Germany carried the last hopes of the free world into Operation Barbarossa since the over-sized USSR could have never been defeated in a defensive war. The Germans were forced to act to defeat the jewish plan to Bolshevize the world. Had the offensive been announced then Stalin would have stacked all of his front lines with Christian peasants. The strategy of Hitler always aimed to preserve as many lives as possible while Stalin always aimed to throw away as many lives as possible.
if he would had the new class of subs released earlier he woulda wom the atlantic and there for fuck canda and britain both but he fucked up and stalled
Had he stuck to his original plan he would have conquered Russia. His original plan called for an outright drive towards Moscow, bypassing all the surrounding cities and towns. Once captured by the fall, the plan called for fortifying in Moscow, and regrouping until the following spring where they would make their final drive to the Vulga River and finish the war.
Hitler was worried about leaving the cities on the way to Moscow uncaptured, and altered the plan. Napoleon's failings scared him.
exactly but Hitler was bold yet timid. His timidness cost him the war. Dunkirk was a good example of his timidness, and later int he Eastern front he had many timid moments.
1. England had an alliance treaty/agreement with Polland so they had to join when Germany invaded.
2. America joined because Japan attacked them and they were Germany's allies, so also had no choice but to join the defence against Germany and Japan. It was just the way it went that Russia was at war with Germany also at that time so became the west's allies by default.
With respect I think you should get your facts right before you comment. The European Union was established in 1993 and it only even originated from the European Coal and Steel Community formed in 1951 and the Treaty of Rome in 1957.
Look, It's a clip about the "Operation Barbarossa" ... The germans attacked Russia... In the backgroud you can hear... Ludwig van Beethoven "Symphony No. 9" "Ode to Joy" and that is the anthem of the Council of Europe and the European Union, promoted as a symbol for the whole of Europe as are the other European symbols.
So when I see that... it's like you play "The Star-Spangled Banner" to a Holocaust video.
Yes I did know what music was being played as I was the one who put it there. Germany attacked Russia - correct me if Im wrong but Beethoven was German. So pre-tell, how can your point of it being the "Council of Europe and the EU anthem" be an arguement if: A)Beethoven died in 1827 B)Op Barbarossa was conducted in 1941 C)EU was formed in 1993. If they chose Ode to Joy as thier anthem its up to them. But Ode to Joy has no direct connection or loyality to the EU at all.
No no no Mr. MacZoolander don't change the topic now!!!
Thats BS you talk about!!!
And I'm not going to argue with a kid like you. It is weird! plus you show Hitler and his Operation to attack Russia as something joyful, and that's weird!
You can't expect ppl would get what you mean if you don't say what you mean!
It doesnt matter what perspective you have on it..it was a joyful thing. And its not weird, it is just a perspective. I dont know what kind of country you live in my friend, but where I live its called freedom of opinion.
P.S.
If I didnt expect people to understand what I mean, then I would be stooping to thier level of intelligence and it should be the contrary. The more ambiguous and thought provoking the better. And that is why I thank you for your oposition to my movie...God speed.
Op Barbossa was what the world wanted. They wanted to see the 2 evil world powers destroy oneanother. And if Op Barbossa didn't happen, a couple months later Russia would attack.
I made this clip for a presentation I gave on Operation Barbarossa. I just couldnt bring myself to delete it after I spent a while making it (Im not that computer savy).
Germany carried the last hopes of the free world into Operation Barbarossa since the over-sized USSR could have never been defeated in a defensive war. The Germans were forced to act to defeat the jewish plan to Bolshevize the world. Had the offensive been announced then Stalin would have stacked all of his front lines with Christian peasants. The strategy of Hitler always aimed to preserve as many lives as possible while Stalin always aimed to throw away as many lives as possible.
TradeRoutes 2 years ago
woooooot! HITLER!! hes awsome!
niksarmy2 2 years ago
if he would had the new class of subs released earlier he woulda wom the atlantic and there for fuck canda and britain both but he fucked up and stalled
persainpwner 2 years ago
Hitler's armed forces where tactically superior but strategically doomed - from the start. The same forces are at work today in the Muslim world.
mder681 2 years ago
Had he stuck to his original plan he would have conquered Russia. His original plan called for an outright drive towards Moscow, bypassing all the surrounding cities and towns. Once captured by the fall, the plan called for fortifying in Moscow, and regrouping until the following spring where they would make their final drive to the Vulga River and finish the war.
Hitler was worried about leaving the cities on the way to Moscow uncaptured, and altered the plan. Napoleon's failings scared him.
