@scgamerd idk what you mean. The 5770 is an AMD card, and its smaller, much weaker, and much less power hungry/heat producing. The GTX 580 is an nVidia GPU, its WAY more powerful and much newer, but pulls a lot more power and is bigger and produces more heat. If you're wondering if your rig could handle a 580 you need to know if your PSU is up to the task. Also make sure your cooling is decent, and make sure your processor is good, or you're wasting your money. Tell me your other specs
@ATLMember Dell (XPS 435MT) Core i7-920 2.66GHz, 6GB of DDR SDRAM (1067MHz) upgraded PSU to 750 to handle the Sapphire HD 5770. OP=Windows Vista. I really appreciate you helping me with the issue. Thanks!
lol'd hard. I play bf3 in high configuration and 1600x900 resolution with HIS Radeon 5750 1 gb, intel core i3 540 and 5 gb RAM and have 50-55 fps and it looks great.
is there any 1080p 22"+ monitor with a glossy screen, don't really like mate, i feel like glossy looks shaper. like if a glass windows was a screen, and looks sharp cause it's crystaline
I wish Microsoft would make some sort of XBox-PC mix... Where it uses controllers, and is a dedicated gaming machine, but it can have gpu upgrades and stuff like that...
resolution over 3D any day. you get too used to 3D very easily and doesn't even feel fun after a bit of playing around with it. 2560 x 1600 will always be neat to have for both work and games. they should definitely try to make more affordable classes of 2560x1600 monitors.
@PepsiAlienX Well Actually I play my games to have fun, It's just most people who pay thousands of dollars on their computers are super hardcore only play to be good players
Yeah I observed that on the new video cards and games over 30 fps is more than playable. The main thing is to be smooth, not to have high fps without being smooth.
@AwesomeFace50 no it requires a single GTX 570 to max it out (dont have to sli) but if you need a cheap GPU that runs the game perfectly get the GTX 560 TI its only 250$ (500$-550$ in SLI)
@MrNerdOfHalo 1) This was the beta; the release version looks another notch above. 2) The Xbox version only renders at 704p, while the PC version can, as this video shows, scale up to insane resolutions. 3) To get the PC version to look like the xbox version, one has to put everything to low, and put the resolution way down to 1280x720.
@rjc34 Ok mate I didn't mean to have a go at PC but the days of the PC are very slowly but surely coming to an end. I don't mean that as an insult, Battlefield on the PC is probably one of the best games ever sold on the platform (extremely jealous that you can have 64 where as the Xbox only has 32).
@MrNerdOfHalo PC games sales are up, and continuing to rise. People have predicted the fall of PC gaming for decades, but yet we still go strong. Games like BF3 are great because they give us a huge boost as console players realize how dumbed down the versions of the same game they're getting. Smaller maps, lower resolutions, less players. As long as there is an enthusiast market to spur on the march of computer power, there will be game makers to take advantage of it.
Well this is the BETA, it`s a highly visible difference between this and original game. I have it on my PC and I run it at same resolution with 67 FPS on Ultra but I don`t like AA so I keep it off. My Asus Mars II handles this pretty well! But on my brother PC it runs way smoother and he`s got these: 2x GTX 590 SLI, AMD FX 8120 -3.4 MHz - O.C 5.23 GHz, 8 GB Ram. He`s got 120-160 FPS with all maxed out.
WOOOOOOOWW plz people stop with al those text!! omg bla bla bla...i have better this... you are slower that.... WHO CARES!! its just a nice video... so you only have to say: "nice video" (or something)....
TheMightySinnerHD will be always right, PC graphics will always be better but rumored specs of the new Xbox are floating around and Microsoft didn't confirm it nor did they deny it.IF this was false they would be like "FUCK NO"but the new xbox is supposed to have 6 cores running at 4 GHz and 2or more gigs of ram and 2GPUs in sli mode and for a console thats insane and who knows what sony will do.
@corvetteguy1994 The XBOX my friend does not use NVIDIA GPU's anymore, they stooped to AMD, can you for sure say they are planning to use the wonders of NVIDIA once more??
@PcGamerzChanel yes that is a very good gaming pc. the only thing i would advise you to do is upgrade to a 650w power supply. also i would recommend you upgrade to 8gb of memory just to be on the safe side with games that will come out in the future. But other than those things this is a very good gaming rig.
