Berkeley may not have argued well, but neither have you. it's your word against his word. go back to Descartes problem. How can I tell if I am not a brain in a vat, or attached to "The Matrix"? Maybe "God" is "The Architect" of "The Matrix"? I don't know if it is so, but I cannot (at least i don't know how to) tell the difference between "real" and "image / idea".
What came before his philosophy? Weren't they still persecuting rabbit-conjuring magic witches, or was that in Kant's time? This philosophy is old and useless, it's time for a new approach for a holistic philosophy- were old-school magic and new-world d/numbing down meet and work together to define our pathetic present and a ever-crumbling future! Kant, Berkeley, B. Russell, et.al. All naval-gazing silver-spooned hospital interns narrow-mindedly debating much ado about nothing!
@CanguroArgentino It all starts with Human Nature, as philosophy is a pursuit of the mind, religion of the soul, and every endeavor can be defined with its faults or endowments, like Hitler's vanity, Obama's greed, Cook's self-righteousness, Ghandi's selflessness, etc, etc. My main question to Philosophy: What part of the brain has state education dulled by filling the rest with so much crap, and Why?!
@CanguroArgentino And of vital interest are the files concerning population experimentation in WWII, which is still, to this date, deemed "too controversial" for the general public! Also, Vatican's hidden caves of valuable artifacts from Alexandria, and who's to say Atlantis, as well? It's up to Philosophy to JOIN THE DOTS!
Thanks for a lil mind flex! I guess I'd be a layman regarding philosophy. And had not heard of Berkley prior. But now I have I may look at what else I might find? From him as well as others... Cheers mate!!!
Well hooray! someone who thinks like I do, I am just over people telling me that something only exists in our perception and that objects dont exist until we give our attention to them. This is B.S.of course the objects exists - how would they ever draw up street maps for instance with landmarks, if they didn't. There would be total chaos on the streets, if we all relied on our perception to create something, we would be crashing cars having accidents, as we don't share the same perception. Gr8!
That hobbit you just called fat? He's skipping 2nd breakfast. The dwarf you called ugly? She spends hours every day braiding her beard so you can differentiate her from the males. See the Gollum creature with the large eyes and gangly arms? For 500 years the Ring poisoned his mind. That Elf you just made fun of for crying? He just lost his wizard friend to a Bal-rog. You never know what it's like to be bullied in Middle Earth until you walk a mile in their bare feet.
Immaterialism is like saying all is illusion. We need solid reality; as certainty is part of the material and concrete world we share. Otherwise we simply couldn't function - we need solidity and certainty from our world. Thank ` you . j
Yes, awesome vid, thanks! This is helpful in my studies, especially when you kind of explain all the concepts you're mentioning, like Descartes and whatever... but like, do that more! All you're talk of Kant and Locke left my head spinning and you should probably try to consolidate your rants about perception-existence inequalities before you start yelling about them. But that's coming from some Year 11 kid in Melbourne... I mean, I don't know if education is even your goal here -but it helps :D
I know this is stupid and everyone does this but here goes anyway. We are a new upcoming youtube channel from Australia and we would love for you to subscribe so if we get 500 subscribers by December Jack will dye his hair blue and you will all get to watch it. We're called the Frenchmen Platoon. I'm sorry if i've wasted your time but if possible thumbs this comment up so we can get out there, like you would if you started a new youtube channel :)
Berkeley should have spent more time perceiving himself and then accept that he in fact did not exist because it was only his perception...then take no actions to keep his ongoing perception of self alive because in the end he admitted that even he does not exist. or look at some teachings of G.I.Gurdjieff and see what he meant when he said that all these philosophical ramblings come to nothing more than discussing the qualities of apples.
@KRPTDxKWZS Solopsism is flawed in the fact that it is argued at all. If the only thing that exists is in your own mind, why bother talking to others about it.
there are these new vloggers named the frenchmen platoon go look em up because the sad thing is they are so funny but don't have any viewers. they only have one vid at the moment
@RyanTellUs I'm not sure if everyone has access to add shared annotations to their videos, because the feature was added at around the same time I got partnership status. As for, why are they appearing on this video, and not other videos? It's because I specifically enabled shared annotations on this video, free for anyone to comment on and/or "vandalise" as they see fit. Call it an ongoing sociological study of a specific youtube demographic.
@kungfucolin Oh I see, makes more sense now thanks for clarifying that was confused. At first I thought yo'd done it yourself. Well I dont believe your sociological study really needs to be ongoing, the evidence is overwhelming evidence. Idiots. Keep it up mate.
@kungfucolin . Get honest mate... You're "ChickoRollColin". Your philosophy? As mysterious as the ingredients of a chiko roll. Demographic study? Conclusion, most people have ditched this video within 15 seconds.... I type slow.
Furthermore, of all the videos I've made that I'd like to be in popular circulation, there are others I would choose ahead of this one, I can assure you.
