Added: 3 years ago
From: theDaftman
Views: 87,733
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (126)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I should also point out the amount of losses I can see and hear is amazing! Vibration, sound, friction, I2R, and all the magnetic losses!

  • Thats a huge heatsink near the motor controller. How much power does it dissipate as heat?

  • the problems your room temperature, its not -273'c

  • sounds like a v8 XD

  • Daft, please ignore the Sheeple, they do not have a mind of their own they let Exxon and Mobile do their thinking for them.

    

  • Has any of these negative people, heard of the bloom box? It defy s your so called Laws. Does it work? I believe you can get that answer from Walmart,Google,and others who bought and are now using the bloom. Google bloom and you will be silenced! Ask your self why? can't you use this in cars that run NG the MPG would be amazing and the carbon foot print would be greatly reduced. Zero

    Then look up Stanley Meyer, and then learn what happens to you if anger the energy gods AKA OIL Co's

  • skip 2:18 to runnig

  • The man is a great mind. To think of this is to walk a new path. Men have been killed for less. Good luck and god speed bro. When you get this right I want the chance to buy the first one. What are the applications? What is the emp cap out put. What is the input requirements and how can the average joe schmoe like me help to improve this?

  • What a nice garbage collection.

  • This is very odd. Why would we want to use more power to create less? Im all for the concept of free energy, but current physics prohibit it. it takes energy to make energy. Move next to a waterfall and u will have free energy with a wheel. xD

  • Si quereis colaborar dando a conocer la ENERGIA LIBRE la mejor manera de hacerlo es hacer publicidad. Cuanta mas gente lo conozca mas avanzaremos. COLABORA!!

    Busca en google ENERGIA LIBRE SIN CENSURA y hazte ya con la camisetas Free Energy. Gracias a ella, podras conocer gente que tambien sepa de energia libre, asi como informar a los que te pregunten sobre ella. El futuro de la Energia libre esta en tus manos!!!! ENERGIA LIBRE SIN CENSURA

  • what if for the input you used solar power then it could be self powering so it could be infinet

  • So if the motor spins at 10,000 rpms and the size of magnets are measured at 15,000 and so u use more to create less! If motor spins at 5000rpm and a pulley can spin up the shaft to 15000! That's less energy to draw and more output! Gas powered gen speed up as the draw increases, again u increase the speed back up to 10k it's spinning the magnets at 20k rpm that may help, hell what do I know?

  • Well just a quick theory! Ok here goes most generators/ alternators have a set speed in which they create the most power, over speed past that point does nothing more then the threshold! So a fast motor driving pulleys of different sizes increases the speed/decreases the speed! Drag is met with a smaller pulley to reduce the total output while larger puts less strain on usage but for same speed!

  • Hey Daftman dude!

    Wicked!

    More balancing!Stronger frame.

    Keep it up!!!

    Ignore the negative comments!!!

  • you guys are just fucking cruel leave the guy alone! at least he is using his mind and inspiring others to do so aswell

  • Yeah it's a fancy and inefficient transformer. It's converting voltage to EMF to voltage and to try to convert it to EMF to create a loop costs to much current and so the motor stalls once removed from the power supply. You better off cooling a 1:1 transformer down to as close to absolute zero as possible and hooking the primary to the secondary and sparking it with the power supply. The electricity will jump back and forth for quite a while.

  • What's the torque of this machine in ft-lbs?

  • Daft, you should learn physics and math so you can form a sound theory prior to experimentation.

  • Not to sound like a closed-minded douche, but of course this won't work. It is just simple physics.

  • some people just dont know how to use calculator

  • Ok, what did I miss.

    The input is about 12.5 volts and 3.2 amps which is 40 watts.

    the output is about 30 volts and .1 amp which is 3 watts

    Its using over ten times the amount of power its putting out, what a waste!!!!

  • @mattg889 Think of it as interest =)

    wasting energy is "capital".

    and renewable. optimistic about the future =)

  • @gudik lol, If that is what you would like to think...

  • @mattg889 output is 30 watts...

