Added: 1 year ago
From: SuperMicroguy
Views: 12,364
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is very clear & well presented. But it does overlook key points. First, by reversing polarity (which does require tri state logic) you could actually drive 18 LEDs in the first example. Second, you don't have to drive only one LED at a time. An entire row or column can be lit at once allowing for a higher duty cycle. Third, multiplexing "Isolates" the LEDs, meaning that (unlike in chrlplxng) different number of LEDs can be at each "Junction" or even different components, motor, buzzer etc.

  • I can really follow you very well on this video. You should become a teacher!

    I am looking forward to see more videos in the future.

    Many thanks for the video Jon!

  • Nice video John.Many thanks.

  • Perhaps when you say "two diodes in series" you mean other diodes in the matrix. Because an LED conducts current in only one direction, no "sneak paths" exist. If you used small incandescent bulbs, current could go through sneak paths and cause lamps other than the one "selected" to light, at least partially. --Jon

  • But there is a mistake! There are 2 diodes in seriel to an other. If you work with LED's , one is "full" on an two are are "half" on! Please look at the plan....

  • Excelente, ¡Gracias!

  • i have seen a lot of demonstrations about multiplexing but this video helps me to understand that... thanks

  • I thought the current flows from -(minus) to +(plus).

  • Electrons flow from minus to positive, but years ago people involved with electrical equipment decided that current would be defined as flowing from the higher potential (positive) to the lower potential (minus). --Jon

  • @SuperMicroguy In school we used Conventional Current flow and Electron flow..

    Most circuits are drawn using Conventional Current flow from positive to negative, the idea which started by Benjamin Franklin.

    Once Electron flow was understood, They did not change electronic notation because it was already standard to draw the current flow from Positive to Negative. And easier to understand that you have a Positive(More) to Negative(Less) vs. trying to get the idea of true current flow.

  • that's a lot of help :)

  • nice info

  • great video

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more