@ChidAndBick If I were to guess, it would be because of a lack of other videos that share the same subcategories. Subcategories include but are not limited to: Australia, Philosophy, Education. Shared Annotations. If more people in this region made videos with the same subcategories, I would expect those to be in the same circulation.
Once again, these are only theories. Clearly the selection works on some algorithm, but who other than the coders knows what that expression actually looks like?
@kungfucolin It could be a positive feedback loop, in part fed by all the lamos writing primary school comments then telling their friends. From what I understand, google rank not only according to content but on popularity. Should be the same here.
Good video besides the graffiti. Philosophy is not at all irrelevant, as like you said it encourages critical thinking and sharpens your logic. Too bad for all those who missed that point
@arnygy Hey that's probably a pretty good point. My advice would probably be to check the wikipedia entry for Berkeley if you're interested in the guy himself, or check out Someone like John Locke to get a good idea of the popular philosophical paradigm, empiricism. Great background to this argument.
and you'll be paying off your uni debt debt with philosophy....or you can perceive it doesn't exist. some days you wish you chose a real career path hey?
@omnicronvegas Yes to both :) I think anyone taking themselves too seriously in philosophy should take a look at the annotations on this video hehe. It goes to show what a joke philosophy is in the eyes of many. It's more something to study because it interests you, and because it gives access to good generic critical thinking skills, but as for career, philosophy is generally reserved for career academics, or pot smokers. ^_^
Dear Philosophy 101: Berkeley's immaterialism Bones-underground is a 2d mmorpg. It is absolutely free to play indefinately. We offer a great community, a place where you can become rich and famous, or just hang out with a few friends. We have hundreds of weapons and armors to choose from. You may want to get a pet, or maybe do a little fishing and heaps more game play on my profile and link
Wish I had kept studying philosophy at Utas, it was a good course. There are some interesting counterarguments to Berkeley as well =) A good summary of it!!
i agree with u but perseption isnt relient on stimulus take for instance wen someone is stranded in a desert and they see a mirage of an oasis there is no actual oasis or "stimulus" but a perception is made. so basically im just pointing out that the existance of an apple is not necessary for the perception of an apple tho thats not to say that perception of an apple is necessary for the apples existance... im only 17 so if i just made an ass of my self please forgive me haha
Everyone is complaining about this video , if you don't like it , don't bother watching and commenting on it or adding stupid captions , there's people who actually like the video and want to watch it without immiture dumbass's recking it, i didn't like the video either but hey i'm not abusing this man with stupid captions or adding abusive comments
good reply - that your sorry - i get upset - a true smartarse? whats that mental health or aa throw of from a real apology -- dont write to me to put me down in a pretend apology - you are a low life and i hope karma affects you in this lifetime for the scum you are . always deflect everythign in your belief of superior philosophy... moron is a validation you dont deserve -
@daydreams4rock if you took a look at my page status, you may have noticed that I haven't been online for a week :) that being said, sorry that you get upset so easily.
what about your brain? Can I see it ,smell it ,feel it ? How do I know that you have one ? You dont have to experience these things to know it exists!
@ChristRegeneration it's pretty easy to prove whether or not people have objects we identify with as "brains" embedded in their skulls. they can be seen, smelled, and felt!
@tblaxxable What?! Haha Really?! you're "impressed"!? Hahaha You must get impressed easily, 1 spelling mistake which was so badly spelt it had to be corrected. Wow, That must of been the highlight of your day...
Of course a stonemason will make observations (based on undeniable, unchallenged, PROVEN and universal facts) compared to an average person. That's truth by demonstration, which exceeds philosophy...
@hypr0040 I think it's interesting where you use the word undeniable. Your argument here relies on an inferred conclusion that only these type of facts or observations (the stonemason example) are either worth your trouble noticing, or indeed are the only facts available to this kind of observation in the first place.
Forcing your audience to infer your conclusion is a poor form of argument.
The only other thing I see here is a blatant agreement with the characteristic of the stonemason.
great but Berkly's schematic philosophical notions seems and sound weird > obviously someone who didn't believe in Religion or a higher being than himself.
hi bro,kiwi livin in aussie here.i dont have much knowledge about who came up with what philosophy so thanks for the vid,although ill probably forget the guys name and just remember the theory,but thats my problem.what would you say is the difference between perception and experience?i think i would understand more clearly if i knew your definitions,hope you can answer for me.Thanks,Peaceout...
Colin, mate, I'm 40 and only now do I wish to become a man of words. I would love to comment on Berkeley's theories, but I as yet dont know anywhere near enough to open my mouth and make an ass out of my self LOL But I feel that if you define anything of a physical nature in absolute terms based purely on your perception of it, regardless of the sense used, then you fail to truly understand it because you perceive it through a "tunnel vision" state of mind. Bugger, wish I was smarter... in time
@kungfucolin thanks you for the vid, it is very informative. Do you take the existence of an eternal, omnipresent and omniscient spirit in Berkeleys' theory to be a necessary presmise or an obvious and only conclusion?
In a dream, there are no "real" scissors, yet I can have a perception which appears like scissors. It is simply an assumption to say there's "real" object beyond the perception.