  • @Lumin3k No, i had it right.... 30 volts multiplied by .1 amp is 3 watts. (note the period before the 1)

  • Comment removed

  • You can't get something for nothing. There is no such thing as a "perpetual motor."

  • Comment removed

  • hey! theDaftman, you are awesome I am impressed so I don't hesitate to subscribe

  • put a fan blade on the end!!!

  • This thing looks like a little version of what they used in Black Mesa, so be careful ;)

  • @clorky2 lol is that from the half life game ? :P

  • It s like the voltmeter cannot handle the voltage, you should try placing a voltage devider. It runs awesome congrats !

  • It s like the voltmeter cannot handle the voltage, you should try placing a voltage devider.

  • it sounds sinister

  • So, you're basically using 36+ watts of energy to run a motor (no laminated iron stator/s) to run a generator (also no laminated iron stator) to get a whopping 6 watts of electricity? And the explanation is "That the generator *does* produce enough energy to run the motor/s, but you have not figured out why it does not work, yet".

    What? Wait a minute, aren't you short about 30 watts, just for unity?

  • the electrons are alredy in the wire. we just change the work it does to somthing that serve us. whats you observe in a volt amp meter is not work. its only the change in work.

  • as far as i can see, all you are doing is converting flow (Amps) into Pressure (volts), it will never run itself unless you either bring the current requirement via the motors down, or you manage to increase the current output , unfortunately, as you have just proven again, you didnt create "over-unity" you just changed/transferred energy to a different type

  • @bloodreighn volt isn´t pressure. voltage measure change in electric resistance. amps is just a larger volt load. you can have a light bulb powered at zero volts and 250 ma 60 watts. there is no such thing as volt or amps its just a way to describe different relationships of change in electric resistance. how much how fast or slow. when you power a load there is no volt in it there is only amps. the slower the change the higher the amps the faster the change the lesser the amps. no volts.

  • @coldarc What a Daft Statement, go re-visit Ohms Law v=i X r , without voltage it is impossible to submit ANY current or find ANY resistance, and it IS pressure, you can have ALL the voltage/pressure in the world with the least amount of current/Flow but you can not have current with NO pressure/Voltage!

  • @bloodreighn your problem is that you dont understand that A=i x r to. induction is only the change in potentials difference in electric resistance. when you measure volt on an amp load in paralell you measure the remaining change in differential and not eny voltage in the load. you dont find eny resistance you only measure differentials between many potentials. volt is a small current. if you measure volt across a 600 watts power source in 60000000v and 0.01ma you get very little volts.

  • @bloodreighn of course you measure amps as A = I divided with R but the consequence is the same just different methods to derive values from the amount of change in electric resistance across a differential in potential or a changeing potential difference in amplitude. a candle has a lot of potential energy but unless we find an efficient way to change thousands of tiny varying and changeing potentials into once coherent change in amplitude there would be very little usable energy in it.

  • @coldarc Yep.. Keep going on.. I still Go with my original statements, oh and.. Try measuring your voltages properly, you just seam to be digging yourself a hole of numbers and equations that simply don't work.

  • @bloodreighn now your thinking like a machine. i discovered that everything around us resonate at a frequency and that what we think is going on doesnt always work in the real world. your numbers doesnt always add up to the real thing. you dont turn on a light bulb because it was never of in the first place. when a light bulb is on its only in a different state of of flux like a quantum computer the 1 and 0 is two different states of on.

  • @bloodreighn if you chould describe electricity without the concepts of particles you will get the right idea.

    for me most people are backward thinking people. energy can exist in form called mass. if you begin with energy as force times distance makeing up directions of space as waves, particles exist secondary. the particles didnt make up the waves, the waves makes up particles. particles are wave functions. you have to get rid of the idea that waves is a product of particles.

  • @bloodreighn heat is not vibrations of atoms or molecules or both. heat is random fluctuation, constantainly changeing variables. low temperatures gives of lower frequencies like infrared and below. how these fluctuations change also change the electric resistance in a conductor. if both poles on a battery has same electric resistance there is no net force, there is no exess electrons to share.

  • why not add motors to the ends to collect energy? A decent motor does not need high rpm.

