Added: 2 years ago
From: zeno464
Views: 1,108
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • In the Bible, they're referred to as "boys" or "youths." Since a man became such at the age of thirteen, then these were prepubescent kids. And, no, it doesn't say they "ate" them:

    Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys.

    But, hey, a good mauling isn't that bad, right?

  • Hm? God sent two she-bears to "eat" 42 "little children"? I can't find a single translation that talks about the bears eating them, never mind that the 42 of them, by common sense, couldn't have been "little children". Oy vey.

  • i was speaking to my dad about this, and he started saying "even though it says children, it was more probably mature young men"...and i was dumbfounded....he was missing the point entirely! like it makes one iota of difference what age they were. really frustrates me.

  • @StephenKuma It was just though

  • Epaminodas:

    Thanks for the kind comment on my video. 2 Kings 2:23-34 strikes me as one of the strangest passages in all the Bible. I couldn't resist making a video about it.

  • classic take!! lol

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more