Length,width, height, color... make no sense without a subject perceiving these properties... which is Berkeley's essential point and he's right... if there is something that is giving the perception of the scissors... this thing doesn't experiencable properties... it is kant's noumenon... it's unintelligible.
@otakurocklee Do you take the existence of an eternal, omnipresent and omniscient spirit in Berkeley's theory to be a necessary presmise or an obvious and only conclusion?
@Ioannisthegreat7 To me, Berkeley's great insight is that primary qualities (length, width, height etc.) are just as mind dependent as secondary qualities like color,taste and smell... Locke made this primary/secondary distinction which is false. I don't take the existence of god to be a necessary premise or conclusion of berkeley's philosophy. Just because the properties we perceive are mind-dependent, it doesn't follow that a supermind had to create them.
@otakurocklee cheers for the insight. But wouldn't berkeleys' world collapse into chaos and unpredictabiliy if there were no god in his arguement to sustain the world without common minds perceiving it now-there needs something to perceive reality at all times and places otherwise an object disappears once you stop perceiving it. What if a mind changed its belief, its perception? Without a supermind in his arguement wouldn't it follow that reality would change depending on independent minds ?
@Ioannisthegreat7 Yes, if we stick with Berkeley's idea that nothing can exist unless it is being perceived, then we need a supermind. I think he is right that the objects of our "experience" indeed don't exist unless we perceive them... But, there may be something that does not need to be perceived to exist, that is causing all our sense data... kant's thing-in-itself, or noumenon etc...
For Berkeley, god takes the role of the thing in itself, that causes the regularity of our experience...
@otakurocklee yes, that's what I meant- god in relation to berkeley not real life. Thanks a lot and there is one more thing. You talked about equivocation. I know what equivocation is but could you expand on that (equivocation) in relation to Berkeley beyond what was said in your vid cause I find it very interesting! Thanks again in advance!
@otakurocklee haha yes sorry for that, it's 2 in the morning in the UK and I m kinda tired :) But if you could expand on it (equivocation in berkeleys' arguement) it'd be great.
@Ioannisthegreat7 Well, kungfucolin's point is that the perception of an object is something different from the object itself. Say we look at some object holding it in front of us... then we look at it under water... it may look distorted underwater... ie: our perception of the object has changed, but the object itself hasn't. This is the "common-sense" viewpoint. So kungfucolin is saying that we have to separate the perception, from the object itself.
I personally disagree with this... practically it makes sense that certain perceptions of the object are "better" than others, so that we don't run into things etc... but in the common sense view... what we are referring to as the "object" is still a perception. Maybe we have bad eyesight... so we don't have a good perception of something... so we imagine the object itself, but what we're really doing is bringing in a different perception, that may be more practical.
@Ioannisthegreat7 regardless of how well our senses function. The qualities we're ascribing to the object are sensory-qualities... color, length,shape,size... they make no sense without reference to someone experiencing something.
So if there is something in and of itself independent of an experiencer, its qualities are not experienceable... its qualities can't be length,color,shape etc...
@otakurocklee@otakurocklee thanks for the explanation- I am currently reading a manual on the equivocation fallacy, yet it's too long and your explanation pretty much sums up what i have read so far. Thanks again
Watch a GIANT Monster Human walking in INDIA...you'll be surprised for SURE!...Just click on my id- "vikr195" to watch the video in my channel- "Vikas R. Channel"
WHY IS THIS STILL ON THE FUCKING HOMEPAGE!?!?!
nalyDmI 1 month ago
The annotations make this video epic.
MrCrowsoft 2 months ago
@MrCrowsoft I think they are pretty funny too :)
Many people have told me that I should block access and delete them, but why should I? haters gonna hate, eh?
kungfucolin 2 months ago
Berkeley may not have argued well, but neither have you. it's your word against his word. go back to Descartes problem. How can I tell if I am not a brain in a vat, or attached to "The Matrix"? Maybe "God" is "The Architect" of "The Matrix"? I don't know if it is so, but I cannot (at least i don't know how to) tell the difference between "real" and "image / idea".
Heissenburger 2 months ago
v v vSubscribe v v v
TylahHillMusic 2 months ago
<-- Subscribe !! :)
TylahHillMusic 2 months ago
Came for the philosophy, stayed for the annotations
AppiusOS 2 months ago
What came before his philosophy? Weren't they still persecuting rabbit-conjuring magic witches, or was that in Kant's time? This philosophy is old and useless, it's time for a new approach for a holistic philosophy- were old-school magic and new-world d/numbing down meet and work together to define our pathetic present and a ever-crumbling future! Kant, Berkeley, B. Russell, et.al. All naval-gazing silver-spooned hospital interns narrow-mindedly debating much ado about nothing!
CanguroArgentino 3 months ago
@CanguroArgentino It all starts with Human Nature, as philosophy is a pursuit of the mind, religion of the soul, and every endeavor can be defined with its faults or endowments, like Hitler's vanity, Obama's greed, Cook's self-righteousness, Ghandi's selflessness, etc, etc. My main question to Philosophy: What part of the brain has state education dulled by filling the rest with so much crap, and Why?!
