' 'So you value the money and the pleasures that gives you?' 'Yes.' 'But don't you value even more the empathy for his family, the lack of regret and guilt, etc' ? And most humans answer yes here. Others yes - but I gave in to short term desires. Yet others No.(Only a few psycos).
@KopaleKopale And don't get me started on how 'moral principles' were invented by religions while ethical philosophy - a non-simplified system for debating morals - were invented with alot better outcome. Our modern day justice system does not stone people. It actually adresses the complexities of the issue of crime rather than creating simple generalizing rules.
Don't assume you can always fix a complex problem with a simple solution.
@KopaleKopale The core morals even dolphins and dogs could invent, yet another example of how the origin isn't religion. It's empathy. To see other individuals, even across species, as a part of you and feel pain and emotion on their behalf.
I'm still trying to digest your incomprehensible posts. However, you haven't begun to explain the existence or purpose of consciousness. For many, that is the true evidence of the existence of God. As for proof, it is a completely arbitrary thing for each individual. What is proof for you, is not proof for someone else. For those who have had spiritual experiences that constitute proof of God to them, it is every bit as real to them as your beliefs are to you. Who are you to judge?
Are you saying that scientists aren't impressionable, and that all of them are completely independent thinkers, unlike the rest of humanity? History is fraught with so-called scientists of the day, who refused to consider any new evidence that disproved the prevailing beliefs of the scientific community until it became so obvious that they could no longer deny it. Will Durant spoke eloquently when he said "Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance." So true, so true!
By the way, many of the theories of science which were once almost universally accepted, have since been debunked. "Proof" as it relates to science is merely the generally accepted paradigm among the scholars of the day. Many notable scientists have arrived at a belief in God as a result of science. It just happens to be fashionable to dismiss God in the interest of "science", so the impressionable mind simply accepts it without much serious reflection. It's a lot like being a slave to fashion.
@hrlefevre Rubbish. The impressionable mind you talk about that evolution has fine tuned over time so that you take what parents, elders , teachers tell you to be true without question so you don't get hurt. Once you get a little older this changes in most people and you think for yourself. A lot of animals have this ability crows i have watched myself the mother will squark once the baby will drop and freeze it will not question if it did well it would be dead.
@hrlefevre see you start off calling it theories then you say proof. A theory is not proof it is a guess but a educated one not always correct but hopefully gets you closer other scientist do the experiment to confirm or deny or some times leads them to a better theory till they have proof then it is no longer a theory but a fact. Like evolution is not a theory any more but a fact. God or gods are theories brainwashed into young impressionable minds as fact with no proof none. Dont ask questions
It isn't irrelevant to ask how consciousness can derive from insentient matter. Consciousness; whatever it is, is why we perceive and experience our world. It is that intelligence within humans that drives us to discover truth, wherever it lies.
Consciousness must also enter into any intellectually honest debate. True intellect doesn't wear blinders. It requires unbounded curiosity to discover, usually possessed only by children. It's sad that adults are so inflexible and lacking in imagination.
Funny that you should say that "you don't explain anything by postulating an untestable cause." In fact, virtually all of quantum theory is based on hypothetical notions that can't be tested or observed. They are merely derived from mathematical formulations which have yet to be proved. Science presents as many paradoxes as answers. Therefore, it has much in common with theology. Einstein, when asked if he believed in God, answered that he had tried his whole life to catch him at his work.
@hrlefevre In other words could not find it because it does not exist. Mathematical formulations are going to be a little closer then saying god did it. We are not advanced enough to prove string theory its probably not correct but it may lead us to the answer. And we should let people who believe in fairies into the science class to teach there crap if we let creationist in sorry intelligent design. We should laugh out loud at your crap and how you cherry pic things and deny every thing else.
Regardless, those who have a belief in intelligent creation have the right to express their opinion. Not everyone with a theological point of view believes that that science and theology are inherently at odds. Some embrace science as further evidence of greater intelligence. While it is true that there are many religious people who are rigid and closed minded, the same can be said of secularists, whose dogma is just as inflexible. The arrogance comes in denying others their own opinions.
I find the fact that anyone so arrogant as to dismiss God or intelligent design as being irrelevant to a discussion about science is insulting to those who think beyond particles, waves and energy fields, and consider the very notion of consciousness, where it comes from, why we exist, and why we have the desire to search for truth in the first place. Until science can begin to answer those questions, it seems there is plenty of room for open minds to explore.
@hrlefevre Actually it's not arrogant it's necessary, because you don't explain anything by postulating an untestable cause. It's possibly true but untestable and so objectively useless, which means that in a scientific discussion it is useless and therefore necessary to dismiss it.
@hrlefevre your right there is room for discussion about god, its in philosophy. god by very definition cannot be applied to science you cant measure god or find a mathematical theory of god, what your after is in the religion and philosophy section.
I wish I had friends that I can sit around with & just have the deepest fukin intellectual, mind fucking, out of the box conversations with & just get into philosophical debates & share theories... where are all these cool/smart/open minded people? Why is everybody a typical Alyssa Lala-ziano & Joey Bro-liano.. I find it so hard to believe that SO MANY people are completely uninterested in anything other than alcohol
@BscarfaceM: I hate to say this, BscarfaceM, because that applies to me as well, but life is not what someone drops into your lap, but the choices you make. Picking your friends is one of those choices. It took me nearly 50 years of my life to really understand it. Once you get there (hopefully sooner than I have), you will have no problem finding such people, and you will simply cut the noise out of your life. Do it sooner than that.
@mountainhobo Very true and I'm trying to make some change's in my life as well, but just can't do it at this time but eventually it is going to happen wish me luck.
