One must have natural gifts. I work alone but as part of a vast international atheist conspiracy to destroy Orthodoxy and Confessional Lutheranism. We burn icons whenever possible.
Religion is ludicrous. You and the Catholics and the Orthodox are arguing over who has the better outfits for your Barbie dolls and the better invisible friend. Plus you're too fat. Try fasting.
@Paleolutheran nobody ever pointed at me at the beach or pool and laughed for being sanctimonious. If you have the same invisible friend, why the arguments? It's been 2000 years; shouldn't you have this stuff down pat by now? From the outside looking in, it looks stupid.
Why do you touch your man boobs and head like that before you talk? Are you trying to pretend that you're Catholic or Orthodox? Is this the latest pseudo-medieval revival/reintroduction among Lutherans? Another gimmick like Ablaze?
@Paleolutheran do you also smite, slay and crush any peasants who rebel against their overlords? Or force Jews to work at manual labor "by the sweat of their noses" and take away their "desperate, lying Talmud and other foul works from the Devil"? Cause Luther was big on those, too.
@Paleolutheran do you also smite, slay and crush any peasants who rebel against their overlords? Or force Jews to work at manual labor "by the sweat of their noses" and take away their "desperate, lying Talmud and other foul works from the Devil"? Cause Luther was big on those, too. But then, the Russians and Ukrainians and Romanians and Belarusians will all have their own anti-Semitic stories to tell you now that you're hanging out with them.
dakotagerman1 is a boy who says he hates Lutherans But I say he in actuality loves Lutherans and all he wants is for someone out there to reach out to him. At that time he will have a shoulder to cry on and say "eeem I'm sssorry guys please don't hate me." All he really wants is to be loved but we all have to break down his candy shell. He knows deep down Lutherans are awesome... all along. Just needs a hug.
@dakotagerman1 Dude, way to troll a decent channel. I would ask you what denomination you are in however it is clear you attend the first united church of butthurt. This is a good video.
@dakotagerman1 Ah ha. Your statement was cute. STEP 1: change your tampon STEP 2: count to ten STEP 3: enjoy a beer Step 4: read Luther's Small Catechism STEP 5: change tampon again (heavy flow day) STEP 6: ???? STEP 7: profit
Hmmm. Your depiction of Mary as immaculated or purified, and of being assumed bodily into heaven, and of being the mother of the Church, strikes a strange chord. Paul writes that Jesus was "born of a woman." He calls Mary nothing more than a woman, for Christ, in His human nature, was fully a man. He was made like unto us, His brethren, and our mothers received no special purification. The divine attributes of Christ come from the Holy Ghost. Keep Mary a woman and Jesus fully man and fully God.
@Gleaningz I keep Mary fully woman...and that means she was born with original sin...something which ultimately kills and is passed onto her offspring. If she isn't purified, Jesus is a sinner because He gets His humanity from her...just saying.
@Paleolutheran No need to purify Mary other than with sprinkling of blood of Christ. Placenta is formed with embryo from egg & sperm. Placental barrier limits what is passed from mother to child. Blood does not...child has its own blood. It may be said in relation to the placenta that Mary's womb was sanctified by the Holy Ghost, Who controlled placenta. I've wondered if God didn't create man this way because He knew His Son would be born of a woman. God's works are marvelous.
@Gleaningz She was still mortal...we inherit mortality from Adam...Christ was sinless, but would have inherited it had she not been purified by the Holy Spirit at the Annunciation. If He does not assume Adam's blood...then how is Adam redeemed?
@Paleolutheran I have 485 characters to write a book on how Christ assumed human nature :-) The power of the Most High, Who is the Creator of Adam, overshadowed Mary and caused her to conceive. Upon conception Jesus had His own human blood. How? The power of the Most High must have supplied this, for a child does not receive blood from their mother. Jesus is begotten of God, born of a woman. This leads to another 'how', which leads me to a wow, and I leave it in the realm of faith.
@maikel8765 Okay I'm sorry but i don't know what your talking about because i commented on this video 6 months ago. I'm a Lutheran myself if that helps?
OK I'm not attacking you, but answer this, without god, what is the point of living? Also there is scientific evidence that Jesus did exist. Please, I don't mean to offend but please answer my question. god is not the merciless, destructive person that medieval people thought he was. He is all loving.
