Added: 4 months ago
From: motherboardsorg
Views: 149,533
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,439)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The Game recommends a GTX 560. Maybe not to play it at your Res though.

  • So with duel sli it will be a little better right?

    

  • Hey. Ur monitor is Dell? But is ur PC? I currently have a dell tower with ATI 5770, I was wondering if the GTX 580 is similar size/specs?

  • @scgamerd lol its not even close

  • @ATLMember Being that GTX is more compact?

  • @scgamerd idk what you mean. The 5770 is an AMD card, and its smaller, much weaker, and much less power hungry/heat producing. The GTX 580 is an nVidia GPU, its WAY more powerful and much newer, but pulls a lot more power and is bigger and produces more heat. If you're wondering if your rig could handle a 580 you need to know if your PSU is up to the task. Also make sure your cooling is decent, and make sure your processor is good, or you're wasting your money. Tell me your other specs

  • @ATLMember Dell (XPS 435MT) Core i7-920 2.66GHz, 6GB of DDR SDRAM (1067MHz) upgraded PSU to 750 to handle the Sapphire HD 5770. OP=Windows Vista. I really appreciate you helping me with the issue. Thanks!

  • The mini map in the left corner is half and the ammo display is not full too

  • play at 240p for full effect

  • Im waiting for playstation 9000+...for matrix.

    lol in everygame ...they just cant make the bush trees look a lil bit real.

  • 2560x1600 16/10 is the only way to play. blaaaa to the blueray standard 16/9

  • you is very bad! rrsrsrsrsrs

  • Oh, shut the hell up...

  • its a bit scary that he stares 24/7 at the ppl watching his videos

  • I had a staring contest with this guy. He won :(

  • lol'd hard. I play bf3 in high configuration and 1600x900 resolution with HIS Radeon 5750 1 gb, intel core i3 540 and 5 gb RAM and have 50-55 fps and it looks great.

  • @VAULTManLOL thaaaaaaaaaaaat is a shit computer

  • @WNDHRz He's recording with Fraps

  • @fnairportmovies Ummm I kinda don't get what your comment means,

  • why don't you blink? i'm really curious

  • He's running 2560x1600 on a single GTX 580. He's fuckin n00b as.

  • @goldsworthyjosh lol your the fucking noob. read your comment again and THINK. no evidence, point or even content worth reading.......

  • wow lags or its becaus sluggish 60hz

  • lol, running at 1980x1020 with a 6950 and it runs just as good, no high budget required ;)

  • 7:45

    

  • Give me one razer MOUSE :$

  • What are you recording with?

  • is there any 1080p 22"+ monitor with a glossy screen, don't really like mate, i feel like glossy looks shaper. like if a glass windows was a screen, and looks sharp cause it's crystaline

  • how is the radar out of the screen??

  • realy smoth 35 fps ?

    Buhaha 60 fps is smoth

    Inever play fps slowest than 60

  • @daniel93ss yes but remember he is using fraps to record so without fraps he got more fps :)

  • @daniel93ss that's so true, and that's why cod is smooth. bf3 is superior, but cod is more fun.

  • I can see screen tearing have you got v-sync enabled?

  • your sooooo bad

  • ............such a fucking tool........

  • Awsome!!!!!!!!

  • How could you have 500$ graphics card and be so big noob?

  • interesting to see goldberg playing bf3.. xD

  • Wait, 8GB of RAM with an i7 920? Odd ram configuration for a X58 setup.

  • dell sucks dick

  • @40ozDiRtYHaRrY40oz Why? They make decent monitors.

  • @bobmclightning idk i just never like dell for sum reson

  • Let's face it, the fire looks crap. We should have real fire physics by now! *crosses arms grumpily*

  • @kasuskasus this was the beta, fire and explosions looked like shit, the full game on pc on max graphics looks so much better. fire looks great now.

  • @MarshalBeard But it doesn't have real physics. That kind of stuff takes enormous loads of computation, heh. Was just kidding a little bit.

  • lol when im inside the metro with sniper and i aim i get 9fps D:

  • @buzz9961 lol ur specs must be insane!

  • @Quapy4 yeah lol.i have intel core 2 duo e8400 and 9800gt 512 mb and when i play with sniper instide the metro or near a fire i get 9-11 fps D:

  • holy shit this guys doesnt blink for 38 seconds, 7-45 secs

  • @cod698 that´s a real gamer xDD you´re great!!!!