I hear you mannnnnn.. unfortunately, most people aren't even aware of these type of discussions, much less the implications that all the new quantum theories have in our lives
@BscarfaceM I feel your pain there my friend, it's close to impossible to find people like that, if you manage to find a friend who is like that on even one single topic you're lucky, but to have one like that on many topics is difficult! Even harder to find them if you're poor and stuck in a crappy place with few opportunities. :/ If I didn't have the Internet I'd feel very isolated indeed; fortunately I don't mind typing heh :)
@BscarfaceM You could try the U3A philosophy groups. There is also a 'philosophy in pubs' group based in Liverpool. I have not attended either so I cannot vouch for their quality
@BscarfaceM I have one... it's a shame though, for him this is far too eclectic to share or discuss with other people like myself... he only gets a kick out of listening or talking with people in suits or robes or whatever real scientists use when they practice science... you see he's licensed in something while I am not.
@BscarfaceM u can say that again....i can tell u that u can go on for ever and ever and never find that last bit that is responsible for everything we see....everytime they smash something they find another one residing inside it...i wonder how long it took god to invent and make all this
@SabretoothSnowMan And about what should this man talk? you know there is no freakin' explanation about anything you see or feel...all these theoryes are just theoryes and no theory is absolutly true, therefore there is no absolute state for anything you want to hear...these theoryes are just there to make our life easyer.
wow so interesting! "by manipulating the higgs field you could create drastically new elements with completely new properties" Think of the freakin possibilities if we could ever achieve that! Considering we know of star systems that our billions of years older than our Solar system is, whats not to say that there is intelligent "life" (in the broadest of terms) that has risen to such a level of technological sophistication. YES this is all completely speculative - but also mind blowing.
A rumor has gone viral from CERN that the world's largest atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) near Geneva, Switzerland may have discovered the Higgs boson, based on an anonymous commentor posted an abstract of a leaked note on Columbia University physicist, Peter Woit's blog, Not Even Wrong. It's not certain at this point if the memo is authentic, or what the data it refers to might mean — but the note has sent the physics community into full buzz mode.
Si isn't it a mistake to watch at the stars? Because what we see is no longer there...we are not seeing what it is but what it used to be. How do we plan to explain what happens now when that happened billions of years ago?
this is great that you all work on partical physics and general relitivity but untill you scienctist understand this dark matter & energy? we may never get to the truth of what it is exactly what our universe is and whats going on so this should be the most important thing in science right now I understand the partical smasher may show particals? but dark matter is not going to be seen by this ~LHC~ to me? its gravity in its heaviness and it shows up around the the largest things like galaxys~
@55painterman "the truth of what ... our universe is and what's going on" -- we've know that answer for all of human history. There's stuff in the universe, and we're some of that stuff. Why isn't that enough for you?
@10Kernel01 oh, its enough for me, I"m not a fanatic looking for invisible things.. but I didn,t mean to make it sound that way? just to know the truth? its interesting and facts are more stranger than fiction , but if we never know the whole truth it wouldn,t bother me I believe in living a fun life and loving life and people I really don,t need to know anything except how to live a good life then die & hope someone remembers me but its still fun to know the truth its strange and fun:}
@10Kernel01 its enough for me, I"m not a fanatic looking for invisible things.. but I didn,t mean to make it sound that way? just to know the truth? its interesting and facts are more stranger than fiction , but if we never know the whole truth it wouldn,t bother me I believe in living a fun life and loving life and people I really don,t need to know anything except how to live a good life then die & hope someone remembers me but its still fun to know the truth its strange and I"m curious
The intro music made me think the prof was going to skid into the parking lot in a 1972 Ford LTD shooting a nickle plate .357 before stepping out in bellbottoms & stacks. WTF with that dean? Roll you shoulders back & get a suit.
Cool intro music....Everybody in this video should get together in the end and dance like mofo s to that song.....even that big headed silverback in the front row with a giant ' U ' for a hairline. That guys got moves!
what if the universe had ten deminsions and 22 enamerations...or flow channels...for every pattern is an antipattern (+) and (-)= balance , expansion and restriction
and for every deminsion inside of it has ten and inside of it has ten and so and so.
@RadikalWarriorIS6112 According to Isaac Newton's Third Law, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. So you're theory makes an intresting concept.
what if the universe had ten deminsions and 22 enamerations...or flow channels...for every pattern is an antipattern (+) and (-)= balance , expansion and restriction
what if the universe had ten deminsions and 22 enamerations...or flow channels...for every pattern is an antipattern (+) and (-)= balance , expansion and restriction
I dont get why vacuum energy is needed to explain fasted universe expansion. Wouldnt Newtonian physics explain that. As things get further apart they have less gravity pulling them towards the center.faster and faster universe expansion seems to be expected. also how does a chunk of big bang create enough matter to form black holes without itself being one?
@SteveUllom Vacuum energy is needed because without it gravity would eventually stop the expansion, then collapse the Universe a la Newton. So far as we can discern, gravity doesn't decrease with distance. There must be an energy forcing the acceleration.
The energy density present in the BB created the matter we observe as the Universe cooled with expansion. As it cooled, various particles formed. Over time, with further cooling, these became protons, neutrons, atoms, then molecules, etc.
@SteveUllom omg i feel like an idiot for that thought to never occur, it almost defeats the idea of the big bang being possible.....the only solution i can think of is that at the very beginning there were no individual particles or elements, everything was homogenous.....now what if black holes are simply a way of pressurizing energy to the point that it goes way beyond the speed of light and breaks away from the barrier of ZPE surrounding the universe and creates it's own.
10:06 "the field exists even without sources". would you agree that it is rather the matter in the universe that is the source. for a "particle" to move, it must affect all other particles in the universe. these interactions invoke time which leads to inertia which we perceive as mass. the idea of the fundamental particles being massless is not strange. mass is a side-effect of the interactions of these waves.
Utter rubbish. More like a soap opera. Limited scientific validity and which is highly contested and nothing new or thought provoking. The arguments, of which there are very few, are weak, badly communicated and aimed those who prefer day time television. Dynasty is more informing. Not a single new thought and too high level with no actual detail. The kind of academic that gives the rest a bad name.