Wow...and yet again, you obviously have problems with Orthodox Jews, not Christians. It would help to read the Bible and/or commentaries on the OT laws before you make a statement like you do. I can recommend several good ones if you wish. Seriously, way to confuse a law given to ancient Israel and apply it to persons in the New Covenant. I'm shocked at your research ability. What website are you using which gave you information not fit to be printed on toilet paper?
I'm "peddling?" So you regard teaching children ideas which are cultural as child abuse? The minority groups must love you :-). The phrase you're looking for is "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones." Again...stop just asserting stuff...either produce evidence, argue a point, or shut up. Besides...."500 year old disgruntled monk?" How about "hi, I'm Evolved Skeptic, and I'm peddling a 150 year old incestuous guy's scientific theory which was used to justify Eugenics and the holoc."
1. Yeah, I speak like a Midwesterner...are you a rascist (joke :-D).
2. Technically, Hume is Scottish, and Sir Sean Connery would be offended for you to suggest that he is British :-).
3. I'm not attacking Hume...I'm saying that his view of skepticism (which is respectable) disrupts science as you understand it, because he doubts science ACCORDING TO EMPRICAL METHODS.
4. My video isn't a diatribe..it's an introduction to the Small Catechism...which wasn't dealing with atheism..numbnuts.
What in the heck are you talking about? I have a degree in philosophy pal! Are you saying that atheists are always consistent? You seemed to assert that Luther was fool and was contradictory...so maybe you want to apply some LOGIC to your own argument.
Seriously dude, take a chill pill, relax, then go back and review basic logic...your use of it is terrible, and your rhetoric is too sharp to have wit, so go back and review that to.
You can review both by reading Aristotle's books by the same name...oh wait, he was a theist....dang, I guess he was a moron to. I'm sorry, but modern atheists fail to impress me. If you want a GOOD atheist to read, try Hume, then realize that his arguments for skepticism destroy the ability of science to operate (and did so for almost 100 years), then come back to me and tell me why I should worry about your misquoting of Luther or bare assertions of biblical contradictions.
So what you're saying is you can't contextualize comments? Wow, you're helping yourself look like a fool. Have fun in academia trying to argue that way.
Luthyerans don't believe in Luther ? Then what exactly is your belief? St James clearly says faith without works is DEAD. Meaning one's faith must be supported by acts of love, etc, to show that clearly. You can't say you love GOD if you hate Catholics and find fault with all they say. Of course, not all popes are perfect. But neither was Luther. He hated Jews and wanted to burn their synagogues. He ALSO said 'that Revelations was NOT inspired by the Holy Spirit ! He was wrong! !
Martin Luther threw out several books of the Bible that contradicted his theory - justification by faith alone, including ST James' Epistle which says faith without deeds is DEAD. He also hated Jews, besides the Catholic Church. This hate towards Jews was used by none other than Adolf Hitler to JUSTIFY the extermination of the Jewish race in WW2... Both Luther and Hitler have a lot to answer to God. The Catholic Church has links dating back to Christ and St Peter,, who apptd our first pope .
Luther did not deny the book of James a place in the New Testament canon. From his first translation of the New Testament to the last work he did on Bible translation, shortly before his death, he included it. He simply did not count it among the "chief books." Thus, he treated it in the way many theologians before and after him did, as "deuterocanonical." That is, he assigned it secondary ranking in the Bible.
The main reason for his attitude towards the book of James is how it was misused by roman catholics to defend their workrighteous doctrine. In a similair way, some ancient fathers were sceptic against the book of revelation, because some sects misused that book to defend their false doctrines. I'm a lutheran and i have no problem with the book of james, nor the book of revelation btw.
Lutherans don't believe in Luther. Thus, there are no reason to defend every single sentence Luther said or wrote. Luther is not our pope. I am a lutheran, but i dont believe in Luther or his words. I agree with him because he just like me, put his trust in Gods Word alone, and disputed and rejected the doctrines of men. That is what Jesus Christ did too.
Concerning having "links back to Christ and St Peter". I find the early church fathers very good, and i agree with what they wrote, for example the apostolic fathers (90-150 AD). That was before the roman catholic church developed their false doctrines concerning mary, purgatory, work righteousness, power of the pope etc. The roman catholic church is not the orginal church, but the result of a unscriptural developement within christianity that Luther och others exposed very well.
I think after some years of having his blood called for, he was potentially approaching extreme senility....and you can find worse writings by others in that time if you look hard enough ;-). After all, in 1492 when Columbus sailed the ocean blue, I recall something called the Spanish Inquisition...aimed at Jews and Muslims.