@napoletano52 it is good yes, I have one and it performs very well, don't listen to people who say that the FX chips are bad. The AMD Phenom II X6's are still a little bit better for gaming with about a 5 FPS difference but the FX 6100 is a good proccessor overall.
@napoletano52 When its over clocked it does perform alot better that the Phenom II x6 1100t. And it does over clock very well, can easily be over clocked to 4.5 ghz without a very big temperature increase. I think if you over clocked it enough (maybe to 4.8) it would be an amazing processor with amazing performance.
@FantasyNero ps4 will have decent graphics at the time. they have to make this system in under a certain price so pc gaming will always be better. Oh and don't expet 60k fps either lol..
@Shotxofxvalor I just Thinking about it my Friend , I know PC is the Best but When PS4 Released it will beat The PC games Graphics and about after 5 month PC Will be beat in The PS4 Graphics and Be Cleary Winner.!
@FantasyNero I highly doubt that, PS4 or the new Xbox won't be able to beat PC graphics. With GPU's like GTX 580 or a GTX 590 and 2560x1600 resolution, consoles are atleast 5-6 years behind. The reason being TV's can only support up to 1920x1080 resolution. PC hardware releases almost every 6 months with better performance each time. Consoles are good for budget gaming, but not recommended for graphically intense gaming experience.
@TheMightySinnerHD But you are Talking about Old Consoles 1080p it will be Gone and Come the Future im still waiting For The New Console and Future PC Gaming new Graphics.!
@FantasyNero If you haven't noticed there are no TV's with a resolution of 2560x1600 resolution and will not be made atleast for another 5-6 years or more, even the next gen consoles will be stuck in the 1080p generation. As I've stated before Consoles are for budget gaming, or in other words gaming on the cheap and will not adapt to highly graphical gaming experience. Though Consoles can't and will never beat PC, they always deliver awesome exclusives and I'm sure they always will.
@TheMightySinnerHD I didn't Mean Like that I mean Before when was 2005 PC Graphics vs Xbox360 , Xbox360 Beat PC Games Graphics not Graphics about 3D Cartoon Movie that what i meant Check Out 2005 Pc Games graphics not in 2006 PC is the Cleary is the Winner From all Console that about sure and About Next Gen On TV Will be Sure To PS4 and Xbox720 That Must Be in Future
@TheMightySinnerHD We Can't see The PS3 Run 480p Like the PS2 they Change it to Next Gen 1080p they Will never be stuck because Sony if make Next Gen of Sony Console the PS4 it make sure make it with 2160p Or 4320p and I hope Too even Some of people said too Early it's every 6 years and We Reach 6 year Now to Last Nov.2012
The Game recommends a GTX 560. Maybe not to play it at your Res though.
JJMWOOD 1 day ago
So with duel sli it will be a little better right?
Laxxmiddie 2 days ago
Hey. Ur monitor is Dell? But is ur PC? I currently have a dell tower with ATI 5770, I was wondering if the GTX 580 is similar size/specs?
scgamerd 2 days ago
@scgamerd lol its not even close
ATLMember 1 day ago
@ATLMember Being that GTX is more compact?
scgamerd 1 day ago
@scgamerd idk what you mean. The 5770 is an AMD card, and its smaller, much weaker, and much less power hungry/heat producing. The GTX 580 is an nVidia GPU, its WAY more powerful and much newer, but pulls a lot more power and is bigger and produces more heat. If you're wondering if your rig could handle a 580 you need to know if your PSU is up to the task. Also make sure your cooling is decent, and make sure your processor is good, or you're wasting your money. Tell me your other specs
ATLMember 1 day ago
@ATLMember Dell (XPS 435MT) Core i7-920 2.66GHz, 6GB of DDR SDRAM (1067MHz) upgraded PSU to 750 to handle the Sapphire HD 5770. OP=Windows Vista. I really appreciate you helping me with the issue. Thanks!
scgamerd 15 hours ago
The mini map in the left corner is half and the ammo display is not full too
MrJohhny98 5 days ago
play at 240p for full effect
AppEffect 5 days ago
Im waiting for playstation 9000+...for matrix.
lol in everygame ...they just cant make the bush trees look a lil bit real.