A snub at the University of California. Sorry... Californ: I A.
well the higgs field sounds a lot like gravity, and as we know that gravity is almost negligible in both quantum physic and particle physics.is he higgs field a rip off from newton gravity idea? can anyone debate what i said?
He's just hiding from radiation 27 and magnetism 28. If the universe gets to the end of its lifespan, the dillusion will break down and we will move into pure logic realm. The rays of true and false will become so weak, that we will be in real truth. So, you have this little table that says why, wow. So, all boses buy bannana's all employee's slip on bannannas...tables and tables, its the same answer, but what about higgs? Don't assume that its just all math and extrapolation, brain power.
ftlqed 6 days ago
How can anything like space is so empty ...so "full of vacume" expands? It is like a ballon expand because it has no air? LOL
calvintrainer1212 1 week ago
I must be an idiot: They said massless particles move at speed of light. But for the spaceship to fly at speed of light it will be infinitely dense as the result. What am i missing here? please explain
calvintrainer1212 1 week ago
Logic question: if the Higgs field causes massless particles to slow down, why doesn't it effect photons?
piperadio 1 week ago
@piperadio
The Higgs field causes particles WITH mass to slow down.
jack3volution 1 week ago
Great videos UCtelevision! Thanks prof.!
saurabhCherished 3 weeks ago
Thanks for this lecture. This is one of the best I've viewed on the topic. He has the ability to take difficult concepts and explain them in a clear, easy to understand way for the layperson. I look forward to whatever they discover with the Hadron Collider, and would like to see more interest in it in the United States. We get very little news coverage of it.
Jan96106 3 weeks ago
@morow109 "All models are wrong, but some are useful." - George Box
dylanhoggyt 3 weeks ago
all these may be interesting yes, but it has no baring on us and the higgs field will never be discovered cuz it doesnt exist, the whole thinking origin of the higgs flied is based on fallacy, oh we can calculate sub atomic particle weight and form but not accurately, this is because there is some force acting on it oh lets call it the higgs field after the dumbass who discovered this ridiculous idea. plainly people this a thinking of someone who had a thought experiment when clearly high
morow109 1 month ago
@morow109 If true, one fortunate thing is that it will be soon discovered to not exist, and we wont just be wondering forever. So cheer up :)
tweaker1bms 3 weeks ago
wow great!
gupta5882 2 months ago
excellent
alexdalyno1 2 months ago
very interesting, thank you!
mrdrumsauce 2 months ago
lOL - What a weapon you would have if you just use the Hadron Collider as a gun.
TheLaunchingPad 2 months ago
@TheLaunchingPad you would have to bring people to it in order to kill them ;D
KopaleKopale 2 months ago
Best seminar i have ever seen on quantum physics
demirka76 3 months ago 2
Once they prove the higgs exits...then its going to have to be determined if it's a constant? Is the effect lesser or greater in special areas of space?
smoothpeople33 3 months ago
10:10 "and we'll have no EM field here".
Uh, no. There is a vacuum solution to Maxwell's equations...
csmcmillion 3 months ago
omnipresent field, christians say oh it mush be god :P
MGsven 4 months ago
I love talks like this, fast, precise, concrete, interesting!
iasedu 4 months ago
lol. he even admits that most of their theory is ad hoc. he sounds very fanatic
viktorvaldemar 4 months ago
@viktorvaldemar It turns out most mathematical models are born like this (ad-hoc), and some turn out to prove extraordinary well in other areas than that of the specific problem they were design for.
On another note, yet Kim sounds and looks very excited to convey this information. At times he looks as if he is about to burst.
xPaddy0524x 4 months ago
Comment removed
TooMuchGass 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
AllThatYouSense 4 months ago
Can't turn off your speed of light brakes?
PMlozang 4 months ago
Im Actually very interested in this BscarfaceM if you want to have conversations on this im free, i love science. no im not 34 either, only 19 =].
MattAtt4tck 5 months ago
if higgs boson are particle og god,in bible says"nobody can sees me!"
ciuluber 5 months ago
@ciuluber If someone shit themselves, noone could see that either
TooMuchGass 4 months ago
i ask if anyone can respond me,if they are infinite of dimensions
ciuluber 5 months ago
he say ummm so much
Streety101101 5 months ago
I have long believed that this universe is comprised of more than we can see or measure by physical means. Virtual particles don't just pop out of nowhere they always exist. At a dimensional level we also exist in, but can't see.
(consider) The Higgs field, and the Dark energy field may equal the Ether, Ironic?
(also consider) Universe=more than physical ergo Man=more than physical. Inevitably... Life=more than physical. It's all in the math, as they are finding now.
NotaChewToy 5 months ago
This is a video that shows that even numb nuts can consider themselves to be scientists...
Hornadayfan 5 months ago
If you see: one theory that doesn´t match needs another new theory to match the result, and this theory brings another new enigma, and a new theory is needed to make it work, and so, and so, until you arrive to a theory with 10 dimensions which is imposible to prove experimentally ....Stop all this weird theories and go back to a simple model of the universe without all this rubbish. Keep It Simple Stupid, KISS. Maybe it is time to go back to the ether filling all the space, as Tesla stated.
hanon1492 5 months ago
@hanon1492 The ether does not exist because of relativity. Special relativity can be easily proven and demonstrated daily at large particle accelerators. Why bother with the ether? It's a dead concept as far as we know.
GunsNRosesbitches 5 months ago
The speaker's facial topiary makes him look a bit quarky
ImAsMadAsHell 5 months ago
This guy is a idiot. You don't say things is if it can't be proven. All he said was, they don't do their job or are to stupid to do their jobs. He should be a pollitition they talk chrap that they don't know about.