  • Very good working concept for magnetic drive to create a workable force, have you tried with a generator that produces more amps, rather than volts, volts are good, but they make power inverters to 120 & 240 V off a 12V system, try a 12V generator that produces the requires 3amps to run the thing and set it in motion, apply recirculated power, then cut the input and see if she'll play ball... not an electrical engineer by any means and not trying to knock your work i think it is n great concept

  • Very good working concept for magnetic drive to create a workable force, have you tried with a generator that produces more amps, rather than volts, volts are good, but they make power inverters to 120 & 240 V off a 12V system, try a 12V generator that produces the requires 3amps to run the thing and set it in motion, apply recirculated power, then cut the input and see if she'll play ball... not an electrical engineer by any means and not trying to knock your work i think it is an great concept

  • Consider the vibration as kinetic energy waste. Perhaps an array of tuning wands at the same resonance as the vibration emissions to convert to an ambient voltage to subsidize your loss in amperage. Sound and vibration are never accounted for and are containable. Love love. and good luck!

  • Around 40 watts in and around 15 watts out. Around 37% efficiency.

  • WOW

    

  • sounds like a lycoming

  • Very nice workmanship. I enjoyed the video.

  • you should've built a HUGE one... instead of 4 small ones.

  • i have a way for you to eliminate the friction which causes the loss in r.p.m. cauesd by VIBRATION .... listen to it man thats loud !!! i have a way to surpress all i have just mentioned ..... interested ? i.m. me

  • You do a very good job at soldering and managing all the cables, it looks very neat ! For the newman motor, I have little believe it works.

  • The only thing needed is a frictionless shaft bearing... with a balanced flywheel at one end. The long shaft will be making vibrations affecting the over-all efficiency of this demonstration. A rubber flywheel at one end and some sort of metal surface enhancer to be applied to the liner of your shaft bearings will definitely eliminate most of the vibrations/ noise and increase your rpm.

    But I think you have an AWESOME project. Kudos!

    By the way, up to how much KVA can this small thing make?

  • I am currently using your diagram for a newman motor bedini circuit with reed switch. The question is what would I modify to run the newman on strictly the bedini circuit and leave out the reed switch? Any info would be greatly appreciated! THANKS .... scooterscottii

  • THE electrons should have NO VELOCITY in terms of CURRENT + or - I in a PERFECT WORLD

    the CEMF and EMF will cancel each other out at a rate maybe HERTZ .. but the closer you get to C^2 the closer you will get to something no one will be able to stop

    an electron lined up same line as center line magnet because its constrained both sides by CEMF and EMF (or + - I ) and approaces PERFECTION without variance at variable C Hz

    Perfection meaning (1:1):1 (mass to energy)to rotation ratio

  • like if his GYROSCOPIC theory is WRONG then you would expect letting the BACK EMF back into the NEWMAN COIL would cause the CURRENT to stop.

    THIS IS EXACTLY what you want to happen... at a rate that is in phase with the rotating of the magnet (probably there will be no option)

    I dont know why you use transistors/mosfets on the commutator

    A PHYSICAL commutator ensures that CEMF is in PHASE with EMF so that

    CEMF; EMF; and speed of electron

    are all that one atom has

  • electrons in copper all rotate the same way so if you can control there movement in one direction X, Y, or Z

    then all you have left are VECTORS in the other two directions.. that form a circle or an elipse as a function of time.

    the ones 90 to the magnet poles do nothing

    and the ones 180 to the magnet poles speed up the magnet

    BECAUSE we are using the NORMAL ROTATION of the ATOMS electrons and not the CURRENT that we are passing through Just enough to get the ELECTRONS TO STOP

  • Think 5 steel balls that make the two outside ones bounce back and forth......

    NOW think FORCING all the balls to vibrate back and forth wildly THE center ball sit still in my example

    BUT in an ATOM it will force the electrons to line up with the magnet and the ones that move to fast to break free and ARC (make plasma... I.E. when MASS BECOMES ENERGY)

    the arc is necessary.