CanguroArgentino 3 months ago
@CanguroArgentino And of vital interest are the files concerning population experimentation in WWII, which is still, to this date, deemed "too controversial" for the general public! Also, Vatican's hidden caves of valuable artifacts from Alexandria, and who's to say Atlantis, as well? It's up to Philosophy to JOIN THE DOTS!
CanguroArgentino 3 months ago
DO you mold your self after "Bobby" from Supernatural?
joecoolsthename 3 months ago
It"s actually spelled Berkeley but is pronounced with an A!
bikeboy656 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you liked this, you should hit up JAYE FRAN - CITY IN THE SKY. Do it now!
jayefran 3 months ago
thumbs up for cock CUNTS!
HyPeXNiinja 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everyone ! Watch this video to help support our cause
"Butterfly foundation Social Justice Pitch"
It is the first video :)
We have dedicated this video to our friend who has recently experienced a serious issue in todays society !
If you have a heart you will help .
kerriekaterina 3 months ago
Interesting!
Thanks for a lil mind flex! I guess I'd be a layman regarding philosophy. And had not heard of Berkley prior. But now I have I may look at what else I might find? From him as well as others... Cheers mate!!!
kewlkubes 3 months ago
Well hooray! someone who thinks like I do, I am just over people telling me that something only exists in our perception and that objects dont exist until we give our attention to them. This is B.S.of course the objects exists - how would they ever draw up street maps for instance with landmarks, if they didn't. There would be total chaos on the streets, if we all relied on our perception to create something, we would be crashing cars having accidents, as we don't share the same perception. Gr8!
reconnectwithme 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬.ılılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llılılı.▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
ＳＨＵＴ ＵＰ ＡＮＤ ＥＮＪ0:00Ｙ ＴＨＥ ＭＵＳＩＣ！
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬.ılılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llılılı.▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Theqwerty9988 3 months ago
That hobbit you just called fat? He's skipping 2nd breakfast. The dwarf you called ugly? She spends hours every day braiding her beard so you can differentiate her from the males. See the Gollum creature with the large eyes and gangly arms? For 500 years the Ring poisoned his mind. That Elf you just made fun of for crying? He just lost his wizard friend to a Bal-rog. You never know what it's like to be bullied in Middle Earth until you walk a mile in their bare feet.
rarekid740 4 months ago
شكرا لك
m6mp3 4 months ago
Immaterialism is like saying all is illusion. We need solid reality; as certainty is part of the material and concrete world we share. Otherwise we simply couldn't function - we need solidity and certainty from our world. Thank ` you . j
MrJamesdevereblest 4 months ago
wow you really are trying hard to be and sound intelligent...... but its really not working
gamelodge 5 months ago
Yes, awesome vid, thanks! This is helpful in my studies, especially when you kind of explain all the concepts you're mentioning, like Descartes and whatever... but like, do that more! All you're talk of Kant and Locke left my head spinning and you should probably try to consolidate your rants about perception-existence inequalities before you start yelling about them. But that's coming from some Year 11 kid in Melbourne... I mean, I don't know if education is even your goal here -but it helps :D
MrJaiLeeworthy 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Get the fuck off my home page.
elphillo1 5 months ago
don't give up yer day job hey!
AncestralReflections 5 months ago
>yawn<
AncestralReflections 5 months ago
great annotations.... lololol
AncestralReflections 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I know this is stupid and everyone does this but here goes anyway. We are a new upcoming youtube channel from Australia and we would love for you to subscribe so if we get 500 subscribers by December Jack will dye his hair blue and you will all get to watch it. We're called the Frenchmen Platoon. I'm sorry if i've wasted your time but if possible thumbs this comment up so we can get out there, like you would if you started a new youtube channel :)
TheFrenchmenPlatoon 5 months ago
Berkeley should have spent more time perceiving himself and then accept that he in fact did not exist because it was only his perception...then take no actions to keep his ongoing perception of self alive because in the end he admitted that even he does not exist. or look at some teachings of G.I.Gurdjieff and see what he meant when he said that all these philosophical ramblings come to nothing more than discussing the qualities of apples.
KRPTDxKWZS 5 months ago
@KRPTDxKWZS Solopsism is flawed in the fact that it is argued at all. If the only thing that exists is in your own mind, why bother talking to others about it.
dciple12 4 months ago
what a wast of time
maree0901 6 months ago
Win caption at 1:13
DeverSonic 6 months ago
Well done!! you put religion into the philosophical argument where it belongs
topgunexcel 6 months ago
wow the annotations are really annoying...
moyga 6 months ago
ugh speech bubbles all over - wtf - hacked or spammed, I dunno
AncestralReflections 6 months ago
@AncestralReflections no hacking involved. I added collaborative annotations because I was interested to see how people would use them.