MrAndsrson 5 months ago
I have an idea, take the average mass (of known matter) of one cubic centimeter of the universe and then divide the missing trillions of expected tons by it. Perhaps that number would be the number of parallel universes.
illustriouschin 5 months ago
He says the Higgs Field is empty space. But it's not is it, because before the Higgs Field turned on there were particles so there must have been empty space for those particles to exist?
itsonelouder1 6 months ago
@itsonelouder1 He said, "The nature of the vacuum changes as a function of the temperature of the early universe."
illustriouschin 5 months ago
Comment removed
itsonelouder1 5 months ago
@itsonelouder1 I believe what he was saying is that the vacuum existed without vacuum energy at that time, and when the universe became cool enough, the energy switched on.
illustriouschin 5 months ago
@illustriouschin so it appears there must have been empty space before the higg's field. The higg's field is not empty space itself.
itsonelouder1 5 months ago
So I take it the Higg's field is a property of empty space. In other words, you can have empty space without the Higg's field, given the right temperature. What is space though? That's the key question. Solve that one and you'll know everything lol.
itsonelouder1 5 months ago
@itsonelouder1 Hard to reply to your comment when you change your comment 3 times.
illustriouschin 5 months ago
@illustriouschin sorry, i've finished now
itsonelouder1 5 months ago
Is the Higgs Field a field of pure potential?
itsonelouder1 6 months ago
this video starts funny
Hughdapu 6 months ago
The nature of the universe is emptiness
--Buddha
Arashau 6 months ago
.......iiiiiiii aaaaaaammmmm tttttrrrryyyyiiiinnnnggg ttttooooo ttttyyyyyppppeeeee iiiinnnn ttttttthhhheeee hhhhhhiiiigggggggssssss fffffiiiieeeellldddd. Sssssssslllllooooowwwwww gggggooooiiiinnnnggg........
zachflame123 6 months ago
Comment removed
zachflame123 6 months ago
it's NOT ok!
milansc 6 months ago
I knew General Relativity when he was just a Lieutenant Colonel.
gamesbok 7 months ago 2
@dandaintac .... You got to be kidding ..
beni2500 7 months ago
When you listen to lectures like this, you realize that there are fewer and fewer holes for God to hid in. At one time, nothing could be explained without resorting to "God". Now, there is less and less reason to invoke God as an explanation. A major Christian argument is well, 'HOW did the Big Bang happen, Hmmmm?" as if that is the magic question that can never be answered without invoking God. What happens to religion when we are able to answer that question without resorting to "God did it?"
DandAinTac 7 months ago 2
@DandAinTac God is not a God of explanations or answers, He's just the God of love. And He is just the origin of all things.
87nicoh 6 months ago
@87nicoh "God is not a God of explanations or answers, He's just the God of love. And He is just the origin of all things." Good--then people should stop using "God" as the explanation for anything. And if we are going to use God as a synonym of the emotion "love", why not just call "love", "love"--why create a new name for this emotion? And how does love/god create everything? Should we study how things really originate?
DandAinTac 6 months ago
@DandAinTac You're right. People shouldn't use God as an explanation.
87nicoh 6 months ago
@DandAinTac
When I listen to lectures like these I am always astonished by God's intelligence. The complex mathematics and behavior of atoms and forces like gravity is a testament to God's power. My friend all of this could not of happened by pure chance. If only one thing, like higgs field, were even slightly different than life won't be possible. These videos should make you believe in god not disbelief in him.
arabjin666 3 months ago
@arabjin666 It is quite possible that within our lifetimes, scientists will discover how abiogenesis occurred on Earth, and demonstrate it in the lab. It will be a natural process, without the need to invoke magic and gods. Scientists may also, maybe even in our lifetimes, determine exactly how the Big Bang happened, and maybe what was before. It will be a natural process also. Wherefor God then? God would be unemployed. As Stephen Hawking put it recently, "God is unnecessary". (cont)
DandAinTac 3 months ago
@arabjin666 (cont). So when someone invokes God, they are making an extraordinary claim. I would argue the most extraordinary claim that humans have ever made. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, not mere assertions, appeals to wishful thinking, ancient texts and the like. So far, theists have not provided even ordinary evidence. In light of the advancements in knowledge and the lack of a need to invoke a God to explain things, I think the God claim must be dismissed.
DandAinTac 3 months ago
@DandAinTac I'd rather start reclaiming the word "God" for the descriptive role it plays in human lives. I agree believing in magic is unjustifiable, but I really appreciate the verbal simplicity of using "God" as a catch all term for the mystery of everything we can't understand. I want to reclaim "God" for Einstein.
thinkahol 3 months ago
@thinkahol When someone says "God"--it carries with it certain established meanings. True, there's a great deal of flexibility, but at the very least, we mean a god--a being with supernatural powers, i.e., magic. So why use it as a metaphor for mystery? Why not just say "mystery" or "the unknown". There's already perfectly good words for this concept--why replace them with a word that has certain baggage and may lead to confusion about what you mean?
DandAinTac 3 months ago
@DandAinTac For the same reason that proverbs are always true, because they change meaning. Although I would argue that "God" has been used to say what I describe below more than we realize. In the fight against rigid ideology and mutually exclusive and potentially violent dogma, all avenues of change should be utilized. Direct confrontation from without, and arguing for healthier understandings from within.
thinkahol 3 months ago
@DandAinTac
Similarly, when someone claims that God doesn't exists they're making an extraordinary claim. Please provide me with extraordinary evidence that God doesn't exists. Scientist will never be able to answer the most important question regarding mankind, which is our purpose. Religion provides a very beautiful answer which is to worship god. And please don't tell me our purpose in life is to merely survive.
arabjin666 3 months ago
@arabjin666 First of all--I (as well as most atheists) do not actually claim that God does not exist. We say we do not believe he does. Most of us would say we don't believe, because there is no evidence for his existence. Now with regards to this notion that "no God" is an extraordinary claim. It is never an extraordinary claim to say that something doesn't exist when there is no evidence for it. If it were, you would be making an extraordinary claim if you said unicorns don't exist. (cont)
DandAinTac 3 months ago
@arabjin666 (cont)--so if you tell me you don't believe in unicorns, would it be right for me to demand extraordinary evidence from you to back up your non-belief? Of course not. If someone presents something--without evidence, it's totally reasonable for you to dismiss it--without evidence. With regards to purpose, religion provides a HIDEOUS purpose for us--for eternity, we are supposed to worship a celestial dictator whether we wish it or not. Punishment for not doing so is eternal torture.