After having spent 4 years in a LCMS seminary and 12 years in LCMC churches I came to one conclusion. Most Lutherans don't know what they teach and confess. Of those who know what they teach and confess very few care to practice it. Conservative Lutherans are now looking to Evangelicals for their answers when they should be looking to Luther instead. Most pastors just want to keep their "benefits" while most parishoners don't want any new converts join. Peace be with you.
Most Christians don't know what they "teach and confess." "Faith is not for the clever." We should not look to Luther or the Evangelicals. We should look to Christ. Luther would agree. Pax.
More "Evangelical" than Lutheran, I would guess... true Lutheranism is defined by a very clear and set doctrine. Ever heard of the Book of Concord? It's a collection of the Lutheran doctrine and beliefs, defined very, very clearly. It's not a "free belief" denomination at all.
I am ELCA. I can tell you that we do not believe in the "freedom of man," but the "bondage of the will" as do all Lutherans. We strive to uphold the God intended liberty of humankind which we are called to foster and defend.
Wow! All of the responses to comments are posting as new comments at the top of the forum as if I were commenting on the video. That makes this forum make no sense. Sorry! paleoLutheran- none of these comments were intended for you. Gliches, Gliches...Technology sucks sometimes, huh?
i just see on the sign- kingston apostolic lutheran church- there is a town near by- cokato that has one as well- not sure if it originated there? i think minneapolis has a few of them- i think they have a website.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Luther was a crazy monk that started his own religion and he change the bible end of story. From Luther we have 50,000 different religions but only one True Church of our lord Savior Jesus Christ. THE HOLY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
Luther did not start a religion. He wanted to correct the Catholic in its teachings. That Tetzel was pushing. Jesus never said anything about "indulgences" for a way into heaven.
NixonisLord is ubiquitous...everywhere I go, there he is trolling. :-D
AnHonestChristian 4 months ago
One must have natural gifts. I work alone but as part of a vast international atheist conspiracy to destroy Orthodoxy and Confessional Lutheranism. We burn icons whenever possible.
NixonisLord 6 months ago
@NixonisLord Ah....the truth comes out! I must have you know I piss on Darwin's grave! Haven't gotten arrested...yet.
Paleolutheran 6 months ago
Professional mischief maker. And how many other people are doing this with you?
NixonisLord 6 months ago
@NixonisLord Does this pay well? I'm a student, so quite a few :-D
Paleolutheran 6 months ago
Religion is ludicrous. You and the Catholics and the Orthodox are arguing over who has the better outfits for your Barbie dolls and the better invisible friend. Plus you're too fat. Try fasting.
NixonisLord 6 months ago
@NixonisLord I will say for the sake of argument that we have the same invisible friend...and no one beats the Calvinist's kickass facial hair.
I know I'm fat...you're sanctimonious :-D
Paleolutheran 6 months ago
@Paleolutheran nobody ever pointed at me at the beach or pool and laughed for being sanctimonious. If you have the same invisible friend, why the arguments? It's been 2000 years; shouldn't you have this stuff down pat by now? From the outside looking in, it looks stupid.
NixonisLord 6 months ago
@NixonisLord Well I'm pointing at you and calling you sanctimonious. According to your profile you're over 50...what is your profession?
Paleolutheran 6 months ago
Why do you touch your man boobs and head like that before you talk? Are you trying to pretend that you're Catholic or Orthodox? Is this the latest pseudo-medieval revival/reintroduction among Lutherans? Another gimmick like Ablaze?
NixonisLord 1 year ago
@NixonisLord I am actually Eastern Orthodox now, but then I did what Luther said in the Small Catechism...and also...I love my manboobs :-P
Paleolutheran 1 year ago
@Paleolutheran do you also smite, slay and crush any peasants who rebel against their overlords? Or force Jews to work at manual labor "by the sweat of their noses" and take away their "desperate, lying Talmud and other foul works from the Devil"? Cause Luther was big on those, too.
NixonisLord 11 months ago
@Paleolutheran do you also smite, slay and crush any peasants who rebel against their overlords? Or force Jews to work at manual labor "by the sweat of their noses" and take away their "desperate, lying Talmud and other foul works from the Devil"? Cause Luther was big on those, too. But then, the Russians and Ukrainians and Romanians and Belarusians will all have their own anti-Semitic stories to tell you now that you're hanging out with them.