The result was pure comedy. Who am I to deny people their fun?
kungfucolin 2 months ago
We are in the MATRIX.
emanon2noname 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THIS IS REALLY WEIRD. TYPE IN WE SHOULD SPOON IN THE SEARCH BOX
TheFrenchmenPlatoon 7 months ago
youtube.com/watch?v=zSj9zRZ3GGg
TheFrenchmenPlatoon 7 months ago
i love this guy
mauiwowie93 7 months ago
HAHAHAHAHHAH this guy is trippy as
EVERYBODY HAVE ABOUT 9 or 10 shots of jack daniels then watch this HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH
who the fuk can a river run with four legs
mauiwowie93 7 months ago
HAHAHAHAHHAH this guy is trippy as
EVERYBODY HAVE ABOUT 9 or 10 shots of jack daniels then watch this HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH
mauiwowie93 7 months ago
there are these new vloggers named the frenchmen platoon go look em up because the sad thing is they are so funny but don't have any viewers. they only have one vid at the moment
karanbilimoria96 7 months ago
Can i get a hi?
mrfgwankee 7 months ago
@mrfgwankee hi ^^
kungfucolin 2 months ago
I dont get why all of the speech bubbles are appearing?
RyanTellUs 7 months ago
@RyanTellUs I'm not sure if everyone has access to add shared annotations to their videos, because the feature was added at around the same time I got partnership status. As for, why are they appearing on this video, and not other videos? It's because I specifically enabled shared annotations on this video, free for anyone to comment on and/or "vandalise" as they see fit. Call it an ongoing sociological study of a specific youtube demographic.
kungfucolin 7 months ago 7
@kungfucolin Oh I see, makes more sense now thanks for clarifying that was confused. At first I thought yo'd done it yourself. Well I dont believe your sociological study really needs to be ongoing, the evidence is overwhelming evidence. Idiots. Keep it up mate.
RyanTellUs 7 months ago
@kungfucolin Hello kungfucolin, I was just wondering.. how do I add these annotations?
MotoFreestylePete 4 months ago
@kungfucolin . Get honest mate... You're "ChickoRollColin". Your philosophy? As mysterious as the ingredients of a chiko roll. Demographic study? Conclusion, most people have ditched this video within 15 seconds.... I type slow.
MrShabbyTiger 3 months ago
@kungfucolin How do u actually add annotations?
joecoolsthename 3 months ago
@joecoolsthename a quick google search will yield some results :)
kungfucolin 3 months ago
Furthermore, of all the videos I've made that I'd like to be in popular circulation, there are others I would choose ahead of this one, I can assure you.
kungfucolin 7 months ago
@ChidAndBick If I were to guess, it would be because of a lack of other videos that share the same subcategories. Subcategories include but are not limited to: Australia, Philosophy, Education. Shared Annotations. If more people in this region made videos with the same subcategories, I would expect those to be in the same circulation.
Once again, these are only theories. Clearly the selection works on some algorithm, but who other than the coders knows what that expression actually looks like?
kungfucolin 7 months ago 3
@kungfucolin It could be a positive feedback loop, in part fed by all the lamos writing primary school comments then telling their friends. From what I understand, google rank not only according to content but on popularity. Should be the same here.
Good video besides the graffiti. Philosophy is not at all irrelevant, as like you said it encourages critical thinking and sharpens your logic. Too bad for all those who missed that point
secondnatureaquarium 7 months ago
lol, is there some back ground knowledge or introduction to this topic, I have absolutely no idea what you're saying
arnygy 7 months ago
@arnygy Hey that's probably a pretty good point. My advice would probably be to check the wikipedia entry for Berkeley if you're interested in the guy himself, or check out Someone like John Locke to get a good idea of the popular philosophical paradigm, empiricism. Great background to this argument.
kungfucolin 7 months ago
gotta love the trolling
omnicronvegas 8 months ago
and you'll be paying off your uni debt debt with philosophy....or you can perceive it doesn't exist. some days you wish you chose a real career path hey?
omnicronvegas 8 months ago
@omnicronvegas u can turn philosophy into a different career such as writing or poetry cock head.
MutantSundew 8 months ago
@omnicronvegas Yes to both :) I think anyone taking themselves too seriously in philosophy should take a look at the annotations on this video hehe. It goes to show what a joke philosophy is in the eyes of many. It's more something to study because it interests you, and because it gives access to good generic critical thinking skills, but as for career, philosophy is generally reserved for career academics, or pot smokers. ^_^
kungfucolin 7 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear Philosophy 101: Berkeley's immaterialism Bones-underground is a 2d mmorpg. It is absolutely free to play indefinately. We offer a great community, a place where you can become rich and famous, or just hang out with a few friends. We have hundreds of weapons and armors to choose from. You may want to get a pet, or maybe do a little fishing and heaps more game play on my profile and link
boneug 8 months ago
Wish I had kept studying philosophy at Utas, it was a good course. There are some interesting counterarguments to Berkeley as well =) A good summary of it!!
cabejam16 8 months ago
wtf is this
nadineniyubahwe 8 months ago
gay as hell!
goodjob2day 8 months ago
I AM AN ASSASSIN BIATCH
IAMANASSASSINBIATCH 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
/user/notyouraveragecooker
Check out my channel for all uncut - real - cooked laughs
notyouraveragecooker 8 months ago
3:48 the answer is gravity lol
R0B0stairs 9 months ago
Covering a whole room in Post-it notes!!!