DandAinTac 3 months ago
@DandAinTac you are describng a very simplistic and obviously wrong look at A CERTAIN religion ^_._^ You are bashing a childish view on the topic while failing to understand the purpouse of ALL religions... The purpouse was to lay out moral principles but throught the years the real consepts faded out and now are mostly forgotten now and religion is used as a tool of control for the most part which it wasnt intended to be in the first place, sad really!
KopaleKopale 2 months ago
@arabjin666 Finally, I would say that science does not necessarily claim to provide answers to EVERYTHING. But this is no excuse to fall back on superstitious beliefs. No offense intended, but there's something infantile about needing a "Heavenly Father" to tell you what is right and wrong, and what your purpose is. We can be adults, and decide our own purpose, and figure out for ourselves what is right and wrong. It's called freedom. Cast off your chains.
DandAinTac 3 months ago 2
@DandAinTac sience never claimed to provide answers to everything. Even the so called TOE (theory of everything) is/would be a theory explaining EVERYTHING FROM the point of Creation (The Big Bada Bang) on. Best way for religion is exepting that The Universe IS in fact God itself!
KopaleKopale 2 months ago
@KopaleKopale I agree with what you are saying in your post, except for the last sentence. If we are just going to call the universe "God"--why not just keep calling it "the Universe?" The label "God" carries certain implications with it. Just for starters, "God" is supposed to be all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-good, and the Universe cannot accurately be described with any of these attributes. So why try to define too very big terms which millions understand to mean something different?
DandAinTac 2 months ago
@DandAinTac people believe what they want to and I think there could be a great understanding between religion and science! You cant make everybody believe in sience because many people just dont care about facts scientific methods etc. etc.
KopaleKopale 2 months ago
@KopaleKopale You can't make everyone believe in religion either. So should we pander to those who prefer to believe in superstition? I think that would be a big mistake. You wind up reinforcing nonsense, give it credibility by "respecting" a dogmatic ideology that does not deserve respect. Would you give the same respect to a belief system that holds that invisible elves are among us and run everything?
DandAinTac 2 months ago
@DandAinTac you are completely missing the point... Im not encouraging dogmatic ideology at all! Im encouraging people to think and stop supporting a tool of manupulation that was burning people not so long ago for even suggesting a different view, for example! Im supporting the moral principles that were created by early religions and are hypocritically thought nowadays in many places. Scientifically one SHOULD kill another human being for personal gain! And I dont like that. ^_._^
KopaleKopale 2 months ago
@KopaleKopale No you are using a 'straw vulcan'. What is really logical has to have a goal in mind. Without goals what 'should' happen is you just sit there and then you starve and die. You alluded to personal gain, thats one goal. But it's based in human feelings, desires like wealth safety mating etc. However that's a narrow view of only short term desires. I have other desires like safety for my kids, we call them values.
So what's actually logical is how to get your goals including values.
stiaa04 1 month ago
@KopaleKopale And if you discuss something logically with someone you can argue for instance 'you shouldn't kill that person' 'why?' why did you kill him? 'I wanted his wallet' 'So you value the money and the pleasures that gives you?' 'Yes.' 'But don't you value even more the empathy for his family, the lack of regret and guilt, etc' ? And most humans answer yes here. Others yes - but I gave in to short term desires. Yet others No.(Only a few psycos).
Religions didn't make our feelings.
stiaa04 1 month ago
@KopaleKopale And don't get me started on how 'moral principles' were invented by religions while ethical philosophy - a non-simplified system for debating morals - were invented with alot better outcome. Our modern day justice system does not stone people. It actually adresses the complexities of the issue of crime rather than creating simple generalizing rules.
Don't assume you can always fix a complex problem with a simple solution.
stiaa04 1 month ago
@KopaleKopale The core morals even dolphins and dogs could invent, yet another example of how the origin isn't religion. It's empathy. To see other individuals, even across species, as a part of you and feel pain and emotion on their behalf.
stiaa04 1 month ago
@KopaleKopale I suspect it's a pack-mammal thing.
stiaa04 1 month ago
@DandAinTac It's not freedom it's pack-mammal empathy that's the abillity to decide what's right and wrong.
Freedom seems to be a seperate issue i think.
stiaa04 1 month ago
@arabjin666
Ok, I believe in god, she's amazing!
secondrule 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"UFO Disclosure A Global Deception Conspiracy" ON YOUTUBE
is a disclosure of with held information about life beyond earth.
Contains statements from military personnel, astronauts, presidents
& politicians about life beyond Earth + it's current presence
which is being hidden from the public.