DeathKnocksAtTheDoor 5 days ago
2560x1600 16/10 is the only way to play. blaaaa to the blueray standard 16/9
mrfastreaction 1 week ago
you is very bad! rrsrsrsrsrs
icaro2012and2012 1 week ago
Oh, shut the hell up...
belmordok 1 week ago
its a bit scary that he stares 24/7 at the ppl watching his videos
valteri0007 1 week ago
I had a staring contest with this guy. He won :(
tristannolan1 1 week ago
lol'd hard. I play bf3 in high configuration and 1600x900 resolution with HIS Radeon 5750 1 gb, intel core i3 540 and 5 gb RAM and have 50-55 fps and it looks great.
VAULTManLOL 1 week ago
@VAULTManLOL thaaaaaaaaaaaat is a shit computer
Jay2097 1 week ago
@WNDHRz He's recording with Fraps
cod698 1 week ago
@fnairportmovies Ummm I kinda don't get what your comment means,
cod698 1 week ago
why don't you blink? i'm really curious
pewpewlololo 1 week ago
He's running 2560x1600 on a single GTX 580. He's fuckin n00b as.
goldsworthyjosh 1 week ago
@goldsworthyjosh lol your the fucking noob. read your comment again and THINK. no evidence, point or even content worth reading.......
galaxiesaver 1 week ago
wow lags or its becaus sluggish 60hz
Cuteandbrutal 1 week ago
lol, running at 1980x1020 with a 6950 and it runs just as good, no high budget required ;)
PitbullNL 1 week ago
7:45
TheAwaisVEVO 1 week ago
Give me one razer MOUSE :$
TheFragic 1 week ago
What are you recording with?
WNDHRz 1 week ago
is there any 1080p 22"+ monitor with a glossy screen, don't really like mate, i feel like glossy looks shaper. like if a glass windows was a screen, and looks sharp cause it's crystaline
iNf3rNuSdI4bLuS1 1 week ago
how is the radar out of the screen??
Swagsta0 2 weeks ago
realy smoth 35 fps ?
Buhaha 60 fps is smoth
Inever play fps slowest than 60
daniel93ss 2 weeks ago
@daniel93ss yes but remember he is using fraps to record so without fraps he got more fps :)
lars38010 2 weeks ago
@daniel93ss that's so true, and that's why cod is smooth. bf3 is superior, but cod is more fun.
hX4r15 2 weeks ago
I can see screen tearing have you got v-sync enabled?
evo440 2 weeks ago
your sooooo bad
GadgetTheGuys 2 weeks ago
............such a fucking tool........
SATANECRONOMICUS 2 weeks ago 11
Awsome!!!!!!!!
LittleBigMuslimTV 2 weeks ago
How could you have 500$ graphics card and be so big noob?
Cribs00 2 weeks ago
interesting to see goldberg playing bf3.. xD
MrLionGamer 2 weeks ago
Wait, 8GB of RAM with an i7 920? Odd ram configuration for a X58 setup.
christoiMc 3 weeks ago
dell sucks dick
40ozDiRtYHaRrY40oz 3 weeks ago
@40ozDiRtYHaRrY40oz Why? They make decent monitors.
bobmclightning 3 weeks ago
@bobmclightning idk i just never like dell for sum reson
40ozDiRtYHaRrY40oz 3 weeks ago
Let's face it, the fire looks crap. We should have real fire physics by now! *crosses arms grumpily*
kasuskasus 3 weeks ago
@kasuskasus this was the beta, fire and explosions looked like shit, the full game on pc on max graphics looks so much better. fire looks great now.
MarshalBeard 3 weeks ago
@MarshalBeard But it doesn't have real physics. That kind of stuff takes enormous loads of computation, heh. Was just kidding a little bit.
kasuskasus 3 weeks ago
lol when im inside the metro with sniper and i aim i get 9fps D:
buzz9961 3 weeks ago
@buzz9961 lol ur specs must be insane!
Quapy4 3 weeks ago
@Quapy4 yeah lol.i have intel core 2 duo e8400 and 9800gt 512 mb and when i play with sniper instide the metro or near a fire i get 9-11 fps D:
buzz9961 3 weeks ago
holy shit this guys doesnt blink for 38 seconds, 7-45 secs
cod698 3 weeks ago 48
@cod698 that´s a real gamer xDD you´re great!!!!
fnairportmovies 1 week ago
I wish Microsoft would make some sort of XBox-PC mix... Where it uses controllers, and is a dedicated gaming machine, but it can have gpu upgrades and stuff like that...