  • dont use the back EMF

    LOSE the back emf

    Let the back emf be UNCONTROLLED

    and simply use what you get out of the GENERATOR.

    the shaft will rotate SLOWER the way i describe so simply use MECHANICAL advantage to build your GENERATOR for OUTPUT up to useful RPM

    THE CEMF + the EMF is what causes the conversion of MASS into energy.... 

    Forces all the electrons to STAND STILL and USES VOLTAGE ONLY instead of amperage.

    IDEALLY amps WILL approach 0 on imput when you get it right.

  • The back EMF has to be LEFT in the IMPUT COILS and MECHANICALLY passed

    THE SPARK gap is kinda like cold fission

    E=MC^2

    Newman says over and over he converts MASS into energy.

    if there isnt a SPARK then there isnt conversion of MASS into ENERGY

    you cannot collect the back EMF into a CAP... you have to leave it in the 4 barrels allow CEMF to slowly build into your EMF

    The CEMF; EMF contrains MASS like a PONG atari game and points it approaching a vector useful

  • nice and neat work keep it up!!

  • well, you don´t have to ask for Watts in and Watts out. Watts out are smaller than in - what else!. There are transformators inside converting electrical energie in magnetical or mechanical force - and otherway. So there is no secret energy in this system. Thought this system isn´t much efficient because there are 3 cores to much lowering down the force of the one usefull core.

  • the output maH is small because you read the power current drive by the lamps. do you repeat the test with a resistor 1ohm or direct in short cut and read the max. power ouput ok ?. Of course if you drive the back emf at the output you win few mah add to the final poewr output. miguel from Uruguay

  • can u tell what the watt in an watt out is

    its clear u have a profesional approch to ur work and its one of the good vids on u tube quality stuff i have had a go with hho and produced about half a liter in 45 odd seconds hope u can do better as i was very disshartend and havent done many more experiments after i tryed PWM and was less impressed i have sckmatics somewhere for that if ur intersted perhaps it would bring u better luck

  • Hi daftman you are the man love your work you have very good designs I am a mechanic in central illinois im 30 just got interested in so called free energy i am a beleiver i have hho cell and bedini motor would love for you explain how to biuld hall effects switch if you could i would like to build one

  • The diagram is on the TEEP form, the link is on this page of youtube, please look up on the right click on (more info) to see the link.

    You will find the diagram in Technical help and Questions.

    Look for (TheDaftMans downloadable and printable diagram.)

    Please let me know if you need anymore help.

  • How much speed does it achieve?

  • @theDaftman there is a tremendous amount of drag from air in that motor try it in a vacuum should help out a bit

  • @kyranUK aha, I was thinking the same thing

  • first law of science: you can't create energy out of nothing

  • Hats Off To You Daftman!

    The Negatives......would be well advised to think for a minute about energy.

    Energy is within all matter.

    This energy is entering somewhere in the circuit. Therefore these overunity devices break no laws currently accepted. We simply are not advanced enough to build the instruments to measure this energy.

    But, you are right...it never will work, LOL

  • what circuit did you use??

  • Hall effects (they switch with a magnetic field) that just switch transistors on and off like a reed switch but no moving parts, the circuit is one of my own designs but I have now redesigned it so will post soon.

  • sounds like a gas engine :D

  • You're sooo right .. "brainwashing" keeps us within the confines of where the "creators of accepted standards" want us ...

    Please .. Keep On Working Outside of The System's Box .. We Need You.

    All power To You ..

  • ditto ... I think what u r doing is unreal ... what a great adventure to be on.

  • Hey Daftman

    Self sustaining motors or over-unity motors are great fun.I am watching your vids with lots of enthusiasm.

    It's quite possible to self run this type of motor.

    Please keep it up or we all might as well.Don't forget even if anyone claimed to have created a perpetual motion machine the government scientists wouldn't admit it, they can't there to scared to.

    please keep up the good work and forget all those single minded people.