CaseRed0605 2 years ago
Don´t invade russia in autumn/winter xD
Hinni1309 2 years ago 4
What did we learn? Don't invade Russia. :D
T800System 2 years ago
thank god the bastard failed.
aswar314 2 years ago
white power!
dinodog1234 2 years ago
Hitler should have not spared Britain.
if he had not spared them in Dunkerque He would have won.
and now also Britain would be much stronger and still would have a commercial empire instead of being the american butler
rambo753 2 years ago 2
exactly but Hitler was bold yet timid. His timidness cost him the war. Dunkirk was a good example of his timidness, and later int he Eastern front he had many timid moments.
jeffman3003 2 years ago
britsh have have teeth
iIIegal 3 years ago
alot of people have teeth
Mitch1990africa 2 years ago
The allies was on russians side. That was the problem in WW II.
They should had kept themselve out of the war. England and usa had nothing to do with the Germans war against France, poland and Russia.
England and usa just made everything worse...
Illo22 3 years ago 5
1. England had an alliance treaty/agreement with Polland so they had to join when Germany invaded.
2. America joined because Japan attacked them and they were Germany's allies, so also had no choice but to join the defence against Germany and Japan. It was just the way it went that Russia was at war with Germany also at that time so became the west's allies by default.
Thuph6hi 3 years ago
i dont know about you guys but i was pretty happy when germany invaded russia
who needs them communist pigs
weitiff 3 years ago 2
good comment guy!
fraulens 3 years ago
Вы невежественны и идиот weitiff & fraulens
DougBond 3 years ago
write in english please!
fraulens 3 years ago
how sad
DougBond 3 years ago
It's a bit pervert to play the European Union Anthem...
Gornn 3 years ago
With respect I think you should get your facts right before you comment. The European Union was established in 1993 and it only even originated from the European Coal and Steel Community formed in 1951 and the Treaty of Rome in 1957.
Thuph6hi 3 years ago
Look, It's a clip about the "Operation Barbarossa" ... The germans attacked Russia... In the backgroud you can hear... Ludwig van Beethoven "Symphony No. 9" "Ode to Joy" and that is the anthem of the Council of Europe and the European Union, promoted as a symbol for the whole of Europe as are the other European symbols.
So when I see that... it's like you play "The Star-Spangled Banner" to a Holocaust video.
But that's just what I think... soo...
whatever...
P.S.: Think about the lyrics.
Gornn 3 years ago
Yes I did know what music was being played as I was the one who put it there. Germany attacked Russia - correct me if Im wrong but Beethoven was German. So pre-tell, how can your point of it being the "Council of Europe and the EU anthem" be an arguement if: A)Beethoven died in 1827 B)Op Barbarossa was conducted in 1941 C)EU was formed in 1993. If they chose Ode to Joy as thier anthem its up to them. But Ode to Joy has no direct connection or loyality to the EU at all.
Thuph6hi 3 years ago
okay... lol you don't understand me.
1# It's the European Anthem
2# It's an ode to JOY !!! "so the lyrics"
3# You see Hiter
4# Germany attacked Russia
Now THINK!
and,
It's the song man, JOOOOYYYYY !!!!! hello... wake up.
Millions of ppl died and you play a JOY ode to it... and you keep asking "whats wrong about it"
Greeting from GERMANY!
Gornn 3 years ago
First of all, I do understand you.
If anything it is a little ironic rather than pervet that I play it in the background.
And as for the lyrics...Op Barbarossa was the beginning of the end of Nazi Germany and Hilter. So they are singing "JOY!" Hitler is going to die.
So "whats wrong about it".
Ode to Joy = Artistic freedom
Kia Ora.
Thuph6hi 3 years ago
No no no Mr. MacZoolander don't change the topic now!!!
Thats BS you talk about!!!
And I'm not going to argue with a kid like you. It is weird! plus you show Hitler and his Operation to attack Russia as something joyful, and that's weird!
You can't expect ppl would get what you mean if you don't say what you mean!
Gornn 3 years ago
It doesnt matter what perspective you have on it..it was a joyful thing. And its not weird, it is just a perspective. I dont know what kind of country you live in my friend, but where I live its called freedom of opinion.
P.S.
If I didnt expect people to understand what I mean, then I would be stooping to thier level of intelligence and it should be the contrary. The more ambiguous and thought provoking the better. And that is why I thank you for your oposition to my movie...God speed.
Thuph6hi 3 years ago
.... lol... whatever.
Gornn 3 years ago
Op Barbossa was what the world wanted. They wanted to see the 2 evil world powers destroy oneanother. And if Op Barbossa didn't happen, a couple months later Russia would attack.
ponchoyo 3 years ago
ROCKETS WHERE NOT IN 41
Nicl1230 4 years ago
Of course they were. They are called MBRLs (Multi Barrel Rocket Launchers), the Russians used them. Clown.
Thuph6hi 4 years ago
For to be the first your video
isn't evil
Niesus 4 years ago
lmao
isoldmygirlfriend 4 years ago
I made this clip for a presentation I gave on Operation Barbarossa. I just couldnt bring myself to delete it after I spent a while making it (Im not that computer savy).
Thuph6hi 4 years ago