WeAreTwoDoorsDown 3 weeks ago
@WeAreTwoDoorsDown its called a custon PC do it yourself whats he big deal jsut buy the pard from newegg and plug in everyhting
BallerSkier 3 weeks ago
@BallerSkier You need some spell check dude...
WeAreTwoDoorsDown 3 weeks ago
Omg, an another Reptilian!
belmordok 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
fawkinjoocy 3 weeks ago
resolution over 3D any day. you get too used to 3D very easily and doesn't even feel fun after a bit of playing around with it. 2560 x 1600 will always be neat to have for both work and games. they should definitely try to make more affordable classes of 2560x1600 monitors.
JFrameMan 4 weeks ago
lol dude u sucks on beta i got easy as sniper 50/7 xD
Melodicfuckingmetal 4 weeks ago
*looks out window at sky* Hey! Woah!
McBobghost 4 weeks ago
So he Spends thousands of dollars on his pc but he sucks at the game, This is most illogical.
TheGenesisfreak 1 month ago
@TheGenesisfreak What happend to the fun? you guys just want to be the best, dont think about the fun he is having
PepsiAlienX 4 weeks ago
@PepsiAlienX Well Actually I play my games to have fun, It's just most people who pay thousands of dollars on their computers are super hardcore only play to be good players
TheGenesisfreak 4 weeks ago
@TheGenesisfreak No we just want to stream HD 3D porn seamlessly without any lag
BoyzNAcne 4 weeks ago
looks better than reallife, lol.
Tehseusmt2 1 month ago
O;O
I'm desperate for a gpu like that I got a 550 ti
Aymdicate 1 month ago
learn to play before buy this kind of pc!
tmrulezful 1 month ago
Wait, wait. You say that you have a i7920 ? So it's running on tripple chanel? So how can you have 8gb ram? You can have 3x2gb or 3x4gb.
RacingRalphEVO 1 month ago
@RacingRalphEVO 4+2+2.
ssanei 1 month ago
@ssanei But i thougt that it doesn't work and all three have to be the same.
RacingRalphEVO 1 month ago
Fullscreen in 1080p, EPIC!!!
dino17011 1 month ago
Comment removed
USMCoo 1 month ago
nice pc but this was not battle field 3 this was where is the field 3 xD =D
ymsforever 1 month ago
Yeah I observed that on the new video cards and games over 30 fps is more than playable. The main thing is to be smooth, not to have high fps without being smooth.
teknown 1 month ago
im so jelly
mahin300 1 month ago
yeah yeah yeah...we get it *jealous*
ilsamiri7 1 month ago
hi steve austin lol
omg niceee
but tell me why you noob ? xDDD
mgoMrBoy 1 month ago
Reminds me of me when I started playing BETA lol! xD AAAHHH I DIED! xD :D :) ;)
QuibbyFailed 1 month ago
Comment removed
TheLudwig402 1 month ago
so full grown men do play games.....hmmmm
Aogle2 1 month ago
His screen is zoomed in
ultimateako96 1 month ago
poor gamer = amazing player. rich gamer = terrible gamer ^
JeremyRages 1 month ago 45
@JeremyRages Racist
bskdopeboy 1 month ago
@bskdopeboy how is that racist at all
JeremyRages 1 month ago
@JeremyRages Jobs tend to replace game practice time
Sandeemos 2 weeks ago
@JeremyRages that is 100% true.
TheThecooldude765 2 weeks ago
@JeremyRages normal gamer = normal player?
KirozzGaming 2 weeks ago
@JeremyRages That's because they're too busy staring at the amazing graphics rather than playing the game ;)
omg123596 2 weeks ago
@JeremyRages haha ,I agree with that.
ahmadmukhlis24 1 week ago
It requires DUAL 580's in SLI to max it out.. JESUS
AwesomeFace50 1 month ago
@AwesomeFace50 no it requires a single GTX 570 to max it out (dont have to sli) but if you need a cheap GPU that runs the game perfectly get the GTX 560 TI its only 250$ (500$-550$ in SLI)
1nbred 1 month ago
@1nbred Well to max it out 1080P and never under 60 fps
AwesomeFace50 1 month ago
@AwesomeFace50 No, it really doesn't. Nvidia said that because they wanted to sell more video cards.
rjc34 1 month ago
B.L.I.N.K
nickzoidthegamer 1 month ago
Oooohhhhh looks exactly the same as Xbox what's the fucking difference?!