    :-)

  • Please do not give up I too do not post vids I do not have vid cam I need the money for other things (R+D) I did'nt do well in school but have educated myself in many many things in the past thirty years, if scientist threw the towel in we would'nt be were we are to day. Look a your vid counts this has to say it all. Many of us are searching for a break through in our own fields. Just because someone else can't do it does'nt not mean you can,t. "Remember tesla"

    Kind Regards

  • @hhoprofessor

    Hey, dumbass, the difference is that Tesla produced, this "over unity" thing in this video produces, too. 6 watts from over 36 used. Where is the relationship. Not only that, you can buy a web cam at Walmart for next to nothing, "research and develop" that that.

  • Well Homedistiller is actually correct. Nicely crafted little machine though. You say it yourself in your vid Daftman: if you connect the output from the alternator to the motors, the machine will not self sustain for any amount of time. That's just how it works. You will never make a perpetual motion machine (please correct me if I'm wrong in assuming that you're trying to achive a functional perpetual motion machine)

  • Like I say you all win I will never make a perpetual motion machine so I will stop now and give up then.

    A lot of you keep emailing me (not posting) saying they want me to give up so I will. I dont want to get in to defending things all the time so Im not going to. After all in not getting anywhere with it am i.

  • You have made alot of progress building a successful alternator and those motors. Why not focus that talent towards trying to caputure some useful energy from the sun or the wind or whatever!

  • Been their done that and that would be like a busmans holiday to me. I dont want to blow my own trumpet but Im one of them guys that seems to succeed in everything I do. I was having a blast failing and getting things wrong and have learnt more by doing that than anything I have ever studied for. Like I have stated in some of my videos I have thrown out all that I know to be correct with this research and just tried it instead.

  • I wish I hadnt bothered with some of the years of classrooms because in the last 12 months a lot of what was drummed in now looks like brain washing now.

  • id like to see some theroy or math todo with this machine to show that you are as good as you seem to think you are..

  • What is the point theory on this kind of work after all it cannot work and want work like I stated in my first video. If I was to publish theory it would only get debunked, I havent come across anything in this field that holds water. Most out there have closed minds so to then what is the point in trying, in other words if it dont conform to convention it cannot work at all.

  • So I dont have any theories on any of my work on youtube and if I had they wouldnt hold water hence know theory or megerments and Im not interested in any discussion on this full stop. This one is what it is 4 Newmans with a generator with different ways for it to run that tests other youtubers work to see if it has any merit.

  • The idea of this unit was not my idea, it was one of my youtube buddies, and if he reads this he will tell you it wasnt my idea but his, A Bill. Now it seems like Im to be challenged all Im going to say is I will only give full details on anything that works has intended but like most I will not holed my breath. Now I will not respond to any more challengers like this unless I publish any theory full stop so with that please dont waste your time asking or commenting like any of the above.

  • Sorry it seems I have accidentally removed Drevtoobes comment. I intended to hit the reply tab but must of hit the remove tab instead. This was the comment left by Drevtoobe.

  • Nice to see your motor-generator running. It looks like a nice flexible setup for performing all sorts of tests. Ultimately taking the testing to the next level is the key for all of the builders. Make real power-in power-out measurements, measure efficiencies, measure battery start/end output impedance, measure charging power, estimate and measure battery energy, do measurements on test vs. control setups, etc. I am not holding my breath for this to happen though.

  • I will post on above when I have something worth explaining in depth but up to now I havent so I havent.

    But may be I will consider doing so. Thanks for your comments and sorry for accidentally removing it.

  • Thank you for the recovery and for your comments. A suggestion for everyone would be measure the charging power from your setup by swapping out the charging battery and running some tests with a large cap and a 'bleeding' resistor. Once you know your charging power, compare that with the amount of energy you put in the battery to get your charging effeciency. You would have to get Marthale7's famous CPU-heatsink battery tester software to measure the batt energy. It could be fun.

  • For me right from the start of all my experimenting is for a self-running unit, so if Im not getting more power out than I putting in then unit is a complete failure for me. Im not in to charging batteries. But yes test results would be nice.

  • Hey Daftman,

    I dont understand the term Cogging.

    Can you explain what that is?

    Please.