/watch?v=zt2UM5mcatE
ChinTuFatt 9 months ago
...zoginated
TwyfordianArc 9 months ago
REBECCA BLACK for 12 HOURS STRAIGHT!!!!
/watch?v=Hn71UwTI3Gg
ChinTuFatt 9 months ago
no philosophy cant over come sin only the death of jesus
swjpsalm9110 9 months ago
i m gonna subscribe you and then open the dictionary, and then talk to you later.
jaankhan23 9 months ago
i agree with u but perseption isnt relient on stimulus take for instance wen someone is stranded in a desert and they see a mirage of an oasis there is no actual oasis or "stimulus" but a perception is made. so basically im just pointing out that the existance of an apple is not necessary for the perception of an apple tho thats not to say that perception of an apple is necessary for the apples existance... im only 17 so if i just made an ass of my self please forgive me haha
SOG3000 9 months ago
@SOG3000 hehe, you haven't made an ass of yourself at all, but I consider you do a little research on the 'noumenon'.
Google it and see what you turn up.
kungfucolin 9 months ago
Charles Barkley was great at basketball though... check it...
watch?v=cpIggpXm1u8&feature=fvst
shades2 9 months ago
Awesome, thanks kungfucolin, keep it up!!
Sapote91 9 months ago
macquarie university?
LloydAus 10 months ago
@LloydAus Utas
kungfucolin 10 months ago
a few years ago did you do a video of you deleting your WoW account, if so i would like to let you know that it made me quit
child661 10 months ago
Whilst I'm not saying Berkeley is correct, your arguments for why he is wrong is somewhat problematic in and of itself.
marxvlog 10 months ago
His name is pronounced 'Barkeley'
Tweeter34 10 months ago
"I could have said more" Thank God you didn't.
Despite using moderately sophisticated words you failed to create a comprehensive and coherent argument. You were all over the place.
I think bogans should stick to drinking beers. And that hat is an epic fail.
WOGI5M 10 months ago
"I could have said more" Thank God you didn't.
I think bogans should stick to drinking beers. And that hat is an epic fail.
Despite using a moderately sophisticated words you failed to create a comprehensive and coherent argument.
WOGI5M 10 months ago
Very Interesting talk. Educational more than anything but interesting none the less. =)
whispersofnoone 10 months ago
Type MYPRIZE instead of YOU in youtube and hit enter
kerryn360 10 months ago
religion is illogical, occam's razor philosophy boy
jonnois 11 months ago 2
@jonnois Thanks for commenting without watching the video. a WIN for failing.
kungfucolin 11 months ago
@kungfucolin i did watch it, i was just commenting on the religeous part at the start
jonnois 11 months ago
@jonnois If I've misinterpreted you, I'm sorry - your comment doesn't give much information.
kungfucolin 11 months ago
Comment removed
jonnois 11 months ago
Everyone is complaining about this video , if you don't like it , don't bother watching and commenting on it or adding stupid captions , there's people who actually like the video and want to watch it without immiture dumbass's recking it, i didn't like the video either but hey i'm not abusing this man with stupid captions or adding abusive comments
dexbmx 11 months ago
Spent the whole video crossing those pop-ups
Mistersamsam 11 months ago
@Mistersamsam turn off the annotations.
firsporeva 11 months ago
2 years later and it's still here.
LlortnA 11 months ago
WHY IS THIS SHIT STILL ON THE FRONT PAGE?
JaddStar 11 months ago
good reply - that your sorry - i get upset - a true smartarse? whats that mental health or aa throw of from a real apology -- dont write to me to put me down in a pretend apology - you are a low life and i hope karma affects you in this lifetime for the scum you are . always deflect everythign in your belief of superior philosophy... moron is a validation you dont deserve -
daydreams4rock 11 months ago
wow you dont sub me after i write and favour you - dead beat colin - i have to say the added comments are correct - your a gay moron
daydreams4rock 11 months ago
@daydreams4rock if you took a look at my page status, you may have noticed that I haven't been online for a week :) that being said, sorry that you get upset so easily.
kungfucolin 11 months ago
Does anyone know why the heck this video (and a few others) show up so often on the youtube home page?
JeanLouie1106 1 year ago 13
@JeanLouie1106 I suspect it is related to a shortage of alternative videos in the specific field (Australia, Partner, Education.
kungfucolin 1 year ago
you guys are all ass holes this video is for people who give a shit..
so dont watch it if you dont care.. bunch of losers!
chuck18117 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this guy is fat.
ThebanPhalanx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i GET YA CHECK OUT SOME OF MY VIDS AND TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK
overthemountain67 1 year ago
what about your brain? Can I see it ,smell it ,feel it ? How do I know that you have one ? You dont have to experience these things to know it exists!
