France n'est rien sans l'Amérique et qui est une baise qui a été prouvé dans les guerres mondiales et aujourd'hui sur la Libye pour la fermer et de sucer la bite en Amérique chiennes
A lot of Americans and British give the French crap regarding their military. Why? I have no idea. They were always a strong nation during Medieval and classical history and then under Napoleon they were the most dominant power in the world. Only until all of Europe combined their strength was Napoleon brought down, and the decline of the French military after Napoleon's defeat was why the French military was so weak in WWI and WWII.
@RJhasFLOW ALSO, in Afghanistan today, French military units are one of the most effective of the coalition. I think people hate on the French because they are proud to be French. A shame in my opinion.
Thanks to those who have supported us in Afghanistan and good luck to France and your military.
French was not weak in WWI, we fought until the end, and won most of the WWI battles. In WWII, the government lost the battle of Franc (after 6 weeks of fighting and more than 100000 people dead on both sides), but the french militaries continued to fight along with the brits under the flag of the French Free Forces.
@chenoir When I said that the French military was weak in WWI and WWII, I was speaking comparatively. France went from being the greatest military power in Europe to a relatively small force. I didn't mean to take anything away from their efforts. They fought throughout WWI and in WWII, continued to fight under different names.
@RJhasFLOW I don't think our army was any weaker than the other armies engaged in the conflict. Had the right strategy been employed we could've stopped the germans and could've even pushed them back in Germany because it was so poorly defended. French politicians were the ones to blame for not using a more than decent army the right way. The reason why the French had to give up so quickly wasn't because they were cowards or because their army was bad. They just were strategically outmatched.
@eikkkN Then I suggest you go back to school. Or watch some documentaries instead of coming on youtube and posting comments that clearly show you don't know what you're talking about. See YOU now ;)
@O8SOL3TE See u too, u don't live in France, I am French so I can certainly tell the french history better than any Anglo-Saxon. cya frnech basher fdp
@eikkkN Oh of course you're not french, else you'd know about your country's history wouldn't you? Au fait, la mienne porte le nom, la tienne fait le métier. Now stop breaking my jewels. I'm right, you're wrong wrong and wrong again. This is where it stops.
You are correct that the main reason the Nazi German forces defeated the initial French military defence of France was due to the General staff of the French Army clinging to largely out-dated tactics while the German's had innovated (Blitzkrieg). That being said, in WWI, France lost 1.1 million soldiers. The French military suffered a tremendous blow. The effect of the blow was still present during the onset of WWII.
@chenoir Uhm the EF-2000 is way more manuverble,it has supercruise,its semi stealth.Its overall in those ways suppior,armed with meteor long range missiles its even better.But as i said there NATO it doesnt matter.
No way the EF2000 is more manoeuvrable than the Rafale, which has too Supercruise.
Plus the EF2000 SER is like 5 times higher than the rafale one which has both semi-passive and active stealth. And the Rafale too is equipped with meteor long range AAM
the Rafale is a last generation fighter ( but not stealth so not "5th" ) it's a multi rôle fighter, fighter/bomber/reco and it's a naval fighter as well as an air force fighter.
he has 2 engines. M2000 has 1
its a concentrate of the last technology.
you can compare him to an eurofighter typhoon, the Rafale is a bit better (and the typhoon is not a naval fighter )
the Mirage 2000 is an air supériority fighter mainly. you can compare M2000 to an F16 in better
"The Dassault Rafale is a French twin-engined delta-wing highly agile multi-role fighter aircraft designed and built by Dassault Aviation. Dassault uses "Omni Role" as a marketing term in an effort to differentiate the aircraft from other "multi-role" fighters that have primary and secondary roles. Dassault also uses the term to indicate the Rafale's ability to switch from one role to another during a single sortie."
"although the term is mostly meant to encapsulate the fact that the Rafale is replacing seven specialised planes.RAFALE CARRYING FORWARD A TRADITIONS OF FREEDOM "
Segun lei, en eso radica el problema del Rafale para vender fuera de Francia, muchos no ven la razon para comprar un Rafale cuando no ven mucha diferencia del Mirage 2000, por eso buscan aviones como el Jas-39 que se le ha ido alante al Rafale en varias ventas internacionales.
l' Eurofighter ne vaux pas le Rafale!le Typhoon fait pitié a coté et j'aime pas son estéthique!vive le rafale,le Fleuron de l'armée de l'air et vive Dassault!