Freedomloveandtruth 7 months ago
Ok! Man ... :-)
MrMarijanke 7 months ago
I'll just make a normal comment: I love this video!<3
LiahTheLion 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No one is as blind as he who will not see -- Confucious
hrlefevre 8 months ago
I'm still trying to digest your incomprehensible posts. However, you haven't begun to explain the existence or purpose of consciousness. For many, that is the true evidence of the existence of God. As for proof, it is a completely arbitrary thing for each individual. What is proof for you, is not proof for someone else. For those who have had spiritual experiences that constitute proof of God to them, it is every bit as real to them as your beliefs are to you. Who are you to judge?
hrlefevre 8 months ago
Are you saying that scientists aren't impressionable, and that all of them are completely independent thinkers, unlike the rest of humanity? History is fraught with so-called scientists of the day, who refused to consider any new evidence that disproved the prevailing beliefs of the scientific community until it became so obvious that they could no longer deny it. Will Durant spoke eloquently when he said "Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance." So true, so true!
hrlefevre 8 months ago
I think you intended to say "you're" as in you-are, as opposed to the possessive homonym "your"; a very common mistake.
hrlefevre 8 months ago
By the way, many of the theories of science which were once almost universally accepted, have since been debunked. "Proof" as it relates to science is merely the generally accepted paradigm among the scholars of the day. Many notable scientists have arrived at a belief in God as a result of science. It just happens to be fashionable to dismiss God in the interest of "science", so the impressionable mind simply accepts it without much serious reflection. It's a lot like being a slave to fashion.
hrlefevre 8 months ago
@hrlefevre Rubbish. The impressionable mind you talk about that evolution has fine tuned over time so that you take what parents, elders , teachers tell you to be true without question so you don't get hurt. Once you get a little older this changes in most people and you think for yourself. A lot of animals have this ability crows i have watched myself the mother will squark once the baby will drop and freeze it will not question if it did well it would be dead.
gongme 8 months ago
@hrlefevre see you start off calling it theories then you say proof. A theory is not proof it is a guess but a educated one not always correct but hopefully gets you closer other scientist do the experiment to confirm or deny or some times leads them to a better theory till they have proof then it is no longer a theory but a fact. Like evolution is not a theory any more but a fact. God or gods are theories brainwashed into young impressionable minds as fact with no proof none. Dont ask questions
gongme 8 months ago
It isn't irrelevant to ask how consciousness can derive from insentient matter. Consciousness; whatever it is, is why we perceive and experience our world. It is that intelligence within humans that drives us to discover truth, wherever it lies.
Consciousness must also enter into any intellectually honest debate. True intellect doesn't wear blinders. It requires unbounded curiosity to discover, usually possessed only by children. It's sad that adults are so inflexible and lacking in imagination.
hrlefevre 8 months ago
Funny that you should say that "you don't explain anything by postulating an untestable cause." In fact, virtually all of quantum theory is based on hypothetical notions that can't be tested or observed. They are merely derived from mathematical formulations which have yet to be proved. Science presents as many paradoxes as answers. Therefore, it has much in common with theology. Einstein, when asked if he believed in God, answered that he had tried his whole life to catch him at his work.
hrlefevre 8 months ago
@hrlefevre In other words could not find it because it does not exist. Mathematical formulations are going to be a little closer then saying god did it. We are not advanced enough to prove string theory its probably not correct but it may lead us to the answer. And we should let people who believe in fairies into the science class to teach there crap if we let creationist in sorry intelligent design. We should laugh out loud at your crap and how you cherry pic things and deny every thing else.
gongme 8 months ago
Regardless, those who have a belief in intelligent creation have the right to express their opinion. Not everyone with a theological point of view believes that that science and theology are inherently at odds. Some embrace science as further evidence of greater intelligence. While it is true that there are many religious people who are rigid and closed minded, the same can be said of secularists, whose dogma is just as inflexible. The arrogance comes in denying others their own opinions.
hrlefevre 8 months ago
1:14 The talk begins here.
ninjatoothpaste 8 months ago
I would rather be called arrogant for dismissing infinite regressions than be called stupid for accepting them.
gballa4life 8 months ago
I find the fact that anyone so arrogant as to dismiss God or intelligent design as being irrelevant to a discussion about science is insulting to those who think beyond particles, waves and energy fields, and consider the very notion of consciousness, where it comes from, why we exist, and why we have the desire to search for truth in the first place. Until science can begin to answer those questions, it seems there is plenty of room for open minds to explore.
hrlefevre 8 months ago
@hrlefevre Actually it's not arrogant it's necessary, because you don't explain anything by postulating an untestable cause. It's possibly true but untestable and so objectively useless, which means that in a scientific discussion it is useless and therefore necessary to dismiss it.
ninjatoothpaste 8 months ago
@hrlefevre your right there is room for discussion about god, its in philosophy. god by very definition cannot be applied to science you cant measure god or find a mathematical theory of god, what your after is in the religion and philosophy section.
SolSmoke 8 months ago
Even though the guy looks weird, this speech is amazing.
ThePrelude27 8 months ago
ok, unless i blinked when he did, that dean at the beginning only blinked 5 times throughout the entire opening sequence.
reinux 8 months ago
If the higgs field is a field, how do you find out it's wave frequency?
SabretoothSnowMan 8 months ago
I wish I had friends that I can sit around with & just have the deepest fukin intellectual, mind fucking, out of the box conversations with & just get into philosophical debates & share theories... where are all these cool/smart/open minded people? Why is everybody a typical Alyssa Lala-ziano & Joey Bro-liano.. I find it so hard to believe that SO MANY people are completely uninterested in anything other than alcohol
BscarfaceM 8 months ago 68
@BscarfaceM you should start a google group or start a facebook page. I would like this too i may do the same im in australia sydney.
gongme 8 months ago
@BscarfaceM It is not fun to be that friend with noone that can complete the convosation. It is usually a little onesided :P
GrimTheCrow 7 months ago
@BscarfaceM you need to go to university yo
pheonex 7 months ago
@BscarfaceM: I hate to say this, BscarfaceM, because that applies to me as well, but life is not what someone drops into your lap, but the choices you make. Picking your friends is one of those choices. It took me nearly 50 years of my life to really understand it. Once you get there (hopefully sooner than I have), you will have no problem finding such people, and you will simply cut the noise out of your life. Do it sooner than that.
mountainhobo 6 months ago
@mountainhobo Very true and I'm trying to make some change's in my life as well, but just can't do it at this time but eventually it is going to happen wish me luck.
hydderlee 6 months ago
@BscarfaceM Very well said, I agree.