NixonisLord 11 months ago
@NixonisLord Yes! And what's awesome is that just like you, Hitler could spell, thus making all words evil. Way to ad hominem dude.
Paleolutheran 11 months ago
dakotagerman1 is a boy who says he hates Lutherans But I say he in actuality loves Lutherans and all he wants is for someone out there to reach out to him. At that time he will have a shoulder to cry on and say "eeem I'm sssorry guys please don't hate me." All he really wants is to be loved but we all have to break down his candy shell. He knows deep down Lutherans are awesome... all along. Just needs a hug.
jave042 1 year ago
Lutheran pricks up the ass! I hate all you fucking asshole Lutherans: whether ELCA or Missouri Synod!!
dakotagerman1 1 year ago
@dakotagerman1 Thanks dude...I love you to :-D
Paleolutheran 1 year ago
@dakotagerman1 Dude, way to troll a decent channel. I would ask you what denomination you are in however it is clear you attend the first united church of butthurt. This is a good video.
jave042 1 year ago
@jave042
Fucking asshole Lutheran.
Piece-of-shit Martin Lutheran was a drunkard and a murderer.
dakotagerman1 1 year ago
@dakotagerman1 Ah ha. Your statement was cute. STEP 1: change your tampon STEP 2: count to ten STEP 3: enjoy a beer Step 4: read Luther's Small Catechism STEP 5: change tampon again (heavy flow day) STEP 6: ???? STEP 7: profit
jave042 1 year ago
@dakotagerman1
What an intelligent thing to say and way to say it...
ChristianEastern 1 year ago
Hmmm. Your depiction of Mary as immaculated or purified, and of being assumed bodily into heaven, and of being the mother of the Church, strikes a strange chord. Paul writes that Jesus was "born of a woman." He calls Mary nothing more than a woman, for Christ, in His human nature, was fully a man. He was made like unto us, His brethren, and our mothers received no special purification. The divine attributes of Christ come from the Holy Ghost. Keep Mary a woman and Jesus fully man and fully God.
Gleaningz 1 year ago
@Gleaningz I keep Mary fully woman...and that means she was born with original sin...something which ultimately kills and is passed onto her offspring. If she isn't purified, Jesus is a sinner because He gets His humanity from her...just saying.
Paleolutheran 1 year ago
@Paleolutheran No need to purify Mary other than with sprinkling of blood of Christ. Placenta is formed with embryo from egg & sperm. Placental barrier limits what is passed from mother to child. Blood does not...child has its own blood. It may be said in relation to the placenta that Mary's womb was sanctified by the Holy Ghost, Who controlled placenta. I've wondered if God didn't create man this way because He knew His Son would be born of a woman. God's works are marvelous.
Gleaningz 1 year ago
@Gleaningz She was still mortal...we inherit mortality from Adam...Christ was sinless, but would have inherited it had she not been purified by the Holy Spirit at the Annunciation. If He does not assume Adam's blood...then how is Adam redeemed?
Paleolutheran 1 year ago
@Paleolutheran I have 485 characters to write a book on how Christ assumed human nature :-) The power of the Most High, Who is the Creator of Adam, overshadowed Mary and caused her to conceive. Upon conception Jesus had His own human blood. How? The power of the Most High must have supplied this, for a child does not receive blood from their mother. Jesus is begotten of God, born of a woman. This leads to another 'how', which leads me to a wow, and I leave it in the realm of faith.
Gleaningz 1 year ago
@maikel8765 Okay I'm sorry but i don't know what your talking about because i commented on this video 6 months ago. I'm a Lutheran myself if that helps?
vikingcrest12 1 year ago
OK I'm not attacking you, but answer this, without god, what is the point of living? Also there is scientific evidence that Jesus did exist. Please, I don't mean to offend but please answer my question. god is not the merciless, destructive person that medieval people thought he was. He is all loving.
vikingcrest12 2 years ago
Are you asking me or Evolved Skeptic?
Paleolutheran 2 years ago
evolved skeptic
vikingcrest12 2 years ago
Wow...and yet again, you obviously have problems with Orthodox Jews, not Christians. It would help to read the Bible and/or commentaries on the OT laws before you make a statement like you do. I can recommend several good ones if you wish. Seriously, way to confuse a law given to ancient Israel and apply it to persons in the New Covenant. I'm shocked at your research ability. What website are you using which gave you information not fit to be printed on toilet paper?