    

  • I wish Microsoft would make some sort of XBox-PC mix... Where it uses controllers, and is a dedicated gaming machine, but it can have gpu upgrades and stuff like that...

  • @WeAreTwoDoorsDown its called a custon PC do it yourself whats he big deal jsut buy the pard from newegg and plug in everyhting

  • @BallerSkier You need some spell check dude...

  • Omg, an another Reptilian!

  • Comment removed

  • resolution over 3D any day. you get too used to 3D very easily and doesn't even feel fun after a bit of playing around with it. 2560 x 1600 will always be neat to have for both work and games. they should definitely try to make more affordable classes of 2560x1600 monitors.

  • lol dude u sucks on beta i got easy as sniper 50/7 xD

  • *looks out window at sky* Hey! Woah!

  • So he Spends thousands of dollars on his pc but he sucks at the game, This is most illogical.

  • @TheGenesisfreak What happend to the fun? you guys just want to be the best, dont think about the fun he is having

  • @PepsiAlienX Well Actually I play my games to have fun, It's just most people who pay thousands of dollars on their computers are super hardcore only play to be good players

  • @TheGenesisfreak No we just want to stream HD 3D porn seamlessly without any lag

  • looks better than reallife, lol.

  • O;O

    I'm desperate for a gpu like that I got a 550 ti

  • learn to play before buy this kind of pc!

  • Wait, wait. You say that you have a i7920 ? So it's running on tripple chanel? So how can you have 8gb ram? You can have 3x2gb or 3x4gb.

  • @RacingRalphEVO 4+2+2.

  • @ssanei But i thougt that it doesn't work and all three have to be the same.

  • Fullscreen in 1080p, EPIC!!!

  • Comment removed

  • nice pc but this was not battle field 3 this was where is the field 3 xD =D

  • Yeah I observed that on the new video cards and games over 30 fps is more than playable. The main thing is to be smooth, not to have high fps without being smooth.

  • im so jelly

  • yeah yeah yeah...we get it *jealous*

  • hi steve austin lol

    omg niceee

    but tell me why you noob ? xDDD

  • Reminds me of me when I started playing BETA lol! xD AAAHHH I DIED! xD :D :) ;)

  • Comment removed

  • so full grown men do play games.....hmmmm

  • His screen is zoomed in

  • poor gamer = amazing player. rich gamer = terrible gamer ^

  • @JeremyRages Racist

  • @bskdopeboy how is that racist at all

  • @JeremyRages Jobs tend to replace game practice time

  • @JeremyRages that is 100% true.

  • @JeremyRages normal gamer = normal player?

  • @JeremyRages That's because they're too busy staring at the amazing graphics rather than playing the game ;)

  • @JeremyRages haha ,I agree with that.

  • It requires DUAL 580's in SLI to max it out.. JESUS

  • @AwesomeFace50 no it requires a single GTX 570 to max it out (dont have to sli) but if you need a cheap GPU that runs the game perfectly get the GTX 560 TI its only 250$ (500$-550$ in SLI)

  • @1nbred Well to max it out 1080P and never under 60 fps

  • @AwesomeFace50 No, it really doesn't. Nvidia said that because they wanted to sell more video cards.

  • B.L.I.N.K

  • Oooohhhhh looks exactly the same as Xbox what's the fucking difference?!

  • @MrNerdOfHalo hahahahhaahhahahahahahahahahah­a b!tch please!

  • @MrNerdOfHalo If you actually have played bf3 on max settings on computer you'd see. Low on a good gaming computer is xbox quality.

  • @MrNerdOfHalo 1) This was the beta; the release version looks another notch above. 2) The Xbox version only renders at 704p, while the PC version can, as this video shows, scale up to insane resolutions. 3) To get the PC version to look like the xbox version, one has to put everything to low, and put the resolution way down to 1280x720.

  • @rjc34 Ok mate I didn't mean to have a go at PC but the days of the PC are very slowly but surely coming to an end. I don't mean that as an insult, Battlefield on the PC is probably one of the best games ever sold on the platform (extremely jealous that you can have 64 where as the Xbox only has 32).

  • @MrNerdOfHalo PC games sales are up, and continuing to rise. People have predicted the fall of PC gaming for decades, but yet we still go strong. Games like BF3 are great because they give us a huge boost as console players realize how dumbed down the versions of the same game they're getting. Smaller maps, lower resolutions, less players. As long as there is an enthusiast market to spur on the march of computer power, there will be game makers to take advantage of it.