MrNerdOfHalo 1 month ago
@MrNerdOfHalo hahahahhaahhahahahahahahahahaha b!tch please!
SamuraiM0 1 month ago
@MrNerdOfHalo If you actually have played bf3 on max settings on computer you'd see. Low on a good gaming computer is xbox quality.
JohnDeere75959 1 month ago
@MrNerdOfHalo 1) This was the beta; the release version looks another notch above. 2) The Xbox version only renders at 704p, while the PC version can, as this video shows, scale up to insane resolutions. 3) To get the PC version to look like the xbox version, one has to put everything to low, and put the resolution way down to 1280x720.
rjc34 1 month ago
@rjc34 Ok mate I didn't mean to have a go at PC but the days of the PC are very slowly but surely coming to an end. I don't mean that as an insult, Battlefield on the PC is probably one of the best games ever sold on the platform (extremely jealous that you can have 64 where as the Xbox only has 32).
MrNerdOfHalo 1 month ago
@MrNerdOfHalo PC games sales are up, and continuing to rise. People have predicted the fall of PC gaming for decades, but yet we still go strong. Games like BF3 are great because they give us a huge boost as console players realize how dumbed down the versions of the same game they're getting. Smaller maps, lower resolutions, less players. As long as there is an enthusiast market to spur on the march of computer power, there will be game makers to take advantage of it.
rjc34 1 month ago
Such a noob is trying to shoot friendly soldiers :D
glebecmd 1 month ago
is he playing on keyboard or gamepad like a controller???
mrkgarcia8 1 month ago
Can you write that sentence from here 4:07 its a bit fast :)
sgtyork85 1 month ago
bf3 doesn't use physx
n11lc2 1 month ago
hahaha i tink i played with you on that server
nVidiaGTX100 1 month ago
Ultra Settings ?
TheMacWhat 1 month ago
Screen-tearing as hell. Urk.
Baxtexx 1 month ago
@Baxtexx it the beta what do you expect
joeycool12 1 month ago
How come things on your HUD were cut off?
sebastiao2160 1 month ago 53
This has been flagged as spam show
@sebastiao2160 it the beta what do you expect
joeycool12 1 month ago
@sebastiao2160 cuz he is running a bigger resolution than the screen supports, or the scaling has failed.
Krelle1912 1 month ago
Comment removed
PcTwEekers 1 month ago
@sebastiao2160 he tells you at about 1:15
str8shot2020 1 month ago
@sebastiao2160 because its was beta
Ramdompcgamer 1 month ago
@sebastiao2160 lol he didn't set his display properly
fdsal0 1 month ago
@sebastiao2160 hardcore difficulty on
teknown 1 month ago
@sebastiao2160 cuz its beta
eBombzor 1 month ago
@sebastiao2160 it was probably his horizontal/vertical settings causing that
A10WarthogsAreSweet 1 month ago
That was painful to watch. XD
Duboraw 1 month ago 45
I feel there is a slight ghosting on rapid movement. Too much motion blur or is it the IPS panel?
DrKrFfXx000000000000 1 month ago
@DrKrFfXx000000000000 The default BF3 setting involve TONS of motion blur. He most likely didn't turn 'em down ;D
treboritram 1 month ago
watching in 360p doesnt do it justice
codbandito 1 month ago 2
@codbandito It has 1080p...
Davisrullzs 1 month ago
Dude your map ? its just a corner of it XD i would preffer to play in 1920x1080p :)
zanfromslovene 1 month ago
Does anyone know where I can find xbox/ps3 gameplay on this screen?
xxxKAIOHKENxxx 1 month ago
i agree 35 fps min in bf 3 is playable
hopihopijopi 1 month ago
I play standard HD with everything maxed out with a GTX 570. Hardly ever dip under 30 and average in high 30s low 40s.
parshnip1 1 month ago
i dont understand why when new consoles come out they already have outdated hardware
xkkiller117 1 month ago
Hay man in between 0:46 and 0:50 second whats that song that you use much appreciated if you can tell me thanks!