DementedScrew 6 months ago
@BscarfaceM
I hear you mannnnnn.. unfortunately, most people aren't even aware of these type of discussions, much less the implications that all the new quantum theories have in our lives
Artfryne 6 months ago
@BscarfaceM and i have such friends: Adi and Idan :P
sadbutterfly808 6 months ago
@BscarfaceM I feel your pain there my friend, it's close to impossible to find people like that, if you manage to find a friend who is like that on even one single topic you're lucky, but to have one like that on many topics is difficult! Even harder to find them if you're poor and stuck in a crappy place with few opportunities. :/ If I didn't have the Internet I'd feel very isolated indeed; fortunately I don't mind typing heh :)
ninjatoothpaste 6 months ago
@BscarfaceM
They're out there, keep looking.
Diemedes 5 months ago
@BscarfaceM You could try the U3A philosophy groups. There is also a 'philosophy in pubs' group based in Liverpool. I have not attended either so I cannot vouch for their quality
akanippy 5 months ago
@BscarfaceM I have one... it's a shame though, for him this is far too eclectic to share or discuss with other people like myself... he only gets a kick out of listening or talking with people in suits or robes or whatever real scientists use when they practice science... you see he's licensed in something while I am not.
Lgg130 4 months ago
@BscarfaceM If you stay in school long enough, you'll find them.
TheNeverborn 4 months ago
@BscarfaceM u can say that again....i can tell u that u can go on for ever and ever and never find that last bit that is responsible for everything we see....everytime they smash something they find another one residing inside it...i wonder how long it took god to invent and make all this
afaf233 3 months ago
This man is talking about nothing at all
SabretoothSnowMan 8 months ago 6
@SabretoothSnowMan
I see what you did there.
bdwilson1000 8 months ago
@bdwilson1000 - What I said was a play on word, he is talking about nothing. Empty space
SabretoothSnowMan 8 months ago
@SabretoothSnowMan
I know, and I saw what you did there.
bdwilson1000 8 months ago
@SabretoothSnowMan And about what should this man talk? you know there is no freakin' explanation about anything you see or feel...all these theoryes are just theoryes and no theory is absolutly true, therefore there is no absolute state for anything you want to hear...these theoryes are just there to make our life easyer.
Cassnet 6 months ago
@SabretoothSnowMan I believe he's talking about everything ...in the universe
were'nt you listening?
lol
Detrollgal 3 months ago in playlist Detrollgal's favorites
Great lecture......how many times does he say OK or MmKay? LOL
elijahputnam 8 months ago
I bet this is the reason why jesus was able to walk on water, he change the higs field there by changing his mass that enabled him to walk on water
rjohson 9 months ago
When Gladstone asked Faraday what use is electricity,
Faraday replied "One day you can tax it".
jonesgerard 9 months ago 2
String theory is sciencism.
jonesgerard 9 months ago
i find modern humanity insults the choice to make religous debate...
but seriously religion details morality and spirituality
physics looks to explain our environment
id personally no sooner use religion to explain the origins of the universe than i would use physics to explain spirituality
too many people in this world use the word creationism.. this is a scientific word in my opinion and not a religious one, sort of :S
joppadoni 9 months ago
wow so interesting! "by manipulating the higgs field you could create drastically new elements with completely new properties" Think of the freakin possibilities if we could ever achieve that! Considering we know of star systems that our billions of years older than our Solar system is, whats not to say that there is intelligent "life" (in the broadest of terms) that has risen to such a level of technological sophistication. YES this is all completely speculative - but also mind blowing.
sparticusfinch 9 months ago
A rumor has gone viral from CERN that the world's largest atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) near Geneva, Switzerland may have discovered the Higgs boson, based on an anonymous commentor posted an abstract of a leaked note on Columbia University physicist, Peter Woit's blog, Not Even Wrong. It's not certain at this point if the memo is authentic, or what the data it refers to might mean — but the note has sent the physics community into full buzz mode.
groentjealkmaar 9 months ago
7:16 MY HAND IS A DOLPHIN!!!
Alexfantastico26 9 months ago
Can we create space? or multiply space?
LovinLearnin 9 months ago
He forgot a key point, "because it's cool!"
71Merc 9 months ago
Anyone elts think this guy Looks like Tom cruise in tropic thunder ?
guildwarsnightfall1 9 months ago
Si isn't it a mistake to watch at the stars? Because what we see is no longer there...we are not seeing what it is but what it used to be. How do we plan to explain what happens now when that happened billions of years ago?
thehornypuppy 9 months ago
and this is the m' kay dimension, m'kay
erbsta 9 months ago
"maybe america can take the lead in particle physics again" facepalm, who cares about nations. who leads in what is a very sad analogy in my book.
SeekPeaceAndLove 10 months ago
this is absolutely amazing
MrAmoralez 10 months ago
better than the lecture notes given by my chemistry teacher!!!! XD
bunny153649 10 months ago
mmmkay !!!! lol
ED000111 10 months ago
Comment removed
ED000111 10 months ago
ok ok ok does he have to keep saying ok at the end of every sentence! ok!!!
dezzie50 10 months ago
If a particle had no mass and therefore had no inertia, it would move at a random velocity.
ObserverOfPakleds 10 months ago
this is great that you all work on partical physics and general relitivity but untill you scienctist understand this dark matter & energy? we may never get to the truth of what it is exactly what our universe is and whats going on so this should be the most important thing in science right now I understand the partical smasher may show particals? but dark matter is not going to be seen by this ~LHC~ to me? its gravity in its heaviness and it shows up around the the largest things like galaxys~
55painterman 10 months ago
@55painterman "the truth of what ... our universe is and what's going on" -- we've know that answer for all of human history. There's stuff in the universe, and we're some of that stuff. Why isn't that enough for you?