  • Such a noob is trying to shoot friendly soldiers :D

  • is he playing on keyboard or gamepad like a controller???

  • Can you write that sentence from here 4:07 its a bit fast :)

  • bf3 doesn't use physx

  • hahaha i tink i played with you on that server

  • Ultra Settings ?

    

  • Screen-tearing as hell. Urk.

  • @Baxtexx it the beta what do you expect

  • How come things on your HUD were cut off?

  • @sebastiao2160 cuz he is running a bigger resolution than the screen supports, or the scaling has failed.

  • Comment removed

  • @sebastiao2160 he tells you at about 1:15

  • @sebastiao2160 because its was beta

  • @sebastiao2160 lol he didn't set his display properly

  • @sebastiao2160 hardcore difficulty on

  • @sebastiao2160 cuz its beta

  • @sebastiao2160 it was probably his horizontal/vertical settings causing that

  • That was painful to watch. XD

  • I feel there is a slight ghosting on rapid movement. Too much motion blur or is it the IPS panel?

  • @DrKrFfXx000000000000 The default BF3 setting involve TONS of motion blur. He most likely didn't turn 'em down ;D

  • watching in 360p doesnt do it justice

  • @codbandito It has 1080p...

  • Dude your map ? its just a corner of it XD i would preffer to play in 1920x1080p :)

  • Does anyone know where I can find xbox/ps3 gameplay on this screen?

  • i agree 35 fps min in bf 3 is playable

  • I play standard HD with everything maxed out with a GTX 570. Hardly ever dip under 30 and average in high 30s low 40s.

  • i dont understand why when new consoles come out they already have outdated hardware

  • Hay man in between 0:46 and 0:50 second whats that song that you use much appreciated if you can tell me thanks!

  • oh shit its the guy that doesnt blink

  • Well this is the BETA, it`s a highly visible difference between this and original game. I have it on my PC and I run it at same resolution with 67 FPS on Ultra but I don`t like AA so I keep it off. My Asus Mars II handles this pretty well! But on my brother PC it runs way smoother and he`s got these: 2x GTX 590 SLI, AMD FX 8120 -3.4 MHz - O.C 5.23 GHz, 8 GB Ram. He`s got 120-160 FPS with all maxed out.

  • @BlackClawReventoN damn lol

  • he isnt blinking at all o.O

  • This doesn't use PhysX, it's an AMD "gaming evolved" game.

  • i bet your frame rates are lower on caspian border or any of the bigger maps

  • how much did that all cost?

  • How much did that PC cost?

  • .... if you clic on esc and go to options - vidio you can change it from low - medium - high - ultra.... haha

  • Looks good, although your not a very good player! :)

    I also would have though that a single gtx580 would have a higer FPS rate actually.

  • @TingSdeel maybe u use lower resolution

  • @WaNFaHmi09 i play @ 1920x1080 indeed, but having 110fps....

  • @TingSdeel don't you read the title ??

  • i need help in bf3 =( all dc all the time when i tyr to play online

  • @affe524 Try disabling your firewall

  • omg maximum power usage of this monitor is 250w (typical 110w),

    almost as high as gtx 580 =D

  • WOOOOOOOWW plz people stop with al those text!! omg bla bla bla...i have better this... you are slower that.... WHO CARES!! its just a nice video... so you only have to say: "nice video" (or something)....

  • TheMightySinnerHD will be always right, PC graphics will always be better but rumored specs of the new Xbox are floating around and Microsoft didn't confirm it nor did they deny it.IF this was false they would be like "FUCK NO"but the new xbox is supposed to have 6 cores running at 4 GHz and 2or more gigs of ram and 2GPUs in sli mode and for a console thats insane and who knows what sony will do.

  • @corvetteguy1994 The XBOX my friend does not use NVIDIA GPU's anymore, they stooped to AMD, can you for sure say they are planning to use the wonders of NVIDIA once more??

  • everyone can afforad wat u have 1000 processer 550 video card...........

  • Do they know who they just killed? he could REALLY mess with them in the end....

  • Still not very impressive to me. Not for the price anyway... I would rather wait until games are more evolved in the graphic world..

  • you know we cant see that resolution if you upload it on 1080p , dont you?

  • Hey Goldberg! I got a question for you, im getting a new gamer computer so is this a good one?