Paleolutheran 2 years ago
I'm "peddling?" So you regard teaching children ideas which are cultural as child abuse? The minority groups must love you :-). The phrase you're looking for is "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones." Again...stop just asserting stuff...either produce evidence, argue a point, or shut up. Besides...."500 year old disgruntled monk?" How about "hi, I'm Evolved Skeptic, and I'm peddling a 150 year old incestuous guy's scientific theory which was used to justify Eugenics and the holoc."
Paleolutheran 2 years ago
You're as, if not more, annoying than the fundies.
Paleolutheran 2 years ago
1. Yeah, I speak like a Midwesterner...are you a rascist (joke :-D).
2. Technically, Hume is Scottish, and Sir Sean Connery would be offended for you to suggest that he is British :-).
3. I'm not attacking Hume...I'm saying that his view of skepticism (which is respectable) disrupts science as you understand it, because he doubts science ACCORDING TO EMPRICAL METHODS.
4. My video isn't a diatribe..it's an introduction to the Small Catechism...which wasn't dealing with atheism..numbnuts.
Paleolutheran 2 years ago
What in the heck are you talking about? I have a degree in philosophy pal! Are you saying that atheists are always consistent? You seemed to assert that Luther was fool and was contradictory...so maybe you want to apply some LOGIC to your own argument.
Seriously dude, take a chill pill, relax, then go back and review basic logic...your use of it is terrible, and your rhetoric is too sharp to have wit, so go back and review that to.
Paleolutheran 2 years ago
You can review both by reading Aristotle's books by the same name...oh wait, he was a theist....dang, I guess he was a moron to. I'm sorry, but modern atheists fail to impress me. If you want a GOOD atheist to read, try Hume, then realize that his arguments for skepticism destroy the ability of science to operate (and did so for almost 100 years), then come back to me and tell me why I should worry about your misquoting of Luther or bare assertions of biblical contradictions.
Paleolutheran 2 years ago
So what you're saying is you can't contextualize comments? Wow, you're helping yourself look like a fool. Have fun in academia trying to argue that way.
Paleolutheran 2 years ago
He also called reason "God's greatest gift"...maybe context rather than quotes is what you are looking for.
Paleolutheran 2 years ago
"Doctor" James White is an idiot.
TheTerribleSwede 3 years ago
Luthyerans don't believe in Luther ? Then what exactly is your belief? St James clearly says faith without works is DEAD. Meaning one's faith must be supported by acts of love, etc, to show that clearly. You can't say you love GOD if you hate Catholics and find fault with all they say. Of course, not all popes are perfect. But neither was Luther. He hated Jews and wanted to burn their synagogues. He ALSO said 'that Revelations was NOT inspired by the Holy Spirit ! He was wrong! !
TroyeHaryanto 3 years ago 2
Martin Luther threw out several books of the Bible that contradicted his theory - justification by faith alone, including ST James' Epistle which says faith without deeds is DEAD. He also hated Jews, besides the Catholic Church. This hate towards Jews was used by none other than Adolf Hitler to JUSTIFY the extermination of the Jewish race in WW2... Both Luther and Hitler have a lot to answer to God. The Catholic Church has links dating back to Christ and St Peter,, who apptd our first pope .
TroyeHaryanto 3 years ago 2
Luther did not deny the book of James a place in the New Testament canon. From his first translation of the New Testament to the last work he did on Bible translation, shortly before his death, he included it. He simply did not count it among the "chief books." Thus, he treated it in the way many theologians before and after him did, as "deuterocanonical." That is, he assigned it secondary ranking in the Bible.
internetsurfer777 3 years ago
This sounds like a very positive interpretation of him saying that the book of James ought to be "thrown into the river".
BlackCappa 2 years ago
The main reason for his attitude towards the book of James is how it was misused by roman catholics to defend their workrighteous doctrine. In a similair way, some ancient fathers were sceptic against the book of revelation, because some sects misused that book to defend their false doctrines. I'm a lutheran and i have no problem with the book of james, nor the book of revelation btw.
internetsurfer777 3 years ago
You should know our theology before you speak against it.
Luther created a novelty which as such cannot be reconciled with orthodox Christianity.