Ouep, l'Eurofighter est sans doute l'un des "trucs" (j'ose même pas appeler ça un avion) les plus moches crées par la main de l'homme. j'en suis même à penser qu'il ne vole que grâce à la répulsion de la terre qui a honte d'être foulée par un tel truc et qui donc l'envoie en l'air pour s'en débarasser.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Eurofighter is much better but France say Rafle is and can i tell you one thing French degsiners of the Rafele pinched most of the idea from Eurofighter
Yeah right thanks Kevin, hope it's not too late in Kansas, have a good night. Any way, Rafale first flight was on the 4th of July 1986 wereas the Eurofighter first fly in 1994, Rafale was fist used in 2001 wereas the eurofighter served for the first time in 2004 but they are both good fighters, that's true...
This has been flagged as spam show
France n'est rien sans l'Amérique et qui est une baise qui a été prouvé dans les guerres mondiales et aujourd'hui sur la Libye pour la fermer et de sucer la bite en Amérique chiennes
algerimazigh 2 months ago
superbe clip sur le RAFALE mais par contre la musique peut être à changer
esprit83990 3 months ago
çà c'est de la "bête",et le Marine est encore mieux!
clodius25 3 months ago 2
it looks like they're surrendering... AGAIN.
SwompMonsta 7 months ago
Comment removed
LeHoink 7 months ago
@SwompMonsta
It looks that you should stop saying bullshit ;D
Have a nice day byt the way.
Vive la France !
samados969 4 months ago
gorgeous plane !!! go french air force !!!
esprit83990 9 months ago
the best plane!! amazing!!
IceMirage5 1 year ago
@ chenoir so why typhoon lose in every manoeuvers?
cigognesforever 1 year ago
A lot of Americans and British give the French crap regarding their military. Why? I have no idea. They were always a strong nation during Medieval and classical history and then under Napoleon they were the most dominant power in the world. Only until all of Europe combined their strength was Napoleon brought down, and the decline of the French military after Napoleon's defeat was why the French military was so weak in WWI and WWII.
RJhasFLOW 1 year ago
@RJhasFLOW ALSO, in Afghanistan today, French military units are one of the most effective of the coalition. I think people hate on the French because they are proud to be French. A shame in my opinion.
Thanks to those who have supported us in Afghanistan and good luck to France and your military.
RJhasFLOW 1 year ago
@RJhasFLOW
French was not weak in WWI, we fought until the end, and won most of the WWI battles. In WWII, the government lost the battle of Franc (after 6 weeks of fighting and more than 100000 people dead on both sides), but the french militaries continued to fight along with the brits under the flag of the French Free Forces.
chenoir 1 year ago
@chenoir When I said that the French military was weak in WWI and WWII, I was speaking comparatively. France went from being the greatest military power in Europe to a relatively small force. I didn't mean to take anything away from their efforts. They fought throughout WWI and in WWII, continued to fight under different names.
RJhasFLOW 1 year ago
@RJhasFLOW I don't think our army was any weaker than the other armies engaged in the conflict. Had the right strategy been employed we could've stopped the germans and could've even pushed them back in Germany because it was so poorly defended. French politicians were the ones to blame for not using a more than decent army the right way. The reason why the French had to give up so quickly wasn't because they were cowards or because their army was bad. They just were strategically outmatched.
O8SOL3TE 11 months ago
@O8SOL3TE u r ridiculous
eikkkN 11 months ago
@eikkkN How constructive. Typical reply from a guy who knows he's wrong, good job :D
O8SOL3TE 11 months ago
@O8SOL3TE u say things wich never happened, who is the more stupid ?
eikkkN 11 months ago
@eikkkN I guess you as you suck at history it seems ;)
O8SOL3TE 11 months ago
@O8SOL3TE you come from? In France we have probably history lessons most consistent with French history, logic. cya
eikkkN 11 months ago
@eikkkN Then I suggest you go back to school. Or watch some documentaries instead of coming on youtube and posting comments that clearly show you don't know what you're talking about. See YOU now ;)
O8SOL3TE 11 months ago
@O8SOL3TE See u too, u don't live in France, I am French so I can certainly tell the french history better than any Anglo-Saxon. cya frnech basher fdp
eikkkN 11 months ago
@eikkkN Oh of course you're not french, else you'd know about your country's history wouldn't you? Au fait, la mienne porte le nom, la tienne fait le métier. Now stop breaking my jewels. I'm right, you're wrong wrong and wrong again. This is where it stops.
O8SOL3TE 11 months ago
@O8SOL3TE Bah comme t'es français on va pouvoir parler entre français ?
eikkkN 11 months ago
@O8SOL3TE I assume you're speaking about WWII.
You are correct that the main reason the Nazi German forces defeated the initial French military defence of France was due to the General staff of the French Army clinging to largely out-dated tactics while the German's had innovated (Blitzkrieg). That being said, in WWI, France lost 1.1 million soldiers. The French military suffered a tremendous blow. The effect of the blow was still present during the onset of WWII.