ChristRegeneration 1 year ago
@ChristRegeneration it's pretty easy to prove whether or not people have objects we identify with as "brains" embedded in their skulls. they can be seen, smelled, and felt!
kungfucolin 1 year ago
enough annotations there?
speedingcabbage 1 year ago
@speedingcabbage never enough! i left the annotation channel open specifically because i derive humour from the comments on the annotations.
kungfucolin 1 year ago
righto. top stuff
brigizord 1 year ago
What about the philosofy of we don't give a shit.
tblaxxable 1 year ago 17
@tblaxxable then why even watch this video?
firsporeva 11 months ago
@tblaxxable Its ''Philosophy'' not "Philosofy"
xXFind815Xx 10 months ago
@xXFind815Xx I take it that your spare time is used to troll youtube looking for spelling mistakes? Wow, I'm impressed.
tblaxxable 9 months ago
@tblaxxable What?! Haha Really?! you're "impressed"!? Hahaha You must get impressed easily, 1 spelling mistake which was so badly spelt it had to be corrected. Wow, That must of been the highlight of your day...
xXFind815Xx 9 months ago
@tblaxxable or the philosophy of spelling...
cabejam16 8 months ago
woteva
tblaxxable 8 months ago
@tblaxxable *whatever
cabejam16 8 months ago
@cptsupamang
seek medical assistance
emicaluzzi 1 year ago
Of course a stonemason will make observations (based on undeniable, unchallenged, PROVEN and universal facts) compared to an average person. That's truth by demonstration, which exceeds philosophy...
hypr0040 1 year ago
@hypr0040 I think it's interesting where you use the word undeniable. Your argument here relies on an inferred conclusion that only these type of facts or observations (the stonemason example) are either worth your trouble noticing, or indeed are the only facts available to this kind of observation in the first place.
Forcing your audience to infer your conclusion is a poor form of argument.
The only other thing I see here is a blatant agreement with the characteristic of the stonemason.
kungfucolin 1 year ago
"exceeds philosophy" indeed..
kungfucolin 1 year ago
great but Berkly's schematic philosophical notions seems and sound weird > obviously someone who didn't believe in Religion or a higher being than himself.
daak1234 1 year ago
Whats with the annotations?
iFrostyGFX 1 year ago
RETARD
alpha2470 1 year ago
Flagged
didierlassus 1 year ago
I saved 60% on stormproof holiday hair!
shlaxberg 1 year ago
lol, this vid is too funny;)
NewYorkHoliday 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
go to your address bar, type "gift" before youtube and then press enter!
GraFiKed 1 year ago
hi bro,kiwi livin in aussie here.i dont have much knowledge about who came up with what philosophy so thanks for the vid,although ill probably forget the guys name and just remember the theory,but thats my problem.what would you say is the difference between perception and experience?i think i would understand more clearly if i knew your definitions,hope you can answer for me.Thanks,Peaceout...
rider5000G 1 year ago
HAHAHA i cant pay attention to what hes saying if i watch the vid cause of all the text bubbles
Streety101101 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Guys type in "gift" before youtube then press enter
vinmitc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Guys type in "gift" before youtube then press enter
vinmitc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Guys type in "gift" before youtube then press enter"
cc6726able 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Guys type in "gift" before youtube then press enter
acedkilla 1 year ago
era yous motha fuka's, yous are problay worse den him, he a good proud Aussie there giving the best he could, but its insane wit da shit all ova it,
RMaudhoppy 1 year ago
@RMaudhoppy ARAB !!!!!
just saying :P
basslinet 1 year ago
good on ya mate.
please pay attention to a very good book called:
DRG-DRSYA-VIVEKA (the seer and the seen)
its not a philosophy book its an inquiry
mzaloni5 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Type in "gift" before youtube in address bar then press enter
stephineej 1 year ago
perception strain theroy is sociology
jayguy173 1 year ago
you look like a retard, but you actually pretty clever. hmm
Phantom2232 1 year ago
@Phantom2232 This comment made me laugh ^^
kungfucolin 2 months ago
lol
themazterzz 1 year ago
Hey man, I enjoyed the info brother.
GTStaab 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Go to your address bar, after the word YOU and before the word TUBE, type in "win" then press enter
SiniRIPMisko 1 year ago
interesting...
kodiak369 1 year ago
I think more university lecturers should do (at their discretion).