    Eddie

  • oh and if you had any idea of power generation you would know that cogging is the magnetic "stepping" effect that you get when you move the magnetic poles over the center of the coils, you can feel it is you turn a stepper motor (although in a alternator without iron you have no cogging effect so in this case it has no relevance as he has no iron in the alternator) a better design to use that has no cogging is an axial flux alternator

  • HomeDistiller please tone down you replies some members are just starting out with all this.

    But you explanation is good but now need for the dig. (Oh and if you had any idea of power generation you would know that cogging is) we all had to start somewhere even you. Again thanks for the explanation and your time in replying.

  • Good eplanation! BUT 75% right 25% wrong man :) and yeah,, could you please tone dwon your reply?

    People who knows more, is eager and diggin for more, while people who knows less is eager to show what's his best.

    You could be a guru for knowing such things "HOMIE", peace buddy. Let's take it easy, aight??? Life is short. hehehe!

  • molto bello ..complimenti!!===)) from italy

  • Wow man! You rock. I was leaning a lot from you and thought you wre gone and now you're back, just great and plus more ipmprovement on your research. That's just great.

  • Yeah! You are back! I was waiting to see this motor in action! So good!

  • hiya m8 just like 2 say again,thx 4 showin/sharin ur work with ur faithful fans.

    as usual keep up the good work AND im glad u havnt been shot by some oil company hit men.

    we all love ur work plz do not give up ur work bcuz it ur knowlage is 2 great 2 be ignored....thx again Brat.

  • Very nice design. You are getting a lot of speed and plenty of torque. How about putting 2 more generators on it (one on each end). With 3 generators, would it have the power to run itself? Or would the extra generators cause the motors to draw more amps and end up with a net loss.

  • Awesome work Daft! Very clean design. Never give up!

    peace,

  • Thanks Daftman! you are an inspiration to us all.

  • I would like to send you an article. May I have your email address for that purpose?

  • The new setup looks great! You're inspiring me out of more sleep! Thanks.

  • Bravo Daftman! BRAVO!! Smokin Hot design! I have a grin from ear to ear. Pay no attention to negative comments, it's pure jealousy! Your circuits out perform them all. If I replicate this design, I will drive my wife nuts! I dont think I could put it away. Wow it's fast...WOW!..LOL!! Once again, you have set the bar very high. You inspire me! Thank you for sharing your talent on U-Tube. Eddie
  • great stuff mate, cheers for sticking it up here.

  • man you are a genious.keep up the good work.

    It's gonna take someone like you to solve

    the problem.

  • Id like to just point out one thing to everyone before you all send anymore emails, Joseph Newman motors run on voltage only not amps/currant so the 3 phase generator was built to test that theory. So please remember before commenting about the output currant of the generator. As you see it thats how I intended it to be except the voltage comes out at 30 volt in stead of 24 max but if Joseph Newman is correct then thats good not bad has more volts means more revs.

  • This alternator will give almost 50 watts when a full load is applied and spun up with an efficient motor. I did test it before connecting it up to the Newman motors and I have built about 40. So please no more comments on the inefficiency of the alternator thats probably the only thing that is correct. Its more than likely to be my electronics that need a good tweak I think I should have used mosfets.

  • Remember this is an experiment not any definitive.

    So again Joseph Newman states is motor runs on voltage only not amps/currant so its the motors or the electronics thats incorrect not the alternator.

    Dam 500-word count.

  • Jefferson or joseph?

  • Sorry Joseph its the old age you know. I have now edited it thanks for you observations.

  • no worries ...fantastic work!!!

  • i think this motor uses voltage not corrent to run better but for that it´s essencial to use a big coil with many turns and wire .

    sorry abaut the english

  • i think the problem with the replications we are seing in youtube is that the first coil as no enought cable and turns !

    the original motor has more than 90 km of cable that is a big problem to replicate !!!

    kmarinas86 have a simple motor that shows that !

    you cold use a multimeter with capacity to measure the frequency of the corrent conected to a coil , when you aproach that coil to a rotary magnet you will now the rpm of the motor easy .

  • daftman, thank you for your work, and for the sharing of your video documentation. don't take anyone's critique too harshly, you're work is straight-up wicked. i would categorize you as a master, and send you to work directly with joseph newman himself. all the best -cheering.