RJhasFLOW 11 months ago
@O8SOL3TE
The german army was FAR more numerous than any other any european armies, and german industry was as big as american one.
Imagin : Russia, England, France, USA, all thoses states to barely wipe out ONE state.
MrStaxxy 10 months ago
@RJhasFLOW And that's the government's responsability :).
O8SOL3TE 11 months ago
I think the EF-2000 is supperior to this.But there NATO so thats a good thing.
1bearcatf8f 1 year ago
@1bearcatf8f
Nope, the EF-2000 was beaten 7-1 in air engagement by the rafale in March ATLC in the UEA.
And it doesn't have half the AG capabilities of the Rafale.
Only advantage is it's a bit more powerful.
chenoir 1 year ago
@chenoir Uhm the EF-2000 is way more manuverble,it has supercruise,its semi stealth.Its overall in those ways suppior,armed with meteor long range missiles its even better.But as i said there NATO it doesnt matter.
1bearcatf8f 1 year ago
No way the EF2000 is more manoeuvrable than the Rafale, which has too Supercruise.
Plus the EF2000 SER is like 5 times higher than the rafale one which has both semi-passive and active stealth. And the Rafale too is equipped with meteor long range AAM
chenoir 1 year ago
@chenoir ugh the EF-2000 is an Air Suppiorority fighter,the Rafale is a multirole naval interceptar its not thats great compared to the F-22.
I know they both use Meteors.
But sence there both semi stealth our F-22 would be invisible if not a tiny bird to there radars where to the F-22 it sees 2 small planes.
1bearcatf8f 1 year ago
Hey France trade you 2 F/A-18 Hornets for 1 Rafales ..? : )
OlderG0ds 1 year ago
@OlderG0ds I find the F-18 cooler in looks and name lol
1bearcatf8f 1 year ago
an amazing french plane!
MsParis4ever 1 year ago 2
Very pretty aircraft :)
EdGeyy 1 year ago
At least use French music when promoting this aircraft. Can't blame everyone for using American though.
nimaside 2 years ago
RESPECT from italy
amazing plane
jezz155 2 years ago 24
Quel bonheur ça doit être de piloter un Rafale. Je préférerais 1000 fois être pilote de chasse sur Rafale que de gagner à l'euromillions...
jdhx1 2 years ago 7
@jdhx1
Bah, tu gagnes à l'euromillion tu peux t'acheter un Rafale et de quoi payer des heures de vol pour le reste de ta vie.
Par contre, vitesse limitée à 250kt au dessus du territoire français. Sauf à monter en niveau de vol.
chenoir 1 year ago
Anybody can tell me what´s difference between this aircraft and the Mirage 2000? thanks.
Alguien sabe cuánta es la diferencia entre este avión y el mirage 2000. Supongo que mucha.
Gracias.
chicuzo 2 years ago
2 Motors on rafale/1 motor on mirage
13 slots for missileson rafale/8 on mirage
Self defensive system and fire and forget system on rafale.
More more more aggressive in flight combat.
virtuose60 2 years ago
bigs differents between them.
the Rafale is a last generation fighter ( but not stealth so not "5th" ) it's a multi rôle fighter, fighter/bomber/reco and it's a naval fighter as well as an air force fighter.
he has 2 engines. M2000 has 1
its a concentrate of the last technology.
you can compare him to an eurofighter typhoon, the Rafale is a bit better (and the typhoon is not a naval fighter )
the Mirage 2000 is an air supériority fighter mainly. you can compare M2000 to an F16 in better
XavierB0126 2 years ago
i said he s not totally stealth but he s half stealth.
with passiv and activ stealth.
the Rafale is actually the best naval fighter and the best multirôle fighter.
only an F22 and maybe a SU-35 are better in air supériority but they arent multi rôle aircraft.
to finish the Typhoon is very similar to the Rafale but he s not as good as the Rafale in Bomber and in dogfight.
The rafale has some unique capacity.
XavierB0126 2 years ago
"The Dassault Rafale is a French twin-engined delta-wing highly agile multi-role fighter aircraft designed and built by Dassault Aviation. Dassault uses "Omni Role" as a marketing term in an effort to differentiate the aircraft from other "multi-role" fighters that have primary and secondary roles. Dassault also uses the term to indicate the Rafale's ability to switch from one role to another during a single sortie."