BlackCappa 2 years ago
Lutherans don't believe in Luther. Thus, there are no reason to defend every single sentence Luther said or wrote. Luther is not our pope. I am a lutheran, but i dont believe in Luther or his words. I agree with him because he just like me, put his trust in Gods Word alone, and disputed and rejected the doctrines of men. That is what Jesus Christ did too.
internetsurfer777 3 years ago
Concerning having "links back to Christ and St Peter". I find the early church fathers very good, and i agree with what they wrote, for example the apostolic fathers (90-150 AD). That was before the roman catholic church developed their false doctrines concerning mary, purgatory, work righteousness, power of the pope etc. The roman catholic church is not the orginal church, but the result of a unscriptural developement within christianity that Luther och others exposed very well.
internetsurfer777 3 years ago
Interesting video. However, I am confused as to your beliefs on the Virgin Mary.
bobbyke31 3 years ago
What are your thoughts on Luther's "On the Jews & Their Lies"?
piefrance 3 years ago
I think after some years of having his blood called for, he was potentially approaching extreme senility....and you can find worse writings by others in that time if you look hard enough ;-). After all, in 1492 when Columbus sailed the ocean blue, I recall something called the Spanish Inquisition...aimed at Jews and Muslims.
Paleolutheran 3 years ago
I wasn't questioning his character in relation to others; anti-semitism isn't relative in my mind.
piefrance 3 years ago
Which is why we don't accept everything he said. He was indeed a child of his time.
Paleolutheran 3 years ago
...and yet, Prof. Pelikan converted to Eastern Orthodoxy.
zarnoffa 3 years ago
After having spent 4 years in a LCMS seminary and 12 years in LCMC churches I came to one conclusion. Most Lutherans don't know what they teach and confess. Of those who know what they teach and confess very few care to practice it. Conservative Lutherans are now looking to Evangelicals for their answers when they should be looking to Luther instead. Most pastors just want to keep their "benefits" while most parishoners don't want any new converts join. Peace be with you.
Celestiaetterra 3 years ago
Most Christians don't know what they "teach and confess." "Faith is not for the clever." We should not look to Luther or the Evangelicals. We should look to Christ. Luther would agree. Pax.
Norskyone 3 years ago
I am Evangelical Lutheran and our believes are extremly free and we believe in the freedom of man and word.
RazielDArc 3 years ago
More "Evangelical" than Lutheran, I would guess... true Lutheranism is defined by a very clear and set doctrine. Ever heard of the Book of Concord? It's a collection of the Lutheran doctrine and beliefs, defined very, very clearly. It's not a "free belief" denomination at all.
pauljmccain 3 years ago
Isn't the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland pretty liberal? I heard that they have women pastors and homosexual blessings. Is that true?
HailZeon57 3 years ago
I am ELCA. I can tell you that we do not believe in the "freedom of man," but the "bondage of the will" as do all Lutherans. We strive to uphold the God intended liberty of humankind which we are called to foster and defend.
Norskyone 3 years ago
Wow! All of the responses to comments are posting as new comments at the top of the forum as if I were commenting on the video. That makes this forum make no sense. Sorry! paleoLutheran- none of these comments were intended for you. Gliches, Gliches...Technology sucks sometimes, huh?
Norskyone 3 years ago
i just see on the sign- kingston apostolic lutheran church- there is a town near by- cokato that has one as well- not sure if it originated there? i think minneapolis has a few of them- i think they have a website.
cmacattack34 3 years ago
20 miles from here kingston,mn has the apostolic lutheran church.
cmacattack34 3 years ago
Thanks...I've never heard of the apostolic lutheran church...do they show themselves as ALC?
Paleolutheran 3 years ago
very interesting! so which synod do you belong to? WELS? LCMS? ELCA? CLC? ELS? LAESTADIAN? APOSTOLIC? THANK YOU.
cmacattack34 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Luther was a crazy monk that started his own religion and he change the bible end of story. From Luther we have 50,000 different religions but only one True Church of our lord Savior Jesus Christ. THE HOLY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH!!!!!!!!!!!!
rickker20 3 years ago
Luther did not start a religion. He wanted to correct the Catholic in its teachings. That Tetzel was pushing. Jesus never said anything about "indulgences" for a way into heaven.
atexn4christ 3 years ago
"He wanted to correct the Catholic in its teachings."
Like all other heretics and schismatics before and after him.
BlackCappa 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lutheran church is not Apostolic you broke the line when you broke from the Catholic Church.
rickker20 3 years ago
I'm WELS, the best Lutheran synod out there! (not to brag, of course)
HailZeon57 3 years ago
The Lord be with you!
chretiendutroyes 4 years ago 2
and with your spirit.
Paleolutheran 4 years ago