  • there's no doubt that if it wasn't reigned-in, this little summabitch could fly! very sweet job daftman -cheering

  • Well most of what you say is correct. All the magnets are Neodymium. MASSIVE clearance on generator was to limit the cogging effects on load. If I were to insert iron, it would improve the 3-phase alternator performance but at a cost in the form of cogging effect and as you point out the Newman motors are inefficient, so definitely no cogging of any kind would be in order. The effect of MASSIVE clearance is the 3-phase alternator is not so efficient.

  • The output of the alternator has be configured star for voltage has Jefferson Newman states his motors run on voltage and not currant, so I went for voltage not currant. I can get more currant but with less voltage by reconfiguring the alternators output to delta. But thats not what I was after,so to sum up if Jefferson Newman was correct in that is motors runs on voltage and not currant,

  • by connecting my alternators output to one of the 4 Newman motors it would pickup speed and more speed more voltage and so on. Has you can see thats not the case. And the next thing I will be doing is replacing all the electronics that is what is burning up the currant. Maybe Jefferson Newman is still correct about his motors and my control circuitry is at fault.

  • So sorry for my none conforming build if I was to stick to convention this kind of system will never work.

    Thank you all for youre input its all useful.

    Dam 500 word count.

  • Yours is the only negative comment.

    This man is not wasting his time.

    He is an inspiration.

    Your video's dont compare.

    If you think you can do better, prove it.

  • This was meant for homedistiller

  • i know i cant do better because there is NO SUCH THING as "over-unity" it has never been shown to exists in any real experiments that can be reproduced by anyone. the Newman motor has been denied patents many times because it has been tested and DOESN'T WORK

  • Yes you are quite correct but just think back in time. The computer would never work nor would the microwave oven even the jet never mind the Internet. Life as been full of debunked ideas but like most things it will get there and most likely a maverick will pave the way. Im finding out things that was drummed in at collage are wrong. How about you? Before you reply just have a ponder on it for a day or 2

  • i don't know where you get the idea that the microwave, the computer, the Internet or the jet wouldn't work... they all worked from the get go just not very well, and people never thought they would be as commonly used as they have become.. but all there effects could be PROVED i have yet to find ANY solid evidence that this "overunity" has EVER been really achieved if it had then why are we not using them for power? most were "invented" in the 80's so thats about 20 years of RnD give or take

  • and yet no one is using them to power there house or lab.. in fact i would like to see one power a single LED for more than a few minutes (giving time for the power to run out), if overunity exists then it would change the laws of conservation of energy and make allot of the rules of physics wrong, you cant get power from nothing and i REAL fail how you can get it from an inefficient design alternator.. just using the laws of electro-magnetics and generation you know that it cant happen

  • Probably bad examples but I think we all get the picture.

  • no i fail to get the picture, I'm sorry but its imposable to get overunity by converting electricity to magnetic flux (heat losses) then magnetic flux to kinetic energy via magnetic repulsion (waisted flux as it goes outside the coil as well as inside) and then store that for a short time (friction losses) and then hope to GAIN energy by running the conversions the other way round.. it just has me dumbfounded that anyone would think this would work!!!

  • Ok let's just say you are correct and lets leave it there.

  • I'm sure you'll reach the overunity. keep up the good job

  • The obvious craftsmanship is inspirational. The non standard principles are thought provoking. I am curious as to why so much effort in the Newman/Bedini pulsing style hardware are DC devices and not AC. I would like to see an apparatus capable of running my Electric Kettle at 110Volts AC at 2.5 Amps

  • If I can I give 10 star and a planet

    Only a question Did you put the avramenkos plug on the generator coil?

  • cool daftman,, I have been waiting a long time to see this sucker running. good job!

  • very very impressive build! and i really appreciate the visible Amp/Volt meters in the front showing what's happening! hurray to you!

  • All right!! I want one of these things.. I am, however, a terrible scientist .. haha..I tried to make my own bedini circuit but apparently I am an idiot... anyhow... I appreciate your work.. and am always interested in your exploits.. keep up the good work!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more