XavierB0126 2 years ago
"although the term is mostly meant to encapsulate the fact that the Rafale is replacing seven specialised planes.RAFALE CARRYING FORWARD A TRADITIONS OF FREEDOM "
XavierB0126 2 years ago
Saurais-tu si le F-22 est bloqué à 9G comme le F-16 et d'autres avions de l'US air force?
moiGTO 2 years ago
Segun lei, en eso radica el problema del Rafale para vender fuera de Francia, muchos no ven la razon para comprar un Rafale cuando no ven mucha diferencia del Mirage 2000, por eso buscan aviones como el Jas-39 que se le ha ido alante al Rafale en varias ventas internacionales.
hubergeek 2 years ago
question idiote, c'est sur une durée de vie complete des appareils que ca se chiffre
bingofioul 2 years ago
Brazil is close to buy some of these fighters
guigaguiga 2 years ago 2
un f16 25 millions €, un Rafale 60 millions €
oui je pense, je sais même. même si le radar du Rafale F2 est son gros point faible contre le typhoon, le standard F3 va réglé tout sa
XavierB0126 2 years ago
Le radar du Rafale est très bon. Voir meilleur que celui du Typhon qui n'a même pas de balayage électronique.
Et le RBE2 que Thales est en train de développer le rendra excellent.
vinventparisos 2 years ago
trés cher pour les marocains le Rafale
XavierB0126 2 years ago 3
c vraiment 1 avion magnifique! vive l'armée française! ET fier d'etre français
par contre j'aurais preferé entendre le bruit du rafale aulieu de cette musique
lanouvellemaman 2 years ago
Rafale, armée de l'air, metallica, que demander de plus :p
kiwix02 2 years ago 2
Tout simplement eblouissant
Fier d'être français
vercint 2 years ago 5
allez la france
francefer 2 years ago
c'est vraiment un magnifique appareil !
AndytheFrench 2 years ago 2
Ouais il est magnifique mais en attendant, il nous coute un pont et personne d'autre n'en veut!
ririshow 2 years ago
exacte !
imdicatf 2 years ago
Un des meilleurs avion de combat actuellement.
Performant et beau.
Les Russes et Américains sont aussi présents, avec les données disponibles difficiles d'établir une première place ..
Danieldetarb 2 years ago 4
l' Eurofighter ne vaux pas le Rafale!le Typhoon fait pitié a coté et j'aime pas son estéthique!vive le rafale,le Fleuron de l'armée de l'air et vive Dassault!
CFRjoe 2 years ago 6
Ouep, l'Eurofighter est sans doute l'un des "trucs" (j'ose même pas appeler ça un avion) les plus moches crées par la main de l'homme. j'en suis même à penser qu'il ne vole que grâce à la répulsion de la terre qui a honte d'être foulée par un tel truc et qui donc l'envoie en l'air pour s'en débarasser.
chenoir 2 years ago 10
de toute façon le Rafale est légèrement meilleur que le typhoon
XavierB0126 2 years ago
Vive Dassault et vive la France!
duverny 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Eurofighter is much better but France say Rafle is and can i tell you one thing French degsiners of the Rafele pinched most of the idea from Eurofighter
funnydude098 3 years ago
Yeah right thanks Kevin, hope it's not too late in Kansas, have a good night. Any way, Rafale first flight was on the 4th of July 1986 wereas the Eurofighter first fly in 1994, Rafale was fist used in 2001 wereas the eurofighter served for the first time in 2004 but they are both good fighters, that's true...
Vankerguelen 2 years ago 2
Il est magnifique notre rafale
leportossdu38 3 years ago 4
n'oubliez pas vos taxes et impôts pour cela
essai75 3 years ago
Très bel avion n'est-ce pas, mais n'oublions pas la propulsion, 2 réacteurs "M88" SNECMA.
gegedi77 3 years ago
Le meilleur avion du monde et il est français!!
Nationaliste34 3 years ago 6
Hermoso video.-
argentinoplatense 3 years ago
Nice bird!
vym84 3 years ago 5
wat song is this
roger50046 3 years ago
Metallica - Master of puppets
kirjolohipastilli 3 years ago
One of those jets that look like a real fighter not like a metal box fitted with jet engine!
mjufpn 3 years ago 6
Like F-117?
kirjolohipastilli 3 years ago
whooooa not to mention that one!
mjufpn 3 years ago
@mjufpn Dude the F-117 wasnt a fighter jet it had no air to air capabilitys.
1bearcatf8f 1 year ago
Two of my favorites...good music and jets!
bdub24j 3 years ago
puede ser que la parte del video cuando van 2:45 sea de la guerra de Malvinas?
FERBUBU765 3 years ago
sorry, i dont understand french ):
kirjolohipastilli 3 years ago
It's not french it's spanish^^ He asked if a part of the video was taken from the Falklands War (Argentina/England)...
Vive la France! Une merveille cet avion!
Rezzzzzzzzz 3 years ago
I don't know
kirjolohipastilli 3 years ago
Fucking awsome.
dunkinJordans 4 years ago
Thx!
kirjolohipastilli 4 years ago