    AXP 500W psp - Power Supply

    Asus P8H61-M LE / socket 1155 / DDR3 - Motherboard

    Intel® Core i5 2310 2,9 Ghz, 6MB - CPU

    4GB DDR3 / 1333MHz / CL9 - Memory

    ASUS GTX560 DCU PCI-E 1GB - Graphics card

  • @PcGamerzChanel yes that is a very good gaming pc. the only thing i would advise you to do is upgrade to a 650w power supply. also i would recommend you upgrade to 8gb of memory just to be on the safe side with games that will come out in the future. But other than those things this is a very good gaming rig.

  • @BatDanz Why should i updrage the power supply?? :O

  • @PcGamerzChanel so your bill isnt over 9000 lol

  • what do you guys think about the amd FX 6100 SIX CORE PROCESSOR? is it good for gaming?

  • @napoletano52 it is good yes, I have one and it performs very well, don't listen to people who say that the FX chips are bad. The AMD Phenom II X6's are still a little bit better for gaming with about a 5 FPS difference but the FX 6100 is a good proccessor overall.

  • @BatDanz i saw that the fx 6100 can be overclocked very well than the others six core processors, so it can perform better, what do you think?

  • @napoletano52 When its over clocked it does perform alot better that the Phenom II x6 1100t. And it does over clock very well, can easily be over clocked to 4.5 ghz without a very big temperature increase. I think if you over clocked it enough (maybe to 4.8) it would be an amazing processor with amazing performance.

  • @BatDanz what do you have now?

  • @napoletano52 My specs are:

    CPU: AMD FX 6100 @ 4.2ghz

    GPU: EVGA GTX 560ti OC

    PSU: CiT 700w

    HDD: 1tb western digital green

    SSD: OCZ 120gb (for Boot)

  • I wonder how great it looks in paint!

  • You look like the wrestler Goldberg :D

  • @CronosXIII I believe that's because minecraft is nearly entirely processed in the CPU.

  • Y U NO Blink!

  • R.I.P. headphone users.

  • @sk851097 Why..?

  • I Want Run 60000fram per Second on this Game So I Hope Can Play PS4 and Xbox720 Future Graphics With DirectX 12 =)

  • @FantasyNero ps4 will have decent graphics at the time. they have to make this system in under a certain price so pc gaming will always be better. Oh and don't expet 60k fps either lol..

  • @Shotxofxvalor I just Thinking about it my Friend , I know PC is the Best but When PS4 Released it will beat The PC games Graphics and about after 5 month PC Will be beat in The PS4 Graphics and Be Cleary Winner.!

  • @FantasyNero I highly doubt that, PS4 or the new Xbox won't be able to beat PC graphics. With GPU's like GTX 580 or a GTX 590 and 2560x1600 resolution, consoles are atleast 5-6 years behind. The reason being TV's can only support up to 1920x1080 resolution. PC hardware releases almost every 6 months with better performance each time. Consoles are good for budget gaming, but not recommended for graphically intense gaming experience.

  • @TheMightySinnerHD But you are Talking about Old Consoles 1080p it will be Gone and Come the Future im still waiting For The New Console and Future PC Gaming new Graphics.!

  • @FantasyNero If you haven't noticed there are no TV's with a resolution of 2560x1600 resolution and will not be made atleast for another 5-6 years or more, even the next gen consoles will be stuck in the 1080p generation. As I've stated before Consoles are for budget gaming, or in other words gaming on the cheap and will not adapt to highly graphical gaming experience. Though Consoles can't and will never beat PC, they always deliver awesome exclusives and I'm sure they always will. 

  • @TheMightySinnerHD I didn't Mean Like that I mean Before when was 2005 PC Graphics vs Xbox360 , Xbox360 Beat PC Games Graphics not Graphics about 3D Cartoon Movie that what i meant Check Out 2005 Pc Games graphics not in 2006 PC is the Cleary is the Winner From all Console that about sure and About Next Gen On TV Will be Sure To PS4 and Xbox720 That Must Be in Future

  • @TheMightySinnerHD We Can't see The PS3 Run 480p Like the PS2 they Change it to Next Gen 1080p they Will never be stuck because Sony if make Next Gen of Sony Console the PS4 it make sure make it with 2160p Or 4320p and I hope Too even Some of people said too Early it's every 6 years and We Reach 6 year Now to Last Nov.2012