Those cars didnt deserved to die, they are classic, especially the Cadillacs
paulbusuego92 1 year ago
what a sad waste of nice future classics
chatrkat 2 years ago
THOSE were TOO OLD it had to be 1985 and newer dont worry!
hylander89 2 years ago
They are all too old gotta be 1985-2001
hanleyfallsmn56245 2 years ago
good point
nope I see em 2004 and I think that is the newest one it was a ford explorer
That is not cash for clunkers. If it where, I doubt they would be stacked so clean and be old 60s, 70s, 80s Caddys. They would be piled in a dump truck probably.
classicautofan1 2 years ago 3
No, it looks like someone's collection of Cadillacs. All of them are far too old to qualify for the CARS program.
Buick61 2 years ago 3
You're right. It does look like someone's Cadiallac collection.
TranCendenZ 2 years ago 2
i sure hope so~!
101xfmrogers 2 years ago
Those cars didnt deserved to die, they are classic, especially the Cadillacs
paulbusuego92 1 year ago
what a sad waste of nice future classics
chatrkat 2 years ago
THOSE were TOO OLD it had to be 1985 and newer dont worry!
hylander89 2 years ago
They are all too old gotta be 1985-2001
hanleyfallsmn56245 2 years ago
good point
chatrkat 2 years ago
nope I see em 2004 and I think that is the newest one it was a ford explorer
hylander89 2 years ago
That is not cash for clunkers. If it where, I doubt they would be stacked so clean and be old 60s, 70s, 80s Caddys. They would be piled in a dump truck probably.
classicautofan1 2 years ago 3
No, it looks like someone's collection of Cadillacs. All of them are far too old to qualify for the CARS program.
Buick61 2 years ago 3
You're right. It does look like someone's Cadiallac collection.
TranCendenZ 2 years ago 2
i sure hope so~!
101xfmrogers 2 years ago