EAFSQ9 1 year ago
Comment removed
bigchoonage 1 year ago 37
@bigchoonage i know right.. don't ask me why, lol.
kungfucolin 1 year ago
Hi, at my school formal I was awarded "Mr. Philosophy" :)
paulthehanna 1 year ago
Colin, mate, I'm 40 and only now do I wish to become a man of words. I would love to comment on Berkeley's theories, but I as yet dont know anywhere near enough to open my mouth and make an ass out of my self LOL But I feel that if you define anything of a physical nature in absolute terms based purely on your perception of it, regardless of the sense used, then you fail to truly understand it because you perceive it through a "tunnel vision" state of mind. Bugger, wish I was smarter... in time
spawn70470 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Go to your address bar, after the word YOU and before the word TUBE, type in "win" then press enter
J0rDaN2340 1 year ago
Type between win and tube in url
Cheeseit05 1 year ago
are you aussie? you should do this same thing with arthur schopenhaur
demonsigotsome 1 year ago
@kungfucolin thanks you for the vid, it is very informative. Do you take the existence of an eternal, omnipresent and omniscient spirit in Berkeleys' theory to be a necessary presmise or an obvious and only conclusion?
Ioannisthegreat7 1 year ago
@Ioannisthegreat7 and why?
Ioannisthegreat7 1 year ago
I love philosophy. Immaterialism sounds like solipsism.
l1is1the1coolest 1 year ago
Ayeeee Col - howzit goin mate.
hotandspicy666 1 year ago
In a dream, there are no "real" scissors, yet I can have a perception which appears like scissors. It is simply an assumption to say there's "real" object beyond the perception.
Length,width, height, color... make no sense without a subject perceiving these properties... which is Berkeley's essential point and he's right... if there is something that is giving the perception of the scissors... this thing doesn't experiencable properties... it is kant's noumenon... it's unintelligible.
otakurocklee 1 year ago
@otakurocklee Do you take the existence of an eternal, omnipresent and omniscient spirit in Berkeley's theory to be a necessary presmise or an obvious and only conclusion?
Ioannisthegreat7 1 year ago
@Ioannisthegreat7 To me, Berkeley's great insight is that primary qualities (length, width, height etc.) are just as mind dependent as secondary qualities like color,taste and smell... Locke made this primary/secondary distinction which is false. I don't take the existence of god to be a necessary premise or conclusion of berkeley's philosophy. Just because the properties we perceive are mind-dependent, it doesn't follow that a supermind had to create them.
otakurocklee 1 year ago
@otakurocklee cheers for the insight. But wouldn't berkeleys' world collapse into chaos and unpredictabiliy if there were no god in his arguement to sustain the world without common minds perceiving it now-there needs something to perceive reality at all times and places otherwise an object disappears once you stop perceiving it. What if a mind changed its belief, its perception? Without a supermind in his arguement wouldn't it follow that reality would change depending on independent minds ?
Ioannisthegreat7 1 year ago
@Ioannisthegreat7 Yes, if we stick with Berkeley's idea that nothing can exist unless it is being perceived, then we need a supermind. I think he is right that the objects of our "experience" indeed don't exist unless we perceive them... But, there may be something that does not need to be perceived to exist, that is causing all our sense data... kant's thing-in-itself, or noumenon etc...
For Berkeley, god takes the role of the thing in itself, that causes the regularity of our experience...
otakurocklee 1 year ago
@otakurocklee yes, that's what I meant- god in relation to berkeley not real life. Thanks a lot and there is one more thing. You talked about equivocation. I know what equivocation is but could you expand on that (equivocation) in relation to Berkeley beyond what was said in your vid cause I find it very interesting! Thanks again in advance!
Ioannisthegreat7 1 year ago
@Ioannisthegreat7 hi loannisthegreat7. I think you're mixing me up with kungfucolin. :)
otakurocklee 1 year ago
@otakurocklee haha yes sorry for that, it's 2 in the morning in the UK and I m kinda tired :) But if you could expand on it (equivocation in berkeleys' arguement) it'd be great.
Ioannisthegreat7 1 year ago
@Ioannisthegreat7 Well, kungfucolin's point is that the perception of an object is something different from the object itself. Say we look at some object holding it in front of us... then we look at it under water... it may look distorted underwater... ie: our perception of the object has changed, but the object itself hasn't. This is the "common-sense" viewpoint. So kungfucolin is saying that we have to separate the perception, from the object itself.
otakurocklee 1 year ago
@Ioannisthegreat7
I personally disagree with this... practically it makes sense that certain perceptions of the object are "better" than others, so that we don't run into things etc... but in the common sense view... what we are referring to as the "object" is still a perception. Maybe we have bad eyesight... so we don't have a good perception of something... so we imagine the object itself, but what we're really doing is bringing in a different perception, that may be more practical.
otakurocklee 1 year ago
@Ioannisthegreat7 regardless of how well our senses function. The qualities we're ascribing to the object are sensory-qualities... color, length,shape,size... they make no sense without reference to someone experiencing something.
So if there is something in and of itself independent of an experiencer, its qualities are not experienceable... its qualities can't be length,color,shape etc...
otakurocklee 1 year ago
@otakurocklee @otakurocklee thanks for the explanation- I am currently reading a manual on the equivocation fallacy, yet it's too long and your explanation pretty much sums up what i have read so far. Thanks again
Ioannisthegreat7 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch a GIANT Monster Human walking in INDIA...you'll be surprised for SURE!...Just click on my id- "vikr195" to watch the video in my channel- "Vikas R. Channel"
vikr195 1 year ago