VladBoy7 1 month ago
oh shit its the guy that doesnt blink
Alcadeias2 1 month ago
Well this is the BETA, it`s a highly visible difference between this and original game. I have it on my PC and I run it at same resolution with 67 FPS on Ultra but I don`t like AA so I keep it off. My Asus Mars II handles this pretty well! But on my brother PC it runs way smoother and he`s got these: 2x GTX 590 SLI, AMD FX 8120 -3.4 MHz - O.C 5.23 GHz, 8 GB Ram. He`s got 120-160 FPS with all maxed out.
BlackClawReventoN 1 month ago 2
@BlackClawReventoN damn lol
XtasicRider 1 month ago
he isnt blinking at all o.O
Dan81369 1 month ago
This doesn't use PhysX, it's an AMD "gaming evolved" game.
ThisIsAGreatName 1 month ago
i bet your frame rates are lower on caspian border or any of the bigger maps
EyeMOweKay 1 month ago
how much did that all cost?
G4m3Inf3rno 1 month ago
How much did that PC cost?
evry1luvsboners 1 month ago
.... if you clic on esc and go to options - vidio you can change it from low - medium - high - ultra.... haha
pcgamingize 1 month ago
Looks good, although your not a very good player! :)
I also would have though that a single gtx580 would have a higer FPS rate actually.
TingSdeel 1 month ago
@TingSdeel maybe u use lower resolution
WaNFaHmi09 1 month ago
@WaNFaHmi09 i play @ 1920x1080 indeed, but having 110fps....
TingSdeel 1 month ago
@TingSdeel don't you read the title ??
WaNFaHmi09 1 month ago
i need help in bf3 =( all dc all the time when i tyr to play online
affe524 1 month ago
@affe524 Try disabling your firewall
jessekrynen 1 month ago
omg maximum power usage of this monitor is 250w (typical 110w),
almost as high as gtx 580 =D
TheCryallu 1 month ago
WOOOOOOOWW plz people stop with al those text!! omg bla bla bla...i have better this... you are slower that.... WHO CARES!! its just a nice video... so you only have to say: "nice video" (or something)....
thundertiger109 1 month ago
TheMightySinnerHD will be always right, PC graphics will always be better but rumored specs of the new Xbox are floating around and Microsoft didn't confirm it nor did they deny it.IF this was false they would be like "FUCK NO"but the new xbox is supposed to have 6 cores running at 4 GHz and 2or more gigs of ram and 2GPUs in sli mode and for a console thats insane and who knows what sony will do.
corvetteguy1994 1 month ago
@corvetteguy1994 The XBOX my friend does not use NVIDIA GPU's anymore, they stooped to AMD, can you for sure say they are planning to use the wonders of NVIDIA once more??
HairyDONG69 1 month ago
everyone can afforad wat u have 1000 processer 550 video card...........
ruzzgamer2011 1 month ago
Do they know who they just killed? he could REALLY mess with them in the end....
wenisinchina 1 month ago
Still not very impressive to me. Not for the price anyway... I would rather wait until games are more evolved in the graphic world..
Bamazrollin 1 month ago
you know we cant see that resolution if you upload it on 1080p , dont you?
bas12345654321 1 month ago
Hey Goldberg! I got a question for you, im getting a new gamer computer so is this a good one?
AXP 500W psp - Power Supply
Asus P8H61-M LE / socket 1155 / DDR3 - Motherboard
Intel® Core i5 2310 2,9 Ghz, 6MB - CPU
4GB DDR3 / 1333MHz / CL9 - Memory
ASUS GTX560 DCU PCI-E 1GB - Graphics card
PcGamerzChanel 1 month ago
@PcGamerzChanel yes that is a very good gaming pc. the only thing i would advise you to do is upgrade to a 650w power supply. also i would recommend you upgrade to 8gb of memory just to be on the safe side with games that will come out in the future. But other than those things this is a very good gaming rig.