10Kernel01 10 months ago
@10Kernel01 oh, its enough for me, I"m not a fanatic looking for invisible things.. but I didn,t mean to make it sound that way? just to know the truth? its interesting and facts are more stranger than fiction , but if we never know the whole truth it wouldn,t bother me I believe in living a fun life and loving life and people I really don,t need to know anything except how to live a good life then die & hope someone remembers me but its still fun to know the truth its strange and fun:}
55painterman 10 months ago
@10Kernel01 its enough for me, I"m not a fanatic looking for invisible things.. but I didn,t mean to make it sound that way? just to know the truth? its interesting and facts are more stranger than fiction , but if we never know the whole truth it wouldn,t bother me I believe in living a fun life and loving life and people I really don,t need to know anything except how to live a good life then die & hope someone remembers me but its still fun to know the truth its strange and I"m curious
55painterman 10 months ago
@10Kernel01 I for one have nothing better to watch...and there is a time when fatties falling down just doesn't cut it anymore.
thehornypuppy 9 months ago
Ok, NO COMMENT I've seen on this page are actually about the main focus of the video, so here goes: WOW. My brain has been fried...
TheNightsMoon 10 months ago
The intro music made me think the prof was going to skid into the parking lot in a 1972 Ford LTD shooting a nickle plate .357 before stepping out in bellbottoms & stacks. WTF with that dean? Roll you shoulders back & get a suit.
JarJar88forever 10 months ago
hahaha he totally said building blocks in an asian accent at 3:08!!!!
xxxslayerxxx666 10 months ago
Cool intro music....Everybody in this video should get together in the end and dance like mofo s to that song.....even that big headed silverback in the front row with a giant ' U ' for a hairline. That guys got moves!
thegliphic 10 months ago
"Pretty weird, pretty weird" XD
athabascka 10 months ago
I know exactly what Faraday said that evening when the Prime Minister asked "Well this is all good, but what use will electricity serve?"
Faraday "I do not know yet sir, but I know one day you'll tax it."
TKgeniusHELLTX 11 months ago
what if the universe had ten deminsions and 22 enamerations...or flow channels...for every pattern is an antipattern (+) and (-)= balance , expansion and restriction
and for every deminsion inside of it has ten and inside of it has ten and so and so.
RadikalWarriorIS6112 11 months ago
@RadikalWarriorIS6112 what if I had 10 dicks and shoved em all in ya mouth
HalfEatenDimSim 10 months ago
@RadikalWarriorIS6112 According to Isaac Newton's Third Law, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. So you're theory makes an intresting concept.
TheNightsMoon 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what if the universe had ten deminsions and 22 enamerations...or flow channels...for every pattern is an antipattern (+) and (-)= balance , expansion and restriction
RadikalWarriorIS6112 11 months ago
what if the universe had ten deminsions and 22 enamerations...or flow channels...for every pattern is an antipattern (+) and (-)= balance , expansion and restriction
RadikalWarriorIS6112 11 months ago
i can see clue's to anti gravity being created.
accident777 11 months ago
If urinary bladder has nothing but only cystine calculus, so could it okay that It is Empty Space It's so important problem.
flowewritharoma 11 months ago
I dont get why vacuum energy is needed to explain fasted universe expansion. Wouldnt Newtonian physics explain that. As things get further apart they have less gravity pulling them towards the center.faster and faster universe expansion seems to be expected. also how does a chunk of big bang create enough matter to form black holes without itself being one?
SteveUllom 11 months ago
@SteveUllom Vacuum energy is needed because without it gravity would eventually stop the expansion, then collapse the Universe a la Newton. So far as we can discern, gravity doesn't decrease with distance. There must be an energy forcing the acceleration.
The energy density present in the BB created the matter we observe as the Universe cooled with expansion. As it cooled, various particles formed. Over time, with further cooling, these became protons, neutrons, atoms, then molecules, etc.
washmlakid 11 months ago
@SteveUllom omg i feel like an idiot for that thought to never occur, it almost defeats the idea of the big bang being possible.....the only solution i can think of is that at the very beginning there were no individual particles or elements, everything was homogenous.....now what if black holes are simply a way of pressurizing energy to the point that it goes way beyond the speed of light and breaks away from the barrier of ZPE surrounding the universe and creates it's own.
xxxslayerxxx666 10 months ago
10:06 "the field exists even without sources". would you agree that it is rather the matter in the universe that is the source. for a "particle" to move, it must affect all other particles in the universe. these interactions invoke time which leads to inertia which we perceive as mass. the idea of the fundamental particles being massless is not strange. mass is a side-effect of the interactions of these waves.
CarlLefrancois 11 months ago
Utter rubbish. More like a soap opera. Limited scientific validity and which is highly contested and nothing new or thought provoking. The arguments, of which there are very few, are weak, badly communicated and aimed those who prefer day time television. Dynasty is more informing. Not a single new thought and too high level with no actual detail. The kind of academic that gives the rest a bad name.
A snub at the University of California. Sorry... Californ: I A.
Very poor.
CarbanousaShallot 11 months ago
@CarbanousaShallot don't ya mean califorknee!
xxxslayerxxx666 10 months ago
Mmmkay?
TaterGumfries 11 months ago
CAT POO HAS BEEN FOUND ON A DISTANT PLANET !!! the unbelievable truth is in the video spacecat 175
christophehersent 11 months ago
Awesome. This lecture clarified a lot of things for me that I hadn't quite been able to grasp before. Might be time to pick up physics again.
Mornys 11 months ago
My god.. he's the Steve Jobs of Physics.
dmix09 11 months ago
I know a even better solution for the cosmological constant problem:
-"the higgs field doesn't exist"
There is a different explanation of mass if you ask me.
adolf512 1 year ago
@adolf512 I concur!
Forseti6288 1 year ago
well the higgs field sounds a lot like gravity, and as we know that gravity is almost negligible in both quantum physic and particle physics.is he higgs field a rip off from newton gravity idea? can anyone debate what i said?
morow109 1 year ago