BatDanz 1 month ago
@BatDanz Why should i updrage the power supply?? :O
PcGamerzChanel 1 month ago
@PcGamerzChanel so your bill isnt over 9000 lol
infamuzblayze 1 month ago
what do you guys think about the amd FX 6100 SIX CORE PROCESSOR? is it good for gaming?
napoletano52 1 month ago
@napoletano52 it is good yes, I have one and it performs very well, don't listen to people who say that the FX chips are bad. The AMD Phenom II X6's are still a little bit better for gaming with about a 5 FPS difference but the FX 6100 is a good proccessor overall.
BatDanz 1 month ago
@BatDanz i saw that the fx 6100 can be overclocked very well than the others six core processors, so it can perform better, what do you think?
napoletano52 1 month ago
@napoletano52 When its over clocked it does perform alot better that the Phenom II x6 1100t. And it does over clock very well, can easily be over clocked to 4.5 ghz without a very big temperature increase. I think if you over clocked it enough (maybe to 4.8) it would be an amazing processor with amazing performance.
BatDanz 1 month ago
@BatDanz what do you have now?
napoletano52 1 month ago
@napoletano52 My specs are:
CPU: AMD FX 6100 @ 4.2ghz
GPU: EVGA GTX 560ti OC
PSU: CiT 700w
HDD: 1tb western digital green
SSD: OCZ 120gb (for Boot)
BatDanz 1 month ago
I wonder how great it looks in paint!
MrHairspary 1 month ago
You look like the wrestler Goldberg :D
BigCrusher96 1 month ago
@CronosXIII I believe that's because minecraft is nearly entirely processed in the CPU.
chaztats 1 month ago
Y U NO Blink!
instenalable 1 month ago
R.I.P. headphone users.
sk851097 1 month ago
@sk851097 Why..?
JustKev699 1 month ago
I Want Run 60000fram per Second on this Game So I Hope Can Play PS4 and Xbox720 Future Graphics With DirectX 12 =)
FantasyNero 1 month ago
@FantasyNero ps4 will have decent graphics at the time. they have to make this system in under a certain price so pc gaming will always be better. Oh and don't expet 60k fps either lol..
Shotxofxvalor 1 month ago
@Shotxofxvalor I just Thinking about it my Friend , I know PC is the Best but When PS4 Released it will beat The PC games Graphics and about after 5 month PC Will be beat in The PS4 Graphics and Be Cleary Winner.!
FantasyNero 1 month ago
@FantasyNero I highly doubt that, PS4 or the new Xbox won't be able to beat PC graphics. With GPU's like GTX 580 or a GTX 590 and 2560x1600 resolution, consoles are atleast 5-6 years behind. The reason being TV's can only support up to 1920x1080 resolution. PC hardware releases almost every 6 months with better performance each time. Consoles are good for budget gaming, but not recommended for graphically intense gaming experience.
TheMightySinnerHD 1 month ago 61
@TheMightySinnerHD But you are Talking about Old Consoles 1080p it will be Gone and Come the Future im still waiting For The New Console and Future PC Gaming new Graphics.!
FantasyNero 1 month ago
@FantasyNero If you haven't noticed there are no TV's with a resolution of 2560x1600 resolution and will not be made atleast for another 5-6 years or more, even the next gen consoles will be stuck in the 1080p generation. As I've stated before Consoles are for budget gaming, or in other words gaming on the cheap and will not adapt to highly graphical gaming experience. Though Consoles can't and will never beat PC, they always deliver awesome exclusives and I'm sure they always will.
TheMightySinnerHD 1 month ago
@TheMightySinnerHD I didn't Mean Like that I mean Before when was 2005 PC Graphics vs Xbox360 , Xbox360 Beat PC Games Graphics not Graphics about 3D Cartoon Movie that what i meant Check Out 2005 Pc Games graphics not in 2006 PC is the Cleary is the Winner From all Console that about sure and About Next Gen On TV Will be Sure To PS4 and Xbox720 That Must Be in Future
FantasyNero 1 month ago
@TheMightySinnerHD We Can't see The PS3 Run 480p Like the PS2 they Change it to Next Gen 1080p they Will never be stuck because Sony if make Next Gen of Sony Console the PS4 it make sure make it with 2160p Or 4320p and I hope Too even Some of people said too Early it's every 6 years and We Reach 6 year Now to Last Nov.2012
FantasyNero 1 month ago